David Wright, the Mets, and the Cost of Goodwill

Update: Less than an hour after this was published, the Mets announced that Wright would join the team for this weekend’s series in San Francisco “to continue his rehab under the watch of our training staff” and adding that he “will remain on the DL [disabled list].” Via the New York Post, “Sources said the Mets most likely would not activate Wright on the current road trip but would be more likely to do so Friday [September 7], when they return home.”

In the latest demonstration of their 80-grade ability to transform good news into bad, the Mets have turned David Wright’s promising rehab assignment into another illustration of the club’s parsimony and clumsy relationship both with players and fans. Even while promoting the 35-year-old third baseman and team captain from their High-A affiliate to their Triple-A one on Tuesday, the team — which has gone 48-73 since April 13, just half a game better than the NL-worst Padres — indicated that it’s unlikely to promote Wright to the major leagues this year, even for a September cameo, because of the insurance implications.

A seven-time All-Star, two-time Gold Glove winner and career .296/.376/.491 hitter, Wright hasn’t played in the majors since May 27, 2016 and has played just 75 big-league games since the start of 2015 due to chronic spinal stenosis (a narrowing of his spinal column) and problems with his right (throwing) shoulder. He has undergone three surgeries since his last MLB appearance, one to alleviate a herniated disc in his neck (June 2016), one to repair his right rotator cuff (September 2017), and one to alleviate pressure on a nerve in his back (October 2017). In August 2017, before the shoulder and back surgeries, he attempted a rehab stint, but it lasted just three games before he was shut down again.

In the wake of that operating table double whammy, Wright wasn’t cleared to resume baseball activity until June, and had to re-learn the mechanics of throwing. His pregame exercises to prepare his neck, back, and shoulder start at 1:30 pm for a night game, and he deals with pain on a daily basis. As The Athletic’s Marc Carig described it in his recent profile of Wright:

A good day means dull pain, the kind that can be worked around with the help of a consistent workout routine. A bad day means sharp pain, the kind that can be negotiated with, though only with a lot of time and effort. Then there are the most agonizing days, when his battered body refuses to cooperate. On one of these mornings, Wright awakened only to realize that he could not move.

[…]

Tests revealed that Wright had torn the lining of a disk in his back, which he later explained “isn’t a big deal, it’s just that you’re in excruciating pain for a few days.” It was another scare in a fruitless journey that has consumed more than two years of his life.

One couldn’t blame Wright if his numerous ailments forced him to retire, but thus far he has battled to play to the end of the eight-year, $138 million extension he signed in November 2012, a pact that runs through 2020. He’s making $20 million this year, with salaries of $15 million and $12 million for the final two seasons. Finally sent out on a rehab stint on August 11, Wright has played 12 games thus far, 10 with Port St. Lucie of the Florida State League and two with Las Vegas of the Pacific Coast League. His overall numbers haven’t been encouraging (.171/.209/.195 with 10 strikeouts in 43 plate appearances), but after an 0-for-14 start with six strikeouts in his first five games, he went 7-for-22 with just two strikeouts over his next six before taking an 0-for-5 on Wednesday. More importantly, he’s avoided setbacks, has moved well in the field, and has played six sets of back-to-back games, though he hasn’t reached benchmarks such as playing three straight games, and hadn’t played nine full innings on back-to-back days until reaching Vegas. Here’s Wright flashing some vintage form at the hot corner:

Even as Wright told the Las Vegas Review-Journal‘s Betsy Helfand he believed that a return to the majors in 2018 isn’t “out of the realm of possibility,” the Mets have signaled otherwise. In a conference call with reporters on Tuesday, assistant general manager John Ricco told reporters that the team promoted Wright to Las Vegas as part of a predetermined schedule, not on the basis of performance. Via the New York Post’s Mike Puma, Ricco said of the promotion, “It’s unrealistic to think he would be activated anytime soon, based on what we have seen to this point… [W]e tried to put in place a program that he could come back and show us he’s ready to be a major league player and so far he hasn’t reached that, whether it’s in terms of the playing time or playing skill. It’s kind of an all-of-the-above at this point.”

It seems obvious that getting Wright into a game Citi Field at some point in September, after rosters expand but before season’s end, would constitute a major highlight for the player and fans amid this otherwise lost season — whether as a reward for the arduous work he’s performed to get back into playing shape or as closure if Wright decides he has had enough.

“It’s a big goal of mine just because of the amount of work that you put in and the amount of time that you put in and the dedication to rehab that I’ve put in for two straight years,” Wright told Helfand. “You want to enjoy the rewards of all that work, and for me, that reward would be to go up to Citi Field.”

Yet multiple reports of Tuesday’s conference call left the impression that insurance considerations apparently trump any goodwill gesture. As it is, the team recoups 75% of Wright’s salary via insurance once he misses at least 60 games in a season — oh, and that money doesn’t get reinvested in payroll. Activating Wright for all of September would mean paying $3.21 million in salary. That figure could be reduced if the Mets were to return him to the DL after his current assignment expires (the insurance coverage would continue that much longer), but the opportunity for another rehab stint would dry up, since MLB rules require a minimum of five days between such stints, and all of the team’s affiliates will end their seasons by September 3.

Wright has been a credit to the Mets organization throughout his career. How will it look if the team doesn’t reward that, and his perseverance, after spending $2 million rostering Jose Reyes this year amid sub-replacement-level play (.197/.267/.328, -0.8 WAR) and the ongoing stain of a 2016 suspension for violating the league’s domestic violence policy? Combine that with the team’s refusal to promote prospect Peter Alonso, a first baseman who bopped 33 homers this year, because he’s not on the 40-man roster yet (while 11 pitchers with sub-zero WARs are) so as to give Jay Bruce (-0.2 WAR in the first year of his ill-advised, three-year, $37 million free agent deal) more reps at first base in September, and it’s impossible to avoid the conclusion that the Mets have decided the price tag on a few ounces of goodwill is simply too high.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

One could be forgiven for thinking that, for this franchise, the only constants are deGrom, dysfunction, and disappointment.

In the end, I do suspect that Wright’s quiet determination and dignity will win out, at least to the extent that he’ll make a major league cameo in September. Both he and the Wilpons know he could win a public relations war in a landslide if push comes to shove, particularly if this is to be his swan song. And if it isn’t, Wright deserves to head into the winter with a sense of accomplishment and hope that next year brings more opportunity to help the team. Wright may never return to being the player he once was, a star building a credible case for Cooperstown, but on a mismanaged team that is mired in mediocrity, and significantly short of reasons to cheer, the Mets have absolutely no reason to stand in his way if he’s ready to play.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

73 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kibber
7 years ago

someone needs to get a copy of the book Medical Medium by Anthony Williams into the hands of these pro sports health professionals – everything, and I mean everything, can be healed and cured. Everything.

jamesdakrnMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Kibber

Yes you can totally fucking cure HIV, you can totally fucking cure stage 4 cancer, you can totally fucking cure neurofibromatosis. GTFO with this bullshit

Cheeknbut
7 years ago
Reply to  jamesdakrn

.

CC AFCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Kibber

Didn’t expect to see the day junk science would be promoted in the comments here. 2018…*shrug emoji*

Johnston
7 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

“Didn’t expect to see the day junk science would be promoted in the comments here.“

Me neither, but as bad as that is it’s still better than Social Justice propaganda in articles that are supposed to be about baseball analytics.

Bigperm8645Member since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

“Social Justice propaganda” lol

Johnston
7 years ago
Reply to  Bigperm8645

“Social Justice propaganda” lol

It’s so easy to spot the Leftists around here.

david k
7 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

Clay Travis, is that you???

TKDCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Bigperm8645

“Why can’t we just stick to baseball?” bemoans asshole that brings up “social justice propaganda” out of nowhere. JFC.

slamcactusMember since 2024
7 years ago
Reply to  Kibber

I’m confused about something. Anthony WIlliam’s author bio says he was “born with the unique ability to converse with a high-level spirit who provides him with extraordinarily accurate health information that’s often far ahead of its time.” It goes on to say he has “unprecedented accuracy and success rate” and has helped “countless … people from all walks of life who couldn’t find a way to heal until he provided them with insights from Spirit.”

Supposing this is all true…how is the book supposed to help anyone cure their illness besides telling them to go see this man in person? If it’s a “unique” ability, then by definition only HE can talk to “Spirit.” Why waste the money on the book?

olethrosMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  slamcactus

I believe the “countless” part of that anyway. If something doesn’t exist, it can’t be counted.

dl80Member since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  olethros

Zero is still a number!

bunslow
7 years ago
Reply to  Kibber

I choose to believe that this was beautifully executed trolling

dukewinslowMember since 2020
7 years ago

the Mets (and maybe the Wilpons) are lucky MLB doesn’t raise money on public markets, because they’d have shareholder revolt on their hands for all the money they don’t make in New York. Frankly, if they’re not gonna relegate the Mets, they should start a third team to add value in the market.

this is said in jest, but even a rough counterfactual exercise in how much money the Mets “lose” MLB is embarrassing.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Shareholder revolt = stop buying tickets, going to games, buying merchandise, or watching them on TV. That will get their attention far more than random message board complaints.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

I find the Mets situation amusing. They are in this situation because of classical idiot muni fund money allocation decisions right out of a finance 101 textbook or case study. It’s a little crazy that it’s happening in New York, and not Peoria. Just enough money and knowledge to get interest from sharks and get taken, but not enough money and knowledge to get interest from or find successful managers. And it’s probably a good thing that this means they can’t afford to pay David Wright, not that they can’t afford minimum pension payouts to teachers.

LHPSU
7 years ago

Are you seriously arguing that it is a good thing for the Mets to play David Wright basically as a PR stunt, regardless of whether he is physically able or not, even if he is likely to be an utter embarrassment to himself, and essentially basing your argument off a couple of Twitter speculations and the Mets’ historical reputation?

timmer
7 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

It’s a good thing to reward a player who has meant a lot to your franchise when the cost is minimal and the stakes are non-existent. I don’t think Jay is arguing that he should be called up and pressed into daily service. But if you reinstate him and get him a few at bats in a lost season there’s very little downside to the club and it could mean everything to the player.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
7 years ago
Reply to  timmer

Jay isn’t arguing it, but it might be the next natural step in Wilpon logic. “As long as we’re paying him so much, why does he need days off? He can play through the pain like everyone else…”

Free Clay Zavada
7 years ago
Reply to  timmer

David is already “rewarded” with his pay, what else is he entitled to?

If he was crushing the ball in the minors, that would be one thing. But he’s floundering there obviously. I like how the 7 for 22 “hot streak” Jay mentioned is extremely arbitrary, yet probably doesn’t even lead to a league average batting line (it’s a .318 batting average, but he’s not walking or hitting for power based on his total batting line on his rehab).

ThomServo
7 years ago

Wright making a comeback from injury is the sort of zippy and magical, marketing-friendly content that fangraphs hypes up now. It feels good, and the new fangraphs cheerleads for the feel-good and entertaining aspect of the game a la ESPN/FOX, moving away from an emphasis on efficiency.

For the same reason and by the same logic-
SF should keep playing Sandoval regularly
The Angels should keep batting Pujols cleanup
KC should have held on to Moustakas
Seattle should move King Felix back into the rotation
The Reds should have brought back Brandon Philips

etc.

Jason BMember since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

Lolwut

LHPSU
7 years ago
Reply to  timmer

I guarantee you that if the Mets promoted him today rather than decline to promote him, we’ll all be talking about what an awful decision it is to promote him just for a PR stunt, taking playing time away from younger players and risking his long term health.

Johnston
7 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Tim Tebow is actually a better baseball player right now, and almost every one of you would scream if the Mets were discussing promoting him to The Show.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

I for one would love it if Tom Trebow made the Show

ThomServo
7 years ago
Reply to  timmer

This is pure nonsense.

Gifting PAs/roster spots to super-rich, unable-to-perform, name players, due to supposed sentimentality, is extremely regressive. Clubs like the Mets already struggle badly from this Kansas City type approach of paying for the past instead of the future.

It’s a feel-good idea fueled by media narrative. The downside is much higher than it looks from the outside- getting rid of ‘club legends’ can be difficult for clubs, and the impact on the front office can be complicated. Numerous front offices and coaching staffs around the league juggle issues with club legends wanting extensions or front office roles, etc. Cutting the chord is something competent clubs do routinely. Sentimental decisions open the door to more goofy, anti-competitive nonsense.

The only reason this is being suggested is because it has a certain ‘baseball ethos’ to it- i.e. traditional baseball purists like the idea of someone coming back from injury. Change the subject to whether Tebow ought to get promoted (for the monetary value/Q-score value with younger generations and casuals] and the author would probably be against it- as if it makes a mockery of the sport. Both are examples of laughably poor baseball decisions, Wright would simply have a folksy, traditionalist, marketing-friendly baseball ethos to it, Tebow would be a shameless plug for attention.

shaq_diesel
7 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

Tebow hasn’t been relevant in a decade. The younger generation has never even heard of him. It’s old, white, Middle America bible thumpers who are pushing for Tebow’s call up. I don’t know why the Mets have made that their target audience, but they have.

Dooduh
7 years ago
Reply to  timmer

You should be careful to state the argument correctly. The cost is not minimal by most standards. Activating Wright will cost the team about $2.5M. It’s prob not fair to say that isn’t a valid consideration for any team. But they may not have a choice.

None of us (including Jay Jaffe) knows the details of the insurance coverage. The Mets may not have much of a case to delay Wright’s activation and still receive the insurance payout for the month of September now that Wright has completed his minor league rehab stint (or will be soon to complete) without any setbacks. He’s shown that he’s able to play baseball games. Whether he is able to play to his former level is another matter and certainly not something recoupable from any insurance policy.

Again, barring a setback, I suspect we’ll see Wright in a Met uniform and activated some time on the next homestand.

maggie162Member since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Rostering players who are an utter embarrassment to themselves is kind of the Mets’ niche. At least this one is an inspiring figure on a personal level.

Dooduh
7 years ago
Reply to  maggie162

Suggesting that it’s an embarrassment to roster David Wright on any level is a strange plaint IMO. Forget that the guy has given more to this franchise than anyone on the current roster could ever imagine (non-deGrom division), but he’s under contract and completed his lengthy injury rehab and minor league stint. He actually deserves to be activated. But I don’t expect his own circumstances or history with the team to prevent most fans to whine when/if he goes 1-12 with 6Ks to start off.

Keep the expectations in check.

ThomServo
7 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

It’s the new fluff-narrative fangraphs.

The new market inefficiency is human interest stories.

Jason BMember since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

I’m sure you can get your baseball fix elsewhere, Ayn Rand…

Charles Bengal TigerMember since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

Why don’t you just leave if everything is such an affront to you?

Steve Bob Polkmas
7 years ago

The ownership of this team, with its unchecked greed and unmatched incompetence, is almost certainly the worst in American sports. Shame on the MLB for not forcing the Wilpons out after the revelations of the Madoff scandal.

CC AFCMember since 2016
7 years ago

Dan Snyder still exists

dukewinslowMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Jimmy Haslam could still end up in federal prison. The Wylffs barely dodged it!

catzdogz
7 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Haslem, sadly, was never even charged.

Steve Bob Polkmas
7 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

lol fair point

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

Why did everyone get the impression is because it was the insurance? It might be the insurance, but David Wright has been terrible in his cup of coffee in the minors and he’s still clearly fragile. You could easily say that you were keeping him around because he’s not quite healthy enough to go.

I think there are two related issues here that deserve scrutiny: First, the Mets get cheap at weird times. Second, the Mets have a bonkers history of handling injuries. So far, everyone has been focusing on the first one, but I wonder about the importance of the second one. I don’t know how it is relevant, but it seems like it’s worth thinking through.

Free Clay Zavada
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Agree with you. Not to be a grump, but I feel this is one of many recent FG articles that seem to be very pointed without solid facts to back them up. I like many of the new writers on the site but I have to say I prefer when the articles didn’t have some sort of an agenda (i.e., they were mostly impartial towards spending in free agency and towards political issues).

Johnston
7 years ago

“I like many of the new writers on the site but I have to say I prefer when the articles didn’t have some sort of an agenda (i.e., they were mostly impartial towards spending in free agency and towards political issues).”

So did I, but this is now a Hard Left political site with the occasional great baseball analytics article.

ThomServo
7 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

This site is not hard left at all. Strange thing to say. The site features Fox authors, is nearly all white-male, and is pretty mainstream and big money friendly.

The site has gone corporate, conformist and mainstream- where fake liberalism is always a bit popular- but the new direction definitely isn’t pro-labor, progressive, etc. Corporatism isn’t partisan.

DannyMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

I can honestly say that over the past year, I can’t figure out which of you two I like less. You’re different brands of troll-annoying; it’s the paradox of choice.

Can’t you grind your conspiracy-theory axes at home, without involving us everybody single day?

LHPSU
7 years ago
Reply to  Danny

Duels should be made legal again so that those two dunces can duke it out and mutually annihilate each other, making the world a better place for both left and right.

Johnston
7 years ago
Reply to  Danny

Danny: I’ll shut up when the Leftism goes away.

Mean Mr. Mustard
7 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

So far as I’ve been able to tell, you’re one of maybe two or three commenters that whinge about politics on a baseball news/analysis website. And none of this really occurred in the comments until a certain event happened.

It could be that the website is not the problem.

ThomServo
7 years ago
Reply to  Danny

Being critical of this site’s recent change of direction is not a conspiracy. Read Meg’s articles about having a magic and zippy take on baseball, crowding out the grumps, etc. Fangraphs and ESPN have a partnership content agreement- unsurprisingly, it effects content. Jeff Sullivan explained in his chat how often agents plant narratives and memes that get printed, and the new style of fangraphs sports reporting often features quotes from Boras, CAA, Olney, and the like.

Apart from that, some people take offense to any unpopular idea. So believing that David Ortiz took PEDs, or that certain MLB clubs are looking to relocate, can bring down alot of e-Hate on message boards.

Still, it’s a bit much how some comment section hall monitors hound out differing viewpoints. It’s conformist to attempt to label all differing opinion as trolling, it’s a comment section.

DannyMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

YOUR opinions (and Johnston’s) ARE trolling. They are repeated on virtually every article, with no new facts presented, to justify a large scale collusive hypothesis (or say, “conspiracy theory”) that other people have heard, respectfully debated, and moved on from. You now just type into the void, dying to be heard and disrupt other discussions. That is dictionary-defined trolling and I’m quite sure most of us have had it. I know I have.

Stop hiding behind your differing opinions. You two have them, we know you have them, and many of us agree in part with them. It is the constant hijacking of other conversations that we object to. Please go away until you have something new and constructive to contribute like 99% of Fangraphs readership.

Mean Mr. Mustard
7 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

I’m sure there are Hard Right political sites with occasional great baseball analytics if you look hard enough. Go look hard enough.

dl80Member since 2026
7 years ago

Is George Will still alive?

GoNYGoNYGoGo
7 years ago

Keeping DW out of the majors to collect the 75% of the $3.21 million means the Mets would collect $2.4 million in insurance. The cheapest ticket to Citifield sold by the Mets is $40. Assuming they all come by public transportation and don’t pay the $25 to park, and forgo all souvenirs, all $8 water bottles and $11.50 beers, and $6 hot dogs, it would take only 60K additional fans over the month who would otherwise not come to the game to break even.

CC AFCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  GoNYGoNYGoGo

Spirit of the comment being fair, the Mets currently have many tickets on sale on their website for less than $40

Careless
7 years ago
Reply to  GoNYGoNYGoGo

Given the ratio of tickets already sold to mets games to the number of people who are going to want to watch the near-bottom team play, I’d expect the secondary market for tickets to be going for well under face price for most seats. So increasing demand by a bit wouldn’t sell many more tickets.

But they will still buy some concessions, so there could be some value

Metropolitans
7 years ago

The team never said he wasn’t getting called up in September. They said not anytime soon. That’s very subjective. Only the media interpreted that as saying not this season.

Someone close to Wright leaked to a beat writer that he’s driving the bus in this recovery. If he wants to be back, he’s going to be back.
The Carig Athletic article was great (and depressing) and Wright’s comments there indicate he’s not thinking about 2019. When he gets back to Citifield in September, for one last hurrah, I think that could be it for him. Then the team could save the remaining $27 million salary and afford the $3 million in September.

One last thing that shows Wright is coming back: Jose Reyes is still inexplicably on this roster. Barring any setbacks, Wright is coming up.

oozyalbies1
7 years ago

It’s plain and simple: he’s not ready. He hasn’t shown to be effective or healthy in a relatively lengthy rehab stint, and that hardly has anything to do with the organization, regardless of how much fun it is to speculate over what their motivations might be (JUICY, HOT TAKE: THE METS ARE CHEAP AND THEY HATE YOU!)

More interesting was their curious handling of the Yoenis Cespedes situation this season. It seemed as though he wasn’t much interested in playing and the team was all too happy to let him sit out. My thought was that this might be insurance related, as the team offered essentially no status updates or anything resembling a concrete plan / timetable for his return. Why not recoup the (assumed) insurance?

It all made too much sense. Until they brought him back after it was too late to make a difference. Without knowing the extent of his prognosis. And immediately DL’ed him and prescribed season-ending surgery. Were they trolling us the whole time? To make it seem like it wasn’t an insurance ploy, when really it was?

Lesson: Don’t try to make sense of the Mets. The answer is either blatantly obvious, or completely senseless.

jwa05001
7 years ago

Honestly, are they really doing Wright a favor if he gets called up then goes 0-30 with 15 ks. Or even worse, what if he gets hit in the back or reinjures himself running bases?

You’ve now embarrassed the guy or cost him another year of rehab for a publicity stunt. I’m glad they’re treating Wright with more dignity than a carnival side show.

scooter262
7 years ago

Question: if Wright decides he’s had enough, and it isn’t worth the crazy amount of pain for him to continue, and he decides to retire, does he forfeit the remaining money on his contract? Or, because he’d be retiring due to injury, would he still be entitled to his remaining salary for the duration of his contract? I remember a similar discussion a few years ago concerning Prince Fielder, but I don’t remember what happened with the money when/if Fielder actually retired.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  scooter262

Generally speaking, retiring means forfeiting your contract. Prince Fielder did not formally retire right away, because would YOU walk away from that much money if you didn’t have to? The Rangers couldn’t just release him, because that would forfeit their insurance policy on his contract. Ultimately TEX came to a settlement with their insurers and were able to let Prince go. He’s still getting paid tho.

I believe that it was Gil Meche, who was the player of some note who just walked away from the last year of his deal rather than limp around in the minors forever attempting a rehab.

halidonhill
7 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Most teams work out a settlement of some sort.

tb.25
7 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Prince’s situation is that he will be paid so long as it is a career-ending injury, and that attempts to get healthy still result in a recommendation to not play baseball. If he stops pursuing health or is shown to be able to play, he forfeits the money and is removed from the 60-day DL he is/was on in MLB (I think he can be on some version of it even without being on a team).

ThomServo
7 years ago

There are tons of reasons not to promote an injury-plagued veteran purely for sentimental reasons. Just because the Mets are run poorly does not somehow justify poor moves that are also sentimental. Righting the ship is often about reigning in non-stop incompetence= moving away from Wright/Tebow type nonsense (and related unserious decision making) would be good for the Mets.

Johnston
7 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

“There are tons of reasons not to promote an injury-plagued veteran purely for sentimental reasons. Just because the Mets are run poorly does not somehow justify poor moves that are also sentimental. Righting the ship is often about reigning in non-stop incompetence= moving away from Wright/Tebow type nonsense (and related unserious decision making) would be good for the Mets.”

Everyone wrongly thinks I hate ThomServo. In fact I agree with him here 100%.

rosen380
7 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

I think it is perfectly reasonable to sometimes agree with someone you hate [or disagree with someone you like for that matter]

Careless
7 years ago

btw, this would be “good will” and not “goodwill”, which has a specific definition this could not meet.

williamnyy
7 years ago

I am not sure the Mets’ have the discretion to determine whether David Wright’s health is or isn’t good enough to take the field, at least with regard to their insurance claim. If the insurer believes the Mets are milking the policy by refusing to activate a capable player, they could very well decide to stop paying. It’s hard to know for sure without being privy to the policy, but this may not simply be a case of the Mets trying to save some money.

Regardless of the above, the much bigger story about a New York team being penny wise and pound foolish was the admission (though we all knew) that the only reason the Yankees did not get Verlander last year was because Hal had no interest in taking on the money. Similarly, the only reason the Yankees waited a month to cover the loss of Judge was for the same reason. Instead of cheering on the Yankees attempt to get below the luxury tax threshold, fans/media should be questioning why a team whose revenue is so high (especially relative to other teams) needs to be cutting payroll so drastically. Instead, that gets ignored, and the Mets get pounded for purely symbolic decisions.

ThomServo
7 years ago
Reply to  williamnyy

Surely the main reason the Yankees didn’t take on Verlander was that they didn’t know he was going to recover his awesome form- which may have been aided by Houston’s staff.

Agreed that we don’t know insurance and medical particulars- but the Mets should look to save assets. Salary, PAs, innings played, big league reps, roster spots, etc., should go to players who could become long-term assets. The lack of long term assets, particularly position players, has plagued the club for a very long time.

This whole idea of ‘testimonial plate appearances’ for David Wright is almost bizarre.

PC1970Member since 2024
7 years ago

The sad thing is this could easily be turned into a win-win situation if the Mets just showed a little creativity. If this is it for him, How about a “David Wright weekend” near the end of the year? Maybe he plays Friday & Sunday & they have a ceremony for him? or if he can’t play the field, maybe they pinch hit him? No one says they have to bring him up & start him 15 times, just give him 5-10 AB’s. If you don’t think he can run the bases, use a pinch runner. You have all the September call ups to use.

They’re out of contention & quite frankly, could he be much worse than the wife-beater, Reyes? Give yourselves a little PR boost & I wouldn’t be shocked if they saw an increase in attendance (& the resulting revenues) by doing something like the above. Give the fans a chance to honor a former beloved player, who has grinded back from a serious, career killing injury. What’s the harm in that?

Slappytheclown
7 years ago

While Ownership is terrible, and Management is awful (and these probably have a lot of overlap), in this situation there are several good reasons beyond saving money to wish Wright would just retire. Number 1, if he plays doesn’t he have to be added to the 40 man roster? Maybe there is some DL maneuvering the Mets could do here but…who wants a 35yr old 3b in constant pain taking up a 40 man roster spot? And long term he’s not going to be on the 25 man next year, I don’t care what anyone says. No team can really afford a player who can’t contribute regularly on their 25 man roster anymore. So why are we giving ABs to this guy? I guess if he’s just back for a last hurrah to prove he can play again then maybe work out a way to get him a few ABs but that’s it, then it’s over and time to move on for both parties really.

breskinatorMember since 2026
7 years ago

As a lifelong Mets fan, I wish that our owners could find it in their hearts to bring Wright back. Just the image of him walking out onto Citi Field in a jersey and curtain calling the crowd warrants his return to the roster in my very biased opinion. Our owners have done a rather embarrassing job constructing and maintaining this team and have run the organization in general in a rather disgraceful manner. Our fanbase frequently complains about how cheap our owners are (well deserved btw), and this could be a way to offer a peacekeeping offer and distract us from disaster that is the upper levels of management.

John Autin
7 years ago

I disagree that Wright’s rehab is “promising,” but that’s not the point.

The point is that he pursued this comeback for himself, with no realistic goal EXCEPT a token activation. The team has stood to gain nothing from his future play from the moment he was diagnosed with spinal stenosis, and they would have gotten a lot more insurance if he had retired then.

Yes, he had every right to try and get back, and I can’t fault him much for doing it; it’s in the nature of the athlete’s personality. But the Mets fans I know personally think he has nothing left to contribute on the field. And since his quixotic quest has already cost the team substantial insurance money, I don’t think he’s owed any goodwill.

And by the way, decisions about Wright have nothing at all to do with any other dumb roster moves, like hiring and playing Jose Reyes. That’s a complete distraction. Giving him a valedictory lineup appearance won’t affect how Mets fans feel about having kept Reyes this year. The Reyes experience is a sunk cost.

Have a big day for Wright, absolutely. Celebrate his career. Sing his praises. But don’t activate him. He has no future as a player.

My stance is not about protecting the Wilpons’ money. I hate them. But if they’re going to spend $9 million — the additional cost in insurance lost by activating him now, per ex-GM Steve Phillips in a recent radio interview — I want it spent on a real ballplayer.

John Autin
7 years ago

I guess some Mets fans would find it a “highlight” of a lost season to see Wright back in the lineup, if only for a game or two. To this Mets fan, though, it would just be a painful reminder that, in the last 3 years, he’s been paid $60 million and been worth nothing to us. It would be a painful reminder of just how bad his defense was as his body broke down; those horrible sidearm floating throws still haunt my memories.

It’s fair to call the Wilpons cheap with the payroll. But Wright’s refusal to retire directly blocked the team from hiring some other useful player. I just don’t have the warm-fuzzies for him any more.

Please, can we just MOVE ON from this already?

John Autin
7 years ago

Just want to add that I am DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED in the cavalier, piling-on-just-for-fun anti-Mets tone of several recent FG articles. I’m sure this is not a concerted effort by writers, but some editor needs to wake up and do his or her job. This particular editorial column doesn’t remotely meet the standards of intellectual objectivity that readers have a right to expect here — especially paying members.

Deeming Wright’s rehab as “promising” and “good news” is both pure conjecture and utterly personal opinion, so to lead with a snarky dig at the club’s “80-grade ability to transform good news into bad” is indefensible. DO A BETTER JOB.

John Autin
7 years ago

Bunch of intellectual cowards writing on this website now. Adios.