Giancarlo Stanton Has Struggled with the Fastball
Giancarlo Stanton still looks like Giancarlo Stanton. He’s a gigantic human being who possesses a fierce swing that inflicts damage upon baseballs when his bat makes contact. The problem in the early part of this season is that his huge swing is making slightly less contact than it did a year ago when he was the National League MVP.
Stanton has swung at 116 pitches this year and has whiffed 48 times, per Baseball Savant. Based on his fantastic 2017 season, we would expect to see about 34 whiffs. While a difference of 14 whiffs over 250 pitches doesn’t seem like a lot, it’s the difference between normal, awesome Stanton and this abnormal version of Stanton that has struck out in 40% of his plate appearances.
To better understand just what’s going on with Stanton, let’s try to take the early-season numbers we have and separate normal Stanton from abnormal Stanton. To start, here is a table showing some statistics from his career, from last season, and from this season to spot the problems.
| Metric | Career | 2017 | 2018 | Normal/Abnormal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BB% | 11.8% | 12.3% | 10.5% | Normal |
| K% | 27.8% | 23.6% | 40.4% | Abnormal (Bad!) |
| ISO | .286 | .350 | .275 | Normal |
| BABIP | .317 | .288 | .360 | Abnormal (Good!) |
The increase in strikeouts is as large and noticeable as Stanton is. His walk numbers seem fine. His BABIP is much higher than his career levels and much, much higher than last season’s. The ISO is also strong. When Stanton makes contact, he is doing just as much damage as he normally would — if not slightly more. The table below shows Stanton’s xwOBA and wOBA on contact from 2017 and this season.
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | Normal/Abnormal |
|---|---|---|---|
| xwOBA | .491 | .622 | Abnormal (Good!) |
| wOBA | .512 | .556 | Normal |
This indicates again that, when he makes contact, Stanton has actually been hitting the ball with more authority than he did last season. Going off just results, Stanton’s production on contact resembles the very best version of himself. The problem is, he’s been making contact at a rate much worse than his established levels. If the unprecedented success on contact regresses but the whiffs remains, there could be trouble.
Let’s take a look at Stanton’s plate-discipline numbers to see what might be gleaned from Stanton’s batting eye.
| Metric | Career | 2017 | 2018 | Normal/Abnormal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| O-Swing% | 31.1% | 27.4% | 32.4% | Normal |
| Z-Swing% | 65.2% | 65.8% | 66.7% | Normal |
| Swing% | 44.7% | 42.9% | 46.4% | Normal |
| O-Contact% | 50.0% | 52.5% | 45.8% | Normal |
| Z-Contact% | 81.4% | 81.5% | 69.1% | Abnormal (Bad!) |
| Contact% | 68.2% | 70.4% | 59.5% | Abnormal (Bad!) |
| Zone% | 39.8% | 40.5% | 40.8% | Normal |
| SwStrk% | 14.0% | 12.5% | 18.8% | Abnormal (Bad!) |
Stanton appears to be choosing to swing in the appropriate situations — or, at least, at rates commensurate both with last season and his career. He’s missing on a few more swings outside of the zone, but the biggest change has come on pitches inside the strike zone. He’s just whiffing a lot more.
To further illustrate this point, let’s take a look at swing rates by pitch type. The four pitches below are the ones of which he has seen at least 10 this season, with swing percentages on those pitches both this season and last, per Baseball Savant.
| Pitch | 2018 Pitches | 2018 Swing % | 2017 Swing % | Normal/Abnormal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four-Seam | 96 | 52.0% | 42.7% | Normal |
| Two-Seam | 39 | 43.6% | 36.9% | Normal |
| Slider | 62 | 45.2% | 46.0% | Normal |
| Change | 23 | 47.8% | 47.4% | Normal |
There is a slight increase in swings on the fastballs, though due to the small number of pitches, the changes don’t appear that significant. Where we do notice a change is in the number of swings and misses, as seen in the table below.
| Pitch | 2018 Pitches | 2018 Whiff % | 2017 Whiff% | Normal/Abnormal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four-Seam | 96 | 24.0% | 12.0% | Abnormal (Bad!) |
| Two-Seam | 39 | 5.1% | 6.7% | Normal |
| Slider | 62 | 22.0% | 21.0% | Normal |
| Change | 23 | 26.1% | 14.6% | Normal |
This year’s results on both the slider and two-seam fastball resemble last year’s. The change seems to have… changed, but with so few pitches, it is tough to make a determination there. Where we see the biggest difference in terms of the number of whiffs from 2017 to 2018 is in the four-seam fastball. Stanton’s whiffs have doubled on the pitch, accounting for roughly two-thirds of the increase in swinging strikes compared to last year.
This is the pitch chart for Stanton’s swings on four-seam fastballs this season from Baseball Savant.

Those pink dots are the swings and misses — and there are a lot of them. Most of the misses are up in the zone, but he is clearly not swinging wildly at pitches out of the zone. He is swinging at strikes and simply missing them. It’s possible that Stanton has just faced a collection of really good pitchers with great, high velocity fastballs. For the most part, however, that hasn’t been the case. Here’s Stanton’s pitch chart showing his four-seam whiffs by velocity, again from Baseball Savant.

The average fastball velocity on Stanton’s whiffs has been just 92.1 mph. Only three of the 23 swings and misses have been on pitches above 95 mph this season. It’s possible Stanton is simply late on the fastball. His pull percentage is down from a year ago. The chart below shows Stanton’s batted balls on four-seam fastballs, per Baseball Savant.

There are a lot of pulled balls, including a bunch of homers. Stanton’s only put 11 four-seamers in play this year, but he’s pulled just four of them and none were in the air a long time.

Whatever the problem is, the result is that Stanton isn’t catching up to four-seam fastballs. At the beginning of the season, Travis Sawchik noted that Stanton had maintained the closed-off stance that had been so successful a year ago. This what that stance looks like from above.

This is what happened on that pitch:
Here’s from Tuesday night against Chris Sale:
Stanton did pull a four-seam fastball against the Red Sox in that same game, albeit one low in the zone.
Now, here is a home run from last August against Max Scherzer.
Is Stanton doing something differently from last season? If you look closely, it appears as though he might be moving his foot more directly towards the pitcher this year. Stanton starts off with a very closed stance; his performance last season indicates that the approach can work for him, obviously. In the Max Scherzer plate appearance, however, it seems to my eye that Stanton’s final step as he is swinging opens the stance just a little bit. It might be nothing or it might be that slightly opening up the stance in the swing is what helps Stanton get around on the pitch.
Regardless of the precise cause, this issue seems unlikely to affect Stanton long term. Right now, he’s behind on fastballs up in the zone. He showed last season that he is willing to make adjustments to help himself and that those adjustments have worked in the past. The only difference between normal Stanton and abnormal Stanton is about 10 fastballs. Once he takes care of those, normal Stanton should return in full force.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
Excellent article. Thorough in the borough!
They’ve got the Bronx covered. Not much on Queens.
*Thorough in the only borough that matters
Looks to me like he’s swinging harder and the iso might even support that as is the slightly off balance finish to his swing. Wonder how his exit velo, when he does make contact, compares?
First thing I thought of too. But it could be that pitchers have just been better at identifying and hitting his hole, which appears to be up in the zone.
It would have been interesting to see the year on year fastball heatmaps to see if that’s the case.
I reckon he’s just nervous and you can’t catch up to a fastball if you are at all tense. It will pass.
Most likely it will pass, even if it takes a year. NY baseball history is full of free agent signings that didn’t pan out immediately.
I find it funny that there was a “Stanton figured it all out” article after his 2 HR opening day, and now a “Stanton’s lost” article a week and a half later, from a site that generally prides itself on statistics and not relying on small sample sizes.
It’d be rather hard to maintain a readership if every day of first two months of the season featured only a new article titled “Still Early”.
Yeah I guess you are right. It’s the juxtaposition btw the 2 Stanton articles that stand out.
I was a little flip in my response, especially considering what a well written article this was. Great approach and presentation, really amazing work.
The problem maps onto the eye test, where pitchers have definitely appeared to target him up in the zone with high fastballs and he’s swung often and missed often. The Chris Sale game, and his second inning at bat against Poyner last night really crystallized this (six four-seam fastballs in a row, all but one at the very top of the zone or out, and he swung at every single one of them – the only four seamer he didnt swing at was the first pitch middle-in). Prior to reading this and re-watching his atbats, I would’ve sworn he was just missing the ball; not a timing issue as much as a guy misjudging the movement. And there was some of that (see generally, the sale clip above). But from these clips, it also looks like his timing may be off, and you’re right that his stance does appear to open up more in the clip from last season.
In the two videos, the first fastball from Danny Barnes was high and outside. Pitchcast called it on the corner; it barely scraped the edge of the plate and the catcher literally raised his glove to eye-level to catch it.
The second fastball from Chris Sale was way high, like three balls above the top of the strike zone. The catcher practically caught it at eye-level in a standing position.
Those are not pitches that anyone hits with any sort of consistency. The second pitch was of course a ball; the first pitch might be a strike, but it’s not one that a hitter wants to swing at unless there are two strikes. Obviously it was strike two in both cases, so the real question would be why he was swinging out of his heels with the pitcher ahead in the count.
It may or may not be a real problem, but those two videos are really poor examples to illustrate it. They don’t illuminate anything about Stanton’s ability to make contact because:
1. Those pitches are in awful (or as a pitcher, great) locations that hitters really shouldn’t swing at and usually result in whiffs or miserable contact anyway
2. It was strike two, which meant that Stanton might be swinging at pitches that he didn’t really want to swing at
All they tell us is that Stanton may need to improve his pitch selection (and again, it was strike two), and that maybe he should cut down on his swing when there are two strikes.
If you want to have videos that actually illustrate this problem, you really want them to be at less two strikes, and in locations that are more hittable.
In case you didn’t finish the article, there was a video of an in-the-zone fastball he manages to hit poorly. It illustrated the same observation the other two videos did.
The pitch location is much less important than the swing rhythm and step noted in the article. Besides, if you think better video will help, post some links. It surely wouldn’t hurt to see more whiffs.
And which video are you referring to exactly?
Unless I’m missing something, there are four videos in this article.
First two are the ones I commented on.
Third one is a low pitch pulled hard down the line.
Fourth one was a home run from last year.
So what bloody video are you talking about?
Abnormal Stanton sounds like something that would crawl out of the outfield drainage grates and start consuming fans.
Regarding the actual topic, he might be committing too soon, looking to hit HRs for NY: he took some very good pitches last night, right down the middle. When A-Rod would guess wrong, he would look VERY bad, and we’ve seen some of that this week from Giancarlo.
Too many AAAA pitchers in the NL.
The Yankees have faced 3 of the 10 worst staffs so far this season, and Boston. But even those poor performing teams have been able to handle Stanton.
I don’t know, I think this should come with pretty heavy qualifiers around the small sample size we’re looking at. I don’t think you can even call his rate states “abnormal” at this point by comparing them to last year/career averages. If you take any two-week sample from any player you’re bound to get rates that are outside their career averages, especially with contact rate , which I believe begins to become predictive after 100 PAs or so… and that’s one of the more quickly-stabilizing rates.
Not trying to be argumentative or overly critical, but the conclusion– that Stanton needs or should make adjustments– seems overreaching for this point in the season.
Error bars everywhere!
If you assume last season’s whiff rate, the 95% confidence interval on 116 pitches is anywhere from 25 to 45 whiffs resulting. So he’s looking a little high.
http://statpages.info/confint.html
In addition to the analysis offered by this article, perhaps the cold weather has played a role in his not being able to catch up to the heater? There is a huge difference between early April in New York and summer in Miami.
I agree. Add to that that he’s from L.A., and almost his whole life has been lived in warm places.
You could imagine that there’s data on that. He’s played road games in early April, right ?
How much chance is there that temperature is at least *slightly* to blame? He’s been a Miami guy for so long and the abnormally cold temps have lingered this season in NY and BOS. I always wonder if there is anything the temperature really does affect, but fastball velocity and bat speed seem like obvious candidates to be sapped.
This goes way back, but I think 7-8 years ago on Fangraphs there was an article about eye level, with the take-away that shifting-eye level is often the main culprit for swinging through fastballs (where you’re not late). So my first thought on this is that Stanton’s eye level is dropping a touch as he stride forward, and that’s causing the swing throughs. I convinced myself he’s a bit more upright looking at last August, but who knows!
I’ve probably seen 90% of his AB this season, and based on observation, this is 100% on target. Pitchers are going up the ladder with fastballs and he’s not catching up. Subjectively, I feel like most of the pitches he’s crushed (and there have been a bunch) have been lower in the zone.
So is the difference in the batter or the pitchers ?
One thing that has always been consistent with Stanton is that he doesn’t fare well with same-sided hard pitching early in the season. As well, looking at base home/away splits you have to wonder if the environment (background possibly) of Yankee Stadium gives a slightly different perception with recognition that he has to get use to,
In the few seasons he’s played April-September, he has always had struggles in between feasting on the Jaime Garcia’s of the world, then at some point he recognizes more pitches to hack.
This is normal for him. The only difference is other than the Nationals he doesn’t usually start his seasons against so many good pitchers, and a few games he’s already facing bullpen flamethrowers due to poor outings by the starters.
There’s nothing wrong with him other than he’s going to need time to have rhythm against new pitchers he hasn’t seen much, in stadium with different lighting, along with being a DH vs. being focused throughout the game. The latter will have a big effect on him, but his talent is too great. I promise in 30 days we will be discussing if he could hit 50 homeruns again.