Here Are Four Hitters Primed For a Big Second Half

Bobby Witt Jr.
Peter Aiken-USA TODAY Sports

Having reached the post–All-Star break world, you may find yourself perusing various stat leaderboards trying to get a grip of who has performed to, above or below expectations. I consider myself a relatively positive person, so when somebody isn’t performing to par, I like to explore their profile in search of a hint of their previous self, or in the case of a prospect, their best future self.

For this piece, I’m going to dive into a group of these players. The criteria aren’t too strict; I’m generally looking for players who are roughly 15 points or more of wRC+ below their preseason ZiPS projection. Other than that, there is some combination of batted ball data, mechanics, and a splash of subjectivity affecting my choices. With that said, let’s jump into it, starting with a former top five prospect.

Bobby Witt Jr.: 99 wRC (year-to-date) vs. 114 wRC+ (preseason ZiPS)

I am still all the way in on Bobby Witt Jr. Visually, he shows some of the key signs that I look for in an adaptable/strong hitter. For one, his rotation is clean even when he isn’t raking. He doesn’t over-rotate or over-commit with his lower body, and his swings don’t look high effort despite him hitting the ball consistently hard. But in the first few months of the season, his bat path looked limited, with his hands shooting into the zone without creating any depth to give the barrel space to get on plane. Toward the end of June, though, it looked like he was turning a corner, and he continued that improved production until the break.

Let’s look at a swing from May and another from later in June:

What I see is a hitter who slightly adjusted the way both his arms are working together. The scientific person may think of this as the relationship between horizontal bat angle (angle relative to front line of home plate), vertical bat angle (vertical angle of bat at contact), and the angle between both arms at contact. A more traditional thought would be for a hitter to cue a different movement with their lead elbow or better engage their top or bottom hand. Simply put, Witt is creating better loft with his bat at the right position in the strike zone to drive meatball fastballs like this one from Reese Olson. If Witt can continue to focus on creating the right angles with his upper body, I’m confident his breakout will come soon.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Austin Riley: 105 wRC+ (year-to-date) vs. 140 wRC+ (preseason ZiPS)

There probably aren’t many folks that are worried about Austin Riley, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t worth discussing. It would have been fair to expect him and his MVP teammate, Ronald Acuña Jr., to be neck-and-neck in terms of total offensive production; Riley’s preseason ZiPS projection was a 140 wRC+, and Acuña’s was a 143 wRC+. But while the latter has taken off, the former has taken an unexpected step back. Do not fear, though; I do not expect this to continue. Below are two heat maps detailing Riley’s swing rates last year compared to this one:

The story is clear: Riley isn’t attacking in the heart of the zone nearly as much as he did last year when he had a .255 ISO and .468 xwOBACON, with both those numbers trailing behind this year (.181 ISO and .426 xwOBACON). His swing still looks great, and his pull rate, groundball rate, and SweetSpot% haven’t dropped off enough to make me think that his swing has undergone any worrisome change, so I’m confident this is an aggression situation. Coming out of the break, I think Riley will be closer to his 2022 82% Heart Swing% than this year’s 73%.

Rafael Devers: 116 wRC+ (year-to-date) vs. 142 wRC+ (preseason ZiPS)

Rafael Devers is having a confusing season. If I didn’t tell you he had a 116 wRC+ on the year and you looked at all his other numbers, you would probably think that this is his best statistical season yet (not including defense or baserunning). His .239 ISO is nearly a career high, and his 20 home runs put him on track to challenge his career best of 38 from 2019. His HardHit% is slightly up, and his walk-to-strikeout rate is the same as his previous two years combined. So what gives?

To start, the difference between his xwOBA (.379) and wOBA (.345) is not insignificant. Some of that can be explained by a career low .267 BABIP — .314 is his career average — but it is still perplexing to see. His xwOBACON has increased by .027 points, and his barrel rate has increased by 1.8 percentage points. If we zoom in even more and look at the percentage of his hard hits within the sweet spot range (8–32 degrees), it gets even more confusing: 2021 (49.1%), 2022 (41.6%), 2023 (45.6%). This just seems like a better hitter who has run into a ton of bad luck. Stay the course with Devers; he might be one of the league’s best in the second half.

Anthony Volpe: 89 wRC+ (year-to-date) vs. 108 wRC+ (preseason ZiPS)

You might be confused seeing a rookie hitter with an 89 wRC+ on this list, but I’m confident that there aren’t many folks out there who have watched more Anthony Volpe swings and at-bats than I have. After a grueling first two and a half months of his career, the Yankees shortstop made a mechanical adjustment and has seen a significant improvement since. Here is the difference in Volpe’s swing from before and after his change, respectively:

It is so difficult to cover the outer third of the plate if your first move as a right-handed hitter is toward third base. In the swing against Jalen Beeks, Volpe is bailing too soon in his swing. In this case, it resulted in a weak rolled over groundball, but against righties, it’s led to whiff after whiff on sliders away. It’s a hole that can be exposed by many types of pitchers. Volpe knew this and adjusted by closing off his stance. I know the camera angles are different, but Tampa Bay’s gives a perfect view of how extreme Volpe’s stepping in the bucket had gotten. Since he made this change in the middle of June, he has a 150 wRC+ and 23.6 K% compared to an abysmal 71 wRC+ and 30.3 K% before. Don’t get me wrong: there is still vulnerability here with a well-located slider from a right-hander. But the adjustment has made it more manageable for Volpe to see these pitches and hurt mistakes if they’re left in the middle of the plate.

I considered several other hitters this exercise: Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (whom Jay Jaffe covered last week), Teoscar Hernández, Spencer Torkelson, and Triston Casas. But for one reason or another, the four hitters I discussed stood out to me above the rest. There is so much randomness in this sport, which makes it easy to freak out when you’re watching your guy every day and not seeing the results you want. This is a reminder that this particular group of hitters is going to be alright.





Esteban is a contributing writer at FanGraphs. One of his main hobbies is taking dry hacks every time he sees a bat.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Lunch AngleMember since 2016
3 years ago

I can’t for the life of me see any difference in the preparation or swing mechanics of the two Witt swings

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Lunch Angle

I have a hard time seeing differences in the swings of any of these guys, but I think that’s because the angle of the ball is all I remember after it hits the bat.

Jason MergottMember since 2017
3 years ago

This is 100% the type of content I come to Fangraphs for. Terrific work, Esteban!

I think Riley being viewed as a slight disappointment so far this season is more the product of his own doing last year. His numbers this year are essentially identical to last season, if you exclude a July 2022 run when he hit 6 HR in 8 games (a run he’s unlikely to repeat again).

Otherwise, he’s trucking right along, hitting 5-6 HR per month and hitting close to .270. He’s a .270 / 30-33 HR. He’s remarkably consistent.

TKDCMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  Jason Mergott

I certainly hope this is not who Riley is. While I’m not surprised to see him come down from his career high 142 wRC+ (and 136 in 2021), 105 is not great at all for a defensively questionable player owed $200 million.

The projections on FG have him between 123-132, which seems reasonable to me. He does also seem to have improved a bit on defense, both by the number and the eye test. Now he just needs to put it all together.

TKDCMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  Jason Mergott

I doubt anyone comes back to these comments at this point, but Riley just hit 6 homers in 5 games. I find that hilarious.

JonathanGaltMember since 2025
3 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

I came back to mention the same thing. All Riley managers thank you Jason.

Jason MergottMember since 2017
3 years ago

One hitter I’d like to see a deeper dive on is Trea Turner. K% is way up (18% to 24%), FB% is up and he’s yet to hit a ball north of 110 MPH this season.

Is there something he’s doing mechanically that could be tweaked for a strong second half? Or is it more a product of getting paid and relying more on his raw talent, as opposed to putting in the extra prep work?

His chase% is up and contact% is down. It’s perpetuating itself with fewer pitches in the zone.

What are your thoughts? Is there a 2nd-half rebound here?

padraic
3 years ago
Reply to  Jason Mergott

Yes, I’m kind of surprised that more has not been made of a top-5 position player totally cratering. Surface level observation screams that he is pressing, and Eduardo Perez tried pointing out something about his swing level, but I haven’t seen a definitive “this is why Trea Turner is not good anymore” piece.

newsenseMember since 2020
3 years ago

It’s only mentioned for Devers but these are all hitters whose wOBA is notably lower than their xwOBA

Shirtless George Brett
3 years ago
Reply to  newsense

Yeah this was my thought as well. Like I’m sure Witt has made slight adjustments during the season but the biggest thing is going to be just not having terrible batted ball luck. At one point I think there was a 100 point gap between his wOBA and xwOBA (currently xWOBA is .364 compared to his .316 wOBA)

runningfrog
3 years ago

When you look at Witt’s Statcast info, last year his xBA, xSLG, and xWOBA were all functionally identical to his realized BA, SLG, and WOBA.

This season his xBA, xSLG, and xWOBA are all way, way, way up from last year, but his BA, SLG, and WOBA are all the same as last year.

Hard to believe he won’t correct some of that discrepancy in the second half.

Last edited 3 years ago by runningfrog
brettkvasMember since 2022
3 years ago
Reply to  runningfrog

He’s hitting the cover off the baseball. Exit velos of 101.7, 109.7, 110.3, and 110.6 yesterday

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
3 years ago

BABIP and the inherent luck that is such a huge part of baseball can distort the way a player’s performance is perceived by all but the most avid follower. It takes some searching to find the hard hit ball percentage or whether the wind held up 5 balls that fell on the running track instead of reaching the stands. Assuming 25 AB’s a week, just one blooper falling in or one topped roller down the line means .040 in batting average. Raffy Devers, who with his 2 bombs tonight, has 22 with 72 RBI’s. and I don’t give a hoot whether the numbers say one thing or the opposite, except to say that I am very happy he plays for the team I have rooted for over the past 75 years.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Brings to mind that Crash Davis monologue

SculpinMember since 2025
3 years ago

Appreciate the upbeat assessment of Austin Riley, he lost his starting job on my shallow league team to Josh Jung but I could use him at UTIL if he hits a little better in the second half.

How the heck should I value Cody Bellinger going forward? He is a fantasy stud so far this year when he has been playing, but statcast thinks he is well below replacement level. I have to cut either him or Marcell Ozuna, a statcast darling with inferior fantasy numbers. The forecasts just wash away the differences, so they are not much help (they both have WRC+ numbers around 105).

nktokyo
3 years ago

I’d add Wander Franco to that list, and his first half was pretty good.

tm257155
3 years ago

I think looking into mechanics from the Twisting model point of view would be simpler. For example as far as comparison of two swings above, difference of the Witt swings would be “bat drawing” to generate power (check point 2). And for the Volp swings, simply gap between hitting direction and Heso-vector (check point 3).
And for the top picture, I think grip position is not recommended. FYI.

https://note.com/twistingmodel/n/nef457db9a78b

T.Inohiza

tm257155
3 years ago
Reply to  Esteban Rivera

My pleasure. In my opinion, Conventional Rotational model, which assume only collision between ball and bat (that’s why it only counts bat speed), is not satisfactory to explain baseball hitting. Twisting model assume collision between ball and bat with player (that’s why it consider both bat momentum and force from the player.

https://sabr.org/journal/article/hitting-mechanics-the-twisting-model-and-ted-williamss-the-science-of-hitting/

When it was published it was assumption but in these days, I observe many NPB players introduced this mechanics to be powerful.

Hope this study is helpful.

T.Inohiza

tm257155
3 years ago
Reply to  Esteban Rivera

Esteban-san
By the way I tweeted Shohei before (2020) and after (2021).
Please use Google translation.

Happy baseball.

T.Inohiza

johndarc
3 years ago

Thank you for not engaging in chicken parm discourse.

sandwiches4everMember since 2019
3 years ago
Reply to  johndarc

Wat. I came to the comments specifically for the chicken parm discussion, and would have added it myself.

I think the biggest thing observationally about Volpe since the Italian dinner heard ’round New York is that he is just straight up whiffing a lot less. He had a couple swings yesterday where he was juuuuust off on a pitch.