Edwin Díaz Isn’t Fully Back Yet

What’s wrong with Edwin Díaz? In a single GIF, this is what’s wrong with Edwin Díaz:
I don’t want to tell him how to pitch, because he’s Edwin Díaz and I’m an anonymous person on the internet. But putting a slider right in Josh Bell’s nitro zone is not a great way to approach a high-leverage at-bat. Bell put a good swing on it, which was hardly a given, but Díaz put himself into that situation and paid the price for it.
On a superficial level, there’s not a lot of uncertainty over what’s wrong. During the 2023 World Baseball Classic, Díaz tore his patellar tendon, and then he missed the entirety of the season recovering from surgery that repaired that tendon. He’s back on the mound, but he’s clearly not the same pitcher that he was in his dominant 2022 season.
First, there’s his fastball. It averaged 99 miles an hour in 2022. This season, it’s sitting in the 97-98 range, and he still hasn’t surpassed 100 mph on a single pitch. He’d go weeks in 2022 averaging triple digits. It’s a noticeable change in profile:

Now, Díaz’s fastball is still excellent despite the lower velocity. He’s always had a devastating movement profile; his arm slot and long stride produce a shallow approach angle that mystifies hitters at the top of the zone. Hitters are doing more damage than normal when they make contact, but they’re still swinging and missing plenty. Let’s put it this way: For his career, Díaz has allowed a 71% contact rate against his fastball. This year, it’s at 66.7%. From that perspective, things aren’t so terrible.
The problem comes with his slider. That cement mixer to Bell isn’t an isolated incident. Díaz’s transformation from excellent closer to otherworldly force wasn’t built on fastballs. It was built on his turning that slider into a surgical tool. Look at this gorgeous map of his 2022 slider locations:

That’s nearly flawless. He wore out the lower gloveside corner with 90 mph darts. This year, to put it mildly, he hasn’t been doing that:

Commanding that slider low and away made Díaz completely untouchable. He threw 539 sliders in 2022. Opponents hit exactly one of them for extra bases. In 2021, another solid year, he threw 378 sliders and gave up only three doubles with it. All of those hits were on location mistakes in hitter’s counts. This year, he’s already surrendered five extra base hits, including three homers, off his slider. Only one of the 1,099 sliders he threw from 2020 through 2022 was hit for a home run.
The easiest way to describe what’s gone wrong is those two heatmaps, but if you’re not a visual learner, we can do it in numbers too. In 2022, 23.6% of his sliders ended up over the heart of the plate. That number is up to 32.4% this year. On the other hand, he’s still missing the zone badly just as frequently. He’s essentially lost his fine control of the edges of the zone, the location where pitchers almost always win. He hit the shadow zone — the edges of the plate and the area just off of it — 43.1% of the time in 2021 and 38.6% of the time in 2022 with sliders. This year, that number is down to 32.4%.
The news only gets worse from there. Díaz’s slider, like his fastball, is down a few ticks of velocity. Unfortunately, its movement profile didn’t survive the decline in velocity nearly as well as the heater’s did. His slider is now inducing roughly three inches of positive vertical break, or lift. It’s gone from falling half an inch less than similar-looking sliders to falling two inches less than them. For a gyro slider like his, getting the ball to fall more is key. You want the path to diverge as much as possible from normal fastball shape. Instead, his slider is hanging up in the zone. I think that this is both messing with his command and making it easier for hitters to get the head of the bat to the ball.
Don’t just take that movement argument from me, though. PitchingBot thinks that the slider has gone from a 77 on the 20-80 scale to a 63. Stuff+ thinks it’s gone from 165 (normalized around 100) to 119. Both models agree that his command has gotten worse, to boot. You can take a tour of the internet to check out other people’s stuff models, and they’ll all agree. Díaz just isn’t shaping the pitch like he used to. The combination of slower speed and more induced vertical lift just makes it less devastating, no two ways about it.
Unfortunately, the straightforward nature of Díaz’s decline doesn’t make it any easier to fix. His pitches just aren’t working like he needs them to. To make matters worse, he seems less certain of his command – reasonably so, given the change in pitch shape. Not only is he walking 9.1% of opposing batters, his highest mark (excluding a 25-inning 2020 season) since 2017, but he’s doing so despite a plan to avoid walks at any cost.
When Díaz gets behind in the count, he just throws the ball down the middle and hopes for the best. He’s throwing 37.8% of his pitches over the heart of the plate in such situations, the highest mark of his career and among the 15% most aggressive of pitchers across the league. That’s the domain of pitch-to-contact and sinker-dominant types, not swing-and-miss closers. He hangs his slider middle-middle a shocking 41.3% of the time when he’s down in the count. He’s never even approached that mark before.
The solution to this sudden malaise is simple and yet difficult: Díaz needs to get healthy again. Failing that, he needs to adjust to pitching with lower velocity and refine his slider grip to get rid of that pesky extra vertical lift he’s added this year. With the pitch’s current shape, velocity, and location, he simply can’t get away with throwing it as a primary option. Maybe that means developing a slower, sweepier version. Maybe it means going back to working off of his fastball, saving sliders for ambushes. It’s a lot harder to hit an average slider if you’re trying to catch up to 98 up in the zone.
Regardless of what his plan is, Díaz needs to do something, and he knows it. He’s told reporters that he lacks confidence at the moment, and I think that’s a great way of explaining what’s going on. He just isn’t commanding and finishing the slider like he’s used to, and it’s getting in his head. That just spirals, because he needs the slider in bigger spots, and so on and so forth.
The history of patellar tendon injuries in baseball suggests that Díaz will be fine with time. Former Angels hurler Garrett Richards suffered a tear in his landing leg and was back in action within eight months. Zach Eflin tore his in July 2021 and contributed to the bullpen throughout 2022. Matt Strahm has had surgery on both patellar tendons and is pitching better than ever. There’s no clear path back to feeling fully healthy, but the long-term prognosis looks good.
That’s great news, but it doesn’t do a lot to help out in the present. The Mets are mired below .500 despite some solid individual performances; their BaseRuns record is 23-23, and they’re still very much in the playoff hunt. Their bullpen has been among the best in baseball despite Díaz’s struggles; Reed Garrett has been sublime and the middle innings crew has also been excellent. Carlos Mendoza indicated that Díaz will take on some lower-leverage work while he rounds back into form. That seems like a good plan to me. This isn’t a case of a manager reacting to small-sample-size struggles. Díaz is just worse right now. The trumpets will surely play in Citi Field again, but their conductor needs to get right first.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
Nice article that does a good job of elucidating what every Mets fan already knew; Diaz is currently not Diaz. I believe the authors don’t write the sub-heads on the main page, but the whole “don’t put your heads in the sand Mets fans” line rang really false.
Mets fans are some of the the best at identifying every flaw with every player before they happen, and even better at identifying flaws that never come to fruition.
I’m not sure defending Mets fandom to non Mets fans is ever gonna work, but I wonder how much of this is still because of the narrative of the trade at the time (which has taken such a weird turn from Anderson-Bagwell comps into minor irrelevance).
Now, Mets fans hating on Lindor indiscriminately because they can’t identify positive qualities in players while beatifying Alonso…
Mets fans are so naturally panicky that I assumed that line was a little winking joke.
OTOH, we’re also so naturally sarcastic that it confuses me that someone actually managed to miss this.
An entire article without mentioning that his xFIP/SIERA are 2.89/2.40. Yeah, he has a bad ERA because he has a 28% HR/FB rate but a closer with a 26% K-BB should have nowhere near a 5 ERA. He’s not 2022 Diaz, who was one of the most dominant pitchers ever, but he’s still extremely good once you factor out bad luck that’s happened in a tiny sample.
On your critiques – reduced velo and reduced Stuff+ is basically double counting for the same thing. Yes, the velo is down but with normalized HR/FB, he’s still a top tier closer. Also, you mention ignoring the 25 IP small sample in 2020 for his BB rate but we’re not supposed to also ignore that 2024 sample is just 18 IP? His average EV allowed is 84.8 mph, even lower than 2022.
The point of the article is that you can’t just attribute the homeruns to “bad luck”. He’s making demonstrably worse pitches.
What’s the average HR/FB rate for a pitcher with 119 Stuff+? I’m guessing it’s not 28%.
Diaz ranks 16th out of 434 pitchers with 10+ IP on HR/FB rate this year.
2.85 xERA.
“reduced velo and reduced Stuff+ is basically double counting for the same thing”
It most definitely is not, not when stuff+ accounts for multiple other factors beyond velocity.
Bad luck isn’t why his sliders aren’t moving as much and batters are able to square up to it. His numbers aren’t going to magically adjust without him doing anything different. Especially when for every stat you can list that shows he’s fine there’s others to indicate he’s not, like barrel rate, xWOBA, and xSLG, all as high or worse than his 2019 season.
Luck implies he has no reason to adjust, despite plenty of data so far in a third of a season to indicate he needs to adjust something.
“His numbers aren’t going to magically adjust without him doing anything different.”
Yes, they probably will. xWOBA and xSLG are both descriptive stats that are basically meaningless over 18 IP. Predictive ones like xFIP/SIERA/K-BB all think Diaz is still amazing. I will trust those over someone’s eye-test that Diaz “deserved” 5 of his 18 flyballs to be home runs.
To your Stuff+ argument, here’s how Diaz breaks down over the last five years: https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=0&type=36&month=0&ind=1&players=14710&startdate=&enddate=&season1=2019&season=2024&sortcol=0&sortdir=asc&pagenum=1.
If you don’t want to click, his stuff+ from 20-24 is: 119, 116, 143, 114. Yes, his stuff+ is down from 2022, but that’s the outlier, not 2024. Diaz actually has a better Pitching+ (107) in 2024 than 2020 or 2021.
Back to your location argument, Diaz’s location+ from 20-24 is 94, 98, 100, 96. Strange that Diaz had a 1.75 ERA in 2020 with a worse location+ than 2024….perhaps it’s because ERA as a measure of pitching performance is terrible!
Extremely good pitchers don’t say they lack confidence and get demoted my man. Glad you found one number among a ton that paints a slightly rosier pitcher. But I’m inclined to listen to Diaz and his coach.
“Extremely good pitchers don’t say they lack confidence and get demoted my man”
Yes, it actually happens a lot. It’s even happened to Diaz before.
Not only is his velocity on his fastball down, but as is his slider velo down as well and it seems like his command has dropped a grade. He was doing well even with the reduced velo for the first month but since Morel homered off of him in late April it has mostly been a struggle that has been worsening. He has at times shied away from the fastball and now he’s lost slider command and he looked like the Diaz of 2019 on Saturday. I’d like to see him get some low leverage work but the Mets are seemingly in close games nightly and haven’t blown anyone out since the 16-4 win against the Braves six weeks ago.
I would prefer to keep Garrett in his role as the fireman rather than the closer, but I suspect he’ll share the job with Ottavino if or until Diaz gets fixed.
Yes, his fastball is down a tick, but I can’t help but wonder if the image we see above is a bit distorted based on how it was sampled. I’d like to see a few of his other seasons prior to the previous two, and also keep in mind that the bottom of the graph is cut off below 94 mph, and when you do that, it often distorts the picture. Yes, it would be hard to discern the difference if you included the y axis all the way down to 0 mph, which is obviously useless information all the way down that far, but I’m just saying that these truncated images do give a little bit of a false sense of the data being presented.
Diaz’s velocity has ticked up a bit since the start of the season, but it’s certainly not coming back fast enough. Does anyone have a reasonable guess as to when (or, *gulp*, if?) he might get his heater all the way back?
Feel for Diaz. He cares a lot about his craft and I find him to be very likeable. it was a sh!tty way he was injured and altered his career trajectory. Hopefully he finds his full health and mechanics soon. The underlying metrics don’t sound good but I hope he may be closer than it appears🤞
Good article, and got a huge laugh from the assertion that the Mets are “very much in the playoff hunt.” Comedy gold.
HUH? Have you looked at the NL standings lately? The Phillies, Dodgers, Braves, Brewers, and Cubs have a significant gap above everyone else. But GUESS WHAT? SIX teams make the playoffs in each league. Right now, the 6th team is the Padres at 25-26. Therefore, they are only 3 games out of the 6 seed. Yes, there are several teams ahead of them they’d have to leapfrog over: SF, AZ, STL, PIT, and yes, even WASH, but they are all clustered relatively closely. There is SOME talent on that team, and it’s not ridiculous (or comic) to say that they don’t have a chance and are already out of the playoff hunt.
Therefore, based on facts, your comment is the one that’s actually “comedy gold”.
Have you actually watched them play? I couldn’t care less what other teams are doing. You’re citing the Nats with a straight face? This team sits behind the freaking Nats, yet you think they’re contenders. I’ve been saying since before the 2023 season that this is a bad team, everyone gets upset with me for saying it, and yet, they’ve been a bad team. I’ve seen nothing to convince me otherwise. I’ve come to accept that I root for them because I deeply hate myself.