Dave Cameron FanGraphs Chat – 11/26/14

11:10
Dave Cameron: Happy Thanksgiving, everyone. Let’s be thankful for an hour or so of baseball conversation.

11:10
Dave Cameron: The queue is now open.

12:03
Comment From Bret
A couple of reports out of Toronto are that the Jays have given Melky Cabrera a deadline to respond to their offer (believed to be 3-years / $39M) by the Winter Meetings. If you were Melky’s agent, do you advise him to take it?

12:03
Dave Cameron: Yeah. I don’t think he’s worth any more than that.

12:04
Comment From Cicero
Since Cargo and Tulo are unlikely to return value until health is more sure, shouldn’t the Rockies at least look to move Morneau, Stubbs and Rosario?

12:04
Dave Cameron: I disagree with the premise. I would bet several teams would pay for Tulo’s upside, even coming off the surgery.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

12:04
Comment From AJ Preller
I made a run at Pablo Sandoval but it didn’t work out. What should I do now?

12:05
Dave Cameron: Be happy that your first attempt at a big move failed. If your sold on Tomas as a reasonable outfielder, he could make sense for them, but the focus should be on young player collection, not chasing aging free agents.

12:06
Comment From Bookie Metts
If it was your call, would you start the season with Betts or Victorino in RF? What do you think the Sox will do?

12:06
Dave Cameron: I’d imagine Betts/Castillo/Victorino will split CF/RF between them, so none of them are everyday guys. There’s no reason to have a clear starter/backup delineation there.

12:07
Comment From Joe C.
What type of bread do you use in your stuffing?

12:07
Dave Cameron: My in-laws live 20 minutes away, so my mother-in-law makes most of the main dishes. I’m responsible for cranberry sauce and orange rolls this year.

12:08
Comment From Joe C.
Brined and roasted turkey, or deep fried?

12:08
Dave Cameron: I’ve actually never had a deep fried turkey, despite living in the land of deep fried everything. I assume it’s probably pretty good, given that it’s fried and all.

12:08
Comment From The Oberamtmann
I’m guessing the Yanks get Headley, McCarthy and Drew (the last on a one-year deal). Does that sound right? Sadly, I don’t think they keep Robertson. If that’s their offseason, good or bad? Do you think that is what happens?

12:09
Dave Cameron: Report this morning said Yankees won’t go past three years for Headley. If that’s true, he goes elsewhere. And I wouldn’t be surprised if McCarthy was a pretty hot item after Lester signs, so they might not get him back either.

12:10
Comment From Northsider
The Marlins are looking for someone at 1B. Do you think they are looking for a veteran presence or a cost-controlled young player due to Stanton’s massive contract?

12:10
Dave Cameron: They made an offer to LaRoche, so it seems like more the former.

12:10
Comment From Ray
Happy Thanksgiving, Dave. What can the Dodgers expect in return for Matt Kemp now that Hanley Ramirez and Pablo Sandoval are off the market?

12:11
Dave Cameron: Hanley’s signing hurts them, I think. They’re trying to sell Kemp at 5/$107M, while Hanley only got 4/$88M. They’re going to have to eat money to move that contract, and Hanley getting less than what Kemp owed won’t help them make the claim othewrise.

12:12
Comment From Mike89
Any chance Niese or Gee could get a decent for SS for the Mets?

12:12
Dave Cameron: I don’t think so.

12:12
Comment From David
in your blockbuster – Why wouldn’t the Nats just send Souza to Seattle for Miller? Souza by all accounts is MLB ready and has power and speed. Would it be an overpay? seems like it could be a good match?

12:13
Dave Cameron: The goal of the trade for the Nationals would be to add to their long-term talent base. Swapping Souza for Miller would just move things around, and they’d still be facing a big drain this winter.

12:13
Comment From Manager General
Were the Red Sox signings simply a case of act now, ask questions later? So basically, secure the top FA bats out of the gate and use the next few months to figure out the rest?

12:13
Dave Cameron: I would assume they already have a pretty decent idea of what the trade market for Cespedes and others look like, and they decided they’d rather buy bats and trade for arms than pay the market price for pitching.

12:14
Comment From Happy Fun Ball
What’s with the scenic vista in the background? Did you pick that, or is CoverItLive trying to brighten our day?

12:14
Dave Cameron: That was a CIL addition. Apparently they’re trying to make the chat more cheery.

12:15
Comment From Guest
are the mariners still in on Tomas after signing Seager?

12:15
Dave Cameron: Seager extension won’t change their off-season plan at all; odds are they structured the deal so that he still gets the same amount he would have gotten in arbitration.

12:16
Comment From striker
You’ve mentioned before that offense ages better than defense. Can you provide me with a better understanding as to why?

12:17
Dave Cameron: Defense is based more on physical skills like speed and athleticism. Offense is based more on experience that is developed through repetition. Players get to the big leagues as good athletes, and lean more towards defense than offense early. They become better hitters as they see more pitching and adopt a better approach, which helps offset the decline in physical skills as they get older.

12:17
Comment From AL
Assuming health, who do you think is manning second next season for the rangers, Profar or Odor?

12:18
Dave Cameron: Whichever one they don’t trade for a pitcher or an outfielder.

12:18
Comment From Eric
Melky’s projection of 1.7 wins seems a little light. Is it possible it is being weighed down to heavily by his 2013 year where he was clearly hampered by a tumor in his spine?

12:19
Dave Cameron: Sure. Forecasts aren’t well equipped to handle performances which are caused by injuries, so you could argue that Steamer is underrating Cabrera a bit. Even with that adjustment, though, he’s still not a great player.

12:19
Comment From Ceej
Seeing what Hanley and Sandoval got, wouldn’t the Sox had been better off signing only 1 and beating the Cards trade for Heyward?

12:19
Dave Cameron: With what? They already traded all their pitching away.

12:20
Comment From AL
Can you please explain to me why the Brewers would rather have Adam Lind than Adam Laroche? I’m assuming that it’s monetary, but the difference is small for a full time player vs a platoon guy. Plus they would still have a useful long relief guy.

12:20
Dave Cameron: The difference between $25 million over two years and $7.5 million over one year is small?

12:21
Comment From Chris
If the Red Sox bring in a star pitcher either through free agency or trade, where does that leave the Phillies regarding Cole Hamels? Do they just wait til July to make a move at that point, or are there other trade partners available now?

12:22
Dave Cameron: My guess is Hamels doesn’t get traded this winter. Amaro’s perception of his value and his actual value are quite different, and he’ll probably wait until the trade deadline to hope a contender is desperate. He just better hope that Hamels doesn’t get injured and nuke all his value, following the Cliff Lee path.

12:22
Comment From Nick
Your trade proposal between the Sox-Mariners and Nationals is a complete joke. Obviously written through a Mariners fan boy eyes. Miller sucks and so does Hultzen.

12:23
Dave Cameron: It’s funny how every time I mention Brad Miller’s name, a legion of people mock and laugh, yet no one has ever put together any real cognizant argument for why a 25 year old SS who can hit at a league average level is actually not a good player.

12:24
Comment From Ceej
Based on what you know, how much would you want your favorite team to pay for Moncada? I’m a Bucco fan, but it’s fun to dream.

12:24
Dave Cameron: If he’s really the kind of talent that would go #1 overall in the draft, he’s worth $100 million.

12:25
Dave Cameron: The tricky thing is that because of the rules for under-22 international players, he can’t sign a major league deal, so any team buying his rights is just paying a signing bonus, and will have to add in his future salaries on top of that. Toss in the 100% tax that will be applied, and my guess is the winning bid ends up near $40 million.

12:26
Comment From JJB
Phillies would need to pay home much $ in order for a Hamels-for-Betts swap to work?

12:26
Dave Cameron: All of it. $110 million. And even then, I’m not sure Boston should do it.

12:27
Comment From vztaxes
Liked your FG on Fox article. What’s the math that equalizes trading players a year from free agency and cost controlled players under control for multiple years? How do you make it balance?

12:28
Dave Cameron: It depends on the team, and how much of a discount they’re putting on future wins. For a team like Seattle, they’re probably going to put a significant discount on those wins, given their desire to win while Cano/Felix/Iwakuma are still elite players. A team like Washington might put a much smaller discount on future wins in relation to current wins, given how much of an edge they have over the rest of their division

12:29
Comment From David
Think a Tyler Moore for one of the multiple, but not great pedigree SP from the marlins

12:29
Dave Cameron: Moore won’t fetch an SP. He’s pretty close to waiver bait.

12:30
Comment From Guest
Is it possible we’re seeing inflation at different rates in different markets? Even if total money flowing into the game stays the same, as long-term extensions of players who haven’t hit the free agent market increase, free agent salaries might increase, as the player supply becomes smaller than in the semi-recent past?

12:31
Dave Cameron: Maybe, but player demand will also go down. For every player who isn’t a free agent anymore, that means there’s also a team not looking to sign a player at that position.

12:31
Comment From Bruce
If the Marlins put Stanton on Waivers right now, how many teams would line up to take that contract?

12:32
Dave Cameron: All of them. Everyone could afford his salary for the next few years, and the teams who can’t afford the long-term cost would just extract the present value and then dump him after 2017 or so.

12:32
Comment From Happy Fun Ball
But the Nats have a surplus in the OF. Souza (or M Taylor) for Miller (or C. Taylor) gives them the INF upgrade they need, and would still allow them to flip Zimmerman to someone else in another deal if they really wanted to.

12:33
Dave Cameron: I think Souza is lined up to replace Span in the OF next year. If you’re looking at your 2016 roster, Souza isn’t replaceable.

12:33
Dave Cameron: At least not easily.

12:33
Dave Cameron: That doesn’t mean I don’t think it’s worth considering, but I don’t think it’s the kind of move the Nationals are trying to make.

12:34
Comment From vivalajeter
Syndergaard for Profar?

12:34
Dave Cameron: Don’t think the Mets would do that, given Profar’s health questions.

12:34
Comment From BassmanUW
To me, I think the odds of Lester going back to the Red Sox are vastly overstated. He might go back there if they are tied as the highest bidder, or maybe if they’re really minimally below that, but if he was so intent on signing there, he wouldn’t be going on the US tour. Not that the Red Sox won’t get him, but at certain points over the last week it’s been discussed as a foregone conclusion by some. Agree?

12:35
Dave Cameron: I agree that it’s not a foregone conclusion. I think he takes the most money, and that might not come from Boston.

12:35
Comment From moneyballmaher
Do you think Devon Travis will be starting 2b for the blue jays next year?

12:35
Dave Cameron: By the all-star break, yes. Probably not on Opening Day.

12:35
Comment From Kirby Wilson
Does the amount of innings that James Shields has pitched in recent years help his value because he is seen as a workhorse or hurt it because it seems like he has too many miles on him?

12:36
Dave Cameron: Both.

12:36
Comment From Manager General
Can you elaborate why Melky gets so little love around town? I’m a big Jays fan and thought he was a huge bright spot for the club last season. I don’t expect him to be a top-10 OF by any means, but 3-yr/$39 million seems like a solid deal for the Jays. Thanks!

12:37
Dave Cameron: He’s a one trick pony, so you’re betting entirely on the bat, and he doesn’t exactly have a consistent track record of hitting every year. If the bat regresses, he’s basically worthless, and there’s too much risk in the offensive performance to pay a significant contract for him.

12:38
Comment From Sam
How realistic would a Matt Kemp to Mariners trade be?

12:39
Dave Cameron: If Kemp gets traded, it’s probably the most likely option.

12:39
Comment From Jason
The Sox traded all their pitching? You mean besides Owens, E.Rodriguez, B. Johnson, Barnes, Ranaudo, de la Rosa, and Webster? Aren’t there some relatively strong prospects there?

12:39
Dave Cameron: The Braves didn’t want pitching prospects; they wanted a guy who could pitch in their rotation right now.

12:40
Comment From Starlin Castro
“a 25 year old SS who can hit at a league average level is actually not a good player.” Wait a minute, this sounds a year older than someone I know who you constantly call an unimpressive player…

12:42
Dave Cameron: Miller and Castro are three months apart, actually. And I think it’s pretty clear that Miller’s the better player; he’s a dramatically better baserunner and he doesn’t have Castro’s defensive lapses. And Castro is owed ~$40 million over the next five years, while Mliler will probably get about ~$15 million during the same time period.

12:43
Comment From Nick
Miller: .221/280/389 with terrible defense = Not good.

12:45
Dave Cameron: His career line is .241/.302/.389, which after you adjust for Safeco Field, is roughly league average. His defense at short is just fine. He’s a very good baserunner. Since he got to the big leagues, he’s basically been Jimmy Rollins. http://www.fangraphs.com/le…

12:46
Dave Cameron: J.J. Hardy got 3/40 for his decline years in the midst of a season where he posted a 90 wRC+. You really have to have your head in the sand to think that this skillset isn’t valued by big league teams.

12:47
Comment From Dan Duquette
If I’m offered Andrew Heaney straight up for Chris Davis, I take it in a second, right?

12:47
Dave Cameron: Without hesitation.

12:48
Comment From Mike
Trying to settle a debate with a friend: who would you rather give a 6 year contract to – Jon Lester this year or Jordan Zimmerman next year?

12:48
Dave Cameron: Probably Zimmermann, but it depends on the AAV too.

12:48
Comment From Sean
what kind of market could the Nats get for Denard Span? He’s in the same boat as Zimmermann/Fister/Clippard/Desmond as a 1 year guy and IMO he’s the one who they could replace the easiest (Souza/Taylor in the wings).

12:49
Dave Cameron: This is not a good winter to be selling a center fielder, so probably not enough to do it.

12:50
Comment From Humpty+Dumpty
What do the Sox do at 1st if they move Napoli to clear money? Is it sandoval there? Hanley?

12:50
Dave Cameron: Nava/Craig platoon.

12:51
Comment From Pirates Hurdles
Starlin Castro who has 3 – 3 win seasons in his career already is a worse player than Brad Miller, seems a bit delusional Dave. You can argue contract value, but head to head, come on man.

12:52
Dave Cameron: Castro has a career 98 wRC+, is projected for 101 next year. Miller has a career 95 wRC+, is projected for a 102 next year.

12:52
Dave Cameron: Miller is the better baserunner and defender.

12:53
Comment From Starlin Castro
I’ve got a career -3.1 UZR/150 to Miller’s 1.1; I’ve proven that I can be a consistent 110 wRC+ or so hitter as compared to Miller’s 86 last season; and my BsR is projected by Steamer to be -.6 to Miller’s .8. I’d say it’s far from “clear” that he’s better than me, even I agree that I’m not the stud everyone thinks I am.

12:53
Dave Cameron: A consistent 110 wRC+ hitter with a career number of 98? You’ve topped 110 once in five years.

12:54
Comment From Pirates Hurdles
Come on, Hardy was an established MLB starter, Miller had 1/2 of a good debut season the regressed a ton. apples and oranges.

12:54
Dave Cameron: He “regressed a ton” and was still a league average player. At 24.

12:56
Comment From Jim
Is there any legitimate argument against Pedro getting voted in first ballot?

12:56
Dave Cameron: No.

12:56
Comment From Eric
Do you think the presence of Devon Travis should keep AA from going out and acquiring a top infielder rather than (at minimum) a stop-gap? The relatively high probability of injuries with Reyes/Lawrie along with Travis still probably being a ways off makes me think Headley would be such a perfect target / fit.

12:57
Dave Cameron: Headley could be a good fit. Given Lawrie’s health problems, I wouldn’t avoid signing a smart deal for Headley.

12:57
Comment From CC
Is there any explanation for why the very best hitters in history have been left handed (Ruth, Bonds, Williams, Cobb, Gehrig), or is it just noise?

12:57
Dave Cameron: They get the platoon advantage more often.

12:58
Comment From Marcus A.
What number do you think is “fair” for Tomas? It seems like there’s so much risk and so much we don’t know, but the upside will still tantalize.

12:58
Dave Cameron: If he’s what scouts are saying he is — an above average slugger with meh defense and baserunning — than he’s probably a +2 to +3 WAR guy, but young enough to potentially improve some. That’s probably worth $80-$100 million, maybe more if you think his defense isn’t a big negative.

12:59
Comment From Josh
Castro’s WRC+ by year: 99, 109, 100, 72, 115. I will say you’re putting an awful lot of stock in that 72 when citing his career total.

1:00
Dave Cameron: He’s been almost exactly average twice, above average twice, and terrible once. That’s the profile of a guy you should project to be close to average. Maybe you think he should project for a 105 wRC+ instead of 101? Beyond that, you’re not putting enough weight on the bulk of his career.

1:01
Comment From AL
Thanks for wasting 20 minutes on defending Brad Miller.

1:01
Dave Cameron: You’re weclome!

1:02
Dave Cameron: Alright, off to grab some lunch and start the Thanksgiving cookery. Enjoy the holidays everyone.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
carson newton
11 years ago

Giants sign Tomas and Shieldals. Thoughts?

Will
11 years ago

Hello Dave of all the stolen base potential dynamos I like Mookie Betts the best. Great walk rate and probably will bat leadoff in a good line up. I’m thinking 100 runs .300 BA upside 40 50 steals your thoughts?

M@tt
11 years ago
Reply to  Will

I’m not Dave but Betts, although with 40 steals over 3 levels last year, currently has playing time concerns so projections must be conservative.

Let’s put it this way if you tripled his ’14 MLB sample and crossed your fingers for no sophomore slump/jinx you’d get:

639 PA, 102R, 15HR, 54 RBI, 21 SB

If you punch the same 639 PA into the current Steamer projection you’d get:

639 PA, 87R, 13 HR, 67 RBI, 27 SB

Rick
11 years ago

20 minutes splitting hairs between two middling SS, classic offseason chat.

Lawyer
11 years ago
Reply to  Rick

At least we know Dave is happy to downplay projections when they show two players to be comparable in ways that he wanted clear superiority, and fully embrace projections if they say what he wants even when we can assume the inputs are a little wonky!

djw
11 years ago
Reply to  Lawyer

I don’t get it–what’s wonky about the inputs for Miller?

chuckb
11 years ago
Reply to  Lawyer

What the he’ll are you talking about? It’s incredibly frustrating to try to follow these chats when morons are inundating the chat with non – questions, just arguing for the sale of arguing. You’ve got 2 players who play the same position, with basically identical career and projected wRC+, and one is clearly better than the other defensively and on the bases. That one, the better one, is also much cheaper.

I get asking for clarification. It’s just trolling to pepper him, and waste half the chat, by making ridiculous arguments as to why those clear facts don’t apply. And who gives a damn anyway if Castro is better than Miller? The Cubs aren’t trading Castro.

Some of you think you’re smarter than Dave or the other authors here. The problem is you rarely, if ever, offer any evidence to support your claims and when you do, it’s piss-poor, like arguing that 80% of Castro’s seasons don’t count, for example.

You, and others like you, need too spend less time trolling and blathering and more time reading and listening. You’re not nearly as smart as you think you are. The evidence that that’s true is in your lack of supporting evidence in your passive – aggressive complaint above.

Costanza
11 years ago
Reply to  chuckb

Boy do I ever agree. That’s why I’m working on a Chrome extension that will let you create a banlist of commenter names, and will just remove them from your view. Presto changeo, and fangraphs is back to its previous level of awesomeness!

Dovif
11 years ago

Cubs fans were out in force. Castro is a average ss who has made very little improvement since he came up. He is an above average hitter but is below average defensively and have limited range and his base stealing is all but gone. He is a average ss at best

Lawyer
11 years ago
Reply to  Dovif

To be sure, the annoyance from this non-Cubs fan was more calling Miller good in light of Dave’s well-worn dislike for Castro. Miller put up an 86 wRC+ last year, a 1.6 BsR, and his career UZR150 is 1.1 (only two seasons but it’s the best we can do). That’s not particularly good at defense or base running, and that’s quite bad at hitting. A bit incongruous to call that “good” but consistently call Castro bad, when the latter is a marginally worse baserunner/defender but a decently better hitter.

djw
11 years ago
Reply to  Lawyer

What motive would you have for using two seasons to evaluate his defensive ability, but only one to evaluate offense? Especially when that season has an improbably low babip for his speed and batted ball profile? It seems like you’re cherry-picking to make him look as bad as possible, as opposed to Dave looking at all the data.

chuckb
11 years ago
Reply to  Lawyer

Incongruous is using career numbers at some times and 1 year numbers at others to fit your preset argument. You’re just arguing for the sale of arguing and are too stubborn to see that the facts don’t support your argument.

KK-Swizzle
11 years ago
Reply to  Dovif

This really isn’t that complicated, or a case of Dave being biased…Miller is projected for more WAR in less playing time.

I think its is a classic case of comparing an overrated player with an underrated player due to park effects, skill set, and size of market.

Nate
11 years ago
Reply to  KK-Swizzle

The projections also don’t make a lot of sense if you have actually watched them play. 2013 was a big mental adjustment period for Castro, and he should continue to get better as he enters his prime. The “mental lapses” for the most part no longer exist and his defense continued to improve as the year went on. He has gotten bigger and stronger which has worsened his range, but at the same time, improved his offense power.Steamer projects Castro to only play in 130 games next year, which really doesn’t make a lot of sense. He injured himself at the end of last season, but he is a known workhorse who prides himself only playing pretty much every game and has never been injury prone. It also predicts that his average, and ISO will drop. In the weeks leading up to his injury, Castro was playing his best baseball of his career and was locked in at the plate. The confusion from 2013 was entirely gone. I have no doubt he will prove the Steamer projection wrong again this season.

Biltmore
11 years ago
Reply to  Nate

It also seems a bit analytically wrongheaded to not consider these things. A year where you had rough luck and a low BABIP in your first full season at 24? Project up. A lost year for your team in which you were coached a certain way at age 23, before coming back at 24 and hitting better than ever? Project down.

I realize it’s hard to code for the latter, but that year wasn’t exactly a best-shape-of-his-life type of non-story; he was essentially being told to throw all curveballs at the major league level.

Costanza
11 years ago
Reply to  Nate

Joe Morgan, is that you?

Look, if you’re able to beat the accuracy of the projections because you have such a talented eye and scouting skillset, more power to you.

However, don’t expect me to put any stock in what you’ve seen. There’s no way for you to build the authority for it to be a convincing argument.

So, if you are indeed a skilled scout, it really doesn’t matter unless you can convey your knowledge in objective facts.

I can just as easily say, “I’ve seen Castro play. He has mental lapses and doesn’t care about his results, and it’s getting worse. In fact, I’d say he got lucky last year and in 2015 he will go back to being the worst player in baseball.” But it doesn’t actually make a good argument — it’s just each of us saying our opinions, which, lest ye forget, are a lot like assholes.

Buford
11 years ago
Reply to  Nate

‘The “mental lapses” FOR THE MOST PART no longer exist …’
Translation: This guy still plays with his head up his butt!

Going forward, you may want to refrain from using the word “pride” in any description of this airhead until his “mental lapses” in whole vanish … the same day the sun rises in the West, I imagine.

earlmanwich
11 years ago

thank you, dave. your complete inability to realize that you have a MASSIVE blindspot to the mariners is the gift that keeps on giving. your complete refusal to reevaluate your positions in the face of persistent criticism is something i am thankful for this holiday season.

never change.

Jeff SullivanMember since 2022
11 years ago
Reply to  earlmanwich

many Mariners fans think Dave hates the Mariners

earlmanwich
11 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

well, he’s generally incapable of separating his fandom for the mariners from rational analysis – see him giving up on the season in the first, what was it, two weeks?

Lawyer
11 years ago
Reply to  earlmanwich

Lol really.

Some Guy
11 years ago

Don’t hate on Dave, he is smarter than you.

Miller – Steamer projected 2.3 WAR over 107 games.
Castro – Steamer projected 2.1 WAR over 130 games.

Charles Bengal Tiger
11 years ago

Somebody should clue the Mariners in about those Steamer projections since apparently they don’t even consider Miller their starting SS.