Five Things I Liked (Or Didn’t Like) This Week, May 5

Randy Arozarena
Matt Marton-USA TODAY Sports

Happy Cinco de Mayo, and welcome to another edition of five things I liked or didn’t like in baseball this week. As I’ll surely note until the heat death of the universe, I got the idea for this column from Zach Lowe, who writes my favorite basketball column with the same conceit. This week’s edition has a little bit of everything.

1. Tampa Bay’s Perpetual Green Light

I’m going to show you the start of a play:

Now, here’s the deal: without the benefit of an error, the runner on third scored on this play. The runner on first advanced safely to second. How? The power of aggression and a heaping helping of Randy Arozarena realizing no one is covering second base, that’s how:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Poor Lucas Giolito saw it all, but like Cassandra, no one listened to him. The last-second point towards home plate is heartbreakingly pointless.

That might not look like a high-percentage play, but the Rays have been making this kind of aggression work all year. It helps to have a team full of fast and fast-twitch baserunners, and running in spots like that gives you the element of surprise, but you also risk some outs if you run so aggressively.

Only, the Rays don’t make outs on the basepaths. They’ve been caught stealing nine times, but they’ve only run into four other outs on the basepaths, which is shocking considering their aggression; they led baseball with 73 baserunning outs last year. But if you run this aggressively and don’t get caught, you’ll probably be the best baserunning team in baseball, and indeed they are: they’ve added 7.5 runs of value on the basepaths this year, three runs ahead of second place. Everyone’s getting in on the act: Arozarena might be the ringleader, but Yandy Díaz made an excellent secondary read to turn Arozarena’s cheeky advancement into a run.

Can they keep it up all year? I doubt it, because c’mon, did you see that play? There’s pushing the envelope, and then there’s tagging up on a popup that barely left the infield. But maybe I’m wrong, because they pulled off another daring heist Tuesday:

Boy, I hope I’m wrong. The Rays are a ton of fun, and their berserk baserunning is a big reason why. Brandon Lowe is enjoying it as much as I am:

2. Jorge Mateo’s Intuitive Brilliance

Close your eyes and visualize, and I’m sure you can come up with an idea of what good shortstop defense looks like. It’s range into the hole, a strong arm, and catlike agility to transition from one to the other. Jorge Mateo checks all the boxes, and he has a 2022 Fielding Bible award to prove it. But wait, there’s more:

You can add a talent for improvisation to that list of skills, clearly. Baseball isn’t always a fast sport, but fielding is all about split-second decisions. There’s no time to plan out your next move; a few tenths of a second is the difference between a fast runner and a plodding slugger, between an out and a hit. The fielders have an internal clock that lets them know when they can take an extra beat, but that’s a beat to gather yourself, not a beat to see the entire field from above and realize you can make an unfathomable play.

Most of the time, no one even gets to that ball. Mateo’s range is superlative, particularly on plays deep on the dirt or into the outfield. But even when he got to the ball, the obvious play was a throw to first base. This position hardly screams “sprint to third”:

When pundits talk about baseball IQ, they don’t usually mean plays quite this spectacular. They usually mean smart baserunning, or backing up an unintuitive position when the play develops weirdly. They don’t mean this play, because plays like this never happen. Mateo had about the blink of an eye to make up his mind when he saw Zach McKinstry take off for third. He was in the middle of loading up to throw to first when his peripheral vision picked up a baserunner, and he didn’t hesitate for an instant:

That’s bad luck for McKinstry, who saw Gunnar Henderson sprawled out on the ground and thought he had a free base. Against roughly 29 shortstops in baseball, he did. But Mateo is decisive, and blazing fast to boot. McKinstry isn’t slow, but you can count the number of major leaguers who can beat Mateo in a footrace on one hand. Henderson might be the presumptive shortstop of the future in Baltimore, but right now Mateo is hitting .321/.372/.595 and playing improvisational jazz defense. He’s a key driver behind Baltimore’s surprising start.

3. Michael A. Taylor, Making Plays

If you went back in time to March and told Twins fans that Byron Buxton wouldn’t have played a single game in center field this year by May, they’d be devastated. But Minnesota is in first place in a weak AL Central, and Buxton has been raking as a full-time DH to start the year. Using one of the best defensive outfielders of our generation there — voluntarily! — sounds bonkers, but after the Twins acquired Michael A. Taylor this offseason, they could replicate Buxton’s defensive value in center and give him a less taxing role to help keep his bat in the lineup.

This strategy wouldn’t work if Taylor didn’t produce offensively, but he’s done just that so far. He’s never going to be a dynamo at the plate — this is his 10th season in the majors, and he’s only posted a wRC+ above 100 once — but if he can stay in the neighborhood of average offensively, the Twins will happily save mileage on Buxton’s legs.

One way Taylor is contributing offensively: with a marvelous bunting game. He’s already dropped a walkoff bunt this year, which is hard to top. Last Friday, he pulled off what looked like a comparatively easy one, a safety squeeze that pulled Salvador Perez off of home plate and drove in Joey Gallo:

That’s exactly where they teach you to bunt it. Look at an overhead view of the situation as Perez retrieved the ball:

Magnificent. Even more fortuitously, no one was covering first, which means that Taylor both drove Gallo in and reached safely himself. Old school coaches frequently say that a squeeze bunt with less than two outs is the hardest play to defend, and that goes double when someone like Taylor is blazing towards first base. But he didn’t stop there:

What?!?! A double, too? That’s just icing on the cake, and if you do the math, you can see why it happened. Four infielders converged on home plate. One infielder tried and failed to cover first. That only leaves the shortstop, Bobby Witt Jr., who was covering third on the play. Why cover second with a runner on third and no one else? Because Taylor will take a free base if you’ll give it to him, that’s why. I especially loved Witt moonwalking backwards toward third just to be safe:

Taylor wasn’t satisfied with a ten-foot double, though; he stole third base later in the inning and scored a run. He might not have Buxton’s thunder, but when Taylor is playing like this, he’s a first-division center fielder. That’s exactly what the Twins had in mind when they traded for him this winter, and they’re hoping it will pay off with a fresh and healthy Buxton to prevent any September swoons this year.

4. Juan Soto, Patient as Always

Juan Soto is off to the most disappointing decent start to a season in recent memory. He’s hitting .227/.397/.427, good for a 130 wRC+, the second-best mark on the Padres. He’s also second on the team in WAR, trailing only Xander Bogaerts. That’s only a bad start by Soto’s elite standards, or as measured in batting average, I suppose. But even he would tell you that he’s been off. His swing looks unsettled; he’s been too early on a lot of pitches this year, resulting in more popups and wasted grounders than we’re used to from him.

Even when he’s scuffling, though, I love watching Soto work. His swing might be misfiring right now, but his sense of the strike zone is as strong as ever. On a 2-for-4 Monday night that featured a two-run double, I found myself transfixed by an eighth-inning walk. It started uncharacteristically, with a first-pitch swing. And a second-pitch swing. And a third-pitch swing:

Reiver Sanmartin was having a tough inning, but his first three pitches were perfectly located. He was dotting corners and making Soto look foolish. That last swing looks more like me playing intramural softball in college than one of the best hitters in baseball.

0–2 is a great spot for any pitcher to be in. Even though the outcome of the game wasn’t in doubt, striking Soto out would be a feather in his cap. But the job wasn’t done yet, and Soto is darn near impossible to fool. First, he got out of the way of a waste pitch:

A bounced changeup led to a muted shuffle and evened the count at 2-2:

Poor Sanmartin: he threw three great pitches and two bad ones, and now he was getting trapped in Soto’s web. This is still a pitcher’s count, but only nominally, and only against an average batter. It already felt like he would have to pull out something special to get a strikeout.

On his next pitch, he missed his target by a mile — and nearly dotted the inside corner:

That was an ugly swing, more a desperate attempt to defend a well-located pitch than an offensive effort. It worked, though, and Soto even found time to apologize to Curt Casali after catching him with the backswing.

My favorite part of all these clips is how much of a show it all is. He pounds himself in the hip after bad swings. He shuffles after good takes, or dances away after a pitcher buzzes him inside, smiling all the while. He’ll apologize to the catcher or chat up the umpire. All the while, he’s measuring the strike zone. And Sanmartin had gone from in control to barely hanging on:

More shuffling. More pounding. All of the sudden it was 3–2, and Sanmartin was surely despairing against this strike zone robot he was facing. Out of his last six pitches, three had been near-perfect, bisecting the edge of the zone. Soto fouled all three off and comfortably took the three that missed.

You probably know what’s coming next:

Pitchers can only throw strikes for so long. No one hits their target every time. Against Soto, that’s all he needs: leave the door open a crack, and he’ll walk through it to first base. He’ll put on a show while doing it, too.

Walks are mostly boring. They’re my least favorite part of three-true-outcome baseball; strikeouts are usually filled with delightful pitches and flailing swings, and home runs are a jolt of adrenaline, but walks are just men in pajamas standing around debating rules. Not when it’s Soto doing it, though. He’s a one-man show, with the pitcher providing the stage. I’m in favor of more walks in baseball — as long as Juan Soto is drawing them.

5. Stall Tactics

We’ve all seen it this year. The pitch clock is ticking down. The man on the mound hasn’t figured out what to throw, and he’s oblivious. There he is, staring down the catcher; doesn’t he know he has to go go go?? Three seconds, two seconds, one second — wait, timeout?

That’s Luke Maile circumventing the pitch clock there, but it happens quite a lot. The one that sticks in my head most so far is Alejandro Kirk, saving Chris Bassitt from further angst (and a walk) after he’d racked up an automatic ball before the game started:

The pitch clock has been a smashing success. Games are flying by, and they’re doing so with just as much action as before. That bonus tension when the clock gets low is the right mixture of low stakes but not no stakes; it matters, but it’s hardly going to flip the game on its head. It’s just a ball, or a strike depending on who’s being charged for it. They’re not out there awarding automatic home runs or anything; as far as I’m concerned, it’s a perfectly reasonable price to pay for streamlining the game.

These late timeouts circumvent the design of the rules, but it’s hard to blame the catchers for that. Canceling a ball is far more valuable than a mound visit; it would be a mistake not to call timeout in both of these situations. It even shows situational awareness, something I normally love in baseball.

My problem with it is that when a catcher calls for a mound visit, he actually has to go out and visit the mound. I’m not categorically anti-mound-visit; baseball is a mental sport, and a well-timed visit to let a pitcher cool down or refocus can steady the ship in trying times. But these visits aren’t about that. They’re about preventing an automatic ball, and then hey, I called a visit, might as well go out there. I understand why catchers are jogging out to the mound in these situations, but it’s merely ornamental, wasting time for the sake of wasting time.

Baseball without dead air is awesome. The league shouldn’t let this loophole stand. If a catcher wants to use one of their mound visits to prevent an automatic ball, let them. But don’t let them go out to the mound when they do; that’s not why they used it. Those meetings are basically useless; Maile and Kirk each spent less than ten seconds at the mound on their visits. When a catcher calls timeout with less than five seconds left on the pitch clock, the umpire should allow it, but keep the catcher behind home plate. MLB is doing a great job reining in dead time. They should stick with it and excise these vestigial mound visits.

Once again, thank you for indulging me as I walk through the plays that made me jump out of my seat or throw my hands in the air, for better or worse, this week. Until next time, enjoy baseball, and enjoy the tiny moments as much as the big ones.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

77 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
dukewinslowMember since 2020
3 years ago

Baseball is a lot more fun to me this year, and this column captures a lot of the stuff I don’t get to see. The Rays are just a fun team to watch, but that’s true of all the good teams this year, as those teams all seem to be really aggressive on the bases.

One thing I’m noticing- and I think it’s chickenshit but it’s allowed- is a lot of batter timeouts with two strikes. Makes sense? I would probably do it too. I’m curious if there’s more success for batters after a timeout.

raregokusMember since 2022
3 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

If you haven’t already used your timeout for that PA, why wouldn’t you use it with two strikes? A lot of players change their approaches at the plate in 2 strike counts, it makes sense to me to want to have a few extra seconds to think through scouting notes/choke up/whatever.

tdouglas
3 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Boy, as a Cardinals fan, this is the worst season of baseball I’ve experienced in my long, long life. I wish I could sit back and enjoy some of the changes; they are mostly good for baseball. I’m glad fanbases around the country, such as Pittsburgh and Baltimore, are getting to enjoy the game, though.

jlt421
3 years ago

I’ll never look at a walk the same way again!

drbn8rMember since 2016
3 years ago

These breakdowns are incredibly enjoyable. What a great idea.

As for #5 Small Tactics, do catcher visits to the mound count as one of the mound visits that each team is allotted per game? Or are those visits only when a coach visits the mound?

If catcher visits count as part of the allotment, managers can’t like them as it reduces the number of visits they or their pitching coach can make to the mound later in the game. To my way of thinking that’s a penalty that should limit catcher visits to a minimum and don’t add an excessive amount of time to any game.

Anon21Member since 2018
3 years ago
Reply to  drbn8r

Yes, they count as one of the limited mound visits but…has an MLB team ever used up all its mound visits? Not really a penalty.

Joe Joe
3 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

Yes, at least once. In a game I was at, the ump stopped the pitching coach at the baseline from going to the mound to see the pitcher as they were out of mound visits and no one was up in pen. The catcher was still allowed to talk with the pitcher (30 or so pitches for a 1-inning reliever with runners on in the 9th with a small lead that was bigger at the start of the inning) to give the pitcher a breather, and the team was basically granted an extra mound visit without having to pull the pitcher.

Last edited 3 years ago by Joe Joe
v2miccaMember since 2016
3 years ago

Kind of disagree with your last point. A catcher being forced to burn one of their mound visits to avoid a pitch clock violation is a sufficient penalty in my mind. Taking the actual mound visit from them in addition feels excessively punitive.

strycal
3 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

definitely agree. It would be like in the NFL when a coach or QB takes a timeout to avoid delay of game, and then the team doesn’t get to talk or huddle at all. Feels too strong of a penalty, when the burning of a timeout is already a big deal

68FCMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

I think the middle ground would be not requiring the catcher to go out to the mound. It still would count as a mound visit, but the catcher could decline to actually trot out there. I doubt anyone actually would because they wouldn’t want it to look like the pitcher made a mistake and there is some value of just quickly discussing the next pitch.

dodgerbleu
3 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

Agree with poster except I’d say I strongly disagree. They’re the teams timeout, and not at all solely to avoid the walk because there is value in addressing the underlying cause by trotting out there with a quick “Hey man, effin pitch clock but you’ve got to pick up the pace a little.. You got this, we good? Let’s go!”

Dingbat CharlieMember since 2018
3 years ago

I saw the Arozarena clip this week and wondered if it would make this column, and here it is!

MikeSMember since 2020
3 years ago

Taking advantage of bad White Sox fundamentals is a longstanding tradition.

Jon L.Member since 2016
3 years ago

On first watch of that Mateo play, I wasn’t sure how he had made the tag. Only after watching a couple more times did I understand that he tagged the runner at a full sprint and somehow also smoothly jumped over him!

Is it normal to be able to sprint with your knees bent low while reaching down and jumping over someone? Who else can do this?

EasyenoughMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  Jon L.

While keeping his eye on second base!

Mahoney
3 years ago
Reply to  Jon L.

Top-level athletes in any sport tend to have superhuman skills like that. And right now Jorge Mateo is one of the top-level athletes within that top level of baseball.

kevjag
3 years ago
Reply to  Jon L.

“Who else can do this?”

Chuck Norris perhaps? And maybe Mookie Betts because Mookie can do everything.

jrothMember since 2026
3 years ago

I would definitely wait a full season to see if the catcher stall happens enough to matter. I agree it’s mostly dead time, but at least sometimes the pitcher will have locked up for an actual reason that a brief visit can sort out. Just because the catcher isn’t going deep on mechanics or tactics doesn’t mean he’s not saying anything of value out there.

Tel
3 years ago
Reply to  jroth

Yeah I agree – Ben even starts out that section with “the man on the mound hasn’t figured out what to throw” So the catcher calls timeout and he goes out to the mound so they can talk about what to throw. Seems like the intended use of a mound visit to me.

whatmonsterMember since 2026
3 years ago

I saw you say the other day that these are the most time-consuming columns to write, and I will chime in with the other commenters that they are 100% worth it. There’s a lot of baseball played each week, and (like a lot of folks) I mostly watch my favorite team. I love reading this each Friday to catch up on fun baseball bits that I would otherwise miss.

Mahoney
3 years ago
Reply to  Ben Clemens

These are on par with Zach Lowe’s weekly NBA column. Only it’s baseball, which makes it a notch better by definition 🙂

EasyenoughMember since 2016
3 years ago

Love this series!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

That Arozarena play is going to go in the Javier Baez Museum of Awesomely Aggressive Baserunning.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

At this point Jorge Mateo is holding the spot for Jackson Holliday and not Gunnar Henderson. Mateo isn’t going to be able to keep this up but he can regress a long way and still be one of the top 12 shortstops in the league. Why would you want to change things up?

Mahoney
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Holliday is raking in the low minors, so his arrival may be some time in the next 12 months. Which is probably why he’s getting close to half his starts at second base, because Mateo isn’t getting moved any time soon.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

I don’t know, he seems to finally be needing to make adjustments in High A. Mateo’s under team control for 2 more years after this one, that seems to be about the right timeline for Holliday to take over shortstop full time.

HowBoutDemOsMember since 2019
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

There’s also Joey Ortiz to consider. Maybe they’ll trade him, or maybe they’ll trade one/both of Norby and Westburg while eyeing an infield of Henderson-Ortiz-Holiday. I dunno, lots of options.

Dmjn53
3 years ago
Reply to  HowBoutDemOs

Lots of great problems in Baltimore

Skoolboy Jim
3 years ago

Great to have a writer pointing out interesting situational hitting and base running: part of what makes baseball such a great game.

But I guess all you whippersnappers can’t get enough melodrama and histrionics when it comes to things like a Juan Soto ab. That kind of garbage has replaced what used to be a much bigger part of the game: toughness and unhinged desire to win. Now opposing players are making dinner plans on the bases between pitches.

ismailadiemeMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Skoolboy Jim

Good to see you on here Shawon Dunston!

Ukranian to Vietnamese to French is back
3 years ago
Reply to  Skoolboy Jim

I’m glad that the writer said grief, interesting situational beats and base running: some of what makes baseball such a great game.

But I don’t know, what do you advise, vippers, you can’t have rhinitis. Let’s go to the trash, what used to be a much bigger part of the game: hardness and non-pourgent desire to win. Now the opposing players are making plans for dinner on the bases between the fields.

Skoolboy Jim
3 years ago

Well, you dislike the comment but it wasn’t full of bad grammar, if that’s even the joke. You’re no Carson Cistulli…

AnonMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Skoolboy Jim

Whoosh. . . .missed it.

Jason BMember since 2017
3 years ago
Reply to  Skoolboy Jim

You must be new here! Welcome.

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
3 years ago
Reply to  Skoolboy Jim

If you are describing someone (or someone’s actions or desires) as “unhinged”, do you really expect it come off as positive?

idliaminMember since 2024
3 years ago
Reply to  Skoolboy Jim

Why are the oldheads who blather on about “toughness” (whatever that’s supposed to mean), rail against players having fun, opponents not actively hating each other, etc. mostly the same oldheads who whine that ballplayers “get paid millions to play a kid’s game”? Is it a kid’s game, or is it Serious Business™️? It can’t be both. 🤷🏽‍♂️

Spahn_and_Sain
3 years ago
Reply to  Skoolboy Jim

Counterpoint: Rube Waddell.

ajake57Member since 2019
3 years ago

My favorite part of the Mateo play is Gunnar Henderson realizing he isn’t going to beat Mateo back to 3rd base and slamming on the breaks like 20 feet away from where the play was made. He’s like, “oh shit!…. oh, shit”

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
3 years ago

Ben, Just as you said in your 4/17 chat, Randy Arozarena is just showing again that the talent evaluators missed pretty badly on him.

hopbittersMember since 2020
3 years ago

Mateo clip: 1 Friday productivity: 0

timMember since 2017
3 years ago

Hey Ben, Just a comment on the article series. As with most baseball fanatics the nuance of the game drives a great deal of our love for the game. It is why I am a loyal reader and member of FANGRAPHS. Your new weekly series really encapsulates this at the highest level. Each week of baseball delivers dozens of these nuances, some that we are able to see but many that we do not. Bringing us 5 more that we might of missed is sheer enjoyment.

Demiurge
3 years ago

For the life of me I’ll never understand how the double steal is successful as often as it is. Why aren’t catchers taught in little league to never throw down to 2nd base? Well, sure, if it’s a fellow catcher or other slowpoke runner at 3rd base then maybe, but even then you’re still risking home plate should the throw to 2nd be a little off or some other calamity occur to the 2nd basemen/shortstop.

What I would do every single time is fake a throw to 2nd then try to pick off the guy on 3rd.

dodgerbleu
3 years ago
Reply to  Demiurge

All through little league, high school and amateur independent ball I played competitively in until 2009, I was taught to uncork it to 2nd every time unless the runner on 3B was a game tying or game winning run. Go for the out, it’s more important than the run on 3B which had a good chance of coming across anyways. And don’t fake throw, could possibly slip out and create an error for nothing, could possibly hurt you arm.

The runner at 2B usually would stop to get in a rundown on purpose, to create time for the runner at 3B to score. So it was much like a bunt in that regard – they’re giving you a free out – take it. Calmly get the sure out between 1B and 2B.

Up until HS we also had the play where the SS would run in and intercept between the pitcher and the base, but that was really only effective at lower levels – Pony or 14u travel and below – where the SS was one of the handful of kids that was so much better than everyone else he could make it work. We did it some in HS, but mostly I’d throw it down.

The most effective technique I personally experienced was unintentional. I played in a Mexican League for a few years, about 80% of the guys on my team spoke English, I was one of two that didn’t speak Spanish, and we happened to be the two catchers haha. We had a full time reliever and another alternate that didn’t speak English, and the games were completely officiated in Spanish, and we all just kind of tried our best to make it work. But no one knew what to do, calling out “He’s running” or “Corre” or “Running” or “Corriendo”, sometimes we’d get both, sometimes we’d get neither. I’d have more than the occasional pitcher that wouldn’t know what was going on and would stick his glove up and end up with a happy birthday out at home. It really frustrated me at first, just kind of learned to accept it.

Any who, I’m not saying it’s right or wrong or better plays haven’t been determined, but I have hundreds and hundreds of games caught under my belt, and that’s at least what what I learned in regards to this situation.

AnonMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  dodgerbleu

The comment about the pitcher intercepting the throw reminded me of a Randy JOhnson moment. It wasn’t 1st and 3rd but just a runner on 1st. Johnson delivered the pitch (which missed for a ball), the runner took off for 2nd and Damian Miller came up firing. Unit was so pissed off about the pitch he just reached up and grabbed the throw down to 2nd. Didn’t even think about the runner and never flinched, just took a walk back to the rubber, got back up there and glared in for the sign. I will always remember the sight of MIller just standing there staring out at the mound a little bewildered.

DDMember since 2020
3 years ago

I disagree with your take on #5. First, if they are burning a mound visit when they call the timeout, they absolutely should have the opportunity to go to the mound for whatever they want to say to the pitcher. If you want to create a separate “pitcher reset” tally they are allowed to burn instead, then create it – don’t limit the value they have banked to use. Second, if the pitcher is struggling to select a pitch, day dreaming, or distracted, and the clock is running down, it is likely a good idea for the catcher to not just intervene, but also visit the mound to steady the pitcher, get on the same page with strategy, etc.

shadetreedog
3 years ago

I love these columns. Please keep ‘em coming!

benbenbenMember since 2023
3 years ago

In a similar vein of baserunning aggression, I loved watching Michael Harris take second on a casual ground ball through the infield. Can’t believe it worked!

https://www.mlb.com/video/michael-harris-ii-doubles-2-on-a-ground-ball-to-center-fielder-jazz-chish?partnerId=web_multimedia-search_video-share

Last edited 3 years ago by benbenben
chewbaccaMember since 2019
3 years ago

Love this stuff!! Way fun!!

dtpollittMember since 2016
3 years ago

THIS POST RULES WELL DONE

BaseballinDC1968Member since 2020
3 years ago

Great column. I’d love to show this to our high school team. Just a lot of situational awareness (and the lack thereof) as a big factor in games.

Bernie51fanMember since 2024
3 years ago

I enjoy this weekly feature. Seeing the Jorge Mateo clip made my week. But I don’t understand all the love for the pitch clock. It makes the game fast food instead of a three-course meal. It also gives more power to MLB’s umpires, who will, as they do with any power they’re given, abuse it with a combination of malfeasance, incompetence and arrogance. Because of the pitch clock, challenges have to be made within 15 seconds. This means challenges aren’t tried or are rushed. The rushed ones often fail and then teams are at the mercy of the umpires for the rest of the game. The point of using replay was to get things right. Now, MLB is about getting the game done. This is not a plus. “I don’t care if I never get back,” is now, “How quick can we get this over?”

Chip LockeMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  Bernie51fan

Jesus. They are 30 minutes shorter. That’s it. All this complaining acts like baseball games are the length of a basic cable sitcom show now. You still have a lot of time with the game. Just less dead air. I’m sorry that your team doesn’t get to watch a replay 5 times before asking the umps to watch it 10 times.

AnonMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Bernie51fan

Sorry, down vote. Even hardcore fans have been complaining for years about pitchers wandering around the mound and taking 30+ seconds to deliver a pitch. Yankees/Red Sox games in particular had become 4 hour minimum snooze fests. MLB did what it had to to stem the 40+ year slide in popularity among American sports fans. I’ve already talked to a lot of people who are casual fans who find it much more watchable. The cause for the increase in game time over the last few decades comes down to 2 things: A) time between pitches and B) a huge increase in foul balls (2017 was the 1st season ever with more foul balls than balls in play and has expanded since then). You can’t do anything about foul balls without fundamentally changing the game so they did the only thing they could by instituting a pitch clock.

Spahn_and_Sain
3 years ago
Reply to  Bernie51fan

In 1908, when ‘Take Me Out to the Ballgame’ was written (and for the following 25 years), the average baseball game lasted less than 2 hours.

slicedfriedgoldMember since 2019
3 years ago

This was a fantastic column. Great job, Ben!

Envy AngelMember since 2017
3 years ago

IIRC, Bassitt was having a lot of trouble with his pitch transmitter at the start of that game. I don’t think he was indecisive about which pitch to throw.

Last edited 3 years ago by Envy Angel
KobraCola
3 years ago

The pitch clock still sucks. Shaving 20 minutes off the end of the game isn’t worth removing all of the chess moves of a pitcher quick-pitching and then taking a long time for the next pitch. Or the batter stepping out of the box at the last possible moment to throw off a pitcher. These small moves are part of what used to make baseball great. Instead, those moves have been eliminated. Gen Z isn’t going to all of a sudden start watching the sport en masse because the games are 2 hours and 40 minutes instead of 3 hours. Baseball is supposed to be like fishing or reading a book or lazing on the beach on a sunny day. The point isn’t to get it over as quickly as possible. It’s to luxuriate in the moment, enjoy the journey and all of the small moments along the way.

PlatypiMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  KobraCola

When exactly are you referring to when you say “used to make baseball great”? Because games pre-1980s were even shorter than this.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/majors/misc.shtml

KobraCola
3 years ago
Reply to  Platypi

Before this season, obviously. That’s fine. I don’t have an issue with that. Was a pitch clock needed then? Nope. And it’s not needed now.

Willians Astu-stu-studilloMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  KobraCola

Sorry baseball is ruined for you now. Maybe try cricket? I hear they have some super long games.

KobraCola
3 years ago

I don’t need to try another sport. I’m allowed to criticize the MLB for a bad rule change without having to stop watching altogether. Are you one of those people who says someone has to leave the U.S. if they don’t like an aspect of the country?

kevjag
3 years ago
Reply to  KobraCola

Someone did a timing study of one of the most dramatic at-bats in the history of baseball, Kirk Gibson against Dennis Eckersley in the 1988 World Series. Guess what? That at-bat would have complied with the new pitch clock with no violations, with the exception of two extra throws over to first that would not have been allowed. In fact, most pitches in that at-bat would have been delivered with at least 6 or 7 seconds to spare on the clock.

So no, the new pitch clock not only doesn’t remove all of the “chess moves” that “made baseball great,” the actual data shows clearly that the clock has returned the game and its rhythms to when it actually was great.

Last edited 3 years ago by kevjag
KobraCola
3 years ago
Reply to  kevjag

Awesome! That’s one, small, anecdotal example. I thought we were on Fangraphs. Your response is one example? And those throws over to 1st base were important and should be allowed. It does remove those chess moves. Adding quotes doesn’t make that not true. Nope. It has ruined the sport. Get off Manfred’s jock and see the truth.

isntthisrichMember since 2018
3 years ago
Reply to  KobraCola

If you think it was the “chess moves” that made the game great, maybe you should stop watching baseball and start watching, you know, chess.

KobraCola
3 years ago
Reply to  isntthisrich

Are you aware of what a metaphor is? I don’t mean chess moves in the literal sense, obviously.

KobraCola
3 years ago
Reply to  KobraCola

Despite all of the petty downvotes with no explanation, I see nobody has denied that it doesn’t add viewership, which was supposedly the entire point of the move. It’s been a failure. MLB needs to admit failure and change it back.

Spahn_and_Sain
3 years ago
Reply to  KobraCola

If you’re going to spout off at someone in the thread for not having numbers to back up their posts, you should at least have the courtesy to back up your own claims.
A cursory look suggests both broadcast/streaming viewership and attendance are up. It would be silly to credit that all to rule changes, but even more silly to insist they’ve failed.

KobraCola
3 years ago
Reply to  Spahn_and_Sain

Yawn. A cursory google search will show you that viewership is down. I don’t need to google for you. They have failed. We have no proof that they have increased viewership. Anywhere viewership has increased, which it hasn’t, can be credited to being further away from the start of the pandemic (despite the fact that it’s not over).

KobraCola
3 years ago
Reply to  Spahn_and_Sain

Oh, and no one is “spouting off” anything. I’m allowed to comment my opinion here as much as you are. Don’t try to criticize my opinion by using biased ways of saying what it is.

Jason BMember since 2017
3 years ago
Reply to  KobraCola

MLB needs to admit failure and change it back.”

“I’ll take scorching hot takes with no basis in reality and have zero chance of coming to fruition for $800, Ken”

KobraCola
3 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

I’ll take terrible Jeopardy references that don’t add anything to the conversation for $0 cause they’re worthless, halfwit.

Root2
3 years ago

Best column in baseball journalism right now. Keep up the good work, Ben!

RammbergMember since 2019
3 years ago

Can anyone more tech-savvy than me let me know if there’s a way to pause these GIFs? I feel like I’m having a seizure as I scroll through this article.

Youppi!
3 years ago

The Taylor trade didn’t exactly fly under the radar but was sneaky smart. It’s nice to see Michael A having some success again in clearly defined, bottom of the order role.

4bagerrorMember since 2021
3 years ago

Can’t get enough Arozarena baserunning highlights? This one’s from 2017 with the Double-A Springfield Cardinals: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoXaziDcjPE