Eugenio Suárez, Available for Cheap to a Good Home

Joe Nicholson-USA TODAY Sports

Up in Seattle, the Mariners had a problem. Eugenio Suárez, who the team initially acquired as salary ballast in the trade that brought them Jesse Winker, was due to make $11 million next year – $13 million if you count a buyout on a team option for 2025. This wasn’t a huge problem – Suárez had been solid since joining the team, racking up 7.3 WAR in two seasons – but for a club whose payroll has bounced around between $110 million and $140 million in recent years, it’s a sizable chunk of the puzzle.

What’s more, Jerry Dipoto telegraphed the team’s intention to favor long-term budget sustainability over short-term upgrades in his now-infamous 54% remark. Dipoto apologized for the tone of those comments – “doing the fans a favor” is just not a good way to phrase things – but the broad point was hard to miss. The Mariners are committed to building their team for the long run on their own terms, which seems to mean prioritizing payroll savings and cost-controlled players wherever possible.

When the team traded for Luis Urías, the writing was on the wall: Suárez was going to get traded. A franchise that thinks long and hard about every dollar it spends probably wouldn’t pick up a platoon/backup infielder making roughly $5 million in arbitration; he was the eighth-highest-paid player on the team, a baffling use of resources given the constraints. So someone had to go, and the obvious bet was Suárez. Now the Mariners just needed a trade partner.

Luckily, the answer was only a time zone away. Nobody wanted to admit it during the Diamondbacks’ playoff run, but third base was a problem for them. Evan Longoria was a fun story, a veteran presence on a team of brash youngsters, but he struck out 30% of the time, a career high, and posted an overall line only a tenth of a win above replacement level. He’s also a free agent, but even if the Diamondbacks were to bring him back, he’s probably not a key contributor at this stage of his career. Emmanuel Rivera, who played 65 games at third, is a better fielder but a worse hitter. That’s an extremely weak position for a playoff contender, let alone one that just appeared in the World Series.

We’re somewhat far into this article, but here’s the trade: Suárez goes to the Diamondbacks in exchange for catcher Seby Zavala and reliever Carlos Vargas. If you got a lot of your knowledge about the Diamondbacks from their playoff run this fall, you might say “who?” That’s because neither Zavala or Vargas appeared in the postseason. That’s a fair criticism of the trade – the return is definitely on the light side – but they’re at least somewhat interesting in their own right.

Zavala is an archetypical backup catcher. He popped a 110 wRC+ in limited action in 2022, leading to a career year, but that’s not his skill set. He’s a great blocker and receiver, finishing in the top 10 for blocking runs and top 15 for framing runs despite barely catching 500 innings in 2023. He struggled to control the running game, but made up for it with the rest of his defensive excellence. He also can’t hit, but that’s par for the course with backup catchers. He’ll start the season as Cal Raleigh’s understudy, a role the Mariners really needed to fill; otherwise, they’d be dipping into free agency for a part-time player.

Vargas unquestionably has more upside than Zavala. He’s a two-pitch reliever, but those two pitches are both huge. He touches 100 with a four-seamer and has a transcendent lower-90s cutter/slider hybrid. It’s a unicorn of a pitch; across all big leaguers, only Joe Kelly threw a slider or cutter with his combination of downward movement and velocity. When batters gear up for 100 and get a pitch that is still fast enough to make you miss, but also drops 20 inches more than his fastball, they’re prone to looking silly. Vargas also mixes in a sinker, and even the occasional changeup, but his four-seamer and breaking ball are his main assets.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

There’s obviously going to be a “but” here; after all, the Diamondbacks could have used another impact reliever this October. Vargas struggles exactly where you’d guess – with his command. He walked 15% of the batters he faced in Triple-A this year, then walked 18% of opponents in a brief major league cameo. He also shockingly struggled to miss bats, posting a career-low 9.5% swinging strike rate in the minors. My guess is that a lot of that is command – you get fewer bad swings when you’re behind in the count – and some is a flatter fastball than in previous years.

Either way, Vargas is a high-risk/high-reward option for the Mariners, who have done a great job unlocking a new level in their relievers in recent years. Heck, they just traded Paul Sewald to the Diamondbacks to fill in some major league roster holes. Dominic Canzone and Josh Rojas, both acquired for Sewald, are part of the reason the team decided to trade Suárez at all. If they can work with Vargas to get the most out of that hellacious cutter, they might have another fine addition to their bullpen collection.

Those are the bit parts; Suárez is obviously the main attraction in this trade. He slots in towards the top of Arizona’s lineup right away, a righty home run threat to complement the speed and on-base percentage at the top of the lineup. The Diamondbacks were light on firepower in 2023 and succeeded in spite of it; in an ideal world, Suárez transmutes a roster spot that used to be a weakness into a strength.

Working against that interpretation of things: Suárez wasn’t a particularly great hitter in 2023. He was still quite valuable, but a huge chunk of that value came from his defense at third base. He posted a 102 wRC+ thanks to a 30.8% strikeout rate. That makes three out of the last four years where his wRC+ has been no better than 102, an arbitrary cutoff, to be sure, but a worrisome sign nonetheless.

Suárez’s game has always involved plenty of strikeouts; in 2022, for example, he struck out 31.2% of the time but was still 30% above average offensively. He makes the whole package work by putting the ball in the air and, frequently, out of the park. From 2016 through 2022, he posted a .229 ISO and hit 207 homers, sixth-most in baseball. Some of that can be attributed to the hitter’s park in Cincinnati where he spent most of those years, but he launched 31 homers in Seattle in 2022. He has a gift for getting his barrel on the ball and putting it in the air.

He didn’t do anything obviously different in 2023 that led to a worse offensive performance. Here’s a fun way of looking at it; take a look at his Statcast bar graphs for 2022:

And 2023:

As you can see, he repeated the same skills in both years. He doesn’t chase very often, though when he does, he swings and misses frequently. He hits the ball at homer-friendly angles quite often – that’s sweet spot rate, more or less. He hits the ball hard at those angles a lot – barrel rate. And that power, combined with his batting eye, leads to plenty of walks. The problem is that all those skills eroded just a little bit in 2023, and to be fair he got a bit unlucky on batted balls to boot.

His all-or-nothing style has produced seasons like this before, and it will do it again. It also puts a lot of pressure on his power; he’s a lock to strike out a ton, so he needs a pile of homers to make up for that. If the ball is flying next year, he’ll be a big beneficiary. A word of warning for Arizona, though: Chase Field is a lousy park for home run hitters these days. The new environment and a natural aging curve lead me to think Suárez will end up right around average offensively.

That will likely be fine with the Diamondbacks, particularly if he plays good defense at third. He’s historically been an asset defensively, with enough range that the Reds once tried to move him to shortstop, with disastrous results to be fair. I see no reason to think he’ll fall off a cliff defensively, but I also don’t think he’s as good as OAA made him out to be in 2023. Defensive metrics are notoriously variable from one year to the next, and DRS thought he was below average, a far cry from the Statcast-enabled metric that loves him.

Put this all together, and Suárez looks like an average contributor in 2024. Expecting him to reprise his excellent 2022 seems unlikely. He’s getting older. He’s probably not one of the best defensive third basemen in the game. But he’s a competent hitter who can play a position where Arizona didn’t have much going on. Over the long grind of a baseball season, avoiding gaping holes in your lineup pays huge dividends. This trade does just that for the Diamondbacks as they attempt to defend their National League crown.

As much as I’m praising Arizona’s side of the deal, I’m not too keen on Seattle’s end, though I understand how it’s logically consistent with the approach to roster building and payroll they’ve settled on. I find their overly miserly spending strategy extremely frustrating; I’m not advocating for a perennial $250 million payroll or anything, but pinching relative pennies when you have Julio Rodríguez and several prime-age pitchers under team control feels like a bad understanding of what’s important. Teams don’t hit Dipoto’s mythical .540 winning percentage by always trying to have one foot in and one foot out; they do it by trying hard to compete when the major league roster is set up for success.

Now that I’ve lodged my complaints about the Mariners’ overarching strategy, though, let’s set that aside for a moment. If they’re going to operate in this strange space where they always try to spend a little to succeed a lot, replacing Suárez with Urías probably moves the needle in the right direction. I think it’s likely that Urías will outproduce Suárez in 2024, and he’s more likely to stay healthy too. If you’re truly dead set on minimizing salary outlay, this switch makes good sense. Vargas might be a plus bullpen arm fairly soon, Zavala provides competent backup catching at a good rate, and it’s not clear that the Mariners’ starting nine is any worse now than it was three weeks ago. Since the Mariners sent a reliever in exchange for Urías, you could pitch this as them coming out net even on the reliever front, even on the third baseman front, and scooping up a backup catcher while saving more than $5 million.

Again, I wouldn’t do that! They haven’t improved their depth at all, and Vargas isn’t as good as Isaiah Campbell, the departed reliever in question. It’s a lot of shuffling without much gain, and the bottom of the Seattle lineup is still dicey. Honestly, dicey might even be giving them too much credit; it’s a pile of platoons with limited major league success. They could just have Urías and Suárez and raise the floor of the team meaningfully. Making salary-saving trades that clearly make the team worse in 2024 is weird when they have a superstar and some complementary pieces.

To recap, the Diamondbacks are getting an upgrade at the cost of two players they didn’t plan on using very much. The Mariners are getting the salary relief they so desperately crave. Both teams can win in this deal, at least in their own accounting, because they have different goals. I think Seattle’s goals are wrong – but if you separate that out, I think they’re at least going about their goals logically. Damning with faint praise? Perhaps, but it’s better than the alternative, and there’s no better way to spin trading one of your team’s four best hitters in the past two years for spare parts.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Nat Lange
2 years ago

In Dipoto’s statement after the trade, he said this trade was “another step toward building the type of deep roster that is required at the Major-League level.” But looking at the return and the state of the roster at the end of the season, I agree with Ben’s take that this is more of a roster churn move than a tangible upgrade or improvement on the depth of the team. Dipoto just has to provide some justification for trading away a fan favorite for such an uninspiring return. I also think the type of hitter that succeeds at T-Mobile Park is missing from the comparison between Suarez and Urias when projecting 2024. When you look at players the Mariners have acquired like Abraham Toro, Kolton Wong, Adam Frazier, and now Luis Urias, they all have (or were supposed to have) high contact ability with less strikeouts and less power. All of those players were epic disappointments (we’ll see about Urias). Players like Suarez, on the other hand, guys whose main skill is thumping the ball out of the ballpark, don’t see the same drastic plummet when moving to Seattle. While acquisitions like Teoscar Hernandez didn’t work out as well as Suarez did for the M’s, Teo’s HR ability gave him a solid enough offensive floor to make up for the drop in singles and doubles production most players experience in Seattle. When looking to next year, Urias does not have the power tool that Suarez has, which makes me cautious to say Urias will perform better in 2024. T-Mobile Park eats players like Urias for breakfast, while players like Suarez are able to preserve more of their offensive value.

catmanwayne
2 years ago
Reply to  Nat Lange

At Urias’s best, he does have just enough thump to be productive in Seattle. He’s also 27, so right in his prime. Frazier, Wong, Strange-Gordon were all slap hitters entering their early-mid 30s, and their carrying tools (defense, speed), were starting to decline when they came over. It’s tough enough to smack base hits around in Seattle, and even tougher still when you’re not running as fast as you used to. Toro is a different case in that he wasn’t a highly touted prospect to begin with, and while he had some decent tools, none of them were going to carry him up to a solid MLB player.

jandys
2 years ago
Reply to  catmanwayne

Urias is not a good defender and is already slow runner at 27. Strange-Gordon in his fourties will be faster runner than Urias in mid twenties. But yeah, Urias carrying tool – plate discipline – is aging well.

darren
2 years ago
Reply to  jandys

Based on what? His defense has been pretty average and his speed was above average before last season, when he was dealing with leg injuries.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  catmanwayne

“At Urias’s best” are a dangerous few words if the Mariners are looking for something from their new infielder. That would be a 100% turn around from the player I watched this past summer. He showed next to nothing, or less, during his ill-fated Red Sox experience. I was stunned, in a good way, that the Red Sox were able to get a potentially useful arm for a player I thought was going to be DFA.

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago

These are the kind of moves that are going to finally break me and get me to give up on being a Mariner’s fan. John Stanton has operated a team that is consistently in the top half of the league in revenue as if they are a small market team. After making a reported league leading $80M in profit in 2022, they were 29th in free agent spending and justified it publicly by alluding to Ohtani’s impending free agency. Now that Ohtani is on the market, it has already been reported that the Mariners won’t even try to sign him, instead they are making moves that have zero baseball benefits and make the team worse in the short term to save John Stanton a little bit of cash.

It seems pretty clear that Stanton viewed making the playoffs once as more than enough and just wants to maximize profits. The teams’ revenue has been right in line with the Angels, Rangers, and Astros, but payroll is $90M less and actively being cut. I truly believe that if Stanton was offered a guaranteed world series win, but his ending profit would be $1M than a non-playoff team, he wouldn’t hesitate to maximize the profits.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

From a baseball perspective this move makes no sense without signing some players to extensions or landing Ohtani. The team has a lot of excellent starting pitching, and what they need is a big bat. Suarez might not be that big bat, but he has sometimes been that in the past. So unless they’re going to get Ohtani this is definitely a step back for 2024.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah. Reading about this trade I immediately assumed that they were clearing payroll for Ohtani. If they aren’t doing that, I don’t know what they’re doing.

TerryMc
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Ben wrote “I think it’s likely that Urías will outproduce Suárez in 2024” which I will agree with. My belief is that Dipoto saw a chance to walk away from the strikeouts without losing production and saving some dollars and took it. Teo and Geno are strikeout machines.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  TerryMc

For what it’s worth, Steamer thinks Urias is about 50% more productive than Suarez is on a rate basis. So there are reasons to think that he will be better than Suarez.

But Suarez has put up 7.3 fWAR in his last two seasons, and Urias has put up 2.2. Heck, Suarez put up more than 50% more fWAR in the last two seasons than Urias has in his whole career. So while it’s entirely possible Urias will outproduce Suarez for any number of reasons, that is not the prediction I would make. Not even a little.

carterMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I agree here. Suarez has 24.4 war for his career. I realize that doesn’t say a lot, and doesn’t say a lot about him moving forward, but that puts him in the top 2% if my math serves me right of mlb players to ever live.

Dag Gummit
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Concur. I personally agree with the risk-reward for this pair of trades.

Campbell seems far superior in past production and has 2 Option years left compared to Vargas’ 1.

With that loss, the Mariners took on a huge Risk-Reward gamble in opting for Urias over Suarez. All to save a few $M for a team with big holes… at the slot Suarez is more likely to fill than Urias?

vbjd1111Member since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

Publicly justified not spending more in the 2022 offseason by alluding to Ohtani’s impending free agency? That would have been very unwise given Ohtani’s well known aversion to discussions about him, even more unwise as it would constitute tampering. Perhaps media and other made that speculation, but Ms management never did.

SculpinMember since 2025
2 years ago
Reply to  vbjd1111

Not sure why this got down-voted. Can anyone come up with a link showing where the Mariners “[justified low spending in free agency] by alluding to Ohtani’s free agency.” I have no recollection of anything like that and can’t even imagine what that allusion would sound like.

vbjd1111Member since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  Sculpin

I attribute the downvotes to the unpopularity of saying anything even neutral (as opposed to negative) about Ms ownership/management. Why let the facts get in the way of a good angry narrative?

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Sculpin

I wasn’t able to find the specific quote, but Dipoto made several comments about maintaining payroll flexibility and not wanting to get locked into long term deals that would prevent them from making moves later. Stuff like “we don’t want to get in a situation where we won’t be able to make a move when the right opportunity comes along” (not a direct quote). Obviously they never cite anyone by name except players currently on the roster.

Comments like those were commonly interpreted as referring to Ohtani as the guy who was considered very close to choosing Seattle the last time around and the only big bat who was likely to become available and had any chance of choosing Seattle. In retrospect, we should have just taken Dipoto at his word when he specifically cited having to pay Logan Gilbert and Cal Raleigh in arbitration.

I suppose I should have given Stanton less credit and believed that when Dipoto said they were a top 10 revenue team and had to plan for paying two young all-stars a combined $12M that was on the level. Never underestimate the cheapness of billionaires, nobody becomes that rich by being content with a quality product and a healthy profit.

thebearproofsuit
2 years ago

I think I was doing the team owner a favor all these years by spending money on tickets and overpriced concessions. From now on I will do the smart Mariners-style cost-cutting move and only follow the team in ways that don’t cost me anything or put any money in the owner’s pocket. I will not be back at Safeco until the team actually spends in line with its revenue or changes ownership.

We were told previous cost-cutting moves were to build up a war chest for when the window for contention was open and that they would go after top-tier free agents when the time was right. And now that the window is open we get…..this. following two disappointing offseasons in which we heard every excuse why we didn’t pursue top-flight free-agent bats…..it’s now very clear that the money-saving moves are not a prelude to anything other than future cheapness.

I’m done.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

A lot of very smart people have thought that Urias was close to a breakout. And he’s been an adequate bat when he’s healthy, but he’s often not and his defense is a mess. For an extra $8M I would much rather have Suárez.

Maybe the reliever turns out to be good, that’s the only thing I can say could go right for the Mariners here.

Mitchell MooreMember since 2020
2 years ago

Agreed, this is not a move that suggests leadership appreciates the opportunity they have before them – having young, two-way studs at the two positions where young, two-way studs are the most scarce and enviable depth of quality, cost-controlled starting pitching at the core of a squad that was 92-70 by BaseRuns last season. This shouldn’t be that hard.

carterMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Mitchell Moore

This could get them to 84-78 next year in BaseRuns, though. Which is all you can really hope for.

Goms
2 years ago

“It’s a lot of shuffling without much gain” is engraved in a hobby lobby style wood sign above Dipoto’s headboard.

Dmjn53
2 years ago

fine move for me. Suarez’s skillset has already lasted a few years longer than I would have guessed, and he can only avoid falling off the cliff for so much longer

RyanMember since 2018
2 years ago

The whole episode with the deals with the Reds for Castillo, Winker and Suárez, along with the signing of Ray, are reinforcing a couple of worrying trends for the M’s front office for me.

#1 What is their long-term plan? The M’s infield is a concerning void of offense with no obvious minor league skill on the horizon. Two Martes, one in Arizona fresh off an NL title (from a much earlier trade) and one just emerging in Cincinnati, are still with the teams the Mariners traded with, but Haniger, Winker & Suárez are now all gone.

You might say, but they still have Castillo. Yes, that is true. And they have Robbie Ray and Logan Gilbert, and George Kirby and Bryce Miller… and that brings me to the second concerning trend:
#2 The team does not seem to know how to project their evaluations/ needs… and they keep missing. The team’s offense has performed poorly both thru development and acquiring. Kelenic, Winker, Suarez, Dee Gordon, and even Haniger were players acquired thru trades that, at best, were good but not great and at worst, simply didn’t work. But all these moves were billed as ‘key’ moves or were meant to be ‘core’ players. Couple that with some unfortunate luck involving ROY Kyle Lewis and Gold Glove winner Evan White… and the Mariners FO keeps failing to deliver whatever mission they are on.

With the exception of JP Crawford, Ty France and Kelenic, the first ‘core group’ of players this FO sold as the future are all gone. Seager retired, Haniger left unsigned, Winker and Suarez are both gone after 2 years.

And the point that further suggests this FO cannot project: the acquisition and signing of Castillo and Robbie Ray despite promising young arms rising within the system.

With the exits of Teo and Suraez, I am curious but pessimistic to see how the FO decides to address the offense now. True – neither was near the team’s best hitter last year. But they were supposed to be. Kuddos for at least moving on… but now how do you replace them while also brining the improvement they were supposed to have brought?

seattlefan68Member since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  Ryan

I agree the vision is lacking a bit in where resources are allocated. A couple of quibbles: you could say they still have the return from the Ketel trade on the team since they traded Segura for Crawford. They also didn’t trade Noelvi for Winker and Suarez, they traded him in the Castillo deal.

dl80Member since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Ryan

I agree with almost everything here, except about Lewis. He was never a very good hitter in the minors, and he won ROY in the pandemic season on the back of an inflated BABIP, mirage power (11 homers and only 3 doubles), and average CF defense. It was an ok season that would have been exposed if it weren’t 60 games long. The next season showed us who he really was.

Baseball is littered with players who came up and had a surprise rookie year that was totally out of line with anything they had ever done before. Almost all of them turned right back into a pumpkin the next year.

JoeyVottoIsGoneMember since 2016
2 years ago

Good vibes only!

chisoxmatt
2 years ago

Suarez 581 k’s over the past 3 years should put this free swinger down in the lineup if he to be any assett too the D Backs. Strikeouts kill rallys and don’t move baseunners over, I’d rather have contact guys down in the lineup, plus Suarez HR totals were down and he doesn’t hit many doubles. Batters like Suarez are a dime a dozen, they put HR ahead of everything even if it means swing and miss. Maybe some GM and managers like that style, but my team would feature more patient, smart, and self sacrificing hitters.

Dag Gummit
2 years ago
Reply to  chisoxmatt

Question: Would you consider the sacrifice fly or a pulled grounder with a runner on 2B by LHH as “smart, and self-sacrificing”?

Because — and I understand that this may seem “strange” to you — those outcomes are increased in direct relationship with high-HR, high-K results. A batter (especially LHH) who tries to pull the ball with full effort is more likely to…

  1. Hit a flyball that would result in a sacrifice fly
  2. Pull the ball on the ground (“good” as a LHH with a runner on 2B and less than 2 outs)
  3. Hit Homeruns (and doubles)
  4. Strikeout

The “grand” point here being that most good (and “good” in the case of moving a runner from 2B to 3B) outcomes for a hitter in baseball are tied to the same set of process-focused behaviors

  1. Swing with full effort
  2. Swing with intent to pull the ball in the air
  3. Don’t swing at pitches you don’t think you can get great results on
KinanikMember since 2016
2 years ago

“Luckily, the answer was only a time zone away.” Actually, right now they’re in the same time zone! Arizona moves to the Pacific time zone in the offseason.

Yes, I am making a big contribution to this conversation.

darren
2 years ago

This wasn’t a huge problem – Suárez had been solid since joining the team, racking up 7.3 WAR in two seasons – but for a club whose payroll has bounced around between $110 million and $140 million in recent years, it’s a sizable chunk of the puzzle.

“Solid” seems like faint praise for someone who’s averaged. That’s ninth in the majors and ~0.5 WAR behind Matt Chapman, who you projected for a 5/$120 mil. deal.

With that said, I think there’s a good chance Urias is better than a backup/platoon player. He’s coming off a lost season and it’s hard to say how much his injury impacted, as well as how much he’ll recover. But he had a good track before the injury and he’s only 27. And FWIW, Steamer projects him as the better player: 1.6 WAR in 409 PA vs. 1.6 WAR in 627 PA.

For a savings of $8 mil+, that seems like a good tradeoff.

Dag Gummit
2 years ago
Reply to  darren

“Solid” seems like faint praise for someone who’s averaged. That’s ninth in the majors and ~0.5 WAR behind Matt Chapman, who you projected for a 5/$120 mil. deal.

“Solid” seems like it’s the right term to me. He’s two years older than Chapman and produced two years at “roughly Chapman-like” levels compared to Chapman’s 5 (2020 excluded).

30-32 is a hugely important age range in baseball terms. 30 is still the height of a player’s prime. After 32, projections lose what semblance of precision they had the few age-years prior. That means the two are not really all that comparable. 27 v 29 year old versions could be. 29 v 31 year old versions also, though less so. 30 v 32… starts to come apart.

That said, there just seems to have been so much more “trade win” potential in dealing away Geno than BUC + AAA RP to me. And, of all things with the this tandem of deals, that is what is getting me. Players coming off of bad-luck-fueled 3-win seasons are worth more than that. Were he his post-2021 self, I’d get it, but with the two following seasons he’s had, it just feels like a huge undersell. If I’m the Mariners’ GM, I’m inclined to say I’d rather have both Urias and Suarez than trade Suarez for that return.