Felipe Rivero Is Nearing the Elite
The Pirates’ trade of Proven Closer Mark Melancon prior to last season’s trade deadline was met with much hostility at the confluence of the Allegheny, Monongahela, and Ohio Rivers. The trade was seen in the public, and some corners of the clubhouse, as a white flag being raised, the Jolly Roger lowered at PNC Park. The Pirates remained on the fringe of the postseason picture at the time of the deal. Melancon had been a fixture of the 2013-15 playoff teams.
But those who aren’t focused solely on the Stanley Cup finals are no longer complaining in Pittsburgh. In return for Melancon, the Pirates acquired pitching prospect Taylor Hearn and a headline piece in Felipe Rivero, who is becoming one of the game’s elite left-handed relief pitchers.
We know all about the talents of Zach Britton, Aroldis Chapman, Andrew Miller, the sport’s most dominant left-handed relievers. But Rivero is on the brink of joining their company. And if you’re interested in who’s occupying the ninth inning for major-league clubs — say, fantasy baseball purposes — Rivero might soon be closing games for the Pirates due to Tony Watson’s struggles.
Oh, how the Washington Nationals would like to have Rivero and his four-plus seasons of control back. As we inch closer to the trade deadline, the Rivero deal serves both as a model and warning in how to operate at the trade deadline, where overpaying is almost always a mistake and heeding the lessons of the Stanford marshmallow experiment is typically wise.
To be fair, the Nationals didn’t think they were trading this kind of arm away for 60-plus days of control over Melancon. Like many pitchers before him — A.J. Burnett, Jason Grilli, Francisco Liriano, Ivan Nova, Edinson Volquez, and, yes, Melancon himself — Rivero has made significant improvements since being traded to Pittsburgh.
Let me offer a quick a synopsis on the Rivero story: the lefty has refined his command since arriving in Pittsburgh, he’s added velocity — hitting 102 mph this season — and, in addition to a quality slider, he now boasts an elite changeup.
He’s trimmed his walk percentage from 10.1% with the Nationals and Pirates last year to 5.2% this year.
Met’s play-by-play man Gary Cohen called the fastest pitch of Rivero’s career “Chapman like” earlier this season during an at-bat when poor Michael Conforto saw five 100-plus fastballs:
And that is 102 located at the knees. Rivero’s fastball ranks sixth in average velocity (98.4 mph) among relievers (at least 200 thrown).
His slider has been a ground-ball tool, with a 7-to-1 GB:FB ratio,a figure which ranks seventh among relievers (at least 50 thrown) and is fueling his 63% ground-ball rate, though it can also be a strikeout weapon:
He’s also getting plenty of miss in and out of the zone. His changeup ranks ninth in whiffs/swing (46.55%) among relievers.
More velocity, better control, a ground-ball pitch, and a bat-missing changeup are the ingredients for a dominant WPA-boosting arm in whatever role he is used.
Let’s consider this sequence against Manny Machado.
Good morning (changeup):
Good afternoon (changeup):
Good night (elevated 100 mph fastball):
The Nationals are probably wondering where that changeup came from, since he rarely threw it during his time in the organization. Dave Sheinin investigated the pitch for the Washington Post.
“Never,” Pirates pitching coach Ray Searage said when asked whether he’d ever seen a better change-up. “Yeah, never. The arm action looks like a fastball, and then it comes in about 10 miles per hour slower than the fastball, with movement. It’s amazing. He’s just blessed.”
What’s encouraging for the Pirates is Rivero can get misses out of the zone and is also effective in the zone.
As Jeff Sullivan noted in February, Rivero had an excellent combination of pitching in the zone and limiting contact. Rivero owns the 17th-highest zone percentage (53.8%) among relievers, and the 40th-lowest zone-contact percentage. That is indeed a good combination.
While some have been curious to see what Chapman or Miller could do in a major-league rotation — could either be something close to reincarnation of Randy Johnson? — Rivera actually has more of a starter kit, with three plus pitches and excellent command.
While Rivero has been great — as his 0.90 ERA and 2.59 FIP indicate — there,s also room to grow. He could increase his 34th ranked K-BB (22.8%) by less often throwing his fastball (56.7%) and more often throwing his changeup (23.7%). And Rivero has increased his changeup usage from 5.0% in 2015, to 21.2% last season to 23.7% this season.
He has the skill set of a starter, and he’s also mixing pitchers like most starters. But perhaps he should begin to lean on his changeup like Miller leans on his slider, like Britton leans on his sinker.
Rivero is already very good, with room to grow. The only debate in Pittsburgh now is if Rivero should pitch the ninth or to be used in high-leverage situations whenever they occur, like Miller is being deployed in Cleveland. And it is Rivero who has the skill set to become the Miller of the National League.
A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.
“To be fair, the Nationals didn’t think they were trading this kind of arm away”
Same with Nick Pivetta. His write up at the time of the Papelbon deal made him a temporary call up guy at best. Now he’s throwing Vince Velasquez stuff.
Same with Robbie Ray. Nats have had a lot of these mid-tier arms blossom quite a lot after being traded.
Also Brad Peacock.
If Alex Meyer and Tommy Milone suddenly become amazing I am gonna really freak out
Is the nationals coaching staff up to something
Robbie ray has been killing it with only 2 runs in 5 straight games w/ almost 10ks a start
I liked the trade at the time and I’m not sure anyone should be surprised at this outcome. This was a guy who could hit 100 mph as a lefty, had two good secondary pitches (he was already throwing a changeup with the Nats according to Pitchf/x), high K with manageable walk rate, and already established respectable results at the MLB level. It was always quite clear that the Pirates would reap positive from the deal very quickly.
Also: The Pirates have Ray Searage. You got a flawed pitcher with lots of talent? Send him to the Pirates and watch him become a lights-out thrower. Makes me think Tyler Glasnow is never going to make it.
I’ve been pondering this same point.
Are you an OK level major league pitcher with good stuff? Then Pittsburgh is the place to be – Searage has been better than anyone at finding the great pitcher inside you, often almost immediately after you arrive.
Are you a pitching prospect with good stuff and a good, but imperfect, track record in AAA? Well, then, the record is less awesome. Cole is not an ace, and shows no signs of imminently becoming one. Glasnow… the less I say there the better for now.
Yes, Taillon’s performance so far has been good, and (temporarily forgetting baseball) his willingness to discuss his cancer makes him a great guy to root for. That is one count against my argument.
I know that you have to be patient with pitching prospects, but Searage’s utterly amazing performance with veterans leaves me a bit spoiled…
Would not be surprised if there was a trade to bring Rivero back to Washington.
Nats ended up with Enny Romero… ceiling is about the same. Rivero had some “blips” last year that may have left doubts as to whether he would be fit and reliable for the 2016 postseason push. I’m sure the Nets were torn on the move, but in no way is this as stupid as the Papelbon trade.
Really pisses me off the clubs hold guys like this back to stunt their salary. Can’t imagine how I would feel if I were the player. I probably would not feel very loyal.
Yeah I would push back on the idea that the Nationals didn’t realize what they were giving up at the time. I remember most people considering Rivero a top young bullpen arm who lots of people expected to be this good long term. He has improved obviously, but I think there was some expectation that he could get better command and such as he was still a young pitcher
The Nationals probably knew, but I don’t think the fans would. If you scroll back to comments at the time, *everyone* thought the Nationals had totally fleeced the Pirates because the Yankees were getting huge packages of prospects and the Pirates got a possible reliever with control problems. I still don’t think it was a bad trade based on what everyone knew at the time, but it also wasn’t even close to the steal everyone thought it was.
Reminds me of the Joe Blanton articles last year. I think he was “super elite” though…
Good timing, Travis. Rivero and Nicasio now a closer platoon while Watson tries to figure things out in lower leverage situations.
Now, I don’t want to go on a rant here (or a tangent), but…
It’s a pet peeve of mine that there’s this repeated mantra that Andrew Miller is actively not used as a closer to instead be saved to be used in “high leverage” situations. Any yeah, he does pitch in some high leverage situations. But his usage is essentially that of a set-up man. He sets up Cody Allen. If he was really all about high leverage, why does Miller pitch the ninth occasionally? There’s also sometimes the repeated myth that Miller is a multi-inning guy. Except he hasn’t thrown 2 innings once this year (and only 4 times last season excluding playoffs, all exactly 2 innings). So there’s a lot of myths of what Andrew Miller is. And people want to create storylines. Instead, he’s essentially a set-up guy. He’s obviously a very good pitcher, but people act like he’d broken some magical new ground, when there’s really little evidence that separates him from say Dellin Betances. Most teams don’t have pitchers as good as Betances or Miller. But in the end, they’re just really good set up men.
An let’s be honest here. It’s not like Cleveland actively doesn’t use Miller to close in some super genius plot to maximize reliever usage. They have a very good closer in Cody Allen. Not quite Miller good, but quite good overall. And he’s been with the team for quite some time. So his manager showed loyalty to his closer and kept Allen in the 9th despite the fact Miller is better. Managers tend to show loyalty to their closers, rarely demoting guys that haven’t “lost” their jobs. Any particularly to guys that have success over multiple seasons.
And particularly when the alternative is a newbie that came to the team five minutes ago and frankly has little experience closing. That’s pretty much all this is. A bit of loyalty mixed with the fact Cody Allen is pretty darn good.
And yet somehow this sequence of events has sparked repeated claims that teams are now considering radically changing their bullpen usage. I really haven’t seen any sustained evidence that this exists. When Craig Kimbrel starts pitching in the 7th inning against the heart of the line up with bases loaded rather than locking down the 9th with bases empty against the 7-8-9 hitters, maybe I’ll believe otherwise. But, to date, nothing’s really changed. Which is why I expect Rivero will now close (had to bring this back to Rivero eventually)
Lots of salty nats fans here.
Thanks for another great article from Fangraphs, Travis. I picked up Rivero very early, and have been happily enjoying his contributions since. I have watched him pitch quite a lot and his stuff is absolutely filthy, and those numbers speak for themselves, but it’s always nice to read a sound, in depth discussion on everything around the success so far. He has now converted his first two save opportunities, both 4-out occasions, and I believe he can run away with the job.