Evan Gattis Is Almost Unrecognizable
I’ve written about a few changes like this lately. I wrote about Ryan Goins, whose hot streak coincided with a new unwillingness to swing the bat. I wrote about Joey Votto, whose Bonds-esque second half has come with greater discipline and a preference for very particular strikes. In Goins’ case, the analysis was done in response to improved performance. In Votto’s case, the analysis was done in response to improved performance. There’s nothing quite like that here, no red-hot offensive tear commanding broader attention. Maybe that’s still to come, but I think the observation is interesting enough regardless of everything else.
Evan Gattis is patient now. He’s not Joey Votto-patient. He’s not Matt Carpenter-patient. His patience is relative, but compared to what he’s been, this is a whole different type of hitter. As always, you have to wonder how much of this is actually nothing. Sometimes the numbers we look at aren’t reflective of any deeper truths. But this isn’t based on outcome data. This isn’t based on the usual things that bounce around. This is about swinging. Hitters who like to swing will swing; hitters who like to wait will wait. Gattis has been a swinger. Now Gattis is more of a waiter. This is interesting because of how unexpected it has been.
You never really know when these things start. It’s not like a hitter has ever woken up and just decided, “Today’s the day I start taking pitches.” Patience takes work. It takes re-wiring, and sometimes it can never be achieved. One thing we know about Gattis is this: He didn’t start this season any different. It’s come on. Out of convenience, we can split at the All-Star break. The split works, and the split’s dramatic.
We can look at Gattis’ swing rate over time. Since this year’s break, he’s played 46 games, so this is a 46-game rolling-average plot of Gattis’ swings.
Right now, he’s at an obvious low. While maybe that’s obscured by all the white space, I didn’t want to manipulate the axes. But I could have, because swing rates tend to be found somewhere between 30% and 60%, so Gattis has seen a big drop-off. It used to be that he was a very aggressive swinger. Now he’s more in the neighborhood of average, which is particularly un-Gattis-like.
Gattis swung a lot in the minors. He swung a lot in the majors. Between 2013 and 2014, 310 different players batted at least 500 times each. Gattis had the 14th-highest swing rate. He had the eighth-highest chase rate. He’d strike out, and he’d very seldom walk. People became familiar with Gattis’ offensive identity. After his move to the Houston Astros, there wasn’t any sign of immediate change. Gattis kept swinging — and running into the occasional mammoth dinger. Then something flipped. Something turned on, if you will. Gattis made a change to his approach, readily apparent right here.
By a few percentage points, the contact rate has improved. But the swing rate is way down. The swing rate at strikes is way down. The swing rate at balls is way down. The swing rate at first pitches is way down. There are 326 players who have batted at least 50 times each in both this year’s first and second halves. Gattis easily has the biggest drop in chase rate. He easily has the biggest drop in swing rate. His zone rate, if you’re curious, has barely moved.
This much has to be said: Gattis has yet to catch fire. His second half hasn’t been a real strong one, as he’s improved from just an 89 wRC+ to 98. He remains inconsistent, but he’s probably still adjusting to this approach, and after posting a first-half K-BB% of 19%, his second-half mark is 8%. The power hasn’t left him. If you keep the power — then add walks and subtract strikeouts — it makes sense you’d end up with a better player. That player hasn’t yet totally materialized, but there’s a new sort of promise.
From Baseball Savant, here are Gattis’ first-half swings:
And, his second-half swings:
I know that might not be very helpful, so if you can’t see anything in the images, maybe some data will make things clearer. Gattis hasn’t just reduced his swings across the board. There’s some selectivity at play.
Swing rate at pitches 3 feet or more off the ground
First half: 52%
Second half: 53%
Gattis loves the high pitch. He can clobber some unthinkably high pitches for unthinkable power. He hasn’t been any more patient with pitches at or above belt-level. Which means the changes have happened elsewhere.
Swing rate at pitches no more than 2 feet off the ground
First half: 47%
Second half: 30%
There’s the bulk of it. Gattis has trimmed his first-half rate by more than a third, and a lot of these are attempted put-away pitches. Secondary pitches to make Gattis swing and to make Gattis miss. He hasn’t been spitting on all of them, but he’s been spitting on a lot more of them, and that’s allowed him to get into better hitting positions. These aren’t pitches Gattis could regularly punish. At least, not the low-away ones, where he’s seen the greatest swing-rate decrease. For so many aggressive hitters, you just wish they’d chase less often low and away. Somehow, Gattis has found a way to do it, while remaining aggressive on pitches up.
Again, it hasn’t yet led to tremendous, sustained success. Again, it could eventually reverse itself, if Gattis falls back into old habits. But he’s no longer a catcher, so maybe he has more energy to keep this up. It makes sense that if he does keep this up, he’ll be better for it in the long term. Gattis at the moment is striking out less often, he’s walking more and he’s still fitting in homers. Those are all good things. He’s laying off pitchers’ pitches. That’s a good thing. I don’t know what happened to allow this to happen, but it’s happening. The rewards might be around the corner.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.




Is there any way to change the background color in the heatmap? The blue-on-blue can be hard to see.
I second this if only because, until this comment, I had absolutely no idea there even WERE blue marks on the heatmaps.
So much so I didn’t even see it. Had to scroll back up and look again
Yeah, I’ve been not seeing the blue for however long they’ve been using these until today. Wow.
Wow, I think in the past like today I have been blinking thinking my vision was blurry whenever I see these, now thanks to this I realize my eyes are functioning and it was just the blue on blue, but Jeff always has a reason, and so I wonder if those are so cold of zones that Jeff feels they are some sort a noise and this is how he keeps us focused on what he feels is the important data? It is wild even knowing it is there I blink trying to see clearly. Thanks.
I don’t seem to have that problem, lewish
The Man…now your just yanking on me 🙂
You must have had zero trouble back when that blue/black dress picture was making the rounds. Great catch.
I have to wonder if Gattis has been more aggressive at the plate because of how late he came into organized ball. He would have felt the need to impress the Braves quickly in order to move up quickly, and he has had the ability to hit for power without striking out a crazy amount.
So maybe he’s just now settling into a more patient approach, with the security of being an everyday big leaguer.
Nah, that really was his style coming in and he already had the job. We had lost David Ross and McCann was on the shelf to open the season. Interestingly enough it was after he made the splash when he started pressing as you described. The part that tickles me was how hard he would have kept trying to impress the brass had he been told that success means becoming an OF. Had he known that he might have felt a slump coming. Kidding of course, but I would love to have been a fly on the wall when he was told to start taking fly balls.
An article about Evan Gattis that makes no mention of his 9 triples! What are you trying to do, insightful analysis or something? And what do you mean unrecognizable? He’s the big bald guy w a beard that Grizzly Adams could be proud of! You can’t miss him!
At first I was going to reply, “park effect” but then a quick glance shows that he has 5 triples at home and 4 on the road. So that’s out. Also, when we look at his 2012 AA campaign, he hit triples at a similar rate to 2015.
It is rather curious how such a large man with theoretically slow wheels can leg out so many triples.
Thank you for the Grizzly Adams reference, by the way. However, I do think the most notable beard of all-time belongs to Lanny McDonald in the 1986 Stanley Cup playoffs. It was quite majestic.
His wheels being a little more fresh now that he isn’t catching is my best guess.
Lanny McDonald played in a refrigerated environment and Evan Gattis plays outdoors often, and in some fairly warm southern environments, as well. Once sport adjusted I don’t think there is any comparison to Gattis’ jaw mane, and I also feel, though I can’t find data to support the statement, that GA would agree.
Yeah, but he’s been stuck on 9 triples for almost three weeks. Too busy going for walks I guess.
A week ago he hit a ball into deep right center at MMP that quite possibly would have been a triple with the placement of the outfielders, but it bounced over the fence for a ground rule double.
http://m.astros.mlb.com/hou/video/v434806683/?query=gattis%2Bground%2Brule%2Bdouble
Maybe these improvements will push him above the replacement level…
Love your stuff normally Jeff, but this seems like a stretch considering his numbers are right in line with his entire career, unless of course we are now making big deal’s out of 40 game samples.
The oddness of the sample is exactly the point
Jeff, in your 1st graph it looks like noise, not a meaningful signal though. I’d say Gattis looks exactly recognizable as a guy who walks 5% of the time and K’s over 20% this year. Are you going to write an article on every player who has a odd month? If so, I suggest J.A. Happ 😉
I’m confused… Gattis has a lower BB% this year than last, and he’s terrible. I’d rather hear about Carlos Correa.
Then wait for a Correa article, then comment on that.
I would, but I can’t remember the last time I saw one.
“There are 326 players who have batted at least 50 times each in both this year’s first and second halves. Gattis easily has the biggest drop in chase rate.”
And now just fucking go away.
But he’s terrible. You know, lots of fluctuations happens to -.5 Win players, just most of them end up getting DFA’d and are never heard about.
Thanks for the crude language. I assume you don’t talk like that at your job, if you even have one, Internet Hero?
TKDC – sounds like you could use a stiff drink to take the edge off. Would you like my Dirty Martini recipe? I’ve posted it on here before. My Cadillac Margarita recipe is another good one, but you’ve got to have the patience to squeeze fresh lemon and lime juice, something I doubt you have. Millenials… sigh.
Don’t let these negative comments bother you, BigDaddyCool. Everyone knows that the Fangraphs commentariat is bought and paid for by none other than John Powers Middleton and refuses to tolerate any dissent.
Not that I speak for everyone, but…
I don’t mind reasoned and reasonable dissent.
It’s trolling bullshit (aka BigDaddyCool’s speciality) that I’m not a fan of.
What value was added by the original comment? None.
What insight was shared? None.
It was just a whiny baby, complaining. That’s not a reasoned or reasonable comment. It’s some pathetic dude, who thinks standing up to the big meanies at fangraphs makes him better/smarter/something-er than everyone else.
Give me some actual dissent and I’ll read it! But don’t give me trolling, and call me unreasonable for not taking it seriously.
I disagree. His initial post was making the point that Gattis sucks and this “change” hasn’t changed anything. He swung more than normal (for him) in the beginning of the year, and less than normal (for him) since then. Meh. He is mostly swinging at his career rate, and walking at his career rate, and striking out at his career rate.
This is FanGraphs. It’s not ESPN, it’s not Fox Sports, it’s not HardballTalk. This is what FanGraphs is about. Analyzing data is interesting here, not just “exciting,” “good,” “young,” “hot,” or whatever, players.
Through June:
297 PA
12 BB
.718 OPS
Since July 1:
231 PA
15 BB
.739 OPS
So he’s been terrible all year?
Didn’t the Astros trade valuable pieces to get him? The database hack by the RedBirds must have plugged a false scouting report in there.
Depends on your definition of valuable.
Mike Foltynewiecz has been terrible, Andrew Thurman is a farm-hand, and Rio Ruiz may be something one day, though he has bad stats at AA (granted, young for his level).
Foltyneweicz was the real value in the package, and he has a 5 FIP
Folty is great if you like to see dingers.
Yeah that happens to young pitchers. The stuff is undeniable and the potential is there. It’s pretty much common knowledge that’s what you sign up for when you get young pitching. Even more interesting is how you went for the cheap shot for the purpose of feeding a troll.
Evan Shattis
Barren Sanity
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE can people stop feeding the troll? BigDaddyCool is in the comments of every post, obviously just saying shit to piss people off. Just ignore him for fuck’s sake.
I’m a Braves fan, and if I recall correctly, Gattis had a similar stretch of 40-50 games mid-year of 2013 where his K-rate dropped, BB-rate increased, but it came with pure positive results. I don’t know if the other data matched what the eyes saw but it most definitely felt like he was being much more selective.
I enjoy these articles — adjustments are at the core of what make players great and are critical to success in the big leagues. It is interesting to see what players are trying, especially players mired in a slump. Had the Astros had someone doing this on staff in 2014, they might not have given JD Martinez away for free.
But hey, if someone thinks that every article here should look at a great player and say “hey, that guy is really great,” that’s ok, I guess. Kind of dull if you ask me…
I agree. I thought this was great. What players like Gattis do to succeed(?) is just as much baseball as what adjustments Mike Trout makes…
But I think Jeff left off right before some great questions about selectivity. Gattis went from Aggressive to Average. Is this a good idea? Or is it a no man’s land? In other words, is there a benefit to going from aggressive to average in general? Is there more or less of a benefit to going from aggressive to selective or very selective and jumping over average?
But I did like the article.
No BS, I think I was watching the Astros at the exact moment this change happened. Gattis hit a ball at his shoetops into left field for a single, then seemed to finally have the epiphany (or got scolded in the dugout or something, who knows) that he couldn’t do that every time with a ball that low, and the next at-bat he started taking pitches.
This has been in the back of my head for a while. Mostly because if you could design a gritty power hitter from scratch, he would look like Evan Gattis. He looks like baseball personified, in a way, and those kind of players (David Eckstein!) are always my favorites.