In a Burning World, They Keep Playing Baseball
The smoke is everywhere. It is in everything. It is inescapable. Closing the windows can’t keep it out completely. No air purifier will absorb all of the particles of ash. It has been days now since I stepped outside without feeling it immediately: the heaviness, the scratching in my throat and my lungs and my eyes. And I’m one of the lucky ones. I’m healthy, and I’m indoors, and though the air here is full of the aftermath of fires, those fires are far away to the south, where the wind is blowing in from. There, the fires are still burning. They burn more by the hour. Thousands of people have been displaced, forced to take refuge in fairgrounds left empty by the pandemic, the fates of their homes and their livelihoods unknown. Thousands more still have to work in this state of uncertainty, with the air around them full of danger. Dozens are missing; dozens have been killed. The skies have gone deep red, then disappeared entirely. And this, we are told, is what we have to look forward to in the summers of the future: More burning. More toxic air. More displacement. More death.
Through it all, they keep playing baseball.
***

The image looks like it’s been doctored, like someone has run a bad filter over it. Everything has a blurry red-gray haze: the players, the cardboard fans, the grass. More than 790,000 acres of land in the state of Washington has been consumed by fire. In Seattle, though, the Mariners are, unexpectedly, in the midst of a playoff push. They are scheduled to play a double-header. The amount of fine particulate matter in the air measures over 200 micrograms per cubic meter. The roof being closed doesn’t help.
Almost a month ago, when the fires started burning, MLB clarified their position on the cancellation of games due to air quality. There is precedent for such a thing happening. Northwestern minor league teams have done it in recent years; so have teams in the Australian Baseball League. But as far as major league teams go, MLB has decided on a hands-off approach, leaving the decision of whether or not to play with team ownership. There has been much discussion of air-quality-related postponement over the past month; there has yet to be an actual postponement. Not when the skies above Oracle Park were thick with an eerie orange haze, not when ash blanketed the cars parked outside the Oakland Coliseum. And not in Seattle, where the Air Quality Index stayed firmly in the Unhealthy range throughout Monday. In Vancouver, Canada Post canceled all deliveries. It was unsafe, they said, to make postal workers walk around in this environment.
It looks, in the video of T-Mobile Park on my screen, much like it does outside my window. Light disperses in weird ways, obscuring faces both alive and not; the outlines of nearby buildings rendered almost invisible. And sheltered in my room, all the windows closed and the purifier blasting on its highest setting, I watch as the Mariners and the A’s, who have now played in unfavorable air quality conditions in multiple states, take the field. Some draw fabric covers over their faces: protection from spreading the coronavirus, but not from the inhalation of smoke. Others, like Ramón Laureano, wear N-95 masks as they stand out there, waiting as usual for the pitch, the sound of contact — the deep breath and the exhale.
And though baseball can be a very effective means of escaping the circumstances of the world outside the stadium — even this season, when the reminders of the pandemic are everywhere — it is impossible to find yourself escaping when the problem currently menacing the outside world is visible in the air itself, the air through which the players move, the air through which the baseball is to fly. It looks so dense that you can almost smell it.
Still, they keep playing baseball. No one, after all, is telling them to stop.
***
In the first game, the Mariners, somehow, manage to stage a comeback, down 5-1 after four innings of a truncated seven-inning game. In the fifth, it’s two home runs: one from José Marmolejos, one from Kyle Lewis, breaking an 0-for-13. And in the sixth, a single from Phillip Ervin and a two-out double from Tim Lopes tie the game at 5. The final out of the sixth proves elusive. Joakim Soria walks Dylan Moore, walks Ty France after him. To the plate comes Lewis. And with a flourish, he takes four consecutive balls. Marco Gonzales, the Mariners’ put-upon starter, screams from the dugout. They hold on in the top of the seventh, and the Mariners win, the strange, heavy lights shining down on them.
After the game, it seems like the second game of the double-header is in jeopardy. Jesús Luzardo, the A’s starter for the first game, talks about gasping for breath. So does Laureano. But a few hours after the first game ended, they reappear on the field, the air now looking even worse. And in the very first inning, something incredible happens.
Jimmy Yacabonis is on the mound for the Mariners, and from the very first batter he faces — Tommy La Stella, who gets hit by a pitch — it’s clear that this is going to be a struggle. It isn’t long before a run scores, before the bases are loaded with two out, and Laureano hammers a pitch to center. It’s a home run, heading over the wall, but Lewis runs after it, full-throttle, leaps into the air with his glove arm extended, and somehow — somehow — it lands in the glove, and he lands on his feet, his body unable to contain his joy as he bounds over the outfield grass.
It’s a beautiful play. It draws instant comparisons to Ken Griffey Jr. And when we watch it again, when we return to it in highlight reels years in the future, it will always be partially obscured by the haze: pure elation, leaping and shouting and breathing in an atmosphere of visible poison.
***
Yesterday’s Giants-Mariners game was postponed. The smoke was too thick, the playing conditions too hazardous. MLB, it seems, is now considering the creation of league-wide thresholds for air quality. The ballparks of the west are all open-air; the increasing heat and dryness, the decades of fire mismanagement, all suggest that there will certainly be more giant smoke clouds in our future. It is now a question of how often such wildfire disasters will happen, and of how we will choose to deal with them — what level of risk is considered tolerable. There is no amount of smoke inhalation that has no effect on the body when sustained over a long period. It is always dangerous. But for most people, it is business as usual, headaches and burning eyes be damned. There is simply no other option other than to work, even if the very air itself is unsafe.
And baseball, for now, is no different. The entertainment provided by a professional sport is deemed essential enough to play through such aberrant conditions, if not for the people whom it entertains, then for the people whose profits depend upon it; only outcry from the players and the public can put a halt to the proceedings. It is still unnerving to see these baseball games played in noxious clouds. And maybe, someday in the future, it won’t be. Maybe we will get used to this. I hope we don’t. I really, really hope we don’t.
RJ is the dilettante-in-residence at FanGraphs. Previous work can be found at Baseball Prospectus, VICE Sports, and The Hardball Times.
Heavy. Eloquently written.
I’m grateful for this.
Seems like it should be mentioned that we have this and more of this to look forward to because of our failure to adequately address climate change. I feel like leaving that out may have been a conscious decision to placate the trolls that complain about “politics” when the facts make certain political groups look like idiotic goons.
There is zero evidence the wildfires have anything to do with climate change. Droughts, wildfires and many other natural phenomena have been occurring long before humans started burning fossil fuels. Climate change is natural and changes can and have been drastic, once again long before humans started using fossil fuels. We are still recovering from the last ice age. The earth is far more colder today than it had been for most of the last 200 million years. Polar ice is not “normal” and there is nothing “standard” about the current climate or the climate of the last 12,000 years. If there is a default climate, it is at least 5 to 10 degrees warmer on average than it is currently. For the 165 million years dinosaurs dominated the landscape, Canada was tropical and Antarctica looked more like New Zealand and supported dinosaurs even though there were long periods of darkness.
In California, long before Europeans arrived the indigenous people would start low intensity wildfires because plains/grasslands were more conducive to their lifestyle. This was common across the world and throughout time. One of the most extreme examples is that the aborigines of Australia essentially burned the continent drastically altering the biome of the entire continent. Either way, parts of California have far more trees/wildfire fuel today than they did a few hundred years ago.
Back in the 90’s politicians and environmentalists gutted the forestry industry in California. Once upon a time brush was routinely cleared and trees were trimmed with the refuse burned in biomass plants across the state. Now, much of that brush and wildfire fuel is left in the wild creating far more intense wildfires. There is far more fuel left in the wild to burn.
My source is NASA. What’s yours? Infowars?
“There is zero evidence the wildfires have anything to do with climate change.”
Annnnnnnnd the rest is all climate change denying garbage.
Have to say, you probably picked the incorrect audience for this, knowing the Fangraphs readership. I would be more on board with the argument that many are jumping and pointing at solely climate change when the truth is that this is a disastrous collision of climate change, unchecked development and demands on natural resources, and cruddy policies. What can I say, we like our simple answers.
Also, citing that the Earth had a totally different environment at various points in our history, while true, overlooks the amount of agony that will be inflicted on our species if the planet suddenly reverts to that environment. “The climate changes all the time” is a bit of a “let them eat cake” argument – it breezes past the cost of those changes on the assumption that the speaker isn’t the one who’s going to have to bear them.
I think you have this backwards. Climate change is not the simple answer. It is the hard answer. “Rake the leaves” is the easy answer as it avoids the hard answer and also lets you blame your opponents.* Raking the leaves doesn’t change anyone’s way of life; addressing climate change surely will.
* weird how it’s California’s fault even though most of the land is federally owned.
Yes, “raking the leaves” is also a simple answer, and certainly a simpler answer than climate change. But the point is that there are contributory factors that are very much in human control.
Also, I find the “the land is federally owned” argument to be highly problematic when forestry projects in said federally owned lands are consistently torpedoed by lawsuits. I am seeing this first hand in my community right now! They want to do forest management to mitigate the fires, but members of the community argue that the forest management proposals are logging projects in disguise that are going to destroy habitats and natural beauty.
Well, the US government should surely be able to defend lawsuits. I believe they have resources for that. They can also change the laws. As for trusting the intent of this administration, it’s extra reasonable to not.
Come on, the rejection of forest management policies began well prior to this administration, and you know as well as I that it’s not just about *being able* to defend against lawsuits – our legal system is easily weaponized to effectively prevent something from happening, potentially for a decade or more, even without an actual judgement being issued, and that’s before even taking into account that you just need the ear of one sympathetic 9th Circuit judge to get a judgement in your favor.
California has not been doing controlled burns of the land for the last century. They’re only burning 20k acres and they need to burn more like 1M acres/year. (4M have burned this year; historically 4-11M acres burned annually before humans engaged in controlled burns.) Part of this is the US Forestry’s Service recommendation a century ago not to do controlled burns, which reversed what Native Americans had been doing in the West for centuries. (California also has strange water management policies where they run out of fresh water in farm areas in dry seasons and then insist on having rivers flush out to the Pacific Ocean instead of damming them, because it helps the salmon or something.)
Temperatures have definitely risen 1.5C over the last 150 years, but as Anthony Princeton says, that was off a mini-Ice Age. It has provided dry tinder for this year’s burn.
How would you propose to solve Climate Change? What are the costs? How long will it take before the West never experiences 4M+ acres burning again? Do you believe Biden/Obama that they can change the weather? (“this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal”). Do you believe AOC that 2030 makes Climate Change irreversible? How much carbon do we need to remove by 2030?
“How would you propose to solve Climate Change?”
How do people propose to resolve anything these days? Massive state regimes that are both unlikely to succeed at any of their stated purposes while also (in some cases, by design) undermining classically liberal notions about our relationship with government.
Incorrect. The majority currently in power believe that any and all problems can be solved by tax cuts for the wealthy and prayer in school. I’ll take the side that believes in science and yes perhaps government intrusion to prevent the world from becoming one giant lake of acid. It beats open authoritarianism for the sake of profits for the in group at the expense of the out group.
“Believes in science”. Doesn’t actually read the science and certainly can’t explain the costs and benefits of policy options to anyone else, but he believes in it and will call you names if you don’t immediately agree. Good to know.
Rachael McDaniel is proving a very fitting successor to Sheryl Ring. All the same Leftist pieties.
Haha I am not going to rush to the defense of our current administration, except to say that they don’t think there are any real problems other than political problems in the first place. And the party establishment has long been in a “let’s get ours and after me the flood” mindset.
If we are going to get out of this mess it’s going to be because we find a happy nexus between quality of life, technological improvements and political freedoms. The drastic top down proposals being put out there are doomed from the start – they both overestimate the competency of centralized control and the willingness of the people to consent to it.
“Droughts, wildfires and many other natural phenomena have been occurring long before humans started burning fossil fuels. Climate change is natural and changes can and have been drastic, once again long before humans started using fossil fuels.”
This is like getting five feet of snow in August, and saying “this is natural, it snows in January all the time…nothing to see here.”
Hobos start the fires not cilmate change, you idiot
address the homeless issue
Alas Rachael you could have saved so many words!!
Forest fires? Hobos.
Illiteracy? Also hobos.
Obesity? Early-onset diabetes? Gang warfare? Pandemics? You guessed it.
WHY WON’T ANYONE ADDRESS THE *REAL* ISSUES. CERTAINLY MAKES YOU THINK….
WHO IS COZYING UP TO BIG HOBO
How many reasons can there be to NOT allow our simple American game to keep going? The virus, which all by itself includes a national disruption of businesses and schools above and beyond the deaths, the fires, the national tensions surrounding race, and all of this multiplied by a country fighting a hopeless trench war of presidential politics, and spun by a national news media that actually seems invested in confusing us and pushing peoples buttons. Wait a minute. THANK GOD they’re playing baseball.
Excellent once again Rachael, particularly that last paragraph. Which, wow….
thanks, Rachel for this great article. Sitting in smoke bound Seattle I decided today was the day to join and support FanGraphs
The now weekly dreary article about how baseball shouldn’t be played, and even though it is being played, is bereft of any enjoyment. This is not to overlook that people are suffering right now – I live a thousand miles away from these wildfires and our air quality is rated unhealthy, and we just had a large fire of our own that I could see from my front door. And we’ve got the pandemic and another hurricane on top of that. I get it, and I actually am worried for the author on a personal level given the consistent tenor of these articles, because these articles smack of despair. But this is the world right now, we’re doing our best, baseball is doing its best (and actually doing it quite well, despite predictions that players would be dying left and right). Where you might see the band playing as the Titanic sinks I see an expression of resilience. Tomorrow might get worse (in fact, given the trajectory of our politics, it probably will), but today’s challenges are what they are and we, like baseball, meet them as best we can and enjoy what we are lucky to still be able to enjoy.
You must have read a different article than I did.
Honestly asking – in what sense? I went back and re-read it several times and am having trouble finding alternate readings, particularly in the context of previous articles of the same tenor.
This is a new situation that impacts the ability to play baseball beyond anything discussed previously. Why should this not be discussed? Putting one’s head in the sand doesn’t make reality go away. If this is not a topic of interest, it’s very simple to avoid clicking on it. Clearly it is of interests to the authors of this and other sites.
Holy shirt balls the closed captions on this are outstandingly hilarious.
“Wow he made a baby with this stellar stellar effort.” Priceless.
Thank you for this, Rachel. Most comments have already pointed it out, and I’m sure you‘re fully aware – but you’re writing is incredibly powerful and it never fails to resonate with me. I truly appreciate the work you do.
If anything, this brings me back to the “keep politics out of sports” crowd. The people who deny, deny, deflect. Everything presented to them is “fake.” Our skies are literally a red hue, we can tangibly see the poor air quality on our televisions, We live in an overly policed nation that is built on and grounded in systemic racism. Hundreds of thousands are needlessly dead from a pandemic that’s been responded to with gross negligence. We’re literally sending teachers to their deaths. Cats and dogs could fall from the sky and people would deny it.
Yet we just keep trudging into the darkness. People commodify pro athletes and insist they just shut up and play – as if they have some sense of ownership over them with this false pretense that “we sign your paychecks.” Protests for unity are booed in football stadiums. We expect baseball players to drudge on in a climate where they can’t even see where they’re going. Owners, commissioners, others in the Top 1% percentile of our late-stage capitalist society exploit their workers to the furthest extent they can without instant backlash. And even then, they’ll take a week-long PR beating in the name of the almighty dollar.
I know this piece was specifically about the egregiousness of this game being played with this air quality. But, it all just brings me back to the bigger picture. This nation defies climate change, it defies science, it defies logic. We defy the long-term health of ourselves and our planet for the sake of not jeopardizing the income of our richest people. It all just makes me sad. The exploitation, the greed, the lack of foresight of planning. MLB has truly been such a microcosm of all the things wrong in America this year alone. The whole thing just makes me sad.
Apologies for the soapbox. I think I just needed somewhere to vent.
I am going to catch flak for this, but do you realize that your discourse is as packed with unexamined priors as that of the people you regard as science and logic defying? The above is a criticism of irrational thinking that itself reads like a statement of faith!
What?
Thank you for a voice of reason amidst all this hypocrisy 🙂👍⚾️
Man.
I’m probably going to take it on the chin with this post. No worries though, as absolutely none of my self worth is tied into internet up/down votes.
😉
From the title to the closing statement this is – by far – the absolute most melodramatic writing I’ve read anywhere in 2020.
These are adults. They chose to play. Why does that have to be some big “issue”? Seems to me this diatribe is just an extension of, “oh no. awful people who own things doing awful owning things stuff.”
Which I’m really sick of. Can’t lie about that.
Look, I’m not insensitive to the tragedy to life, the environment, & property that is occurring out west.
At all.
But…how would not playing baseball alleviate that? These two things are completely unrelated, man.
You’re not insensitive to it except to when it comes to matters that directly impact the ability of players to play well? The air is hazardous and they shouldn’t play in these very specific circumstances.
I’m a little confused about what you’re saying I’m saying lol.
I’ll try and muddle forward nonetheless.
😉
Man, I – too – wish everything was peachy keen, honky dory, nothing but perfect all the time.
However.
That’s not really how Real Life Stuff works, bro.
How many actual perfect days do you think baseball seasons are comprised of? Easier to pull muscles in the cold. Heat leads to dehydration and cramping. How about UV warnings? Air quality can be poor from other things than just smoke.
Uh?
If we’re holding out for hazard free conditions teams will play maybe a dozen games a year.
Why are you resorting to hyperbole? This isn’t about other situations. This isn’t about playing in perfect weather. This is about the fact that the weather right now is such that it is hazardous to play under.
What exactly is so complicated about understanding that the broad swath you’re talking about has nothing to do with this specific instance?
Why are you unwilling to run your premises out in it’s entirety? My “broad swath” is merely citing similar circumstances.
Pretty simple stuff, man.
Ya know?
🙂
Why is *this* poor air different than *other* poor air quality? Or UV rays, and other “hazardous” conditions?
Because you say so?
Meh. I’m not purchasing that, bro.
For some reason I can’t help but think that the people who feel a need to proclaim that they don’t care about up/down votes are the ones that really do. It’s like if you tell me you’re just looking but are definitely not going to buy a vacuum cleaner. I’m already planning what to do with my sales commission.
@tkdc
You certainly could be correct. Kind of a,” thou doth protest too much” thing.
Right?
There definitely was a point when outside validation did matter to me. (side note: I’m a single parent. I’m watching my son work through this right now)
I’ve just reached a different point in my life. Now days I say things like, “well if next year is 80% as good as this one it’ll be another great year”. I’ve hit a point of being content & secure with myself.
Again, wasn’t always like that.
🙂
Climate change is going to be impossible to fight as long as nations compete with each other.
Let’s say the USA and Canada both become totally carbon-neutral tomorrow (presumably at great expense)… Why wouldn’t China, India, Pakistan, and 200 other nations take advantage by buying all of the suddenly cheaper oil and coal?
One reason many people instinctively resist attempts at climate change is they believe (probably for good reason) that the only way to actually change is for a unified, global governance system to take control over all nations.
Many Americans (myself included) favor local governance as much as is practical, and only favor central governance for issues beyond local control.
I do not trust most countries to make decisions based on benefits to other countries. China will make decisions based on what is best for China. If the USA becomes carbon neutral, why wouldn’t China take advantage? They could use their cheaper fossil fuels to undercut us even more than they already do. China is the world’s worst polluter. Don’t trust them to have the world’s best long term interests at heart.
My POV is that even if the US and Canada became carbon neutral, it would not put even a small dent in the climate change problem. All it would do is kill our economy and embolden China to take advantage.
I hope I am wrong. But I do not think the US is in a position to do literally anything to fight climate change.
I hope you are wrong too, but agree it’s a big hairy beast of a problem. People often point to the (eventual) global agreement to curtail CFC’s during the 1970s-90s which slowed the erosion of the ozone layer as a sign that humans can come together for the greater good.
I’m skeptical though, because CFCs are much less fundamental to economic activity than fossil fuels. And like MLB and AQI-related game protocols, I think the world will only come together for meaningful action after the fact.
That first paragraph had me feeling some kinda way.
Great article.
This is the best article I’ve ever read on fangraphs.
As usual, Rachael, you’ve combined passionate & poetic prose, the Hard Truth, & baseball.
Kudos, Rachael. Big time kudos on this one.
Just another example of why we need a New Normal. When I saw video of this game I was literally terrified. Literally. Terrified. The players were subjected to such a dangerous situation!
Once again, this is entirely on owners just trying to fatten their wallets. Again, they’ve shown they value profits over lives, man.
So gross.
And don’t even get me started on how the federal government totally blew this too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ugh….
Get that face phone, Kyle Lewis!
Almost makes one long for the confines of one of the worst places I ever watched a baseball game, the King Dome.
Well written Rachael