Even the Supposed Powerhouses Have Struggled Lately

Allan Henry-USA TODAY Sports

On any given day in the not-too-distant past, the Yankees, Orioles, Guardians, Dodgers, and Phillies might have laid claims to the best record in their respective leagues, yet all of them have also gone through recent stretches where they’ve looked quite ordinary — and beatable. To cherrypick just a few examples, at the All-Star break the Phillies had the major’s best record at 62-34 (.646), but since then, they’re 11-17 (.393). They were briefly surpassed by the Dodgers, who themselves shirked the mantle of the NL’s top record. Over in the AL, on August 2 the Guardians were an AL-best 67-42… and then they lost seven straight. The Yankees and Orioles have been trading the AL East lead back and forth for most of the season, but over the past two months, both have sub-.500 records. And so on.

At this writing, not a single team has a winning percentage of .600, a pace that equates to just over 97 wins over a full season. If that holds up, it would not only be the first time since 2014 that no team reached 100 wins in a season — excluding the pandemic-shortened 2020 season, of course — but also the first since ’07 that no team reached 97 wins.

In the 25 seasons shown (excluding 2020), that’s a total of 72 teams with at least 97 wins, an average of 2.88 per season, and 41 with at least 100 wins, an average of 1.64 per season. The distribution isn’t consistent; rather it appears we can separate these seasons into three periods:

Teams with High Win Totals Since 1998
Period 97+ 97+/yr 100+ 100+/yr
1998-2006 29 3.22 16 1.78
2007-2014 13 1.63 3 0.38
2015-2023 30 3.75 22 2.75
Total 72 2.88 41 1.64

We’ve had a lot more 97- and 100-win teams in recent years, which makes the lack of such teams playing up to that standard stand out. Here’s the top of the table for 2024, with our Playoff Odds-projected win totals included:

Highest Winning Percentages, 2024
Team W L W% Proj W Proj L ROS W%
Phillies 73 51 .589 93.8 68.2 .548
Dodgers 73 52 .584 94.3 67.7 .576
Yankees 73 52 .584 94.3 67.7 .577
Orioles 73 52 .584 93.0 69.0 .541
Brewers 72 52 .581 91.1 70.9 .502
Guardians 72 52 .581 90.8 71.2 .494
Twins 70 54 .565 90.1 71.9 .528
Padres 70 55 .560 90.0 72.0 .542

That’s some kind of parity, and it could very well make for exciting races to determine which teams get first-round byes and which must run the gauntlet of the Wild Card Series. The parity itself comes as a mild surprise given that we don’t lack for doormats, as the White Sox, Rockies, and Marlins are all on pace to lose at least 100 games. Then again, the 2021–23 seasons each featured four teams losing 100 games, and some of those teams — the Orioles, Diamondbacks, Pirates, and Royals — are finally battling for playoff spots now, a reminder that much of what’s going on here is cyclical.

Checking in on the annual standard deviation of winning percentages — a quick-and-dirty measure of competitive balance — we see that while it has been relatively high in recent years (at its highest during the shortened 2020 season, which I left in for illustrative purposes), this year’s mark of 0.079 is the lowest it’s been since ’17.

It might be tempting to ascribe that downturn to some of the measures put in play via the 2022 Collective Bargaining Agreement, such as the steeper Competitive Balance Tax penalties, the expanded playoff format (which can influence the decision of whether to hold a late-July fire sale or attempt to remain on the fringes of the Wild Card races), and the draft lottery (which disincentivizes taking the express route to the basement). I don’t think we have enough data or a strong enough signal to confirm that, particularly given that for all of the years in the 2018–24 span, the standard deviations of winning percentages are still higher than they were every year during the ’05–17 span, long before those particular incentives were put in place. Those spans don’t line up exactly with the ones I broke out for that 97- and 100-win table, but you can see the way that competitive balance ebbs and flows — and of course, it’s influenced by the prolonged periods of tanking, er, rebuilding, whether we’re talking about the Astros and Cubs in the 2011–14 period, or the current A’s, to say nothing of the ongoing performance art project that is the Rockies.

Anyway, while all of the teams I mentioned in the opening of this article are pretty good ones, none of them appear to be powerhouses. Each club has vulnerabilities, some of which are increasingly glaring and capable of masking even the strongest of performances. Take the Yankees, who after losing Sunday night’s game to the Tigers are 73-52, tied with the Orioles for the AL’s best record. Even with 2023 AL Cy Young winner Gerrit Cole sidelined for the first 75 games of the season, they ran up a 51-24 (.680) record without him by cranking out 5.04 runs per game on offense and holding opponents to 3.36 runs per game, with unexpectedly strong performances from Luis Gil and Clarke Schmidt. With Cole back in the fold, they’ve gone 22-28 (.440) even while their offense has pumped out 5.14 runs per game, because they’ve surrendered a honking 5.34 runs per game, and while Cole hasn’t been in top form, he’s suddenly the least of the rotation’s problems:

Yankees Rotation Since June 19
Pitcher GS IP HR/9 ERA FIP
Gerrit Cole 10 52.0 1.56 4.15 4.20
Marcus Stroman 9 42.2 1.69 5.27 5.48
Luis Gil 9 41.2 1.30 5.62 4.82
Nestor Cortes 9 47.2 1.70 5.85 4.53
Carlos Rodón 10 49.2 2.36 6.16 5.26
Will Warren 3 14.2 1.84 8.59 4.73

That June 19 date marks Cole’s return. You don’t have to be a mathemagician to see the problems here. Everybody is giving up too many homers, and everybody besides Cole and Cortes is averaging fewer than five innings per turn. That’s taxed the bullpen, which has allowed a 4.15 ERA and 4.21 FIP in that span, and which has been slightly worse since the start of the second half. While the offense has its holes (the Yankees’ first, second, and third basemen all made my Replacement Level Killers lists), it has produced a 121 wRC+ since Cole’s return, and a 134 wRC+ since the start of the second half, led by the two best hitters on the planet, Aaron Judge (265 wRC+) and Juan Soto (224 wRC+).

Back to the bullpen, closer Clay Holmes has a respectable 2.88 ERA and 2.46 FIP across 50 innings thus far, right in line with his past two seasons, and he’s already set a career high with 26 saves. Yet thanks in large part to a .350 BABIP, 49 points higher than last year’s mark and 88 points higher than he posted in 2022, he’s been dinked to death. On Sunday night he blew his 10th save of the season. Called on to protect a 1-0 lead, he served up a sizzling one-out double to Colt Keith, then an 81-mph dribbler off the bat of rookie Jace Jung that plated the tying run. The Yankees retook the lead in the 10th, but Mark Leiter Jr., one of their deadline acquisitions, similarly gave up a game-tying hot smash by Zach McKinstry and then an 81-mph opposite field single by Parker Meadows. Holmes, who didn’t allow his first run of the season until May 20, has converted just seven of his past 13 save chances dating back to July 5, and is just two blown saves away from tying the Wild Card-era record, which Leiter’s father incidentally shares with the Guardians’ Emmanuel Clase (2023) and the Royals’ Ambiorix Burgos (12). Manager Aaron Boone reiterated after Sunday’s loss that he has no plans to remove Holmes from the closer role. In fairness, when the alternatives such as Michael Tonkin, Luke Weaver, and Jake Cousins have such short track records of success, you can at least understand the position Boone is in.

The Orioles don’t want to hear about the Yankees’ pitching problems. Dial back to that same June 19 date — which incidentally was also the day that Kyle Bradish had Tommy John surgery, and two days after Tyler Wells had an internal brace procedure, and just over two weeks after John Means had his second TJ — and they’ve gone 26-27 with a staff that’s posted a 5.20 ERA and 4.48 FIP. Corbin Burnes has been decidedly un-ace-like (4.57 ERA, 4.29 FIP) over that 10-start span, Dean Kremer and the now-injured Grayson Rodriguez have been similarly ineffective, and one of the two starters they acquired at the deadline, Trevor Rogers, has been worse, with a 7.53 ERA and 4.78 FIP through his first three turns. Fortunately for Baltimore, the other deadline addition, Zach Eflin, has been great (2.13 ERA, 2.98 FIP through four turns), as has reliever Seranthony Domínguez, who has stepped in at closer now that the Craig Kimbrel Annual Walkathon has come around; Kimbrel has walked 12 men and allowed four homers, 13 runs, and a 1.060 OPS in his past 9 2/3 innings. The team’s offense has almost kept pace with the poor pitching by cranking out just shy of five runs per game during that span, but the Orioles have a -22 run differential dating back to June 19, compared to the Yankees’ -10.

Shall I continue? You can’t stop me. The Dodgers were 29-16 (.644) when Max Muncy played his last game before landing on the injured list with a strained oblique. They’re 44-36 (.550) since then, with the NL’s fourth-best record, and within their own division, the Padres (48-31, .608) and Diamondbacks (48-33, .593) have closed the gap, each climbing to within two games of the NL West lead, a margin unseen since April 24.

Injuries to Mookie Betts, Ryan Brasier, Brusdar Graterol, and a powerhouse rotation’s worth of starters have been a major factor in the Dodgers’ doldrums. Even setting aside the knowledge that Clayton Kershaw would miss half the season while recovering from shoulder surgery, and that Tony Gonsolin would miss all of it due to Tommy John surgery, the absences of Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Tyler Glasnow, Dustin May, Bobby Miller, and Walker Buehler — the last two of whom have struggled mightily in their returns to the point of ineffectiveness — for significant stretches have led the team to dig deep into their depth chart. One of the more promising rookies they unearthed, River Ryan, left his August 10 start shaking his right wrist, a telltale sign of elbow trouble, and sure enough he’s heading for Tommy John surgery as well. Muncy’s long-awaited activation may be accelerated by a day due to concerns about Freddie Freeman’s jammed right middle finger; one can’t help but think the Dodgers are collectively ready to raise both middle fingers and direct them toward the baseball gods.

The $300-million-plus payrolls of the Dodgers and Yankees make it easy for some to justify their schadenfreude, but the Phillies, who rank fourth in payroll at $247 million, aren’t exactly shoe-stringing their way to a division title. They still have a seven-game cushion in the NL East, one game less than at the close of June, when they were 55-29 (.655), but they’re 18-22 (.450) since, with a pitching staff that’s yielded a 5.08 ERA and 4.78 FIP. Aside from Zack Wheeler and a somtimes-wobbly Aaron Nola, their rotation has been a mess over that stretch:

Phillies Rotation Since July 1
Pitcher GS IP HR/9 ERA FIP
Orion Kerkering 2 2.0 0.00 0.00 4.66
Zack Wheeler 7 43.0 1.26 2.72 3.63
Aaron Nola 8 46.1 1.55 3.50 4.59
Kolby Allard 2 9.0 2.00 4.00 5.16
Cristopher Sánchez 8 47.0 0.77 5.55 3.67
Tyler Phillips 6 32.0 1.69 5.91 5.19
Taijuan Walker 2 8.2 3.12 6.23 7.89
Ranger Suárez 3 16.1 1.10 6.61 3.96
Michael Mercado 2 6.2 4.05 8.10 9.76

The big blow has been the loss of Suárez to lower back soreness. He carried a major-league best 1.83 ERA (and a 2.64 FIP) into late June before getting hammered in four starts that ended his hopes of sneaking away with the Cy Young; incidentally Sánchez had the majors’ third-lowest FIP (2.51) at that point. Suárez threw a simulated game last Tuesday, his first time facing hitters since going on the IL, and he’s tentatively lined up to return this weekend. As for the bullpen, which owns a 5.67 ERA and 5.10 FIP since July 1, Domínguez was struggling mightily in the weeks before being traded, and co-closers José Alvarado and Jeff Hoffman have both lost their job. Hell, the team has just two saves in the entire second half, and of its 10 relievers with at least eight innings since the start of July, more have ERAs above 5.00 than below 4.00 (the margin is 5-3). Sure, the sample sizes in there are small, but that lack of reliability isn’t making manager Rob Thomson’s life any easier.

In case you thought I’d avoid picking on the Guardians, whose $101 million payroll is on par with that of the Orioles among the bottom five in the majors, they held a nine-game lead in the AL Central as of June 25, when they were a major league-best 51-26 (.662), but they’re just 21-26 (.447) since, and their lead is now down to two games over the Twins and three over the Royals. Cleveland’s biggest problem over the latter span is an offense that’s slipped from scoring 5.09 runs per game (107 wRC+) over the first span to 3.77 per game (86 wRC+) over the second. Steven Kwan’s hot start has been offset by his .238/.291/.354 (84 wRC+) slash line since June 25, and Andrés Giménez has been even worse (.259/.287/.309, 67 wRC+); in fact only three Guardians (Josh Naylor, Jhonkensy Noel, and José Ramírez) have a wRC+ above 95 over that stretch. The lack of offense from shortstop, center field, right field, and DH has become particularly glaring, and their rotation has a 4.99 ERA and 4.90 FIP since June 25 as well. Yikes.

Small samples, arbitrary endpoints, cherrypicked stats — this thumbnail guide to the top of the table may as well be sponsored by them. With Playoff Odds of at least 92.8% all the way around, none of these teams is in real danger of missing the postseason, and with the exception of the Orioles, all have a better than a coin toss of a chance of winning their divisions. Yet none is filling the niche of a powerhouse, which may feel unsatisfying and at the very least seems jarring, if not actually a problem.

The baseball season is a grind, full of streaks and slumps that in isolation aren’t always representative of the aforementioned players and teams, and this blurry snapshot taken during the dog days of August (more or less) may not be the most flattering. But while the lack of dominant teams may look like a problem when viewed from some vantages, it does set us up for some exciting races over the final six weeks. We’ll see which of these clubs shakes free of their recent miseries, or if we get some very unexpected results when the playoff brackets are finally drawn up.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
jtricheyMember since 2021
2 years ago

It has been a weird season for the good teams. The Braves and Astros included as well.
In the 1980’s 100 win teams were fairly rare so I don’t think missing one of those is that glaring. Having 7 or 8 or 11 teams on the 95-97 win pace is interesting to say the least.
Maybe it is because less teams are all-out tanking right now? At the beginning of the year there weren’t any teams that seemed to be completely in the tank mode. White Sox are now, but I don’t think the Rockies or Marlins packed all their veterans away, and the A’s are beyond the worst part of their tank job.

defiancyMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  jtrichey

While the Braves definitely had some underperformance issues (and still do when we talk about Olson) I think at least for them it’s been the injuries that have played a huge role in their season.

lacslyer
2 years ago
Reply to  defiancy

While the injuries have been a factor, the entire lineup aside from Ozuna and recently Riley have all been under performing significantly from last year.

Think about this, the lineup is still below average overall and if they had 2 or 3 guys playing to their expected level (Olson and Murphy were starting all stars last year and probably didn’t even get votes this year) they’d probably be right on the heels of the Phillies despite their injuries.

KyleMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  jtrichey

What is tanking, to you? I think the Sox are just losing.

KyleMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  Kyle

Let me clarify: when I hear “tanking”, I think of an NBA team losing games on purpose to get a better draft pick. That’s not happening with the White Sox. They would rather win but they are just really bad.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Kyle

Some people just assume anytime a team is cutting costs or trading current players for prospects that means they’re tanking. But I agree with you–tanking is trying to be bad.

I really, really don’t think that fits the White Sox. I think they tried to remain respectable and were just very bad at it. The White Sox kept Luis Robert coming off a 4.9 fWAR season. They traded for a zillion ex-prospects and upper level minors players (Nicky Lopez, Jared Shuster, Braden Shewmake, Dominic Fletcher, Zach DeLoach) hoping they would keep things from getting too bad.

jtricheyMember since 2021
2 years ago
Reply to  Kyle

Which is what I said originally. The Sox weren’t tanking in the traditional sense at the beginning of the year. By the trade deadline I think there was enough of a sell-off that they could be considered to be tanking.

I pretty clearly said that at the beginning of the year no teams were outright tanking.

KyleMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  jtrichey

But trading away a player to get more, younger, cheaper players, isn’t tanking in the NBA sense. It’s rebuilding.

And beyond semantics, recall the White Sox sold players off like cease before the start of the season. Nothing has changed in their strategy.

jtricheyMember since 2021
2 years ago
Reply to  Kyle

So what are you disagreeing with exactly? Rebuilding is really what I mean when I say tanking in a baseball sense. Not the same as basketball exactly. The White Sox did not spend the winter in total rebuild mode like many, MANY teams have done over the past 20 or so years. Cease was right before the season started and now they are clearly rebuilding. OK?

KyleMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  jtrichey

I just think of tanking as reaching the point where losing games is beneficial to your long term outcome (usually this is for draft picks). They’re not trying to lose games so that term, to me, is misapplied.

The White Sox have been rebuilding since last year’s trade deadline. Not sure what we’re arguing about there actually!

airforce21oneMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  Kyle

Tanking is just one form of rebuilding. That’s it.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

I think the biggest reason here is that the two teams identified as potential “superteams” before the season started (Dodgers and Braves) have been totally shelled by injuries. I think we could have predicted the Dodgers were going to have some challenges because the rotation was thin and they had a lot of injury risks there, but not to this extent. And the Braves’ injuries have been way beyond what we would expect of anyone.

If I had to pick a second reason, I would say that the stacked NL West and AL East also plays a role. The schedule is more balanced than in the past but it’s still a factor.

96mncMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The lineup injuries for ATL have definitely been unexpected. Riley is just the icing on the cake. But the rotation issues were predictable. One guy in Fried that previously had TJ and then had had elbow issues last year while only pitching 77 innings. Two guys in Lopez and Sale (who has been fantastic) that only threw 66 and 102 innings last year. A guy in Morton that’s 41 years old. Strider was previous TJ guy that had a 55 inning jump last year. They definitely had a heavy risk rotation heading into the year. Not a single guy that they could realistically expect to post for 180 effective innings.

CousinNicky
2 years ago
Reply to  96mnc

What pitching issues? They are top 5 overall rotation with the best K rate, the overwhelming cy young favorite for 2024, also have a top 5 bullpen with a great closer, not to mention the best rookie starter thats not japanese(yamamoto and imanaga) or named paul skenes.

As for predicting the injuries, fried averaged 30 starts from 19-22(he made 11 starts in 2020*), his first bout of injuries was last season, not sure i would label him a “injury concern”. I will give you Morton, hes old and it shows but is fine for a 4th/5th starter. Lopez and Sale were the worries you hoped to get 250+ innings out of them combined which they will. Strider was concern as much as any other hard throwing pitcher, which is both correct but also generic for every other team.

96mncMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  CousinNicky

Fried previously had TJ so when he had elbow issues again last season huge alarm bells should have gone off.

The buy lows on Sale and Lopez were great scouting but Lopez was hitting the wall before getting hurt. We’ll see how he does going forward but I’m not expecting good things. We’ll see on Sale. I already stated specifically why Strider was a red flag coming into this offseason.

The bullpen has been fantastic and the other Spencer has been great but is also about to start redlining the engine.

Last edited 2 years ago by 96mnc
synco
2 years ago
Reply to  96mnc

Very similar could be said for the Dodgers, unfortunately. Kershaw has only been good for partial seasons for quite a while now. Glasnow is always hurt. Yamamoto (as myself and others noted at the beginning of the season) doesn’t have much follow through in his motion, and was a pretty good bet to get hurt in the max-effort MLB. Nothing needs to be said about Bueller and Paxton. Then a ton of young guys, who have a proclivity to get hurt as they ramp up for the first time.

It’s a bit like the Padres approach for the last few years: collect a bunch of high variance, oft-injured guys and hope 2-3 of them stay healthy.

lacslyer
2 years ago
Reply to  96mnc

I get the point you’re trying to make, but claiming Sale and Lopez’s performance was predictable is laughable. The two have a combined 15 days on the IL and have both at some point led the league in ERA and Sale is the leading NL Cy Young candidate. No one saw that coming from either of them.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s amazing to me that the Dodgers have maintained 1st place with extended absences from multiple HoFers/All Stars; watching them last night against Seattle with a healthy lineup for the first time, I gotta think they’re in better shape going fwd than some of the other contenders with new question marks

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

IDK, Freeman is playing through a messed up finger and the rotation has a ton of injury questions still. Flaherty is great, Stone appears to be a solid #4. But Kershaw just got back from a huge injury and is old, Glasnow has already exceeded his high in innings and is hurt, and Yamamoto is on the 60-day IL.

There’s a lot of variance here depending on who is healthy and not hampered by injuries. They could be ahead of the Yankees / Phillies / Padres / Orioles and I wouldn’t be surprised, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they were behind them for the rest of the season either.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It seems to me that just having lots and lots of injuries increases parity because everyone’s replacements are about as good as each other.

If the top 10 players on the Dodgers and White Sox missed the whole season they’d be a lot closer in quality than if completely healthy. Well maybe not the White Sox

Last edited 2 years ago by Ivan_Grushenko
The Duke
2 years ago

Balanced schedules are the biggest culprit. High numbers of league and divisional games meant better and deeper scouting of said teams. No more

A second issue is the race to the cap that developed over the last couple years which handcuffed a number of teams who bought poorly (and for many years) and thus can’t fix their rosters quickly

This is what Manfred wants, NFL parity, and it’s really not great.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

Why isn’t it great to have more parity? AL had terrible attendance while the Yankees won everything 1921-1964

OnWI1933Member since 2016
2 years ago

Fun article. Personally I am digging the Brewers unexpectedly steamrolling the NL Central.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  OnWI1933

Indeed; how many #narratives insisted that Craig Counsell was the secret sauce of Milwaukee’s success?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

There’s a lot of ideas out there about the importance of managers, but I don’t think there’s any reason to expect the manager to be the secret sauce of any winning team. Occasionally managers will win for you with savvy decisions, like Snitker’s unbelievably good decisions with the Braves in 2021. But the most important thing is that they don’t alienate the team and get everyone to buy into their roles. Murphy and Counsell don’t look to be that different in that respect.

96mncMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Strongly disagree about the importance of the manager. Pitching staff management, specifically how and more importantly when to deploy rps in the 5th to 8th innings determines more games than is given credit for. That’s before taking into consideration how aggressive a team is manufacturing runs and how well they execute situational baseball.

Having said that, Murphy is fantastic at both.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  96mnc

How do we know exactly how much of pitching staff management is the manager and not the GM?

dezreMember since 2020
2 years ago

I don’t know if I saw narratives about Counsell being the secret sauce. I do remember it being a surprise, but mostly because he was a good manager with a rival good club already (with Brewer’s management having extolled his awesomeness to that point).

Spahn_and_Sain
2 years ago
Reply to  dezre

Brewers fans were pushing for Counsell to get Manager of the Year for about 4 or 5 years, and then there was ‘Craigtember’ (though really just a catchphrase, it wasn’t like he changed his management style late-season).
The Brewers had consistently outperformed their run diff for awhile, even through bullpen turnover and SP injuries, so a lot of fans grew to give him outsized credit as he was one of the few consistent pieces.

SenorGato
2 years ago

All part of the NFLization process. Older league, shorter, cheaper careers, salary capped, bonus capped, engineered parity, and no real desire to chase younger fans when the older bases offer much more passive and active support for the economic and financial agendas

jayman4Member since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  SenorGato

Older?

airforce21oneMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  jayman4

He’s adjusting the facts to fit a narrative, not the other way around