Freddie Might Become a Free Man

In one of the oddest twists of the season, the Atlanta Braves have seen their playoff odds skyrocket after losing one of the league’s best players, Ronald Acuña Jr., to a torn ACL that prematurely ended his 2021 season. Now up to 81.9% odds of making the postseason from a low of a 7% chance — the 2019 Nationals never dipped under 22% in our projections — the Braves seem much more likely to be successful than not. And regardless of whether the season ends on a positive note, all of Atlanta’s key contributors are under team control in 2022 with one exception. But that exception is quite notable: 2020 National League MVP Freddie Freeman.

The general assumption around baseball — one that I also hold — has been that Freeman will of course be back with the Braves in 2022. After 12 seasons in Atlanta, during which Freeman was quite purposefully kept as the face of the team even while the Braves were aggressively rebuilding several years ago, seeing him in another uniform would just seem odd, almost on par with seeing Derek Jeter in Dodger Blue or Cal Ripken Jr. in green and gold. But the fates don’t care about looking bizarre, and the fact remains is that we’re entering mid-September, and player and team have yet come to an agreement on a contract extension. Jon Heyman reported on Thursday that there was still a gap between Freeman and the Braves:

Even if you think that Freeman will still eventually sign, him hitting free agency doesn’t seem quite as far-fetched as it did a year ago, and once a player begins talking with other teams, all bets are off. An elite first baseman becoming available to the highest bidder has actually become relatively rare, and if the CBA negotiations don’t drag down the winter activity — they very well might — teams with cash and the opportunity to sign a top player at the cold corner could result in Freeman leaving Atlanta. By the ZiPS projections, as measured in the first year of the new deals, no top five first baseman has been a free agent in nearly a decade:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
ZiPS Positional Rank for Prominent Free Agent First Basemen
Player First Year of New Contract ZiPS Positional Rank
Freddie Freeman 2022 2
Carlos Santana 2021 14
José Abreu 2020 17
Carlos Santana 2018 7
Eric Hosmer 2018 13
Logan Morrison 2018 17
Yonder Alonso 2018 21
Lucas Duda 2018 24
Steve Pearce 2017 17
Chris Davis 2016 6
Daniel Murphy 2016 16
Adam LaRoche 2015 21
Mike Napoli 2014 16
Mike Napoli 2013 8
Adam LaRoche 2013 25
Albert Pujols 2012 1
Prince Fielder 2012 5
Carlos Pena 2012 12
Paul Konerko 2011 11
Carlos Pena 2011 13
Derrek Lee 2011 15
Aubrey Huff 2011 17
Adam LaRoche 2010 7
Carlos Delgado 2010 10
Nick Johnson 2010 14
Mark Teixeira 2009 5

The last first baseman to hit free agency with a better projection than Freeman was Albert Pujols in 2012, back when we were all sweet summer children when estimating how his 30s would go. Since the Chris Davis signing — another one that didn’t go that well for the team — only Carlos Santana entering 2018 even projected in the top 10 at the position. Sorry, Eric Hosmer fans!

Now, none of this means that Freeman will enter the season with a contract north of $200 million, even if the labor environment turns out to be shockingly tranquil. Sabermetrics was, of course, a thing in 2012, but you still had fading remnants of a past when slugging first basemen were generally overvalued, and there were more people still hanging onto the curious belief that players in their early 30s were still in their likely primes. A lot has changed. Can you imagine the AL and NL home run leaders attracting next to no interest in free agency in 1996, as was the case with Mark Trumbo and Chris Carter after the 2016 season? Hosmer’s eight-year, $144 million deal is one of the very few lucrative ones a first baseman has gained in free agency since the Davis deal, and the results for San Diego aren’t exactly likely to encourage general managers and team presidents to empty their teams’ wallets.

But even if he doesn’t break $200 million, Freeman will be highly sought-after by a lot of teams. He’s a terrific player right now, and signing him to your team can add up to four or five wins, which is very hard to do at the position. Unless he went 0-for-the-rest-of-the-season or something, he’d still rank as the top first baseman in ZiPS going into 2022 if not for Vladimir Guerrero Jr.’s explosion this year. ZiPS sees a few more All-Star seasons for Freeman and a good half-decade or so of remaining a key contributor.

ZiPS Projection – Freddie Freeman
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SB OPS+ DR WAR
2022 .289 .391 .520 546 98 158 35 2 29 107 86 7 137 2 4.5
2023 .287 .388 .521 526 93 151 35 2 28 103 82 5 136 2 4.2
2024 .280 .378 .492 504 84 141 31 2 24 92 75 5 126 2 3.3
2025 .277 .370 .477 480 76 133 29 2 21 83 67 4 121 1 2.7
2026 .272 .360 .455 453 68 123 25 2 18 73 59 4 112 1 2.0
2027 .266 .349 .428 425 60 113 22 1 15 64 50 3 103 0 1.2

With dollars-per-win stagnant in the $7-$8 million range and likely growing slower than a decade ago, ZiPS suggests an offer of six years, $138 million as a win-win for Freeman and Atlanta. The rest-of-career projections put Freeman at 425 home runs and just under 2,700 hits, giving him an interesting Cooperstown case. ZiPS sees a final JAWS number of 51.3, nestling him just below Mark McGwire and Eddie Murray and just above Hank Greenberg and George Sisler. The system sees Freeman as having a tough hill to climb for 500 homers, at 6%, mostly due to running out of calendar, but a nearly one-in-three chance at 3,000 hits.

In the end, I expect Freddie Freeman to end up back in Atlanta and retire a Braves legend. If he makes it to the Hall of Fame, there won’t be any controversy about which cap he has on his plaque. But things might not actually work out that way, and if I were a fan of the Braves, I’d be feeling quite a bit of unease until a deal is actually signed.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

45 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
JohnThackerMember since 2020
4 years ago

Would Paul Goldschmidt be a close comp, although he didn’t hit free agency because he was traded in the last year of his contract, then the Cardinals extended him? I believe that Freddie is almost exactly two years younger than Goldschmidt.

amartin
4 years ago
Reply to  JohnThacker

I think it’s a good comparable, Freeman has played a couple more years the Goldy had so he has more overall WAR, but Goldschmidt averaged more WAR per season. I was comparing the two yesterday, and it’s crazy how similar their batting profile is (Goldschmidt is a better baserunner and defender though, which is what changes the difference in WAR per year)

kylerkelton
4 years ago

What’s interesting is that it wasn’t until last year that he started to *feel* like a Hall of Famer to me, for whatever that’s worth. He’s really putting together a nice case. Obviously he’ll have to stay strong through his 30s, but 3000 hits doesn’t sound far-fetched. It’ll be tough but you don’t have to squint hard to see it.

vslykeMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  kylerkelton

Having a MVP award and a deep playoff run on his resume really helps.

JamesD84
4 years ago

I was a little surprised that ZiPS projects Freeman with more RBI than R every year starting in 2022, considering that he has scored 105 and driven in 74 this year and is almost even for the rest of his career. (Maybe batting 2nd or 3rd behind Acuna & Albies has given him fewer RBI opportunities than most top-of-the-order batters get because of their home runs?) Does ZiPS just project PA, BB, singles, doubles, etc., and then say that those totals should result in X number of runs and Y number of RBI, or does it consider a player’s previous R and RBI totals?

dodgerbleu
4 years ago
Reply to  JamesD84

Don’t know how any of it works, but Albies is bad at getting on base and should never be near the top of a lineup vs RHP with a .312 career OBP. And good pop as you say with a .191 ISO. Hell, even against LHP he’s a slugger with less than a 5% walk rate. I doubt the lack of RBI’s is on Freddy..

Lanidrac
4 years ago
Reply to  JamesD84

Well, when you’re batting 2nd in the order, you tend to score more runs than you drive in (while 3rd can go either way, and 4th on down usually gives the advantage to RBIs). Perhaps ZiPS projects Freeman to hit 2nd most often going forward?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

We had a pretty long conversation about this a few days ago but I am very skeptical of big contracts for first basemen in their 30s, no matter how good they are. A huge number of “worst contracts” in MLB fit this description. Pujols. Howard. Chris Davis. Miguel Cabrera. To a lesser extent, Matt Carpenter and Adrian Gonzalez. This is even before we get to Prince Fielder (who probably should be in this category but he got hurt so we’ll never really know) or Eric Hosmer (who was younger and everyone thought it was a bad idea anyway). Until he totally reinvented himself this year, Votto was in this category too. Goldschmidt looks good again but not really a big star anymore; he’s what counts as a success story but he’s not living up to the contract either. Rizzo would be in this category if his contract hadn’t been criminally low; he’s 31 and just about done.

I agree that the most likely outcome is that someone is going to give him a lot of money but if the Braves are in the mood to give out $150-200M they should just go all out and sign Correa instead (that will be more than $200M but it’ll probably be a better use of the money). To use language recently used for Carlos Santana, first basemen become pumpkins somewhere between 31 and 34, and it doesn’t seem to matter how awesome you were before that.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Why does position matter more than health and batting projection? It seems like 1B and LF and DH should age about the same as “bat first” positions. JD Martinez and Nelson Cruz are doing just fine.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

That’s a very good question! I don’t know. To some extent, the problem is that you shouldn’t be giving out free agent contracts that are that big, period. But you are right that it seems like corner outfield mashers seem to get demoted to DH and are fine. Although Martinez’s best years were when he was playing the outfield regularly (and, also, he’s way younger than Cruz).

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

[deleted]

Seamaholic
4 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

It’s more about body shape and athleticism than anything else. Nelson Cruz is just a freak of nature, don’t know what to say about that. But guys who are huge and limited athletically to 1B generally decline very quickly. Freeman doesn’t have that … umm … chunky body type though, so maybe he’ll be another exception.

SenorGato
4 years ago
Reply to  Seamaholic

He’s huge, makes a ton of contact, takes walk, hits for power, and plays good defense…Obviously entering his 30s there’s more risk and the cap space plus raw inefficiency will rub many the wrong way but I don’t know what’s so scary about Freeman

SenorGato
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I still have the same issues as when this was mentioned. Generalities are fun and easy and for the fans to help their owners, but what about Freeman himself worries you so much? Where/When does the individual become an individual? How bad were those contracts really, etc etc

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  SenorGato

The first problem is that we don’t actually know Freeman’s individual trajectory yet so we have to look at what other players look like. And we don’t know exactly why all those guys flopped at the same time. So it’s hard to say how concerned we should be about Freeman doing the same. Although I am pretty sure that by any standard those contracts were bad (for the team, not for the player obviously).

As far as the projection goes: His projection clocks in at roughly about half a win higher than I would have expected over time. ZiPs clearly really believes in his 2021, but otherwise Freeman has been exceptionally consistent in terms of offensive performance–about 30%-40% higher than league average. His defense has fallen off, and that’s unlikely to return. He’s roughly a 4-win player over 600 PAs next year, just like he has been this year. If he’s at 4.5, well, maybe then that there is some optimism for a big contract. I’m just not.

fjtorres
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Freeman has been very consistent, home and away, year after year.
And 2021 is actually representative of his career average despite his low BA pre-sticky stuff ban. 2019 was the outlier, powerwise, but his strikeout rate has been improving.
He might yet implode in a year or two but there are no immediate red flags.
It would be interesting to see what the gap is about: is Atlanta lowballing him? Is he asking for a longer contract than reasonable?
Or is it just CBA uncertainty?

It’s worth watching to see what kind of market he finds but I can’t quite see him signing early.

Seamaholic
4 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Atlanta’s owned by a major corporation and has no doubt a fairly strict budget. If you start entering into the high twenties or even $30m AAV range, that means you’re giving up a lot of opportunity to add short term guys like they’ve been doing for years now. You can get value in different ways if you have that much money to play with because you let him go.

SenorGato
4 years ago
Reply to  Seamaholic

OTOH “short term guys” is new code for “worse and/but cheap,” not to mention the opportunities to add those high value low dollar signings is “alot” in the sense that there are tons of cheap players in today’s meta

The Duke
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Goldschmidt has been somewhat impacted by park factors. Plus he had a bad half year after signing the extension in 2018 – likely nerves.

He’s been fine overall. He hasn’t provided any excess value but he’s doing exactly what was expected.

Zips projected his extension years at 3.8, 3.0, 2.4, 1.7, .9

He has delivered 2.0(*2.6)= 5.2, 4.7 so far. His 2019 was 2.6 whereas you might have expected around 5.

Over the three years he’s been about spot on but with with a weird distribution.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

That’s what was expected?! That’s awfully disappointing. At least he’s still an above average regular, but yikes.

carterMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Coming in around 5 war is below what was expected?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  carter

If you’re getting paid $25M a year, yes, I would say so.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I clearly misread that. Coming in around 5 WAR is what was expected. But he hasn’t done that.

Lanidrac
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

But he has outperformed ZiPS for both 2020 and 2021 to make up for his relatively disappointing 2019.

TKDCMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That’s a lot of hand waving and nothing to see here about both Votto’s success and his contract, both of which have been very positive.

Lanidrac
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

To be fair, it’s the big-bodied guys who mostly tend to age badly, while Pujols developed a chronic ankle injury that sapped his ability to run and hold up his body properly at the plate.

shampain
4 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

It was plantar fascitis — bottom of the foot — not ankle. And he had it for years before he left StL, but it got so bad that it required surgery. So he was hobbled before that and never really recovered after it.

Lanidrac
4 years ago
Reply to  shampain

OK, yes, his foot, but it only significantly hindered him after he reached his 30’s, hence his quick decline.

artiefufkinMember since 2020
4 years ago

He’s totally going to sign with the Angels.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  artiefufkin

It would be very much like the Angels to drop an enormous amount of money on one of the few positions they’ve figured out (thanks to Jared Walsh).

fjtorres
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Exactly.
My own expectation is they’ll go for Verlander. He has the name and he can’t ask for a long deal at his age. They like names.

catmanwayne
4 years ago

It’ll be weird if Freddie’s not wearing a Braves jersey.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  catmanwayne

Braves fans (like me) have a somewhat unhealthy liking for the man, Chipper was that friend from high school who you stopped hanging out with once you got married. Freddie is the solid friend from college rock band church with a truck.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  catmanwayne

It’s weird for me that Trea Turner is not a NAT. You get over it, but it does take time!

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
4 years ago

Ozzie Albies sacrificed $100M so Freddie could get paid.

Not really of course, but seriously, use that surplus to keep Freddie. The NL eventually gets the DH and you can save his body.

Groundout
4 years ago

Is it fair to use Springer as a comp for contract purposes?

Springer and Freddie are basically exactly the same age and pretty steady 140 wRC+ hitters, with Freeman averaging slightly higher numbers. Springer’s got a little bit more of an injury history, but being a CF helps a lot for aging and present value purposes.

Because Springer got $150 for his 31-36 seasons, it’s really hard to see Freeman getting $150 for his 32-36 seasons. At the same time, it seems like he should at least match Goldy’s $130.

So I’d guess Freeman’s market is about 5/135, but I’d say it turns out closer to 7/165 to ensure he’s a Brave For Life. Anyhow, it seems like there isn’t that wide of a range for where this ends up.

fjtorres
4 years ago
Reply to  Groundout

That might be the gap.
If so: vesting options.

Mike NMN
4 years ago

The connection to Hosmer is a stretch because Hosmer’s mediocrity was well known at the time of his deal. Freeman is a better player. But it’s true he could get punished because of Hosmer.

Johnnie TMember since 2024
4 years ago

As marvelous as Freeman is and despite the justified affection Braves fans feel for him, the kind of contract that he will likely receive will almost certainly not be that good for the team. How many contracts given to players his age (and 1B at that) have turned out well? At best, the signing team will get a few years of good but probably declining production that can help them win in their window of contention and then be stuck with an albatross contract. As Padre and Angel fans can attest, the back halves of those contracts are excruciating… teams paying $28m a year to get production from a 1b that can easily be obtained by some cheap 1b on the free agent wire, or from your good-hitting 3b who had knee surgery and can’t handle 3b defensively anymore…

That is the best case. Unless you can sign him to a shorter term deal.

bluerum29
4 years ago

He will stay a Brave. Has to. He is the face of the franchise. Without him, not the same team. He is the heir apparent to Chipper Jones.

Seamaholic
4 years ago

Freeman’s value isn’t that much more than CJ Cron’s this year (and Cron is actually a bit younger). The Rockies picked Cron up for nothing last off-season. That’s the problem with being a first baseman. There’s lots of them around who can hit.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  Seamaholic

CJ Cron was one of the best deals the Rockies have signed in recent memory. He has been very solid and they got him for a song.

bluerum29
4 years ago
Reply to  Seamaholic

Freemans value is much more than just numbers on a page for that team.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  bluerum29

I dunno why this would be downvoted because it’s true. Just from a marketing perspective he’s worth more to the Braves than another player with that production. Liberty should just make an equity offer like you do with any other executive hire.

SenorGato
4 years ago
Reply to  bluerum29

Fool, no hu-mon is above their data. What do you think this is?