In Violating Health and Safety Protocols, Plesac, Clevinger, Laureano Become Cautionary Tales

This week, key players on two American League playoff contenders made mistakes pertaining to COVID-19 protocols that will cost them significant chunks of the shortened 2020 season. Cleveland starting pitchers Mike Clevinger and Zach Plesac — two key members of what has been the majors’ most effective rotation thus far — were both placed on the restricted list by the team and ordered to self-quarantine for three days after sneaking out of the team hotel in Chicago. Meanwhile, Oakland center fielder Ramón Laureano was suspended for six games by Major League Baseball for his part in a bench-clearing incident that occurred in Sunday’s game against Houston.

The two situations are different in their particulars, but they share some commonalities. In a normal season, the actions of these players might not have generated more than a series of stern lectures behind closed doors, and whatever suspensions they led to would have been blips on the radar amid a 162-game schedule. However, the pandemic has necessitated new rules and regulations — over 100 pages of them in MLB’s 2020 Operations Manual — and all three players crossed lines that not only violated those rules but increased the risk of infection for themselves and their teammates. Their punishments have been amplified, perhaps disproportionally, albeit as a warning to other players.

The saga of the Indians’ starters unfolded in stages. On Sunday, the team sent Plesac, a 25-year-old righty with 24 major league starts under his belt, back to Cleveland after he left the hotel without permission and went out with friends on Saturday evening. As innocuous as it sounds, that’s now prohibited under the revised protocols MLB issued last week in the wake of outbreaks on the Marlins and Cardinals; any player wishing to leave the hotel on a road trip is required to obtain permission from the team’s compliance officer.

Plesac’s actions greatly upset both the Cleveland brass and his teammates. Mindful of the possibility that he had been exposed to someone with an infection and could trigger an outbreak, the team quickly moved to isolate him from the rest of the traveling party, arranging a car service to send him back to Cleveland. According to The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal and Zack Meisel, both Plesac and the driver were given instant tests to ensure they were not already infected.

For as well as Plesac has pitched — he’s the latest of Cleveland’s homegrown success stories, posting a 1.29 ERA and 2.27 FIP in 21 innings, including six shutout frames against the White Sox on Saturday — he was already in jeopardy either of being optioned to the club’s alternate site in Lake County, Ohio, or moved to the bullpen, as the Indians won’t need a fifth starter again until August 22. Instead, he was sent to quarantine for at least three days, during which time he’ll be tested daily.

Plesac’s teammates met on Sunday morning to discuss the violation and its ramifications, and Clevinger, a 29-year-old righty who has emerged as one of the AL’s top pitchers over the past three seasons, sat through that meeting. Only on Monday night, after he had flown home with the team, was it revealed to the public that he, too, had gone out with Plesac; team president Chris Antonetti declined to explain the specifics of how he learned about each pitcher’s infraction. Clevinger was scratched from Tuesday’s start against the Cubs and, like Plesac, placed in quarantine, with a daily testing regimen as well.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Adam Plutko, who replaced Clevinger and threw four innings of one-run ball in a loss, sounded infuriated with his teammates:

Plutko was referring to earlier statements by both players, who last month were vocal about following the protocols. Via The Athletic’s Meisel:

“There are common-sense situations, where you see things are packed, or going out to the bars and drinking. Doing stuff like that isn’t stuff that’s really important to us right now and shouldn’t be important to us right now. We’re given this privilege to be able to come back and play and given this short window to even play. It’s a good time now just to really buckle down and focus on what’s important and work toward something greater at the end of the season, and for these couple months, lock in and focus on what we have set for us at the end of the year.” — Zach Plesac, July 3

“Having that trust in your teammates is a big thing. It’s a big thing on the field. If you feel your teammate doesn’t trust you off the field, how are you going to feel like he trusts you when you get between the lines?” — Mike Clevinger, July 30

Particularly given that rotation-mate Carlos Carrasco missed significant time last year with chronic myeloid leukemia, and that manager Terry Francona has dealt with multiple health issues in recent years (including a just-concluded nine-day absence due to a gastrointestinal problem), neither player was assumed to be paying mere lip service to the rules. They both failed to live up to their statements, and Clevinger did even worse, initially lying about his participation and then exposing others until the lie was discovered.

Both pitchers have since apologized to teammates and the public, with Clevinger admitting the extent to which he jeopardized those around him:

Additionally, both have been placed on the restricted list by the team. They’re still being paid and receiving service time, can be activated at the team’s discretion, and don’t count against 28-and 40-man roster limits. They might remained quarantined for as long as 14 days in accordance with CDC guidelines (of course, if either gets sick, they could be out longer). Accordingly, our Depth Charts and Playoff Odds have been adjusted to reflect their absences, with each pitcher losing about 10-12 innings; Clevinger, who was projected for 68 innings at the outset of the season and who has thrown 16.2 (with a 3.24 ERA but a gaudy 6.15 FIP), is now estimated to have another 39 innings remaining, while Plesac, initially estimated for 48 innings but on pace to exceed that thanks to his strong performances, is now projected to have 31 remaining.

Plutko, projected to provide a 5.32 ERA and 5.29 FIP, is picking up much of the slack, which is a noticeable step down given Clevinger’s talent — he pitched to a 2.71 ERA and 2.49 FIP in 126 innings last year — and it comes at a point when the AL Central is no longer the perennial two-team battle between Minnesota and Cleveland. The Twins, who have fallen to 11-7 by losing five out of their last six games, are still one game ahead of Cleveland (10-8), but the upstart Tigers (9-6) are in between the two, and the White Sox (9-9) are in fourth, one game further back. After Saturday’s win, Cleveland was estimated to have a 28.1% chance at winning the division and an 89.4% chance at the playoffs, the league’s fourth-highest mark. They’ve been bailed out to some degree by Minnesota’s slump; with the outages factored in, Cleveland’s odds of winning the division are up to 32.0%, though their overall chances are down to 88.3%.

Of course, if either pitcher gets sick and spreads it to teammates who are forced out of action, those odds will drop, but even apart from that, these were dumb, premeditated, and unforced errors by players who obviously knew better. That separates what they did from the heat-of-the-moment transgression of Laureano, who lost his cool mid-game after being hit by a pitch three times during the A’s three-game series against the Astros in Oakland, though none of them appeared intentional. Humberto Castellanos hit him on the left elbow with an 88 mph sinker in the 12th inning of Friday night’s game, then Brandon Bailey — for whom Laureano was traded on November 20, 2017 — drilled him in the left shoulder with a 91 mph fastball in the fifth inning of Sunday’s game. Finally, Castellanos plunked him again in the back with a 78 mph curveball in the seventh inning of the same game.

The understandably frustrated 26-year-old center fielder lingered in the vicinity of home plate after being hit, gesturing at Castellanos before heading towards first base, though catcher Martín Maldonado and two members of the umpiring crew made sure he didn’t charge the mound. Once he got to first base, he and Astros hitting coach Alex Cintrón began shouting at one another. Cintrón motioned to Laureano, as if to invite an altercation, and Laureano charged, making it almost all the way to the warning track in Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum’s large foul territory before being intercepted by a pair of Astros; catcher Dustin Garneau tackled him.

Laureano said on Monday that Cintrón made a derogatory comment about his mother, telling ESPN the hitting coach “said in Spanish something you don’t say about my mother.”

In its 2020 Operations Manual, which set out the COVID-19-specific health and safety protocols in place for this season, MLB said that it would strictly enforce prohibitions against unsportsmanlike conduct:

The prohibitions against unsportsmanlike conduct (see OBR 6.04) will be strictly enforced during Spring Training, the championship season, and postseason, to prevent unnecessary physical contact and support physical distancing between individuals on the playing field. In this respect, players and managers should maintain physical distancing from all umpires and opposing players on the playing field whenever possible. Players or managers who leave their positions to argue with umpires, come within six feet of an umpire or opposing player or manager for the purpose of argument, or engage in altercations on the field are subject to immediate ejection and discipline, including fines and suspensions.

That prohibition figured into the eight-game suspension MLB handed Dodgers reliever Joe Kelly for throwing behind the Astros’ Alex Bregman and then inciting a bench-clearing incident on July 28, though the reliever’s previous track record (he was suspended six games for intentionally hitting the Yankees’ Tyler Austin in 2018) and commissioner Rob Manfred’s warning against retaliating against the Astros for their illegal sign-stealing efforts also weighed into MLB vice president of on-field operations Chris Young’s ruling.

There’s nothing to suggest that Laureano’s reaction had anything to do with sign-stealing, though Cintrón is alleged to have played a significant role in that (more on which momentarily), but by charging the coach, he did draw players from both sides out of the dugout. Compare his six-game suspension (10% of the season) with the ones doled out by MLB for the more severe (and let’s face it, more entertaining) July 30, 2019 brawl between the Pirates and Reds: 10 games (6.2%) for Keone Kela for intentionally headhunting, eight (5%) for Amir Garrett for charging the Pittsburgh bench and throwing a punch, five (3.7%) for José Osuna and three (1.9%) for Yasiel Puig and Kyle Crick for aggressive and/or inappropriate actions in the brawl, plus three for Jared Hughes for intentionally throwing at Starling Marte.

In other words, despite never throwing a punch, Laureano’s suspension is double in proportion to Garrett, who did. It’s also double in proportion to the eight-game 2013 suspension of Padres outfielder Carlos Quentin, who charged the mound and slammed into the Dodgers’ Zack Greinke, breaking his left collarbone. That seems extreme, but MLB clearly believes that the extra risk to which Laureano’s actions exposed other players counts for something in this weird year. For what it’s worth, the outfielder expressed regret for his role in the fracas (“You can’t be doing that as a coach. He was wrong for doing that. But I’m a man. I couldn’t keep my cool, and I should have. I wasted my time with that guy…”), but he thanked Garneau, his teammate last year in Oakland, for protecting him from getting injured in the pileup.

As for Cintrón, he denied insulting Laureano’s mother but drew an even harsher suspension from MLB: 20 games, a record for a coach. Though he had a right to appeal his suspension — managers and coaches are eligible for membership in the Major League Baseball Players Association — he accepted it and apologized via a statement in which he noted that coaches “are held to a higher standard and should be an example to the players.”

This isn’t the first time Cintrón has failed to live up to those standards; Manfred’s file on Cintron might be nearly as thick as his file for Kelly. In the ALCS opener last fall, he gave Yankees manager Aaron Boone the finger when the Yankees voiced concerns about whistling from the Houston dugout, which they believed to be part of a sign-stealing ploy. Additionally, Cintrón’s name surfaced in the Codebreaker-related emails of Tom Koch-Weser, the team’s director of advance information, to general manager Jeff Luhnow. Per the Wall Street Journal’s Jared Diamond, Cintron “was believed to be involved in transmitting information from the video room to the dugout.”

Anyway, this isn’t the place to relitigate the Astros’ sign-stealing saga and the non-punishment of the players involved, and the loss of Cintrón even for a substantial stretch will likely have a negligible effect on the Astros’ record. The loss of Laureano for six games — perhaps one or two fewer, if he wins his appeal — will have a bigger effect on the A’s, though as it happens, the team (12-6 at this writing) has a 4.5-game lead on the struggling Astros (7-10) and a 95.9% chance of making the playoffs, second-highest in the league.

After the adjustments to our depth charts, Laureano is estimated to lose 19 plate appearances, which prorates to 51 over the course of a 162-game season. That translates to a few more games in center field for Mark Canha’s, who has outhit him 145 to 130 in terms of wRC+ since the start of 2019 (albeit with a significant deficit against lefties) but is a notably worse center fielder (career UZR/150 of -9.3, versus 0.7 for Laureano); it also means a bit more exposure for lesser hitters at the corners such as Robbie Grossman, Seth Brown, and Chad Pinder. The suspension is unlikely to cost the A’s a playoff spot, particularly in a division where they’re currently the only team above .500, but having the wrong hitter or fielder at the wrong time could cost them a game, leading to a lower seeding and thus a less favorable series matchup.

In an ordinary year, the actions of Clevinger, Plesac, Laureano, and Cintrón would be considered comparatively minor. Clearly, the stakes are higher for a team that has grown particularly sensitive to the health and safety of its own, and for a league that has recently been forced to fend off questions as to the wisdom and propriety of proceeding amid multiple coronavirus outbreaks. The rules are different in 2020, and so are the penalties, and both the Indians and MLB have made that clear.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

45 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
ascheffMember since 2017
5 years ago

I know it was a major discussion point in the Kelly suspension as well, but I’m not sure treating punishments as a proportion of the season missed the right way to frame them. Eight games in a 60 season is more impactful than eight games in a 162 game season, but the punishment is still the same.

Obviously MLB hasn’t always been context-agnostic with their punishments, but I think they should be. I strongly disagreed with the league’s decision to allow Yuli Gurriel to keep playing in the 2017 World Series and serve his suspension the next year, because I think he earned the suspension and shouldn’t have gotten the consideration of serving it at a more convenient time. I think the league is right in this case though. I don’t think they should shorten suspensions just because it’s a short season and any punishment will be disproportionately worse for the team.

I don’t think the purpose of punishments is or should be a set penalty to the player’s team’s World Series winning odds. That leads to some problematic moral considerations, like is a suspension-worthy action taken by someone on a noncompetitive team like the Orioles worse than the same action taken by a Dodger? Obviously the World Series impact of a long suspension to, say, Austin Hays wouldn’t be the same as a suspension to Mookie Betts, but if the actions was the same, then I think the punishments should be.

Pwn Shop
5 years ago
Reply to  ascheff

I’m going to respectfully disagree with you on the point of missing a season-proportion. Look at football as an extreme example, an 8-game suspension is half the year. Because this year is a special case (more like football number of games), I believe they should be prorating to the shorter season.

Travis LMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  Pwn Shop

Football regularly hands out suspensions for 25% of the season.

WARrior
5 years ago
Reply to  ascheff

This is a good point. I’ve been wondering about the proportionality, too. Consider that Trout’s three game paternity leave (he ended up taking four, but the team got three for roster changes) was not down-sized for the short season. Missing Trout for three games in a 60 game season hurts the team more than in a 162 game season, so conversely, being allowed to replace him on the roster for three games helps the team more than it would in a 162 game season. The counter-argument is that this isn’t about the team, it’s about allowing the player sufficient time to attend an important event. But Trout or most any other player is going to take off time, anyway. The roster replacement rule is all about the team, so why not adjust it to the shortened season?

Regarding the Laureano suspension, why aren’t all the players who participated in the brawl given some, if lesser, suspension? They’re a source of endangerment, and are aware of this.

Finally, note that the three day quarantine is playing the odds. Some people don’t test positive even a week after becoming infected with the virus. It’s a minority, but allowing a player back because he’s negative after three days is taking a calculated risk. (But I note that Jay adds they might have to stay out longer).

Shirtless George Brett
5 years ago

Morons.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago

I hate people too!

Psychic... Powerless...
5 years ago

Some gems from Clevinger’s Twitter account:

— “ᵗʰᵉ ᵒˡᵈᵉʳ ʸᵒᵘ ᵈᵒ ᵍᵉᵗ, ᵗʰᵉ ᵐᵒʳᵉ ʳᵘˡᵉˢ ᵗʰᵉʸ’ʳᵉ ᵍᵒⁿⁿᵃ ᵗʳʸ ᵗᵒ ᵍᵉᵗ ʸᵒᵘ ᵗᵒ ᶠᵒˡˡᵒʷ, ᵗʰᵃᵗ’ˢ ʷʰᵉⁿ ʸᵒᵘ ʲᵘˢᵗ ᵍᵒᵗᵗᵃ ᵏᵉᵉᵖ ᵒⁿ ˡⁱᵛⁱⁿ”
— “I knew all the rules, but the rules did not know me”

He knew what the rules were, he decided they were beneath him, and then he chose to lie to and potentially endanger the health of his teammates. Now he’s trying to frame these deliberate, premeditated actions as “mistakes.” Pathetic.

dl80Member since 2026
5 years ago

And he’s 29, not some immature 18-year-old. Even Plesac is 25.

EccentricChemistMember since 2020
5 years ago

Given that this pandemic is more political hysteria and more or less only affects the elderly, yea, I can see why he would want to live free eather than being a sheep.

Jason BMember since 2017
5 years ago

“SHEEPLE!!1!ONE”

Dumb comment is dumb…

Spahn_and_Sain
5 years ago

This pandemic disproportionately kills men, so shouldn’t we all be watching women’s sports instead?

martyvan90Member since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  Spahn_and_Sain

Outstanding comment.

HoratioSky
5 years ago

Excellent point and correct. I wonder how many of the downvoters realize every time they get in their car, they are doing more harm than Clevinger & Pleasac. The average human never becomes any wiser though, no matter how many sources of information they have.

Bobby Ayala
5 years ago
Reply to  HoratioSky

If you’re not an epidemiologist or an immunologist, shut the hell up.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago
Reply to  Bobby Ayala

An informed comment! There is some burden of proof put on ideas that challenge whatever is trending on Twitter, but mean-spirited, frivolous comments like this are met with less contempt. I have seen experts say things to that extent, but I doubt you would be interested in those.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago

How do you feel about the billions of people that will leave their homes today? Pathetic is not the term you are looking for.

emh1969
5 years ago

I honestly don’t see how Cleveland can let Plesac or Clevinger come back any time soon. Way too much risk, particularly for Carrasco.

fjtorres
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

They only need the fifth starter on the 22nd so missing one is no issue.
Missing both, which forces Plutko into the rotation and weakens the pen, is the problem. Not something they can afford with the way the hitting is going. But if somebody starts hitting they might survive the next Plutko start.

At least we know who’s the next starter to get traded; Clevinger, presumably when MacKenzie steps up but possibly sooner. Especially if Plutko’s surprising start proves enduring. Clevinger just went from tolerably weird to a black sheep.

emh1969
5 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

I think Clevinger would have been on the trading block regardless, particularly with the emergence of Plesac and Civale. Whether this year or next, Indians definitely need a bat and he’s the most expendable at this point.

fjtorres
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

He pretty much volunteered with the stunt he pulled.
He also hurt his trade value so it can’t be this year.
Who’s going to want a potential typhoid Mary?

Shirtless George Brett
5 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Teams have repeatedly shown they don’t give a damn about what players do off the field. If they can help them win, they will play them.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago

I disagree. I think teams care too much about what players do off the field. For some folks, the fact that some players are not completely blackballed is offensive. I think many teams care more about Twitter buzz than winning games in 2020.

carterMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

Eh Franmil is hitting nearly .300. While the power hasn’t been there, it will be soon. You cannot reasonably expect their entire lineup to continue to not hit.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago
Reply to  carter

You also should not expect Franmil to hit .300 for long.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

I doubt CLE is building anything and as such they don’t have needs. They will probably lose Lindor soon… well, I guess that decision is what will determine everything else but I figured that they were tearing down more than building. I would love to see them contend as I like them but I don’t think they are a team that is thinking needs.

MikeSMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

Yeah, 3 days is a dumb quarantine length. They could be infected and still testing negative at three days. With most respiratory viruses, people are most infectious in the 2 days before they show symptoms, which seems to occur 5 – 12 days after exposure with COVID, if it is going to. It is hard to think of a three day quarantine as anything but Infection Control Theater.

OneearMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

I agree completely. It’s like MLB isn’t even trying to do the right thing, just trying to save face.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

You are thinking that every game doesn’t represent a similar level of risk? How many other players did something similar and didn’t get a press release accompanying it? There is no certainty that the protocols minimize Carrasco’s risk even if followed. If Carrasco is at that much risk, then he probably shouldn’t be out there. Playing MLB baseball this season is not the best way to avoid a pandemic.

Themaven
5 years ago

Plesac breaking protocol is a knucklehead move,no question.
Clevinger joining Plesac in breaking said protocol and then lying to the organization and his teammates about it and then getting on a plane with a fellow member of the rotation who has Acute Myeloid Leukemia is a whole other thing.
I would like to see Clevinger defend his actions to Carlos Carrasco’s wife and kids.

Clevinger has lost any respect I had for him,but who cares about me.
His teammates, on the other hand, will never be able to completely trust and or respect him again.
That’s worse than any fine or suspension.

All for a couple of brewskis.

MikeSMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Themaven

Carrasco has CHRONIC Myeloid Leukemia (CML), which is a very, very, very different thing than acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Dan GreerMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

Quite true. The outlook for AML is significantly worse.

bglick4
5 years ago
Reply to  Themaven

I was always of a mind that, with all the money involved, the players would take this seriously especially after the Marlins and Cardinals. But, if these two didn’t we can guess there are players on other teams doing the same thing. The Cards won’t be the the last team to get this. I hope it isn’t my team.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago
Reply to  bglick4

Just for one moment imagine that the media is sensationalizing any of this. Are these protocols reasonable or well though out? I am sure many of the players choose to live their lives as millions of other world citizens do. When teams get outbreaks it won’t be anyone’s fault. This is a pandemic and you can’t stop it. You can see that if you want or you can try to find a scapegoat for something that appears to be inevitable. No set of rules or protocols are going to stop this. Really the only thing that we control is how much we fear it and our level of compassion for each other in these difficult times. The idea that this is something that one can escape should be pretty easy to see through at this point. The protocols will never work and it will always be spun as being someone’s fault. When the protocols always fail, then what is the point of the protocols? At the end of the season, we can count up the damage and see how it worked out. I think there is a good chance that there won’t be a lot of actual damage at the end of the season. I believe that the hate in these comments will add up to more damage than the total of the pandemic on the MLB players. There is also the reality that they were getting Covid without playing baseball too.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago
Reply to  Themaven

In the real world people don’t have to defend themselves to their friends…. that is a Twitter comment. It is reflective of a society without friends, family or reasonable mental health. In reality, I am sure Carlos already talked about playing baseball this season with his wife and kids. This pandemic is not anyone’s fault.

ttrav
5 years ago

Nick Markakis just opted back in. What changed his mind because he certainly thinks the danger is reduced after three weeks of play.

MikeSMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  ttrav

Probably just got the itch to play so bad it overcame his concerns. Like guys who come out of retirement because they don;t know what to do with themselves away from the game.

bglick4
5 years ago
Reply to  ttrav

I wonder if he was satisfied that his teammates were taking things seriously? I know I’ve opted in to some activities only after I was convinced the precautions were being followed. If this is the case, his faith in his teammates thus far looks to have been well placed.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago
Reply to  bglick4

Lol how no mention of Puig not signing

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago
Reply to  ttrav

Puig not signing is what changed his mind. He was out of a job but now he has a starting job waiting for him. Obviously it was never about risk.

MorboTheAnnihilator
5 years ago

Cintrón’s suspension was not long enough. He should have at a minimum been suspended for the rest of the season. But, considering his previous behavior and the strong evidence that he was instrumental in the sign stealing scandal, a permeant ban(with the possibility or reinstatement) might be more appropriate.

bglick4
5 years ago

I don’t see why any decent organization would tolerate this level of unprofessional am from their coaches. How can such a smart organization be so rotten?

Jason BMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  bglick4

Eh, “smart” is neutral – smarts alone doesn’t confer either virtue or vice.

HecubotMember since 2022
5 years ago

Only fair to note that Robbie Grossman is not a “lesser hitter” this season. At least to-date his wRC+ is 196 over 15 games, and his ISO is a career best .289.

BreadbakerMember since 2022
5 years ago

There’s an interesting perspective in an article in, of all things, the New York Times Arts & Leisure section this past Sunday, about Actors Equity approving a production of Godspell in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, subject to serious restrictions on actor movement, number of audience members and a bunch of other things. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/05/theater/godspell-berkshires-coronavirus.html?searchResultPosition=2 What struck me in reading the article was that the actors all understood they were in a unique situation where they were testing the waters for not just themselves, but for the entire acting profession, as to whether it was possible to give live performances at all (Berkshire County, Mass. has done an extraordinary job of controlling the virus). Actors and stagehands all had the right to ask for rehearsals to stop at any time if they had concerns about spacing, usage of props, etc., plus there was a specific official who could do the same, again at any time.

The sense I get is that baseball is not under anything like this degree of control. This article talks about two bench-clearing brawls already, occurring in stadiums without fans, in a young season. Someone, not an umpire but a health and safety official appointed by league and union together, should have been empowered at any point where tempers would seem to be flaring to essentially stop the game and tell the players and others to reset themselves or the game would be called. Given what’s happened to the Marlins and Cardinals already, anything short of this puts lives at risk. And I’d think just having the mechanism in place would be a lot of deterrent for it occurring.

RonnieDobbs
5 years ago

How many other folks in these organizations also violated protocols? I would bet that the answer is a lot. I am certain that these protocols are ad ill conceived as is everything else that MLB puts its hands on. Speculating about them getting sick or spreading it to someone else and describing their actions as dumb, premeditated, and unforced errors is the kind of absurd narrative that is tearing our society apart. Twitter condones that kind of rhetoric but that doesn’t make it excusable in a functional society.