I Would Like to Misappropriate the Blue Jays’ Spring Training Scoreboard for Use in Shenanigans

On Tuesday morning, legendary baseball writer Jayson Stark was at Blue Jays camp in Dunedin, Florida, where he found something he liked.
Here's another Dunedin feature I'm a fan of. Exit velocity data on the scoreboard during batting practice. Including the bunts!
— Jayson Stark (@jaysonst.bsky.social) 2025-02-25T15:36:16.065Z
The Blue Jays were posting live batted ball data during batting practice, and this is indeed cool. At the absolute worst, this is an interesting bit of information for anyone who happens to be hanging around. We all have varying appetites for data while consuming sports, but I don’t know anyone who sees a hitter put a ball in the seats and doesn’t immediately think, “I wonder exactly how far he hit that.”
I’m sure the players and coaches have access to this information at their convenience, should they want it. But sharing it on the scoreboard in real time offers a unique opportunity: To use this advanced technology to do shenanigans.
My first inclination upon having that thought was, “Well, I guess that’s one more thing I don’t have in common with professional athletes,” but, wait, ballplayers love doing bits. Some professional athletes are always on the move, always hopping from activity to activity, but most of the life of a baseball player is spent doing hurry-up-and-wait. I don’t know if you’ve ever spent time around a group of young men with time on their hands, but truly the spark of human genius resides within any group of bored dudes.
Last year I was killing time in the press box before a game at Citizens Bank Park when the Phillies emerged onto the field en masse. They set up a marker in center field, then one by one they took turns chipping golf balls at it. Closest to the pin, I learned later, got the first pick in the team’s fantasy football draft.
Every baseball team is like this, to a greater or lesser extent. That’s how we got the hot foot, the rally cap, and some truly innovative physical comedy routines from the world of college baseball.
Obviously, it’s occurred to these guys that you could gamify the Statcast output at batting practice. Practically, that’d mean shooting for the highest exit velocity, but that’s boring. Not only would the same guy win every day, trying to hit the ball as hard as possible is just… work.
But what if you were looking for specific targets? Like, seeing who could get closest to a completely flat launch angle.
Only it turns out that’s not very much fun. Over the course of the Statcast era, there have been more than 16,000 batted balls with a launch angle of 0 degrees. You’d think that’d mean a line drive, but in practice these are ground balls. The hardest-hit example came off the bat of… would anyone like to guess?
Oh, you all said Giancarlo Stanton. That was anticlimactic. So was that flat 122.2-mph screamer, it turns out. Here, take a look at the most boring double play you’ll ever see.
OK, then. What lies at the other end of the spectrum? After all, the original post not only marveled at the utility of having live batted ball data on the scoreboard, it was tinged with a soupçon of “ha ha, isn’t it silly that bunts have an exit velocity and launch angle?” (Which, to be clear, it is.)
So let’s have it. What’s the softest you can hit a ball? Even in a batting practice environment, there’s a lot of transfer of momentum involved in hitting a ball into fair territory. Force equals mass times acceleration, coefficient of restitution, things of that nature. I don’t know, I’m not a physicist. In order to perfectly deaden a pitch that’s thrown even at 80 mph, you’d have to be Tony Gwynn multiplied by The Flash.
But you can get close. Counting spring training and the playoffs, the softest batted ball in the Statcast era came off the bat at 5.2 mph. There are two instances of a ball hitting this mark. One is, to be frank, a data error. First, Lucas Duda was the hitter. I was about to say that he’s never bunted in his life, but Baseball Savant does have him down for three bunts in his big league career, including a successful sacrifice.
But also, early in the Statcast days, the system had problems reading balls that came off the bat at extremely high or low launch angles, and that’s very obviously what happened here.
It’s showing a quadruple failure. That can’t happen; it’s got to be instrumentation.
Not so for the actual softest contact of the past decade. I give you Christian Bethancourt, who on May 14, 2022 laid down a sacrifice bunt that came off the bat at 5.2 mph and -17 degrees and traveled two feet in the air.
Talk about soft hands. This guy shouldn’t be playing baseball, he should be baking wedding cakes or sculpting statues.
The hardest thing to do in sports is to hit a round ball with a round bat, and so on. But to do it at 5 mph simply beggars belief. Stanton’s white-hot double play ball came off the bat nearly 25 times as fast. Stanton’s grounder would’ve outrun most World War I fighter planes. Bethancourt’s? Barely faster than walking pace. Bethancourt’s bunt would run the mile in 11 and a half minutes.
Bunts under 10 mph aren’t unheard of; there were four in the majors last year, which is more than I would’ve guessed. But how softly can you hit a ball when you’re trying to hit it hard?
The softest non-bunt ball in play in the Statcast era came off the bat of Willi Castro (albeit only barely) in 2019: 7.6 mph. But that was on a checked swing; Castro didn’t follow through, which as you know is essential to any legitimate swing.
In fact… did this pitch bounce before Castro hit it? That seems to be the case. Sachin Tendulkar (he’s one of three cricket players I can name, don’t be pedantic in the comments) would’ve been proud.
Still, we want a full swing on a pitch that is still in the air.
Ty France followed through here, and it got him only an extra tenth of a mile an hour of exit velo. Basically all of the softest hit groundballs look like this: Chasing at a breaking ball in the dirt and ticking it off the end of the bat and straight into the ground. It’s the least amount of contact a hitter can make with a baseball, so it makes sense that these batted balls would have the lowest exit velocity.
| Hitter | Pitcher | Year | EV (MPH) | Pitch Type | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willi Castro | Mike Clevinger | 2019 | 7.6 | Curveball | Low, Checked Swing |
| Ty France | Junior Guerra | 2020 | 7.7 | Curveball | Low |
| Harrison Bader | Aaron Wilkerson | 2017 | 8.0 | Slider | Strike |
| C.J. Cron | Reyes Moronta | 2022 | 8.6 | Slider | Low |
| Jesús Sánchez | Michael McGreevy | 2024* | 8.9 | Slider | Low |
| Eduardo Escobar | Max Fried | 2022 | 9.1 | Changeup | Outside |
| Otto Lopez | Kyle Finnegan | 2024 | 9.3 | Slider | Low |
| Mike Yastrzemski | José Suarez | 2020 | 9.4 | Curveball | Low, Checked Swing |
| Adley Rutschman | Ian Hamilton | 2023 | 9.8 | Sinker | Low, Checked Swing |
| Jose Iglesias | Spencer Schwellenbach | 2024 | 9.8 | 4-Seam Fastball | Low |
You know what else these batted balls have in common? They all resulted in outs. Iglesias actually ran into his own weak grounder in fair territory and got called out.
The softest grounder that resulted in the batter reaching came in 2021, off the bat of Adam Eaton at 13.7 mph. It was a perfect deadened swinging bunt in front of Salvador Perez, who got out of his crouch like a reluctant grandpa who’s been summoned from his recliner.
I am not 100% sure that Eaton beat this throw, but the call on the field stands, I guess. Still, the result is different but the path there is the same: another pitch with downward break that glanced off the end of the bat.
One last question, having dispensed with the initial premise of using the Blue Jays’ fancy new toy for silliness. How softly can you hit a ball in the air?
In previous searches, I’d set the filter for exit velocity at 20 mph. Baseball Savant has one batted ball since 2015 with a type of fly ball, line drive, or popup and an exit velo that low. I’m inclined to discard it for a few reasons: First, it came in spring training, with a truly puzzling combination of data: 14.3 mph EV, -77 degree launch angle, but a line drive single. Also, it came off the bat of someone named Wagner Lagrange, who is definitely a ballplayer I’d heard of before and not Ben Foster’s gunslinger from 3:10 to Yuma.
Finally, there’s no visual evidence. The video that comes up in the search is six seconds of a picture-in-picture interview with Dylan Carlson. Poppycock, says I.
The next contender was a 2017 single by Jason Castro off Josh Tomlin at 23.9 mph. Also a data glitch, I think. Not only was this still Statcast’s teething period, there is a video for this play, and it shows Castro lining the ball off the right-center field wall.
The winner, then, takes us back to the original setting: A Blue Jays spring training game in Dunedin. Toronto lefty Brendon Little comes in to face Akil Baddoo with two on and one out in the top of the eighth — these games don’t count, but it’s good to practice winning habits in high-pressure situations.
Little’s first pitch is a wicked sinker in on Baddoo’s hands, and it absolutely saws him off. You can hear the delightful crack of Baddoo’s bat handle exploding — it sounds like a straw broom smacking against a concrete sidewalk — as the ball blorps toward the second baseman at 26.9 mph.
Given the absurdly low exit velocity, Little is tasked with making the play himself, and he doesn’t. It’s a tough play; the lefty is falling off the mound toward third base, and Baddoo is booking it down the line. Rather than fielding the ball cleanly, Little trips and goes to his knees in the general vicinity of the ball. (He looks like Matt Martell trying to catch a punt.) Honestly, Little does well to even make it close from that position.
Yeah, I told you it was going to be ugly pic.twitter.com/A8KucSqa6x
— ByMattMartell (@ByMattMartell) April 22, 2017
But the result is the softest-hit ball in the air ever tracked by Statcast in a major league game. So that’s the benchmark: 5.2 mph for a bunt, 7.6 mph for a full swing, 26.9 mph for a ball in the air. Everyone ante up $20, and whoever beats those benchmarks in batting practice takes home the pot. What do you say?
Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.
This was delightful, thanks!
Very nice. Would like for the softest over-the-fence home run to be included.
Probably a blooper down the RF line in Yankee stadium or Fenway.
The shortest was hit by Lorenzo Cain on 29/07/17 in Fenway. Wrapped around Pesky’s Pole at 302′. 90.4 mph exit velo, which may well be the softest!
I found a Harold Ramirez home run that was hit 85.4mph down the left field line at the Trop (do not rest in piece). That’s the slowest according to some randos on the internet.
I’m honestly amazed at the achievement of turning a 96mph fastball into a 5.2mph bunt and would like so many camera angles and slo-mos on that specific swing.
Dang, Matt out here catching strays.
I feel like it’s much worse for Brandon Little to be compared to me than for me to be compared to him!
Or not catching them, as the case may be.
I am really intrigued by who the other cricketers Michael could name are. Don Bradman (Babe Ruth-esque statistical freak)? MS Dhoni or Virat Kholi (I am trying to think of what current or relatively cricketers would have enough cultural cache to be known – I assume because of the IPL, and the popularity of Indian cricketers that they might be names people recognise?)
Maybe Imran Khan, cricketers in the ’80s, ex-president of Pakistan?
I asked him exactly this on Bluesky. You will be surprised who the other two are:
Not surprised by Australian Shane Warne. Regarded as the greatest “spin” or “slow” bowler of all time (Think cricket equivalent of Knuckleball) who bowled the famous “ball of the century” in cricket.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnyQFWJTvQI
And Freddie Flintoff was a charismatic swashbuckling English captain who was a lot of fun
I did think Shane Warne – I had forgotten he had dated Liz Hurley, so he had some non-cricket reasons to know him. And Freddie Flintoff hosts Top Gear now, so that is not a surprise now you’ve said. I was wondering though, as a Brit, which cricketers had made some impression – I don’t know how much cultural impact British things have in the US – it made me really happy a few weeks ago when Meg mentioned Wallace and Gromit on Effectively Wild.
I hear you Phil. Im an Aussie who is “shocked” by the lack of American interest in the great game of cricket! I would of thought the T20 game would at least create some interest but I have come to realise a few things about our American friends so Im not going to take their inventory or do a thesis here 🙂
Taking the view of cricketers that transcend cricket then Flintoff and Warne and to a lesser extent Tendulkar make sense as Michael’s choices.
Although the fact that he didnt know Bradman makes me a bit sad. Bradman’s average was nearly 70% better than the second best player in history. Imagine a baseball player hitting .540 for his entire 15 year career! And imagine that player still hitting that amount even though he lost his 6 best years to the second world war!
Cricket will be a sport at the 2028 Olympics in Los Angels. That may increase interest some.
There is a professional US league, but to be honest, I’ve seen quite a bit more Curling or Archery on US TV than cricket, and vastly more cornhole (I played cornhole some as a child, and was totally unaware that it was considered a sport or even what the real name was until a few years ago, who knew?).
This is where I get to tell my story about how back in 2009, when I worked for the Dunedin Blue Jays and they had their old scoreboard, I watched Stanton take BP (he was with Jupiter), and he spent the entire time trying to go opposite field. Lot of inside out.
Then in the game, he struck out in his first AB, then made up for it in the next AB by absolutely launching one over said scoreboard in the thick Florida night air. And it looked like he barely got it, too. Amazingly fun to watch. Seeing what that scoreboard is like now is like seeing a spaceship compared to what it once was.
Great work, Michael. Loved it.
Blorps.
Makes my day.