FanGraphs Power Rankings: 2023 Playoffs Edition

The race to the playoffs provided plenty of drama over the past month. The battle for a Wild Card spot ended up coming down to the wire in both leagues, and the AL West wasn’t completely wrapped up until the final day of the season. But we’ve finally made it to the main event, where anything can happen and underdogs can topple giants. Here’s a look at the 12 teams in the playoffs and how they stack up against each other.
A reminder for how these rankings are calculated: first, we take the three most important components of a team — their offense (wRC+), their pitching (a 50/50 blend of FIP- and RA9-, weighted by starter and reliever IP share), and their defense (RAA) — and combine them to create an overall team quality metric. Since regular season records don’t matter in the playoffs, I’ve removed the factors for win percentage and expected win percentage from the calculations.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | World Series Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rays | 99-63 | -1 | 118 | 90 | 96 | 2 | 155 | 6.0% |
| Braves | 104-58 | 3 | 125 | 95 | 91 | -10 | 148 | 20.2% |
Not many other teams in the league could weather the loss of three frontline starting pitchers, a franchise shortstop, and numerous other role players, but thanks to their incredible organizational depth, excellent leverage of the strengths on their roster, and one shrewd move at the trade deadline, the Rays are headed to their fifth straight postseason. They accumulated at least 17 wins in every month during the season save for a rough July that saw them win just eight games. Now they’re looking for 13 more wins to capture that elusive World Series championship.
Of course, all those injuries have serious implications for how well the Rays will be able to keep up with some of the other juggernauts in October, but they barely skipped a beat during the regular season after losing those players. Junior Caminero, their current starting shortstop, is an ascendant 20-year-old prospect who only made his major league debut a week and a half ago — he has the opportunity to make a huge impact this postseason, much like Shane McClanahan did a few years ago. More importantly, their bullpen is significantly improved after a rough start to the season — they enter the playoffs as one of the strongest relief units in baseball.
In the National League, no team could come close to toppling the Braves. They ended the season with the best record in baseball and are the odds on favorite to represent the Senior Circuit in the World Series this year. Their lineup has simply crushed the ball all season long — they’re the first major league team to ever slug over .500 in a single season — and that should carry them deep into October. There are a few more question marks on their pitching staff. Spencer Strider and Max Fried are a formidable one-two punch atop their rotation, but Charlie Morton’s injury and Kyle Wright’s late-season ineffectiveness has the rest of their playoff rotation up in the air. Their bullpen has faltered a bit in September as well, posting the fifth-worst adjusted FIP in baseball over the final month of the regular season. Those are challenges they’ll have to overcome to secure their second championship in the last three years.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | World Series Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dodgers | 100-62 | 0 | 116 | 102 | 86 | 0 | 145 | 17.2% |
| Rangers | 90-72 | -6 | 114 | 93 | 105 | 14 | 155 | 4.6% |
| Blue Jays | 89-73 | 0 | 107 | 91 | 87 | 12 | 159 | 7.1% |
Like the Rays, the Dodgers are one of those rare teams that can handle the loss of three frontline starting pitchers. Thanks to the phenomenal debut of Bobby Miller, the continued brilliance of Clayton Kershaw, and a deep bullpen, their pitching staff looks good enough for postseason play. They’ve also got two MVP candidates atop their lineup in Mookie Betts and Freddie Freeman, who they’ll be relying on to carry the load this October. But this isn’t the juggernaut Dodgers we’ve seen steamroll through the playoffs over the past few seasons. That didn’t prevent them from winning 100 games for the third consecutive season and the fifth time in the last six full seasons, but there are question marks the deeper you go on their roster.
The Rangers also head into the postseason with significant injuries to their pitching staff. The loss of Jacob deGrom early this season and Max Scherzer more recently has pushed Jordan Montgomery and Nathan Eovaldi to the front of their rotation, with the starters behind them a bit of a question mark as well. Their bullpen has also been a mess, with the fourth-worst adjusted ERA in baseball over the final month of the season. This team will almost certainly be carried by their lineup, which is finally healthy after a few injury scares over the past few months. They’re surely beating themselves up about missing out on the second seed in the American League and the first round bye that comes with it, but their turnaround from 100 losses just two years ago has been remarkable.
After a pair of quick playoff exits over the last three years sandwiched between an agonizing 91-win season in which they barely missed out on the postseason, the Blue Jays are still looking for that big breakthrough with the current core of youngsters they’ve assembled. Their lineup is a little more balanced this year, they play excellent defense across the field, and their pitching staff is led by a dark horse AL Cy Young candidate in Kevin Gausman. But despite posting a very good 107 wRC+ as a team, their power output has lagged behind a bit; they posted a collective .160 ISO, good for 18th in the majors. That lack of pop from their big bats — namely Vladimir Guerrero Jr. — could spell trouble in the condensed play in October.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | World Series Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orioles | 101-61 | 7 | 105 | 96 | 85 | -10 | 126 | 6.9% |
| Twins | 87-75 | -6 | 109 | 87 | 95 | -10 | 140 | 1.7% |
| Phillies | 90-72 | 1 | 105 | 92 | 89 | -4 | 134 | 6.5% |
| Astros | 90-72 | -3 | 112 | 102 | 94 | 8 | 132 | 20.3% |
| Brewers | 92-70 | 2 | 92 | 92 | 86 | 34 | 122 | 3.7% |
Say what you want about the Orioles’ regular season record (and their position in these power rankings all season long), but the postseason is a completely different endeavor, one where the flaws on a roster are only exacerbated. Baltimore’s lineup can really hit, even if they don’t have the big time power that usually portends October success, and their bullpen has carried the team at times, even without All-Star closer Félix Bautista. The O’s biggest weakness is in their rotation, where they don’t have a top shelf ace to carry them through the postseason. Still, they’ve finally broken out of their long rebuilding cycle and look like a team that will be in the mix for a World Series for the foreseeable future.
This could finally be the year the Twins put their postseason woes behind them; they haven’t won a postseason game since 2004 — a losing streak of 18 games — and haven’t won a postseason series since 2002. They assembled the best starting rotation in baseball this year and are surely hoping those starters will be able to carry them deep into October. Their lineup isn’t in very good shape right now, however. Carlos Correa, Royce Lewis, and Joey Gallo are all nursing lower body injuries, though they all seem to be on track to be activated off the IL for the playoffs. The status of Byron Buxton is much more up in the air — it would be a surprise to see him make a significant contribution in the playoffs.
The Phillies spent much of the first half of the season floundering as Bryce Harper and Trea Turner scuffled, but they finally got things going once those two started to perform up to their usual high standards. The Phils are running back the same blueprint that drove their success last October in the hope that it’ll work again this year, only this time with the addition of Turner. Their big weakness last year — their bullpen — was addressed via big offseason acquisitions, veteran breakouts, and a young potential phenom. They’ve got as good a shot as anyone at toppling the Braves this October.
Thanks to a late surge up the standings during the final week of the season, the Astros managed to eke out their sixth AL West division title in the last seven years. They’ll enter the postseason as the second seed in the AL, giving them a significant advantage in their quest to reach their seventh consecutive ALCS and become the first team to win back-to-back World Series titles since the 2000 Yankees. Even with Justin Verlander back in the fold after a midseason trade, Houston’s pitching staff simply isn’t as strong as it was last year. Our projection systems don’t see it that way, though, giving the Stros the best odds of lifting the Commissioner’s Trophy at the end of the season among the AL contenders.
After missing out on the postseason last year, breaking a four-year streak, the Brewers are back in the playoffs, relying on the same brand of baseball that has brought them so much regular season success over the last half decade but that has resulted in limited postseason success. They really hit their stride over the last two months of the season, producing a 35-20 record in August and September. That surge was powered by a lineup that was suddenly scoring plenty of runs to support Milwaukee’s outstanding pitching staff. They’ll have to hope that newfound offensive prowess carries over into the postseason because their pitching-heavy model hasn’t worked in October yet.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | World Series Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diamondbacks | 84-78 | 4 | 97 | 101 | 100 | 26 | 106 | 3.5% |
| Marlins | 84-77 | 9 | 94 | 95 | 102 | -22 | 78 | 2.3% |
The Diamondbacks made the postseason for the first time since 2017 thanks to Corbin Carroll’s phenomenal rookie campaign and the excellent pitching of Zac Gallen and Merrill Kelly. While they have an interesting mix of youth and veteran contributors on their roster, there are also plenty of holes behind their top contributors. Still, even if they don’t have a deep run in them this October, this season should be seen as a success because they’ve broken out of their rebuilding phase ahead of schedule.
The Marlins made the postseason for just the fourth time in franchise history, and remember, two of those previous appearances ended with the Commissioner’s Trophy being held high. This team might not be good enough to keep that trend alive, but the Marlins are young and hungry. Unfortunately, they’re dealing with some injury issues that could seriously hamper them in the early rounds. Luis Arraez has been nursing an ankle sprain for the past week and has been limited to only pinch hitting duties. They’re also missing Sandy Alcantara and Eury Pérez in their starting rotation, though the latter could be back for the NLDS if they advance out of the first round.
…
| Rank | Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | World Series Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rays | 99-63 | -1 | 118 | 90 | 96 | 2 | 155 | 6.0% |
| 2 | Braves | 104-58 | 3 | 125 | 95 | 91 | -10 | 148 | 20.2% |
| 3 | Dodgers | 100-62 | 0 | 116 | 102 | 86 | 0 | 145 | 17.2% |
| 4 | Rangers | 90-72 | -6 | 114 | 93 | 105 | 14 | 155 | 4.6% |
| 5 | Blue Jays | 89-73 | 0 | 107 | 91 | 87 | 12 | 159 | 7.1% |
| 6 | Orioles | 101-61 | 7 | 105 | 96 | 85 | -10 | 126 | 6.9% |
| 7 | Twins | 87-75 | -6 | 109 | 87 | 95 | -10 | 140 | 1.7% |
| 8 | Phillies | 90-72 | 1 | 105 | 92 | 89 | -4 | 134 | 6.5% |
| 9 | Astros | 90-72 | -3 | 112 | 102 | 94 | 8 | 132 | 20.3% |
| 10 | Brewers | 92-70 | 2 | 92 | 92 | 86 | 34 | 122 | 3.7% |
| 11 | Diamondbacks | 84-78 | 4 | 97 | 101 | 100 | 26 | 106 | 3.5% |
| 12 | Marlins | 84-77 | 9 | 94 | 95 | 102 | -22 | 78 | 2.3% |
Jake Mailhot is a contributor to FanGraphs. A long-suffering Mariners fan, he also writes about them for Lookout Landing. Follow him on BlueSky @jakemailhot.
Trust me, these rankings were trolling well enough without bumping the Braves out of first place.
Injuries don’t matter, remember!
However, the rankings do peg the Braves with a nearly 3.5 times better chance than Tampa Bay to reach the Fall Classic.
Rankings or not, the postseason is subject to a huge level of variation. While some teams appear stronger than others on paper and on regular season performance, that matters little to nothing.
All predictions now are a finger in the wind with one based on analytics no more likely to be correct than a dog, horse or monkey choosing names out of a hat.
So, with that caveat, I see the Orioles winning the AL and Dodgers the NL, with the Series being 1966 2.0 as the pundits pooh-pooh the Orioles starting staff only to have them dominate in route to a 5-game near-sweep.
“The O’s biggest weakness is in their rotation, where they don’t have a top shelf ace to carry them through the postseason.”
Kyle Bradish and Grayson Rodriguez are top 6 in 2nd half ERA. Bradish is top 10 in full season, with 4 others in the top 10 missing the playoffs. He’s as frontline starter as anyone else.
Bradish has plenty of positives and is very good, but I would certainly not call him a top shelf ace with plenty of the underlying metrics not being high on him and the lack of blow-you-away stuff or elite command. Especially since he’s still very untested in the “win-or-go-home” atmosphere of the playoffs. He could be great! But he could also fold.
And behind them, it’s Dean Kremer and Kyle Gibson. Neither of whom inspires any confidence.
Kremer has been pitching pretty well too. Gibson…meh
The underlying metrics see Kremer as a #4 starter, and I agree with them. He has positives, but depending on him in the playoffs isn’t what I’d call a good sign, especially since players tend to pitch more to their metrics than surface results in the postseason.
In what universe is Grayson and Means not the next two behind Bradish? What metric isn’t so positive on Bradish? The only guy ahead of Bradish in Stuff+ is Burnes. Grayson is 4th in Stuff + since July 1st. The Orioles starters ERA is the 2nd best in baseball since the All-Start break.
As for Bradish being untested, the Orioles have had a ton of must-win games in the last two months where their starters have posted. In particular in the 4 game series with the Rays followed by the 3 game series with Houston.
Obviously they just copied and pasted this same take from July. To leave GRod and Means out of the conversation tells you everything. I don’t think eon will be back to refute your comment. Bradish has some of the best stuff+ in baseball to go along with his 4th best era in baseball but being he isn’t a household name he can’t be top tier. What a joke.
GRod was mentioned in the original comment and is the second one alluded to in my comment. “Behind them” in this case meaning behind Bradish and G-Rod. I’ll admit that wasn’t 100% clear, but it’s not hard to figure out. C- Reading comprehension, see me after class.
Do you honestly expect the Orioles to run a 3-man rotation with two of the 3 being rookies and the third coming back from an injury, also? Because that’s not smart unless they plan on pulling them after two times through the order no matter what.
Means, I’ll give you. Total brain fart.
They didn’t pay attention. Kremer or Gibson isn’t even going to be a postseason starter. GRod and Means have sub 3 ERA with GRod being since July and Means in his 4 starts since coming back. It’s a shame that national sites just keep recycling the same garbage about the Orioles starters. Bradish is going to finish top 5 in Cy young but isn’t top shelf because his name isn’t known.
Oh come on. Bradish had a fine season and certainly is not going to be top 5 in Cy Young, and Means has struck out 10 of 88 batters faced in his return. GRod has had a superb second half but that’s hardly a track record of success to bank on in the playoffs.
It should not be controversial to say Bmore has very weak SP.
It should also not be controversial that the starting pitching they will run out in the postseason is significantly better than the rotation that formed the basis for it’s 2023 regular season metrics. Could it bomb? Absolutely. Could it throw 22 innings and allow 2 runs against the Rays? Also absolutely.
That’s why I focused on the 3 pitchers most likely to start games and what they’ve done lately. But thanks for bringing up that anything can happen, very compelling reasoning.
Orioles fans have repeatedly seen their starters, esp Bradish and G-Rod, outpitch the aces of many teams. I promise you if we didn’t have confidence we would be the first to admit the starters are a problem. Ironically, I think more of us are worried about the recently slumping offense.
“In what universe is Grayson and Means not the next two behind Bradish?”
GRod was included. “Behind them” does not refer solely to Bradish. Means, I will give you. I completely forgot that he was on the team, somehow. I blame lack of sleep. GRod and Means plenty good (I’d still bet against GRod being some kind of instant sensation, tbh, but that’s not a knock on him, just the way first-time pitchers tend to go in the playoffs, especially for breakout squads). But the Orioles aren’t running out ONLY two young arms, one of them a rookie, and a guy coming back from injury, especially with a somewhat depleted bullpen with the lack of Felix Bautista. Kremer will get at least some length in the playoffs. Maybe not in the first round, but certainly after.
“What metric isn’t so positive on Bradish?”
How about that his SIERA and xERA both being way higher than his actual ERA? How about his Whiff rate being in the 47th percentile? How about his chase rate being 35th percentile? His average Exit Velocity being in the 23rd? His Hard Hit% being in the 27th? Yes, his GB rate is awesome, but the combination of below-average whiffs and tons of hard contact is concerning, especially since his 4-seam fastball (his second most-used pitch, and his most-used without question against left-handed hitters) is garbage (.399 xBA, .570 xSLG). Especially given Camden’s tendency to still give up more homers to left-handed hitters, even after the remodeling. No doubt that he’s great. I even said that he’s very good. But he’s not an Ace, and he does have underlying (potential) problems. I’d bet he can become an Ace. But he’s not there yet.
“The Orioles starters ERA is the 2nd best in baseball since the All-Start break.”
Good for them! Doesn’t change that the postseason is always a different animal, and that they’ll be facing top offenses the whole way. Plus, they have a layoff. And everyone knows how much that can screw with a pitching staff, especially if they’ve gotten a hot streak going like the Orioles did. Even more so for sinkerballers.
“[The] Orioles have had a ton of must-win games in the last two months where their starters have posted.”
That is not the same as postseason experience. Do you remember how badly Luis Severino fared in the 2017 WC game? He completely mentally collapsed and got yanked in the first inning. Mike Clevinger did the same later that year. Shane Bieber did it even in his second attempt at postseason experience, in addition to his first. Tons of really good, promising players suffer in their first postseason. And it’s far more common than the reverse.
I’ll trust Bradish after he shows he can win a playoff game. Not one second earlier.
On top of that, given that the Orioles have been in “win-now” mode, going full-bore for the last two months, I’d bet on at least some noticeable fatigue, and not just for the pitchers. Tends to happen in close races.
Hopefully this is a satisfactory answer for my thoughts on the subject.
Can’t say I agree with everything you say, but appreciate and respect the response.
A true ace is someone you bring into a playoff start and know that your team will have a good chance to win that game. Someone you start when your team absolutely has to win that game. The playoffs are a different beast and until they can prove they’re capable of getting through some of the best lineups in the league consistently I’m not going to call a couple playoff rookies aces.
Don’t get me wrong, I believe 100% they’ll both be at that level and I’m rooting for the O’s to win it all, but I’m not going to call them aces until they prove it in the playoffs.
about the dumbest stuff I’ve read today. Have to have playoff success to be an Ace. Essentially Kershaw wasn’t an ace majority of his career and maybe still isn’t bc he is 13-12 with a 4.22 era in the postseason. Strider isn’t an ace neither is anyone in the Braves rotation currently. Sonny Gray hasn’t been to the playoffs in 6 years is he an Ace? No aces on TB roster either.
Love to use ERA splits as an argument on fangraphs dot com
Wanna use FIP? They’re 4th and 11th. The reason I used 2nd half is because that’s when Grayson was recalled. He was awful in April and May, got sent down, and came back a new pitcher, looking just like all his prospect hype predicted. How about refuting the point rather than dismissing without rebuttal?
Go ahead and call guys ‘frontline starters’ based on a half season of splits, it’s all semantics anyways. This comment section is all aggrieved O’s fans anyways so you’re in good company.
But you are fine with relying on results from the first half of the season? Anyone that has watched Grayson once he came back can see his velocity was up, his command was far superior, his wind-up which was tipping his pitches was changed, and he could now throw his secondaries for strikes. I can understand being skeptical though, if you haven’t watched. As for pitching with pressure, the Orioles had lost their first two games against the Rays who were now within .5 games of the Orioles in September. Grayson was pitching against Glasnow (whom I assume you would say is an ace). Grayson went 8IP with 0ER, 7Ks and no walks. Glasnow had 4IP with 8H and 6ER.
The funniest thing is that the Astros are ranked 9th here, worse than every AL playoff team. And I’m not even saying they don’t deserve to be 9th, because it’s a team that was leading the division and almost lost it because they were swept by the Yankees and went 2-7 against A’s/Royals to nearly crap the bed. So they’re hardly a juggernaut team like some of the past Astros teams.
But both Fangraphs and ZIPs projections have them as the 2nd highest favorite to win the World Series at 19% and 18% respectively. I wonder how much of that “they’ve been proven playoff winners” thing play into the projections cause I cannot for the life of me see why they’re so bullish when the other numbers for this team look so meh.
The Astros offense is finally healthy which is probably baked into the projections.
That 112 wRC+ over the entire season includes extended absences from numerous starters. Contrast this with the 127 wRC+ over the 2nd half. That performance is just a shred lower than the well lauded Braves 129 wRC+ over the 2nd half.
There’s no way that the Astros offense finally being healthy is being baked into these rankings, when the Rays who have had more injuries than any other team (playoffs or not, and it not particularly close) and they still have a higher “team quality” than the Braves and are ranked #1 overall.
Astros have the 2nd best WS odds because:
As the 2 seed they get a Wild Card Round bye and automatically advance to the Divisional round
The Orioles, Rangers, and Rays share the other half of the AL bracket so they will fight it out to reach the ALCS. Astros just have to beat the winner of the Blue Jays/Twins to reach another ALCS
As RolDer mentioned, the offense has been great with the return of Altuve, Yordan, and Brantley
The Astros biggest weakness is starting pitching outside of Valdez and Verlander. That weakness is minimized by the format of the playoffs and further by the quality and quantity of the bullpen arms
the first round bye plays a huge role in the odds as well. they basically have to win less games than everyone else(other than the orioles) to make it
In the case of the Orioles winning it all this year, I really hope there will be a post World Series power ranking. Where do you think they’d get ranked? 10th?
Don’t fret about the rankings – they are numbers based on a lot of metrics but on the field the game is played by humans with lots of variables in play. Even 162 games is a small sample to based ratings on, so they vary a lot and everyone gets worked up about them – which I guess is what makes them fun, but they aren’t really worth losing sleep over.
Sometimes, the 10th ranked team does end up getting into and often winning the World Series, anyway. Look at the 2012 and, I think one other Giants team, the 2006 Cardinals, the 2004 Red Sox, the 2022 Phillies, the 2019 Nationals….
Wherever Baltimore ends up ranked, they are the #1 seed in the AL and have as good a chance as any of the other 11 teams to win it all.
Enjoy the ride!!
I agree wholeheartedly! This season has been so much fun. I went, on a whim, to Thursday’s game when they clinched the division, and that moment when Tyler Wells yelled out and hugged McCann was one of the most joyful moments I’ve witnessed at a live sports event.
I intended the question to be humorous, but I am genuinely curious to see the how the naysayers will continue to dismiss and condescend to the Orioles. How many times can they be wrong and continue to say that this time will be different?
I’m just not seeing the argument for having Los Angeles in a different tier than Tampa Bay and Atlanta.
The pitching (and Atlanta’s incredible offense). Behind Kershaw and Miller, the Dodgers are SOL with Urias being away from the team indefinitely and not much behind him besides Pepiot. The Rays are four deep with Glasnow, Eflin, Civale, and Littell, and they always pull good relief pitching out of nothing. And the Braves still have Strider and Eldar with an elite bullpen, but also have far better production on offense than the Dodgers do. The difference between the first place Braves and the third place Dodgers in wRC+ is the same as the difference between the third place Dodgers and 11th place Orioles.
I don’t think you can really call the Braves’ bullpen elite. 10th in full-season WAR but a hideous 30th behind a 5.06 FIP and better-but-not-good 4.22 xFIP in September and October. Top arms in terms of traditional stuff are probably Iglesias and Minter, who are good/fine and good/great respectively. They have no middle relief to speak of.
The Braves bullpen was elite in the 1st half. That was eroded by injuries to Dylan Lee, Jesse Chavez, and Nick Anderson.
The Braves middle relief corp includes Pierce Johnson, Joe Jiménez, and Kirby Yates. They all get strikeouts, each averaging more than 11 K/9. That means the Braves have 5 qualified relievers in the top 50 in K/9 in Pierce Johnson, Joe Jiménez, Kirby Yates, Raisel Iglesias, and A.J. Minter.
The immortal Jesse Chavez is coming back from a microfracture on his shin bone caused by a comebacker from Miggy. He looks like he’ll be another middle relief option.
I wouldn’t read too much into the Braves bullpen performance in September/October. They clinched on 9/13 and went 8-8 the rest of the way as they tried some guys out who had been injured and tried to give other guys some rest.
If you aren’t a fan of Bradish, G-Rod, or Means (based on your comments above), I have no idea how you are including Littell as part of any “four deep” rotation.
“Aren’t a fan” like I didn’t say Bradish was a good pitcher and alluded to G-Rod being good (I thought the guy I was replying to did a good job with him), and only dinged them for lack of experience and some slight underlying debuffs. I said Kremer and Gibson don’t inspire confidence, not those two. Laughable lack of reading comprehension, airforce. Just because I’m lower on them than Orioles homers? C’mon.
You forgot Means existed as well, apparently, because you didn’t mention him at all above. Again, c’mon.
Also, Littell has shoved. He’s been on par with a full season of Kremer in just his starts. His ERA is 3.41 as a starter with over 5 IP per start. Surprise, he’s good, and has multiple years of experience plus playoff experience out of the Giants bullpen in 2021.
“The O’s biggest weakness is in their rotation, where they don’t have a top shelf ace to carry them through the postseason.”
Let’s just pretend that Kyle Bradish and Grayson Rodriguez weren’t both elite in the second half of the year. Bradish had a challenging start to the season getting hurt in his first game, but once he got going he’s been as good as anyone. Grayson Rodriguez has been as good as anyone in the back half as well. Power rankings should reflect trends.
But the most absurd thing here is having the Rays over the Braves.
These sure are some rankings!
I imagine this is the only MLB rankings in the universe that has anyone but the Braves in first place.
I think you could make a ranking with the Braves second to the Orioles, as the author surely has here….
“The O’s biggest weakness is in their rotation, where they don’t have a top shelf ace to carry them through the postseason”
I’ll take “not researching my article before I write it” for 100 Alex
I’m struggling to understand how the Twins have a “Team Quality” score of 140, but only 1.7% odds of winning the trophy while the Marlins (78 “Team Quality”) has 2.3% odds and Houston (132 “Team Quality”) has 20% odds. This certainly isn’t due zero postseason wins in their last 18 games, is it?
I’m assuming the odds come from ZIPs or Fangraphs. But it is weird – ignoring ‘Team Quality’ (as we should) – I’m not sure why they are that low. Would be interested to find out.
The Fangraphs world series odds have always seemed very off to me, which is a separate issue from this particular exercise being bunk.
As of today, the Twins WS odds are listed at 4.7% Which makes more sense, but makes me really curious what behind the scenes changes were made. I note3d awhile back that Atlanta’s WS odds were twice LA’s and that that didn’t pass the smell test – those also appear to have changed to something much more reasonable.
Edit: As of today the Braves are back to twice as likely as the Dodgers. That still seems like too much, and it’s clear to me that there are some major behind the scenes adjustments being made.
At some point you may want to fix the algorithm, rather than continuing to deny reality based upon the results that the algorithm provides.
It seems like the narrative is written to fit the flawed statistical analysis. So many sentences seem to justify a system that doesn’t take into account injuries or recent performance data.
I don’t wanna be a troll, but…the Rays have to play one more series than the Braves or Dodgers! And the Orioles and Astros! The Rays have to win 13 games whereas the other teams have to win 11! I just…I mean…I kinda wanna jump up and shout “BUT PROBABILITY!” over and over again. On the one hand I understand that Power Rankings are trying to measure something else, but…how is advantageous playoff positioning not power?
The Rays path looks especially daunting:
(WC)Rangers, (D)Orioles, (ALCS)Astros, (WS)Braves/Dodgers is the most likely path
If only the O’s had been a
weakernot as lucky team.Well, wild cards with the longer path have made it to the finals a lot in the past….more often than both #1 seeds get there.
Again, I am here jumping up and down screaming, “PROBABILITY!” “The field” is always more likely to win than any one team, even the number one seed.
These are so consistently bad that you need to find a new metric for the rankings next year or a different person to post them.
Go O’s
I think the Orioles, Marlins and Diamondbacks are better than you give them credit for here. Although the Marlins are a bit busted up to be sure!
Are these just full year stats for each team (instead of projections)? I assume so since the Orioles have the best RP- in the playoffs … but that’s not super helpful since Felix Bautista is out. Full year stats don’t say much about the roster these teams are carrying into the playoffs. The Rays lost 3 great starters, the Astros offense is healthy, the Marlins remade their offense at the deadline, etc. Projections for current roster would be much more useful.
Clown article, bro.
After spending the entire season reading these articles and the outraged Orioles fan’s comments underneath, I can’t decide if I want the O’s to win the world series to stick it to the author, or if I would prefer them to fall on their faces and get swept.
For whatever it’s worth, to echo the point made endlessly all year, the methodology to these power rankings makes absolutely zero sense to anyone but the author. Maybe the point is just to start some fires and get people riled up, in which case, Bravo!
I, for one, would prefer power rankings that I understand.
Keep Maryland drivers in this comment section, and off the road IMO
As long as they aren’t rage-commenting while they drive!
The interesting thing about this article is the contrast between season long underlying metrics, season long W-L record and current team strength. The Blue Jays were the “best” team in regular season, had 12 fewer wins than Baltimore and have a middling chance to win the WS.
Baltimore had the third “worst” regular season amongst playoff teams, the best W-L record and a similar chance to win the WS
Houston had a middling regular season both by W-L and underlying metrics but the favorite to win WS.
It may all be meaningless, but it’s kinda fun.
I don’t understand these rankings. The Rays are listed as “favorites” but have only 6% WS odds. The Dodgers are only “Challengers” but have 17% odds. And the Astros are in an even lower tier but have the highest odds of all?? These are strictly self-contradictory.
I know it’s a two-game sample size but….Not a great look when the #1 team looks like the worst roster in the playoffs while getting bounced by a combined score of 11-1.
I have said for months the Blue Jays were wildly overrated and provided proof thereof. I see that the postseason has proved me right. I don’t want to hear about short series, etc. If you are going to make those excuses you basically are saying nothing you say can ever judge your predictions. Anyhow, even Blue Jays fans knew their team was flawed. I hope that you are finally seeing it.