Los Angeles Dodgers Top 49 Prospects

Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Los Angeles Dodgers. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. This is the fourth year we’re delineating between two anticipated relief roles, the abbreviations for which you’ll see in the “position” column below: MIRP for multi-inning relief pitchers, and SIRP for single-inning relief pitchers. The ETAs listed generally correspond to the year a player has to be added to the 40-man roster to avoid being made eligible for the Rule 5 draft. Manual adjustments are made where they seem appropriate, but we use that as a rule of thumb.
A quick overview of what FV (Future Value) means can be found here. A much deeper overview can be found here.
All of the ranked prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details (and updated TrackMan data from various sources) than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | River Ryan | 25.5 | AAA | SP | 2025 | 55 |
| 2 | Dalton Rushing | 23.0 | A+ | C | 2026 | 50 |
| 3 | Diego Cartaya | 22.5 | AA | C | 2024 | 50 |
| 4 | Thayron Liranzo | 20.7 | A | C | 2027 | 50 |
| 5 | Kyle Hurt | 25.8 | MLB | SP | 2024 | 50 |
| 6 | Joendry Vargas | 18.3 | R | SS | 2029 | 50 |
| 7 | Andy Pages | 23.2 | AAA | RF | 2024 | 45+ |
| 8 | Josue De Paula | 18.8 | A | LF | 2026 | 45+ |
| 9 | Emil Morales | 17.4 | R | SS | 2030 | 45+ |
| 10 | Nick Frasso | 25.4 | AAA | SP | 2024 | 45+ |
| 11 | Justin Wrobleski | 23.6 | A+ | SP | 2025 | 45 |
| 12 | Eduardo Quintero | 18.5 | R | CF | 2028 | 45 |
| 13 | Gavin Stone | 25.4 | MLB | SIRP | 2024 | 45 |
| 14 | Payton Martin | 19.8 | A | SP | 2027 | 45 |
| 15 | Peter Heubeck | 21.6 | A+ | SP | 2026 | 40+ |
| 16 | Oswaldo Osorio | 18.9 | R | SS | 2028 | 40+ |
| 17 | Jackson Ferris | 20.1 | A | SP | 2027 | 40+ |
| 18 | Maddux Bruns | 21.7 | A+ | SIRP | 2026 | 40+ |
| 19 | Ronan Kopp | 21.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2026 | 40+ |
| 20 | Reynaldo Yean | 20.2 | A | SIRP | 2026 | 40+ |
| 21 | Edgardo Henriquez | 21.7 | A | SP | 2025 | 40+ |
| 22 | Carlos Duran | 22.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2025 | 40+ |
| 23 | Landon Knack | 27.1 | AAA | SP | 2024 | 40 |
| 24 | Hyun-Seok Jang | 20.0 | R | SP | 2029 | 40 |
| 25 | Hunter Feduccia | 26.7 | AAA | C | 2024 | 40 |
| 26 | Trey Sweeney | 23.9 | AA | SS | 2025 | 40 |
| 27 | Noah Miller | 21.3 | A+ | SS | 2026 | 40 |
| 28 | Alexander Albertus | 19.3 | R | 3B | 2028 | 40 |
| 29 | Samuel Munoz | 19.4 | R | 1B | 2028 | 40 |
| 30 | Jesus Tillero | 17.8 | R | SP | 2028 | 40 |
| 31 | Brady Smith | 19.1 | R | SP | 2028 | 40 |
| 32 | Kendall George | 19.3 | A | CF | 2028 | 40 |
| 33 | Jose Ramos | 23.2 | AA | RF | 2025 | 40 |
| 34 | Jake Gelof | 22.0 | A | 3B | 2026 | 40 |
| 35 | Ricky Vanasco | 25.4 | AAA | SIRP | 2024 | 40 |
| 36 | Sauryn Lao | 24.5 | AA | SIRP | 2024 | 40 |
| 37 | Eriq Swan | 22.3 | R | SIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 38 | Wyatt Crowell | 22.4 | R | SP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 39 | Austin Gauthier | 24.8 | AA | 2B | 2025 | 35+ |
| 40 | Chris Campos | 23.6 | A | SP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 41 | Jose Rodriguez | 22.6 | A | SP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 42 | Alex Freeland | 22.5 | A+ | SS | 2027 | 35+ |
| 43 | Ben Casparius | 25.1 | AA | MIRP | 2025 | 35+ |
| 44 | Juan Morillo | 25.0 | A+ | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 45 | Lucas Wepf | 24.2 | A+ | SIRP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 46 | Dylan Campbell | 21.7 | A | RF | 2026 | 35+ |
| 47 | Madison Jeffrey | 24.0 | A | SIRP | 2026 | 35+ |
| 48 | Jesus Galiz | 20.2 | A | C | 2027 | 35+ |
| 49 | Alex Makarewich | 22.1 | R | SIRP | 2028 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Depth Starter Types
John Rooney, LHP
Justin Chambers, LHP
Orlando Ortiz-Mayr, RHP
Roque Gutierrez, RHP
Hyun-il Choi, RHP
Christian Romero, RHP
Rooney is a 27-year-old lefty who could make a spot start tomorrow if he had to, commanding in a low-90s sinker/cutter/slider mix. Chambers is more of a dev project, a high school lefty acquired from Milwaukee for Bryan Hudson. He currently has 40-grade stuff, but all three of his pitches have a shot to be at least average. Ortiz-Mayr and Gutierrez are undersized strike-throwers built like Ramon Ortiz. Choi and Romero have impact offspeed pitches.
Many, Many Guys Who Throw Hard Enough To Be Interesting
Franklin De La Paz, LHP
Michael Hobbs, RHP
Angel Cruz, RHP
Kelvin Bautista, LHP
Jake Pilarski, RHP
Alvaro Benua, RHP
Braydon Fisher, RHP
Jerming Rosario, RHP
Carlos De Los Santos, RHP
Joel Ibarra, RHP
Kelvin Ramirez, RHP
Christian Suarez, LHP
Dailoui Abad, RHP
Cam Day, RHP
The Dodgers tend to be good at developing velocity and end up with a whole host of pitchers who are of note because they throw hard, which is often enough on its own to make them interesting to other teams. De La Paz had a long TJ rehab and didn’t quite kick the door down upon his return, but he remains pretty interesting because he has rare arm strength for a lefty sidearmer and his slider has huge break. He’s a little too erratic to be relied upon at the big league level, but he has nasty LOOGY stuff. Hobbs is a high-effort, three-pitch reliever with average big league stuff that plays up a bit because of big extension. He has a fairly standard vertical fastball/breaking ball attack. Cruz is a projectable DSL righty with a funky cross-bodied delivery and a big slider. He kind of looks like early-stages Freddy Peralta or Adam Ottavino, relief risk and all.
Now we get into the part of the group where virtually everyone has command issues that meaningfully impact their profile. Bautista (acquired in a trade with Texas for Dennis Santana) is a little guy and has a good breaking ball. Pilarski started throwing hard in a lab and was in the upper-90s last spring, but he fell more into the mid-90s during the regular season. He’s a stiffer, older guy. Benua, 21, sits 94-97 and is somewhat deceptive, but he’s also a bigger, fairly stiff athlete and not as likely to fix that as most 21-year-olds. The next five pitchers are all max-effort mid-90s guys. Rosario’s slider command makes him slightly more reliable than the rest of that group. Suarez also has a good breaking ball, but his fastball relies on angle rather than velo. Abad, 21, is a 93-96 mph sinker/slider guy. Day, undrafted out of Utah, was sitting 94-95 with heavy sink and a plus changeup during instructs.
More Short Pitchers
Sean Linan, RHP
Samuel Sanchez, RHP
Christian Zazueta, RHP
Nicolas Cruz, RHP
The Dodgers have targeted shorter, hyper-athletic pitching in all avenues of talent acquisition, and I think they have enough of these guys now to call it a pattern for the org. In addition to the several shawties on the main section of the list, they have a few others percolating at the complex level and below. Linan doesn’t have the frame projection of a typical 19-year-old, but he’s a flexible, low-to-the-ground athlete who throws strikes with three different pitches. His fastball sits 90 but has plus-plus ride. Sanchez is more changeup oriented and stands a chance to throw the hardest of this group, as the 5-foot-11 19-year-old has already peaked at 97. Zazueta, who came back from the Yankees for Caleb Ferguson, is a skinny, cross-fire righty with breaking ball and changeup feel. Cruz, 19, has a five-pitch mix right now and goes right at hitters.
Power Only
Mairoshendrick Martinus, SS/CF
Elias Medina, SS/3B
Easton Shelton, 1B/DH
Chris Newell, OF
Joe Vetrano, 1B
Damon Keith, OF
Kyle Nevin, 4C
Logan Wagner, 2B/3B
Martinus looks the part in the uniform perhaps more than any non-Joendry Vargas player in the org and has the athleticism to play all over the diamond, but his pitch recognition is particularly poor. Medina is another toolsy, high-risk sort similar to the Luis Yanel Diaz and Yunior Garcia types of recent Camelback summers. When I first saw Shelton on the backfields, I assumed he was some senior sign thumper, he’s so enormous and strong. He was still 17 until September. Newell (Virginia) and Vetrano (Boston College) are broad-shouldered college performers. Keith’s underlying TrackMan data from 2023 is kinda nutty — he regularly hits the ball as hard as all but a few big leaguers, we’re talking 70-grade raw on paper. His strikeout issues are severe enough that he struggled to tap into that power in the mid-minors. Nevin and Wagner (who has barely played pro ball) were both cheated onto this section; they’re as valuable for their potential defensive versatility as they are their pop.
Contact-Driven Profiles
Jeral Perez, 2B/3B
Yeiner Fernandez, C/2B
Elio Campos, 2B
Jose Izarra, SS
Bryan Gonzalez, SS
Nelson Quiroz, C
Victor Rodrigues, C
This group is pretty self-explanatory. Perez has a more balanced contact/power profile than the rest of the group, but I’m skeptical that he will sustain it as he faces better velo. Yeiner would be on the main section of the list if I felt comfortable with him playing either second base or catcher, but he isn’t especially good at either. He’s kept his strikeout rate in the 12% range as he’s entered the upper minors. Campos has the most typical big leauge body of the next three little infielders; Izarra and Gonzalez can play defense but are light in the bat. Quiroz is a switch-hitting catcher who looked erratic on both sides of the ball during instructs. Rodrigues is a stocky catcher who had among the best contact rates in the org.
System Overview
It doesn’t have the top-of-the-list star power it has tended to have during the last half decade or so, but the Dodgers system remains deep and healthy. It is a bit imbalanced, heavy on pitching and lighter on stable position player prospects. The Dodgers develop pitching as well as any organization in baseball, and they have a combination of both depth and quality that will guard their big league club against injury-related disaster for the foreseeable future. They tend to target pitchers who haven’t had a ton of reps (either because they’ve been hurt or were a two-way player) and mold them from scratch, and they’ve been able to enhance the arm strength of smaller pitchers who the industry tends to be skeptical will be able to do so.
The high-upside hitters in the premium FV tiers (40+ and above) are pretty volatile (De Paula, Cartaya, Liranzo, Osorio, Vargas, Morales, Quintero) with the exception of Rushing. These are good prospects, but the nature of the developmental process, especially when we’re talking about very young hitters, is one of attrition. It’s likely only a few of these guys will actually pan out, and even the ones who do will probably take a fair amount of time. That’s okay for now because the big league roster is so complete (though I stand by what I wrote in my 40-man roster deadline piece when I said they’re taking a risk standing pat at shortstop because I’m not convinced Gavin Lux can play there), and it’s not easy to come by great position player prospects when you’re almost always picking at the very end of each round, but this system lacks good hitters from the domestic draft.
Oh, it probably goes without saying, but Yoshinobu Yamamoto would be no. 1 on this list if we still considered all “rookies” to be “prospects.” But as Yamamoto would not net the Dodgers draft pick compensation under the Prospect Promotion Incentive program were he to win Rookie of the Year or place in the top three for MVP or the Cy Young, he was omitted. You can find his report and tool grades on the International Players section of The Board. Will his presence (and that of the large group of other foreign professionals who signed with National League teams) impact whether rival clubs have prospects on their Opening Day rosters? They would seem less incentivized to do so this year because of the crowded field of Imanaga, Matsui, Lee, and Yamamoto in the NL. If the BBWAA (of which I am not a member) resolved as a group to omit these players from their awards ballots, would it have an impact on whether or not other prospects break camp?
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Is it me or is River Ryan the Spencer Jones of pitchers?
Gets a 55 grade based on potential and being new to the position, rather than actual production (4.41 FIP and 4.83 xFIP in AA at age 24).
Obviously Eric knows a lot more than me but that 55 grade seems a bit too high for someone who’s mostly potential at this point.
Maybe he’s a 50 but gets a “+5” because he’s part of the Dodgers organization, which makes one feel pretty good about pitchers given that team’s relatively strong track record.
Could be though that makes him even more like Jones. “The Yankees did it with one giant (Judge) so they can do it with another”.
Eric has consistently said they don’t alter player grades based on organizational competency
At least til he has to undergo TJ 1 or 2 times..
deGrom had pretty mediocre stats at AAA at 25. For a guy without a lot of pitching track record, I wouldn’t be surprised if minor league stats don’t matter that much, similar to spring training. Could be that he was focusing on getting reps and developing pitches/feel, rather than specifically pitching to game success.
If the pitch grades are true (3 plus pitches with an average changeup and average command with room to grow) that’s def a 55.
Degrom was also throwing 94 mph fastballs when he was a rookie. He added almost (maybe entirely?) unprecedented velocity after he graduated. Like Shohei, he should probably not be used as a point of comparison for anyone.
“Minor league stats” doesn’t tend to be holistic, care for the individual, and rarely even considers stuff like workload (Gs or eeeesssp IP for pitchers) for whatever reason (the corp world does love low workload, pre-injured arms they can burn and turn for pennies) but DeGrom’s were excellent. His 2012 (age 24) was quietly an excellent SP prospect season even considering age and TJ, and that age 25 follow up featured nearly 150 abv avg upper minors IP from a convert in his third pro season
Idk I feel like everyone throws their hands up with MiLB pitchers, leaves a ton of info on the table that leaves the approach less analytical than it seems, and all because we can’t be certain certain
Should throw in that DeGrom was actually pretty well regarded given his pretty quiet rise. BA had him as an org top 10 guy once or twice back…Great size and build, “true” two way player in that he had a full blown college position player career and as a SS with an outstanding defensive reputation…So much to like…If I wasn’t so prejudiced against TJ then (and now rly) woulda been all over it, especially since I saw the young ML DeGrom and how he wasn’t out of place in a prospect famous rotation
If he has 3 plus pitches he should not be putting up a 12.4 swinging strike % as a 24/25 year old in AA, this not to mention the 10 HBP’s, 10.7% walk rate
I was thinking the same thing. Also, the dude does not look 6’2”
Out of curiosity, I decided to see where others have Ryan ranked. I looked at the following:
ZiPS/Dan
ESPN/Kiley
The Athletic/Keith Law
Baseball America
Baseball Prospectus
MLB Pipeline
Eric has Ryan #19 overall. The only other site that has Ryan in the top 100 is The Athletic (#33). If they’re the only site that agrees with you that’s probably not a good sign given that Law is known for having strange, idiosyncratic rankings.
Obviously, Eric and Keith may end up being correct. But the industry consensus puts Ryan as a 45/45+ prospect.
I don’t see the bad sign there. I’d rather get their honest assessment than try to match other people.
Of course they should be honest. Just showing that Eric’s evaluation is a minority opinion.
So should we call the River Ryan bandwagon fan club the River Boat?
A 60 for Andy Pages throw seems light. I’ve seen him a handful of times in AA and AFL and the arm was always a highlight. I mean strong, accurate lasers, not Jordan Walker midway up the backstop kind.
I don’t remember seeing a player’s game power rated above raw power before although I’m sure it must have happened occasionally
If you were to do current Major Leaguers, then Mookie Betts would have game power > raw power (joint 7th most HRs last year, 9th highest slug, minimum 100PA)
By a lot. His max EV among qualified batters last year was like 100 out of 133. He has like 40 raw power and 60 game power or something ridiculous like that. He’s a huge anomaly.
Wait, it’s normal for young switch-hitters to not have great barrel feel, and it’s something that they can develop over time???
I wonder if there are any other prominent prospects with 2003 birthdays, to whom that could apply…
I kid – great stuff as always, Eric!
Love these massive, in-depth lists: It’s always worth the wait.
I’ll miss Dodgers fans asking what the team could get for Michael Busch, especially when the inevitable next set of questions is “What can the team get for Diego Cartaya?”
So…what can they get for Diego Cartaya?
I’m assuming another Jackson Ferris-type of prospect! If I’m a team that has a real major leaguer who would be an upgrade for the Dodgers I’m not even asking for Cartaya. I’d ask about Rushing, Ryan, and Vargas (and in that order), and then Liranzo, Hurt, Morales, Frasso, Martin, De Paula, Osorio, and Quintero (in some order) before even thinking about Cartaya.
This take on Ferris just makes it even more confusing to me that Busch is somehow a 50 FV and t100 guy given that trade.
I think they just wanted to have the Ferris Buehler combination.
I’m pretty convinced that Ferris is a better than he is listed here and Busch is worse. Some of it is because I think pitching prospects are just worth more than you’d expect, especially because they have objectively a worse chance of succeeding.
But I think the other part of it is that there are some real questions about Busch being able to even play first base, which puts huge pressure on the bat. I think that Busch is just not viewed in such high esteem around the league.
Remember that you also have to value Busch as a competent 2B defender who’s guaranteed to hit for a 135 wRC+
I, for one, firmly believe that a 25 year old having a big year in the PCL with a tiny automated strike zone should answer any and every question about his bat!!!
I’m a Cubs fan so there’s bias but you’re sleeping on how tight Busch’s 2023 was – nailed the periphs and batted ball, PCL or no .323/.431/.618 isn’t a joke – and selling short his background in general. He’s got nearly 3000 PAs btw college and MiLB at .281/.403/.511. Guy’s going to hit, maybe most suffers from being a pre-pandemic (ancient times) first since the league’s added say 6000 other Prospects for a $1.50 split btw 30 teams since he was drafted. Even the defensive background otw towards probably ending up a DH less scary than it could be
He’s consistently been old for his level…and consistently struck out a lot.
Bryan LaHair made a lot more contact in the high minors.
What even is struck out alot on a guy with a .400+ OBP and power? He’s at 23% in 1640 pro PAs, average, and coming off sub-20%
The age is less than ideal but that’s pretty much the only less than ideal da numbah from 2023. My big non-bust worry there is he’s more DH than 1B. Even that’s hardly an issue with the Cubs needing both and most a LHH who makes hard contact in their air and gets on base
You literally suggested the Dodgers should trade Busch for Jorge Mateo. They got Jackson Ferris who has significant value as a top 10 LHP prospect. They are ridiculously low on him here. So your idea that Busch had no value was ridiculous. Dodgers just had no room
Yeah Mateo turned out to suck after all, huh? The version if Mateo I was thinking of was better than Ferris. They’re low on him here but both Busch and Ferris are 45s.
The version of Mateo where barley being an above average hitter was massively over achieving? No, he was never worth a Ferris or Busch level prospect. The Dodgers #1 player on this list came for a player who was designated for assignment. I think they know how to judge talent. They got as good as they could get for Busch and if they want to move on from Cartaya they will then too.
The difference is busch was at least raking
I’m very skeptical of pop-up pitching prospects. It seems like they can’t sustain the success over more innings or they blow out their arm or they lose all of their command. I think a lot of these guys are relievers as a result. The Dodgers only need a few to turn into actual starters but I’m not sure they will get there.
I am higher on Osorio though. I think maybe we might be overthinking a situation where a guy shows real power in the complex league as a teenager while possibly also sticking at shortstop.
I’m very skeptical of
pop-uppitching prospects.Them too!
Aren’t all pitching prospects “popups”? How many 21 year olds have established track records in anything? If anything a guy pitching full time at 95 mph since 16 might be considered more of an injury risk
Pretty much anyone who isn’t a “pop up” is either about to lose rookie eligibility or a Top 100 type. I think of a “pop up” guy as someone whose stuff suddenly takes a big leap forward unexpectedly. Guys like that who go from throwing like a 35 year old junkballer to suddenly having way more velocity or movement…they worry me.
I think every Top 100 guy I can think of who is not a popup prospect is a guy who pitched well in college. Skenes, Horton, Wicks, Whisenhunt, Meyer, Thorpe…of course, you can still be one of those guys who is suddenly awesome and you’re still a good prospect, like River Ryan or Jackson Jobe (although Jobe always had good stuff, he wasn’t ever like this). I just worry when a huge number of guys on a list are of this type.
Short answer is “no,” there’s clearly a difference in talent and polish from like a Noble Meyer than a standard shiny new.
The two Ricketts rebuilds + the pandemic has introduced me to a more prospectotheweek format. Spencer Howard’s been my go to national guy for pop up: blew up as a 21 YO college draftee who spent the whole breakout year putting up decent numbahs but too old for A ball, non-first out of a small college program, not a strike thrower, low workloads…I thought if he was going to Make It in the MLs it would be as a RP, maybe a SP opp opened up if his strength and conditioning improved getting closer to FA but alas
This continues to be weird take with regards to the Dodgers until someone can point to a prospect that has broken as a result of any tinkering from the team!
as a fellow fan, i feel like i could give even the most experienced padres fans 50 guesses for who AJ Preller decided to acquire from the dodgers to give up River ryan…
preller can build a farm system, but please someone take away the trade button from him…
My mental image of Preller is a guy who got really good at prospect evaluation so he could fund his real addiction: trading Guys for guys
All that talk of their historic farm system a few years ago, and basically the only guy who has translated is Tatis. Almost everyone else has been traded away or performed poorly.
jury still out on Campusano
personally, i’m ok with trading like Gore/Abrams/Woods/Hassell away, cuz at least it’s Juan Soto coming back. Even if Woods goes nuts… but that’ll be tough to swallow
Was fine to move Patino/Trammell, haven’t panned out. Other guys are kind of negligible too. But it’s the lower tier prospects that i guess Preller gets credit for finding, but deals away before they even get valuable. So we get pennies for them. Brash, Munoz, Clase, Bednar would be the best bullpen in MLB. All drafted and traded away. At least Bednar got back musgrove
Out of every trade Tampa Bay made, the one I liked the most for the Rays was the Snell deal. But the Padres absolutely won the Snell deal. (they also won the Cronenworth trade too, the Padres should trade with the Rays more often)
As someone who thinks FG *criminally* undervalues elite relievers by treating WAR as the be-all, end-all (Billy Wagner had a higher RE24 than Chuck Finley, because coming in with the bases loaded and 1 out and getting out of it is REALLY VALIABLE) “getting back Musgrove” isn’t something that should treated as an aside.
Musgrove is a bona fide #2 starter!
agree, that was not fair to hometown hero joe musgrove, who also has our franchise’s only no-no!
Gore and Hassell aren’t going to fulfill their lofty prospect potential, and Abrams has a lot of risk in his hit tool (even after the great 2nd half he had).
Even if Wood is an All-Star, Bell and Soto got you a trip to the NLCS in 2022, and there’s a significant number of alternate realities where the 2023 Padres get marginally better sequencing/luck/”clutch” and make the playoffs.
Ty France has been a good player for Seattle too.
I’d actually say the large majority of preller’s trades have ended up doing well. What he does poorly is clearly building a team of player development that uses data in the best way possible to maximize his talent as well as him being ultra controlling which hurts communication. The trades and drafts have been good, the around the edges stuff that the rays/dodgers succeed at is what he’s failed at
Andy Pages exit velos are low because he has extreme pull rates as well. Not really feasible to hit the ball 110+ mph down the line. If it were, the fences wouldn’t be ~320 feet. There is still an industry disconnect here. See: Paredes, Isaac.
So you’re saying Pages is a future Tampa Bay Ray?
Payton Martin is the arm to dream on here, size be darned. So fluid, so competitive, and still is learning how to actually pitch.
The team that just graduated Bobby Miller and had this offseason can take a year off! Without perusing yet I like Maddux Bruns, been on Cartaya for a while so dig the patience
I know he doesn’t qualify for the list any more, but I’m curious if anyone has a take on Miguel Vargas. I can’t quite tell if 2023 was a lost year due to injury or whether he wasn’t quite the guy we thought we would be.
IDK the book on him before he came up was that he had below-average power and no obvious position, so that was always going to put a ton of pressure on the hit tool. It turned out the hit tool wasn’t enough to compensate, and the Dodgers wishcasted that he could play second base because that’s what they needed but he couldn’t.
If he gets enough playing time to work things out, I would guess the most likely scenario is that he eventually figures out a better strategy at the plate and turns himself into a league-average or maybe slightly better hitter. But that would probably leave him as a non-traditional, R/R first baseman with below average power. If he can play a functional third base it would go a long, long way to taking pressure off the bat. But the list of teams willing to give him a shot there would be super small–like, the Nationals and the A’s. If he can only play first base then I suppose he could stick around, there were about 8 teams who got less than a 100 wRC+ out of their first basemen last year. And this is all dependent on someone giving him enough run to actually figure things out, when the more likely scenario is that he burns through his last option year while getting yo-yo’d between the minors and majors and then goes and plays abroad.
he was definitely affected by his injuries last year, he’s come out and said so this spring. he also appears ticketed for left field for the immediate future. that said, sadtrombone is probably right about how he turns out, whether for the dodgers or not, and he probably ends up with profar’s career.
I understand there is unique context to the situation but I can’t understand River Ryan being a top 100 prospect given his mediocre output at his age (to be polite).
“Again, the amount of juice De Paula is likely to grow into and how short to the ball he’s able to be are enticing attributes that make us scared of undervaluing him here.”
That fear seems appropriate.
I love the Kyle Hurt take here. It’s one of the few write-ups I’ve seen that gets his value. No way do I rank him over De Paula.
i get the downside on george given speedy dudes with no power have basically evaporated from mlb, but: (i) an 18 year old who walks as much as he did in 2023 while maintaining that crazy speed is something to watch; and (ii) i’d sell a toe on someone’s left foot for another brett butler.
kid might be the fastest player in milb, hit .370 last year, and walked a bunch – he’s super interesting to me.