MLB Announces Altered 2020 Postseason Format
If you like last-second changes to the postseason structure, this has been the year for you. Hours before the season started, MLB announced an expanded playoff format that will see 16 teams qualify. Yesterday, the league announced another structural change:
The 2020 @MLB Postseason will begin with the AL Wild Card Series on Tuesday, 9/29, while Game One of the 2020 World Series at Globe Life Field in Arlington, Texas will be played on Tuesday, 10/20. pic.twitter.com/KSzWMSAcBk
— MLB Communications (@MLB_PR) September 15, 2020
The bubble-like-substance playoffs (more on this in a moment) require some unpacking, so let’s unpack. The National League playoffs will take place in Texas — in Houston and Arlington for the NLDS, then Arlington for the NLCS. The American League playoffs will be their mirror in California — the ALDS will be in Los Angeles and San Diego, with the ALCS exclusively in San Diego.
It sounds weird, offhand, to have the NL playoffs in AL stadiums and vice versa. It’s a necessary step, however, to avoid creating home field advantage in a system designed to create neutral sites. Play AL games in Houston, and the Astros could find themselves “at” the Rays in a game played in Minute Maid. While home field advantage has been subdued this year, it also hasn’t been zero. The season is already going to be extremely weird, but MLB — rightly, in my opinion — drew the line at some playoff teams playing in their home cities.
That’s not to say it can’t happen — at least theoretically. The World Series will be played in Arlington, too, and the Rangers are not yet mathematically eliminated from postseason contention. As the only one of the four host cities not currently in playoff position — and fortuitously for MLB, the team with the newest stadium — Arlington was a natural choice for the World Series.
Oh yeah — though most news releases have called these bubble cities, and the playoffs a bubble system, that’s an inaccurate characterization. Teams in postseason contention will move to hotels next week for the final stretch of the regular season to “quarantine,” which I’ve placed in quotations because that’s not a great description of staying in a hotel but continuing to travel between cities and go to the ballpark. Many of us call that “business travel,” though baseball prefers the pandemic nomenclature.
From there, the league will establish “bubble sites” — again, quotations because of characterization — in each city. These will consist of locations near the ballpark where each team is sequestered. MLB has not yet announced a protocol for the various ballpark staff in each city, but they’ll be involved somewhere in the process as well. The teams will still travel between rounds, which further makes the term “bubble” confusing. It’s a permeable bubble that is sometimes not a bubble, I suppose.
Bubbles, or lack thereof, aside, there will be one major structural change to the postseason. For this year — and presumably this year only — the divisional and championship rounds will be played without off days. The divisional round will take place over five consecutive days, followed by a day off, followed by as many as seven consecutive days of championship series play.
To a far greater extent than the “bubble” system, this will change the way the postseason works. The former cadence of the playoffs lent itself to shortened rotations. The fifth game of the divisional series took place six days after the first — two travel days, one after the second and one after the fourth game, accounted for the time.
The way the math worked, it was hardly “strategy” to switch to a four-man rotation. It was simply the only way to do business. The starters from Game 1 and Game 2 were always available on full rest for Game 5. It’s not rocket science to use one of those two instead of a fifth starter. The two off days in the championship series enabled the same strategy.
With no travel days this year, a potential Game 5 would only be four days after the first game of the series. That would be three days’ rest for the Game 1 starter, with the alternative being a fifth starter or bullpen game. In isolation, that might lead many teams to go with the three days’ rest plan. The fifth starters for the 16 teams with the best playoff odds aren’t exactly an imposing group:
| Team | Starter | 2020 ERA | 2020 FIP | Proj ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tampa Bay Rays | Josh Fleming | 4.12 | 5.49 | 4.69 |
| Chicago White Sox | Reynaldo López | 5.52 | 6.27 | 5.00 |
| Oakland Athletics | Chris Bassitt | 2.92 | 4.05 | 4.37 |
| New York Yankees | J.A. Happ | 3.96 | 5.13 | 4.79 |
| Minnesota Twins | Michael Pineda | 3.57 | 1.62 | 4.24 |
| Houston Astros | Jose Urquidy | 3.72 | 5.79 | 4.64 |
| Cleveland Indians | Triston McKenzie | 3.91 | 4.50 | 4.96 |
| Toronto Blue Jays | Chase Anderson | 5.81 | 5.29 | 5.05 |
| Atlanta Braves | Touki Toussaint | 8.88 | 7.06 | 5.02 |
| Chicago Cubs | Alec Mills | 3.93 | 4.85 | 5.05 |
| Los Angeles Dodgers | Tony Gonsolin | 1.57 | 2.89 | 4.33 |
| Miami Marlins | José Ureña | 7.71 | 8.02 | 4.97 |
| St. Louis Cardinals | Dakota Hudson | 2.92 | 4.42 | 4.49 |
| San Diego Padres | Zach Davies | 2.48 | 3.62 | 4.44 |
| Philadelphia Phillies | Vince Velasquez | 6.46 | 4.30 | 4.53 |
| San Francisco Giants | Tyler Anderson | 4.50 | 4.55 | 4.48 |
Your mileage may vary on which of these pitchers are actually their teams’ fifth starters, but it’s a rough cut of the kind of pitching talent that would show up in these games. Most teams would jump at the chance to use a top starter on short rest over them if that were the entire equation.
Due to the compressed nature of the second round, however, it won’t work that way. After a travel day, the championship series will begin. It, too, has no rest days, which puts you in the same bind, only with your best starter unavailable to start the series. To make two starts in that round, a pitcher who threw in Game 5 of the divisional round would need to start Game 3 (on three days’ rest) and then Game 7 (on three days’ rest again).
Quantifying the cost of consecutive short-rest starts is beyond the scope of this article, but it’s not free. Use a fifth starter, and you can get two full-rest starts from your ace in the second series. Is upgrading from short rest to full rest twice in the next series worth the difference between pitching your fifth starter and pitching your ace on short rest? The answer likely varies by team, and that’s an interesting tactical consideration where none previously existed.
Of course, just because something creates interesting tactical questions doesn’t mean it’s a good idea. If your opponent could choose your best player and force them to bat once and once only in each game, choosing when to use them would be interesting, but it wouldn’t be fun, or fair, or desirable in more or less any way.
The rollout of this new structure isn’t as capricious as that, but it’s close. Per Aaron Boone, teams only learned of the new structure this week, after the trade deadline. This means that no team had a chance to prepare for this style of playoffs — fifth starters have traditionally carried less trade value than their regular season value would indicate because the playoff structure diminishes their value, which won’t be the case this year.
I’d love to see this playoff setup in coming years, because the decision between short-rest aces and fifth starters is an enjoyable decision to consider. It also amps up the drama of the game — if one team uses their fifth starter and the other their ace, there’s a great risk-reward story to be told. If one team jumps out to a lead, they might consider pulling their ace early — the Jack Flaherty gambit. There are plenty of opportunities for shenanigans.
Dropping this rule on September 15 doesn’t mean that the shenanigans won’t happen, but it does feel like it unfairly changes the rules of the game at a late stage. The Dodgers happen to have Tony Gonsolin — for my money the best fifth starter of the bunch — but other teams would likely have pursued rotation upgrades had they known this detail. The 2020 season has been full of rules changes and convenient one-season gadgetry, but that was done out of necessity. Nothing prevented MLB from making this tweak before the trade deadline, which would have made it feel far more reasonable to me.
Regardless of a random internet baseball writer’s opinions on fairness, the new postseason format is set. The games will be fast and furious, wall-to-wall baseball: as many as 24 games in four days to settle the Wild Card round, followed by another blitz of between 12 and 20 games over a six-day span.
One silver lining: this plan likely covers enough contingencies that it makes further alterations unnecessary. Bad air quality in California? The league is leaning toward using Phoneix as an alternate site. Want to bring in a player from your alternate site? You can’t — teams will submit 40-man rosters to MLB by September 20 and “quarantine” the whole group. Fans in the stands? Uh… okay, this one isn’t settled yet.
For the most part though, the structure of the playoffs is set, at long last. All that remains is a sprint through the last two weeks of the season, followed by a second sprint through the postseason. May your fifth starters be ever in your favor — at least for 2020. Oh, and — also maybe 2021 and beyond. Rob Manfred told The Washington Post that the expanded postseason is likely to remain beyond 2020 if owners get their way, a distressing possibility for a sport that still plans to play 162-game regular seasons.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
It would be difficult to figure out all these logistics and not have some teams find out earlier than others. Perhaps before the trade deadline. MLB couldn’t plan the bubbles without extensive involvement of the teams that own the selected postseason stadiums, right?
Not only does it make the fifth starter more important, it makes it more important for starters to go deeper into games. Without an off day every 2 – 3 days it’s a lot harder to throw your three best relievers out there every single day and shorten every game to 6 innings.
It also makes a bullpen game harder. If that’s going to be game 5, it comes after your fourth and third best starters who are less likely to have pitched deep into the previous games so you used more relievers the previous two days already. Pitching depth in general just got MUCH more important.
I think that’s a great consequence of this setup. In recent years with so many off days built in, we would see teams use the same three relievers over. And over. And over. In every close game, and to protect every lead.
Now? Your seventh guy out of the pen may have a meaningful role to play, or you may not be able to deploy stud reliever A for two innings today, and again for two innings in the next game the day after tomorrow. All of which I think are good things.
Kudos for not parroting the terms bubble and quarantine like other writers are doing.
How is Hudson the Cards 5th SPer? More like #3
Possibly, depending on how you feel about Kim. I personally think they’re about equivalent. Right now, though, I wouldn’t put Carlos Martinez above them, and Wainwright and Flaherty are clearly the top two. You can then make cases for Ponce de Leon and Oviedo (and Gomber).
So, at best, he’s a number 3, more likely a 4. Gradations at that point are highly arguable.
Kim is a far superior pitcher to Hudson.
That would be your mileage varying …
However you rank them though, the Cardinals are right up there with the Dodgers and Padres for the best starting 5 in the game right now. If Martinez can get back on track by the end of the season, that’s a deadly rotation that no one will want to face.
This is completely fine for A’s fans, with six plausible pitchers you wouldn’t be appalled to have out there and not one reliable ace or even reliable #2 – I mean, Fiers shows as #1 on the Fangraphs depth chart and sure Luzardo is better than Fiers but not by so much you’d make a big deal over it. Note that this model of a staff is never a bad model for the regular season; make this a permanent change in the playoffs and the new market efficiency could easily be pitching staffs of 5 or more reliably average starters who go for 5-6 innings, combined with above average bullpens, and never a moment’s thought given to one or a few precarious, soon to be injured, aces.
Ironically, the changes to the playoff timing make the playoffs more like regular baseball when all the other changes this season have gone in the opposite direction.
I’d love it if they kept this change. I think it’s desirable to have postseason ball reward the same roster construction as regular season ball.
They can take all the other changes back, though.
I don’t like the idea of potentially having 7 straight playoff games without a day off (especially for the bullpens), but I’d take it if it meant they’d use the extra days to expand the Wild Card play-in game to a best-of-3 series.
Keep the Wild Card at one game. Expand the four LDS to best-of-seven. Eliminate off days.
Win-win… win.
MLB’s haphazard use of “quarantine” and “bubble” remind me of the photos I see on social media where people post photos with their arms around each other and masks off to commemorate their “socially distanced” gatherings.
This all seems orchestrated to mimic the NHL and NBA as much as possible and I think the reasoning is “it seems to be working for them so if this all blows up in our faces we can say we were just doing what they did.”
It’s probably a good idea to eliminate cross country air travel for the post season, but I suspect it’s more about MLB covering their asses.
It sounds like this is more a “lower risk zone” than a “bubble” and a “low-contact time” rather than “quarantine”. That is a step in the right direction, and it might be enough if everyone follows the rules. But if we have uncontrolled spread at the start of the playoffs then all bets are off.
Seems unnecessary. KC Chiefs just had 22k people in attendance in their open air stadium. Most MLB stadia are open air. Most US Cities have hit 20% seroprevalence. The time for panic is over.
When you’re walking outside and can smell someone’s cigarette from twenty feet away, here’s what’s happening: The smoke molecules are exhaled from the smoker’s respiratory system, travel through the air, and enter your respiratory system.
If you’re in open air and close enough to smell someone’s cigarette, you’re close enough to catch COVID.
Also:
— FAR too early to say whether the Chiefs game was a superspreader event.
— Who exactly is panicing?
The CDC says you’re unlikely to catch Covid unless you’re in the company of an infected person for 15 minutes, so you’re not catching it by passing someone outside.
What is the goal here — zero cases? We’ve already flattened the curve. Deaths are decoupling from cases due to better treatments (who knew respirators/ventilators were actually killers?) and the average case age going younger. Colleges now are where cases seem to be growing and this age group is no more in danger from Covid than the flu.
We’ve had constant protests in open air with thousands of people and no big spikes in cities that already had their first wave. Now, most cities have already had their first wave. In these, indoor restaurants and gyms are open at limited capacity. NFL teams are flying around the country. Cases are growing in the hinterlands and will slow there once they reach 20% seroprevalence.
So this “bubble” is all theater right?
These are just a series of bad takes. Wow.
They all seemed like pretty reasonable takes to me. What else would explain a massive increase in cases over the summer but essentially a flat number of deaths, much reduced from the Mar-Apr peak?
the increase in number of cases is due to a way increased testing capacity, where instead of only testing exposed or symptomatic people, anybody can get a test and asymptomatic people are testing positive. Treatments have definitely gotten better as our understanding of the virus grows, but when your lungs aren’t working our only current widespread option is a ventilator.
Let’s see how many of those 22k who were “just” at the stadium end up getting sick before we declare that it was unnecessary to keep them out of the stadium.
So beyond the fact that you just used the “all my friends jumped off a bridge so I should too” excuse (among other things in there), it’s worth pointing out that the MLB does not care at all about its fans getting sick. It cares about its *players* getting sick and having to cancel playoff games, or have the spectacle of the Padres playing without Fernando Tatis Jr, Manny Machado, and Trent Grisham and all the second guessing about that. So not only are you wrong about the point you are making, you are wrong about the point you are making even being relevant to the conversation.
They’re tested daily. How would they get sick? Yoan Moncada & Freddie Freeman got sick before the season started. Testing positive and “getting sick” are not the same thing for this age group. Else, protesters would be hospitalized in droves.
The NFL is a bigger industry than MLB. Their play is not socially distanced. They’re tested daily. Are you expecting loads of players falling sick there? You predicted loads of players getting sick during MLB, didn’t you? Why didn’t that happen?
Have you heard what yoan moncada has said about Covid’s impact on his body?
It seems like “setting up your rotation for the playoffs” just got way less important. If a team is going to use every starter exactly once over a five game series, who pitches which game gets way less important.
I had that thought at first as well. But the first playoff series will be best-of-3. So, having your top 2 starters start the first series is still as important as it always has been.
I like the no rest as days off would favor the teams with dominant pitchers in that first series. the 8th seeded (today) Indians shouldn’t be given time to throw Bieber twice in that first series on short rest against the top seed.
Yes and no. If you win in less than 5 you get off days which just became much more valuable to your bullpen. You want to be the team that won in 5 and used 6 relievers two days before, or the team that swept in 3 and has a fully armed and operational bullpen to call on?
Even in a 5-game series, not every starter will be used if the series doesn’t go the maximum number of games. You’ll still need to use your 3 best starters within the first 3 games just to make sure they each get a start before you potentially get swept out in just those 3 games.
I’d be interested to know how this changes Fangraphs projection models? I believe they do use player projections in those models. Will there be adjustments that will alter certain teams odds of advancing in the postseason? If so, this should definitely be shared.
Also, Dan’s Zips modeling: same comment as above.
So the playoff schedule is compressed: what happens when a team has several positive COVID test results? Can’t find anything in press releases on how that it handled.
“Dropping this rule on September 15 doesn’t mean that the shenanigans won’t happen, but it does feel like it unfairly changes the rules of the game at a late stage.”
***THIS*** right here. Manfred changed the playoff rules hours before first pitch, and then changes the playoff format two weeks before the playoffs… just making things up on the fly. What a joke.
If they can play in their home stadiums now, no reason they couldn’t play in them for the playoffs….
We’ve had 6 different COVID cancellation events in less than two months. MLB has dealt with that by shortening some teams’ regular seasons and giving up on a uniform number of games played.
If we have cancellation events in the playoffs, which they’ve already scheduled without days off, what are they going to do about that? Would you prefer to have a best-of-3 Championship series or keep playing into November? Doubleheaders with no days off? They need to reduce the risk more if they want the playoffs to proceed properly.
This approach also puts all games into venues that can reliably host postseason baseball well into the fall/winter without encountering weather issues in the event of scheduling disruptions. The aggressive schedule means there’s no wiggle room for weather postponements, not to mention there are a lot of playoff-bound teams from places where weather could be miserable in November if there are any covid issues.
I’d prefer no games in this scenario this year. Doesn’t feel like a legitimate season or champion at all. It is a consolation prize at the end, nothing more really.
Dumb. Everybody is playing under the same rules. This championship will be more legitimate than the 2017 one.
The rules are ridiculous. 2017 is legitimate, no issue with that. All the covid rules of this season make it an exhibition season. Just like the nba and nhl “champions”, having playoffs after a 5 month layoff, beyond dumb.
The history books will note your objection just below where it lists the 2020 champion, no doubt.
Maybe not panic and cancel games just because one person in the team’s entourage tested positive?
The issue isn’t with the stadiums themselves, it’s the travel. The time spent inside on planes and buses is much risker than the time spent outside during the games or in other areas, where it’s easier to remain socially distant. This approach obviously isn’t as air-tight as the NBA or NHL bubble, but it’s a compromise designed to decrease risk wherever it’s possible in a minimally invasive way.
It also seems to be an implicit concession to the Players Union, which was definitely not sounding too excited about strict bubble restrictions.
Well, it wouldn’t be 2020 if this didn’t get super weird, and the prospect of watching the Yankees and Dodgers play every day in the World Series in an empty stadium in Arlington… is super weird.
Probably won’t be the Yankees if they have to beat a team 2 of 3x just to get to the next round. With that said, I think they are intending on having fans in Texas. I read that was one of the reasons they chose Texas, because Texas allows fans at this juncture.
“If your opponent could choose your best player and force them to bat once and once only in each game, choosing when to use them would be interesting, but it wouldn’t be fun, or fair, or desirable in more or less any way.”
Just wondering why this wouldn’t be fair (assuming both teams would have this right).
Because the best players for two teams aren’t the same. WAR isn’t perfectly distributed believe or not. I.E: The Angels would lose a much larger percentage of their value by losing Trout, than the athletics would Canha.
Right, but by those lights then why shouldn’t the unequal distribution of WAR be considered unfair, and why wouldn’t a measure that levels the playing field (by removing outliers like Trout) be considered fairer?
The schedule shows what is really important to MLB.
Why are there 3 days off after the first 3 game Wild Card round? Because they are trying to avoid TV competition on the weekend. Yet they do have weekend games in the rounds going forward.
I personally prefer not to see 5th starters forced into action at critical junctures of the playoff series’ . When games are even more critical having that guy as a potential long reliever – when reliever depth will be tested by the compressed schedules anyway – is a benefit. So if they dropped 2 of these early off days and 1 in the World Series (have 1 off day after game 4?), that would give them an option to add 1 off day after game 3 of the DS and game 4 of CS , with 1 in reserve, to shorten the playoffs by a day, or provide a bit of flexibility to adjust to any health issues if they arise. Teams could then do fine with 4 man playoff rotations.
And I might think Montgomery would be the Yanks 5th starter rather than Happ based on the “veteran presence” Yanks (and others) seem to fall back on.
Just my take. The rules apply to all so there is inherent fairness, though a number of comments by team personnel that have suggested no one knew this was coming is strange – could have been better handled.
How big are the active rosters going to be?