How Far Away Are the Phillies?

The situation in Philadelphia is bleak. I don’t think that statement is going to cause a stir. The Phillies, right now, are projected by Steamer to be the worst team in baseball in the season ahead, even worse than the rival Braves. Even if you might personally find Steamer to be a waste of everyone’s time, the Phillies still look like they’re going to be bad. To make matters worse, the best pitchers are both in their 30s. The best position players are both in their 30s. The 2015 Phillies are going to have some thousands of season ticket holders, and those same season ticket holders are going to experience their own sort of adversity.

One clue as to how bad things are: the team’s own executives are saying, publicly, that the organization is years away from contention. No attempt is being made to sugarcoat the state of things. Another clue as to how bad things are: that’s what a lot of fans want to hear. They’ve longed for this acknowledgment of the need to rebuild. Fans knew some time ago the Phillies needed to change course. Now the Phillies are doing so, willingly stripping down so as to make for a better future. But, how about that future, anyway? Might we be able to figure out how long it will be until the Phillies are decent again?

The on-field product is bad. The farm system has strength at the top, but not a lot of depth. The Phillies, of course, have one thing strongly in their favor: they’ve got money. The problem lately has been spending too much of it on the wrong players, but the cash flow is there. This is a big-budget operation, and a big-budget operation should in theory be able to hasten a return to relevance.

Given what we know, let’s do a little study, trying to find some comparable teams from the past. Let’s go back as far as 1997, so I can use this handy opening-day payroll resource. The first filter: I looked for teams who won no more than 75 games in consecutive seasons. Then, out of those teams, I selected those that had a top-ten payroll in at least the second year. From there, it was just a matter of tracking future success, and I looked for the next year in which the team finished with a winning record. I think in this age with the additional wild cards, a winning record is sufficient to equal relevance and at least borderline contention.

There’s not a big group of comparable teams. Maybe you could’ve guessed as much. But at least that allows us to run through them one by one.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

…and we can start by eliminating the 1999-2000 Devil Rays. Though Tampa Bay, in 2000, went on a little bit of a spending spree, that wasn’t really indicative of the resources they had available long-term. The Devil Rays were and still remain a small-budget organization, so they don’t work as a Phillies comp.

All right! We move on to the 2000-2001 Rangers. It was the 2001 Rangers, of course, who added Alex Rodriguez. Immediately, that weakens the comp — the Phillies don’t have arguably the best player in baseball — but Texas kept spending for a few years, and just couldn’t build a winner around their shortstop. The next year, they won 72 games. The year after that, 71. But! Then they won 89. In 2004, the Rangers were competitive. Granted, they wouldn’t then finish with another winning record until 2009, but this might be a bit hopeful. This would suggest the Phillies could be good in 2017.

Next up, the 2002-2003 Mets. Those Mets mirror the Phillies fairly well: high peak, deep playoff runs, sharp decline. The Mets, in 2003, had baseball’s second-highest opening-day payroll, and they lost 95 games. The next year, they won 71 times. The next year, they won 83 times! In 2005, the Mets finished above .500. In 2006, they lost in Game 7 of the NLCS. This would put the Phillies in line to be decent again in 2016. Working in the favor of the 2005 Mets: they had a 22-year-old Jose Reyes, and a 22-year-old David Wright. That team also paid for free agents Pedro Martinez and Carlos Beltran. But, that’s money for you. The Phillies have it.

Moving on, we hit the 2004-2005 Mariners. This is another pretty good comp, as the Mariners were a real good team that got old fast. And wouldn’t you know it, but the Mariners subsequently won 78 games, and then 88 games. So within two years, the Mariners challenged for the playoffs. That would, again, line the Phillies up for a decent 2016. But it’s worth remembering that, by their statistics, the 2007 Mariners weren’t actually good. They were helped by a lot of luck. The Mariners didn’t become an actual good team until just last year. But, thanks to luck, the Mariners won more often than they lost in both 2007 and 2009. And the Phillies have more money than the Mariners did.

That takes us to the 2006-2007 Orioles. The Orioles are a fringe candidate; they only just barely made the payroll cutoff in 2007. They used to be a bigger-budget operation than they’ve been within the past decade. In 1998, they were first in payroll. In 1999, fifth. In 2000, fourth. Maybe that’s a better comp, since those were definitely bad Orioles teams. Here’s the important thing: no matter which Orioles team you think is the better comp, the Orioles only reached a winning record in 2012. They’ve been good since, but that path would put the Phillies several years away. This would be a real bad path.

And now we find the 2010-2011 Cubs. The Cubs were third in payroll in 2010. In 2011, they were sixth. They won a combined 146 games, just like the Phillies have. Now, the Cubs haven’t actually gotten back to a winning record yet. It looks like they’ll get there this coming season. If not this year, then probably next year. The point being, the Cubs seem relevant, now. That would line the Phillies up for a competitive 2018, after some years of developing excitement over the farm system. The Cubs, as you know, went through an organizational overhaul, in an effort to get smarter. The Phillies might take heed.

The remaining comps aren’t great comps. The 2011-2012 Marlins showed up, thanks to Jeffrey Loria’s spending spree, but that lasted exactly no time at all. The Marlins have gone right back to spending just about nothing. And then there are the 2012-2013 Blue Jays. The Jays immediately finished with a winning record in 2014, but they weren’t going through the same sort of process; they kept the core together, and were trying to win, with a little better performance and injury luck. They’re in pretty good shape, for the time being.

We have a very small pool, here. But we’ve gotten this far, so we might as well analyze it. The Phillies are a bad team, with money. The season ahead is almost certain to be lousy. Based on the Mariners and the Mets, the Phillies might be able to be decent again as soon as 2016. It would be 2017, based on the Rangers. Also, perhaps, based on the future money the Phillies already have on the books. The Cubs path would see the Phillies take a step forward in 2018. And the disaster scenario is represented by the Orioles. The Orioles are what happens when young players don’t develop and money continues to be spent poorly. It’s important that the Phillies don’t get stuck in too extended a period of failure, because then revenues drop, and dropping revenues makes it only more difficult to get good and stay good.

Pat Gillick has the idea, basically:

Pat Gillick offered fans some much-needed candor in the fall when he said the Phillies would not contend again until 2017 or ’18.

Gillick has not shortened his timetable.

“Yeah, maybe further out,” Gillick said on Tuesday night before the Phillies’ winter banquet at the Reading Crowne Plaza Hotel. “Maybe ’18. You need about two or three years.”

The timeline would be sped up if the Phillies could strike gold with their top prospects. If, say, Maikel Franco and J.P. Crawford could become the Phillies’ version of Wright and Reyes, well, there’s your next core, along with Aaron Nola. Maybe Domonic Brown becomes something. Maybe Cody Asche becomes something. There’s observable talent in the bullpen. Maybe good talent comes back for Cole Hamels, and maybe, who knows, the Phillies make an international splash or two. With money come advantages. The Phillies have squandered it lately, but that doesn’t guarantee it’ll repeat in the future.

The chance is there. This doesn’t have to be several consecutive years of lousy baseball. But, most teams don’t strike gold with all their top prospects. And as far as the Cubs are concerned, this new era has come about thanks to a whole new front office. The Phillies know there’s a way out of this. They just can’t know yet if they’re on it.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

117 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Sean C
11 years ago

Yoan Moncada makes all sorts of sense for the Phillies, no?

Tim
11 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

How about Jason Heyward next year as a free agent?

OF is a large area of need and he’s so young for a FA that even though the signing wouldn’t line up with the Phillies competitive window, his age would. Possibly could be had at a cheaper rate than comparable 2017-2019 FAs, too.

Phillies113
11 years ago
Reply to  Tim

Jason Heyward fell in love with St. Louis so quickly that he and the Cardinals are already talking an extension. I can’t imagine he’d want to give up the relatively friendly environs of Busch Stadium for the considerably more hostile atmosphere at Citizen’s Bank Park, anyways.

Heyward ain’t happenin’.

Bill
11 years ago
Reply to  Tim

Big free agent signings are a bad idea until contention is in sight and not more than a season away.

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  Tim

It’s a tad premature to talk about this love affair between Heyward and the Cards considering he’s played exactly 0000 games and had 0000 at-bats in a StL uniform. Players (and teams) can sour quickly if he disappoints.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
11 years ago
Reply to  Tim

#BFIB

Free_AEC
11 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

So why wasn’t Yoan Moncada addressed in your article?

Are you unaware that the Phillies have left over a million dollars unspent in this years July 2nd signing period?

If you add up the Phillies last four highest paid signing bonuses in the July 2nd signing period you get a figure under $3 million. The Rangers paid Nomar Mazara $5 million to sign.

“But, that’s money for you. The Phillies have it.”

Having money and using that money to buy players are two very different things.

The Phillies do not buy players. This ownership group over the past 34 years have bought two impact starting players, Jim Thome and Cliff Lee.

34 Years of this ownership group

The Phillies boycott the free agent market. Nothing but old men on short contracts or dumpster diving for Grady Sizemore and Chad Billingsley.

Obviously the Phillies should have signed Hanley Ramirez to play 3B. It was instead the Red Sox. The Phillies had no interest. Darin Ruf is somehow a “prospect” even though he is two weeks older than Pablo Sandoval. Oh yeah, the Red Sox signed the Panda too. Was it the Red Sox who got $6 Billion from Comcast or was it the Phillies?

Did I mention that the Phillies boycott the free agent market?

In the 1990’s, after the 1993 WS appearance, David Cone publicly expressed interest in coming to Philadelphia to join Curt Schilling at the top of the Phillies rotation. The Phillies wouldn’t even talk to Cone who then went on to win a ring with the Yankees.

The Phillies also boycott Scott Boras. Yeah, no one but me will address this issue. The Phillies have never signed a Scott Boras client.

NEVER.

Never is a long time. Scott Boras controls more MLB talent than the Dominican Republic or Cuba, more than both actually. If you’re interested in winning then boycotting Scott Boras is about the dumbest thing you can do, even the Pirates and Royals gave up on following that path, not the Phillies though.

Wouldn’t Matt Wieters be the perfect solution to the Phillies hole at catcher next winter? Sure.

Guess who Matt Wieters agent is?

Oh well, more important to keep the war going against Scott Boras.

When Bill Giles father was President of the National League there was no free agency in MLB.

Figure it out yet?

Jason Heyward? Sure, but that’s going to be a loooooooong contract.

Sorry, the Phillies won’t go more than three years for a young outfielder, maybe four. Heyward is getting at least eight years.

The Phillies refuse to sign anyone to an eight year contract.

Your article does nothing at all to address this malignant problem with the Phillies ownership.

Anyone who is interested in the malignancies that plague the Phillies should read my blog which is almost exclusively centered on this subject. My blog also has the real rebuilding plan the Phillies are following, one they will never reveal. It will only be revealed as it unfolds over time as the Phillies return to contention date moves further and further into the future, a date internally that is understood. Publicly John Middleton through his hired stooges continue to dump LIES on the public.

I can guarantee you there is no one in the Phillies front office who thinks this team is going to win their division again before 2024. There will be no Moncada, no Heyward, no Wieters. All the talent will be drafted for nothing in the June MLB Plantation Slave Auction televised on the MLB Network.

The Phillies do not buy players.

THAT

is

The Phillies Way
_

Bob
11 years ago
Reply to  Free_AEC

I’d rather read comments on ESPN articles than your blog.

Dan
11 years ago
Reply to  Free_AEC

Without knowing the merits of your arguments, I have to say that yours is one of the most obnoxious writing styles I have ever come across. Your tone is needlessly sarcastic and antagonistic. If you have good points to make, just make them. Don’t make assumptions about what the reader personally believes, or highlight and repeat everything as though you’re shouting every other word. Nobody wants to read that.

PillsburyFlowboyMember since 2024
11 years ago
Reply to  Free_AEC

You are a dumb person.

Eric
11 years ago

Ooooo! Ooooo! Pick me, pick me! I know the answer to this question. How far away are the Phillies? So far away that they need a wormhole to get there….

Hurtlocker
11 years ago
Reply to  Eric

Set your phasers on stun…..

Nate Davis
11 years ago

None of those other teams had Ruben Amaro.

Yirmiyahu
11 years ago
Reply to  Nate Davis

Ding ding. The timeline speeds up if they get a smart GM. The timeline slows down (stops?) if they keep him around.

DatDudeJD
11 years ago
Reply to  Nate Davis

This is the correct answer. Amaro will hang onto Hamels until he is a corpse on the disabled list or lobbing the ball to the mound.

Step 1 for rebuild = fire Amaro

Bill Bavasi
11 years ago
Reply to  Nate Davis

One of them had me, though!

AC
11 years ago
Reply to  Bill Bavasi

Yep, the one that was specifically called out as being lucky to get where they were.

The other thing that might hold the Phillies back is that free agency itself has changed in the last few years. Superstars hitting the market just doesn’t happen as much these days. Maybe in a few years there will be a swing on the other direction, but money alone won’t help if there aren’t any decent options on the market. If you can’t draft or trade well, you don’t stand a chance. And as Nate says, Ruben Amaro.

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  AC

One thing that may somewhat offset the reduction in stars on the market is teams’ increased willingness to trade stars. I really can’t say if this is different now than it used to be, but it seems to me like it might be easier to get a star player in a trade the year before free agency, and then extend him if desired. Of course this is a higher price to pay than just a free agent signing because you also have to give up value in the trade, but I feel that if you include these players, the pool might not be as small as it appears.

Plus, with player salaries inflating like they are, there will always be small market teams with stars that they can’t keep. I think most of these teams understand that it helps them much more to trade these players rather than just let them hit the market.

Dovif
11 years ago
Reply to  AC

That does not help the Phillies either as they have a bottom 10 farm and apart from Crawford, very few player with upside of an above average regulars and Franco looked horrible last year

Bobby Ayala
11 years ago
Reply to  Bill Bavasi

Bavasi: Mariner fans will never forget.

The Jam Man
11 years ago
Reply to  Nate Davis

Years of questionable decisions does not erase what has been undeniably a rough few years of Reuben at the helm. This pains me to say this, but since the Roberto Hernandez trade he hasn’t been all that bad. It is most likely Gillic coming back to mentor him, but either way he has done a decent job a rebuilding thus far. I would like more position prospects, but the reality is we need help all around the diamond in the minors.

Yirmiyahu
11 years ago
Reply to  The Jam Man

Saying that a GM “hasn’t been all that bad” for 5 months isn’t saying much, when success/failure can’t properly be determined for years.

Bobby Ayala
11 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

Also, fire-sales are about the easiest thing for a GM to do.

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

Sure, but to do well? You can sell off your players to whoever will take them, or you can use some creativity and actually make deals that really work for you.

a eskpert
11 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

Which he hasn’t done.

Dovif
11 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

Getting 3-4 prospect with no3-4 upside if everything goes right is a bit meh. Even if cole stays and all those prospect developes, they still probably have the worst sp in the east

Harry
11 years ago

“The Phillies, right now, are projected by Steamer to be the worst team in baseball in the season ahead, even worse than the rival Braves.”

What do you mean by “even worse than the rival Braves”?

Sean C
11 years ago
Reply to  Harry

Probably that they the Braves are not a very good team.

http://www.fangraphs.com/depthcharts.aspx?position=Standings

tz
11 years ago
Reply to  Harry

Uh, the Braves are in the same division. And they currently suck.

KCDaveInLA
11 years ago
Reply to  Harry

They just gave Nick Markakis about $30M and 2 years too much…of the three outfielders on their depth chart, they were forced to keep the worst one…offensively, their infield beyond Freeman is a joke…their starting rotation is meh, and except for Kimbrel, their bullpen is an adventure…that’s how bad.

G-foz
11 years ago
Reply to  KCDaveInLA

Everybody is pooping on the braves but I see a really good young high ceiling rotation. A nip here and a tuck there and they will be back in contention in 2 years.

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  G-foz

Sure, but if you read the article, the Phillies might be in contention in 2 years. Saying a team might be good in 2 years isn’t saying much, especially for a generally young team like the Braves.

tz
11 years ago
Reply to  G-foz

And with today’s signings of Kelly Johnson and Jonny Gomes, they’ve filled the #2 and cleanup spots in their everyday lineup.

YAY!

Dovif
11 years ago
Reply to  G-foz

High ceiling rotation. One which would not be better than the Nationals, mets or Marlins even if everything went right?

Bat
11 years ago
Reply to  KCDaveInLA

KCDaveinLA –

Andrelton Simmons is a joke???

He didn’t have a great 2014, but I think he’ll rebound in 2015 and more importantly so does Steamer.

Even if he isn’t great in 2015, he’ll play the whole season at age 25 and I think he’s got a lot of good baseball left.

tz
11 years ago
Reply to  Bat

He’ll definitely hit 5th in this year’s Braves lineup. And if Gomes is toast, or isn’t playing, he’ll probably bat cleanup.

Billy
11 years ago
Reply to  Bat

I think KCDaveinLA meant just offensively. He’s a good all around player, but that’s mostly from his glove. The bat’s no great shakes as things currently stand.

awalnohaMember since 2017
11 years ago
Reply to  Harry

Perhaps the umbridge comes from the fact that the Braves are the new standard for bad teams. I thought it was and odd way to quantify how bad they are as well. Tho the Braves are going to stink, no doubt anout it.

TKDC
11 years ago
Reply to  awalnoha

The Braves haven’t been bad (aside from 2008) since the first Bush administration. The fact that they are projected to be bad is a fresh occurrence, it’s got more pizzazz than just dumping on the Astros.

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

They’re also trending downward, while the Mets and Marlins, though still not particularly good, may be getting better.

TKDC
11 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

The Braves have 3 top 50 trade assets, and after this year, minimal dead weight. Honestly, as a Braves fan, I’d rather they kept Heyward, not signed Markakis, traded gattis for a decent upgrade at LF/2B and hoped that a .500ish projected team played well Royals style. Who wants to watch a team suck? But the long term surplus value and ending bad contracts make this likely a short dip for the Braves. I’d bet on an over .500 team in ”16 (like 83-79).

StroShow
11 years ago

They’re as far away from contention as a new GM. Once they get rid of that problem, they’ll be a lot closer.

Last year, there were several good GMs who seemed to change places, and the Phillies would have been really intelligent if they’d fired RAJ then and tried to woo Friedman or something. Now it’s too late and that ship has sailed, who could they even hire?

That should have been the article. “Who would make the best new Phillies GM?”

emdash
11 years ago
Reply to  StroShow

By all accounts, Gillick has taken over a more active role in management of the Phillies’ front office. He’s got an excellent track record.

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  emdash

This reminds me of what happened to the Dodgers. The new ownership brought in Stan Kasten, who wasn’t the GM, but after that point Colletti’s moves seemed to have a bit more restraint to them. That ended up being the beginning of the end for Colletti.

Gin and Bourjos
11 years ago
Reply to  StroShow

They could pick a random poster in the FG comments section and do better than Amaro.

Jason B
11 years ago

I dunno, we have our own versions of RAJ ’round here (both literally and figuratively!)

Well-Beered Englishman
11 years ago

Can we all take a moment to fantasize about what if a team ownership decided to hire the FanGraphs collective en masse as their new management?

StroShow
11 years ago

We could decide every transaction by Straw poll. No cheaters allowed! Only vote once!

Phillies113
11 years ago

I feel like a lot of effort would be put into trying to acquire Mookie Betts at all costs.

Jason B
11 years ago

Probably worth it, I hear he’s Rickey Henderson.

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago

I don’t know what that would look like, but I do know we’d never sign a single free agent because we’d underbid on everyone. Maybe we’d have an offense headlined by Chase Headley and Nori Aoki.

a eskpert
11 years ago

The Fangraphs commentor MLB team would always have the highest war/payroll, but never the highest war.

Billy
11 years ago

Honestly, do the commenters here really believe they’d make a better GM than RAJ? Gun to your heads, would you bet on that?

I have no doubt that many (most?) of us are Amaro’s better when it comes valuation and understanding of the talent of MLB players. But what about dealing with players’ agents? Or running a farm system and developing young players? Or maybe even working with a manager and on field personnel? How about dealing with the media? Or ownership? He must be damn good at that last one since he still has his job. I’m not saying he’s a great GM, but sometimes the cocky, smarty-pants “haha, I’m smarter than Ruben Amaro Jr.” comments on here get a pretty old.

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  Billy

I think most of us (hopefully) would surround ourselves with bright and talented baseball minds and listen to them a lot.

And also consult Banknotes Industries a lot.

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  Billy

Also “damn good since he still has a job” is perhaps the single worst defense of RAJ one can possibly come up with (or anyone else for that matter). If his boss thinks he’s a swell guy, then that may be enough to keep him employed in perpetuity, results be damned. I would venture to say that we ALL know at least one person who outright sucks at their jobs and remains gainfully, inexplicably employed for any number of reasons.

JKB
11 years ago

Brilliant idea, most of us would do it for free to prove our value… And then test the market

Tim
11 years ago

The Tigers went from 100+ game losers to the World Series in three years. I think it’s pretty safe to say any team in baseball is always 3 years away from competing. Especially in the age of the second wildcard.

The Phils have large spending capabilities, tons of money coming off the books, two top-5 picks coming their way, a blue-chip trade piece and a solid foundation of a minor’s system that could look great with the addition of those high draft picks and Hamels’ return.

With basically no payroll commitments in 2018 and a willingness to approach the luxury tax threshold, they’ll have to do a lot of things wrong to not be competitive by 2018.

Unapologetic Observer
11 years ago
Reply to  Tim

With basically no payroll commitments in 2018 and a willingness to approach the luxury tax threshold, they’ll have to do a lot of things wrong to not be competitive by 2018.

Will RAJ still be GM? If so, don’t count out his ability to do a lot of things wrong 🙂

j6takish
11 years ago

The Tigers had money to spend for sure but they also had young Verlander and Granderson coming up the pipeline and several shrewd trades (polanco, guillen) which I dont think RAJ is capable of pulling off

Mac
11 years ago
Reply to  j6takish

Another great example is the Giants, who have won the World Series 3 times now despite massive payroll commitments to albatrosses. They were still under the Zito contract in ’10 and ’12. Then in ’14 they did it again despite paying Lincecum and Cain almost $40 million for -0.5 WAR production.

Is drafting luck or skill? Debatable, but it’s amazing what a solid core can do for you when you also have oodles of money to throw around.

Tim
11 years ago

My bigger concern would be is “Montgomery still president?”

RAJ has been doing a lot of things right as of late with Gillick looking over his shoulder.

nerf
11 years ago
Reply to  Tim

Yeah, but… they’re the Phillies.

Pirates Hurdles
11 years ago
Reply to  Tim

*Any team with significant payroll capacity

You aren’t going to go from terrible to very good in 3 years without some big time MLB level additions in FA/trade, with the caveat that you don’t already have one of the game’s best farm systems.

Free_AEC
11 years ago
Reply to  Tim

The Tigers are owned by Mike Ilitch.

The Phillies are owned by some bloodsucker named John Middleton.

_

Highlight and Google: John Powers Middleton Felony Fraud

_

PillsburyFlowboyMember since 2024
11 years ago
Reply to  Free_AEC

Shut up.

Unapologetic Observer
11 years ago

How far away are the Phillies? About 1700 miles, give or take 🙂

suicide squeezeMember since 2016
11 years ago

Damn it, I was going to make this joke. I even had the Google Map link ready to go and everything. Well played.

Unapologetic Observer
11 years ago

I was having issues with my google map and was hoping it would work in time to write the joke before someone else did 🙂

Gabes
11 years ago

Rick Hahn’s quickie rebuild in Chicago might be a reasonable comp. They didn’t have a Howard-esque albatross, but they’ve also been tens of millions behind Philly in terms of payroll.

nerf
11 years ago
Reply to  Gabes

It looks good so far, but I think the jury’s still out.

Flash
11 years ago
Reply to  Gabes

So, 100+ years?

greg
11 years ago

the problem with money is that everyone has it now. So it doesn’t make the Phillies special. And unfortunately, their GM has proven incapble of spending it wisely anyway.

Pirates Hurdles
11 years ago
Reply to  greg

This is a laughable comment, at least a third of MLB teams have no ability to sign frontline FA players or retain elite big ticket talent beyond early career extensions.

Ben Markham
11 years ago

Either way he’s right. The cost of a win this offseason was $7.5M. So if you fill up a $200M payroll completely from free agency you could only by 26.7 wins, which with 48 replacement wins means you’re still under .500. Gone are the days in which you can just buy a contender. You need talent under cost control, supplemented by free agent signings.

Jack
11 years ago

Far away, I didn’t eve read this article. Maybe 10 years?

Anon21
11 years ago

“Maybe Domonic Brown becomes something.”

Like an insurance salesman, or…?

Dovif
11 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

One day in 2040, you will met an insurance salesman and he will tell you that story where he hit 20hr in a month in the major and he was better than that HoFer call trout and he was an all star, then you will go home and get on the net and look up Dominic brown

Vlad
11 years ago

Whatever amount of money needs to be included in the deal, the Phillies should trade Hamels to the Red Sox for Blake Swihart and either Brian Johnson OR Rafael Devers

Swihart can spend ’15 in Triple A, apprentice under Ruiz’s $8.5M in ’16 and be the starter in ’17.
Johnson could bolster the rotation behind Nola as a lefty. Devers is on a longer timeline, probably 2018 at the earliest, but could be an impact player at 3B.

The Phillies do have money and shouldn’t be afraid to kick it in to deals to facilitate better prospects coming back.

Timber
11 years ago
Reply to  Vlad

My vote has always been Ruiz and Hamels to Boston for Vasquez and prospect A, B, and C. Ruiz offers a little more short term value to Boston while Swihart finishes up his minor league tour, and Vasquez gives the Phillies their future catcher. Fill in the blanks for the rest of the return, but I like Cecchini, a higher floor player who is “regarded more favorably by projection systems than scouts” and a low minors high upside type (Devers/Margot?). Maybe throw in a rebound candidate like Jackie Bradley and call it a day.

James Fan
11 years ago
Reply to  Timber

I like the thinking here. And it wouldn’t require any money to change hands. Both sides happy in that the Phillies get 2 starters (50% hit rate) in 2-3 years while shedding massive amounts of salary and Boston doesn’t part with anything immediately valuable and opening up a a spot for their best prospect and increasing their ability to compete this year.

emdash
11 years ago
Reply to  Timber

Vasquez isn’t a good enough prospect to be the centerpiece of a Hamels deal that the Phillies would want to make.

Timber
11 years ago
Reply to  emdash

That “the Phillies would want to make”? Probably not. Maybe I’m more risk averse than most, but I’d prefer a few high floor, close to major league, undervalued type prospects.

Bob
11 years ago
Reply to  Timber

Thats a 3 win catcher going with Hamels. Vasquez isnt enough.

Timber
11 years ago
Reply to  Bob

I think you’re missing the point of the exercise. Vasquez is not the centerpiece for a Hamels trade. Packaging Ruiz with Hamels and getting Vasquez back just makes sense on the catching front for both teams. Boston gets a better catcher now and the Phillies fill their catcher position for the next six years. If you want to call prospects A, B, and C in that scenario Betts, Bogaerts, and Owens, that’s fine. The reason for the package deal is that I just don’t see Boston going straight up with Philly in a Vasquez for Ruiz swap.

DatDudeJD
11 years ago
Reply to  Vlad

Except the Phillies won’t kick in money. Ruben Amaro is a simple man with a simple mind. He just said Cole Hamels is one of the best pitchers in baseball, so he needs some of the best prospects in baseball back if he trades him. He does not comprehend that his current contract doesn’t leave a lot of surplus value. Amaro’s thinking is “Me have great pitcher. Me want best prospects in baseball for him! Me no care what contract is!”

Unapologetic Observer
11 years ago
Reply to  DatDudeJD

He’s the Fred Flintstone of GMs.

Phillies113
11 years ago

Ruben, Rube Amaro
He’s the smartest guy in historyyy
From the, town of Philly,
He’s about to crash into a tree….AUGHHHH

(crashes into tree)

Walter
11 years ago

Sounds like he’s actually the Cookie Monster of GMs to me.

South Park
11 years ago

Simpsons already did it.

M W
11 years ago
Reply to  DatDudeJD

He included cash in the Byrd trade and the Rollins trade, I would assume he’d do the same for Hamels, Ruiz, Howard, and Papelbon at some point in the next 6 months if it means a nicer haul of prospects.

Joe Brady
11 years ago
Reply to  Vlad

As a RS fan, no thank you.

Phillies113
11 years ago

Any comp that has the Phillies contending any earlier than 2018 is most probably incorrect. Heck, I’d estimate about 2020, personally. The Phillies are fully rebuilding, and while they may have money to spend, they have shown themselves incapable of knowing where or why to spend this money effectively. So long as Ruben Amaro Jr is in charge of player personnel decisions, I feel like it’ll be a long time before the Phillies are either good or relevant again.

Sean C mentioned Yoan Moncada earlier; that’d sure be nice. We’ll see, I suppose. For now, though, there’s lots of interesting, exciting baseball outside of the Philadelphia market that can keep me entertained for a long while.

Andy
11 years ago
Reply to  Phillies113

If they are fully rebuilding, they’ll trade Hamels and Lee (if he’s healthy). Hamels isn’t getting any better, so the only way he could get more than he could right now is to keep him until midseason and, if he’s still Hamels, pull a Shark trade on whomever is this year’s version of the A’s. That’s about all he can hope for.

Domino
11 years ago

What baffles me is the obsession over trading Hamels. Not that it couldn’t workout, but there’s a few things to keep in mind:

1) Trades of “aces” in recent history have rarely panned out into even another really good player, let alone a talent equal to the ace. There have been a few decent ones, but most go the other way. And let’s face it: do you really trust Amaro to be the one to beat the odds?
2) The commentary I constantly see about “trade Hamels for Player A & Player B” assumes players A & B reach their ceilings–which I don’t have to tell you are often lower than most of the commentators seem to believe.
3) Prospect “success” is against the odds in most cases. See studies like this one (and there are many): http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2014/7/14/5862042/mlb-prospects-iso-bb-k-javier-baez-introduction/in/5664586
4) When was the last time you saw a healthy ace, with a fair (large, but not unreasonable) contract, with 4 years of control left, traded? This isn’t a one-year or even two-year deal rental. This isn’t a guy with an albatross contract. This isn’t a guy with half an arm.
5) Given that, and the fact that the Phillies expect to contend before his contract is up, why is trading him a must?

If trading Hamels is a requirement to being good again–if not trading him means we won’t be good–then we’re in much, much deeper than we ever should have been, and this is going to take a lot longer than just a couple years.

Joe Brady
11 years ago
Reply to  Domino

The Cubs picked up a top-10 prospect and another OFer that might be fringy top-100 for Shark & Hammell.

Price fetched a #2 type SP, a top prospect playing in the pros, and a solid lower prospect.

Garza got Chris Archer.

Shields returned Myers & Odorizzi.

The NYMs cleared the table getting D’Arnaud & Syndergaard for Dickey.

You can hold onto him if you want, but as a RS fan, I was only too happy to jettison all those guys from the 2012 & 2014.

Andy
11 years ago
Reply to  Joe Brady

Half a season of Cliff Lee got Justin Smoak, Blake Beavan, and 2 other guys that didn’t do squat. The Mariners basically got those guys for free since they weren’t contending in 2010, and at the time, they had every reason to think they had pulled off a Tex deal. Except none of them broke out.

Even without kicking in cash, RAJ should be able to get something substantial for Hamels, but if he holds out too long, he’s going to have a good, not great, pitcher for a few more years, and nothing to show for him.

arc
11 years ago
Reply to  Andy

Risk is already factored into prospect valuations. You don’t get to count it twice.

Free_AEC
11 years ago
Reply to  Andy

Cliff Lee has been traded three times for eleven prospects.

They all suck.

JOHN MIDDLETON
SOLD

CURT SCHILLING -Three Rings

HUNTER PENCE – Two Rings

SCOTT ROLEN – One Ring

SHANE VICTORINO -One Ring

BOBBY ABREU
CLIFF LEE

for

VICENTE PADILLA

That’s SEVEN Rings in 14 years while the Phillies have won two World Series in 125 years.

Plucky
11 years ago
Reply to  Joe Brady

One word (well, acronym): BATNA. James Shields is unsigned, and available for ~5/100ish + the loss of a late 1st/early 2nd draft pick. Hamels will cost you 4/93 + possible vesting + whatever talent you have to give up to trade for him?. How much talent does it take to equalize that value? Sure, Hamels is the better pitcher, but not not by a huge amount. If I were a GM in win-now mode, I’d give up a top-50 but not top-10 type prospect plus a lotto ticket type for Hamels, but no more. If RAJ wanted more than that I’d just go and sign Shields.

As long as Shields remains on the market, any team who would want Hamels has a reasonably close plan B available. If RAJ really wants multiple top guys, he should offer to pay some of Hamels’s salary. In reality what he’d be doing is simply buying prospects for cash, but doing that via salary-eating is the typical way. That’s really the way to restock your system when you are cash-rich and talent-poor.

The one thing RAJ has been rational about is seeming to understand that once the season starts, his negotiating position will improve since trades are the only way to acquire real talent. Given how long the road back to contention is, waiting until June to pull the trigger is not going to hurt a rebuilding timeline. The risk he runs is Hamels getting hurt.

Timber
11 years ago
Reply to  Domino

I think the mistake in the thinking here is the notion that you need to acquire a talent that, in the future, will equal the talent of Hamels in the now. If you were to net two prospects that amounted to 2-3 WAR players, I would consider that trade a success. It also provides additional money to supplement other holes in your lineup (or help fund the contract of an ace type pitcher).

I understand there is no guarantee you will net that kind of return, but it’s a risk worth taking.

If the Phillies don’t plan on contending till 2017, you’ve just paid $48 mil for two years of a pitcher adding meaningless wins to a team in the hopes that those added wins will become meaningful for another $48 mil the following two years. In essence, you’re paying $96 mil for the wins he will provide in 2017-2018.

Trading Cole Hamels is not a must. It just makes the most sense from a rebuilding standpoint.

Walter
11 years ago
Reply to  Timber

This is exactly the right way to think about it. And by 2017-2018, Hamels is probably projecting to be a 2-2.5 win player? So, you’re spending $96M over 4 years to get 4-5 meaningful WAR?

The idea really should be to cash him in for as much as possible and to be willing to send money upfront rather than spread out over the rest of his contract. And from what I can tell, the Phillies could probably use a quantity over quality haul from him. Get maybe 4 B level prospects with high floor, guys that have high probability of becoming average MLB players, but maybe not much more. One of those guys might turn into an all-star, but essentially this team needs to fill every single roster spot from ground up. Getting one big star prospect and a bunch of nobodies doesn’t help much given their current position.

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  Timber

A whole lotta this. If the Phillies trade Cole Hamels for a 20-year-old prospect who ends up having Cole Hamels’ exact career trajectory, then that is not a wash, that is a huge win for the Phillies. Considering the huge cost-savings teams get for young players’ team-control years, and the fact that Hamels’ best years are likely behind him, then if the Phillies trade Hamels’ entire contract and get a prospect that turns into a 2-2.5 win player, that will be a good trade for them.

tz
11 years ago

I wonder if the Phils big wigs are talking loudly about the ugliness of their rebuilding project to try to soften Utley into being willing to accept a trade.

You might be able to make a case about holding onto Hamels until the Phils are good again (I disagree, but it’s not crazy). But it should be a no-brainer that Utley, like Rollins, isn’t as likely to be a plus regular when the rebuilding is over. They should try to get as much for him right this moment as they can.

Dan
11 years ago
Reply to  tz

Possible, but Utley strikes me as the one fan favorite they would be better off keeping. Maintaining a fan base is important for team revenue, even those in the midst of rebuilding. And certain players have value simply by being popular and for the number of fans they attract to the team.

It’s the reason I, as a Red Sox fan, would never want to see Pedroia or Ortiz traded, even if it made sense from an on-the-field production standpoint.

DL80
11 years ago
Reply to  Dan

But do specific players really draw fans when the team is terrible? Have Phillies fans been coming out specifically to watch Ryan Howard? Did White Sox fans come out to see Konerko?

I just don’t buy it. I know it sounds reasonable, but when teams are bad for several years, their attendance is bad, and it doesn’t seem to matter whether or not the “face of the franchise” is still there.

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  DL80

It doesn’t help that those star players were also terrible players at the time.

Dan
11 years ago
Reply to  DL80

This makes sense, but Utley is at the age (36) where he wouldn’t get anything very valuable in return, even though he is still, by any measure, more than worth his contract. He put up 3.5 WAR last year while making $15 million, but his age guarantees that he wouldn’t get back a premium prospect in trade. That, combined with the fact that he’s probably the Phillies’ most popular player, means that he’s more valuable to the Phillies than he would be to anyone else.

Bob in Bucks
11 years ago

This is a silly “analysis”. Comparing other team timelines ignores each team’s specific issues. As Phillies have no up and coming “for sure” prospects I am focusing on 2020

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  Bob in Bucks

A couple “for sure” prospects does not a good farm system make. Depth is also extremely important.

As much as we like to think that we can look at a team’s current roster and farm system and predict how good that team will be in three years, the fact is that so many things happen that we can’t predict that after about three years, almost anything is possible.

Bob
11 years ago

Theres completely no money tied up in anyone past 2017. They have no upcoming expensive arbitration cases as well. Thats one of the biggest franchises in baseball with hundreds of million dollars to spend. This stuff about they wont compete till 2020 is non sense. This isnt the Tampa Bay Rays and nor is even the Baltimore Orioles. They can buy wins and sooner than people think because contracts can be backloaded until Ryan Howards contract is off the books. The Phillies will have a protected pick in 2016s draft, there is no reason for them to not go after the abnormally young free agents hitting the market. Justin Upton, Jason Heyward, Rick Porcello. They all make sense.

I don't care what anyone
11 years ago
Reply to  Bob

Waiting for the “Highlight and Google” FELONY FRAUD guy to chime in on this one.

BipMember since 2016
11 years ago

Did anyone ever google that? What was it?

Bob
11 years ago

Its funny because if you see the writer is Marti Woliver lol

Joe Brady
11 years ago
Reply to  Bob

Another thing to consider with trading Hamels. Take his $90M/5 or $110M/5, and spend it on Moncada +++. You have whatever prospects you can for Hamels, whatever prospects you can get with the $90M++ in savings, and whatever draft picks you get from finishing in the top-5 worst records.

You have to go scorched earth. Theo, so far, has seemed to nail it. Trade everyone, get everything you can, and when they are ready, start spending.

Free_AEC
11 years ago
Reply to  Joe Brady

The Phillies have chopped over $43 million from their payroll this year, more than any other team in MLB.

The Phillies just signed one of the very richest TV deals in MLB history, estimated at as much as $6 Billion.

Despite all the obvious wealth the Phillies have bought nothing.

_

Highlight and Google: John Powers Middleton Felony Fraud

_