FanGraphs Chat – 1/8/14
11:47 |
: With the holidays behind us, I’m back to chat for the first time in a few weeks. Obviously, the Hall of Fame is taking center stage today, but non-HOF (non-fantasy) questions are fair game too.
|
11:47 |
|
12:08 |
: Sorry for the late start, had to finish a piece on the greatness of Greg Maddux. Man, he was amazing.
|
12:09 |
Is there any precedent at all for a HOF voter to lose his voting privileges other than death or voluntarily giving them up? |
12:10 |
: I don’t think so. Bill Conlin, who was forcibly retired after being accused by multiple relatives of child molestation, is still a BBWAA member in good standing and has a HOF vote. They’ll almost certainly kick the person out of the organization who sold their vote to Deadspin, but Conlin will keep on voting as long as he wants.
|
12:11 |
Stat question here: Is BABIP affected by the ballpark you’re playing in? Is there somewhere we can look up the BABIP of a ballpark? Or perhaps it would be more accurate to look up the effect +/- a given ballpark has on a player’s BABIP? Though the latter would be hard to split apart from the quality of the home team’s defense. Still, it makes sense–if a ballpark is larger, you should be able to hit for a bigger BABIP in said ballpark, no? |
12:12 |
: Yes, ballpark absolutely has an effect on BABIP. Coors inflates average BABIP to around .325, by far the biggest impact of any park. Parks with big foul territories deflate BABIP, since more pop-ups get caught rather than land in the seats.
|
12:13 |
Given the deals that have been signed this offseason, does the Hunter Pence deal look a lot better today then it did a few months ago? |
12:13 |
: No, still looks bad.
|
12:13 |
: The Choo deal is just worse.
|
12:13 |
How much would have to go right for the Padres to make the playoffs out of the NL West? |
12:13 |
: Josh Johnson has to go back to being JOSH JOHNSON, and then they need a big rebound season from Chase Headley.
|
12:14 |
The Jays 2B hole was listed by Jeff the other day as one of the biggest holes on any contender. Since it seems the Jays want to earmark their money to pitching, Nick Franklin jumps out as an obvious solution. What’s a fair package from the Jays? |
12:14 |
: There’s not an obvious fit. The Mariners need good outfielders, but the Blue Jays don’t have any to spare, really.
|
12:15 |
I asked Jeff something similar to this yesterday, but do you think the $/WAR would be vary much if you broke it down by position? |
12:15 |
: Matt Swartz wrote about this for us a few years back. Yes, 1B/RPs get paid a lot more than 2Bs.
|
12:15 |
Does the HOF ever sever ties with the BBWAA and come up with a new panel of voters (perhaps including some writers) or is that bond too strong? |
12:15 |
: I think the HOF believes that the process is working wonderfully.
|
12:16 |
Why is Jeff Bagwell guilty in the eyes of BWAA for PED use when he has never appeared on any documents or reports? |
12:16 |
: Because he didn’t hit homers in the minors and he did in the majors. It’s guilt by association, basically.
|
12:17 |
Are there any plans to account for pitchers who are clearly better than their WAR and FIP relate? If WAR is meant to be as close to a catch-all stat as possible, it seems like it needs to at least try to account for the “Weaver-Glavine Problem.” |
12:17 |
: If you think pitchers are best evaluated by runs allowed, use RA9-WAR, which we already have on the site.
|
12:17 |
Predict the landing spots for the following: Garza, E. Santana, Jimenez |
12:18 |
: Anaheim, Seattle, Toronto.
|
12:18 |
Which team is poised to take a big step backwards in 2014? |
12:18 |
: The Reds.
|
12:18 |
Do you think MLB will ever see/stop ignoring the hypcrosity tat exists between the older Cuban players and soon Tanaka and American born drafted players? Players like Strasburg and Harper are making less than Guerrero will make for the Dodgers. |
12:19 |
: They don’t care about consistency as much as they care about keeping costs down.
|
12:19 |
Can you share your thoughts on the Gurnick vote? Is this a matter of “why waste time griping about one idiot when it’s the system that should be the target or our ire”? |
12:20 |
: I think that, if your stance is that the baseball hall of fame should ignore 20 years of baseball history, you probably shouldn’t be voting. I’m glad he’s surrendering his ballot next year.
|
12:20 |
Colby Rasmus for Homer Bailey? |
12:20 |
: Bailey’s better, so no.
|
12:20 |
What is your opinion one the floor and ceiling for a guy like Kole Calhoun? Household name by the end of the year? |
12:21 |
: Looks like a nice average player to me.
|
12:21 |
think the Reds are lurking? They’ve been way too quiet this winter. Could they swoop in and sign Garza for example? Maybe back that up with a Bailey swap for a CFer? Rasmus? DeAza? |
12:21 |
: Trading Bailey for de Aza would be an atrocious move, and if they can’t afford Bronson Arroyo, they can’t afford Matt Garza.
|
12:22 |
Surprised Billy Beane hasn’t jumped ship to an opportunity that might allow him more $ to spend? |
12:22 |
: I think he likes the challenge.
|
12:23 |
Would Tanaka put the Mariners into a range of “just enough wild card hope that there’s a reason to watch?” |
12:23 |
: Sure. And all it would have cost them was $400 million…
|
12:23 |
Thanks for chatting, Dave. Maybe it was just a lack of other significant news yesterday, but I feel like the vitriol for Tom Gurnick was a little excessive, with most of it aimed too much at him specifically rather than the system that allows one to do such things (though I do agree that what Jurnick did was very silly and inconsistent with even his own line of thinking). What are your thoughts? |
12:24 |
: I try to stay away from attacking individuals, and prefer to focus on the quality of the argument that they’re making. I wish more people would do the same.
|
12:24 |
Why is Stanton off to a “good start” to Cooperstown while Heyward goes unmentioned? Your own site says Heyward has been the better player and they’re the same age; at some point don’t you have to have a little humility about your ability to forecast different future results? |
12:25 |
: Maybe it’s not the national guy who has no reason to be biased towards Stanton over Heyward that has the humility problem, but the irrational Braves fan who throws a fit every time FanGraphs doesn’t worship his favorite team?
|
12:26 |
Predictions for Bonds’ and Clemens’ percentages? Both were around 35% last year. |
12:26 |
: Lower.
|
12:26 |
Do you think the current Stephen Drew situation proves that even successful “pillow contracts” are not all that effective in driving up the price next year? Drew had a nice “bounceback” year, but it seems like teams don’t project him as a significantly better player than they did 12 months ago… |
12:26 |
: I think they definitely do, but this time around, he has the disadvantage of having draft pick compensation attached. It’s the problem with having a good “pillow contract” season; there’s a tax applied that can sink your value.
|
12:27 |
what do you ultimately see happening with Price? it doesn’t seem like the yield will be what was initially thought. |
12:27 |
: I think teams will make another run at him after Tanaka signs. No reason to give up the farm if you can just buy another farm for cash.
|
12:27 |
Biggest name to get less than 5% and fall off? |
12:27 |
: Palmeiro.
|
12:28 |
Sub-.500 team in ’13 most likely to make the playoffs in ’14? |
12:28 |
: Angels.
|
12:28 |
What time do we expect to hear official HOF results? Or will they just bleed in like political election restults? |
12:28 |
: Announcement is at 2 pm eastern.
|
12:28 |
Make a case for Hall of Famer Armando Benitez. |
12:29 |
: The Hall of Fame is now for any player who had a pulse.
|
12:29 |
: Welcome, Mr. Benitez, and everyone else ever.
|
12:29 |
Maddux is the second best pitcher available for enshrinement into the HOF on this year’s ballot.. Rocket is still the best pitcher of this, and perhaps, any generation of baseball.. comment? |
12:29 |
: Disagree.
|
12:29 |
Can you tell me how to calculate fWAR for pitchers? Or could you point me in the direction of the formula? |
12:29 |
: It’s in the glossary. Upper right hand corner on the home page.
|
12:30 |
Will we ever see another pitcher like Smoltz? Dominant SP to dominant closer back to dominant SP? |
12:30 |
: I could see a guy like Lincecum potentially having that career path.
|
12:31 |
Looking at the all-time great hitters, there is a clear bias towards LHH. Seems weird that the two best hitters currently(Cabrera, Trout) are both RHH. Trying to think of similar RHH duos to be the best |
12:31 |
: Frank Thomas and Manny Ramirez?
|
12:31 |
: Maybe not best in baseball, because Bonds, but best in AL?
|
12:31 |
Was it because of PEDs that you don’t care about the NFL, and if so does that conflict at all with your stance on the baseball issue? Also, will you watch the Superbowl if the Seahawks are in it? |
12:32 |
: I stopped watching the NFL (and most other sports) once baseball became my job, because I feel an obligation to be as good at my job as possible and also not spend my entire life ignoring friends and family. So all my extra sports time just got funneled into baseball. I’ll watch the Super Bowl regardless of who is in it, but more as a social event with friends than with any serious rooting interest.
|
12:32 |
Who will perform at a higher level in 2014: Boston infielder Xander Bogaerts or Seattle infielder Brad Miller? The WAR projections at ZIPS, Steamer and Oliver are close. |
12:32 |
: Bogaerts.
|
12:33 |
Which team has had the best off-season? |
12:33 |
: The Nationals.
|
12:33 |
Who had the better career: Greg Maddux or Randy Johnson? |
12:33 |
: Maddux.
|
12:34 |
Why are Zips and Steamer so far off on the Reds. Zips has them at 41 WAR (per todays article) while Steamer (per the Depth Charts) is at 31. A 10 win difference and enough for Sullivan to suggest they are not a contender in 2014. What gives. |
12:34 |
: ZIPS likes the Reds pitchers a lot more.
|
12:34 |
Do the Mariners have the revenue to buy their way to some minimal level of having a chance at contention until they get the front office right? |
12:34 |
: That’s what they’re trying right now.
|
12:35 |
Have you really never said the F word in your entire life? Not even once? |
12:35 |
: Yeah, I just have never really been a cusser. Didn’t grow up around it being used much, never really felt the need to do so.
|
12:36 |
Would you view the Hall as more of a baseball museum where all PED guys should get in or an elite club for those there is no question about? |
12:36 |
: It is a museum. I don’t think we should pretend its not.
|
12:36 |
For next year only who would you rather have: Ubaldo, E. Santana, Garza, or AJ Burnett? |
12:36 |
: Burnett.
|
12:36 |
Is there anything you’re really looking forward to seeing in 2014? |
12:37 |
: The ski slopes. I’m taking a week off in a couple of weeks to go skiing, and I couldn’t be more excited.
|
12:37 |
Sounds like Homer Bailey is heading for FA after this season. If he puts up similar numbers to last 2 years, do you think he reaches 100m contract? |
12:37 |
: Easy. Probably closer to $150M.
|
12:37 |
Can the Jays build a deal for Franklin around Gose? They probably need to add more but how close can Gose get them? |
12:37 |
: Considering Anthony Gose is terrible, I would say no.
|
12:38 |
How are park factors calculated? Are home team stats ignored? It seems like a team with a good offense could have an artificially-inflated park factor – but then, you could say the same about the visitor stats if the park’s home team has a bad pitching staff. |
12:39 |
: The team’s own players don’t really have a significant effect, because they are measured as the difference between the team’s performance at home and on the road. So if you have lousy pitchers everywhere, it’s not going to show up as a park effect.
|
12:39 |
What O’s need to do to contend? |
12:39 |
: Get an LF, 2B, and DH.
|
12:39 |
Really, how good was Tim Raines? |
12:40 |
: Fantastic.
|
12:40 |
Are the Tigers fading? I see Cleveland and Kansas City as serious competition, with Minnesota and Chicago not too far behind |
12:40 |
: Detroit is still clearly better than both.
|
12:40 |
: And the Twins suck.
|
12:41 |
$ 400 MM just money.. and not yours |
12:42 |
: This kind of thought process is so silly. It has nothing to do whether its mine or theirs or whoevers. Unused currency can be used to buy other things, so just look at a a trade for whatever else they could have bought for $400 million. You don’t say “it’s not my players” when someone makes a bad trade.
|
12:43 |
How much would Mauer get if he were a Free Agebt? |
12:43 |
: 6/120ish.
|
12:43 |
In the end doesn’t the HoF voting system reflect the majority and get it right in that sense? Radicals won’t let there be a unamious selection but who cares, that’s not the point.. |
12:44 |
: Why do we think that veteran baseball writers are representative of the population of fans?
|
12:44 |
Will Randy Johnson be a 1st ballot guy? |
12:44 |
: Yep.
|
12:45 |
If you’re the Braves GM how soon do you start shopping JUpton and Heyward? |
12:45 |
: Next winter.
|
12:45 |
Is it fair to say Matt Holliday deserved to be included in your future HoF post but was forgotten on accident? |
12:45 |
: He wasn’t forgotten. He just missed the cut.
|
12:46 |
Is Anon21 a notorious Braves homer? That exchange felt like I walked into a room with two people at each other’s throats. |
12:46 |
: He has spent the last few years being remarkably antagonistic about any perceived slight towards the Braves.
|
12:47 |
Where would you rank Pedro Martinez’ peak? Top 5? |
12:47 |
: Peak? Top 3, easy, maybe top 1.
|
12:47 |
How do I have a job after GIVING AWAY Doug Fister to the Nationals? |
12:47 |
: One bad trade doesn’t get you fired.
|
12:47 |
Imagine every player in the MLB/MiLB is a free agent. Besides Mike Trout, who gets the next largest/longest contract and what would it be? |
12:48 |
: Bryce Harper.
|
12:48 |
: And in a hypothetical world where everyone is a free agent, prices come way down for the top guys, so less than you think.
|
12:49 |
Isnt’ skiing terrifying? |
12:49 |
: Not really. I don’t tuck and go 90 mph straight down the mountain, though.
|
12:50 |
Aren’t the Orioles a better trade partner for Nick Franklin? |
12:50 |
: They don’t have any extra good outfielders either.
|
12:50 |
How would you rate Piazza’s chances next year? |
12:50 |
: Slim.
|
12:52 |
Did you just say $150 million for Homer Bailey? |
12:52 |
: Homer Bailey is quietly very good.
|
12:52 |
: I’d probably take him over Tanaka.
|
12:53 |
Why are advanced stats in baseball so much further ahead than in other sports? |
12:53 |
: It is easier to isolate player performance in baseball than in other sports, where there is far more player interaction.
|
12:53 |
Over / Under – 1.5 Voters that did not vote for Maddux? |
12:53 |
: Way over.
|
12:53 |
If you were to rank all of the offseasons so far, where would the White Sox rank? |
12:53 |
: Near the top. I really like what they did.
|
12:54 |
Freeman’s line with RISP: .443/.591/.695. incredible luck? or different approach with RISP? |
12:54 |
: Luck.
|
12:54 |
Calling the Nationals/Tigers transaction involving Doug Fister a “trade” is being really generous to the Tigers. They got zip. |
12:54 |
: Well, that’s not really true. A lefty who got into the mid-90s and pitched well at Double-A isn’t zip.
|
12:55 |
: But they certainly didn’t get enough.
|
12:55 |
Aren’t Dodgers and Mariners best fit for a Franklin swap? |
12:55 |
: Dodgers just spent $30 million on a second baseman.
|
12:56 |
2012>2013>2014 a fair representation of the Reds trajectory? |
12:56 |
: Unless they actually start doing something this winter, yes.
|
12:56 |
Do you assume that most, major league hitters batted ball profiles are optimized based on underlying skills; pitch recognition, contact, ect? |
12:56 |
: Yeah, I would guess that hitters are good at maximizing their own skills.
|
12:56 |
Was Chris Sale considered for your HoF column? His career numbers are very similar to Strasburgs, and at this point, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say he’s the better pitcher. |
12:57 |
: Considered, but missed the cut.
|
12:57 |
Do you think the Phillies will make a run at Tanaka? I think they have taken a reasonable path this offseason at trying to avoid an Astros like spiral while avoiding long term commitments/draft pick losses, but Tanaka just seems like someone every team with money should be in on. |
12:58 |
: Everyone with money is in on him, which is why the price is probably going to be ridiculous.
|
12:58 |
Do you ski in the NC/VA/WV mountains or do you travel to a more exotic location? |
12:58 |
: We’re going to Snowshoe in WV. It’s the best place in the southeast, and a reasonable drive from where we live. I’d love to go ski out west again, but when you add flights and rental cars to lodging/lift tickets/food, it gets expensive fast.
|
12:59 |
Are you surprised how easily Glavine appears to be going in? I think he’s definitely deserving…but I think it’s very easy to make a case that he’s somewhere on the fringes of the top 10 on the ballot, so I’d expect him to be left off more often. |
12:59 |
: 300 wins. That’s enough for most voters to not care about much else.
|
1:00 |
: Okay, have to go eat lunch and prepare for HOF silly hour.
|
1:00 |
: Thanks for hanging out, everyone.
|
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
Le señalo como simples ejemplos dos fichas Fangraphs que tengo ante mí. Una de ellas es la trayectoria deportiva de Babe Ruth, la otra es la de Cap Anson.
En la sección final (“Value”) de la hoja del Bambino aparecen las columnas cuya sumatoria final (última fila) conduce a las RAR, es decir:
Offense (1347.3), Defense (-18.6), League (47.8) y Replacement (325.2). Ese resultado (1701.8) coincide con la cifra reportada en la col. RAR (penúltima a la derecha). Ahora bien: en base a la teoría, 1701.8 / 10 debería darnos la cifra WAR final de Babe Ruth, pero en la última columna, Fangraphs nos publica un WAR de 168.4.
Esta discrepancia es todavía más notable en otras fichas que he revisado. En el caso de Cap Anson, las RAR alcanzan 1086.2, mientras el WAR queda en 91.2, obviamente bien lejos de 1086.2 / 10.
Le hago notar que en las hojas de baseball-reference a menudo ocurren similares desacuerdos en cuanto a RAR/10 y el WAR en jugadores de cualquier época.
Volviendo a Fangraphs: me queda claro que este sitio presenta la Ofensiva en sus dos componentes (Batting + – Base Running), así como la Defensiva ya ajustada (Fielding + – Positional). Aunque no se muestra por separado, se incluye también una corrección por factor parque, pero no entiendo el contenido de la columna”League”. Le agradecería me ilustrara sobre dicho ajuste .
Hay otro dato preocupante y que no tiene nada que ver con cálculos sabermétricos. Cuando nos remitimos a la lista Fangraphs de los más altos WAR alcanzados (jugadores de posición) vemos que Barry Bonds aparece en un segundo lugar histórico con 164.1. Pero lo que en realidad me sorprende es un dato bien elemental: tanto Baseball-reference como Baseball-prospectus le dan una cifra oficial de juegos (G) de por vida de 2986, mientras que Fangraphs publica 2976. Le apunto que he encontrado diferencias aún mayores en otros casos: Fangraphs “games” de Rickey Henderson 3068,
Reference y Prospectus 3081.
Agradeciendo de antemano su amabilidad, espero contar con su apoyo para aclarar estas interrogantes.
Emilio
Si.
Yo no puedo hablar de las discrepancias con WAR, pero me gustaría hacer referencia probablemente a Baseball Reference para estadísticas duras como partidos jugados.
Google Translated:
I point out as mere examples Fangraphs two tabs that I have before me . One is the sporting career of Babe Ruth , the other is Cap Anson .
In the final section ( “Value”) Bambino leaf columns appear whose final sum ( row ) leads to the RAR , ie :
Offense ( 1347.3 ) , Defense ( -18.6 ) , League (47.8 ) and Replacement ( 325.2 ) . This result ( 1701.8 ) agrees with the figure reported in col . RAR ( penultimate right) . Now, based on the theory , 1701.8 / 10 should give us the final figure of Babe Ruth WAR , but in the last column , we published Fangraphs WAR of 168.4 .
This discrepancy is even more noticeable in other tabs I’ve reviewed. For Cap Anson , the RAR reaches 1086.2 , while 91.2 WAR is obviously far from 1086.2 / 10 .
I do notice that in the baseball -reference sheets often similar disagreement about RAR/10 and WAR players any time they occur.
Returning to Fangraphs : clear to me that this site has the offensive in its two components ( Batting + – Base Running ) and Defensive already set ( Fielding + – Positional ) . Although not shown separately, also includes a correction factor for the park , but do not understand the contents of the ” League” column. Please let me illustrate on this adjustment .
Another issue of concern and that has nothing to do with sabermetric calculations. When we refer to the list of Fangraphs WAR highest achieved ( position players ) we see that Barry Bonds appears in a second historic place with 164.1 . But what really surprised me is a rather elementary fact: Baseball and Baseball -reference – prospectus give an official number of games (G ) for life in 2986 while both Fangraphs publishes 2976 . Hello I think I have found even greater differences in other cases : Fangraphs “games” Rickey Henderson 3068 ,
Reference and Prospectus 3081 .
Thanking you in advance for your kindness, I look forward to your support to clarify these questions.
The number of runs per win is based on the run environment at the time — the fact that for a few years it was at ~10 is sort of just a coincidence.
Wow. Google Translate works amazingly well.
A Spanish-speaking analytics guy? The next market inefficiency. GET ON IT FRIEDMAN!
La ecuación RAR/10 = WAR es solamente una guía que da un idea general como traducir RAR a WAR. En realidad, el denominador exacto cambia sobre los años porque el medio ambiente de carreras cambia también. Por ejemplo, en un año con más carreras que un año normal, el denominador sería más que 10. Sin embargo, el denominador siempre está cerca de 10. Por eso, la ecuación RAR/10 = WAR es una guía útil.