Cubs Make Surprising Move With Seiya Suzuki Signing

When we released our Top 100 Prospects list last month, one of the questions we heard most frequently was, “Where is Seiya Suzuki?” It was the subject of considerable internal debate, but the larger discussion revolved around whether or not the Japanese superstar even belonged on a prospect list.
While in terms of service time and rookie eligibility, Suzuki is technically a prospect, it just doesn’t feel right to rank him amongst unfinished products. He is not a player who requires development, or one where we’re talking about the gap between who he is now and what he can become. At 27, Suzuki is a player in his prime, with an impressive track record of performance at Japan’s highest level since his teens. This is not a prospect; this is an established talent who just hasn’t played in Major League Baseball yet.
That’s about to change. After a flurry of inaccurate Twitter reporting on Tuesday, Suzuki ended all speculation about his future on Wednesday morning by signing with the Cubs on a five-year, $85 million deal (when combined with his posting fee, Chicago will spend nearly $100 million for his services), where he’ll step right into the middle of the lineup as the everyday right fielder.
Suzuki’s performances in Japan have been nothing short of outstanding, with an OPS north of 1.000 in each of the last four seasons, including a career high of 1.073 with Hiroshima in 2021, when he hit .317/.443/.639 in 132 games with 38 home runs. Still, statistical projections for him can be challenging, as is the case with any player who has never been in the big leagues; there are skills, tools and traits that may lead to success elsewhere yet not translate at the game’s highest level. Still, Dan Szymborski gave it his best shot and in the end nearly hit a bullseye with a contract projection of five years and $83 million.
Scouts are just as optimistic as Dan as to Suzuki’s ability to produce in the big leagues. He’s a well-rounded player, but the beginning of any discussion about his potential begins with what he can do with a bat in his hands, and luckily for the Cubs and their fans, there’s a lot to like. He features the much desired combination of excellent swing decisions with a very good contact rate and rarely chases outside the zone, which you can reasonably expect will continue with the Cubs; breaking balls in Japan, while rarely matching the velocity he will see in the majors, do move just as much, if not more.
The biggest question is what will happen in the zone. Suzuki possesses a quick, compact, exceptionally simple swing that features excellent plate coverage from top to bottom. He fits in well with modern baseball’s swing plane obsession and hits most of his balls in the air with a very low groundball rate. But despite his lofty home run totals for Hiroshima, his power falls more into the plus range as opposed to anything overwhelming, and while he uses all fields effectively, most of his over-the-fence shots come from the pull side.
The biggest unanswered question for Suzuki, as is the case with any hitter coming over from Asia, is how he will do against consistent high-end velocity. The kind of radar-gun readings that earn middle-relief work in the big leagues are what players see from closers in Japan, and while the data we do have on him against higher-end fastballs is encouraging, it’s just not a large enough sample size to provide full assuredness of hit tool replication.
Suzuki certainly provides value beyond his hitting prowess as well. While not a base stealer, he does have average wheels and is a good baserunner who frequently can make the two-bag advancement on base hits. He shows good instincts and range in right field, and his arm is plus, but at times lacks accuracy. The baseline expectation is a plug-and-play corner outfielder worth three-plus wins, but there are evaluators out there who believe that the ‘plus’ part of that equation should be significant and take him into the star-level range of 4–5 WAR.
It’s in interesting move for the Cubs, who were not generally seen among the favorites to sign Suzuki heading into the interrupted offseason. After clearing the deck of veterans in 2021 to replenish their system with some very young prospects with very high upside, Chicago is projected to be finish in the low-70s in wins in 2022, with our current playoff odds setting their postseason chances at roughly one in 20. In other words: This is not a move for the present, but one for the latter half of Suzuki’s contract, when he’s hopefully producing in October.
In the short-term, the most interesting thing to watch will be what the Cubs do with incumbent right fielder Jason Heyward. With two years and $44 million left on his contract, he’s impossible to trade without an exceptionally large pay down, and the dynamics of having the most expensive fourth outfielder in baseball might provide some clubhouse challenges as well.
The Cubs are better in the immediacy, but not enough for it to really matter, yet the signing of Suzuki itself shows they have no intention of getting stuck in a rebuilding mode for very long.
Kevin Goldstein is a National Writer at FanGraphs.
Steamer projection: 142 wRC+
ZiPs projection: 124 OPS+
With the caveat that OPS =/= wRC, you can pretty easily figure out the discrepancy by looking at the OBPs. Steamer thinks his OBP is going to end up around .384; ZiPs around .351. That’s kind of like the difference between Mookie Betts and Jake Cronenworth.
Regardless, this deal makes a lot more sense to me than the Stroman one, which is fine in a vacuum but a little weird given that they’re mostly stocking up on the Rafael Ortegas and Clint Fraziers in the world. Suzuki might not be as good as the contract but he could be better, and at least his prime will overlap with that of Madrigal, Hoerner, and probably Brennan Davis.
They want to maintain some non-negligible probability of competing this year while also setting themselves up for more serious contention in 2023 and 2024. So, they’re buying where they see value, as they did with Stroman (Cubs seem to be more into that finesse profile than the league as a whole, so it made for a natural buying opportunity).
how dare you slight clint frazier! dude is gonna be good, just never got a real opportunity in a crowded yankees outfield.
Clint Frazier would have been for the Yankees if he hadn’t been concussed for much of his time there. I suspect that if he isn’t concussed he’ll be a valuable player for the Cubs, but not optimistic there.
Marcus Stroman will not meet the euphoric expectations of Cub nation. Just my opinion. Hitting in Wrigley vs Queens is much different. But have to agree on the blending of the prime of Suzuki with the rest of the Cub system.
I’ll be interested to see how the numbers compare for Bryant and Suzuki at year’s end in relation to their contracts.
Are we really worried whether he’ll outperform the deal? He’ll be better than the contract. Don’t bury that in the grand scheme of the sport this isn’t alot of money,
particularly since FA looks ugly af moving forward. FA is going to be a gd nightmare for all but the most obvious players, and there’s fewer and fewer of those as teams and their legions tighten up their always in progress algorithms…
Surely offloading Heyward somewhere is an option? He’s never been very good in CF, so he’s not all that useful as a 4th OF anyway, so I’m not sure actually. I was also a little surprised to see he’s never played LF in MLB.
Anyway, I guess I roundabout go to Heyward probably not being offloaded somehow. I like the signing for the Cubs though, and happy to see them not go entirely firesale mode.
At this point, think they give Heyward some run to try to prove he’s not completely washed and eat the money if he is to get use out of that roster spot. Really doubt they’d attach a prospect to him to get out of it at this point. Not when they’ve also apparently seriously considered absorbing Hosmer’s money to get Campusano or Hassell.
Heyward for Ozuna?
For the Cubs, you then flip Ozuna to a team willing to take him while the Cubs pay most of 22-23, but not 24, so you’re free of obligation the same time as you would be with Heyward. Hell, maybe the Braves throw $2 million in for his 24 salary to make that easier; but the Cubs may have to subsidize the deal, too, just depends on the perceived market for these guys. Would Ozuna for 3 years, $16 million, very backloaded, have excess value to another team? Probably not, but the Cubs only pay $30 million, and I doubt they could give Heyward away with $30 million.
The Braves get a right fielder while Acuña heals, platooning with Heredia, and after that, Rosario can DH and the outfield of Acuña, Duvall and Heyward/Heredia. Heyward is also known as a good clubhouse guy, was a fan favorite in Atlanta, and who knows, maybe he can finally find that magic (yes, very unlikely). The one place the Braves look good in the minors is OF, so if it doesn’t work out, it may not be the end of the world.
If the Braves are planning to cut Ozuna anyway (maybe), and the Cubs don’t mind the public relations hit (maybe) then it could work. Heyward going back to the Braves would definitely have some nostalgic value.
I briefly thought through whether the Dodgers would take him in exchange for Trevor Bauer but I cannot imagine anyone touching Bauer with a ten foot pole right now.
God no. I’d like to think Ozuna still has an inkling of value left
Take away the DV incident and you have a guy that played poorly for 2 months, showed he can’t play competent defense, got hurt, missed a couple months, then missed the rest of the season for non-baseball (in this formulation, an innocent reason). He’s a year older. What would that player get for 3 years? Would he get Eddie Rosario’s deal, but for 3 years? I’d say there is $20 million or so in negative value on Ozuna’s deal if he was a choir boy.
What would Heyward get on a two year deal if he were available? Brett Gardner got $7.5 for one year, so maybe Heyward could get $5 million per year on a two year deal? Yes, 2021 was terrible, but he was actually really good in 2020 and was the definition of an average player 2018-19. So that is $34 million in dead money. How much of that $14 million the Cubs would need to pay rather than the Braves absorb would depend on the value of bad PR. But ask yourself this. If Ozuna were just owed $14 million for this season only, would he even be on the Braves?
The Cubs could probably get the advantage of washing Ozuna through their team and get better value than the Braves could.
But if you disagree with my prognosis on Ozuna (not good), then maybe you see the downgrade to Heyward as too steep. I think Heyward is close to as valuable and also fits the Braves needs better and has never been filmed with his hands on a woman.
Ozuna is still more valuable than Heyward is, especially now that the NL has the DH. He’s now healthy and done with those legal issues, and those 2 months he hit poorly last year is the only time he’s been even close to a below-average hitter since 2015, and he’s still only 31 years old.
There’s no reason not to expect Ozuna to bounce back as a very good DH for some team (even if not the Braves) this season.
Also, you can’t make decisions about your future based on the fact that you still have Jason Heyward. That money is gone, so unless you want to do something like swap him for Madison Bumgarner or something you might as well proceed as though he’ll be a 4th outfielder (and even when trading for Bumgarner they’d still have to pay it down)
Bumgarner is a better hitter
I feel bad for this guy, how bad must his other offers have been that he signed with the 2022 Cubs? Does not inspire confidence that nobody else wanted him.
There were at least a half dozen teams interested.
Clearly nobody worth signing with offered him a deal, or he wouldn’t have signed with the Cubs, destined to be garbage for the next decade as their owners go adventuring with an English soccer team.
What are you talking about? He had about 85 million reasons to sign with the Cubs.
operate from a position that a player should want to sign somewhere other than a bargain basement franchise that doesn’t have any interest in competition, *unless* that team offers them a wildly above market contract.
See also Kris Bryant and the Colorado Rockies
You’re sadly mistaken. It’s a myth that professional athletes care primarily about playing on a winning team.
*unless* offered a wildly above market contract. Reading hard today?
It’s a wildly above market contract.
Projections for Seiya Suzuki were in the 4yr/40m – 5yr/55m range, so yes, the Cubs offered a wildly above-market contract.
Why are you wasting everyone’s time and bandwidth when you already answered your own question?
Why are any of us commenting on a baseball site? To talk about it, big brain.
Again, why do you feel the need to ask a question and then answer it yourself? The Cubs clearly blew projections out of the water with their offer, so it’s very obvious why they got the player, as you wrote yourself.
Again, why do you feel the need to comment? It’s very obvious, because you want to talk about it.
Are you seriously comparing the current state of the Cubs with the Rockies?!
The Cubs are the significantly better team right now, and unlike the Rockies should be back in contention in a couple of years if not next year, plus they actually have a decent front office.
I’m laughing. Though, the Cubs have a weird international appeal for some reason. I’ve seen caps all over the world- I wonder if that had some bearing. Their international reputation is better than their domestic one.
Well, you have to be known internationally first. The Cubs are probably top 5 in terms of visibility, behind the Yankees, Red Sox and Phillies, probably in the same tier as the Dodgers and Giants.
Phillies? I should think they’d probably be somewhere in the 11-20 range, well behind all the teams you mentioned as well as the Braves, Cardinals, Mets, etc.
History plays a big part in how well-known you are among people who don’t follow the MLB on a daily basis. The Phillies and Cubs have been around long enough in big enough cities and accumulated enough history.
Mets could well be in the bottom 5 in terms of international recognition, because of their short history, and living under the shadow of the Yankees. Nobody remembers the Braves in Milwaukee and Boston, so although they have their 1990s to stand on, they’re lacking in terms of generational memory. St. Louis is a tier above those two, but below the Cubs and Phillies because they play in a less prominent city.
Being in a prominent city doesn’t matter as much as you think it does. The Phillies were mostly terrible until they finally won a World Series in 1980 and didn’t have many marketable Hall of Fame players before then. Overall, they’ve only won two Championships after well over a century.
Meanwhile, the Cardinals have a history of an enormous Western fan base, the most WS Rings in the NL, and play in a city that loves baseball well out of proportion of its actual middling metro area population.
As for the Mets, while they haven’t been around as long in comparison, they still have just as many Championships as the Phillies despite such a disadvantage, have possessed a high number of well known stars, superstars, and colorful teams over the years they have existed (which is just over 60 years now), plus they are in New York City after all.
You are aware that the discussion is about international exposure, right?
Pissed off some Northsiders who refuse to acknowledge their team is trash, huh
Freddie, you sound like the pissed off troll, not anyone else, lol.
I’d say a bitter fan. We’ve all been there.
He’s a member, he’s cool. I do think he needs to take up a hobby though. Maybe running.
I must’ve missed the members are never assholes memo.
It’s true. Pony up for this site you’re using for free, and maybe you’ll understand.
Feel free to chime in when you pay for a membership.
Dan’s $83 million figure explicitly *included* the posting fee, so it wasn’t as close as people seem to think.
Do you plan to add Suzuki to THE BOARD, even though he is not a prospect in the traditional sense?
Y’all just forgot about the Bryant signing, or was it so far out of left field that you still racking brains to figure out how to write about it?
The Bryant signing is analyzed, appropriately, in an article about the Bryant signing.
Maybe I was pushing F5 too much that it wasn’t working.
I ignored this guy due to my Bryant bias, shoulda been both, but holy crap the Cubs got a whale
What does it say for the Future of FA that guys with baseball resume and impact ML skills like Stroman and Suzuki were non-threats for 9 figures? Once that international draft gets going, FA will be FUBAR. There’s too much noise, it sucks players this obviously good are so easy to bury in FA and it’s only just getting started (we don’t talk nearly enough about how teams are chipping away at playing time, dropping both short and long term earning potential)