Daily Notes: Feat. Actionable Counsel from the Readership
Table of Contents
Here’s the table of contents for today’s edition of the Daily Notes.
1. Actionable Counsel from the Readership
2. Today’s MLB.TV Free Game
3. Today’s Complete Schedule
Actionable Counsel from the Readership
Introduction
In yesterday’s edition of these Notes, the author introduced a new calculation for Team and Game NERD scores for September — one designed, that is, to reflect the influence of the playoffs and playoff odds on the watchability of games during that month. While entirely the product of what one would regard as “the college try” — or at least “the prestigious boarding-school try” — the author’s methodology, like the author himself, was poorly conceived.
“But, soft!” the author was occasioned to say later in the afternoon, however, while reading the comments to those same Notes. “What light through yonder blog post breaks? It is the east, and concerned reader Scott W is the sun.” Indeed, reader Scott W’s actual resemblance to a G-type main-sequence star remains, as yet, undetermined. His advice on the matter of NERD and playoff adjustments, however, was illuminating.
Actually, now that I put some thought into this myself, the formula should incorporate both the odds to win the division and the odds to win the wild card, since each of these are kinda exciting by themselves. That said, the wild card as a consolation prize for losing a close division battle is not incrementally exciting, so we need to make sure that the NERDs are not duplicative in this regard. So I propose the following formula (based on your excellent work).
A = the lesser of x) abs(50.0% – PO%) and y) abs(50.0% – DIV%)
B = 50.0% – A
September Team NERD = B * 20, then rounded to nearest integer value
Where:
PO% = the % chance of making the playoffs, and
DIV% = the % chance of winning the divisionSo if a team has a 40% chance of winning the division and a 40% chance of making the wildcard, then the divisional race is inherently more important since there is an 80% chance of making the playoffs – this gets you to a NERD of 8. Likewise, if a team has a 20% chance of the division and a 40% chance of a wildcard, then you use the fact that the team has a 60% chance of making the playoffs, also getting you to a NERD of 8.
“Brilliant!” says one. “Very polite!” replies another. “About to be plagiarized,” says/said a third — in this case, the author himself.
Indeed, what one finds below, so far as improved Team NERD scores are concerned, have been facilitated by reader Scott W’s very salient advice — and, it should also be noted, by the author’s own discovery of Excel’s MIN function. The new calculation does appear to more accurately reflect the actual level of excitement attendant to each team’s respective playoff odds — and addresses, in part at least, reader Straw Man’s suggestion that certain teams (the Indians and Yankees) ought to have Team NERD scores higher than 1.
Today’s MLB.TV Free Game
New York NL at Atlanta | 12:10 ET
Dillon Gee (166.1 IP, 108 xFIP-, 0.6 WAR) faces Kameron Loe (17.2 IP, 121 xFIP-, -1.1 WAR).
Readers’ Preferred Broadcast: New York NL Television.
Today’s Complete Schedule
Here’s the complete schedule for all of today’s games, with our very proprietary watchability (NERD) scores for each one. Pitching probables and game times aggregated from MLB.com and RotoWire.
Note: the following table is entirely sortable.
| Away | SP | Tm. | Gm. | Tm. | SP | Home | Time | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dillon Gee | NYN | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | ATL | Kameron Loe* | 12:10 |
| Liam Hendriks | MIN | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | HOU | Jordan Lyles | 14:10 |
| Brian Flynn* | MIA | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 | CHN | Jeff Samardzija | 14:20 |
| Yu Darvish | TEX | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 4 | OAK | Jarrod Parker | 15:35 |
| Mark Buehrle | TOR | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | AZ | Randall Delgado | 15:40 |
| Tim Lincecum | SF | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | SD | Eric Stults | 18:40 |
| Zach Britton | BAL | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | CLE | Zach McAllister | 19:05 |
| Erik Johnson* | CHA | 8 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | NYA | CC Sabathia | 19:05 |
| J. Zimmermann | WAS | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | PHI | Roy Halladay | 19:05 |
| Rick Porcello | DET | 8 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | BOS | Ryan Dempster | 19:10 |
| Shelby Miller | STL | 9 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 5 | CIN | Bronson Arroyo | 19:10 |
| Francisco Liriano | PIT | 9 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 6 | MIL | Wily Peralta | 20:10 |
| Taijuan Walker | SEA | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | KC | Ervin Santana | 20:10 |
| Edinson Volquez | LAN | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | COL | Jorge de la Rosa | 20:40 |
| J. Hellickson | TB | 4 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 | LAA | Jered Weaver | 22:05 |
To learn how Pitcher and Team NERD Scores are calculated, click here.
To learn how Game NERD Scores are calculated, click here.
* = Fewer than 20 IP, NERD at discretion of very handsome author.
Carson Cistulli has published a book of aphorisms called Spirited Ejaculations of a New Enthusiast.
For those interested and unaware, today the Pittsburgh Pirates baseball club takes on their Milwaukee counterpart to vie for their first 82nd win in two decades. It would seem somewhat fitting if these PBC Pirates achieved that 82nd win against the Milwaukee team as some of *the* very worst moments of that twenty year march through the quagmire of futility occurred in the very city that tonight’s action transpires in. Francisco Liriano and his 9 NERD will take the ball for the Bucs. I personally declare FGs * 4 * Gamescore in error — a possible typo meant to read * 14 *.
Well. Shoot.
This is less subjective now than previous iterations of NERD. Ideally they would feature some kind of still-sliding scale. The concept that once a team ceases to have a chance to play in the postseason that they immediately warrant a team score of zero, seems flawed. Perhaps an addendum could be added to account for the number of rostered rookie-eligible players are on their 25-man roster.
Basically it seems strange to me that the Astros became less watchable when they mathematically lost their chance to make the playoffs they never had a chance of making.
How in the world is Kameron Loe starting a game that isn’t in spring training for a playoff team?
How in the world did Kameron Loe get a 5 NERD? Is it that much fun watching such failure?
I’m having trouble figuring out which game would be the best to watch tonight based on NERD. Really tough decision.
I’m failing to understand how the Baltimore-Cleveland game could be a 2 NERD.
Carson, I appreciate the kind words, and was happy to help. However, to clarify one thing for the record: if you were to ask my wife about my “actual resemblance to a G-type main-sequence star,” her response would be something along the lines of “No, he does not resemble such celestial object, because my dear husband has lost all of his twinkle over the years that I have enjoyed his company”. Of course, she would say this not nearly as eloquently as the above (i.e., her expected quote), and probably more along the lines of a comment with similar meaning written on a Yahoo! Message Board, or maybe MLBTR.com.
Concern with the new addition is the loss of variation. Now pretty much every game has become a 1-4. Would prefer a playoff odds bonus so as to properly distinguish between other games.
The way to incorporate playoff odds is to determine a “leverage index” for games similar to WPA’s leverage index. Here, for each game you can run simulations for how much league-wide odds of getting to the divisional series differ with each team winning (league-wide divisional series odds means that if the Cardinals play the Brewers, you account for the interest to Pirates fans — if the Cardinals lose the Pirates have a better chance to take the division and thus to play in the divisional series, which is certainly important, and of course not as important as if the Pirates play the Cardinals straight-up).