Diamondbacks Among Teams Prepped For Big Drafts

With the Rays’ signing of Felipe Lopez to a minor league deal, all the supplemental draft picks have been decided and the final draft order for the 2011 Rule 4 draft has been set. Especially given how tremendously strong the 2011 draft is supposed to be – Keith Law says that there could be as many as 20 top-100 caliber prospects in this class and that it looks, at least right now, like the best class since he joined the baseball industry. Using the draft order from our own Mike Axisa at River Avenue Blues, here are the teams that can really invigorate their systems with either high quality picks, a large quantity of picks, or both.

Arizona Diamondbacks
Top 90 picks: #3 #7 #43 #63

One can definitely question if the Arizona Diamondbacks even gave a single thought to signing last year’s sixth overall pick, Barret Loux. Regardless of the morality in their decision to eschew signing Loux for the guarantee of the compensatory pick they received in thie year’s draft – the seventh overall pick – it almost certainly will pay dividends. The Diamondbacks will already bring in a top-tier talent at the third spot, and the talent they get with the seventh pick this season will almost certainly outclass Loux. On top of that, they’ll bring in a supplemental draft pick with Adam LaRoche’s departure, and their second round pick is early enough that it could provide some value. Victor Wang’s draft research only gave dollar values for mid-first round choices, placing them at around $5 million in surplus values. But using Sky Andrecheck’s research, we can see that the third overall pick is worth roughly three times the amount of a typical first round compensatory pick (for more, see here) and the seventh pick is worth roughly twice that. With the value from those picks set at about $5 million by Wang, the Diamondbacks first two picks alone could be worth of upwards of $25 million in surplus value, plus another $3.5 million for picks 43 and 63. Given the changes to the economics of baseball since 2009, that number could be even higher.

Tampa Bay Rays
Top 90 Picks: #24, #31, #32, #38, #41, #42, #52, #56, #59, #60, #75, #89

Carl Crawford (24, 38). Rafael Soriano (31, 42). Grant Balfour (41, 75). Joaquin Benoit (52). Randy Choate (56). Brad Hawpe (59). Chad Qualls (60). The Rays know they can’t just build their farm systems from perennial top-tier picks now that they’re contenders, so they exploited the frig (to wax Cistullian for a second) out of the ELIAS draft pick compensation system. The Rays couldn’t control Carl Crawford’s departure, but one has to assume that the acquisition of Soriano was made with Type A status in mind, and the Rays had no intention of re-signing guys like Balfour, Benoit, Choate, Qualls, or Hawpe because they knew that (a) the money could best be spent elsewhere and (b) the draft picks could hold immense value in a deep draft and potentially in the last season of this kind of compensation. According to Wang’s research, the Rays could realize around $31 million in surplus value from these picks (and again, this is in 2009 economics, so possibly more).

San Diego Padres
Top 90 Picks: #10 #25 #48 #54 #58 #82

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Like the Diamondbacks, the Padres are the beneficiaries of a compensatory pick for failing to sign last year’s draft pick. That pick was ninth overall Karsten Whitson, who decided not to sign with the Padres (unlike Loux, who actually planned on signing with Arizona). As a result, the Padres have a top 10 pick despite finishing with 90 wins. The departures of Jon Garland, Yorvit Torrealba, and Kevin Correia – useful pieces, but replaceable – also brought in supplemental picks. The Padres right now are looking at just under $20 million in surplus value out of these picks.

A few other teams deserve mention too – the Red Sox have picks 19, 26, 36, 40, and 81, and the Blue Jays have 21, 35, 46, 53, 57, 74, and 78 (as I covered here). In an incredibly deep draft, these five teams look to benefit the most on draft weekend.





Jack Moore's work can be seen at VICE Sports and anywhere else you're willing to pay him to write. Buy his e-book.

19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Adam
15 years ago

No Blue Jays?

Adam
15 years ago
Reply to  Adam

just wondering what Mr. Wang has in monetary value for the Jays’ picks

Jack Moore
15 years ago
Reply to  Adam

I believe around $17 million.

odbsol
15 years ago
Reply to  Adam

+1. My first thought.

fip_drip
15 years ago

FWIW, in a WEEI podcast Law says he expects the Red Sox to break the record for most money spent on a draft in 2011 due to talent and the team feeling this is the last draft in which they can flex their financial muscle before draft reform takes place.

gu03alum
15 years ago

If that’s true about what the Diamondbacks did to Loux then this system is more broken than I originally thought. I hope it gets completely overhauled for next year’s draft.

Stairmaster Jenkins
15 years ago
Reply to  gu03alum

Boy, it would be hard to prove that Arizona intended to follow exactly the path they ended up following with Barrett Loux when they selected him. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt & assume that they overdrafted Loux primarily due to ease of signability but the fact that they didn’t even persue signing him for a much lower amount doesn’t exactly fill me with belief.

Stairmaster Jenkins
15 years ago

That’d be ‘pursue’. Was I thinking of ‘peruse’?

Anyways, yes, Arizona is sitting pretty with two top 10 picks this year. I’d have to imagine that they have ample budgeting also.

DiamondbackDave
15 years ago

I think the approach that th D’Backs took with Loux last draft season could easily be considered a bit of an abuse of the system if only Loux had not failed an initial physical. Loux’s failing a physical off the bat pretty much lets the D’Backs off the hook regardless of whatever their initial intentions ever were.

Terry
15 years ago

Is this taking into account that Mr. Kevin Towers is making the picks? History does find a way to repeat itself a.k.a. SmallMoney prospects.

Drakos
15 years ago

Minor correction, but the Red Sox second pick is #26 no #25.

Max G
15 years ago

I concur with Adam. The ommission of the Bluejays in this article is glaring, seeing how it has been discussed on Fangraphs previously that the Jays have positioned themselves well with an enormous amount of picks in this unusually deep draft.

Brad Johnson
15 years ago
Reply to  Max G

Reread the last paragraph…

ICEYhawtSTUNNAZ
15 years ago

Did the Red Sox get a pick for Lopez? I thought that, since he signed a minor league deal, they didn’t receive any compensation?

Ari Collins
15 years ago

No comp for Lopez. Still 4 of the first 40, though.

Neal Huntington
15 years ago

I am sure glad this free agent compensation system is so helpful. Pick #1 and no pick again until #61. Don’t worry though the rays got a pick for Brad freaking Hawpe.

The Bunk
15 years ago

Hey, you get Rendon(probably, assuming his previous injury doesn’t effect him), you’re the envy of the league.

Keian
15 years ago

This may be a little tangential, but I think that there should be a caveat to this article, especially WRT to the Padres. For the team to actually realize this value, they have to actually pick the best player available AND sign them. Unfortunately, due to the way the system is, the Pads as a small market team that can’t do both. If they sign all their picks, the players surely won’t be the best available at that time in the draft. And if they take the best available, they won’t be able to sign them (see the 2010 Draft as exhibit A).

Isaac
15 years ago

You actually need to know about the padres to understand the padres; so maybe it would be good if someone wrote an article about them and their farm. Over the last 5 year’s they’ve invested heavily in their farm system. It’s easily the most underrated. In 2008 (not positive off the top of my head on the year) they signed 4 of the top 10 international prospects (those guys are 16 when they sign and get paid millions). Under Fuson, like just the same now under McCleod, the padres constantly paid over slot for draft picks. That’s how they got Latos, that’s how they got multiple players in last year’s, and the year before draft. The only real knock on their drafting is the success of their 1st round picks. Many people blame the Alderson era for Matt Bush; but Kevin Towers chose Matt Bush when he was still in control of the draft. Under Fuson and Alderson most of the 1st rounders have been hurt and or bust; but Tim Stauffer is turning into an elite pitcher. He had a 1.85 era last year. In Fuson’s last draft (2009) they took a pretty big gamble drafting Tate 3rd. Now I know the pads are a small market team; but just because they don’t have a high mlb payroll, it doesn’t mean that they don’t draft the best players in their opinion. They are one of the top spending teams on prospects. People don’t realize this because of the national media’s coverage of their mlb team. It’s true that they have one of the lowest payrolls; but a team in the city of San Diego can handle at least 60-80 million in payroll. Their financial problem is their tv deal that’s about to expire (at that time their profits will increase); but also their principal owner is still in the process of paying for the team. The padres for at least 3 year’s have been focused on building waves of players from within. With a small payroll the new ownership can survive, and then when their own players make it to the majors, they can sign the one’s they want to keep, but if in that position they have a quality prospect or prospects behind for replacement, then they’ll let that player go and get 1 to 2 picks.