FanGraphs Power Rankings: July 14–23
The first FanGraphs Power Rankings of the second half of the season are here, and there are some significant movers in the rankings. As we hurtle toward the trade deadline, teams on the bubble have rapidly closing windows to get into the playoff picture or be left behind.
A reminder for how these rankings are calculated: first, we take the three most important components of a team — their offense (wRC+), their pitching (a 50/50 blend of FIP- and RA9-, weighted by starter and reliever IP share), and their defense (RAA) — and combine them to create an overall team quality metric. I also add in a factor for “luck,” adjusting a team’s win percentage based on expected win-loss record. The result is a power ranking, which is then presented in tiers below.
Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Braves | 64-34 | 1 | 120 | 92 | 83 | -8 | 159 | 100.0% |
Rangers | 59-41 | -4 | 121 | 93 | 103 | 14 | 165 | 82.9% |
Rays | 61-42 | -5 | 119 | 87 | 100 | 9 | 163 | 94.2% |
The Braves haven’t exactly had the smoothest start to the second half, losing consecutive series to the White Sox and Diamondbacks before taking two of three from the Brewers over the weekend, but they’re still miles ahead of any other team in the National League. As long as Ronald Acuña Jr. continues playing like the MVP favorite and Spencer Strider continues pitching like the Cy Young favorite, they’ll have an easy time walking into the playoffs for the sixth consecutive year.
The Rangers raced out with six straight wins after the All-Star break, including a sweep of the Rays earlier this week. The good times came to a halt over the weekend, as they were outscored 31–16 by the Dodgers. To make matters worse, Corey Seager exited Friday’s game with a sprained thumb, putting him on the IL for the second time this season. His timeline to return is still unclear, but Texas was able to weather his absence back in April.
The Rays limped into the All-Star break, and things haven’t gotten better since. They won their first series against the Royals but were swept by the Rangers and then lost a huge four-game series against the Orioles over the weekend, dropping them into second place in the AL East for the first time this season. The biggest problem has been an offense that’s suddenly a little inconsistent; they’ve scored just 4.1 runs per game over their last 20 contests and have scored more than five runs just once over their last 10.
Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dodgers | 57-41 | -1 | 115 | 101 | 95 | -1 | 139 | 97.5% |
Orioles | 61-38 | 7 | 105 | 102 | 87 | -9 | 116 | 88.0% |
Blue Jays | 55-45 | 1 | 108 | 93 | 88 | -2 | 147 | 70.9% |
Astros | 56-44 | 0 | 102 | 94 | 95 | 7 | 128 | 70.2% |
The Orioles have continued to exceed all expectations and now lead the hyper-competitive AL East. They recalled Grayson Rodriguez to give their rotation a shot in the arm and have a few more top prospects ready to make the leap to the majors should the need arise. It would be a little surprising to see them mortgage some of that future to bolster their roster this year since it’s already so deep with young talent. They did get some shopping done early, adding Shintaro Fujinami to help out a bullpen that’s been leaned on hard this season.
The Blue Jays aren’t the only team dealing with a rough start to the second half, but they don’t have much wiggle room to survive their inconsistencies in the crowded AL playoff picture. Their biggest issue is a stable of offensive stars who aren’t contributing up to their usual standards. Vladimir Guerrero Jr. won the Home Run Derby and has hit four dingers since the beginning of the second half, but his overall line still stands at just a 123 wRC+. George Springer, Daulton Varsho, and Alejandro Kirk are all struggling at the plate relative to their career norms, too. Their pitching staff is about to get a boost in the form of a healthy Hyun Jin Ryu, and they just added Génesis Cabrera to their bullpen. Toronto has a tough schedule heading into the trade deadline: three each against the Dodgers and Angels, and then a big four-game series against the Orioles next week.
Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Twins | 53-48 | -2 | 102 | 85 | 90 | -8 | 129 | 78.2% |
Diamondbacks | 54-46 | 3 | 103 | 104 | 102 | 15 | 119 | 51.5% |
Giants | 54-46 | 2 | 98 | 100 | 92 | 7 | 110 | 60.5% |
Mariners | 50-49 | -2 | 100 | 94 | 93 | 12 | 131 | 14.7% |
Padres | 48-52 | -8 | 103 | 88 | 102 | 16 | 146 | 35.9% |
Red Sox | 53-47 | -1 | 107 | 106 | 92 | -33 | 100 | 28.3% |
Both the Diamondbacks and Giants find themselves looking up at the Dodgers in the NL West after Los Angeles’ surge up the standings after the All-Star break. Arizona has lost four straight and seven of nine in the second half; San Francisco has lost five straight after winning its first five games out of the gate. The D-Backs’ success has been fun to watch, but it feels like their roster is a little too flawed to keep up with the rest of the field. Between these two teams, the Giants’ excellent bullpen seems like the biggest differentiator.
And then there are the Padres, six games behind the Giants and Diamondbacks and ten games behind the Dodgers. They’re too talented to give up on this season yet, but their window to make a move up the standings is becoming smaller and smaller. They did manage to win both of their series last week and have a big four-game series against the Dodgers looming in two weeks, just after the trade deadline. It’s possible they hit the soft reset button and move a rejuvenated Blake Snell if they don’t make any headway in the standings before then.
Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Angels | 51-49 | -1 | 114 | 103 | 104 | -3 | 114 | 13.9% |
Phillies | 53-46 | 3 | 98 | 90 | 94 | -4 | 105 | 65.4% |
Brewers | 55-45 | 6 | 87 | 97 | 91 | 12 | 91 | 72.0% |
Cubs | 48-51 | -6 | 101 | 96 | 95 | 4 | 115 | 13.1% |
Yankees | 53-47 | 1 | 96 | 105 | 88 | 4 | 97 | 35.1% |
Marlins | 54-47 | 6 | 98 | 92 | 99 | -10 | 82 | 48.0% |
Reds | 55-46 | 5 | 98 | 109 | 93 | -9 | 63 | 36.6% |
Guardians | 49-50 | 0 | 92 | 94 | 92 | 2 | 101 | 21.8% |
All eyes will be on the Angels over the next two weeks. The Shohei Ohtani question looms over everything they do, and it won’t go away until they trade him or the deadline passes with him still in Anaheim. They managed to climb back into the fringe of the AL playoff picture with a sweep of the Yankees and a series win over the Pirates last week. Mickey Moniak is trying to do his best Mike Trout impression while the latter is sidelined with a hand injury, but that might not be enough to get them over the hump.
The Reds and Brewers played six straight games against each other with the All-Star break sandwiched in the middle; Milwaukee walked away with five victories and reclaimed the lead in the NL Central. Cincinnati responded by winning five of its last seven against direct competitors in the NL Wild Card race. The Reds have got three more games in Milwaukee on tap this week followed by a three-game set in Los Angeles against the red-hot Dodgers.
The Guardians ended the first half of the season a half-game ahead of the Twins in the AL Central. That lead has been quickly erased, with Minnesota winning eight of its ten games after the midseason break as Cleveland has gone 4–5. An ugly sweep by the Rangers two weekends ago was the low point, but the Guardians have won back-to-back series and haven’t fallen out of the running in the division yet. Unfortunately, Shane Bieber hit the IL with an elbow injury, joining Triston McKenzie and Cal Quantrill on the shelf. Their stable of young rookie starters will have to lead the way now.
Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cardinals | 44-56 | -4 | 110 | 107 | 103 | -8 | 104 | 5.4% |
Mets | 46-53 | -2 | 102 | 109 | 108 | -6 | 70 | 14.0% |
Pirates | 43-56 | 1 | 89 | 104 | 103 | 0 | 63 | 0.3% |
Tigers | 45-54 | 5 | 86 | 105 | 100 | 4 | 58 | 1.6% |
Like the Padres, the Mets are quickly running out of time to get back into the playoff picture. They’re not even on the fringe right now like San Diego is, and they don’t have the solid underlying production to give them hope for a turnaround. Justin Verlander and Max Scherzer aren’t carrying the load for the rotation, and it’s clear that Edwin Díaz’s absence has hurt the bullpen more than expected. There aren’t that many pieces they can sell off at this point, and too many of their aging stars are locked into huge long-term contracts. Of all the teams in this tier, they’re the one that’s truly stuck in no man’s land.
Team | Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nationals | 41-58 | 0 | 95 | 106 | 122 | -1 | 57 | 0.0% |
White Sox | 41-60 | -2 | 88 | 107 | 109 | -10 | 32 | 0.2% |
Royals | 28-73 | -6 | 81 | 117 | 110 | 16 | 51 | 0.0% |
Rockies | 39-60 | 2 | 79 | 124 | 95 | -13 | 28 | 0.0% |
Athletics | 28-74 | 0 | 89 | 138 | 129 | -10 | 17 | 0.0% |
After getting swept by the Twins over the weekend, whatever slim hopes the White Sox had in climbing back into the AL playoff picture were pretty much dashed. Outside of the Angels or possibly the Padres, they have the biggest names that might be on the move at the trade deadline. Unfortunately, many of those big name players are struggling mightily this year, putting a damper on whatever return they might fetch in a trade.
The Nationals made their mark on the NL Wild Card race last weekend, outscoring the Giants 21–5 on their way to a three-game sweep. You can be sure that Jeimer Candelario will be on the move in a couple of weeks to the contender with the biggest hole at third base. There are enough talented youngsters on the Nats’ roster that they’ll likely continue to play spoiler down the stretch.
…
Rank | Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | Δ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Braves | 64-34 | 1 | 120 | 92 | 83 | -8 | 159 | 100.0% | 0 |
2 | Rangers | 59-41 | -4 | 121 | 93 | 103 | 14 | 165 | 82.9% | 1 |
3 | Rays | 61-42 | -5 | 119 | 87 | 100 | 9 | 163 | 94.2% | -1 |
4 | Dodgers | 57-41 | -1 | 115 | 101 | 95 | -1 | 139 | 97.5% | 3 |
5 | Orioles | 61-38 | 7 | 105 | 102 | 87 | -9 | 116 | 88.0% | 3 |
6 | Blue Jays | 55-45 | 1 | 108 | 93 | 88 | -2 | 147 | 70.9% | -2 |
7 | Astros | 56-44 | 0 | 102 | 94 | 95 | 7 | 128 | 70.2% | -2 |
8 | Twins | 53-48 | -2 | 102 | 85 | 90 | -8 | 129 | 78.2% | 8 |
9 | Diamondbacks | 54-46 | 3 | 103 | 104 | 102 | 15 | 119 | 51.5% | -3 |
10 | Giants | 54-46 | 2 | 98 | 100 | 92 | 7 | 110 | 60.5% | -1 |
11 | Mariners | 50-49 | -2 | 100 | 94 | 93 | 12 | 131 | 14.7% | -1 |
12 | Padres | 48-52 | -8 | 103 | 88 | 102 | 16 | 146 | 35.9% | -1 |
13 | Red Sox | 53-47 | -1 | 107 | 106 | 92 | -33 | 100 | 28.3% | 4 |
14 | Angels | 51-49 | -1 | 114 | 103 | 104 | -3 | 114 | 13.9% | 1 |
15 | Phillies | 53-46 | 3 | 98 | 90 | 94 | -4 | 105 | 65.4% | -2 |
16 | Brewers | 55-45 | 6 | 87 | 97 | 91 | 12 | 91 | 72.0% | 3 |
17 | Cubs | 48-51 | -6 | 101 | 96 | 95 | 4 | 115 | 13.1% | 3 |
18 | Yankees | 53-47 | 1 | 96 | 105 | 88 | 4 | 97 | 35.1% | -4 |
19 | Marlins | 54-47 | 6 | 98 | 92 | 99 | -10 | 82 | 48.0% | -7 |
20 | Reds | 55-46 | 5 | 98 | 109 | 93 | -9 | 63 | 36.6% | -2 |
21 | Guardians | 49-50 | 0 | 92 | 94 | 92 | 2 | 101 | 21.8% | 0 |
22 | Cardinals | 44-56 | -4 | 110 | 107 | 103 | -8 | 104 | 5.4% | 0 |
23 | Mets | 46-53 | -2 | 102 | 109 | 108 | -6 | 70 | 14.0% | 0 |
24 | Pirates | 43-56 | 1 | 89 | 104 | 103 | 0 | 63 | 0.3% | 0 |
25 | Tigers | 45-54 | 5 | 86 | 105 | 100 | 4 | 58 | 1.6% | 0 |
26 | Nationals | 41-58 | 0 | 95 | 106 | 122 | -1 | 57 | 0.0% | 0 |
27 | White Sox | 41-60 | -2 | 88 | 107 | 109 | -10 | 32 | 0.2% | 0 |
28 | Royals | 28-73 | -6 | 81 | 117 | 110 | 16 | 51 | 0.0% | 0 |
29 | Rockies | 39-60 | 2 | 79 | 124 | 95 | -13 | 28 | 0.0% | 0 |
30 | Athletics | 28-74 | 0 | 89 | 138 | 129 | -10 | 17 | 0.0% | 0 |
Jake Mailhot is a contributor to FanGraphs. A long-suffering Mariners fan, he also writes about them for Lookout Landing. Follow him on BlueSky @jakemailhot.
Okay, the Orioles are really starting to get on my nerves. When is the regression coming? I’ve been waiting since the second half of last year and it still hasn’t come. How did they just magically flip the script and become the 2nd best team (record wise) in baseball? They’re much improved of course, but on paper, there should be several teams ahead of them (and yes, I’m an annoyed fan of one of those teams).
I know this comment is offered somewhat in jest, but I feel this is actually a common mistake that a lot of writers and analysts make with rebuilding teams. Group think takes over so all you hear is how x or y team won’t hit their next window of contention for 5 or 6 years. When the timeline and pieces come together perfectly, that window always seems to open a year earlier than anyone expected. That’s where the O’s are. Even this year, when they’ve been in contention from the get go, I still feel like the media’s been sleeping on them. On paper, maybe they didn’t look as strong as some other contenders early on, but they had a farm system with 5 or 6 impact prospects that could (and did) bolster the roster throughout the year. That’s maybe a factor that isn’t given enough credit in preseason analysis and, especially, projections.
I know Eric says this like constantly but guys PLAYER DEVELOPMENT IS NONLINEAR. That also means rebuilds are nonlinear! Sometimes they click early, sometimes late, sometimes not at all
Also, sometimes they will click early, seem like they arrived ahead of schedule, then regress the following season before getting back on track. In the last half-decade or so both the Padres and White Sox did versions of that.
The Orioles have hit faster than expected because some guys have moved faster than expected so they hit critical mass sooner. That doesn’t mean they won’t hit a bump of some kind, either.
Like everything else in baseball analysis, all you can do is consider probabilities. And even when something happens faster or more strongly than expected, the possibility of a bump in the road hasn’t been removed. There’s reasons why the Orioles are probably both lucky and good right now; if those things bite them for a while, they’ll look weaker than they actually are.
Also a truism I’m starting to adopt in baseball is that in about 85% of baseball games, the team that loses looks worse than it is and the team that wins looks better than it is. Closely-fought games where both teams look good are pretty rare, even if they are (I just watched the Dodgers thump 2/3 against both the Orioles and Rangers, and neither TEX or BAL looked very good in them .. but you usually don’t look good when you’re losing, just like the Dodgers looked bad in both games they lost)
Rebuilds seem to always come either early or not at all.
As an Orioles fan, I have no idea. Even our vaunted bullpen is essentially just Bautista, and that one month of Cano doing all the heavy lifting. The rest of it is average or worse.
Seconded. Along with the Rangers FA black magic I refuse to believe this is how the full season plays out.
The regression isn’t coming. They had some starters that were awful that skewed the run differential. That has largely been corrected. Their backend of the bullpen is lights out which can explain some “luck.”. Finally, the young players are only going to improve. Henderson, Cowser, Westburg, and Rodriguez will get better not worse. So, yes there was likely some luck in the past, but the team is much better now than it was in April or May. At a certain point you have to look at the results especially against the best teams. They are well over .500 against the AL East. They have a winning record vs the Rays. They haven’t been swept once this year. And they have great records not only at home but on the road.
How come I don’t see the name of the most important part of the renaissance mentioned? It all began on 05/21/2022 when Adley Rutschman made his first appearance in an Orioles uniform. The future is almost comparable to what Braves’ fans can look forward to over the next several years which isn’t good for my Red Sox.
Its a little optimistic overall, because there’s not actually a guarantee that the young players will only improve – in fact its fairly normal for young players who show up and are immediately outstanding to hit a doldrum at some point when the league finally figures out a good way to attack them and they have to adapt for the first time (and in some cases, they fail to adapt at all). It’s just not a lock that all those good young talented players will keep getting better – some of them will stay as good as they are, and some of them will never be as good as they are in their first few months to a year in the bigs.
Young *stars* tend to stay good. The Sotos, Acunas, and so forth. But many guys who look like stars for a few months to a year don’t continue to look like that, and some of them don’t even stay major leaguers once the league finds a way to attack them successfully (Think Yasiel Puig, or Aristedes Aquino). And we can mostly only tell those two groups apart in retrospect (with some allowance for age at debut, where guys like Acuna and Soto were barely 20 and very few non-stars can perform at that age)
I don’t think I ever saw Aristedes Aquino being touted as a future star, or even a major leaguer. Most of these Oriole prospects are very highly valued and the sheer number of young players that are performing very well throughout their system should, given a reasonable amount of luck, produce several well above average major league players. Did anyone predict in the spring of 2022 that the Orioles, a team that lost 110 games in 2021, would be leading the toughest division in baseball on July 24, 2023. What the Birds have accomplished is spectacular and the future looks undeniably bright but there will there be bumps and potholes, That, in no way, should lessen the smile across the face of every Orioles fan.
A month ago their luck was +6 and this time it’s +7 (14-9 in this stretch). So only +1 in the past month. Not an Orioles fan but from the surface level seems to be that their luck is not continuing, but it’s also not going the other way (bad luck) and team is getting better which one can reasonably expect from a young team.
There’s a common saying concerning markets that they can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. Something similar could be said with respect to expected regression in the context of a single baseball season.
This is it. You would not expect this over 162 games. But there are 30 teams in baseball and every year brings a fresh 30 opportunities for this to happen. So every now and again you get something like this. It just happens.
The O’s have been doing this since June 2022, which is over 200 games. At some point, the logical thing would be to say that it isn’t just luck and they probably are pretty good, even if they may not be second best in the AL. Their run differential this year is essentially the same as the Astros.
I have had this debate with several Brewers and Rays fans who are convinced that their teams are beating their run differential with…a killer bullpen? Shifting? Depth? It depends on the conversation. But the record of teams beating their run differential over and over again is not good.
In this case, the Orioles BaseRuns record is 51-48 and their Pythagorean record is 54-45. It isn’t one thing. They’ve been good sequencing luck on offense, and then they’ve been having good luck with the distribution of runs in the games themselves.
This is unusual, but it’s not unheard of. This stuff happens every so often. In 2021, the Mariners beat their BaseRuns and Pythagorean by +16 and +14, respectively. They also beat it pretty convincingly in 2019, but had a more expected result in 2022 and are actually slightly underperforming this year.
The Rangers overperformed by +13 in both BaseRuns and run differential in 2016, and if you’ve been following the Rangers in the subsequent years you’ll see that they couldn’t keep that up.
I wouldn’t predict that it will continue, but if it does? This stuff happens.
Fair enough. I am a cautiously optimistic O’s fan. I recognize the team’s limitations. On the other hand, I am also aware that they have been doing this for nearly 4 months this year, and also for the last 4 months last year. That’s why I said 200 games.
Do I have any idea what could be helping the Os outperform the models for 8 straight months? Not really. It likely is luck to a significant degree (although that explanation has to give way at some point). But, the odds of it being something else are increasing.
One thing that probably helps, like some of the comments below observe, is being pretty good at almost every position. That does seem to produce consistently good results over time, perhaps better than expected. Or, perhaps, as noted above, it is something Adley Rutschman is doing (maybe being absurdly good at pitch calling?)..
There are always cases where the modeling doesn’t capture everything. For example, as FanGraphs demonstrated very well a number of years ago, team ERA generally does not substantially overperform FIP consistently. It’s a strong part of the argument for FIP. There are outliers, however. Sticking with my favorite team, by sheer coincidence, the O’s team ERA was an average of nearly half a run better than team FIP from the mid-1960s into the mid-1980s. Almost unheard of. But, in retrospect, also kind of understandable–their fielding, particularly in the infield, was that good.
What you’re talking about is the projections for individual players being wrong. It is entirely possible that these guys are much better than the projections give them credit for. In that case we would expect their team wRC+ to be higher or opponents’ wRC+ to be lower.
That’s different than beating your BaseRuns record by 10 games. BaseRuns isn’t a projection, it is a retrospective measure. It tells us that the Orioles have way outperformed their own wRC+ and that of their opponents’.
That is an interesting point. I think I understand what you are saying, and I surely understand the feeling you are expressing.
Even as an O’s fan, it is very clear they are not a .600 team. Their run differential is that of a .550 team (about the same as the Blue Jays and Red Sox). Further, you and others are pointing out that the O’s actual on-field performance would ordinarily be expected to produce a .520 team according to the Base Runs model. That would still be good, and notably better than last year, but it would be last in the AL East. I get it and I recognize the model producing that projection has been pretty strongly supported by a large body of evidence.
The O’s were the luckiest team in baseball last year (tied with two others). I don’t know where to find Base Runs for prior seasons, but I am willing to be the O’s also exceeded it rather handily last year.
The O’s are the luckiest team in baseball again this year. And, they have an absurd record in one-run games (although they were essentially neutral last year). A quick glance at the past 5+ years shows it is unusual to be so lucky, but it wouldn’t be unexpected. Milwaukee and Seattle were both among the luckiest teams multiple times over that period.
The only thing I am saying is that the longer this goes on, the harder it will be to chalk it up to just luck. For example, the O’s were one of the two unluckiest teams in baseball in 2018, 2019, and 2020. I think it is possible that that wasn’t all bad luck but, rather, some additional element of badness that isn’t captured by the Pythagorean model.
Similarly, if the O’s keep exceeding their Pythagorean and Base Runs projections over the next two months, it might be time to question whether we are missing something. And, it would become even more likely if the O’s continue to outperform next year as well. I know it probably won’t happen (although I’d be happy if it did).
Looking at their actual results so far, and adjusting for sequencing and run differential, and the Orioles look like a .500ish team.
Fangraphs depth charts see the Orioles as a slightly below .500 team going forward, and Zips is a little higher on them, but has them at slightly >.500, per Szym’s all-star update article.
The fact that they are actually a .600 team is definitely somewhat related to luck, but some of it may not be.
Outperforming projections:
Os have the best AAA team stacked with both vets and prospects – they are effective at cycling guys up and down and given they are drawing from such a deep bench they are more likely to hit on the guys hitting their 75% projections in a year than a team with a thinner crop.
This depth has also allowed them to better weather injuries.
Os have a deep bench allowing effective platoons – they have platoon advantage in almost 70% of PA this year, which leads the majors.
Outperforming run differential:
Back-end of bullpen has been elite
Luck:
Sequencing, fewer injuries, guys just temporarily outperforming their true talent level.
Absent patent absurdities like the 2019-2022 Dodgers (who averaged 108 wins and under-performed their expected record doing it), it is worth remembering that the teams getting the best results in baseball at any given time are typically the good to great teams that are also the luckiest in that timeframe, from in-game sequencing to injury luck (both theirs and their opponents’). That’s why basically every team you’ve ever seen (except those Dodgers) exceed 105 wins or so has has over-performed their pythag expected record, and so on.
This is also true in the postseason – the World Series is won by the good playoff team who has the best luck in the playoffs. The opponent’s best player gets hurt. A guy who has been a league-average hitter for 10 years suddenly spends 2 weeks being Mike Trout. Those things decide who wins playoff series much more than the talent levels of the teams involved (which are never that disparate)
Because when everyone is good, in a game where there’s a lot of factors you cannot control, how those things shake down ends up being quite influential on the outcome.
They actually have a good amount of depth. They do a ton of matchup platoons and there aren’t many true offensive holes in the lineup. They‘re also fortunate that Ryan O’Hearn has suddenly been great filling in for Mountcastle.
You can win a lot of games if almost everyone is Pretty Good
You can win a lot of games if almost everyone is Pretty Good
I imagine there’s a plaque with this adage on it in the Rays front office
Even more than that. it’s literally the Cardinal Way
Perhaps, but the Rays do it 65% less insufferably 😀
I think the difference with the Rays is that while they certainly churn out some nice players, where they really excel is in taking some really limited players with one or two standout skills and finding a way to use them that maximizes that while minimizing their chance for their weaknesses to be exploited.
The Rays produce 50-55 type players, but also find ways to use 40 and 45 type players in limited roles that allow them to provide 50-55 type value in very restricted circumstances, and don’t water that down by trying to let those guys establish themselves as more rounded players by giving them any opportunities outside of their best-case scenarios.
The regression isn’t coming if they remain healthy. They are young, hungry, talented, lucky and keep improving with experience – in my mind, the metrics here continue to underrate them.
They are legit World Series contenders, if not AL favorites. They are going to make your life miserable (I say in jest) for a long time….