Eduardo Rodriguez Opts for the Tigers

The Tigers have been going through a prolonged down period. The last season they finished above .500 was 2016, and the intervening years have been brutal — 2021 was the first year where they won even 40% of their games since that ’16 season. This year’s team was full of interesting players, and Riley Greene and Spencer Torkelson should be ready soon, but the Tigers still needed a talent infusion if they wanted to compete next year.

Enter Eduardo Rodriguez, a perfect fit for the Tigers. Rodriguez signed a five-year, $77 million deal to join Detroit. He’s the first big signing of the offseason, and the symbolism of the Tigers opening the free agency market as they open their window of contention is fun to think about, even if it’s mainly just a fun fact. The Tigers are coming! Let’s talk about three things in order: what Rodriguez brings to the table, why Detroit wanted a starter, and the particulars of his contract.

First things first: Rodriguez isn’t your average 4.74 ERA starter. He was quite poor in the run prevention department this year, but under the hood, his statistics looked far more enticing. He set a career high in strikeout rate and a career low in walk rate, welcome improvements for a pitcher who was already above average. He made 31 starts, showing no rust after missing all of the 2020 season due to a heart condition. He missed as many bats as ever, surrendered fewer barrels than the average pitcher, and generally looked like a star.

Except, again, for that pesky ERA. What gives? In essence, I think that Rodriguez got unlucky in a way that won’t likely repeat. He allowed a .366 BABIP, the second-worst mark in the majors. He did so despite fairly benign contact quality — his line drive rate was only 22.4%, so it’s not like he was just serving up meatball after meatball that the other team smashed for doubles. His hard-hit rate was below league average. Fenway is a tough home park for a lefty, and the Red Sox defense did him no favors — batters hit .313 on grounders against him, the highest mark in the game by nearly 30 points.

Boston’s defense was the worst in baseball according to OAA. Detroit’s was 21st — but they were 24 runs better than Boston, a big margin. Better defenders plus better luck — no matter who’s standing behind you, no one gives up a .313 BABIP on groundballs indefinitely — could move Rodriguez’s ERA southward in a hurry. Even if he’s unlikely to repeat his peripherals from 2021, that’s a lot of improvement — Steamer pegs him for a 3.65 ERA, and ZiPS checks in at 3.93. Here’s that aforementioned ZiPS projection:

ZiPS Projection – Eduardo Rodriguez (Preliminary)
Year W L S ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
2022 12 9 0 3.93 31 30 162.7 152 71 20 52 176 115 3.1
2023 11 8 0 3.92 28 27 149.3 139 65 19 48 160 115 2.9
2024 10 8 0 4.01 28 27 146.0 137 65 19 47 154 113 2.7
2025 10 7 0 4.01 26 25 137.0 128 61 18 44 145 113 2.5
2026 9 7 0 4.07 24 24 128.3 121 58 17 41 136 111 2.3

When pitchers show a sudden improvement in strikeout and walk rate, their projections sometimes lag behind their true talent. That’s often because they’ve changed something fundamental about their game — added a new pitch, say, or gained velocity by switching roles. That’s not the case with Rodriguez. He’s the same pitcher as always — fastball, cutter, and changeup primarily, with a slider sprinkled in for taste. I tend to believe the projection systems — he’ll be a solid starter, though perhaps not one you should count on for 200 innings per year.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

That’s exactly what Detroit needs. Their trio of prospect arms all graduated in 2021, and they’ll follow Rodriguez in the rotation in some order. Past that, the team has a lot of maybes: Tyler Alexander will chip in some starts, Matthew Boyd will return from injury at some point, and Michael Fulmer could likely be pressed into service if necessary. Adding Rodriguez turns the rotation from “interesting but thin” to solid. Adding another arm, perhaps Alex Cobb or Michael Pineda, would even give them flexibility to run a six-man rotation, which would suit the young arms.

There have been rumblings that Detroit is out to add more top-line free agents this winter. Even with Rodriguez in the fold, their payroll checks in around $105 million for 2022. They may not approach the $200 million payroll bill they lived at during Michael Ilitch’s run as owner, but there’s room to add, particularly given that Miguel Cabrera’s contract is up after 2023. Carlos Correa is reputedly their top target, and that makes perfect sense to me: he could reunite with his old manager and be the best player on a young, exciting team that could battle the White Sox and Twins for AL Central supremacy. By adding Rodriguez, the Tigers have put themselves in position to challenge the .500 mark. By adding another top-end free agent, they could accelerate their timeline even further, with more reinforcements on the way.

How do the dollars and cents of the deal stack up? It depends on how you value Rodriguez’s opt out. After receiving $14 million in each of 2022 and ’23, Rodriguez can either choose to become a free agent or take the three-year, $49 million balance of the deal. How much, then, should he expect to clear over the next five years? I used my handy option calculator to find out.

Per my calculations, Rodriguez will opt out of his deal 54% of the time (assuming ZiPS projections are a central case for his true talent level). When he does that, it’s because he’s either a) turned into a front-line starter producing 4-5 WAR per season or b) put together two straight three-plus WAR seasons while the cost of a win skyrockets. It’s worth noting that the cost of a win skyrocketing could happen for many reasons, including unintended consequences of the new CBA. I didn’t include extra volatility in the model to account for the upcoming negotiations, but that’s a welcome side effect of Rodriguez’s opt out.

When he does opt out, the model thinks that he’ll secure the equivalent of a three-year, $80 million dollar deal to replace the $49 million he’s leaving on the table. That sounds high, but remember: it’s only in the top half of Rodriguez outcomes. A 30-year-old pitcher securing a high-value deal after two good seasons? It’s hardly outside the realm of possibility, and in plenty of those situations, the cost of a win has gone up as well (the model varies the cost of a win randomly each year, though it trends upwards on average).

What would you pay for a 54% chance at making $80 million instead of $49 million? If you were perfectly risk-neutral, you’d pay $16.74 million, so one way to think of Rodriguez’s deal is just tacking $16.74 million onto the total value. That would make it a five-year, $93.74 million deal.

You don’t have to think of it that way, of course. The Tigers certainly aren’t paying that money. But consider this: in the 46% of situations where Rodriguez doesn’t exercise his opt out, he accrues an average of 7.2 WAR across all five years of the deal. This is the bottom half of the distribution; that’s a 1.4-WAR player every year, in a deal likely interrupted by injury and underperformance. In the 54% of situations where he does exercise his opt out, he projects to accrue 6.9 WAR — in only two years. That’s the good half of outcomes when they get Rodriguez — an under-market, two-year deal for a star.

This deal makes sense to me for Rodriguez. His value isn’t set in stone — some people think he’s just an innings eater, while some think he’s an All-Star level pitcher. If he truly is just a bulk innings guy with roughly average results, then five years and $77 million seems about right. If he’s more than that, he can dip back into free agency at 30 and ask for more.

Personally, I think he’ll hit the top half of his distribution. I’m high on Rodriguez’s consistency — not in the ERA column, at least yet, but in his pitch mix and peripheral numbers. He looks like someone who gives you a mid-3.00s ERA year in and year out without much fuss. That would obviously be a coup for the Tigers. Sure, he might leave after two years if he crushes it, but there’s also a hidden mode in most contracts with opt outs. If Rodriguez excels but likes Detroit — and if he’s excelling, it’s reasonable to think he’ll like Detroit — the two sides could simply tear up the last three years of his contract and sign an extension.

There’s a lot to like about this deal for both sides. The Tigers get a top-line starting pitcher. Rodriguez gets both cost certainty and another shot at a big payday. Both sides get that without putting a huge amount of years or dollars on the line. It’s a win-win deal, a fitting opening to this season’s free agent market.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
84
4 years ago

Tyler Alexander will chip in some starts, not Tyler Anderson.

BenZobrist4MVP
4 years ago
Reply to  Ben Clemens

Although, Tyler Anderson is a free agent. I suppose the Tigers could sign him too!

PC1970Member since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  84

Alexander is awesome. Not awesome in performance, but, a fun guy to watch. Old school crafty lefty in the Larry Gura/Tommy John mold. Not sure he even breaks 90 on the gun..but, he set a record for consecutive K’s in 2020 & had a sneaky good 2021.

Not sure he’ll ever be a top of rotation guy, but, he’s a very valuable swing man/5th starter type who can eat 100-120 innings

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

Strong deal for Rodriguez, especially with the QO. I was thinking he’d get a deal something like this, but without the opt-out.

I think it’s a little weird that the Tigers are the ones signing guys like Rodriguez to deals with opt-outs after the 2023 season when 2023 will likely be the first year that both Greene and Torkelson will be up for the entire year. I don’t think it would matter one way or the other if it wasn’t for giving up the pick, but if they’re this hot on Correa (or Seager, or Story) then maybe they figured they were going to lose that pick anyway and they might as well go all out.

VinnieDaGooch
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Tork and Greene will be on the opening day roster if they perform well in ST. Book it.

dl80Member since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  VinnieDaGooch

You misspelled “the day after the service time cutoff.”

PC1970Member since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The Tigers after 2023 have so many unknowns, it almost impossible to say today what they’ll want to do:

– Miggy’s albatross contract is over after 2023, freeing up $31M.
– Mize, Skubal will be close entering arb years, getting more expensive. Manning is 1 year behind them (& needs more work than them, too)
– Turnbull, if he comes back from TJ in 2023 will be in arb guy.
– Boyd is a FA after 2023, too.
– they have Joey Wentz in AAA (They have Faedo, too, but, I don’t see it with him)..& drafted Jobe, Ty Madden in the top 32 picks last year. Will any of those 3 be part of the picture by then?

Guess what I’m getting at is they have $$ coming off the books & about 9-10 guys that look like they COULD be part of the rotation in 2024 & beyond. If Rodriguez lights it up, they should have the $$ to pay him..or maybe they don’t need to if other’s take a step or a Madden looks ready to step in.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

That’s precisely why I’m not quite as high on the move. If they signed him without the opt-out, it would have made so much more sense to me. I usually don’t care one way or the other whether teams put opts out in a deal because usually teams that sign players are looking to win now, and the back half of the contracts never quite live up to the hype anyway (so it’s super easy to give away in a negotiation). But that year he’d be opting out would probably be the year a lot of the other players you mention either peak or start approaching it, and he’d be opting out of his age-31 season. I’d think they’d really want him then.

But again, if it wasn’t for the draft pick, I wouldn’t think it would matter at all. The team isn’t exactly in dire need of cash right now.

steveo
4 years ago

The Tigers probably won’t fully be ready to compete until 2023, but I still like the move. ~17M a year these days is nothing. At least this move shows that they’re ready to spend, which is refreshing these days. The bigger question is why didn’t the Red Sox match this? Seems like a no brainer for them. Mid rotation starter at that price is what they need, really. Right now their rotation is Sale, Eovaldi, Pivetta, Houck, ????. I guess they can still sign Ray or Gray, etc, but this seemed like a no brainer for them. Still a lot of offseason left.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

The team that I’m surprised didn’t try to match or top this is the Angels. Unlike the Tigers, whose contention clock won’t start until 2023 or 2024, the Angels clock is ticking right now, and they’ve apparently just agreed to a one year, $21M deal with Syndergaard (who basically hasn’t pitched in two years). I get that E-Rod has never put up a 6-win season but somehow he wound up getting paid close to that over two years ($28M) while being way more likely to actually pitch over the course of his contract than Syndergaard.

Mahoney
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Funny, when I thought about the Angels maybe trading Adell or Marsh to Miami for one of their young starters, I reached the conclusion that the deal would only make sense if they got Alcantara (more certainty) vs. say Sanchez (more upside but less certainty). They really would have been better off going for E-Rod, even at an AAV closer to 20M, than letting Syndergaard’s agent talk Arte into a one-year deal that still costs the Angels a high draft pick.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

Working in the Angels front office must be incredibly frustrating. It’s also probably frustrating to work for some other teams too (the A’s come to mind) but the Angels are unique in that they do spend a huge amount of money but you probably spend all your time managing up so that Moreno doesn’t do something really foolish.

Mahoney
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

I can only guess, but the Red Sox probably are nervous about where their 2022 salary tax would land if they kept E-Rod. The Tigers have no such worries and, unlike Tucker Barnhart’s former team, aren’t freaked out about short-term poverty in the event games are lost due to the upcoming lockout.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

I totally understand why some owners wouldn’t be excited about a lockout and would think that would hurt their finances. But my understanding is that they also wouldn’t be paid for that time, unless a labor agreement specifically noted that players would paid for that time. And I haven’t seen anyone float that as a possibility.

If that’s the case, then although they’d lose money on those lost games, they wouldn’t lose any more money on those games by signing someone to a big contract. But owners are so allergic to taking any losses, ever, over any time period, that they might not care.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

17 mill for a likely 4 win guy just seems like a crazy steal to me. 2 wins is easy to replace. 3, not so much. 4? Man I dunno.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

I don’t know that he’s a 4-win guy, since he’s never done it. He certainly has that upside. Still, Steamer thinks he’s at 3.5 wins, which is awfully good, and he has the upside for four wins easily.

KwisatzHaderachMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The fit is so good for him too. Reuniting with Nieves, working with Chris Fetter, pitching in Comerica Park, and a division that apart from the White Sox is not packed with scary lineups. We’re very happy with it here in Detroit.

Brock244
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

The Redsox were probably willing to meet the AAV. I would assume the issue for them was a) commiting 5 years and b) the pick compensation

One things about Bloom is that he loves flexibility and depth. He probably felt he could get similar production on a shorter commitment, while also banking the pick

So for instance, maybe in their calculus Jon Gray + Martin Perez would give similar production while also banking the pick and not having to 5yrs.

Kind of similar to last off-season where they grabbed a ton of guys that had the potential to be good, on short term commitments, instead of going for more “sure things” and handing out longer term deals (Odorizzi, Colome, JBJ, etc)

rounders
4 years ago
Reply to  steveo

“The bigger question is why didn’t the Red Sox match this?” For me that is the most interesting part of the contract. Bloom didn’t want him. Bloom needs starting pitching and still didn’t want him, under the hood numbers and all. Conceivably it’s the steady fastball velocity drop. ERod doesn’t project as the crafty lefty who excels with much less than Rodriquez still has.

Sonny LMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  rounders

Bloom might understand better than his predecessor that LHP in Fenway is not something to over commit to…

If Detroit does sign Correa the improvement of the infield defense behind Rodriguez, plus the size of the park, might turn him into a peripheral overachiever.

TimMember since 2022
4 years ago

Great analysis of the signing, Ben. Thanks

Kevbot034
4 years ago

Think he’s a great addition for a team like the Tigers, even if they don’t end up snagging a top line FA. He’s stabilizing a young pitching core that needs stability and has the postseason experience teams really crave. If they upgrade defensively, even marginally, all the better for him and the rest of the young arms. And making those upgrades should be easy enough with Greene coming soonish.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
4 years ago

Given the deal Berrios just signed… what the hell is going on here?

Ericksonb32
4 years ago

One thing: Tigers probably aren’t bringing back Matt Boyd, at least for his projected Arb price (~7.5MM)

KwisatzHaderachMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Ericksonb32

Yeah, although that was always the case. Wouldn’t mind them trying to get Matt to sign a cheap 2-3 year extension to see how he recovers from the surgery, but guess they won’t pay more than $4M a year to do it.

Brock244
4 years ago

Overall this feels like a good move for the Tigers. They get a solid middle of the rotation arm for a fair price + inject some excitement. Their rotation could be incredible.

The one negative I have with this move is the opt out. Had their not been an opt out, I would say this move is moderate risk + high reward (a perfect signing for where they are). But with the opt out, I’d say it’s more moderate risk + moderate reward. I would almost rather rip out that opt out and add 10-15million.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
4 years ago

This deal was a shock to this Red Sox fan. This year was definitely hard to measure. He got off to a good start. . I have always been a strong believer in ERod and after starting 5-0 I was already handing him the Cy Young then the SHTF. Was it the myocarditis? Whatever it was the rest of the season was puzzling. After the 5-0 start the next 8 starts were all similar. He looked better than ever but could not get the final out in a lot of innings. He wasn’t Martin Perez bad. He went at least 4 innings in all of them but gave up between 3 and 6 runs in each one resulting in 35 earned runs in 39.2 innings. After June 22nd he was a capable member of the rotation, but never the ERod of 2019. Even so I thought it was almost certain that the Red Sox would bring him back with an offer that exceeded what he received from the Tigers.

miltonfriedman
4 years ago

Tigers 1 shortstop,1 good right reliever signing away from winning 95 games:
1. Baddoo
2.Correa
3. Grossman
4. Torkelson
5. Candelario
6.Schoop
7.Cabrera
8.Greene
9.Rogers

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  miltonfriedman

Just need to find that 10-WAR shortstop and 5-WAR reliever!

DLHughey
4 years ago

Player opt outs are not that bad for the team.

If the player opts out, the team loses a potential for late-contract surplus value, but definitely removes aging/downside risk on the back end and locks in early contract surplus value.

If the player didn’t opt out, the team saved on AAV/luxury tax since the opt out does have a dollar value in negotiations. Yes, it means the player didnt perform well enough to opt out, but that was happening whether or not the opt out was there as long as the player still signed with the team.