How Mookie Betts Has Been Baseball’s Best Hitter
It’s not entirely clear anything was wrong with Mookie Betts in 2017. Yes, he finished with a wRC+ of just 108, after the previous season’s 137, but those numbers can occasionally mislead. Consider the Statcast-based expected wOBA, available to query at Baseball Savant. Betts, in 2015, had an expected wOBA of .335. In 2016, it was .336. In 2017, it was .341. I wouldn’t necessarily call that conclusive, but it’s evidence that Betts was just hurt by a little bit of bad luck. He remained a perfectly good hitter all the while.
In 2018, Betts has an expected wOBA of .602. He leads all qualified hitters in wRC+. Tuesday night, in a game started by Shohei Ohtani, Betts went deep three times. Betts won’t keep this up, because no one could keep this up, but it’s worth it to look under the hood. Betts’ scorching start has been a consequence of his hitting to his strengths.
There’s something about Betts that’s always been funny to me. From day one, Betts has been renowned for his discipline, and for his bat control. His bat-to-ball skills are among the best in the league, and few hitters seem to be so good in the area of pitch identification. Rarely can a pitcher make Betts look bad. But for as talented as he is, Betts has always been awful to the opposite field. Over his career, to the pull side, Betts has posted a 242 wRC+. Going the other way, that wRC+ sinks to a lowly 25. There’s a difference, therefore, of 217 points, which is the largest such difference in baseball since Betts was promoted. It clearly hasn’t prevented Betts from being successful, but if Betts is going to hit, he’s going to do his hitting in and around left field.
Let’s look at a couple of spray charts, also from Baseball Savant. On the left, last year’s Betts. On the right, this year’s Betts.
You can see a clear preference to hit to left field. It’s especially clear on the right. To make it easier to understand, we can draw a line up the middle of the field. Often, you’ll see the field split into thirds. I’m just using halves — there are pulled balls, and there are non-pulled balls. Here are Betts’ year-to-year rates of pulled batted balls, going back to 2015.
- 2015: 58%
- 2016: 54%
- 2017: 60%
- 2018: 84%
That rate for this season is the highest in the game. No one has pulled the ball as often as Betts has. Right away, that seems like a good thing, given Betts’ own background, but it would be fair to wonder if Betts is just rolling over on a bunch of balls. I mean, we already know he’s not, since we saw the spray chart, but sometimes guys get pull-heavy and they drill the ball into the ground. Typically, grounders are pulled, and fly balls go the other way. With Betts, this isn’t happening. He’s not just pulling the ball more — he’s also lifting the ball more. That’s not always so easy to do. Here are year-to-year changes in average launch angle, with Betts being the point in yellow.
Betts was already something of an air-ball hitter, but his average launch angle has increased by 10.7 degrees. That’s the game’s third-biggest increase to this point, with Betts behind only Leonys Martin and Francisco Cervelli. To the pull side, Betts’ historical launch angle was right around 10 degrees. Now it’s up at 20. Betts is pulling the ball, and pulling it in the air, which is exactly what he would need to do in order to maximize his skillset.
Two videos can hardly tell you very much, but just so you can see what this might look like, here’s Betts in Angel Stadium in 2017, swinging at a slider over the plate.
And here’s Betts in Angel Stadium on Tuesday, swinging at a slider over the plate.
I don’t know what the mindset was in the 2017 video, and obviously Betts has hit plenty of homers before, but in the second clip, the intention is readily apparent. You see Betts trying to hit the ball hard. He doesn’t cut his own swing off. He looks like a home-run hitter. Maybe he was just feeling it on Tuesday, I don’t know. But Betts is someone who’s slugging .796, while running a contact rate above 90%. In this era, Betts appears to be poised to put his contact skills to great use.
What can you do, as a pitcher? Betts just isn’t going to strike out very much. He never has, and he never will. It’s understood that Betts is pretty weak when he goes to right field, so, here are the pitches that, in 2017, forced Betts to go the other way:
Unsurprisingly, last year’s Betts wasn’t often able to pull outside pitches. Trying to pull outside pitches is exactly how hitters get themselves in ground-ball trouble. So, in theory, as a pitcher, you just try to work Betts away, but this is where his eye comes in handy. In terms of swinging at pitches over the outer third or beyond, Betts is running one of the very lowest swing rates in the league. He knows his zone and he knows his strengths almost perfectly. Every hitter is capable of occasionally being fooled, but, generally speaking, Betts won’t swing at an outside pitch unless he has to. Until there are two strikes, or unless the situation demands a particular approach, Betts seems happy to look for something to drive to left or left-center. I didn’t plan to pad this post with a comparison between Mookie Betts and Jose Bautista, but this approach is reminiscent of that one. J.D. Martinez is proof of the power of being able to hit the ball hard to all fields, but Betts is proof you don’t have to be able to do it. Not if you know every nook and cranny of the zone.
Betts, of course, won’t finish the season with a batting line that makes him out to be the new Barry Bonds. Yet, there are few things more valuable than a pulled batted ball in the air. Mookie Betts is hitting like he knows it. As the opposition is concerned, these are not going to be easy adjustments to make. Betts never makes anything simple.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.



The swing he put on that second slider is just beautiful.
Another Axe Bat guy killing the ball.
As a sox fan anecdotally it felt like Mookie was getting robbed of a double in the LCF gap at least every other night last year. I’d love to see those balls in play maps with hit/out shapes too!
If you told me before the season that Mookie would be putting up Didi Gregorius type numbers at this point, I’d have been bumming. Turns out that’s a huge compliment early in 2018.
His expected wOBA for 2015 was .335, 2016 was .336, and 2017 was .341.
His actual wOBA was .351 for 2015, .379 for 2016, and .339 for 2017.
I’m having a hard time thinking Betts suffered from some bad luck. Regression maybe.
His BABIP dropped from .322 to .268. That is the definition of bad luck. In the modern game it is very difficult to have a 1 to 1 BB/K ratio, hit for power, 72 extra base hits, and only hit .264. The far less meaningful BA is the only stat that even hints that 2017 was anything but a very good season.
There’s more to xwOBA-wOBA than just BABIP. On BABIP, he was unlucky. On wOBA, he was not. The latter is much more important.
Jose bautista had a 1 to 1 k/bb and he regularly hit 260-270
There’s some truth to this, I think. Though it’s not as simple as one might think. For starters, Betts is a right handed pull hitter who plays half his games in Fenway. Add in his elite speed and it would be immensely surprising if he *didn’t* out perform his xwOBA, and by a fair margin. We don’t have statcast data going back to his prime, but Pedroia’s other peripherals tell enough of the story to model what this looks like.
However, Betts *did* develop a very pronounced pop-up tendency last year. This is correctly reflected in his xwOBA, and in his BABIP, but of course we’re trained to mentally regress BABIP closer to .300, which is why the two seem in conflict for 2017.
If he can avoid popping up so much while generally maintaining the rest of his profile, I wouldn’t at all be surprised to see Betts appreciably out perform his xwOBA again and perhaps put up a season close to his 2016, though I am somewhat skeptical about the power numbers. It will be quite interesting to see!
Pitchers adjusted to Betts zone preferences in ’17, and now Betts has adjusted back. One factor, with two strikes you see him deliberately fouling pitches on the outer edge and beyond, never trying to put it in play. He looks like a guy playing pepper, and he is good at pepper.
I’m not sure that the Fenway effect makes that much difference in the case of Betts, 2017. Looking solely at the splits in slash-line for 2017 (and I realise that this is at best a first approximation, but it might lead to other lines of enquiry):
1) The main home/away difference is that he got on base more often at home, but hit for more power away. One would perhaps have expected the opposite.
2) His power stroke fell off a cliff during July and August (down 100 points, close to his OBP).
3) With RISP, he slashed .355/.457/.551 — without, .225/.301/.396. For comparison, the numbers in 2016 are .355/.406/.638 and .313/.353/.507, which obviously is a much smaller gap. (And seems more typical for a top-level batter.)
Again, I accept that these are not the greatest stats to work off. But it might just be that he went into a slump for a third of the season (and came back out in September). Or maybe he was pressing too hard to compensate for the uncharacteristic 2017 Red Sox offense.
To be fair, opposite field power like JD Martinez isn’t super-common and Fenway’s weird right field makes it not a great place to drive balls out the opposite way.
Also, Betts is a monster. He’s a reminder that (a) if you have elite bat-to-ball skills, you can max out everything else and (b) we seriously underrate short guys until they prove us wrong over and over and over again.
Also always worth keeping in mind: Betts is younger than Judge
Also worth keeping in mind: Bets would be at 2B if the Sox didn’t have Pedroia entrenched there.
Just looked, Betts career wRC+ (in less games/PA of course), higher than Jose Altuve.
There are a few readily apparent differences in the two swings, so I wonder if he’s made some swing adjustments (perhaps influenced by JD Martinez). In the ground ball swing, he clearly rotates his shoulders away from the ball and has his hands quite high — you can see them appear behind his helmet. He then takes a downward trajectory to the ball. In the HR swing, he rotates his shoulders much less and carries his hands much lower, which allows for the on-plane swing.
Once we have a little more data, I’d be especially curious to see if his launch angles have gone up this year over recent history.
The question is whether he will pay the babip price. Pull/flyball hitters tend to have a lowish babip.
This is shown by the two most famous players with an extreme pull and elevate approach (bautista career 264, brian dozier 276) but it also shows in the league (I filtered for >45% pull rate and <40% GB and babip was under 280).
Obviously this didn't hurt bautista but maybe his 2017 babip wasn't all that fluke-ish.
In 2015 and 16 his babip was over 300 but he also had an average pull rate then. In 2017 he increased the pull rate and babip dropped.
Maybe he is actually more a dozier type hitter who has a very good k-bb% but is more of a 270 hitter with low to mid 30s homers instead of a batting title candidate.
This is no knock on him, bautista and dozier were great hitters (after they found their approach) but for fantasy owners that could be relevant.
Btw I do own him in my league and had him on the bench his 3 HR game because I thought he was still hurt:).
You mean that you had him on your bench for the third 3 HR game of his career.
Is there any evidence that the increased prevalence of shifts affects those with high pull or opposite field rates? I would think that a Rod Carew (or JD Martinez) type that uses the whole field would be far less vulnerable to shifts and those with more predictable spray charts would have lower BABIPs. Is there evidence to bear this out?
How do we find out who some of the other guys are on the chart of biggest increases in launch angle?
He robbed JD Martinez of his power, clearly
Jed Lowrie has been a way better hitter but sure, keep pushing Boston and NY players who are already established stars, smh
Mookie leads Lowrie by 50 points per wRC+ and by 83 points in wOBA. Mookie also has a better BB%, K%, ISO, BA, OBP, SLG and more runs scored. The only stats where Lowrie leads Mookie are HR and RBI. If you feel those stats don’t accurately reflect Lowrie’s actual dominance, make your case. Otherwise you are just tilting at windmills.
Don’t feed the troll, just ignore him.
Lowrie is like my Fiat from forty years back. Fun to drive but impossible to keep on the road.
Btw this sounds like blasphemy considering how good he is but I’m not a huge fan of betts swing. Quick hips and hands and compact swing but also kinda choppy and hooky. It is kind of an old school swing that gets below the ball late and thus needs out front contact for elevation and power.
JDM in contrast has this “new swing” it is slightly longer but gets the bathead down quickly so that it is on plane to all fields.