Five Things I Liked (Or Didn’t Like) This Week, April 21

Troy Taormina-USA TODAY Sports

Welcome back to another installment of five things that caught my attention in baseball this week. Stop me if you’ve heard this before, but I got the idea from the estimable Zach Lowe, who writes a similar column about basketball every week that I absolutely love. Now that the sugar rush of home openers and new players is starting to wear off, we’re into the grind of the regular season.

But the grind of the regular season is awesome. There’s so much going on, all the time, that there’s always something worth paying attention to. It’s just a matter of keeping your eyes open – and watching an ungodly amount of baseball, of course, which is the best part of my job.

1. Government Catcher Overreach
Nobody likes to be interfered with when they’re at work. I can’t stand it when it’s noisy outside, or when my internet is on the fritz. I don’t even like it when someone buzzes into my apartment when I’m mid-paragraph. I’m busy here! Leave me alone. Baseball players are made of hardier stuff than I am, though; they have their fair share of over-served fans and over-zealous hecklers on their case every day at work and seem to deal with it just fine.

That’s all indirect interference, though. Imagine how you’d feel if the long arm glove of the law Matt Thaiss kept you from doing what you wanted to. Last Saturday, two Boston hitters had that very experience. It all started with a foul bunt. Raimel Tapia was trying to advance the runner on first with the Red Sox trailing by a run in the bottom of the eighth, but he couldn’t do it. After a foul bunt, he swung away and fouled off another ball to reach 0-2. Then he lofted a fly ball to left that Tyler Wade Taylor Ward flagged down just shy of the Monster:

But wait! Watch that replay again, and you can see umpire Cory Blaser gesturing animatedly just before the camera pans to follow the ball. He was calling catcher’s interference; Tapia went to first automatically. The replay showed that Thaiss was far enough forward that he caught Tapia’s bat before Tapia made contact:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

That put the Angels in hot water. After Ryan Tepera struck out Triston Casas, he faced Reese McGuire. On 1-0, McGuire swung at a juicy changeup, and, well:

Again! This one was even more obvious than the first, particularly in slow motion:

The Angels didn’t so much as complain on that one. Both runners who were interfered with scored, and they provided the two-run margin of victory for Boston. Hey, sometimes getting interfered with isn’t so bad – just so long as big government Cory Blaser is there to provide restitution.

2. The Roller Coaster Red Sox
That game ended in a Boston victory, but like so much about the team this year, it was anything but simple. The Red Sox are 10-10, but that .500 mark doesn’t reflect how it feels to watch one of their games. You’re just as likely to see a spectacular play or a rollicking comeback as you are a gaffe or decisive loss. Sometimes you’ll see both in the same game! Check out this spectacular defensive play by Enrique Hernández:

That’s Superman stuff right there. Not many shortstops make this throw, and fewer still make it look so pretty:

Stick around, though, and you might see him stand flat-footed while a grounder skips right past him, thanks to a shockingly poor read off the bat:

No team has committed more errors that the Red Sox this year. They’ve made their fair share of spectacular plays, too, though. Overall, Statcast rates them as the 20th-best defense, closer to the middle of the pack than the bottom. Their hitters have mimicked those highs and lows. Masataka Yoshida is off to a glacial start, but Alex Verdugo is mashing. Adam Duvall was on fire until he got hurt. That’s normal this early in the year, but it somehow feels exacerbated in Boston.

It’s not just individual performances: their games are filled with peaks and valleys, with oddball circumstances around every corner. That catcher’s interference game was obviously strange. Their annual Patriot’s Day game featured copious rain delays, a heroic 6.1 inning relief appearance by Kutter Crawford, and a furious ninth-inning rally that fell just short. That’s just business as usual these days in Boston, where weird is normal.

Victories are slugfests. Defeats might be 1-0 nail-biters or 10-4 blowouts. Indeed, 10-4 was the final count on Wednesday in their loss against Minnesota, but despite the lopsided score, the Sox managed to load the bases with no one out in the ninth inning to make things interesting. They came back the next day and won 11-5 while letting the Twins load the bases in the ninth themselves, keeping the alternating cycle of highs and lows going. Even their walk-off celebrations are strange. Their Tuesday victory had to be reviewed, which meant a bunch of awkward milling about waiting for an umpire to listen to someone in another state:

And then, of course, an umpire talking juxtaposed with an on-field party:

Thus far, the twisting path has left the team in last place in the competitive AL East despite a decent record. I know I’ll be tuning in to see if they can turn things around. If nothing else, their season so far suggests that they’ll be an entertaining watch. Just don’t forget to pack some Tums.

3. Travis Jankowski, Bunt Bully
After an exuberant opening weekend, the Rangers offense has been up and down. They’ve put up 48 runs in six games against the Royals, but have struggled aside from those two series. Corey Seager’s injury certainly didn’t help; every offense looks worse when you take away its best hitter. And they weren’t a deep unit to begin with, which is how you end up with Travis Jankowski, who signed a minor league contract with Texas this offseason, batting second for a playoff contender.

In the long run, Jankowski is miscast in that spot. He came into the year with a career 77 wRC+ in more than a thousand plate appearances. His career line doesn’t look like a fluke; he doesn’t hit for enough power or reach base at a high enough clip to make the whole package hum. But when the Rangers have needed him most, he’s put up the best stretch of his career.

In 36 plate appearances, Jankowski is hitting .300/.400/.467. He’s not doing it with home runs – he hasn’t hit one this year. He still has gap-to-gap power, though, and hey, when you’re hot, you’re hot. Take a look at this perfectly placed double:

Saying this is all a hot streak doesn’t give Jankowski enough credit. He’s making his own luck, too. Here’s the first play of Monday’s Royals-Rangers tilt:

Sure, he’s not Seager, but Jankowski saw an opening in Hunter Dozier’s errant throw. On the first pitch, he pounced, in his own way:

It might not look like much, but I love this play. No one on the field was less interested in making a tricky fielding play than Dozier. It’s likely that no one was more in their own head than Dozier. Finally, c’mon, he’s Travis Jankowski! A sacrifice bunt wasn’t the end of the world in this situation, even if Dozier rose to the occasion.

In the long run, Jankowski isn’t going to deliver top-of-lineup production. So what? For a depth-strapped team like the Rangers to make a playoff run, they need either perfect health or contributions from unexpected places. The first has predictably eluded them, but Jankowski is handling the second part for now.

4. Jeremy Peña Loves Free Bases
Jeremy Peña can absolutely fly, but he didn’t show it last year in the majors. Despite playing the entire season, he swiped only 11 bags. He was only caught twice, and he racked up solid baserunning value overall, but steals simply didn’t look like a big part of what he brought to the table.

As it turns out, all he needed was a sea change in the rules, a change that has unleashed a flood of newly-minted base stealers. Peña is a member of that group; give him a walking lead and keep pitchers from checking in on him too closely, and he’ll take off with the best of them.

That’s nothing special in go-go 2023, but I enjoyed Peña’s three stolen bases on Sunday so much that I had to write about them. To start things off, he vacuumed up a freebie against Andrew Heaney in the bottom of the second inning:

Heaney hadn’t thrown over this entire plate appearance, and Peña hadn’t even bluffed going. When Heaney glanced over at first and then back to the plate, though, it was all systems go. That was the first time that Heaney had glanced back at first base after coming set all plate appearance. When that glance didn’t end in a throw, Peña was off to the races:

That’s all on Heaney if you want to assign blame, or all down to Peña’s observational skills if you’re into handing out credit. But Peña took things up a notch in the fourth inning. He reached base after being hit in the toe, which you’d think would curtail any extracurricular activities. You’d be wrong, though, because Peña came up running. Same glance-and-reset action by Heaney, same result:

I’m not going to bother showing the reverse angle, because it was identical to the first. Heaney got taken for a ride, more or less, and Jonah Heim didn’t have much of a chance. Two stolen bases off of the same lefty starter, while he’s staring you right in the face? That’s good living. But if two is good, can I interest you in three? Here’s the next pitch:

Oof. Heim didn’t even attempt a throw there, which was a good decision; all he could have done was throw the ball into left field. Heaney probably wasn’t thinking much about the runner – third base isn’t particularly important when there are already two outs – but that was so easy for Peña that he almost had no choice but to take it.

There’s probably some breakeven point past which stolen bases will feel tiresome. Pitchers haven’t come up with a counter yet; we’re holding steady around 1.4 steals per game this season, with a success rate over 80%. Too much of a good thing can be bad. I’m not there yet, though, particularly when it’s fun young players doing the stealing. Pitchers, don’t let your guard down: Jeremy Peña is liable to pick up a read and steal three bases off of you.

5. Steals Aren’t Automatic
Okay, fine, I just spent a whole section talking about how steals feel automatic this year. Don’t tell the Brewers that, though. Milwaukee has been pressing the issue early and often, with seven players combining for 15 steals, 10th-most in baseball. They’ve done it with a combination of classic steals and choreographed plays. How’s their success rate? Let’s just say it’s not 100%. I had to reach back before this week to find the best evidence of it, but I think it’s worth it.

The classic little league play, a delayed steal of second base with the runner on third bolting home as the catcher throws down, is a questionable decision in a major league game in the first place. That play works a lot better when you try it against 11-year-olds instead of big leaguers, never mind a major league infield jam-packed with Gold Glovers and anchored by a catcher with a well-earned reputation for controlling the running game. The Brewers tried it against the Cardinals, and it didn’t work like you draw it up at home:

Pitchers are handing out steals like candy this year. Jordan Hicks isn’t exactly the hardest pitcher to steal on, and he’s also liable to throw a wild pitch at any second. If Brian Anderson took off normally, he probably would have stolen the base without a throw. But he wasn’t trying a straight steal. He was trying to bait a defensive miscue, and Willson Contreras wasn’t having any of it.

That play wasn’t particularly close to scoring a run. Contreras took his time looking Garrett Mitchell back to third, and the play doesn’t work if Mitchell can’t bolt for home right away. In theory, Contreras taking his time there should have given Anderson a chance to take second easily, but the steal was so delayed that Anderson was nowhere near second base even after Contreras held the ball for three seconds.

Sadly, neither broadcast provided an alternate angle of this play – it was a meaningless out in a 4-0 game, after all. That’s a shame, because I really want to know what Anderson was doing out there. Was he having a snack? Was he sitting cross-legged starting at Contreras? Perhaps he was pondering the great mysteries of life. Whatever he was doing, he hung out between first and second base in no man’s land for an interminable amount of time. I’m sure he wanted to draw a throw, but at some point you have to commit to one base or the other.

There’s a lot to like in this GIF, though, even if it doesn’t have the angle I was hoping for. Check out Tommy Edman sneaking a few peeks toward third to make sure the runner isn’t going. Between his vigilance and Contreras’s bluff to third, Mitchell had no shot at coming home. Speaking of bluffs, Contreras’s initial pump fake to second base likely helped to slow Anderson to a halt, even though we can’t see it for sure. Even after Paul Goldschmidt applied the inning-ending tag, he assumed nothing and checked home in case Anderson was ruled safe. The Cardinals get a lot of praise for their fundamental infield defense, and plays like this are a big reason why.

None of that is even my favorite part, though. I can’t stop watching Hicks, crouching and confused out on the mound throughout the play. He thinks a throw is coming to second base, so he ducks and turns. But wait! No baseball. Did it go to third? He peeks over there too, realizes it must still be at home plate, and starts to get out of his crouch – only to see Contreras rise and fire in his direction. Back to the crouch!

That’s all the observations I have time for today, but don’t fret. There’s plenty of baseball on, whenever you want it, all season. It’s even getting warm enough that you might not need a jacket to take in a game in person:





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

36 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Manco
3 years ago

It seems like catchers’ interference happens in bunches, usually in one game. It is enough for me to suspect that there is something off. It makes me wonder if the boxes were painted differently than usual. Or the catchers are having a long arm day.

carterMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Manco

Not that I want to see hitters intentionally hit the catchers mitt, but it is curious to me why it hasn’t been tried more often? I have a suspicion Ellsbury did it on purpose on occasion, but when every single edge in the MLB is being eeked out, it seems surprising to me that teams don’t ask a poor hitter to do it. Not many rhb have swings long enough that it would look natural, but plenty of lefties do.

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
3 years ago

My favorite about Hicks in that GIF is that after the second time he ducked, he decided “Screw this, I’m outta here” and starting running…somewhere. I’m not even sure he knew where he was headed so long as it was not in the middle of the crossfire.

LesVegetables
3 years ago

I know everyone thought the 2023 Red Sox could be either very good or awful but I did not expect them to constantly go back and forth between those 2 throughout every game.

idliaminMember since 2024
3 years ago
Reply to  LesVegetables

It’s sort of a microcosm of Boston’s existence over the last decade or so:

2012: Last place
2013: 1st place, won WS
2014: Last place
2015: Last place
2016: 1st place, lost ALDS
2017: 1st place, lost ALDS
2018: 1st place, won WS
2019: 3rd place
2020: Last place
2021: 2nd place/WC, lost ALCS
2022: Last place

Aside from a stray 3rd place finish in 2019, their seasons since 2012 have been evenly split between either making the postseason or finishing dead last, and they’ve pinballed between those extremes (in either direction) five times—most starkly when they won the World Series in 2013, but finished last the year before AND the year after (are there any other teams that have done that, at least in the divisional era?). So, so weird.

Mahoney
3 years ago
Reply to  idliamin

As a Red Sox fan, I remember envying Marlins fans back in 2003 for the two WS titles they got via the binge-and-purge roster management method. Wish granted lol.

Have to admit, I’d rather go like this than have a consistently middle-of-the-road franchise to watch.

Lanidrac
3 years ago
Reply to  idliamin

The Minnesota Twins finished in last place in the AL West (which was a 7-team division, to boot) in 1990 and then won the 1991 World Series.

1991 was a good year for last place teams in general, as the Braves went from last in the NL West in 1990 to winning the 1991 NL Pennant, while the Cardinals went from last in the NL East in 1990 to 2nd place in 1991. (The Yankees were the other last place team in 1990 but merely finished in 5th place in 1991.)

Last edited 3 years ago by Lanidrac
sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

Hmm, maybe someone should tell the Red Sox that positions are not interchangeable after all, and that your good defensive center fielder who has been a below-average second-baseman since he joined your team shouldn’t play shortstop? Just a thought? Who could have seen this would be a bad idea except (checks notes) absolutely everybody?

At least Alex Verdugo is healthy and seems to be good at baseball again, and Devers is as good as ever. And the bullpen looks good. But if they don’t figure out everything else they’re going to get pasted in that division by the all-star break. A team cannot count on Adam Duvall staying healthy while playing out of position or Reese McGuire outperforming his xwOBA buy 150 points.

Brian ReinhartMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The Red Sox wish they could somehow acquire a good outfielder who could play shortstop in a pinch (checks Dodgers game) oh wait

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Brian Reinhart

Admittedly, I also disagree with the decision to move Betts from a place where he is elite (the outfield) to a place where he is not (second base) on a part-time basis, but it’s still funny. Especially since Vargas’s defense seems to be ahead of his bat.

dangledangleMember since 2024
3 years ago
Reply to  Brian Reinhart

Be still my heart

Mahoney
3 years ago
Reply to  Brian Reinhart

Gulp.

Well, at least they have a mediocre first baseman who “can” play shortstop in a pinch (Dalbec).

AnonMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Hernandez actually has a 6.9 UZR/150 at SS for his career which is weird for a guy with a -5.3 at 2B and -28.4 at 3B.

Also, he’s a guy that I pull up his player page and am astounded that he’s in his 10th season and is already 31.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Anon

Yeah, there’s a reason why to date he only he has 728 innings there, 110 of which came this year. He was roughly average there in 2018, maybe a bit below (-1 OAA in 159 innings) and then hilariously bad in 2019 (-3 OAA in 67 innings). Maybe he’ll get better? I mean, he has to, but maybe he’ll get better enough to not be an embarrassment there?

pleaseMember since 2024
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Not disagreeing with defensive ability here, but the ball that Enrique ‘flat-footed’ clearly hot the mound and changed course more than just a few feet by the time it got the EH, and after he made his first move to his left.

The mound was at fault on that play, not EH

Blue ShoesMember since 2019
3 years ago

The Brewers love to attempt the delayed steal of second with runners at the corners despite it literally never working. I don’t understand it.

g4Member since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Blue Shoes

I was at this game and can report that Brian Anderson flat goofed up. Contreras had actually decided to give him second base, but Anderson just stopped three-quarters of the way and stared in instead of coasting into second. After looking back the runner at third, Contreras is like, well all right then meat, you want it, you got it.

Anderson was far enough along that he could have walked into second uncontested had he just kept going in that direction. Somehow he got it in his head that he HAD to force a throw. Mental lapse.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago
Reply to  Blue Shoes

This may be one of those things that managers like to call from the dugout because it seems like it’d be clever, while it runs the risk of confusing the players on the field who have to carry it out. Like the fake wheel play.

Envy AngelMember since 2017
3 years ago

Remember how the Angels’ AA team recently lost a no-hitter 7-5? That’s the sort of training ground that results in the big-league team losing a game because of catcher’s interference calls.

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
3 years ago
Reply to  Envy Angel

It’s also the kind of training ground where the big-league team hands out 23BB + 3HBP in a 3-game series.

Last edited 3 years ago by Fun-Hating Dork
sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

Hey now, this training ground has produced a team that is only 3.5 games back from the division lead! Of course, most of that is due to Mike Trout and a bunch of guys who the Angels didn’t develop (Ohtani, Renfroe, O’Hoppe, Urshela). And also, they have a losing record. So maybe the training ground is a bit of a problem after all.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
3 years ago

Ben! In your comments on catcher’s interference you missed the catcher’s interference play of the ages. In Tuesday night’s game between the Red Sox and the Twins, with the Sox trailing 2-1, Hernandez led off the bottom of the 8th with a single, Casas fanned, then McGuire was sent up to PH. With a 2-2 count he swung and clearly hit Vasquez’s glove, The ball was a weak tap that was thrown to first but, inexplicably, Solano never came close to touching 1st. Hernandez, alertly, realized no one was covering 3rd and moved over. Meanwhile McGuire slowly ambled to 1st but got there. The Red Sox, obviously, took the result of the play and tied the game later. The fact that the Red Sox took the results absolved Vasquez from an error but it was as bizarre a catcher’s interference play as could be imagined. It is pretty clear that everybody on the field knew that interference had occurred and did not know that the play was still in action and failed to react properly. Absolutely unbelievable, but then Kapler gets pulls a TOOTBLAN for the ages to end yesterday’s game. To quote The Old Professor. “Can’t Anybody Here Play This Game”.

KvnMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Catcher’s interference is an oddly named rule because it’s much more like obstruction than interference. Other situations titled “interference” in baseball involving players (as opposed to fans, umpires, etc.) are committed by the offense and are automatic dead ball plays. Obstruction by contrast is committed by the defense and in many cases play will continue. Because of this I think many people (and apparently many players) don’t know that the offense can chose to take the result of a play when catcher’s interference occurred.

Milton Babip
3 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

I was listening to the Twins radio broadcast during that McGuire at-bat and they said something about McGuire having a tendency to “draw” catcher interference. Is this real and is it a known thing? Something about the path of his swing?

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  Milton Babip

In very rare cases there are some hitters who have a propensity to hit the catcher’s =mitt. One name stands out and that is Jacoby Ellsbury.

chris44
3 years ago

Interesting take on the Rangers offense. I think I would categorize their year so far as “mostly up,” I realize they have padded stats against the Royals lousy pitching but they also stacked up 17 runs in three games against the defending champs. Plus Nate Lowe hasen’t really gotten it going yet, that will play. I honestly expected us to be 5 back in the division at this point with that challenging opening schedule.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago

Very happy to see Travis Jankowski succeeding. Also very happy it’s not my team giving him playing time. He seems like a good guy and is more fun to watch than most players of his talent level, but if you’re starting him, you did something really wrong building your roster.

chris44
3 years ago

He is only starting becasue he is hitting suddenly! When you have a .870 ops you find paying time. The Rangers have other options.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago
Reply to  chris44

OK, I will amend that. If you’re starting him and have better options, then you have extremely wrong beliefs about “riding the hot hand.”

“Travis Jankowski has an .870 OPS… surely this will continue!” is a belief I am honestly surprised to find still present in a person entrusted with handing in a lineup card, anyplace in baseball. I thought they were requiring that basic level of numeracy everyplace by now.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
3 years ago

Speaking of interference, does anyone have a good look at the play from Bucs-Reds yesterday where Austin Hedges (catching) somehow drew a batter’s interference call on a strikeout-stolen base? Comments I’ve seen were like “Austin Hedges deserves an Oscar,” “Austin Hedges watches Italian soccer in the offseason,” iwasmurdered.gif, etc.

Carson Kahla
3 years ago

Since Seager went out the Rangers took 2 of 3 against the Astros and swept the Royals. Also their offense looked pretty good in the opening series against the Phillies

PascalMember since 2020
3 years ago

In one of last Tuesday’s Phillies/White Sox games, four consecutive Philadelphia relievers put up the exact same line: 1 IP, no hits, no walks, 2 Ks. Don’t see that in the box score very often.

rlyman22
3 years ago

On the bad read by Hernandez. It wasn’t a bad read at all. Look closer at the ball path. The ball hits off the mound and slightly changes direction.

chewbaccaMember since 2019
3 years ago

Would a double off of a bounce make it to sixth: https://www.mlb.com/video/jordan-montgomery-in-play-run-s-to-nick-ahmed

SenorGato
3 years ago

That’s all on Heaney if you want to assign blame, or all down to Peña’s observational skills if you’re into handing out credit.>>>>>

I am 21st century human! Blame! Blame! Blame!

Lanidrac
3 years ago

The Cardinals actually pulled off a variation of the throw-to-2nd-base-steal-home play this weekend. They just had to sacrifice two outs to do it, as the batter struck out, while the runner was thrown out trying to steal 2nd base. Yet, this still allowed the runner on 3rd base to score on the play.