David Bote Rises
Thirty-four days. That’s enough time, for some among us, to bike from the Atlantic to the Pacific and back — twice. It’s enough time to build a 57-story skyscraper, then build two-thirds of it again. It’s nearly enough time to write a first draft of The Sun Also Rises, apparently. (I’m cheating a little bit here: Hemingway started the book on July 21 and finished it in early September, but still… what the heck?) And it’s time enough to create the universe four times over, if you’re the Supreme Being whose exploits are documented in the Book of Genesis. Oh — and if you’re David Bote, a 25-year-old infielder for the Chicago Cubs — it’s enough time to author a breakout season.
You may recognize Bote from what he did Sunday night to the Washington Nationals, live and on national television:
That was, according to ESPN’s Mark Simon, the first two-out, walk-off, pinch-hit grand slam hit with a team down three in nearly 40 years, and it came on David Bote’s 34th game in the major leagues. But it wasn’t, as you might reasonably expect if you haven’t been paying close attention to the Cubs this year, the first indication that Bote is someone worth monitoring. The kid’s been raking ever since he was called up in April — and especially since he came up for good on June 27th.
| Rk | Player | PA | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mookie Betts | 461 | 192 |
| 2 | Mike Trout | 482 | 190 |
| 3 | J.D. Martinez | 491 | 182 |
| 4 | Jose Ramirez | 508 | 172 |
| 5 | Steve Pearce | 172 | 161 |
| 6 | Matt Carpenter | 491 | 158 |
| 7 | Aaron Judge | 447 | 157 |
| 8 | Max Muncy | 360 | 156 |
| 9 | Juan Soto | 306 | 154 |
| 10 | David Bote | 91 | 154 |
Setting aside the fact that there’s clearly another story to be told here about Steve Pearce, let’s pause and reflect for a moment on the reality that David Bote, a man who as recently as two years ago spent nearly his entire 23-year-old season at High-A, and as recently as last fall was listed outside of the top 22 prospects in a relatively weak Cubs’ system, has now hit, albeit for a brief period, as well as or better than some of the very best hitters in the game. It won’t last, of course — at least not in this way. But that isn’t really the point. When you roll a fair dice 10 times and it comes up sixes in all 10, you don’t scoff at the accomplishment because it was unlikely to happen that way, but rather marvel at it for exactly that reason.
David Bote is worth marveling at, right now. And there’s reason to think his recent success is done a disservice by being compared, by some idiot author, to a few lucky rolls of the dice. For one thing, there’s the simple fact that Bote’s average exit velocity — 95.9 mph — is quite literally the best in the game. If you had to design a strategy for success at baseball from scratch, hitting the ball harder than either Giancarlo Stanton or Aaron Judge would be a good way to start. Hitting it that hard in the air would be a good way to continue. My old boss Sahadev Sharma noted for The Athletic this April that Bote’s breakout at Double-A last year (and, by implication, his early-season success this year) was the result of an earnest effort to convert his sky-high exit velocities into doubles and home runs rather than ground outs and singles. Which is not a bad strategy if you can pull it off, which he appears to have done.
Bote is still hitting a fair number of balls on a line or into the ground — old habits die hard, I suppose, and that 55% ground-ball rate is still a little bit higher than you might like to see from someone with his profile — but by tweaking his timing to put his contact point a little bit farther out in front of the plate than he had previously, he’s been able to start hitting a fair number of pitches at angles between 16 and 20 degrees, as well, and those are the pitches where he’s making his name (chart via Baseball Savant):

There are reasons to think that Bote’s time in the limelight is going to end relatively soon. One of them is named Kris Bryant, who’s expected to return at some point this fall from a shoulder injury that’s kept him out for much of the summer. Another is named Javier Baez, and a third Addison Russell. The Cubs have a lot of infielders, and when all of them are healthy it’s going to be hard for Bote to get playing time, which is all the more reason for him to take a leaf out of Tommy La Stella’s book and learn how to pinch hit the way he did Sunday night (which, for what it’s worth, appears to be exactly what he’s trying to do). But whatever role he takes going forward, let’s not forget what David Bote has already achieved in his 34 days with the Chicago Cubs this year. This is not a man who suddenly became something different than he was. This is a man who became a better version of himself, quite quickly, and on the biggest stage possible. We should all be so lucky.
Rian Watt is a contributor to FanGraphs based in Seattle. His work has appeared at Vice, Baseball Prospectus, The Athletic, FiveThirtyEight, and some other places too. By day, he works with communities around the world to end homelessness.
I have no idea if this guy is gonna stick at all but he certainly makes Theo’s job in the off-season much more exciting. Moving Russell (3 years control) or Happ (5 years) or Almora (4 years) certainly seems more likely if they believe in Bote, his positional flexibility, and want to acquire another SP.
I hope Theo picks the wrong one to hold on to. Fingers crossed. _Sorry, hates the Cubs_
His defense has been great too
EV after 90 PA’s Bote’s well and starts to become somewhat predictive.
#TheBoteBatFlip
Imagine on June 1st, being told that the Cubs would add a #1 starter and a hitter with a 154 wRC. Probably, Hamels and Bote will both settle down, but today, it feels unbelievable.
And at the same time, Lester will suck, Darvish won’t pitch for the next two months, Bryant will be not good and then mostly out injured, Morrow will have an extended DL stint, Chatwood will manage to walk even more people than he has so far, and Montgomery won’t manage to stay nearly that good as a starter
Bryant wasn’t himself and lost power likely due to the injury, but saying “not good” with a 129 wRC+ and 2.2 WAR in 79 games is laughable. Monty has a 3.08 ERA and 3.84 FIP as a fifth starter. I’ll take that.
OPSed somthing like .740 after June first, which is what we were talking about. Think that was worth a 129 wRC+? Or were you pulling irrelevant stats?
And again, you’re ignoring what happened after June 1 with Montgomery. While he started extremely well, (and, admittedly, his first half of june was quite good), he dropped off a ton from there.
So please, next time: read, then post.
Not sure why this guy is getting so downvoted, everything he said about Lester, Darvish, Bryant, etc has all been more or less true since June 1st… guess people didn’t like the tone?
All of that, and the Cubs will still have the best record in the NL.
Still pretty unbelievable.
Hamels is in no way a #1 starter. Plenty of pitchers have nice 3-start streaks.
Yes but most of those don’t have Hall of Fame careers backing up the 3 starts
Former Cubs minor leaguer Josh Donaldson reincarnated into David Bote
Citing the Kiley/Eric rankings is meaningless- they almost never have insight, since the entire methodology is lowest-common-denominator and regressive. It’s just eye testing and industry surveys, with a massive preference for physical tools. They miss out on nearly all breakout candidates, as their methodology is supposed to be based on common opinion rather than any scientific measurements.
Bote has been a solid prospect for a while, he’s posted a 110 RC+ or greater at every stop since 2015, save only for 27 PAs during his first look at AA. His current .400 BABIP obviously won’t last, but the ’45’ grade on the hit tool is just guess work, as is the 45 grade on his glove (and his 40 FV).
They Kiley/Eric writeups are often a bit of a ‘mad libs’ adventure, with a grab-bag of near random scouting jargon put forward- often ironically off point. The writeup for Bote claims that he is basically positionless. In reality, he is an average or better than average MLB 3B. Clay Davenport, and all available minor league fielding data, suggests that Bote is roughly average with the glove. As per usual, the eye test ‘insight’ is not worth considering compared to the empiricism.
Just to re-cap some of the top prospects from Kiley/Eric ‘top 22 prospects for the Cubs’
* #1 Aramis Ademan. A hot name from the July 2 pool, Eric & Kiley say he is led by his 55 FV hit tool. He’s hit .223 this year, with a 21.5% K-rate and a .286 BABIP. His career average is around .250, his RC+ this year is 76 at A+, his RC+ last year was 78 at A-ball. KATOH has him as nothing special, but Kiley and Eric say that, by the eye test, everything he does “looks effortless and refined.” Such assessments mean nothing.
* #2 SP Adbert Alzolay. The 23 year old is said to have a FV 60 on both his fastball and curveball, with the eye test revealing confidence regarding the developing changeup. The data, however, is more skeptical- a 1.0 WAR KATOH projection. His career track record is mediocre, a 3.80 career FIP, with below average K rates. This year he’s posted a 4.70 FIP in AAA, with again poor K rates.
* #3 SP Jose Albertos. With only 46 pro innings, Kiley and Eric were rating Albertos largely off of his scouting industry/July 2nd hype. His FV grades for 3 pitches have been noted as ’60s and 70s’. But his performance heading into the year was only solid (FIP around 3.50), with some BB issues. This year he’s been a complete disaster, walking more than 10 batters per 9 at two levels of A ball. Again, KATOH rightly was skeptical but the eye test and the nonsense ‘tool grade’ approach created unsubstantiated hype.
* #4 Oscar De La Cruz. Again, KATOH was down on De La Cruz, projecting 0.6 WAR for future production. The eye testers, however, saw ‘electric stuff,’ despite a stead below average K-rate- and a mediocre FIP (4.20) during his only trip at high A or higher. De La Cruz has a 4.65 FIP this year in AA.
the rest of the list is the same, and indeed all their lists are just a summary of ‘most over-rated players in the industry,’ as their methodology is based merely survey and eye-test.
These traditional approaches always love the Ahmed Rosario, Victor Robles, tools-led prospects, and nearly always miss out on the major breakthrough players each year. Carson’s Fringe 5 blows the Kiley/Eric eye test/survey nonsense out of the water, as did KATOH when Chris was with fangraphs. While incorporating ‘prospect pedigree’ does raise predictive values of KATOH type systems (i.e. KATOH+ was more predictive than regular KATOH), this is only because it is impossible for the industry to miss on the majority of absolutely top-end prospects posting .430 wOBAs. The lowest common denominator survey stuff almost never provides insight, and almost never catches surprise breakouts.
Ben Zobrist is 37 with 1 more year under contract. Bote could conceivably take over his super-utility role at some point if he keeps hitting. Of course Ben is still really good so he might not be going anywhere.