FanGraphs Chat – 5/18/11





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Matt
15 years ago

Why do you love the Mariners you biased prick!

filihok
15 years ago

You never answer my questions, you biased prick!

Matt Cain
15 years ago

I’m still better than you, Dave.

charles
15 years ago

if u need ur questions answered send them to freak33322@yahoo.com, ill answer them for u and im better than this dave cameron guy

Chris
15 years ago

Help me understand what seems to me to be a contradiction: it’s preferable that pitchers induce GB, since that prevents HRs, yet GB also lead to a higher BABIP, correct? By the same logic, can we say that hitters with a high % of GB are preferable? What’s an optimal GB% for hitters?

filihok
15 years ago
Reply to  Chris

For hitters it is totally dependent on the hitter.

Ichiro hits groundballs about 55% of the time. That’s probably optimal for him since he’s fast and can beat out a lot of infield hits. Ichiro hits home runs about 6% of the time he hits a flyball.

Jose Bautista wouldn’t be nearly as good if he hit the ball on the ground 55% of the time. Bautista hits groundballs about 30% of the time. Bautista hits home runs about 14% of the time he hits a flyball.

Obviously, Bautista should try and hit the ball in the air while Ichiro shouldn’t.

Remember home runs aren’t Balls In Play.

johngomes
15 years ago
Reply to  Chris

derek lowe is a great example, his sinker is $.

only a few guys can take his sinker yard, you gotta be super strong or hit a sinker thats up ( brett wallace muscled one out 380+ feet )

he uses alex gonzalez to field the balls a great defensive shortstop…

i think you want guys that hit over 18.7% LD rate and do not strike out a lot. also joey votto has not hit a infield pop up since 2009, guys with low infield fly ball rates are perferred.

so in summary low infield flyball (below 3%) + low strikeout + 18.7 + LD ( get guys that qualify in all three and can steal some bags and show ISO. good luck

U-G
15 years ago

Danks is totally overrated. Should have traded him for Jose Lopez when we had the chance.

U-G
15 years ago
Reply to  Dave Cameron

So Danks and his 5.1 WAR still isn’t better than Vargas’ 3.5, Lowe’s 0, and Lopez’s 0.3? Even with Vargas costing $2.45MM, Lowe $1.2MM, Lopez $3.6MM against Danks making $6MM?

And it’s not really “conveniently left out”. The main focus from that article was Lopez for Danks, unless you forgot.

“Now that you’ve turned Morrow and Lopez into Hardy and Danks, it’s time to spend a little money.”

colintj
15 years ago
Reply to  Dave Cameron

Numbers like a 6% HR/FB rate?

Terry
15 years ago

Jose Lopez was a steal jerko. John Danks is 0-6.

Jason B
15 years ago
Reply to  Terry

If someone stole Jose Lopez, they would probably return the defective merchandise to its original owner…

taite
15 years ago

Where can I find this bunting primer of which you speak? Sounds interesting….you biased prick?