Clayton Kershaw and the Unfairness of Narratives

I still remember where I was the first time Playoff Kershaw became a thing. It was 2013, and the Dodgers were a juggernaut. They’d steamrolled through the second half of the regular season behind an exuberant Yasiel Puig and a dominant Clayton Kershaw, and they manhandled the Braves in the NLDS behind two triumphant starts from their ace; 13 innings, a solitary earned run, and 18 strikeouts.

He pitched well against the Cardinals in his first start of the NLCS, a 1-0 loss, which brings us to my memory. Game 6, an elimination game for Los Angeles, wasn’t going to be easy for me to watch. My girlfriend and I were in a remote town in Argentinian Patagonia, and the satellite signal came in intermittently between cloudbursts. On a grainy, 18-inch TV, we sat down to watch the broadcast in Spanish.

Kershaw imploded. Michael Wacha dominated. The announcers screamed with joy at every run, exulted in rich and varied pronunciations of “Kershaw” and “Wacha,” and generally had a great time. I drank it in right along with them, marveling at the good fortune that led the Cardinals past such a formidable opponent with a rookie starter on the mound. I couldn’t have known it was the start of something bigger.

I remember where I was the first time I started to wonder about Playoff Kershaw. It was a year later, and here were the Cardinals again, this time in the NLDS. My girlfriend and I were on vacation with my mom, and we were watching the game from an old TV in our hotel room by the beach. The Cardinals coughed up six early runs, and I was just not in the mood to watch anymore. It was a five run deficit, and it was freaking Clayton Kershaw on the mound; the best pitcher in baseball, maybe the best pitcher of the 21st century.

We left, went to get pizza. It was a lovely little restaurant, and hey, it was just the first game of the NLDS. There was always tomorrow. Then the texts started coming in, and the phone alerts, and the call from my dad. Kershaw was out for the seventh inning, and the Cardinals were getting to him. Three singles, four singles, five singles, a bases-clearing double given up to a lefty — it boggled the mind.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

He pitched again in that series; on short rest, as he so often seems to, back against the wall, and this time I was glued to the TV for the entire game. He was magnificent through six innings; one hit, nine strikeouts, no hope for the Cardinals. But as he came out for the seventh inning, the crowd had inexplicable life. Kershaw had imploded last seventh inning; why couldn’t he do it again?

And naturally, it happened. He gave up two singles, and then a home run, to Matt Adams of all people, and that was it. 3-2 Cardinals, game effectively over. As I sat there watching it, I was happy– who wouldn’t want another shot at those darn even-year Giants? At the same time though, I couldn’t shake a sense of unfairness, a sense that Kershaw didn’t deserve this.

There he was in the dugout, slumped in despair and shock, and it just sucked. My disbelief mirrored his. This wasn’t supposed to be how it worked for Clayton Kershaw. The 1-0 losses, 3-2 losses, sure, that’s baseball. Three straight baserunners to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, after such a dominant performance? It couldn’t be.

I remember where I was the first time I felt truly sad on Playoff Kershaw’s behalf. It was 2016, and it looked like Kershaw’s demons had finally been slain. He’d been shaky against the Nationals; eight earned runs over two starts, the second on short rest as the Dodgers faced elimination. The team won both games, but they still needed to pull out a deciding Game 5. And Kershaw came in, for two glorious outs of relief, a dramatic feat on one day of rest that felt like it might right the narrative once and for all.

And there I was, at a bar in downtown Manhattan, to watch Kershaw continue to rewrite his own narrative. He’d mowed the Cubs down in the second game of the series, seven innings of two-hit ball, and with another great performance this night, yet another elimination game, he might erase the past. My girlfriend and I were rooting, if not for the Dodgers, then for Kersh; for the scales of luck to finally even out.

But of course, things didn’t even out. The Cubs jumped on him for two runs in the first, and they kept scraping away; an RBI single here, a solo home run or two there, and before you knew it the score was 5-0 and Kershaw was back to the dugout, sitting by himself in a warmup jacket looking miserable.

I watched, and sympathized, and even empathized. Who among us hasn’t had a high-pressure situation, one where we need to do a task we’re experts at, and had it completely blow up in our faces? Who hasn’t tripped over their own feet, or forgotten their pitch mid-meeting, or played the wrong note at the concert after nailing the song in practice?

Of course, for Kershaw, it wasn’t a meeting or a seventh-grade piano recital. It was the playoffs, and everyone was watching. And it wasn’t just one time. The game of baseball played Lucy to his Charlie Brown, over and over again, and only when the largest possible audience was paying attention.

To be honest with you, I don’t remember where I was when I watched Kershaw in the 2017 and 2018 playoffs. He was slowing already, his effectiveness sapped by a balky back and the march of time. He still had his moments; four dazzling innings of relief in Game 7 of the 2017 World Series, a triumphant save to close out the 2018 NLCS.

But it didn’t feel like it was enough, didn’t feel like it could ever be enough, to outrun the mythology that surrounded him. Those performances could only beat back the darkness for a fleeting second; then he’d allow six runs to a stacked Astros team, or struggle in an elimination game against the Red Sox, and it was the same old Playoff Kershaw again.

I remember where I was two nights ago, when I felt the Playoff Kershaw narrative solidify to an unchangeable epitaph. I was sitting at home, waiting for my wife to get back from the airport and join me on the couch to watch some thrilling baseball. I didn’t have a horse in the race, not particularly; my Cardinals fandom has waned over the years as I’ve spent more time analyzing baseball, and neither team seemed like a particularly appealing opponent for St. Louis anyway.

The Nationals had their own tragic past, too: they’d never won a series, depending on your view of the Wild Card game, and they’d lost to the Dodgers in heartbreaking fashion in that 2016 series, blowing a 2-1 lead and having to watch Kershaw himself finish them off. And so when Kershaw came in to wriggle out of a jam of Walker Buehler’s making, in that accursed seventh inning, it felt like the story might change for the better again.

But even then, there were warning signs. His fastball had lost its zip; his first pitch to Adam Eaton clocked in at 90.6 mph. His secondary stuff wasn’t as sharp it normally is. When he came out for the eighth inning, to face two of the best hitters on the planet, it came apart quickly.

His second pitch to Anthony Rendon, an 89.4 mph fastball (yikes), ended up over the left field fence. His third, an 89.3 mph slider (this seems bad!) that backed up and hung over the plate, was absolutely obliterated; Juan Soto hit it 449 feet to center, and the game was tied.

And for Kershaw, that’s all there was. He was back in the dugout, hunched over, staring at his hands. It couldn’t happen again, and yet it did. The Nationals won, because of course they did; that’s just how life works sometimes.

At this point in the article, I’m supposed to assure you that this is all a fluke, and so I will. In his regular season career, Kershaw has struck out 27.5% of the batters he’s faced and walked 6.4%. In the playoffs, those numbers stand at 26.4% and 7%. In the regular season, he’s allowed a .270 BABIP; it’s .264 in the playoffs. He’s allowed slightly fewer line drives and gotten more infield pop-ups.

But the home runs; the back-breaking, poorly-timed home runs. 15.2% of the fly balls he’s allowed in the playoffs have left the yard, much higher than his 9% regular season rate. He’s allowed 24 home runs in only 158.1 innings pitched. His LOB%, 79.4% in the regular season, is a dismal 66% in the postseason (league average is 72.3%, and better pitchers tend to have higher LOB%), in large part due to home runs clearing those baserunners.

That’s the math of the situation; it can’t change the feeling, though, the little voice in the back of your head that says “Hey, are you ready for this?” every time Kershaw pitches in October. And if the voice is in your head, you can be sure it’s in Kershaw’s too, every time he gives up a home run or a chain of singles. Is this all luck? Could it possibly be luck? How can it keep happening to me? Am I tipping my pitches? Pressing too hard? Not pressing hard enough?

It’s enough to make me sad, enough to make me want to hug Kershaw and tell him it will be okay. Except of course I don’t know Clayton Kershaw, will never talk to him in my life; he probably doesn’t care what I think anyway, probably doesn’t want my hug. It just stings, feels bad for me and surely way worse for him, and there’s nothing I can do about that.

This alter-ego, Playoff Kershaw, will always be a part of his story. He’s not the same pitcher he was five years ago, a world-dominating colossus putting up season after season of 2-ish ERA’s. He’s a good pitcher still, an excellent one even, but you could make a persuasive argument that he’s not even one of the best two Dodgers starters. The Kershaw that could have changed this narrative, could have pitched so excellently that we forgot the previous struggles, isn’t here anymore.

In some ways, that doesn’t matter. Clayton Kershaw is rich, and he’s accomplished, and by all accounts he’s a great person. When his career is over, we’ll remember all those things. We’ll remember him as one of the greatest pitchers ever. But we’ll remember the postseason failure too, and likely just as much as we’ll remember the regular season success.

They’ll surely stick with him; when he’s 45 and thinking about his career, he might wonder if he should have thrown Matt Adams a slider there instead of a curve, or started Soto off with a fastball inside. Baseball isn’t fair, of course, and in a zero-sum game there’s a goat for every hero, a “Why did you throw that pitch?” for every pivotal home run. It just feels, to me, deeply unfair that so much of the sorrow has been heaped on one player. Clayton Kershaw deserves better, and it saddens me that he won’t get it.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

108 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
bensnider94
6 years ago

This is a great article, but I kept reading partially to make sure that you kept the girlfriend.

JimMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  bensnider94

Hey, is it the SAME girlfriend? Maybe there were 2-3 different ones.

lemurineMember since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Ben Clemens

Yeah but she does because I guess you are as good as the regular season Kershaw. Nice article, thanks.

Dag Gummit
6 years ago
Reply to  bensnider94

I’ve gotta praise how sly it was when he just casually changed “girlfriend” to “wife” on the fourth mention.

Psychic... Powerless...
6 years ago

Excellent stuff.

lilpudgeMember since 2020
6 years ago

Nats fan here. I remember the existential dread when Kershaw came in for Murphy and Difo in 2016. Two days ago as Kershaw started the 8th, I was gleeful. Confident for the first time since the Hernandez homer in the 2nd that the Nats would be able to make a game of it. The drop off those two guys have had in the last 3 years is wild, and it’s also devastatingly sad.

NATS FanMember since 2018
6 years ago
Reply to  lilpudge

Go Nats!

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago

I think what feels different about this time compared to the past years is that his postseason this year feels like who he is now in the regular season. There feels like there’s a finality here that wasn’t around before with him.

Was listening to sports talk radio yesterday and they were trying to figure out a comp for him in any sports. They really couldn’t figure many… It’s such a unique situation.

bly
6 years ago

Kershaw, best starter of 2000s would be an interesting article. He leads in FIP (1500+ IP to clear out the closers), but in WAR he’s fourth, so there’s an argument to be made but it’s not a lock. Some age adjustment is needed for both stats.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  bly

In ERA he’s up by 0.59 over #2 Chris Sale. #3 is Madbum. It’s Kershaw, and it’s everyone else….

The WAR point- he’s #4 really only because of innings pitched. He’s thrown 700 fewer than Verlander(7.5 behind), 1300 fewer than Sabathia(2.0 behind), and even 300 fewer than Halladay(who he is in essence tied with). Verlander started in 2006 fully, Sabathia in 2001. Kershaw 107 IP in 2008 and then full in 2009.

lilpudgeMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Yeah, if you look at WAR/200IP or another rate-adjusted measure of wins added, the story changes quite a bit, I think.

emh1969
6 years ago
Reply to  lilpudge

How great has Kershaw been? He’s almost exactly 1 year older than Chris Sale. And yet, as great as Sale has been, he’s 20 pitching WAR behind Kershaw. (oddly, he’s exactly 20.0 WAR behind on both Fangraphs and Baseball Reference).

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

That’s somewhat though due to the fact that Sale went to college and Kershaw didn’t. Also Sale started in the pen and had only 94 innings thru his age 22 season. Kershaw by that point had already 483 innings in the book.

emh1969
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

True but…

1) None of that makes up for a 20 WAR difference
2) Sale went almost directly to the majors so his time in college had almost no impact on his development relative to Kershaw
3) Part of the reason Sale started off as a reliever is that there were lots of concerns about whether or not he could handle starting. There weren’t similar concerns about Kershaw.

Anyway, just thought it was an interesting comparison since they’re roughly the same age and debuted at around the same time.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

Kershaw has 645 innings more than Sale does. A LOT of the innings difference is Kershaw going from HS, Sale from College.. Kershaw is also 1 year older than Sale is.

Also Kershaw did debut 2 years earlier than Sale did.

emh1969
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

“A LOT of the innings difference is Kershaw going from HS, Sale from College.”

That’s simply not true. Kershaw spent a lot more time in the minors than Sale did. He debuted at age 20 pitching 107.2 innings, whereas Sale debuted at age 21. Again though, you’re ignoring the point that Kershaw was capable of pitching big innings at a young age whereas Sale wasn’t.

“Kershaw is also 1 year older than Sale is.”

As I stated in my original comment.

Anyway, all I was doing was making a fun little comparison. You’re taking this WAY more seriously than anyone should…

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

He did spend a lot more time in the minors. But his rookie draft was 2006. Sale’s was 2007.

Kershaw drafted June 2006. He was in MLB by May 2008. Even if you take just from then until end of 2009, he already had 278.2 innings pitched in MLB.

Sale drafted June 2007 initially but went to college. Redrafted in June 2010. you take until end of 2010, he had 10.1 innings.

So about 270 inning difference just there. And next year as well where what you said about Sale not able to pitch the big innings was very true(and frankly- is still a question with him).

Oh and innings pitched does have a part into a WAR difference. WAR isn’t just how well you pitch, but how much you pitch.

Earl of EMember since 2020
6 years ago

As a Yankee fan since the late sixties, I have never rooted for the Dodgers and it is unlikely that I ever will. But boy do I feel bad for Kershaw. Even if you say nobody “deserves” better luck, in that spot he at least deserved a manager on his game enough to take him out after Rendon’s home run.

FS54
6 years ago
Reply to  Earl of E

It is a lefty-lefty matchup. Why would you take him out?

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  FS54

Because Kershaw is a homer prone pitcher and Kolarek had owned Soto in the series.

EasyenoughMember since 2016
6 years ago

What’s imissing here is the responsibility that Dave Robert’s carries for putting Kershaw repeatedly in vulnerable, ill considered positions. It’s hard not to think about Verlander who it seems doesn’t pitch on short rest. And even he, when he was asked to pitch with disadvantages did poorly. Same with Scherzer.

Generally makes me wonder how much managers can do to create or damage a players myth. Leaving Flaherty in, which doesn’t make a ton of sense to me, can mainly be explained by a commitment to HIS routine. But he will now carry a post season ERA around in his press kit that will insulate him some from his variance based next poor performance.

I think Dave Robert’s is the source of Kershaw’s tears. Kind of the opposite of the treatment of another fading great. CC Sabathia – still being put in a position to meet the lowered expectations of his team.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

lets look at what Roberts has done.
2016- had him pitch in the Washington series in game 4 on short rest. They were down 2-1. He did get hit hard in that game. But extremely reasonable situation- one that I think most managers do.
2016- had him pitch in the Washington series in game 5 at the end. He did well.
2016- had him pitch in the Cubs series in game 2. Somewhat short rest. He nailed it.
2016- game 6 Cubs. Normal rest. All on Kershaw
2017- only unusual outing was game 7 of the World Series where he nailed it.
2018- has Kershaw close out game 7 of the LCS. Then starts in the WS game 1 3 days later. Gets hit pretty hard- then again in game 5.
2019 what happened on Wednesday.

Only ones you could blame Roberts for at all would be game 1 of the 2018 World Series and then Wednesday night. Everything else pretty much any manager would do.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

In 2017 game 5 I’d blame Roberts’ bad managing but in a different way. He had completely wiped out his relief staff through various shenanigans to such an extent that the Dodgers lost the game even though they scored 12 runs. It didn’t affect Kershaw’s line score but it certainly affected the legend of Kershaw’s postseason failures in the sense that if he’d pitched poorly but the Dodgers won anyway it would be something entirely different (from the historical perspective) than what happened. Losing game 5 of a previously 2-2 series even though your team scores 12 runs, and then your team goes on to lose the series, is something which pretty much sets a narrative in stone.

Aside from that, the failure in 2016 game 5 vs. the Cubs could certainly have been affected by what Roberts has put Kershaw through earlier in the playoffs that year. On Oct. 13 he pitched 6.2 innings on 3 days rest. After one days’ rest he pitched 0.2 innings and then after 2 days rest he made his regular start and pitched 7 innings. All of that could well have affected Kershaw’s bad performance in the next game. I’d say the same about game 5 of the 2018 Series, yes it was on normal rest but right before that he was overused.

In relation to whether Roberts’ decisions to use Kershaw in exception circumstances in 2016 can be justified, I would argue that Roberts should have started Hill instead of Kershaw in game 2 vs. Chicago. Hill had only thrown 55 pitches 3 days before, the day Kershaw relieved, and 82 pitches in his previous start, while Kershaw—aside from his relief performance—had thrown 110 and 101 pitches in his previous two starts. In any case both Kershaw and Hill were going to start two games against the Cubs if the series went 7 games, and Kershaw had clearly been used more heavily recently than Hill, so if it was just a question of order, Hill should have gone first. And yes, Kershaw pitched very well in that game, but it caught up with him in the following game. What happened was that Roberts was willing to consider game 5 vs. the Nats to be a special case with regard to using Kershaw as a reliever but not with regards to Hill being pulled early and therefore being better rested for the next start. In a must-win game you should certainly throw out considerations of what your pitching situation will be like after (other than exceptional circumstances like game of the Cardinals-Braves series last week), but if you win you can’t just continue with your pitching plans as though it was a normal situation.

Also, in game 4 vs. Washington in 2016, Roberts’ decision to bring in first Baez and then Avilan when Kershaw left with the bases loaded in the 7th inning and a 5-2 lead (which they immediately blew, so that Kershaw was charged with 5 runs rather than 2) was pretty bizarre. Baez was his #2 reliever after Jansen, so why burn him for one batter? Avilan had only pitched 19.2 innings all year, so why bring him into such an important situation?

This said, I agree with the following post with regards to Mattingly being even worse than Roberts.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

I’d add that Don Mattingly far more than Dave Roberts is responsible for things.

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2024
6 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

Roberts’ decision to leave him all the sounds and noise of “leaving the veteran in to get one” like Grady Little did with Pedro. At a certain point, you need to look at it clearly. If he pitches well, and the Dodgers advance, maybe Kershaw gets to own it. But his job is to get the first 5-6 innings, not a 7th inning. I would love to imagine that the intelligent choice were he to have started that game would be for him not to pitch the 7th, regardless of performance to that point.

Sammy Sooser
6 years ago

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Among other things, Roberts probably thought he was presenting Kershaw with opportunities to break through, to shed the poor playoff performance reputation.

We Dodger fans have it pretty good. We’re not immune to heartbreak, and seeing Kersh, alone, with his head in his hands… damn. Could’ve/should’ve aside, I’ve seen it all. From buckling Sean Casey’s knees in Spring Training as a babe, with a laughing Vin Scully dubbing the curve “Public Enemy #1”, to the aforementioned scene. He’s easy to root for, and I hope he gets some measure of redemption. For now, I’m just sad.

fjtorres
6 years ago

The playoffs are cruel.
Price can tell Kershaw a thing or two about that.

Mahoney
6 years ago

On a related note, I wonder how Adam Kolarek feels. You’re on the roster for only one reason, but when that situation arises, your manager decides not to use you anyway.

Whatever he’s feeling, I bet Randy Choate and Dave Stapleton could relate.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

well how about this- not only that- but given the future rules…..

HandsomeBoyModel
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

The rules wouldn’t have prevented him from pitching to Soto in the 8th or the 10th.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago

no, but he would have had to throw to other guys as well.

HandsomeBoyModel
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

I might be mistaken but I thought the rule was a new pitcher to start an inning is required to face 3 batters. So in the 8th he would’ve relieved Kershaw who came into the game in the 7th. And in the 10th, he would came in after Kelly faced two batters.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago

The rule is ANY pitcher who comes in has to face 3 batters(or get out of the inning). So in the both situations he would have to face not only Soto, but Kendrick and Zimmerman.

HandsomeBoyModel
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Yes you are correct. Now I feel bad for Kolarek.

HandsomeBoyModel
6 years ago

You’d think with all this history and the reality of his diminishing stuff, the Dodgers would’ve been OK with him being the #3 starter in the Postseason but no. So what if we have a Cy Young candidate who has been dominant at home, he should start Game 3.

The Dodgers are described as a highly analytical team but they let romance take over in the Postseason when it comes to Kershaw.

They didn’t want to start Ryu is Game 2 because they wanted Kershaw available in Game 5. But why? What supports that? Nothing but the hope for a narrative.

CJMember since 2020
6 years ago

@HandsomeBoyModel: I’m sympathetic to what you wrote, but Dodgers knew Ryu won’t be able to pitch on game 5 even if he pitched game 2 – Ryu does not do bullpen sessions between starts, and he’s not good on short rests.
I do blame Dodgers for cornering themselves into a situation where they felt compelled to rely on Kershaw to get those 3 batters out, and Joe Kelly(!) for more than 1 IP when Jansen is still available, while taking out Maeda after 1IP to boot.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  CJ

with the way the schedule goes game 2 to game 5 is 4 days or regular rest.. day off between 2 and 3 and day off between 4 and 5.

throw1
6 years ago

Unfairness? Your sympathy is highly misdirected. As a baseball player, you will be lucky if you ever get a chance to play in a World Series. Kershaw let his team down twice. And he prevented them from going a 3rd time. “The Kershaw who could have changed the narrative” never existed. He is at his core a choker. A guy who melts under pressure and is mediocre to poor against elite batters and teams.

I don’t buy your March of Time comment. Charlie Morton and Verlander are both 35 and are doing their job. Yes, he is rich, but undeservedly so. He knows what he is and that is why he performs poorly when it counts. I question the good person comment. Someone who parades his toddlers in press interviews to manipulate Dodger management and the fans for a higher contract payout when he loses two World Series is not good.

Kershaw is the reason the Dodgers do not have a World Series. He let them down twice and denied them a third opportunity this year. The thing everyone fails to grasp is the Ace sets the tone for the pitching staff. If you perform badly, you poison the rest of the other pitcher’s performance, you sap their confidence, and the morale of everyone. This was evident in the meltdowns of other pitchers in the 2017 and 2018 World Series. Kershaw got paid more for losing two World Series. Crawl back in to your cave Kersh. It’s where you belong. Oh, and try changing out that filthy baseball cap for a clean one. You’re lucky hat ain’t working.

SucramRenrutMember since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  throw1

GFY. It’s a kid’s game played by men. But I also hope you get the help you need.

throw1
6 years ago
Reply to  SucramRenrut

GFY. You backwards spelling dumb person.

Ukranian to Vietnamese to French is back
6 years ago
Reply to  throw1

injustice? Your emotions are wrong. As a baseball player you will be lucky to have the opportunity to play in the World Series. Kershoo released his team twice. He stopped them a third time. “Kersho, who can change Naru” never existed. It’s in the brain. The guy who melted under pressure and was so poorly average about Elite teams and teams.

I don’t buy comment on time. Charlie Morton and Verlander are 35 and doing their jobs. He is rich but not worthy. He knows what it is about, so it works poorly when it counts. This is a good comment from everyone. Some people in the evenings start printing interviews to manipulate Dodger managers and fans for a bigger deal when he too takes the World Series.

Kersho is going to do some more additions without saying a word. He coughed twice and gave him a chance to have a threesome. Everything everyone knows about the beauty of the village. If you are not very good, you will have a hybrid of other blood, not yet have vein information and better than tut tat tat. You like the latest 2017 World Series news for 2017 to 2018. Kersho has a lot of money for two VVorld series. Save your data in the jungle jungle, Kersh. I forbid you to smoke. Oh, gong Thailand Joo Mu Bong Sach and the anti-ban bottle. Well, here it is, it doesn’t work.

CL1NTMember since 2026
6 years ago

Chronically unemployed??? LMAO. What does that even MEAN??

You realize that using weird adjectives in front of words doesn’t necessarily make you seem any smarter??

Chronically unemployed!!
I chronically laughed out loud on that one.

throw1
6 years ago
Reply to  CL1NT

You’re showing your lack of education and dumbness. That’s a valid word . Google it and learn it, since it represents what you’ll be with your barely hs education. If you have something important to say, write a paragraph with your points. Then we’ll confirm how dumb you are.

curt schillings ketchup bottle
6 years ago
Reply to  throw1

I think it’s ffair to say your attitude and hot take both suck a substantial bag of d****

paulkrugman
6 years ago
Reply to  throw1

I hate Clayton Kershaw (cause I hate the Dodgers). Let’s set these idiots straight once and for all, how the dude is mediocre to poor against elite teams.

First, career numbers vs teams below .500:

2.48 ERA, .212/.267/.318 opponent hitters’ slash line

So the guy cleans up against the bottom feeders. Just as expected!

Now, his career numbers vs teams ABOVE .500:

2.41 ERA, .206/.258/.318 opponent hitters’ slash line……

/forgetaboutit

throw1
6 years ago
Reply to  paulkrugman

Hey Malcolm Jamal, elite baseball is played in the playoffs. What good are your regular season stats when your ERA is above 4 when you’re playing to win the World Series? The postseason results speak for themselves. You should hate Kershaw because he is a guy who lets his team down year after year when it really matters.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  paulkrugman

Just because a team is over .500 doesn’t mean they’re a good offensive team. St Louis and Milwaukee were over .500. They were both below average offensive teams.

Also this season- this wasn’t the case at all…..
sub .500 2.60 ERA, .214/.259/.361 slash
over .500 3.54 ERA .231/.281/.432 slash

throw1
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

This is a good point. Over .500 does not represent an elite team. Closer to .650- .700 does.

PhilMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  throw1

A .650 winning percentage is a 105 win team.

And Kershaw didn’t face a 105 win team because 1) he played for one, and helped them be a 106 win team – and 2) the Dodgers didn’t get to play the Astros this year.

John Elway
6 years ago
Reply to  throw1

How long have you been a Dodger fan?

throw1
6 years ago
Reply to  throw1

I don’t get you all. Why are you defending a guy who ultimately lets his team down when it matters most? Don’t you realize you won’t make in your lifetime what this guy makes in one game he pitches? Despite all his failure, he goes home to luxury and security you will never have. The Dodgers needed him to pitch for 1.3 innings and he couldn’t even get past the 0.3 inning mark. Is that too big an ask for a 31 million dollar paycheck?

T. Slothrop
6 years ago
Reply to  throw1

Show me on the doll where the bad man touched you. It’s OK — you’re not in trouble, little guy. We just need to figure out what kind of help you need.

throw1
6 years ago
Reply to  T. Slothrop

It’s obvious you’ve been touched by the bad man and beaten with the stupidity stick. If you can counter any of the arguments above , do it. You can’t so you resort to this, because you are both damaged and dumb.

Noah BaronMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  throw1

I think most of us are just surprised that someone who views baseball this way would stumble upon Fangraphs. Nobody wants to argue with you about whether Kershaw’s ERA is deserved, because it doesn’t seem like you’re the type of guy who would be persuaded by looking at Kershaw’s xFIP or SIERA.

But here’s one thought for you to consider: Kershaw’s career batting average against in the postseason is .218, his career WHIP is 1.10. Does that sound like someone who has been completely horrible in the playoffs and who deserves to have a 4.43 ERA?

throw1
6 years ago
Reply to  Noah Baron

I’m willing to listen to any intelligent argument. A > 4.0 ERA belies how horrible it is in a World Series. Those earned runs were given up at critical points and lost key games. I just pulled up his 2018 WS ERA and it’s 7.36. If your ace throws that you’re going to lose the championship.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Noah Baron

the homers kill him. double his regular season rate.

sbf21
6 years ago
Reply to  throw1

Huh. Have Russian trolls taken to posting comments on sports venues?

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2024
6 years ago
Reply to  throw1

YUCK

cardinalskenobi
6 years ago

It kind of makes me sad to know your “Cardinals fandom has waned over the years”. It’s kind of like watching the original trilogy after watching the Last Jedi. It’s still amazing stuff, but now every time I read one of your articles, I’ll remember that the imaginary bond of fandom we shared has diminished and it will make me a little sad.

tung_twista
6 years ago

Fun fact.
In postseason games when Kershaw started, the Dodgers are 13-12
which is obviously not great but not as terrible as you might have expected from all the hoopla.
For comparison, here are some postseason results in games when these pitchers started.

Greg Maddux: 14-16
Randy Johnson: 6-10
Pedro Martinez: 6-8
Roger Clemens: 17-17
Justin Verlander: 15-11
Zack Greinke: 6-6
C.C. Sabathia: 14-9
Max Scherzer: 5-10
Madison Bumgarner: 11-3
David Price: 4-10

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

he’s 2-5 now in his last 7 though and lost 3 straight starts.

tung_twista
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Which means he was 11-7 long after “POSTSEASON KERSHAW” became a thing.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Some starts that even though they won, he wasn’t good(both starts vs Was in 2016 they won- but he had a 6.17 ERA in those 2 starts). He’s had 11 quality starts in the postseason.

every single season but 2015 he’s had at least 1 implosion.
2008 1 run in 0.1 innings
2009 5 runs in 4.2 innings
2013 7 runs in 4 innings
2014 8 runs in 6.2 innings
2015 3 runs in 6.2 innings(closest thing to a good postseason)
2016 3 runs in 5 innings, 5 runs in 6.2 innings, 4 runs in 5 innings
2017 4 runs in 6.1 innings, 6 runs in 4.2 innings
2018 4 runs in 3 innings, 5 runs in 4 innings, 4 runs in 7 innings
2019 2 runs in 0.1 innings

tung_twista
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

I’m not arguing that Kershaw was good in the postseason because he wasn’t.
I’m certainly not going to pretend he didn’t have some dreadful games.
But he wasn’t as bad as people perceive him to be because Kershaw blowing games is much more memorable than Kershaw pitching decent.
That, of course, is the power of narratives.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

In the regular season Kershaw has had for his career 74% quality starts. In the postseason that number is only 44%.

2008 you can really throw out, and frankly probably 2009. He had 2 really well known flame outs in 2013 and 2014. And now 2016-18 he’s had an incredible when you think about it 8 flameouts. None as bad as in 2013-14 but still just reinforces things.

It’d be nice for someone instead of just lazily saying it’s a narrative to dig really into why his numbers haven’t been as good in the postseason.

Noah BaronMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

It isn’t hard to figure out. Stats like ERA take a really long time to stabilize, even with as many postseason innings as Kershaw has. Stats like K% and BB% don’t, and those are roughly the same as they are in the postseason. Add in the fact that in the postseason you’re facing better opponents, he’s being asked to go well over 100 pitches, and he’s often asked to pitch on 3 days rest, it isn’t hard to see what’s going on.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Noah Baron

The FIP- though is huge. goes from 69 to 96. Homers. Doubled from the regular season 0.68 to 1.36 per 9. Even xFIP goes from 2.98 to 3.49. His ground balls down while fly balls up. GB/FB ratio from 1.38 regular season to 1.15 in post season. And even the walks/K’s are both worse in the playoffs(K-BB% drops from 21.1% to 19.4).

To the point on 3 days rest. He has 6 starts on short rest…. His ERA in those 6 games 3.43. Add in his 4 appearances from pen and his ERA in short rest is 3.16. Now, he’s had 8 years in the playoffs starting. His first start in those 8 years, his ERA is 4.13.

And you say it takes a long time for stats like ERA to stabilize. Well 2 things. He’d have to throw now over 60 innings to equal his regular season ERA. AND why doesn’t any other star pitcher have the same fate?

PhilMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

David Price: regular season ERA: 3.31 and postseason ERA: 4.62
Zack Grienke: regular season ERA: 3.35 and postseason ERA: 4.58
Chris Sale: regular season ERA: 3.03 and postseason ERA: 5.76

Are those three big enough stars for you?

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Phil

And Kershaw’s regular season ERA is 2.44 postseason is 4.43. So while Price is +1.31 and Greinke is +1.23 Kershaw is +1.99.

Kershaw 82% worse than regular season
Price 40% worse than regular season
Greinke 37% worse than regular season

And Chris Sale’s postseason is based on 25 innings pitched. Hardly enough to make any conclusions.

CL1NTMember since 2026
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Lol you are relentless

free-range turducken
6 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Johnson’s record = his height lol.

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2024
6 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

What was Clemens’ record in games not against Dave Stewart?

CJMember since 2020
6 years ago

On a number of occasions of his ‘failures’, it seemed obvious that Kershaw was on the mound for too long, since Dodgers, for all their financial and analytical might, NEVER had a bullpen you could trust for 3 innings, so Kershaw HAD to get them through the 7th, until he couldn’t. He shouldn’t have HAD TO come in for that 8th if Dodgers had a functioning bullpen.

I’m not saying Kershaw is blameless, but anyone can have a bad start to one’s ‘big game’ performances, and you’d think the team, analytics or not, would try to put one in a favourable situation, instead of treating him like Boxer in Animal Farm – I know the analogy is probably a little extreme, and he has been more than adequately compensated, but as far as his playoff workload/usage goes, I really think Dodgers’ front office has to take responsibility. I think a hallmark of a well-built team, worthy of a championship (of course you are better lucky than good, but I digress), is to have enough contingency to not have to rely on any one player to be in top form every time, no matter who that is.

mgwalker
6 years ago
Reply to  CJ

Exactly! Several of the first few postseason episodes (Cardinals) were late-inning exhaustion following masterful performances in innings 1-6. A few more were short-rest experiments. Give the Dodgers a bullpen and another reliable starter in the peak Kershaw years, and the narrative is totally different. Alternatively, when they have a bullpen and another reliable starter during the post-peak Kershaw years, give the Dodgers a manager with the wisdom to use them.

Neils-Henning Orsted Joc Pederson
6 years ago
Reply to  mgwalker

If my math is correct, Kershaw has made 19 career playoff starts on regular (or more) rest.

In those 19 “normal” starts he’s pitched 111.2 innings and permitted 59 earned runs, for an ERA of 4.76. In the 8 initial starts he’s made to begin his postseasons (2009, and 2013-19), he’s logged 52.1 innings and allowed 24 ER, for a 4.13 ERA. So even at the very start of the playoffs, frequently pitching with extra rest, he apparently just hasn’t been himself, for whatever reasons.

Maybe Kershaw’s just run out of gas in October, I don’t know. But based on the above numbers it’s hard to blame his overall October mediocrity on managerial malfeasance — unless of course you wanna argue that he was excessively hard-used during the regular seasons.

I think that perhaps the topic worth investigating is the Bochy/Bumgarner phenomenon, i.e., did Bochy routinely alter MadBum’s usage in any way down the stretch, to make him stronger for the playoffs? I’m too lazy to research that one. (Apologies to anyone who’s already published said research.)

Noah BaronMember since 2016
6 years ago

You’re ignoring the first part of his comment, where he specifies that it’s not just 3 days rest that’s the issue; it’s the fact that he often gives up those runs late in games when he shouldn’t be in there, well over 100 pitches, because they often don’t have faith in their bullpen.

Neils-Henning Orsted Joc Pederson
6 years ago
Reply to  Noah Baron

Thanks for taking the time to respond. But I did not ignore anything. I checked the pitch counts before posting my comment. I did not bring it up, because the pitch count argument does not hold any water whatsoever. You talk about “well over 100 pitches,” right? Let’s look at the numbers.

Among the 19 “regular rest or more” games I cited (collective 4.76 ERA), Kershaw exceeded 106 pitches on just three occasions. And in those three starts he allowed a combined 12 runs in 20.1 innings.

Remove those three starts from his record, and in the remaining 16 starts his ERA barely drops, from 4.76 to 4.68. There is no pitch count argument to be made.

But let’s say we make the cutoff 100 pitches. That would remove two more games. So we’re talking 14 playoff starts, all on regular rest or more, and all with Clayton throwing fewer than 100 pitches. Whittling down to those 14 games the ERA actually rises, from 4.68 to 4.81.

It’s not impugning Kershaw’s character to say he’s simply been much less effective in October than the regular season. He’s been much less effective regardless of rest or role or managerial decisionmaking.

mgwalker
6 years ago

Thank you for providing the numbers, and your insightful analysis. I do not think those can capture, however, what I think is a real ‘snowball’ effect here. If a bullpen enters in the 7th to close down Kershaw’s otherwise dominant starts against the Cardinals, those implosions never happen, and thus don’t plant the seeds of the Kershaw playoff narrative, altering both his and opponents’ psychology going forward. Sorry to be invoking something that is not quantifiable, but I suspect it is very real nonetheless.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  mgwalker

But here’s the thing with that. He had 2 bad starts vs the Cardinals…

2013 game 4. gave up 7 runs in 4 innings. hardly a dominant start
2014 game 1 . gave up 8 runs in 6.2 innings. Yes 6 were in the 7th. However, he entered the 7th inning having given up 2 runs and only 81 pitches entering the 7th- team up 6-2. In the 7th he starts the inning giving up 4 straight singles. If you have a good pen you see him removed maybe after 2-3 singles- with no outs. So yeah maybe don’t give up 6 in that inning, but odds pretty good that he gives up at least 1-2 runs.
2014 game 4. Gave up 3 runs in 6 innings. 3 in the 7th. They enter the inning up 2-0. He’s at 94 pitches entering the 7th. Goes single, single, homer. An ace is going to be left in for all 3 of those….

really only the 2014 game 1 is there much of a case.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago

The problem isn’t just the starts he’s pitched on short rest. When a pitcher gets used on short rest, the results aren’t necessarily only felt in the immediately following game. It’s cumulative.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago

would be curious if there is any real validity to this….

johnforthegiants
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

It’s pretty hard to imagine that there isn’t.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago

It would be nice to see a deep dive in that.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago

At least in 2014, which is I assume what the question is about, for some reason Bumgarner only started 4 games in September. I wasn’t paying attention to that at the time and as far as I can remember and from what I’ve checked after, there wasn’t any public discussion of why that happened. In the playoffs that year, Bumgarner started every 5th day like clockwork and never relieved, OTHER THAN the well-known 5-inning relief performance in game 7 of the World Series. Bumgarner’s performance in 2014 seems to have inspired a trend of managers overusing their aces in the postseason, but the truth is that Bumgarner wasn’t overused in 2014.

I have plenty of complaints about Bochy as a manager, really a lot, but one good thing which can be said about him is that he never overuses any pitcher, and that includes the relievers, who stayed remarkably free of injury and slumps given the typical volatility of relievers’ performances.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago

Another thing about Bumgarner which is worth mentioning is that while he isn’t a particularly hard thrower, he does generally jack up the speed about 2 mph on his fastball in the postseason. I remember reading a really interesting article a few years ago (I can’t remember the writer or name) in which the writer went to great length to demonstrate that Bumgarner’s effectiveness increased radically when the speed difference between his fastball and his ‘slurve’ was 8 mph rather than 6 mph, and that Bumgarner apparently knew it and tried to slow down the slurve, which resulted in losing control of it, or increase the speed of the fastball, which worked but he couldn’t keep it up for very long.

Noah BaronMember since 2016
6 years ago

I’ll just say that as a Mets fan, Kershaw was utterly dominating during that 2015 NLDS. In Game 1 he pitched 6 brilliant innings of 1 run ball with 11 strikeouts. And while he struggled a bit in the 7th, it was Pedro Baez who gave up the back-breaking single to Wright that scored 2 (charged to Kershaw of course). Mattingly left Kershaw in too long, and then proceeded to bring in a bullpen arm that worsened the situation.

Still, down 2-1 in the series, Kershaw was asked to pitch Game 4 on *3 days rest* on the road at Citi Field. And he completely dominated a Mets lineup that got to every other top pitcher they faced that postseason (Greinke, Arrieta, Lester, Hendricks), all on full rest. How many other top pitchers have been able to do what Kershaw did on 3 days rest? I’ll wait.

Sadly he is no longer the dominant pitcher he was from 2013-2017. So the false narrative that ignored the role of Kershaw’s managers pushing him way past 100 pitches, pitching him on 3 days rest, having bad bullpen arms come in and fail to strand any of Kershaw’s baserunners – while still having many many dominating performances during that stretch, is now being “confirmed” when a more middling, aging Kershaw struggles now.

In Kershaw’s last 7 regular season starts, he allowed 13 freaking home runs. What happened in this year’s playoffs had nothing to do with choking and everything to do with him not being the pitcher he once was. It’s sad that people conflate the two and ignore the many many times he was dominant in the playoffs before his injuries/aging.

T. Slothrop
6 years ago
Reply to  Noah Baron

Well-stated.

The only part of this whole nightmarish thing that really angers me are the morons who use the word “choke.” I’ve asked several over the years to explain what that word could possibly mean in describing a guy who has been both miserable _and_ masterful in the highest pressure situations. None of them have had the wit or honesty to essay a response, of course.

If the implication of the word is that the “choker” somehow lacks courage or determination, it seems odd that the lack would be episodic. What do these people think they’re describing?

NATS FanMember since 2018
6 years ago
Reply to  Noah Baron

Well said

Neils-Henning Orsted Joc Pederson
6 years ago
Reply to  Noah Baron

Re the 2013-2017 version of Kershaw, the dominant version who accrued an extraordinary regular season 5-year earned run average of 1.95.

From 2013-2017 in Octobers, THAT version of Kershaw made 12 playoff starts on regular rest or more, and in those 12 games he pitched 76.1 innings and allowed 40 earned runs, for a 4.72 ERA.

Even if we want to be very generous, and we toss out entirely the two times he was shelled for 7 and 8 runs by St. Louis, he still has a merely mortal 3.43 ERA in the other 10 starts. As opposed to that otherworldly 1.95.

The false narrative is that Kershaw in the postseason has been undone by his managers. (He’s been pretty mediocre when poorly used by his managers — and he’s been pretty mediocre when he wasn’t.) Another false narrative is that he somehow suddenly lacks character when the regular season ends. The latter narrative is of course the more offensive one, but they are equally inaccurate.

Maybe Clayton needed more skipped starts during the regular season, or more extra rest in the dog days of August. I don’t know. But again, he just has not been himself in the postseason.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Noah Baron

completely agree with you on this season. Those last 7 starts of the season this year- he was the 2nd to worst pitcher in MLB by fWAR. 4.35 ERA, 6.00 FIP. -0.2 WAR.

Then in playoffs he had a 7.11 ERA and 7.16 FIP. With 2 more homers

what was scary was the Rendon fastball was only 89 MPH.

That’s what makes this season seem so different with Kershaw. It’s no longer its just the playoffs. What we saw in the last week- that’s who Kershaw is now.

Will say he got unlucky that from 2010-12 he didn’t make the postseason. That’s 3 years where he was extremely good- 2011 he won the Cy Young, and 2012 he finished 2nd.

NATS FanMember since 2018
6 years ago

I think if you look at the entirety of pitcher performances since the wild card started there will likely be very few guys with significantly better than ,500 win loss records in post season play and probably few with better eras than in the regular Season. Baumgartner Is an obvious exception. Kershaw has been not much worse than I would expect facing 90 to over a 100 win teams repeatedly in a postseason. Your just selectively remembering his less than fortunate outings:

Neils-Henning Orsted Joc Pederson
6 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

“Kershaw has not been much worse than I would expect, facing 90 to over a 100 win teams repeatedly in the postseason.” Fair point. The playoffs are a different animal. We should probably look at as many pitchers as possible, in the specific context of October, to see how Kershaw’s performance compares to that of his peers.

Now, this is in no way meant to be a rigorously scientific and comprehensive study of star-level wildcard era twirlers, but comparing their career regular season ERA’s to career playoff ERA’s:

Clayton Kershaw 2.44 regular, 4.43 playoffs (25 starts)
David Price 3.31 versus 4.62 (14 starts)
C. C. Sabathia 3.74 and 4.31 (23 starts)
Pedro Martinez 2.93 and 3.46 (14starts)
Max Scherzer 3.20 and 3.60 (15 starts)
Roy Oswalt 3.36 and 3.73 (11 starts)
Andy Pettitte 3.85 and 3.81 (44 starts)
Justin Verlander 3.33 and 3.20 (26 starts)
John Lackey 3.92 and 3.44 (23 starts)
Adam Wainwright 3.39 and 2.79 (13 starts)
Chris Carpenter 3.76 and 3.00 (18 starts)
Cliff Lee 3.52 and 2.52 (11 starts)
Jon Lester 3.56 and 2.51 (22 starts)
And there’s HOFer Halladay and Stephen Strasburg, who’ve each pitched spectacularly in October, but only over 5 starts apiece.
Halladay 3.38 and 2.37
Strasburg 3.17 and 1.32

(I have undoubtedly forgotten a few prominent pitchers, and for that I apologize. This was top o’ my head, and again, it was meant as merely a rough overview rather than a meticulous and methodical SABR-worthy study.)

Out of respect for the most fragile of Dodger fans, I have elected not to show Madison Bumgarner’s numbers. Anyway, as we can see there just isn’t anyone else like Kershaw. Price is really the only one even remotely close.

And in general the October performances appear to mirror the regular season career lines, don’t they? If we added it all up, for each and every one of the above pitchers, it looks to me like the collective career October ERA’s would be remarkably near the non-October numbers.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago

I’m obviously a Giants fan and I think it’s very sad. I’m not sure at what point I started to feel like I actually wanted him to do something to really change the narrative, but it’s definitely been several years. As I’ve written here (a long entry above, I won’t repeat it here), I think that a significant part of it is that he’s had the bad fortune to play for two truly terrible managers who (among other things) managed playoff games on the basis of superhuman expectations of him, either in terms of leaving him in games too long even when he had clearly lost it for the day or in terms of overusing him in starts on short rest and relief appearances, which eventually caught up with him. In arguments with other Giants’ fans about ‘who’s better, Kershaw or Bumgarner?’, based obviously on postseason performance (if it was regular season there wouldn’t be an argument), I always point out that in Bumgarner’s 2014 run every single start was on 4 days rests, only the relief appearance in in Game 7 of the World Series was different, while Kershaw was never used that way (until 2018, when he was clearly going downhill), so it doesn’t make sense to compare them in this way. There is no question that Kershaw has failed in postseason games much more than a pitcher of his caliber would be expected to, but to my mind that’s because his managers made unrealistic demands of him.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago

Oops, I meant 2017, not 2018.

Mahoney
6 years ago

If Kershaw can someday pull a David Price and obliterate this narrative, I’d love to know your reaction to this as a Giants fan. This Red Sox fan felt a weird sense of happiness for ARod (of all people) when he destroyed his tag of being “unclutch” in the 2009 post-season.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

I suppose I’ll be happy for him unless it’s against the Giants but I’ll have to wait and see if it happens (which is looking increasingly unlikely).

tohupMember since 2020
6 years ago

I’ve been a Dodger fan since Reese was at ss and Duke roamed cf. I manage to travel with 2 grandsons to see Dodgers play at various cities. Of course I want to see a World Series trophy hoisted high over their heads but not before Kershaw retires and with Roberts in the dugout, that trophy will be out of reach anyway.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago
Reply to  tohup

They gotta get rid of Roberts. It’s incredible that he’s still around. Something is seriously wrong in the Dodger organization.

throw1
6 years ago

Facts
Kershaw pitches 4.02 ERA in 2017 World series; Allows 7 runs; Dodgers Lose
Kershaw pitches 7.36 ERA in 2018 World series; Allows 9 runs ( 2nd worse pitcher only allowed 4); Dodgers Lose
Kershaw signs 3 yr 93 million contract in off season, a pay increase of 11%
Kershaw allows 2 HR’s in six pitches 8th inning Game 5 NLDS; Dodgers Lose

sbf21
6 years ago

Really well written column. My sentiments are much the same as yours.

As a Yankees fan I’ve no love for the Dodgers but I wish better for Kershaw.

HydeMember since 2019
6 years ago

As a fellow Cardinals fan, I feel this. As much as I loved watching the Cards light him up repeatedly in the postseason, it didn’t seem right that he carried so much blame. Even in those two games, he was absolutely dominant for the majority of his starts. And it feels as if he’s so far in his own head at this point (or even after that 2013 NLDS) that the narrative can’t be beaten. Playoff Kershaw incontrovertibly exists, both in his mind and the minds of fans. It’s a shame that one of the greatest pitchers I’ve ever seen won’t be able to outpitch that fact.

tmccv
6 years ago

So were not going to talk about how he shouldn’t of been out there in the seventh but Mattingly couldn’t trust his pen so he was forced to leave him out there

johnforthegiants
6 years ago
Reply to  tmccv

The problem with this narrative is that it isn’t clear that the Dodgers’ bullpen was really that bad. Here are FIPs, ERA, and IPs for some of the Dodgers’ relievers in 2014 (I’m going to exclude Jansen because let’s assume that Mattingly wasn’t going to put Jansen in in the 7th):
Howell 3.30-2.39-49.0
League 3.40-2.57-63.0
Beaz 3.88-2.63-24.0
Rodriguez 2.92-3.86-14.0
All of them were rested at the time (it was the first game of the division series). Kershaw gave up 6 hits in the 7th (none of them infield hits) before he brought in Baez. I don’t know if I’ve ever heard of a pitcher giving up 6 hits in the 7th inning of any game, let alone a playoff game which was on the line, before being pulled; it really should be obvious some time before that that he’s lost it for the day. The Dodgers relief pitching just wasn’t that bad. It really isn’t accurate to say that Mattingly was ‘forced’ to leave Kershaw in.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  tmccv

1 problem with all the talk of the 7th inning is that Kershaw’s postseason ERA in innings 1-6 is still 3.63.

Angelsjunky
6 years ago

Nice read. You really should have included perhaps the most crucial stat: a ridiculous career 2.44 regular season ERA , vs a pedestrian 4.43 in the postseason. I know ERA isn’t cool among statnerds, but it does mean something, and when we’re talking about 158.1 IP, it means a lot. That’s a +2 run difference.

And here’s something even more interesting, which you did touch upon: an HR rate in the postseason exactly twice that in the regular season (1.36 to 0.68). Oh, blessed symmetry of numbers.