Detroit Pulls a Shortstop Out of Its Hat

There’s something satisfying about the perfect trip to the grocery store. If you’re anything like me, you know what I’m talking about: you have a list of a ton of things you can’t wait to eat, you cross each of them off as you throw them in your cart, and by the time you reach the cash register, you can almost taste the delicious meals you’ll be eating the rest of the week.

Why bring this up now? Because that’s how I imagine Al Avila feels after signing Javier Báez, with the Tigers inking the ex-Cubs shortstop to a six-year, $140 million deal last night, as Jon Morosi first reported. Front-line starter. Shortstop. Catcher. The Tigers came into this offseason looking to place star veterans around their burgeoning youth movement, and with Báez in tow, they’ve now landed a top hitter to go with a top pitcher, just like they planned.

Báez played second base after his trade to New York last season, but he’s a natural fit at shortstop. He’s a plus defender with a knack for making spectacular plays, but even without those flourishes, he’d be an asset in the field, with a huge arm and solid range and instincts. Of the marquee shortstops in this class, Báez and Carlos Correa are first and second, and no one else is in the same stratosphere.

That’s a key qualification, because the Tigers were in the lower half of the league when it comes to infield defense last year, and they’re breaking in a stableful of young pitchers. Be honest: you can already picture the reactions in your head. Báez makes some stumbling pirouette to spin a grounder from straw into a double play, and Casey Mize claps giddily and disbelievingly from the mound. Tarik Skubal jabs his arms into the air triumphantly after Báez makes a circus catch over his shoulder in shallow left. The possibilities are endless, and the highlight reels will be amazing.

If I were a Tigers fan, that alone would be worth the price of admission. Baseball lasts more than six months every year. You’re going to watch the eight regulars on your chosen team so often. Having one of them turn routine plays into little moments of grace every few days is a gift that keeps on giving.

At the plate… well, look, they can’t all be winners. Despite prodigious power, Báez has been a feast-or-famine player at the plate his entire career, and the strikeouts and fallow stretches add up. He’s a career 103 wRC+ player despite hot streaks that rival anyone in the game; strike out 30% of the time while walking at a 5% clip, and offense won’t ever come easy.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Projection systems are down on Báez’s long-term offensive value, though to different extents. Steamer projects him for a .242/.289/.444 line next year, which is good for a 95 wRC+. ZiPS has a higher opinion of Báez by a fair margin, but still thinks he’ll be OBP-challenged. It also thinks he’ll age fairly well, which makes the deal look better for Detroit than you might first expect:

ZiPS Projection – Javier Báez
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SB OPS+ DR WAR
2022 .261 .304 .468 536 79 140 27 3 26 80 26 17 107 2 3.1
2023 .264 .307 .489 503 75 133 27 4 26 79 25 15 113 1 3.3
2024 .263 .306 .484 486 72 128 26 3 25 75 24 14 112 1 2.9
2025 .263 .307 .475 467 68 123 24 3 23 71 24 12 110 0 2.6
2026 .261 .304 .463 445 63 116 21 3 21 65 23 10 106 -2 2.1

Let’s be honest with each other: $140 million is a lot of money for a hitter who might end up with a two-handle OBP next year. The shortstop market has been downright scalding so far this offseason, with each of the three top guys to sign so far exceeding their crowdsourced projections in both AAV and years, and they’ve all ended up with at least $50 million more in guaranteed money than the projections. That appears to be the cost of doing business this year; between the Rangers and Tigers, non-contending teams looking to jump start their rebuilds have created a huge amount of demand for a fixed number of talented shortstops. In that context, Báez’s deal looks rich: ZiPS would have given him five years and $107 million, and it’s the high man on his future value.

Is Báez a good use of resources even given that strong demand? I think so, because Detroit is perfectly situated to add an excellent shortstop, whatever the cost. You can’t make a baseball team out of surplus value, and the Tigers are already awash in it. Young players get paid a steep discount to the value they produce on the field, and the Tigers have a wave of talented youngsters reaching the majors. Almost no matter what Avila and the front office do, they won’t be hurting for talent per dollar spent.

Instead, the bottleneck is raw production. As constituted at the end of last year, the Tigers didn’t have the horses to compete for a playoff spot. By adding Eduardo Rodriguez, Tucker Barnhart, and Báez, they’ve upgraded spots that were virtual blanks before into above-average players, which was of utmost importance to them coming into this offseason. If they spent $10 million or $20 million too much on Báez, fine! Trevor Story and Correa, the two remaining top-flight shortstops, might sign rich deals as well, and ending the offseason with no upgrade at the deepest offensive position would be a disaster.

I don’t think the Tigers are a playoff team even with these upgrades, but they’ve given themselves more favorable odds. Without upgrading, it almost wouldn’t matter if a few of their young pitchers took a step forward this season or Spencer Torkelson went 2001 Albert Pujols on the league; the offense and pitching depth just wouldn’t be there. Adding wins puts the team in a better position to take advantage of any positive surprises, and given the composition of the AL Central, playoff contention might be closer than it appears.

The Tigers shouldn’t be done with their offseason. They still need pitching depth, particularly if they non-tender Matthew Boyd. I think they could use a fourth outfielder, more as an insurance policy than anything else. They can be more bargain-focused on those fronts, though, because there are plenty of fourth outfielders and fifth starters, but only a few 3-plus WAR shortstops. But I like this deal for them, even if Báez’s contract is higher than I expected, because they correctly identified that talent, not money, was the scarce resource for them this offseason. The highlight-reel defense certainly doesn’t hurt, either.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

54 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
AshnodsCouponMember since 2018
4 years ago

Ugh how is it that everyone but my White Sox is spending money to get good players this week???

We’re a big market team! We tanked for four years for this? 🙁

miltonfriedman
4 years ago
Reply to  AshnodsCoupon

You are highly overrated. I’m guessing 80 wins in 2022

szakylMember since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  AshnodsCoupon

Look within your division 2 states east.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  AshnodsCoupon

They don’t exactly have a lot of holes, and on top of that, these deals are ludicrous. Maybe they’ll make a play for Chris Taylor, or Michael Conforto, but Kendall Graveman is a perfectly fine signing.

MikeSMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It was, but the difference between getting bounced from the ALDS in 4 vs winning the World Series is more than Kendall Graverman. They played poorly in general against the Astros and could just be counting on the starting pitching not sucking in the post season, but a real MLB second baseman would be very nice. I think they can cobble together RF adequately, but playing a utility infielder at second all year long would be dicey.

One more starting pitcher would be nice too, but a rotation of Giolito, Lynn, Cease, Kopech, and Keukel is still probably better than most contending teams are going to field.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

The way to get to the World Series is to make it to the playoffs and play better than everyone else. The White Sox were more talented on paper than my Acuna-less Braves

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

I’m actually of the mind that Conforto fits better here than anywhere else. He’s not a great defensive guy but he’s pretty consistent offensively, which should stabilize a lineup filled with explosive talents that rely on BABIP.

Not sure there are any second basemen left on the free agent market unless you want to spend big on Story and shift him (or Anderson) to second. That seems like it would improve the team less and cost more.

Bud SmithMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Conforto is many things, but I don’t really think “consistent” is one of them. Only once in his career has he posted consecutive seasons with an OPS+ within 20 points of each other.

Luke I am your Father
4 years ago
Reply to  AshnodsCoupon

Steve Cohen let one slip past the goalie

MRDXolMember since 2021
4 years ago
Reply to  AshnodsCoupon

tbf a lot of the guys they should be gunning for (C. Taylor, Suzuki, Conforto, Castellanos) are still on the board for the moment. semein is the only real miss so far given their needs, and it seems like Texas just stepped up and blew everyone away on years in particular.

fjtorres
4 years ago
Reply to  AshnodsCoupon

ChiSox extended Garcia.
So they did *something*. 😀

marcotomas
4 years ago
Reply to  AshnodsCoupon

Because the White Sox are looking for finishing touches, not plugging massive holes. The RF and 2B they get don’t have to be studs, as they’ll likely be lower in the batting order anyway after Robert, Anderson, Jimenez, Grandal, Abreu, etc. The Sox don’t need an ace, with a rotation that most teams would kill for (though depth or someone to supplant Keuchel doesn’t hurt). And the bullpen is stacked.

In other words, to get improve, this team doesn’t need more players or more talent, it needs depth and polish. It needs to develop that consistent, professional approach that, for example, the Astros showcased in the playoffs. So no, they were never going to pay this much for Baez, or Scherzer, or Seager.

rhdx
4 years ago
Reply to  AshnodsCoupon

I agree they really needed a starter, but other than that would not have wanted them to commit so much money to other players that filled needs. Hopefully they can still make a few signings – there are valuable players still on the board.

chisoxmatt
4 years ago
Reply to  AshnodsCoupon

Brother Im in Oak Lawn and have been a White Sox fan my whole life. We do not want Baez, he is k machine and is way over rated. I would take Shwarber though. Then I would try to trade to get Madrigal back or trade for Cavan Biggio.

MoateMember since 2022
4 years ago
Reply to  chisoxmatt

“Then I would try to trade to get Madrigal back”.

How? Why would the Cubs do that? Of course they have needs that the Sox could probably address, but I just don’t see why you don’t just move on and try to find someone to help win now.

ahantsche
4 years ago
Reply to  chisoxmatt

Madrigal and Biggio are wildly different players… I think the Sox would benefit more from Madrigal-type, but they can find a reliable average hitter for cheaper than Madrigal from a journeyman veteran. Garcia was a good re-sign.

NCPhilly
4 years ago
Reply to  AshnodsCoupon

My Phillies too, but I expect that should change

Dmjn53
4 years ago

Those ZIPs projections are surprisingly rosy. I’m surprised they don’t predict any OBP decline from now until his age 33 season.

Although I guess when your OBP is already that low, there’s not much room for it to get lower

asb123Member since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

There is always more room going downward… See Davis, Chris

ahantsche
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

Could see the OBP drop off a bit, but also could see those HR numbers being a bit low.

miltonfriedman
4 years ago

Baddoo
Schoop
Grossman
Torkelson
Candelario
Baez
Cabrera
Barnhart
Greene
Bench-Rogers,Hill,Haase,Parades,Castro(4 of the 5)

A couple bullpen arms from 90 wins

hombremomento
4 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Not to mention Hinch making the team better with much similar roster to year before. Tigers gonna contend even sooner than I thought

Domingo AyalaMember since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

My lineup projection, just for the sake of comparison:
Lineup

LF – Robbie Grossman
RF – Riley Greene
1B – Spencer Torkelson
SS – Javier Baez
3B – Jeimer Candelario
DH – Miguel Cabrera
2B – Jonathan Schoop
C – Tucker Barnhart
CF – Akil Baddoo

Bench

OF – Victor Reyes
IF/OF – Willi Castro
IF – Isaac Paredes
C- Eric Haase (later Rogers/Dingler)

Rotation

Eduardo Rodríguez
Tarik Skubal
Casey Mize
Matt Manning
Tyler Alexander

VinnieDaGooch
4 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

They need another starter and that lineup is really dependent on how Greene and Torkelson perform in year 1. They could use another dependable bat in that lineup, but it is hard to see where to squeeze one in with Miggy clogging up DH. Maybe a COF on a one year deal?

Domingo AyalaMember since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  VinnieDaGooch

They absolutely need another starter. Maybe two, so Manning can go back to AAA. It wouldn’t be bad to see Baddoo pushed to a fourth OF role if a good CF were available.

carterMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Domingo Ayala

Ehh guys who come from A ball and stick in the majors, then get sent down and come back and massively cut K’s shouldn’t be a 4th of. Akil is going to be an above average player in the MLB for a long time.

Cool Cool CoolMember since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  carter

Not sure what you’re referring to with Akil’s Ks. He posted a higher K% after he came back from his demotion

VinnieDaGooch
4 years ago
Reply to  Cool Cool Cool

He has the timeline all mixed up. Akil never got demoted. He had a brief rehab stint in AAA. He was a rule 5 he couldnt get demoted. Akil had already drastically changed his k% prior to going on that rehab stint

MRDXolMember since 2021
4 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

that is (presently) an aggressively mediocre lineup, and it’s only a little better defensively. do not count on Tork or Greene to instantly be the offensive forces they’ll eventually become. meanwhile, of Detroit’s current pitching staff, only ERod cleared 2 WAR, and the next closest was the reliever version of Michael Fulmer. the white sox team you think is so overrated had 5 pitchers clear that, including four starters far clear of ERod, of which one is a free agent. not a single Detroit hitter, even with Baez in the fold, hit for a 120 wRC+ or better, while 7 white sox hitters (min 100 PA) did so. why on earth do you think these rosters are remotely comparable right now lol

Domingo AyalaMember since 2024
4 years ago

I love your take! Nice article

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

I would never suggest that a team should give a $140M contract to the human personification of chaos that is Javier Baez. I’d much rather go after Trevor Story, even at the same salary. But if there is any team this offseason that should have made a play for a younger shortstop (and Baez definitely counts) it’s the Tigers.

So I don’t like the deal in the abstract, but it works for the Tigers. In theory, they could still add Story too, and that would be reasonable, since Baez’s contract is only “very large” and not “impossibly massive.”

Speaking of “impossibly massive”: In a normal offseason, I would have thought they should have gone after Correa, but after Seager’s monster deal I can’t see it. Correa’s going to run in the $350M-$400M range and that’s basically a non-starter for 25 teams.

TKDCMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Is he? I mean, you only need to find one sucker, but one of the suckers is off the table now. Believing that Correa is a better investment than Seager doesn’t require any team to hand him a fortune simply because the Rangers handed Seager a fortune.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

“This contract is bad and this team probably shouldn’t do this.”
-Sadtrombone in every thread this week-

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

Generally speaking, most free agent contracts deserve that assessment. And this year, it’s even more extreme than usual. These numbers are crazy.

I liked the E-Rod and Marte deals though.

MoateMember since 2022
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Counterpoint: Most contracts are lower in value than the revenue created by the players and the league had just been artificially suppressing wages (especially over the last 2 years since they had the pandemic fig leaf) and they’re now doing some spending to show the players they don’t need all those pesky things they’ll ask for in the next CBA.

This whole thing screams “market correction” to me.

tung_twista
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think if there is one player in MLB where WAR cannot capture his value to fans and the team, well, it is clearly Ohtani at number one.
But the number two spot arguably belongs to Baez.
Yes, he does aggressive baserunning that sometimes leads to stupid outs, but when it works, it is beautiful to behold.
Ultimately, this is an entertainment industry and nobody with “only” 18 war in his career was as entertaining as Baez has been.

MoateMember since 2022
4 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Point of order: Ohtani was #1 in WAR. How can you claim the top guy is underrated?

(Please note, prior to this past year, he was injured constantly, and fans do NOT value high profile guys nursing their way back in any tangible way, they tend to hate it)

PlatypiMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  Moate

He didnt say underrated…

dodgerbleu
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

What makes you think Story was available at the same money? Huge assumption to base an opionion on. And it’s wrong.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago

But that trick never works

Kevbot034
4 years ago

I am very surprised ZiPS essentially sees no age curve offensively. Those few extra HR and SB projected in 22 over 26 would make this a great signing. I fear for Baez aging because that K rate and BB rate, but I guess if he’s already bottomed out, what’s the harm…?

The Stranger
4 years ago
Reply to  Kevbot034

I’ve been thinking this. I’m not at all optimistic about a guy who makes up for a meh approach with inhuman reflexes aging well.

TKDCMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  The Stranger

His approach is worse than meh. Baez with a meh approach would be a superstar.

proiste
4 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Baez may have the worst approach of any regular starter in the major leagues. That’s definitely a dig, but it makes his relative success even more remarkable!

Jolly Good Show
4 years ago

My concern with Baez is if his bat speed starts to drop. For years, he has compensated for his low walk, high K with great bat speed. Without that bat speed, offensively he could become toast very quickly, without adapting accordingly.

As a result of this, Baez was the one free agent this year whom I would have been reluctant to give a deal this long to.

Glevin
4 years ago

As others have said, I think Baez has enormous downside. His game is built around amazing defense and power. Very easy to see him losing a step on d and with his swing slowing down just a bit and then he becomes what? I’d take a bet on him for 2-3 years but long term, think he’s going to age very poorly.

NickMember since 2020
4 years ago

Hey, we just saw Starling Marte and Yuli Gurriel learn to draw the occasional walk in their 30’s. There’s got to be a chance , right? Right!? Lord have mercy, that swinging strike rate.

Brock244
4 years ago

Good for the Tigers for spending, but the opt outs they gave both Erod and Baez, really dull the upside and excitement IMO.

I think the attraction to signing both Erod and Baez is that they are fairly young have untapped potential. So in theory their deals could both turn team friendly , however the opt outs cancel out that possibility (and they won’t be able to QO Erod).

Opt outs, to me, are more benefital to win-now/slam dunk contenders in that they can get a player for a slightly lower price. But to a team on the rise, they really stink. They should have offered each more $$ to rip out the opt outs.

VinnieDaGooch
4 years ago
Reply to  Brock244

I dont see untapped potential as the attraction to Baez at all.

MoateMember since 2022
4 years ago
Reply to  VinnieDaGooch

If people can believe that “Ichiro could hit 40 homers but prefers to hit for average” why can’t people believe “Javy could hit .300 but he prefers to do Javy things”?

It’s the untapped potential of magical thinking.

OddBall Herrera
4 years ago

Baez is one of those guys who will go from great to terrible with little warning, so with that risk I liked him better as a third or so best hitter on a contender than as someone who needs to carry your offense, as he will be called upon to do in Detroit

Neils-Henning Orsted Joc PedersonMember since 2025
4 years ago

The author notes:
“Of the marquee shortstops in this class, Báez and Carlos Correa are (defensively) first and second, and no one else is in the same stratosphere.”

Where does this idea come from? According to the defensive values right here at Fangraphs, over the last four seasons the glovework contributions of Marcus Semien and Trevor Story fairly dwarf those of both Baez & Correa.

Semien 536 games, +44 runs
Story 503 and +36
Baez 495 and +26
Correa 391 and +15

I get that some fans really, really love Baez because he’s fun. Fun is good. But don’t try and sell us an untruth, please.

dl80Member since 2026
4 years ago

None of the defensive metrics indicate Baez is much above average at short, outside of a crazy good 2019.

He’s almost exactly average by UZR and OAA, and a bit above by DRS (again, outside of 2019).

This year, of guys with 400+ innings at short, he was 20th in UZR/150, 16th in DRS, and 20th in OAA.

NewfyMember since 2024
4 years ago

As a fan of the Tigers, I have dreams of the ghost of Mr. Ilitch coming to visit his son in the night, attempting to convince him to sign Story too. Then he’d spend time discussing something like moving Schoop to 1st, and flipping Torkelson for someone like Arozarena, and signing Todd Jones.