How Corey Dickerson Erased a Weakness
PITTSBURGH — Corey Dickerson had a weird offseason.
After being named an All-Star last year and finishing with an 115 wRC+, 27-homer, three-win campaign, Dickerson was designated for assignment by Tampa Bay in February. You don’t see that every day. The always cost-conscious Rays did not want to be on the hook for $5.9 million. The Pirates acquired him for Daniel Hudson, minor-league infielder Tristan Gray, and cash considerations. Perhaps the Rays were also concerned about Dickerson’s issues against the fastball.
Last season, no batter swung and missed at elevated fastballs more often than Dickerson. In an age when spin and “rise” are better understood than ever, perhaps the Rays thought Dickerson would be vulnerable to a general trend, to say nothing of specific scouting reports. Maybe the Rays felt this was an uncorrectable flaw. The club eventually acquired C.J. Cron, who offered roughly similar production at a cheaper price — without the same kind of weaknesses against the fastball.
Dickerson swung and missed at 102 of 291 total four-seamers in the upper third or above the zone last year, according to Baseball Savant data, a rate of 35.1%. Here is one of this occasions:
Against elevated fastballs this season, though? He’s whiffed just 14 times on 112 such pitches. That’s just 12.5% of them.
When offering at a four-seam fastballs last year, Dickerson whiffed at a 32.6% rate.
This season? A 14.1% rate.
In fact, Dickerson has enjoyed the greatest strikeout decline among batters with at least 500 plate appearances last year and 200 this season. And it’s not close:
| Rank | Name | K% Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corey Dickerson | -13.1 |
| 2 | Trevor Story | -7.5 |
| 3 | Nick Markakis | -6.8 |
| 4 | Andrelton Simmons | -6.3 |
| 5 | Travis Shaw | -5.8 |
| 6 | Max Kepler | -5.5 |
| 7 | Ian Kinsler | -5.2 |
| 8 | Eugenio Suarez | -5.1 |
| 9 | Alcides Escobar | -4.1 |
| 10 | Khris Davis | -3.9 |
| 11 | Javier Baez | -3.8 |
| 12 | Marcell Ozuna | -3.5 |
| 13 | Logan Morrison | -3.5 |
| 14 | Jay Bruce | -2.9 |
| 15 | Jose Peraza | -2.9 |
While the Pirates’ outfield has become crowded with the call-up and impressive play of Austin Meadows, Dickerson has elevated his stock and carved out a future role in Pittsburgh (or perhaps elsewhere) with a remarkable 2018 transformation.
He’s cut his strikeout rate from 24.2% last year (21.4% career) to 11.3% this season. He enters play with a 120 wRC+, an improvement not only over last year but also his career average mark (120 wRC+).
After ranking among the worst high-fastball hitters in the game for multiple seasons, Dickerson has suddenly erased that weakness. Jeff Sullivan examined this trend in early May and Dickerson has since kept the gains.
When I covered the Pirates as a newspaperman, one of their philosophies when it came to prospects was that it was better to target a hit-tool first over power, the idea being that power could be more easily developed while bat-to-ball skills were more innate. What’s interesting is that Dickerson has dramatically improved his hit tool — and in short order.
In Pittsburgh last week, I asked Dickerson just how he pulled this off.
“It would get too deep for you,” said Dickerson, breaking into a grin before his locker.
Humor me, I pleaded.
“I’m all about change,” Dickerson said. “Looking at the analytics, I saw that I swung through a lot of fastballs… I kind of went to it myself. ‘How could I get better?’ It’s a trail… With how good my hand-eye [coordination] is, there’s no reason why I should take big cuts and miss those opportunities, because I have a really good two-strike approach.”
In seeing how much swing and miss he had against fastballs, Dickerson decided to trade in power for contact.
“What I used to do is swing real hard and foul off [or miss] a lot of fastballs,” Dickerson said. “I started thinking about how good of a hitter I am inside the zone… If I don’t foul off a lot of those fastballs, or pitches earlier in the count, how much better could I be? I found a way of shortening up. Choking up. I’ve never choked up in my career except a few times with two strikes here and there. Spreading out… Now I have a better chance to make contact earlier in count.”
Dickerson used to rarely choke up. Now he chokes up often in all counts:
Compare 2017…

… to 2018:

Dickerson also discussed how he “manipulates” his body.
“I hit in different stances,” Dickerson said. “I kind of spread put, or stand up, depending on the pitcher and the movement of his pitches.”
Consider Dickerson against ground-ball specialist Scott Alexander last week. Notice how he gets into more of a crouch:

Then consider Dickerson against Derek Holland, who is a fly-ball pitcher. Dickerson stands more upright.

The result of these adjustments is that Dickerson has come up empty far less often. Consider his contract-per-swing rate against fastballs.
In 2017…

… and 2018:

“I’m starting to take more pitches,” Dickerson said, “to be more selective outside the zone… I don’t think about homers. Maybe it’s risk vs. reward. Maybe my homers will go down, but my strikeouts will go down. My overall production is [improved], more contact.”
As Dickerson notes, the result might occasionally be more modest contact, but contact nonetheless:
And the data indicate that Dickerson certainly is swinging at fewer pitches above the zone, and out of the zone, compared to a year ago:
Here’s 2017:

And 2018:

Dickerson also studied video this offseason, looking at some of the game’s best hitters — Barry Bonds, Miguel Cabrera — to try and replicate some of their swing path.
“Hand placement, bat path, being on plane a long time,” Dickerson said. “Being super short to the ball.”
This has all allowed Dickerson to evolve in an unlikely way. He’s the rare hitter who has dramatically changed his hit tool. We don’t see that every day, but Dickerson offers evidence that perhaps it’s a skill that more hitters could change if being honest with themselves after evaluating their strengths and weaknesses. As baseball has zagged, Dickerson has zigged like no other hitter.
A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.
So I think it’s useful to think about all the different parts of a hit tool. Eric and Kiley have both written about this, and how some parts of hit tools are easier to correct than others. I think this is a good one:
https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/scouting-the-hit-tool-pt-1/
Of the list Kiley has here, Dickerson has always had: (1) athleticism, (2) bat speed, and (3) a feel for the bat head. Especially #3. What he didn’t have was (4) a great plan at the plate, and that’s a big part of what he worked on. I don’t really think it’s crazy that someone improved their approach at the plate. I also don’t think it’s that crazy that he improved his mechanics (I mean, every player with good mechanics today had worse mechanics at some point).
The thing that is hardest to improve–feel for the bat head–was Dickerson’s biggest strength. So he had a lot to work with. A lot of hitters don’t have that (nor, frankly, do they have an approach that was as bad as Dickerson’s was before).
I was sad to see him leave Colorado. Walt Weiss always said Corey could roll out of bed on Christmas Day and go 2-4.
After all the Pearl clutching following the Rizzo slide, is anyone going to write about how the pirates lead the league in HBP every year? Probably not cuz raw sewerage is unassailable here.
https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=0&type=0&season=2018&month=0&season1=2018&ind=0&team=0,ts&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=20,d
https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=0&type=0&season=2018&month=0&season1=2012&ind=0&team=0,ts&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=20,d
We also lead the league in our guys getting hit.
Also, wth did Searage have to do with Rizzo’s illegal slide?
Coincidentally, I’m fairly certain the author of this article wrote a book that mentioned that exact thing.
What does it feel like to be this way?
It’s amazing how quickly Pirates fans have shifted from “angry that Cutch was traded” to “angry that Cutch was replaced by a guy Tampa Bay DFA’d” to “excited at how great Dickerson is” to “angry that the Pirates will probably trade Dickerson in July or this offseason.”
It was a stunning miscalculation by Tampa Bay and definitely Neal Huntington’s strongest move in recent years, and it sounds like it was driven entirely by Dickerson having the humility to understand he had a flaw and then to put in the work to address it. It’s also worth noting that he’s be above average defensively, so the Pirates have gained a ton of defensive value with Marte taking over center from Cutch and Dickerson competently replacing Marte’s glove in left. Good stuff!
I kinda wonder if they would consider keeping Dickerson and dealing Polanco and his long term deal to a team that believes. the frustration fans feel with Polanco has to be magnified for the front office.
I’m not sure what team would be interested in him. Guys who used to be 2-WAR players but are now inexplicably below replacement level aren’t exactly in high demand, especially since he’s signed for about 3/$24 million from 2019-2021. The best bet would be to trade him for someone else who is paid about the same amount and is also struggling. Jason Kipnis? Bryan Shaw?
Polanco has also increased his hard-hit percentage and flyball percentage, but seen his BABIP crater. I’d wager he should have a few more homeruns and more average, and in particular any team that doesn’t have a park with PNC-like dimensions should be very interested in Polanco.
I don’t know what is going on with him, but his BABIP cratering, him suddenly turning into a terrible defender, and suddenly becoming a subpar baserunner makes me wonder what the heck is going on. His sprint score is actually still okay, but maybe it’s declined from last year.
I don’t know what’s really going on, but if I were a decision-maker I wouldn’t be terribly interested in giving up anything of value to take on his salary. And even if I was, I’d have to work for a team that could take the financial risk to take him on, and that doesn’t care if they don’t win this year. What teams can give him a year to figure everything out, and if he doesn’t, not worry too much about the money? The Orioles? The Blue Jays? The White Sox?
PNC is essentially neutral for LHB for everything except triples.
I think Polanco has zero trade value at the moment- the best solution near-term is to continue working with him.
I also can’t see them extending Dickerson, either- he’ll be 30 next year and the Pirates generally avoid signing over-30 guys to market-value deals, not to mention that Jason Martin is looking very good in AA (332/388/559) and Travis Swaggerty expected to be a quick riser.
A stunning miscalculation on about 5 different levels. Tendering a contract to him only to DFA him, DFA’ing him over Miller and Hechevarria, trading him for a guy who wasn’t good enough to make the team (and eating the money they would have saved by non-tendering/DFA’ing him)…and then watching him return to an above-average hitter somewhere else.
It’s also worth noting that losing the power is a pretty big blow to his offensive output. The guy’s wRC+ is only 120, which is nothing to sneeze at but also not back to his all-star level. Although he’s got more value than Cron overall because he seems to be fine in left field, Cron is outperforming him offensively at the moment.
I agree that it was a mistake by the Rays to choose Miller over Dickerson, which is essentially what they did. That said, the Rays didn’t want Daniel Hudson in the deal. They took him bc they liked Tristan Gray, who isn’t a great prospect, but is at least interesting and has some speed and pop. It’s not as if the Rays didn’t try to deal Dickerson for a better return. There just wasn’t much interest. Dickerson had a lousy second half, he’s limited to left field, and when he throws, he looks like he’s using his nondominant hand. The mistake was trading Dickerson instead of Miller, not so much the return that the Rays got in the Dickerson deal.
So you’re saying they just paid $4.5 million for an FV35, and the part where they got rid of DIckerson didn’t matter so much? That is a very un-Rays like move. They must have at least thought he was an FV40.
I’m saying that they didn’t trade Dickerson *for* Hudson. They took Hudson to make the deal, and they did that bc they liked something about Tristan Gray. If they could have traded Dickerson for Gray straight up, I’m sure they would have done it without involving Hudson.
I was hoping for the Pirates to get Dickerson as soon as he was DFA’d and was very happy that the Pirates picked up him.
How much of Dickerson’s improvement is because he’s out of AL East?
Probably none unless you believe that 97 mph high fastballs in the NL Central are somehow worse than 97 mph high fastballs in the AL East.
Since he was 0 for 6 w/ 3Ks against Chasen Shreve, it is a pertinent question
Well, yeah but he was also 8 for 21 with 3 HRs against Masahiro Tanaka so…
(Note: ROFL)
An increased focus on contact seemed to do about what one would expect — lower swing and miss rate and lower ISO — .159 in 2018 vs .207 in 2017 and .217 Career. The overall results are about the same unless you think a 120 wRC+ in 2018 is massively better than a 115 wRC+ in 2017 or a 116 wRC+ Career. Still an interesting transformation and article.
“He’ll never hit out of Colorado.”
I’m glad he made an adjustment. In hindsight, a guy with crazy outside of zone contract rate seems like a good candidate to be able to put bat on ball in the zone too.
When I think that Erik Neander chose to roster Brad Miller over Corey Dickerson for roughly the same salary, I haz a sad.