David Bell Has a Problem Any Manager Would Love to Solve

The Reds have had many problems over their long and convoluted history, but few so wonderful as this: They have more good infielders than they can use. And not just good, but young, and mostly on pre-arbitration deals. The oldest and most expensive, Jeimer Candelario, they’ve just signed to a three-year, $45 million contract. He’s only 30, and coming off a season in which he posted a 117 wRC+.
The other six guys include a recent rookie of the year, Jonathan India, and five talented youngsters age 26 or younger: Spencer Steer, Elly De La Cruz, Matt McLain, Christian Encarnacion-Strand, and Noelvi Marte. Steer had a cameo at the end of 2022, but the other four got their first taste of major league action last year and performed somewhere between competently and superbly.
Here’s the sum total, with each player’s stats from last season:
| Player | Age | Position | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt McLain | 24 | 2B/SS | 403 | .290 | .357 | .507 | 128 | 3.2 |
| Jeimer Candelario | 30 | 3B/1B | 576 | .251 | .336 | .471 | 117 | 3.3 |
| Jonathan India | 27 | 2B | 529 | .244 | .338 | .407 | 99 | 1.2 |
| Elly De La Cruz | 22 | SS/3B | 427 | .235 | .300 | .410 | 84 | 1.7 |
| Noelvi Marte | 22 | 3B | 123 | .316 | .366 | .456 | 120 | 0.7 |
| Christian Encarnacion-Strand | 24 | 1B/3B | 241 | .270 | .328 | .477 | 112 | 0.5 |
| Spencer Steer | 26 | 3B/1B/OF | 665 | .271 | .356 | .464 | 118 | 2.1 |
Reds manager David Bell addressed the media on Tuesday, and sure enough the topic of this glut of young talent came up. How he works this problem through will be the most interesting part of the Reds’ season — perhaps the most interesting storyline in the entire NL Central.
Bell is entering his sixth season as Reds manager, and in that time he’s never finished more than four games over .500 with a series of mostly underfunded rosters. He’s made the playoffs only once, in 2020; that year, the Reds were the no. 7 seed in the only season in baseball history in which that would’ve been good enough for a playoff berth. Once there, they got swept by the Braves in the first round, and didn’t even manage to score a run in the process.
But last season, buoyed largely by this same exciting crop of infielders, the Reds were in the playoff race well into late September. With no obvious runaway favorite for the division title, Cincinnati enters the season with more serious playoff aspirations than in any year of Bell’s tenure to this point.
If not for the pressure to win now, Bell could privilege his younger, higher-upside infielders in the battle for playing time, with no fear of negative repercussions. Arguably, that’s what he did with De La Cruz last season, even tough the gigantic shortstop tired and struggled down the stretch.
Now, Bell has to balance playing time for seven players who need to fit into six spots in the lineup. And he needs to do it while maximizing his odds of winning each game, while at the same time not compromising the development of his young players, especially De La Cruz, who will need to work through their struggles in order to reach their ultimate ceilings.
It’ll be a tricky balance to strike, unless one of four things happens. In increasing order of likelihood:
1. The Reds lobby MLB to change the rules to place a fourth base on the infield between now and Opening Day, opening a spot in the lineup.
2. The Reds’ R&D department’s years of research into subquantum kinetics and temporal mechanics finally bear fruit in the form of a working time machine, which Bell uses to travel back to 2018 and convince India to learn how to play catcher.
3. One of the players involved gets traded. God knows the Reds tried to move India, but now that he’s been signed to a two-year contract extension, it seems that ship is at least in the process of sailing.
4. Someone gets hurt or stops hitting. It’d make the Reds worse, but it’d make filling out the lineup card easier. Marte is already recovering from an offseason hamstring injury, but I’d be astonished if he isn’t ready to go Opening Day.
There is good news. Everyone in the Reds’ infield rotation can play multiple positions, and there are multiple players who can cover every infield position. The Reds also don’t have an entrenched, incumbent designated hitter or a regular left fielder from outside this crop of players. And by spreading seven players across six positions — the four infield spots, DH, and left field — the Reds can give everyone a starter’s playing time. Last season, Cincinnati allocated a total of 4,134 plate appearances to those six positions. Split seven ways, that’s 590 PA and change.
So how do those plate appearances get divided up?
Let’s start with what Bell and president of baseball ops Nick Krall actually said. De La Cruz will be the everyday shortstop, which is logical. Last year, he was the worst hitter of these seven players statistically, but given that De La Cruz also posted a maximum exit velocity of 119.2 mph, the hope is that he doesn’t stay that way for long. Even if he does remain a mid-80s wRC+ hitter, De La Cruz has the tools — excellent range and one of the best throwing arms in the sport at any position — to carry that level of offense and still be an average-or-better shortstop.
The Reds should give De La Cruz all the playing time he can handle, because he’s the best defender at the hardest position, and would benefit most from reps. McLain will start at second and spell De La Cruz at short; he was the team’s best all-around infielder last year, and has earned a starter’s playing time.
Steer, who played 45 games in the outfield in 2023, will play in the outfield corners. And roping him in (I’m sorry, I couldn’t help it) with this group will open up an additional spot in the lineup. Steer played more games at first base than anywhere else in 2023, and is also capable of playing at second and third, though I doubt he’d be needed much there.
The one drawback to using this group to fill in left field: Encarnacion-Strand has played 10 innings in the outfield in his professional career. Apart from Steer, that’s the totality of this group’s professional outfield experience. But in general, anyone who can play second or third can probably hack it in left, and both Encarnacion-Strand and India are going to get some outfield reps in spring training.
India has actually never played anywhere but second base in the major leagues, which surprised me, but he played a ton of third base in college and filled in at shortstop from time to time in the minors. If he can develop into a legitimate utilityman, capable of playing second base and the four corners, he’ll find his way into plenty of games.
There are two further considerations, which weren’t reported as part of Krall and Bell’s comments on Tuesday: Candelario is going to play every day. Nobody signs a $15 million-a-year, multi-year contract to be part of a platoon, particularly not with a team that doesn’t give out many $15 million-a-year contracts to begin with. And Marte should get preferential treatment in terms of playing time. Just as with De La Cruz, younger, inexperienced players need to play consistently in order to develop.
So based on those considerations, here’s how the Reds ought to line up. This is basically the working assumption on our depth charts at RosterResource as well:
| Position | Starter | Backups | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1B | Candelario | Encarnacion-Strand | Steer | India |
| 2B | McLain | India | Steer | |
| 3B | Marte | Candelario | India | Steer |
| SS | De La Cruz | McLain | ||
| LF | Steer | India | Encarnacion-Strand | |
| DH | India | Candelario | Encarnacion-Strand | Steer |
The challenge for Bell, then, will be picking the spots to insert Encarnacion-Strand and India into the lineup. Let’s look at how everyone stacks up in terms of platoon advantage:
| vs. LHP | Bats | PA | BB% | K% | AVG | OBP | SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| De La Cruz | B | 122 | 4.1 | 40.2 | .184 | .231 | .263 |
| McLain | R | 101 | 7.9 | 20.8 | .326 | .386 | .609 |
| Candelario | B | 161 | 9.3 | 22.4 | .254 | .342 | .451 |
| India | R | 134 | 11.2 | 26.9 | .207 | .306 | .336 |
| Steer | R | 180 | 9.4 | 18.3 | .313 | .378 | .550 |
| Marte* | R | 142 | 11.3 | 15.5 | .303 | .387 | .393 |
| Encarnacion-Strand | R | 60 | 10.0 | 25.0 | .259 | .333 | .352 |
| vs. RHP | Bats | PA | BB% | K% | AVG | OBP | SLG |
| De La Cruz | B | 305 | 9.8 | 31.1 | .255 | .328 | .471 |
| McLain | R | 302 | 7.6 | 31.1 | .278 | .348 | .473 |
| Candelario | B | 415 | 9.2 | 21.9 | .251 | .333 | .479 |
| India | R | 395 | 9.4 | 18.5 | .257 | .349 | .432 |
| Steer | R | 485 | 10.5 | 21.9 | .256 | .348 | .431 |
| Marte* | R | 380 | 9.2 | 19.2 | .282 | .350 | .477 |
| Encarnacion-Strand | R | 181 | 4.4 | 29.8 | .274 | .326 | .518 |
I’ve included Marte’s minor league numbers not because I think his experience at Double-A is comparable to the other players’ major league competition, but because he only played 35 games in the majors and it’s hard to tell anything about a player’s tendencies in that small a sample.
Here’s what we can tell: Candelario is basically the same from both sides of the plate, while De La Cruz as pretty good against righties but hit like a pitcher against lefties. Again, the Reds shouldn’t hide him or platoon him, because they need him to develop, but maybe Bell could go out of his way to rest De La Cruz against tough left-handed opponents.
Among the right-handed hitters, Steer and McLain both had substantial platoon splits in 2023 but hit righties well enough to start. Encarnacion-Strand and India both had reverse platoon splits in the majors in 2023, which would be convenient considering the Reds don’t have any strictly left-handed-hitting infielders. Zooming out to a multi-year sample, India’s reverse split persists — for his career, he has a 99 wRC+ against lefties but 110 against righties. But if Encarnacion-Strand gets to count his minor league numbers, like Marte did, his platoon split basically zeroes out.
So if De La Cruz sits when someone like Max Fried or Blake Snell comes to town, maybe Encarnacion-Strand gets into the lineup at DH or a corner, with everyone else sliding down the defensive spectrum and McLain ending up at shortstop.
The other situational consideration to monitor is offense versus defense. We know that De La Cruz is the team’s best defensive shortstop. We know that if De La Cruz is at short, McLain is the best defensive second baseman. To be honest, he might be the best second baseman anyway, because putting De La Cruz’s arm that close to first base might be legitimately dangerous.
Beyond that, it’s a bit of a crapshoot. Marte and Encarnacion-Strand are inexperienced at the major league level, and India is inexperienced at first base and in left field. Candelario has traditionally been an average defender at both corners. He’s had a couple above-average seasons in his youth, and is better at third than first, though that might change with age and experience.
The only relative judgment I feel comfortable making, apart from De La Cruz and McLain, is that Steer is a horrendous defender anywhere you put him. Here are his defensive numbers from his season-and-change in the majors:
| Position | Innings | OAA | RAA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1B | 572 | -6 | -4 |
| 2B | 160 | -1 | -1 |
| 3B | 458 | -7 | -6 |
| LF | 311 | -4 | -3 |
I don’t think you can actually learn that much by watching spring training games generally, but anyone who’s interested in the Reds’ long-term success should be glued to the TV whenever India is in the outfield. He’s graded out as a pretty poor defender at second base in his major league tenure, but if he shows any kind of aptitude in left field — enough to force Steer into more of a full-time DH role — that’d clarify Cincinnati’s logjam pretty quickly.
Balancing short- and long-term team goals while keeping all seven players happy is going to take some doing, but that’s why Bell gets paid the big bucks. Besides, there are at least a dozen other managers across the league who would love to have a chance to solve a problem like this. I’m sure he’ll figure it out.
Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.
As someone who follows the Reds very closely, this is a good piece that mostly gets things right. I do think there are two issues, though:
I have not seen anyone anywhere from within the Reds say that India is going to play 3rd. My understanding is that he doesn’t have the arm for it. They tried to fix him in the minors and he couldn’t make the adjustment to be an MLB 3B. If there is a day when neither of the first two options are available, I’d be shocked if the third option wasn’t EDLC with McLain sliding over to short for the day.
Additionally, I think any confidence about what kind of defender Steer is has little merit. He played four different positions last year, as a rookie. Two of which he hadn’t really played before. The sample size just isn’t there. And the scouting I saw from his time in the minors didn’t characterize him as a disastrous defender. It will be interesting to see if he improves with a regular position.
India is a mediocre player with a bad foot. Book him to begin the season on the injured list.
India has been good when healthy. He has struggled when he has tried to play through injuries
Reds signing Candalerio made zero sense at the time and still makes zero sense. Extreme small market team who overpaid a meh player at a position they didnt need help at
Was going to say the same thing. Depth is a good thing to have and the Reds had that in the IF before signing Candelario. Pitching on the other hand, not so much.
None of McLain, Elly, CES, or Marte have played much more than half a season at the big league level. Still unknowns. Guys will get hurt. They can rotate.
In the mid-1980s the Reds had two first-round pick shortstops hitting the bigs at the same time, and after the 1987 season they traded one of them – and good on them for choosing the right one to trade – to KC for a 26 year old, lefty starting pitcher. That deal worked out pretty well for the Reds.
Not often you get a Kurt Stillwell for Danny Jackson reference.
Bravo to you sir.
When I gamed it out, it seemed like one of the key questions is which of the players actually have the arm for right field or the range for center. The only outfielders I am trying to play are Friedl, Fraley and Benson. (No disrespect to Stuart Fairchild.) They all hit left. Friedl takes center every game (actually crushed lefties last year), and you want both Fraley and Benson in the game against righties. But how do you line up the outfield against lefties? Maybe then CES comes in at DH, Steer goes to left, and … who goes to right? Both Friedl and India have fringy arms. On some level the answer might be slide McLain to short, India at second, and Elly goes to right, but you probably don’t want to do that for developmental and organizational reasons. There was some talk of moving Marte to the outfield at some point, so maybe he (or CES, who got one game in right last year) goes to right, India goes to second, and McLain and Elly split the left side.
McLain would be the most likely to slide out to the outfield in a pinch. Played CF his freshman year at UCLA.
Signing Candelario makes no sense to me at all levels.
It’s blocking young players, created one hell of a logjam, and probably even angered some of these players as it simply makes no sense at all.
Reds couldn’t spend 45 million on a pitcher or maybe better outfielders?
Completely baffling from my point of view.
In some ways, if they do trade to lessen the logjam, they get forced into giving up one of the strong players due to the Candelario signing.
People obviously don’t want India, so now you might end up trading someone like a Steer or Marte and that could come back to burn later.
IMHO.
CES being able to play a competent RF would go a long way to solving this puzzle.
Someone tell Chris Taylor that no one gets paid $15m to be a platoon/role player (though yes, comparing the Reds and Dodgers payroll approach is unfair)
I don’t think the Candelario trade was that confusing honestly. I get that it creates some gridlock and positional interplay, but India isn’t a starting caliber player at any position, whether it be 1b/DH because of his bat or 2b because of his glove. The rumors surrounding him this offseason seem to confirm this lack of value. The everyday lineup is likely exactly what’s shown in the first table, with CES replacing India and India on the bench FT. Positions still have to be shuffled a bit day to day (India being the primary insurance for CES’ swing and miss not playing in the bigs) but it’s pretty easy to see the optimal lineup here imo.
Not all draft picks or FA signings are perfect fits.
Some are for talent level/skill rather than positional fit.
(It wasn’t that long ago SD had four SS in the IF.)
The reds wanted a power bat and Candelario was within their budget.
So they signed him and will figure out alignment elsewhere later.
If they end up with an embarrassment of riches, well that’s what trades are for.
Candelario isn’t a power hitter though. I’m sure playing in Cincinnati will help but he’s hit more than 20 HRs (22) in a season once.
And how many such hitters do they have today?
Nearly everyone in their lineup has higher a career ISO than Candelario.
But Candelario had the best last year, so how do 5 rookies have better ISO’s ?
To be clear I like Candelario, but it’s $45 million that I think the Reds good have spent better elsewhere.
Good article, I would only add that Fraley and Benson will also see time at DH.
I see lots of late inning pinch hitting, pinch running, and defensive replacements.
It’s funny to see everyone tie themselves in knots like they do on various Reds sites. It’s not that complicated. Up the middle is Stephenson (C), Elly (SS), McLain (2B), and Friedl (CF). Friedl led the team in WAR last year and is an above average defender. The corner spots and DH are split amongst the rest of the players.
Barring something strange, RF will always be Benson, Farley, or Fairchild because no one else has the arm except Elly and he and McLain are the best middle infielders on the team. So they don’t move. Steer gets most of the time in left. India is a utility guy (they’ve said as much). Candelario, Marte, and Strand share 1B/3B/DH.
That’s what’s going to happen, barring injury. It’s also the correct way to proceed.
If you are going to be critical of others you need to get your facts straight. I frequent Reds sites frequently. They are not tying themselves into knots nearly as much as you are here. The people on these sites don’t discuss a timeshare in RF of Fraley, Benson and Fairchild. They don’t discuss one of Fraley or Benson riding the pine every game. That is because those who followed the Reds last year understood that the two best hitters on the team vs. RHP were Fraley and Benson.
Therefore, your comment has the same major flaw with it that Baumann has when he created this post. You assume one of the IF will be playing LF most of the time. LF and RF belong to Fraley and Benson as I see it. Prior to breaking his toe Fraley had a RC+ of 122 last year. I am not going to penalize Fraley for coming back and trying to play through massive pain in September so I will ignore those stats.
Benson had a RC+ of 128(147 vs. RHP). You don’t bench your two best offensive performers vs. RHP from last year. If a RHP is starting Fraley and Benson should be also. The two players sitting on the bench should be some sort of rest/match-up configuration.
If a LHP is starting Fraley should be on the bench. Sitting next to him should be some kind of rotation between Benson, EDLC, CES and India.