FanGraphs Audio: Jeff Sullivan vs. All Baseball

by
October 2, 2012

Episode 253
FanGraphs author and proprietor of Mariners SB Nation blog Lookout Landing Jeff Sullivan fights baseball with his words.

Don’t hesitate to direct pod-related correspondence to @cistulli on Twitter.

You can subscribe to the podcast via iTunes or other feeder things.

Audio after the jump. (Approximately 54 min. play time.)

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: RSS





 

Carson Cistulli has published a book of aphorisms called Spirited Ejaculations of a New Enthusiast.

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bipmember
11 years ago

It is not a balk if the pitcher steps off the rubber and fakes the throw. Once a pitcher has stepped off the rubber as his first move, he basically can do anything he wants, and the runner may as well go back to the bag since as long as the pitcher is off the rubber, no pitch can occur and so there’s no point in taking a lead. It is only when the pitcher steps towards the base with his foot still on the rubber that he is required to throw.

That comment Jeff made about the banality of the majority of what we watch and the ensuing conversation just made me aware that I derive some pleasure out of the arbitrary complexity of the balk rule. I think that’s why I like baseball more than any other sport. I think in most other sports, there’s action and there’s the nothingness between the action. In baseball, there’s action, albeit less frequently than in other sports, but then there is beautiful and complex inaction, where nothing is moving and yet there’s so much going on. Baseball is like an iceberg; 90% of the action goes on under the surface.

0
joser
11 years ago
Reply to  Bip

I agree. Back when I used to argue with people who said “baseball is boring” I’d always respond “You think that because you don’t understand pitching.” Pitch sequencing, the capabilities of the batter at the plate vs the repertoire of the pitcher, the game state (bases occupied and outs recorded) all are feeding into what the pitcher is about to do, and what the batter might (or might not) think the pitcher is about to do, and if you’re paying attention the whole thing can be pretty riveting. But only if you have some idea about that kind of thing, because otherwise it just looks like two guys standing there waiting for something to happen.

0
joser
11 years ago
Reply to  joser

That said, as someone who followed the M’s from their birth through the 80s, missed out on the 90s, and only returned for the 21st century: some baseball, particularly that played by bad teams late in the season, just defies interest.

But I think Jeff’s “inverse relationship between team success and blog quality” is really just another example of the Anna Karenina Principle

0