Foreshadowing the Padres Spending Spree

For the first time since perhaps lovable Tony Gwynn Sr. was swattin’ singles around the yard, the San Diego Padres have commanded the full attentions of the baseball world. The architect of these numerous wheelings and dealings, first-year General Manager A.J. Preller, would be hard for even dedicated fans to pick out of a crowd simply because he has been on the job for slightly over four months (and one of those months was the thrilling playoffs, when nobody was too concerned about the Padres).

Today, let’s get to know Preller a little bit via the stray scraps of video interviews that have been released since his hire. Personally, count me a fan of his simultaneously methodical and relaxed demeanor. More importantly, let’s comb through this unofficial archive in search for any clues that the Padres would dramatically reshape their team this offseason. Presented in chronological order:

August 6
Most Significant Clue:
“I think the timing of the hire actually lends itself to that, where you can kind of get into the offseason running.”

When Preller was hired in early August, I remember thinking that that had to be the absolute worst time of the whole 365 days of the year for a General Manager to be hired. The trade deadline has passed literally a week ago, and the draft wasn’t even two full months before that. Preller inherited a team that had been significantly shaped by his predecessors, Josh Byrnes, who conducted this year’s draft before being fired in late June, and interim GM Omar Minaya, who used his spare weeks in control to make some significant trades that shipped out Chris Denorfia, Chase Headley, and Huston Street. While Preller theoretically could have made some moves on the waiver wire, all he could do was basically sit on his hands and watch a team assembled by two guys who had been deemed unsatisfactory in their team-building abilities. What a bummer!

Credit Preller, then, for focusing on the positives in the timing of his hire. He was afforded a few months where he had no pressure to make any moves, and planned to use those months to get to know his organization from top to bottom. I wonder if this time to think and evaluate the whole system is what made Preller so eager to deal away prospects selected by his predecessors. It actually makes a lot of sense: Byrnes was unable to assemble a winning team at the major-league level, so why hitch your own future (i.e., Preller’s own future) to the eventual development of Byrnes-selected prospects? Byrnes presided over three drafts (2012-2014) and selected six first-rounders (including supplemental picks). Preller has traded away three of them this winter: Max Fried, Zach Eflin, Trea Turner.

September 29
Most Significant Clue:
“It’s always a situation, just, how you can improve, big-picture, in general. And I think, you know, when you’re finishing in third place, we’re going to look at every aspect.”

At the time, I’m sure a lot of what Preller said in this interview could be classified as empty sports-cliche-speak. Of course he says that the team is going to improve from finishing in third-place. Is there really any alternative for what a GM in that position is going to say? (“You know, the fans keep coming out even when we win 75 games, the bills get paid, I get paid, so it’s all fine by me.”) But, now, with the clarity of hindsight, one can definitely see that the gears were already turning in Preller’s head.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

A particularly nimble bit of linguistic gymnastics was when Preller noted that other teams “envy” the Padres’ double-headed catching platoon of Yasmani Grandal and Rene Rivera, which was by many measures the best pitch-framing duo of any team in the Majors. Since both Grandal and Rivera are now ex-Padres, it’s at the least very pro-active of Preller to get other teams to put a price on their catcher-envy. In this way, maybe Preller’s positivity about Alexi Amirista’s defense is also omen of a future transaction.

Preller’s comments about not being concerned about positional fits are also revealing now that he has a potentially overloaded outfield with Matt Kemp, Justin Upton, Wil Myers, Cameron Maybin, Seth Smith, and Will Venable. Given the pace of Preller’s moves, the odds of this sentence being not-obsolete as you, the reader, read it are frightfully small. Opening Day is still not visible on the horizon, so no need to be concerned about this logjam just yet.

December 8
Most Significant Clue:
“I think it’s a situation where, ownership has been in the loop so far throughout the whole process. They understand that, depending on what happens here in the next few weeks, it may take our budget to different levels, our payroll to different levels.”

December 8! What an eternity ago! At that distant point in the past, in a foreign era unrecognizable to this one, the most significant move the Padres had thus far made in the offseason was declining to tender a contract to Evereth Cabrera (December 1). Or perhaps the signing of Clint Barmes to a one-year deal (December 5) outweighed dropping Cabrera in terms of total fanfare.

But, even though Preller talks in detail about Turner’s future with the Padres, a future that would quickly become nonexistent, clues abound in this interview! Preller is so even-keel that his pronouncement of taking the Padres’ payroll “to different levels” almost slides by in the background of this interview, even though it is a big-ol’ blaring clue when typed out.

Other clues that are dripping with foreshadowing:

1. “I think there’s some pieces going forward that we feel are going to be a part of what we do here over the next few years, and now it’s a matter of adding to that core.” Preller’s sentence here is either spots-cliche-speak or a major piece of foreshadowing depending on ones interpretation of the words “some” and “core.” Judging by the ferocity of Preller’s moves in recent days, by “some pieces” he meant “not very many pieces.”

2. “I think the good thing is we already have a decent start with the pitching staff.” It’s worth noting that, although young pitchers with under a year of service time like Jesse Hahn, Burch Smith, and R.J. Alvarez have been dealt away from San Diego, their rotation including Andrew Cashner, Tyson Ross, Ian Kennedy, and Odrisamer Despaigne has remained intact. Last year’s Padres also had a truly elite bullpen, and its core, including Joaquin Benoit, Kevin Quackenbush, and Nick Vincent has also been essentially untouched. For all of the Padres’ moves, they really just involve the offensive half of their team. Which was, you know, really bad last year.

3. “At the end of the day, we’re just looking to make good decisions and good deals. If that ends up being a deal with the team in the National League West, so be it.” With hindsight, this is basically a siren that the Kemp trade is about to go down.

Whatever other moves the Padres have made between the time I’ve typed these words, and the time these words come across your eyes, one new fact is for sure: we’re no longer surprised that Preller will surprise us.





Miles Wray contributes sports commentary to McSweeney's Internet Tendency, Ploughshares, The Classical and Hardwood Paroxysm. Follow him on Twitter @mileswray or email him here.

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Big JgkeMember since 2020
11 years ago

Dude has 80 grade eyebrows.

Eric
11 years ago
Reply to  Big Jgke

And 80/80+ eyes.

Carson Cyst-Stooly
11 years ago
Reply to  Eric

40 grade roster construction skills so far but 80 on releasing medical information illegally.

Randy Jones
11 years ago

Assume much?

Yelp
11 years ago
Reply to  Big Jgke

Preller’s eyebrows are nothing compared to Josh Satin of the Mets.

In this clip below, Keith Hernandez talked about Josh Satin “opening up some eyebrows” on a telecast. This provided proof of Satin’s eyebrows standing out…and was pretty hilarious.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xavP7LAGHk

Listen close and you can hear the announcers muffled laughter.

Jensan
11 years ago

Seth Smith, or Carlos Quentin are considered reasonable trade bait, another SP pitcher and I believe a catcher are required, do the Mets and Padres have a possible trade partnership in the future. A Jon Neise/ Dillon Gee for Maybin and Carlos Quentin , two of these four could be the making of a deal.

The most interesting aspect , I believe the Padres payroll will be around 90 million dollars , slightly less than last year, with an upgrade in talent – middlebrook, Norris, Kemp, Upton and Myers- with Morrow and Josh Johnson as 6 th and 7th SP.

Add another catcher in a trade , I believe would be beneficial, as Norris can split his time at 1st as well.

Mike
11 years ago
Reply to  Jensan

Carlos Quentin will probably bring back little to nothing. I wouldn’t be surprised if they kept Quentin as a bench bat and maybe even got him some innings at first to see if he can play there and boost his value for a trade deadline deal to an AL team that needs RH power. One of Venable and Maybin will probably get traded with the other serving as a 4th OF, both have major flaws in their games but both also have some pretty good upside. Maybin is a very good CF defender who just needs to get on base a little more and be healthy to let his speed play up. Venable is just a year removed from a 20/20 season and is good enough in the field to play all 3 OF spots, he just cannot hit lefties or make enough contact to remain an every day guy in the Bigs. In my opinion cincinnati, toronto, baltimore, texas, san francisco look like spots that could match up. My guess is that Seth Smith is as good as gone. He is a valuable piece that was the best offensive player for SD last season and could net a good return from a depth SP to a couple of good but not great prospects, depending on if Preller wants to shift his position a little bit.

Randy Jones
11 years ago
Reply to  Mike

Rumor is Giants have some interest in Venable, though at this point the Padres probably need his left handed bat just for some balance on the team. Pads will not play Quentin at first – they say manning first can be harder on the legs than even playing outfield with all the quick starts and stops. If he’s healthy in ST and looks halfway decent at the plate, some AL team will take a chance on him…with the Pads picking up much of the tab

brendan
11 years ago
Reply to  Randy Jones

I would _love_ to have venable to play LF. Would be nice to have a RH bat to platoon w/ blanco, but at this point, give us some serviceable depth, please.

Randy Jones
11 years ago

There have been two men in history who have made wine out of water.

One is AJ Preller.

I’m sure even he knows this roster still needs a lot of work. Expect more (major) moves.

cubfanjack
11 years ago

I find Jensan’s comment remarkable int at he states the Padre payroll at this point is actually lower than last season? Wow! What is anyone’s opinion on how badly the Padre farm system was depleted? Not too badly? Well worth the subtractions for what was received in return?

2017
11 years ago

It’s going to be amusing to watch people 7 months from now, the ones in love with the Padres moves, start realizing that they lost, Fried and 2 other nice prospects for an exciting offseason, 85 wins and no playoffs.

That they traded two nice arms for a First baseman who doesn’t hit much.

That they will still owe 75 million to Kemp for 2017, 2018 and 2019. That will be right around the time the Padres desperately try to move Kemp to an AL team that wants him as a DH.

Preller is the Worst GM in baseball, it will become clear during the season when you see what an OF of Kemp, Myers and Upton gets you in the NL West.

The Padres will lead baseball in striking out, warning track outs and opponents batted balls that reach the wall.

Dan GreerMember since 2018
11 years ago
Reply to  2017

You don’t have to love his moves, but you honestly think Preller is worse than Amaro?

cubfanjack
11 years ago
Reply to  Dan Greer

Didn’t i see somewhere that SD is moving it’s fences in a tad more? Left center i believe..i believe it was Petco and not Citi Field.

That may de-fang the warning track outs thing..but i will watch with amusement to see if chemistry can be generated between Kemp and Upton…they have both been know for personality conflicts and temper tantrums. Friedmans recently said that the Dodgers now have a functional roster as opposed to dys…i see that as a thinly veiled jab at Hanley and Kemp. I also forsee a subpar defense. But I applaud Preller’s stones. Have any of us ever witnessed an off season like this with tons of moves made on many teams?

circlechange11
11 years ago
Reply to  2017

Here’s my take …

1. We complain when lesser teams dont try hard to get better.

2. When they do try hard, we complain that they still aren’t great.

The season hasn’t even been played yet. The dodgers and giants have lost key pieces. Padres have gotten better. Luck, randomness, injuries can have a 10 game or so swing in the standings. Padres have given themselves a chance.

Not everybody can build through the draft because theres just not that many major leaguers there. Some teams, like my favorite, hit the jackpot with a hall of fame in the 14th round that escalates the whole franchise.

The cubs at getting praise for being a .500 team. We should acknowledge that sd has done the same thing.

1. When your opponents are taking a step back, that’s the time to take a step forward.

2. There’s rarely, if ever, a time when all the pieces you need are available at the time and price you need them.

I credit sd for trying.

David
11 years ago
Reply to  circlechange11

“When they do try hard, we complain that they still aren’t great”

Opinions have been changing on teams making an effort to improve even if they don’t look like a wild card team. The Padres and perhaps the Marlins however are trading significantly from future value for short-term present value, which is why they’re being cirticized. The Cubs, White Sox, and Twins are examples of bad teams making efforts to improve without losing as many young, cheap assets that should be able to contribute when the team is actually good. So no, the Padres have not been doing the same thing as the Cubs.

“When your opponents are taking a step back that’s the time to take a step forward”

Except the Padres were several steps behind their opponents and still aren’t close, as indicated by how poorly they compare to the Dodgers and Giants.

“There’s rarely, if ever, a time when all the pieces you need are available at the time and price you need them”

Why do the Padres need short-term pieces now? Does overpaying for several pieces yet still needing more to be a decent team justify things?

circlechange11
11 years ago
Reply to  David

I understand what you are saying.

I guess I would ask “what future are the Padres mortgaging?”

The Royals had the best minor league group in history after X years of being horrible, and quite a few of those prospects didn’t materialize. Same thing could happen with the Cubs.

I guess the point in making is if you can get a “.500 team on paper” and have a couple things go right, you can make the playoffs.

GM’s also dont have 3 years worth of losing, 3 years of developing draft picks, and then be able to acquire free agents to put together a 2-3 year run. I suppose some GM’s do, but probably not the norm.

I guess I’m more willing to just see how it all plays out.

eliasll
11 years ago
Reply to  2017

The padres are a better team in paper than the WS Champs, who is the last really good prospect from that farm system? latos? before him Peavy? Their farm is always well ranked and have not produced stars for some time now. They still have 3 of their 4 top prospects and i think they will compete in that division and bring excitement back to San Diego

Jensan
11 years ago

Hey Doc,
My belief is that an 85-90 million 2015 salary. Seth Smith for Jon Neise . Also believe Navarro for a RP or Venable.
Fills two holes on the Friars. More importantly, this team which drew 2.15 million in attendance may push 2.75 million in 2015.

More importantly, San Diego payroll is paid including manager, coaches, GM and the 24 scouts and office staff of 25 as well as the minor league players excluding present year draft choices totaling an extra 20 million annually totaling $112 million.

Those receipts from major league baseball Tv, MLB Advanced Media, Licensing , BELP and the 34% Share of Regional TV and the remaining amount of the regional Tv plus any incremental share of growth from 2014 to 2015 of that 34% share of the RSN, ( this year approx. 450,000).. The MLB contribution for 2015 will be approx. 118 million dollars.

That attendance excluding corporate boxes for 2015 could be worth $80 million in ticket sales. This team has other revenue streams and stadium costs and interest costs for purchase of the business. Padres could earn EBITDA between 80-100 million annually does the ownership own part of the Sports Network , which is sheltered from RSN sharing , and that income is severed from the baseball team.

cubfanjack
11 years ago
Reply to  Jensan

Brother–i don’t know how and where you gather your info–but nicely done.