FanGraphs 2018 Staff Predictions
And just like that, the winter of our discontent is almost over. Tomorrow, all 30 teams celebrate Opening Day, and their fans with them. But before play begins, we at FanGraphs will observe our annual tradition of attempting to predict what will happen this year, before we commence our other annual tradition of getting some things wrong. Last year was a mixed bag. Astros? Nailed it. Cubs and Dodgers? Aren’t our moms proud! Aaron Judge and Cody Bellinger, Rookie of the Year winners? Can’t say we saw that coming.
We gathered predictions from writers across our family of blogs; what follows are the results.
The American League
The American League predictions are marked by their overwhelming sameness. Of the 40 ballots cast, a full 29 have the Astros, Indians, and Yankees sitting atop their divisions come the season’s end. Eight others feature the Astros and Indians but swap in the Red Sox for the Yankees. That isn’t so surprising: we currently project Houston to win 100 games, while New York, Cleveland, and Boston check in at 95, 94, and 93 wins, respectively.
And while the staff and the projections expect the first Wild Card spot to fall to either the Yankees or the Red Sox, there is a bit more wiggle room in the second Wild Card. The Angels receive more total Wild Card and playoff votes and take the prize here, but the Twins aren’t far behind. We might call it the Hey, They Still Have Mike Trout Effect if we enjoyed naming things.
One place the staff diverges sharply from projections? The Blue Jays. Much like our readers, we don’t think much of Toronto’s current 86-win projection, or the second Wild Card spot that goes with it.
And we don’t have much faith in the teams in the middle to surprise either. The Mariners and A’s are projected to win 80 games a piece this year, with the Rangers pegged at 79, and the Orioles and Rays each thought good for 78 wins. Those are all flawed squads — if they were less flawed they’d be expected to win more games! — but they managed just five total votes between them.
| Team | Division | Wild Card 1 | Wild Card 2 | Playoffs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York | 31 | 8 | 0 | 39 |
| Boston | 9 | 21 | 3 | 33 |
| Toronto | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Baltimore | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tampa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team | Division | Wild Card 1 | Wild Card 2 | Playoffs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland | 37 | 0 | 0 | 37 |
| Minnesota | 3 | 1 | 14 | 18 |
| Chicago | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Detroit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kansas City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team | Division | Wild Card 1 | Wild Card 2 | Playoffs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston | 38 | 1 | 1 | 40 |
| Los Angeles | 2 | 7 | 14 | 23 |
| Oakland | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Seattle | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Texas | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The National League
The National League vote leans similarly toward consensus. Indeed, 28 of the ballots cast have the Dodgers, Cubs, and Nationals winning their divisions. The Nationals appear as a playoff team on every ballot, in one form or another. The Dodgers receive 39 playoff votes. We’re attributing Roger Cormier’s decision to purposely pick against favorites — and thus exclude LA entirely — to be the result of cultivated eccentricity or perhaps an extreme view of Justin Turner’s importance.
A bit more excitement comes in the Wild Cards. Last year’s Wild Card loser, the Colorado Rockies, is expected to miss the postseason entirely. The staff likes the Cardinals a lot and expects the Diamondbacks to return. And almost half the staff expects the Brewers to outperform their modest 79-win projection and make the playoffs, though opinions vary on exactly which spot they’ll occupy. They’re tied with the Diamondbacks in total playoff votes.
The Phillies aren’t expected to be a Wild Card team or challenge for the division, but the eight Wild Card votes they receive here represents a step up from the one (out of 55) they received last year. On the flip side, the staff is unmoved by the prospect of healthy pitching or Adrian Gonzalez, and gives the Mets just four playoff votes. They received 40 last year.
| Team | Division | Wild Card 1 | Wild Card 2 | Playoffs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington | 39 | 1 | 0 | 40 |
| New York | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Philadelphia | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Atlanta | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Miami | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team | Division | Wild Card 1 | Wild Card 2 | Playoffs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago | 29 | 6 | 1 | 36 |
| St. Louis | 4 | 17 | 4 | 25 |
| Milwaukee | 7 | 7 | 5 | 19 |
| Pittsburgh | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Cincinnati | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team | Division | Wild Card 1 | Wild Card 2 | Playoffs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles | 38 | 1 | 0 | 39 |
| Arizona | 1 | 5 | 13 | 19 |
| Colorado | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| San Diego | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| San Francisco | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Individual Awards
Carlos Correa is very good, and Jose Altuve just won, and the reigning NL MVP is now lurking in the AL. But the thing about Mike Trout is that one injury-shortened season (in which he still managed a very nice 6.9 WAR) is not enough to dissuade people that he’s the best player in baseball.
| Player | Votes |
|---|---|
| Mike Trout | 22 |
| Giancarlo Stanton | 6 |
| Carlos Correa | 4 |
| Jose Altuve | 3 |
| Mookie Betts | 2 |
| J.D. Martinez | 1 |
| Aaron Judge | 1 |
| Francisco Lindor | 1 |
Last year, Chris Sale narrowly edged out Corey Kluber in these predictions. Kluber won. This year, Chris Sale narrowly edges out Corey Kluber in these predictions. Will Kluber win again? We’ll find out!
| Player | Votes |
|---|---|
| Chris Sale | 15 |
| Corey Kluber | 12 |
| Luis Severino | 3 |
| Justin Verlander | 3 |
| Chris Archer | 2 |
| Gerrit Cole | 2 |
| Trevor Bauer | 1 |
| Carlos Carrasco | 1 |
| Lance McCullers | 1 |
We’re putting our faith in the idea that Shohei Ohtani’s rough spring doesn’t matter too much — which, for a guy who is adjusting to a new league and a new ball, seems like a good bet. Then again, last year, Andrew Benintendi was our overwhelming favorite. Isn’t it nice that we can still be surprised by things?
| Player | Votes |
|---|---|
| Shohei Ohtani | 22 |
| Willie Calhoun | 5 |
| Miguel Andujar | 3 |
| Gleyber Torres | 3 |
| Eloy Jimenez | 3 |
| Michael Kopech | 2 |
| Franklin Barreto | 1 |
| Austin Hays | 1 |
MVP isn’t as settled in the NL as we believe it to be in the AL, though the idea of a soon-to-hit-free-agency Bryce Harper proved alluring to many. Paul Goldschmidt always seems like he should do better in these sorts of things. The idea of Marlins fans having to watch Christian Yelich turn in an MVP performance the season immediately after Giancarlo Stanton did — while both of them wear other people’s laundry — feels deeply unkind.
| Player | Votes |
|---|---|
| Bryce Harper | 13 |
| Kris Bryant | 6 |
| Nolan Arenado | 4 |
| Corey Seager | 4 |
| Freddie Freeman | 3 |
| Paul Goldschmidt | 3 |
| Joey Votto | 3 |
| Anthony Rendon | 2 |
| Tommy Pham | 1 |
| Christian Yelich | 1 |
I chose Max Scherzer because I know what it is like to have your whole day ruined by your back hurting just a little, and I mostly get to sit down. So Clayton Kershaw’s 2017 makes me nervous. The majority of my colleagues think Kershaw will make me look silly.
| Players | Votes |
|---|---|
| Clayton Kershaw | 20 |
| Max Scherzer | 8 |
| Noah Syndergaard | 3 |
| Jacob deGrom | 2 |
| Aaron Nola | 2 |
| Jose Quintana | 2 |
| Yu Darvish | 1 |
| Stephen Strasburg | 1 |
| Luke Weaver | 1 |
We like Ronald Acuña a lot, service time tomfoolery be damned. Really, damned. Damn it to hell.
| Players | Votes |
|---|---|
| Ronald Acuña | 27 |
| Lewis Brinson | 3 |
| Scott Kingery | 3 |
| Victor Robles | 3 |
| J.P. Crawford | 1 |
| Ryan McMahon | 1 |
| Alex Reyes | 1 |
| Nick Senzel | 1 |
So that’s it, that’s the whole season. We look forward to being proven right and wrong, and writing about how and why. We hope you’ll tag along for the ride. Happy baseball!
| Author | East | Central | West | WC 1 | WC 2 | MVP | Cy Young | RoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al Melchior | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | MIN | Trout | Sale | Torres |
| Alec Denton | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | LAA | Stanton | Verlander | Torres |
| Alex Chamberlain | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | LAA | Correa | Archer | Calhoun |
| Andrew Perpetua | NYY | CLE | HOU | LAA | BOS | Altuve | Severino | Ohtani |
| Ben Kaspick | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | LAA | Correa | McCullers | Ohtani |
| Ben Pasinkoff | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | LAA | Trout | Kluber | Ohtani |
| Birchwood Brothers | NYY | CLE | HOU | SEA | BOS | Betts | Cole | Kopech |
| Brad Johnson | NYY | CLE | HOU | SEA | TOR | Judge | Sale | Hays |
| Brandon Warne | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | MIN | Trout | Kluber | Ohtani |
| Brice Russ | BOS | CLE | HOU | NYY | LAA | Trout | Sale | Ohtani |
| Carson Cistulli | NYY | CLE | HOU | LAA | TOR | Trout | Carrasco | Calhoun |
| Craig Edwards | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | LAA | Trout | Kluber | Ohtani |
| David Laurila | BOS | CLE | HOU | NYY | MIN | Trout | Bauer | Barreto |
| Dustin Nosler | NYY | CLE | HOU | LAA | MIN | Trout | Severino | Jimenez |
| Eli Ben-Porat | BOS | CLE | HOU | NYY | LAA | Trout | Kluber | Andujar |
| Eric Longenhagen | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | MIN | Lindor | Cole | Ohtani |
| Jay Jaffe | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | MIN | Stanton | Severino | Ohtani |
| Jeff Sullivan | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | OAK | Altuve | Sale | Ohtani |
| Jeff Zimmerman | BOS | CLE | HOU | NYY | MIN | Stanton | Sale | Torres |
| Jon Roegele | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | TOR | Altuve | Sale | Ohtani |
| Josh Shepardson | BOS | CLE | HOU | NYY | LAA | J.D. Martinez | Kluber | Kopech |
| Justin Mason | BOS | CLE | HOU | NYY | LAA | Trout | Sale | Ohtani |
| Justin Vibber | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | TOR | Stanton | Sale | Jimenez |
| Kiley McDaniel | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | LAA | Trout | Kluber | Andujar |
| Meg Rowley | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | LAA | Trout | Sale | Ohtani |
| Mike Podhorzer | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | LAA | Trout | Sale | Ohtani |
| Neil Weinberg | NYY | CLE | HOU | LAA | BOS | Trout | Kluber | Ohtani |
| Nick Pollack | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | MIN | Trout | Sale | Ohtani |
| Paul Sporer | NYY | MIN | HOU | LAA | OAK | Correa | Verlander | Jimenez |
| Rian Watt | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | MIN | Trout | Sale | Ohtani |
| Roger Cormier | BOS | MIN | LAA | NYY | HOU | Trout | Verlander | Calhoun |
| Ryan Pollack | BOS | CLE | HOU | LAA | OAK | Trout | Sale | Andujar |
| Scott Spratt | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | MIN | Trout | Archer | Ohtani |
| Scott Strandberg | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | MIN | Stanton | Kluber | Ohtani |
| Sean Dolinar | NYY | MIN | LAA | HOU | TOR | Trout | Sale | Ohtani |
| Shane Tourtellotte | BOS | CLE | HOU | NYY | MIN | Correa | Sale | Calhoun |
| Sheryl Ring | NYY | CLE | HOU | MIN | LAA | Stanton | Kluber | Ohtani |
| Stephen Loftus | NYY | CLE | HOU | LAA | MIN | Trout | Kluber | Ohtani |
| Travis Sawchik | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | MIN | Trout | Kluber | Ohtani |
| Trey Baughn | NYY | CLE | HOU | BOS | LAA | Betts | Kluber | Calhoun |
| Author | East | Central | West | WC 1 | WC 2 | MVP | Cy Young | RoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al Melchior | WAS | CHC | LAD | MIL | STL | Harper | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Alec Denton | WAS | CHC | LAD | MIL | PHI | Freeman | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Alex Chamberlain | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | PHI | Arenado | Syndergaard | Brinson |
| Andrew Perpetua | WAS | MIL | LAD | CHC | ARI | Freeman | Scherzer | Reyes |
| Ben Kaspick | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | ARI | Goldschmidt | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Ben Pasinkoff | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | MIL | Bryant | Syndergaard | McMahon |
| Birchwood Brothers | WAS | STL | LAD | ARI | MIL | Arenado | Weaver | Acuña |
| Brad Johnson | WAS | STL | LAD | CHC | PHI | Pham | Darvish | Acuña |
| Brandon Warne | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | ARI | Harper | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Brice Russ | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | NYM | Bryant | Scherzer | Acuña |
| Carson Cistulli | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | PHI | Rendon | Scherzer | Crawford |
| Craig Edwards | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | SF | Seager | Kershaw | Acuña |
| David Laurila | WAS | CHC | COL | LAD | MIL | Arenado | Nola | Robles |
| Dustin Nosler | WAS | CHC | LAD | MIL | PHI | Goldschmidt | Quintana | Kingery |
| Eli Ben-Porat | WAS | STL | LAD | CHC | PHI | Harper | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Eric Longenhagen | WAS | MIL | LAD | ARI | PIT | Rendon | Scherzer | Robles |
| Jay Jaffe | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | ARI | Seager | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Jeff Sullivan | WAS | CHC | LAD | NYM | STL | Bryant | Syndergaard | Acuña |
| Jeff Zimmerman | WAS | CHC | LAD | MIL | ARI | Harper | Kershaw | Robles |
| Jon Roegele | WAS | CHC | LAD | MIL | ARI | Harper | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Josh Shepardson | WAS | MIL | LAD | CHC | SF | Yelich | Scherzer | Acuña |
| Justin Mason | WAS | CHC | LAD | MIL | SF | Harper | Kershaw | Kingery |
| Justin Vibber | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | ARI | Bryant | Scherzer | Acuña |
| Kiley McDaniel | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | MIL | Harper | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Meg Rowley | WAS | CHC | LAD | ARI | STL | Bryant | Scherzer | Acuña |
| Mike Podhorzer | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | ARI | Harper | Kershaw | Acuna |
| Neil Weinberg | WAS | CHC | LAD | MIL | COL | Goldschmidt | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Nick Pollack | WAS | MIL | LAD | CHC | ARI | Votto | Kershaw | Brinson |
| Paul Sporer | WAS | STL | LAD | COL | PHI | Arenado | deGrom | Kingery |
| Rian Watt | WAS | CHC | LAD | ARI | STL | Votto | Quintana | Brinson |
| Roger Cormier | NYM | MIL | ARI | WAS | CHC | Votto | deGrom | Acuña |
| Ryan Pollack | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | MIL | Seager | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Scott Spratt | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | ARI | Harper | Strasburg | Acuña |
| Scott Strandberg | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | NYM | Bryant | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Sean Dolinar | WAS | MIL | LAD | PIT | ARI | Harper | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Shane Tourtellotte | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | ARI | Seager | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Sheryl Ring | WAS | MIL | LAD | CHC | PHI | Harper | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Stephen Loftus | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | ARI | Harper | Kershaw | Acuña |
| Travis Sawchik | WAS | CHC | LAD | STL | COL | Harper | Scherzer | Acuna |
| Trey Baughn | WAS | CHC | LAD | ARI | SF | Freeman | Nola | Senzel |
Meg is the editor-in-chief of FanGraphs and the co-host of Effectively Wild. Prior to joining FanGraphs, her work appeared at Baseball Prospectus, Lookout Landing, and Just A Bit Outside. You can follow her on Bluesky @megrowler.fangraphs.com.
Looking at the rest of his flamboyant ballot, I’m really wondering why Roger Cormier still voted for Trout and Acuña.
He is a delightful mystery.
That must have been an accident.
Um, it’s Mike Trout. The question isn’t why did Roger Cormier vote for him. The question is why did 18 people NOT vote for Trout??? 🙂 🙂 🙂
Both people who voted for Houston to lose also voted for Cleveland to do the same. Seems something less than sincere.
I can’t explain away the NL, but he did put the Angels (who happen to possess Trout) as the division winner. Why, I have no idea, but that explains the MVP vote.
I think the most interesting thing about his ballot is that he’s betting on the Angels to win the division over the Astros, but on Ohtani (who presumably would play an enormous role in the Angels’ success if they do something that improbable) to not even be good enough to win ROY.
Cleveland either wins the division or stays home entirely? On 3 ballots, Cleveland doesn’t even make the playoffs…
The idea seems to be that so many things have to go wrong for Cleveland not to win that it would leave them hopelessly out of contention.
Suggestion for next year: predict which team will be getting the #1 draft pick.
(I’ll take the Tigers in an upset.)
I like this suggestion very much, and will try to remember a year from now.
#1 pick seems way too easy this year with the Marlins.
Try this: Cabrera gets hurt early, Fulmer and Catellanos move in july.
Tigers might make a race of it.
Marlins may be lucky to win 50 games though. Marlins play AL East in interleague play.
The problem with picking the Tigers is they have too many average-to-mediocre players. Castellanos, Iglesias, McCann, Mahtook, and their army of 1-1.5 fWAR starting pitchers aren’t going to command much, so there is a good chance they will stick around. Candelario is the future and Cabrera is unmoveable. And they also play in the same division as the White Sox and Royals.
On the other hand, the Marlins are not only projected for 6 fewer fWAR than the Tigers and play in a division with several acceptably bad teams.
Maybe Realmuto or Fulmer gets traded but right now it sure looks like the Marlins are the leader.
I’m missing an in-joke on Luke Weaver, right?
You mean the 24 year old with a sub-3 xFIP last year who just finished spring with an ERA around 0.5? Not sure why it would take an in-joke to predict him to have a very strong year.
I was gonna post something about the Weaver choice, too. I think he’s really good and insanely valuable (just another player who adds tens of millions of dollars in surplus value for STL for years to come), but I’d take Carlos Martinez over Weaver in a prediction game. Not that I think either pitcher has a good shot at the NL CY, but if you’re gonna pick a St. Louis starter, why not pick Martinez, who has been one rung away from ace for a couple of years now?
If I had to guess, I think you already touched on why: Martinez has been a rung away from an ace for a couple of years now. I’m not going to go back up and find who chose Weaver, but I assume that his or her thought process was that while Martinez likely has a much higher mean and median projection than Weaver, Weaver has a higher ceiling, or more accurately we don’t know yet what his ceiling is and he has shown signs that it might be very high. With that thinking, it’s easy to prefer to have Martinez on your team while still thinking Weaver is more likely to win the Cy Young Award.
Not really – it’s easy to fall for the trap of getting too cute with these predictions, because the obvious picks are too obvious.
So I think that the Brewers are likely going to be a strong contender for a wild card spot, but I’m pretty baffled that seven people are picking them to win the division over the Cubs and the Cardinals. One of those is easy to explain (Roger Cormier). But for the rest, I don’t get it. This is why:
For the Brewers to win, they have to (a) overperform by 16 (sixteen!) games if the Cubs perform as expected, or (b) the Brewers have to overperform by 8 games or so and the Cubs have to underperform by 8 games and the Cardinals can’t by more than a couple games either.
I’m personally willing to argue the Brewers overperforming by 8 games or so, but overperforming by 8 games and the Cubs underperforming by 8 games and the Cardinals not overperforming? I don’t like the chances of all three of those things happening.
In contrast, for the Mets or Twins to win their division, all they need is a 3-4 game overperformance and the favorite to collapse. That road isn’t available for the Brewers since two teams would need to go.
I think you can get there by talking yourself into the pitching staff being a big problem (ex: Lester’s 2017 is his new normal, FIP is going to catch up to Hendricks, Morrow can’t take the workload), plus everything going right for the Brewers. But that pretty much requires a perfect storm, which is why it’s possible, but not probable enough that *predicting* it is anything but a little silly.
There was so much goodwill about the Brewers trading for a few wins in the OF but then they never dealt their surplus – and failed to pounce on the available SP that could have transformed them into legit contenders. Seems like a pretty half-assed off season in terms of 2018 results.
The Cy Young races to me will be fun to watch again. Will Sale actually put together a whole season for once- and not fade the last third of the season? Will Kershaw’s body hold up again?
I would like some of what Roger Cormier is smoking.
Great stuff!
Alas, don’t despair zero-vote teams! The Twins came up empty last year and they made the playoffs as the second wild card!
Being this predictable is a sad state for the game to be in.
And for whatever other tinkering Manfred is doing shaving precious seconds off of game durations, this lack of competitiveness is the thing that is going to drive people away from the game. He’s clearly getting lost in the weeds. Wake up Rob!
I fail to see why this is being downvoted. Predictable = subpar entertainment. Union should be making this argument all day long, every day.
The fact that their predictions are so similar is a reflection of groupthink and cognitive biases like the bandwagon effect more than the actual quality of the teams.
I’m aware that I’ll get downvotes for this, but their own research on projection systems show how inaccurate they are. They’re usually off by 7+ wins IIRC, yet the top teams in the projections are all treated as inevitable here.
Even last year, which was a remarkably good year for the projections in terms of projection division winners, the projections still completely whiffed on teams like the Mets, Giants, DBacks, Yankees, Blue Jays, Rockies, and Brewers.
It is not group think as much as imposing a discrete decision on a probability. There may be writers who think the Astros are a lock and others who think they are just ahead of the Angels, but they both pick the Astros to win the division.
While the projections my be inaccurate, that doesn’t mean that it is better to not go with them. Someone may have looked for a surprise wild card contender in the NL and picked the Reds and Braves instead of the Rockies and Brewers.
If you give me a fair 20 sided die and 40 experts on probability, then ask, if I roll this die, which is more likely to come up, a two digit number or a one digit number and have something significant riding on getting it right, then I’ll get 40 votes for “two digit”, even though that’s only a 55% chance. I’ll get 0 votes for “one digit”, even though that’s a 45% chance.
If the vote distribution followed the probability distribution it would be 22 to 18 in my hypothetical example, but it won’t be, it will be roughly 40 minus a few careless errors or people who don’t take it seriously (hence I need something significant riding on it to expect 40-0).
There’s no particular reason the vote distribution should look anything like the probability distribution.
The difference is that you’re assuming that the favored teams via the projection systems are actually better. I think that’s far from clear.
To give a few examples, I really do think the Cardinals are better than the Cubs. I think the DBacks have a good chance at the Dodgers, especially with Turner hurt. The Mets could easily wind up being very very good with a healthy rotation. Yet the writers instead coalesce around a few teams that the projections like. We’ll see.
@Doug Lampert – very similar to the Rotten Tomatoes effect.
(If 100 critics think a movie is “ok” it will have a 100% score even if none of them actually think it was a particularly good movie. If 85 of those hundred think the movie is a masterpiece, but 15 think it’s not good, the movie ends up with an 85%. Fans then argue about how movie 1 can have a higher score when movie 2 was clearly better.)
There’s also the lack of a defined reward system, which leaves the writers’ decisions with few consequences. Most people are going to be closer to consensus on an issue that they have no reason to take seriously.
Props to Roger for going the other direction anyway.
Surprising how few of the staff are siding with the site’s own projections for 3 playoff teams coming out of the AL East.
I don’t have the numbers on me, but it’s logically very difficult to have three teams from the same division get to the post-season (with two as wild cards, obviously). The two that don’t win the division still have to play 19 games against both each other and against the division winner.
That works in some divisions, where the teams are a bit closer. But the AL-E is the 800 lb gorilla in the corner. It can obviously happen, but it’s an uphill challenge.
Both WCs came out of the same division for the NL in 2013, 2015 and 2017 and in 2016 for the AL. So teams from the same division have filled both WC slots in 4 of the 10 possible instances.
It’s actually 6 seasons that the 2 wild card system has been in place. So only 4 of 12 instances, including 1 in 6 in the AL.
Gee look, Fangraphs is relatively bearish on the Cubs again…
Guessing the 4 SF ballots were turned in before Madbum’s injury?
Superteams, superplayers… make for boring predictions.
Roger Cormier, you beautiful bastard.
I like that you don’t do World Series or playoff predictions. It says a lot.
That’s tomorrow.
I’m surprised so many people are taking the Twins over the Jays for the second WC spot, both here and in the community post. I know the Jays have a tougher schedule/division but I’m not seeing the Twins having a better record even accounting for that.
A healthy Sanchez and Marco Estrada not having to worry about a trade deadline deal and being able to sleep properly (which screwed up 6-8 weeks of his 2017 season) makes the rotation pretty deep. I get the conservative projections, but there is a lot of upside there. And unlike in past years they have competent depth guys in the event someone is hurt.
Tulo is not coming close to that projection, but at least they have serviceable replacements for him, and in the event Travis is hurt. Travis is tough to project but even the PA would be a career high so I wouldn’t count on it.
If Granderson struggles or Morales has another poor 2-3 months they have Teoscar Hernandez and Alford as potential replacements. I don’t trust Morales at all but if he’s struggling he’s not making it through the All Star break if they’re in a playoff race. And they can potentially use Pearce in the DH spot as well, which would keep him healthy and out of the OF where he’s a disaster defensively. And for all of Grichuk’s flaws, he’s still a quality defender with a league average bat. And unlike last year they have depth in case guys get injured or don’t produce.
I’m just not seeing where the Twins are better. It’s definitely not in the rotation, it’s not in the bullpen. Is there an advantage for the position players? I don’t think so. Even with the tougher schedule I still think the Jays end the season with a better record.
The Jays might be a better team, but the three non-contenders in the AL Central are awful. That’s a major advantage c
Oh, they’re absolutely terrible for the non-contenders in the Central, no question. But that was what I was getting at – even accounting for that, I disagree the Twins will have a better record. Clearly, others feel that’s enough to get them into the second WC (combined with the tougher AL East schedule making it more challenging for the Jays). I’m just saying I don’t think that’s necessarily going to be the case. Essentially I see the projections being more accurate and was surprised by the results both here and by the community.
To follow up on sbrtooth’s point: If you exclude the Blue Jays and Twins, here are the projected fWAR totals for each team on Depth Charts:
AL East
Yankees: 51.2
Red Sox: 48
Orioles: 32.2
Rays: 31.9
AL Central
Indians: 49.5
Tigers: 22.6
Royals: 22.3
White Sox: 19.5
For fun, start adding up the fWARs of the “bottom-dwellers” between divisions. The Tigers, Royals, and White Sox put together are about the same as the Orioles and the Rays.
One thing that’ll make up for that some- interleague play
AL East plays NL East-
Nationals 44.5
Mets 39.1
Phillies 32.9
Braves 27.6
Marlins 16.4
AL Central plays NL Central-
Cubs 49.9
Cards 40.9
Brewers 33.5
Pirates 31.9
Reds 27.8
Blue Jays get 6 vs Phillies, 4 each vs Mets and Braves, and 3 vs Nationals and Marlins.
Twins get 6 vs Brewers, 4 each vs Pirates and Cardinals, and 3 vs Cubs, Reds.
average projected WAR for Toronto’s interleague games 32.35
average projected WAR for Twins interleague games 36.27
think part of that will be which of the Phillies or Brewers pop this year.
Fwiw, a follow-up piece with a few comments by each writer on the notable “outliers” (eg, Ryan Pollack having NYY miss the postseason, David Laurila’s pick of Bauer for AL CYA) would be terrific!
How about one where Cistulli puts Roger Cormier on trial for heresy?
Two people picked the Angels to win the AL West? Perhaps Shohei Ohtani deserves the nickname of The Shadow, the One who has the Power To Cloud Men’s Minds.
what the heck Roger
Why was Max Scherzer not picked by anyone last year?
He had a finger injury in spring training & missed the 1st week or so of the year. While obviously not a lot of time, I am sure the uncertainty of how he would recover, along with Kershaw being healthy during the spring made it easy to not vote for Scherzer.
AL MVP: George Springer
NL MVP: Trea Turner
Another season ,another great year for baseball.
Makes no sense for Cormier to pick the Angels to win the AL West but then Verlander to win the CY. I know it’s possible, but if Verlander is that good, Astros win the division by 20 games. Did he fill out his ballot blindfolded?
Unless the Angels rotation is also good. It’s not nonsensical, but it is unlikely.
Boring. Just about everyone picked the best teams to win (not that I fault them).
My two cents: this would work much better as a contest where writers are penalized for bad picks. Right not you seem to get bragging rights “see, I told you the Brewers would win the Central” while setting aside that you missed 4 divisions. For me, it would be great to see everyone pick win totals. So not only would you (in theory) be wrong about the Twins but you’d be 20 games off on the Twins and Indians win totals.