Eulogizing the Departed: Bill Smith Fired

The first domino has fallen following a cataclysmic 2011 season in Twins Territory, as General Manager Bill Smith was dismissed from the position on Monday. Philosophical differences were cited for the split, but according to numerous Twin Cities-area media including Phil Mackey, there was a growing sentiment that Smith was not the proper executive to right the ship following arguably the worst season in the Twins’ 50-plus year history.

In Smith’s stead on an interim-basis is his predecessor, Terry Ryan. There are rumblings that either Wayne Krivsky or Mike Radcliff – whom the Twins denied the Orioles permission to interview for their GM opening – may be the GM in waiting, but Jon Morosi of Fox Sports suggests that Ryan may have the job as long as he wants it. Ryan was the architect of a number of division champions on a much tighter budget, but this bunch provides a whole different challenge, including two oft-injured superstars chewing up nearly 40 percent of his projected (read: slashed) budget.

Now, hindsight is certainly 20/20, but today I’d like to have a look at some of the personnel failures that plagued Smith during his tenure. Before doing so, it’s certainly worth noting that he made some great second-half deals, such as dealing fungible minor league talent for Jon Rauch, Brian Fuentes, Carl Pavano, and Orlando Cabrera down the stretch to propel previous Twins clubs to AL Central titles.

Those moves weren’t nearly enough to save his job, however, as Parker Hageman of Over the Baggy and Star Tribune’s TwinsCentric blog notes. According to Hageman, Smith’s dealings saved the club nearly $8 million, but at a cost of 10.3 WAR. Taking a standard approach of $5 million per win, it isn’t difficult to see where Smith’s pratfalls came into play.

Let’s take a look at the most recent deals that cemented Smith’s demise, so to speak:

For all the second-half wizardry, one such deal looms large on Smith’s list of boners. “Capps for Ramos” is a phrase that will evoke some of the most heinous reactions seen in the otherwise friendly area known as Twins Territory. This was one of the rare deals that left even the average fan scratching its head, even if their logic wasn’t necessarily astute. See, the hype around Ramos at that time reached a fevered pitch after his Jimmie Foxx-esque debut. It wasn’t hard to connect the dots for the average Joe; an oft-injured catcher ought to have a good backup. Still, if Twins fans were overrating Ramos, it appears Smith and the Twins brass underrated him just as much, and promptly dealt him to the nation’s capital for closer Matt Capps.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Oddly, Smith already had a taller, tatted version of Capps in Rauch already in tow, not to mention Capps’ skill set isn’t that of a shutdown closer, and that he was just a half-season removed from being non-tendered by the Pirates. Pesky details aside, Ramos hasn’t exactly lit the Pentagon ablaze offensively in his season-and-a-half out east, but a 3.1 WAR catcher doesn’t grow on money trees, either. Truth is, if Smith knew the club couldn’t continue to turn to Rauch in saves situations – a well-beaten talking point in Twin Cities media circles at the time – why did he turn to an almost identical pitcher, and beyond that send premium talent? This may have been the beginning of the end for Smith, even though Capps fared well down the stretch.

In my mind, the deal that cemented Smith’s demise was the deal to ship J.J. Hardy to Baltimore for Jim Hoey and Brett Jacobsen. Hardy, acquired the previous offseason for Carlos Gomez, was headed toward a sizeable arbitration payday, something Smith and company weren’t inclined to give, so they essentially moved him for pennies on the dollar. One thing that never really clicked in my mind regarding the Hardy situation was why the team dealt Gomez, who for all his faults is and would be an incredibly valuable player to have (especially given the current outfield woes facing the Twins), for a shortstop who was slated to get expensive rather quickly? Why deal for a player who, if he were to play well, would be slated to receive a pay raise if your club is unwilling/unable to meet those demands?

But I digress. The rest is history, as Hardy smacked 30 home runs with an .801 OPS, .343 wOBA, and a scintillating 4.8 WAR, while Tsuyoshi Nishioka, well, didn’t.

There have been countless other dubious moves that further fueled Smith’s building of a cellar dweller. To me, the re-signing of Pavano is near the top of the list. No, from a wins-to-dollars standpoint, bringing Pavano back into the fold isn’t indefensible. However, Smith found himself in a chicken-and-egg scenario, spending money on the pitcher and pinching pennies on the defense that made him who he was, when at least in my view, vice versa would have been the better idea.

There were also a pair of trades in the past that can finally be evaluated on the whole that certainly don’t bolster Smith’s case. The Delmon Young-for-Matt Garza deal didn’t end particularly well, considering both Garza and Jason Bartlett starred for the Rays before moving on to new ventures. The same can be said for the Johan Santana trade, as the lone remaining remnant after all is extrapolated out (Kevin Mulvey -> Rauch, Gomez -> Hardy, etc.) is Deolis Guerra, a largely-failed prospect who may have a future as a middle reliever. Say what you will about Santana’s time in Queens, but the Smith clearly missed the boat in dealing his ace and not receiving a single premium talent in return. At the very least, he could have used Santana for a season and pocketed a pair of draft picks.

Regardless of the timing of the decision, it had become quite clear to everyone that a shake-up was needed at One Twins Way. The only question was whether or not it would occur sooner rather than later. Despite initial indications, this Smith move indicates a seismic shift in which direction the Twins are taking. However, it’s the view of this writer that unless the team adds a more progressive statistical department, history is bound to repeat itself. As for Smith, he’s been offered a position within the Twins front office, but will take his time to decide if he’s going to accept. “I’m going to step back for a little bit here. In 30 years, I haven’t taken many vacations…I’m probably due for some of that,” Smith noted in an interview on ESPN1500 with Mackey and Joe Soucheray. “(I’ll) see if I can sleep better, eat better, get a little exercise, and kind of regroup. Then I’ll make decisions as we go forward.”





In addition to Rotographs, Warne writes about the Minnesota Twins for The Athletic and is a sportswriter for Sportradar U.S. in downtown Minneapolis. Follow him on Twitter @Brandon_Warne, or feel free to email him to do podcasts or for any old reason at brandon.r.warne@gmail-dot-com

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Visnovsky
14 years ago

The crux of the Twins problems going forward.

“However, it’s the view of this writer that unless the team adds a more progressive statistical department, history is bound to repeat itself.”

Brandon Warne
14 years ago
Reply to  Visnovsky

Does this mean you tend to agree?

Notrotographs
14 years ago
Reply to  Brandon Warne

I do.

JCA
14 years ago

The Santana deal might be the most atrocious move when you consider the offers that were on the table but rejected. if the contemporary stories are to be believed, the Red Sox offered an Ellsbury-centered package and a Lester-centered pacakge. Smith held out for both, so he walked away from a Lester / Crisp deal that I think reports had Masterson, Bowden and Kalish in, or an Ellsbury deal with the same latter 3. He also had an attractive package from the NYY but got piggy there too. Epstein and Cashman both woke up and said, “why are we stripping our teams,” and walked away at the same time, leaving Smith with a poor third package.

Sam A.
14 years ago
Reply to  JCA

I also heard a report that the Sox were only trying to bid up the Yankees and that they didn’t want to give up any top players for Santana.

Smith made enough mistakes that we don’t need to get into speculation to look for reasons to criticize his performance.

Brandon Warne
14 years ago

I would love to know exactly what was on the table, and when, for Santana.

Still, pocketing two picks >>>> what Smith got.

vivalajeter
14 years ago
Reply to  Brandon Warne

What are you talking about? They got Gomez, who is “an incredibly valuable player to have” 😛

adohaj
14 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

I know Gomez is really fast which helps him get back to the dugout after he strikes out

mike wants wins
14 years ago

To give Smith a TINY bit of “it isn’t all his fault”….the lack of young players in the majors and old players at AAA isn’t his fault. That’s actually on his replacement (assuming you believe the GM has control of the draft and development processes). Also, let’s be honest. Does anyone think BS got no input from Ryan and the scouts Ryan hired on Nishioka and other moves? We really don’t know how decisions were made there, but it isn’t all his fault (though the Capps and original Young trades were agregious imo).

Robbie G.
14 years ago

In my view, the most important individual in any pro sports organization is the owner (or the ownership group, if we want to call that a person, and we may as well). The owner signs off on everything. A good owner will perform a rational job search, hire someone who seems to know what s/he is doing, explain to that person (the GM, obviously) what the budgetary constraints are, gives the GM the requisite resources to make it work, and lets the GM do his/her job (i.e., no micromanagement) while refusing to sign off on short-sighted/ill-advised moves.

A bad owner will tolerate the likes of Bill Smith and will not only sign off on, say, Wilson Ramos-for-Matt Capps but may even encourage/pressure the GM to make such a clearly short-sighted and idiotic-at-the-time move. A GM is not going to succeed in any such environment, no matter what his/her qualifications might be.

The Twins’ ownership situation has not changed so I wouldn’t expect the team to be managed very differently.

In short: I think we tend to grossly overrate a GM’s value (or lack thereof) as sports fans. Instead, we should look at who is running the show, and how they are running the show. If I go to, say, McDonalds and my food sucks and the service sucks and it takes forever for me to get my food, that’s not the individual employee’s fault, that’s McDonalds’ fault for not properly screening/training/monitoring its employees.

Barkey Walker
14 years ago

I think the Ramos for Capps thing is a bit revisionist. At the time there were not good deals. Teams wanted Ramos to have more time in MLB but the sentiment was that there was already a pretty good catcher there, and he had played about 140 G/year in every year but 07 and they didn’t sign him for $25M/year assuming he would be playing 80 G/year.

Obviously, Capps was a moronic target, but the team and the fans wanted to believe that they could have Nathan back if they closed their eyes and really wanted him back, even if the new Nathan was more stout and less twitchy.

If I was going to point to two problems I’d point to inking a deal with Mauer’s right after a career year. That was just stupid. Yes, he might have stayed that productive, but they were already paying him like he was that productive, so why not wait to see if 2011 was as good as 2010.

Second huge mistake: having a team of soft batts and ground ball pitchers and then building deep fences. If you wanted Mauer to hit tons of HR every year, notice that he always puts his homers just over the fence, and leave them at the depth of the previous field. If you wanted to take advantage of your ground ball pitchers and (comparatively) strong infield, then don’t build the crappiest park for that strategy.

NRJyzr
14 years ago
Reply to  Barkey Walker

The dimensions of Target Field are pretty close to those of the Metrodome, the main exception being the higher RF wall extending farther to center at Target Field.

Barkey Walker
14 years ago
Reply to  NRJyzr

Hmm, interesting. I see that now, but why were guys like Thome and Morneau complaining that it was too hard to hit to the gaps?

Notrotographs
14 years ago
Reply to  Barkey Walker

Ask Seattle how building a park around a franchise player worked out for them.

MNzach
14 years ago

Good *expletive* riddance. Of course this will likely be a drop in the bucket of the regime and philosophy I desire. To me the real problem is orginization wide in that we seem to attempt to build competitive teams, not championship ones.

Ramos for Capps……still shuddering over that one.

DavidCEisen
14 years ago

“lighting the Pentagon ablaze” seems like a very poor metaphor.

Joey B
14 years ago

I don’t like to comment in hindsight, but how can anyone justify the Ramos trade? It doesn’t happen often, but once every 2-3 years, there is a trade so inexplicable, that virtually 100% of the fans simply scratch their heads (Zambrano/Kazmir, Wells/Napoli). As a RS fan, I just wish we had traded for him.

Brandon Warne
14 years ago
Reply to  Joey B

Yep. Pretty much horrible from the get-go, just like the Hardy deal.

Funny and true story: Local columnist in the Twin Cities wrote a “second-guess” column on the Hardy trade. IN JULY.

That’s not second guessing, my friends.

Ron W.
14 years ago

One thing that never really clicked in my mind regarding the Hardy situation was why the team dealt Gomez, who for all his faults is and would be an incredibly valuable player to have

I’m confused by this. Carlos Gomez is, and will continue to be, simply terrible.

He has ~1700 PA’s and an OBP of .291.

Gomez for Hardy was a coup for Smith. It wasn’t the fact that he dealt Hardy a year later, it was what he dealt him for.

Brandon Warne
14 years ago
Reply to  Ron W.

Not a good hitter, but one hell of a defensive player.

The deal was a coup, but if the idea wasn’t “hey, if Hardy is good, let’s keep him around,” then the deal should have never been made in the first place.

A defense of Revere-Gomez-Span this year would certainly be a huge improvement to whatever happened last season.

adohaj
14 years ago
Reply to  Brandon Warne

Giving up plus OF defense and terrible offense. For Plus infield defense and an average to above average bat. Also when Gomez was delt Span was coming off a great debut. S

Brandon Warne
14 years ago
Reply to  Brandon Warne

Again….it was a good deal. Still, if you aren’t going to pay Hardy for what he contributes, why make the deal in the first place.

At worst, you’d still have Gomez, who’d start in CF right now in the spacious confines of Target Field.