Injuries Cause Yankee Gloom, Don’t Spell Yankee Doom
On April 20th, 1977, Billy Martin, then in his first of approximately 176 stints as the Yankees’ manager, pulled a lineup out of his hat. Literally. In order to shake up a team that started the year 2-8 and was suffering the bouts of media drama notable for the team during this era, Martin set the batting order by putting the names of the starters on paper and selecting them from a hat. The team’s usual cleanup hitter, Chris Chambliss, hit 8th, meaning that the lie we tell to little kids about how the No. 8 spot is the “second cleanup hitter” was actually true for possibly the first time in human history. Whether coincidental or not, the Yankees won six games straight with only a couple minor changes to this pseudo-random lineup before the team returned to a more traditionally configured one.
The Yankee lineup on Sunday looked quite a lot like this lineup, but taken one step farther to even make the names random. Of course, this wasn’t due to any homage to the late, great Martin, but a necessity fueled by injuries to, well, nearly everybody. You might be excused if you thought someone goofed and you were looking at one of the team’s Grapefruit League lineups from this spring.
Narrator: You were not.

Only a single player in the lineup, Luke Voit, was both present and playing the position envisioned when the Yankees put together their roster (Gleyber Torres was healthy, but was given an off-day). Four players didn’t even start the season, just over three weeks old, on the 25-man roster, and a fifth, Mike Tauchman, was only acquired a week before Opening Day.
Naturally, the lineup, which would have shocked people a month ago, scored seven runs, eventually winning in ten innings. We’ll have to wait until the Yankees next play the Royals in late May to see if they broke some unwritten rule about crushing pitchers with their B-squad that apparently requires hitting people with baseballs.
[Update: Since I am getting old and my memory is occasionally spotty, the original version referenced the Fillmyer game when it was the Jorge Lopez game that had the lineup referenced. Aaron Judge was still available when they beat up on Fillmyer. -DS]
The larger truth, of course, is that the difference in position players is so small in baseball that the difference between average or good players and great players is almost non-existent in any one game. It doesn’t tell us how well the Yankees will survive overall with the losses due to injury.
To get an idea of how much health is responsible for changing the outlook, I ran two sets of ZiPS projections, one with the Yankees and the current assumptions for injuries and one if the Yankees suddenly got healthy, at least healthy enough to match the preseason playing time assumptions from this point on.
| Team | W | L | GB | PCT | DIV% | WC% | PLAYOFF% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York Yankees | 94 | 68 | — | .580 | 48.9% | 34.4% | 83.3% |
| Tampa Bay Rays | 93 | 69 | 1 | .574 | 35.1% | 40.1% | 75.2% |
| Boston Red Sox | 90 | 72 | 4 | .556 | 15.8% | 37.4% | 53.2% |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 76 | 86 | 18 | .469 | 0.2% | 1.3% | 1.4% |
| Baltimore Orioles | 57 | 105 | 37 | .352 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Team | W | L | GB | PCT | DIV% | WC% | PLAYOFF% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York Yankees | 97 | 65 | — | .599 | 64.8% | 27.6% | 92.3% |
| Tampa Bay Rays | 92 | 70 | 5 | .568 | 24.7% | 48.2% | 72.9% |
| Boston Red Sox | 89 | 73 | 8 | .549 | 10.5% | 39.6% | 50.1% |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 76 | 86 | 21 | .469 | 0.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Baltimore Orioles | 56 | 106 | 41 | .346 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Now, there’s a significant loss in wins, but so far, the Yankees have only lost three victories relative to the projections based on the changes in playing time assumptions over the last month. The sunnier preseason projections, after all, already had injuries to Aaron Hicks, Luis Severino, Miguel Andujar, and Didi Gregorius baked into the cake.
But let’s be even gloomier. Let’s pretend that Hicks, Andujar, Gregorius, Stanton, Judge, and Bird are all out for the season. This is of course a far darker scenario than what appears to be the likely, but what’s the fun of having a projection system if you’re not going to test out weird possibilities?
That leaves a defensive lineup looking something like this:
C Austin Romine
1B Mike Ford
2B DJ LeMahieu
SS Torres
3B Giovanny Urshela
LF Clint Frazier
CF Brett Gardner
RF Tauchman
DH Voit
| Team | W | L | GB | PCT | DIV% | WC% | PLAYOFF% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tampa Bay Rays | 94 | 68 | — | .580 | 55.9% | 25.8% | 81.8% |
| Boston Red Sox | 90 | 72 | 4 | .556 | 26.2% | 34.5% | 60.7% |
| New York Yankees | 88 | 74 | 6 | .543 | 17.5% | 30.1% | 47.6% |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 77 | 85 | 17 | .475 | 0.4% | 1.9% | 2.4% |
| Baltimore Orioles | 58 | 104 | 36 | .358 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Now, it pushes the Yankees to third in the division, but even this dark scenario doesn’t push the club out of contention. And with the missing losses due to injury rather than under-performance, it’s a more obvious scenario for the Yankees to be aggressive in making an acquisition, while something might be trickier if the problem was simply players who should be performing well but aren’t.
That the Yankees have this much survivability is testament to some responsible planning we talked about this offseason. Given the high likelihood of contention, the Yankees largely over-engineered their lineup. Facing Gregorius being gone at the start of the season, they brought in Troy Tulowitzki and LeMahieu, even without an obvious way to get both starter-level playing time before Gregorius’s return. Facing the Hicks injury, the Yankees weren’t content to just say “whatever, we have Frazier,” so they acquired Tauchman, an interesting spare part who the Rockies had little interest in exploring, in essence preparing for the next injury. There haven’t been as many nasty pitching surprises since the Severino injury, but even the Yankees there saw the wisdom of signing Gio Gonzalez (although he was recently released) in order to have a cheap fallback option in the case of another injury or simple disappointment from Domingo German or Jonathan Loaisiga.
Nor have the Yankees stopped adding fallback options. Just this month, the club have added Logan Morrison and Brad Miller (and even Cliff Pennington, who ZiPS is very much unexcited about).
The result of all this planning is that New York’s emergency lineups just aren’t that bad. In that Sunday lineup, every player is projected by ZiPS at above replacement level and generally beyond one WAR. It looks a lot like how the Astros built their starting rotation in 2018, not sweating the fact that Collin McHugh, a starter for the Astros since 2014, would be in relief. It’s also a lesson that the Red Sox and Indians took very poorly; the Red Sox might as well have been in stasis this winter and are paper-thin in multiple areas while the Indians have a starting lineup that can’t adequately survive not having the 2018 versions of Francisco Lindor and Jose Ramirez.
In essence, the Yankees lost a lot of wins above replacement, but they lost a lot fewer wins above Yankee replacement level by virtue of planning for a rainy day. The Yankees brought an umbrella to the 2019 season and it’s keeping them dry.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Is Gary Sanchez also presumed to be out for the year in the gloom projections?
I know it’s extra work but I would love to see one in which all Yankees return when they have reported they will (like mid may, June, July, etc. depending on the publically available reports to the media). And then one in which all currently injured players are out the entire year. It seems like, unless I’m reading it wrong, the author just picked a handful of the position players, and I’m not sure why those ones were picked while others were not and no pitchers either.
Nah. It’s because Sanchez already has a set return date. Wednesday. He choose position players who have no set date for return yet
Is it fair to say that Brian Cashman had a mid-career change where he suddenly became much more adept at identifying cheap value (coinciding right around the time of the ownership change, RIP George). The Yankees, the year they won around 84 games, made the Aroldis and Miller trades, which now look incredible. They also have traded for guys low like Luke Voit and, more impressively, Aaron Hicks (who raked in the minors and has always been a plus on defense).
These moves definitely contrasted with a prior-era Cashman who used to take flyers on older players who were passed there prime (guys like Nick Johnson) and give out big free agent deals which made up the majority of the teams production. I’m definitely excited to see that he’s really seemed to improve in the scouting and development areas (maybe all the credit shouldn’t go to him). I definitely don’t think in todays day and age if A-Rod opted out of his first big contract you would see the Yankees re-sign him (then again maybe know one would given the direction baseball has taken fiscally).
I think it’s less that Cashman had a philosophical change in his strategy so much as he suddenly was given full control to make decisions. Cashman was not shy about verbalizing moves that were not of his doing/preference. Case in point the Rafael Soriano deal: http://www.espn.com/new-york/mlb/news/story?id=6037544
I don’t think there’s evidence to say that Cashman himself has changed drastically. We do know that he’s been given more free rein to run the team, and perhaps that is the difference.
For example, it seemed like Hank Steinbrenner was calling the shots when the second A-Rod contract went down. Since then, we haven’t seen much of Hank. Hal has taken over, and in turn, let Cashman have more control.
I do believe that Cashman generally has improved and continues to improve his approach, and incorporated analytics and scouting.
Hard to say how much has been Cashman changing over time (I’d imagine some of it is that) and how much of it has been the increased control that he’s been given. Would be a good question to ask him, since he generally gives pretty honest answers. Whatever the case, its now been several years in a row where zero-excitement reserve signings have played a big role in the yankees success. From Hicks, to Voit, to Urshela and Tauchman, he’s done a really good job identifying value – in ways, that I don’t think the Yankees did as well even a decade ago.
I agree with the idea that a lot of it has to do with the change in his amount of control. Thats why I referenced the ownership change to his sons but I prolly should have included that. Regardless, I’m impressed with Cashman’s ability for acquiring cheap production given that the Yankees could easily paper over holes in the roster by overpaying FAs.
Cash changed, in no small part to the emergence and development of sound analytics. Greater control obviously allowed him to pursue data based decision making.
Definitely with the passing of George, there was a shift in philosophy. The second contract of A-Rod, was largely an ownership decision. The Yankees have made more value moves in this decade, and the only real time they went away from that was the 2013 offseason with the Ellsbury/McCann/Beltran signings, which were rumored to be ownership signings as well (at least the ellsbury signing was). They also wanted to sign Shin-Soo Choo after the Ellsbury signing which would have been another potential headache. Cashman has been allowed to have more free control over the team, and Yankee fans act like its a bad thing. (George would be rolling over in his grave if he saw this lineup!) Yeah, George would have traded that young core long before they ever made it to the Bronx
Cash was always a fan of cheap value, but he has only been able to fully implement his vision around 2005, when they started to go analytical.
The Yankees have been using some systems engineering theory w/ the idea of redundancy/granularity of talent. Ultimately, you’re better off with 4 5 WAR players rather than 9,7, 3, 1 WAR quartet b/c of injury risk. Of course, this assumes that these are true talent measures. The other big difference is that the Yankees are doing very well in assessing breakout/breakdown candidates by not making any obvious mistakes and taking good risk/reward chances like Voit, Hicks and Gregorius. (This used to include Green as well)
Ownership philosophy changed and Cashman has certainly evolved, keeping the Yankees at the forefront of applying “analytics” both in MLB and in player development. The game has also changed, though. Using aging veterans as key building blocks made more sense 10, 15 years ago than it would today.
Different context, but a lot of similarities philosophically (not signing mega-FAs being a notable philosophical difference). Signing Troy Tulowitzki in 2019 has some similarities to bringing back Nick Johnson in 2010, for example, so it’s not like they’re out of the business of taking flyers. The Yankees have also been known to offer attractive minor league deals to build AAA depth for a while.
Player development strikes me as the biggest difference. The high end talent is widely discussed (e.g., Judge, Sanchez, Severino). The depth, though, has been really impressive and is part of what is keeping them afloat now. Internally developed guys, acquisitions, guys acquired and then developed… all flavors of acceptable, if not exciting, players.
If the Yankees had really planned for a rainy day, they wouldn’t be spending one of the lowest percentages of revenue on payroll (https://tinyurl.com/yxmhjcya). On the roster would be names like Scherzer, Verlander, Harper and Machado. I don’t know what goes into the black box of ZiPS, but projecting the current team now at 88-wins seems incredibly aggressive. But, who knows, that projection might be dead on. Regardless, the Yankees would have still been much better off using their clear advantage in resources to sign as many elite players as possible…provided the point is to win games and not maximize profit margin.
A 12-10 record, when extrapolated out to 162 results in 88 wins. And not spending on every big name to hit free agency, developing your own young core and preserving your financial flexibility seems EXACTLY like planning for a rainy day.
I think the point is that they have financial flexibility no matter what. When your profit is $300M/yr, you can go out and spend another $100M on player salaries and still have plenty of flexibility. The Yankees have de-prioritized winning compared to profitability over the last 10 years (look at their payrolls of the mid-2000’s).
Now there may be a meta-argument to be made that their free-spending resulted in the current luxury tax situation and if they go out and spend $300M they may get a hard cap, but it is a bit ridiculous they have to do the MLBPA’s job for them and do it by spending less on player salaries(!)
Feels like Cashman has found a new market inefficiency: Late 20 somethings who have raked at AA/AAA, but struggled in limited plate appearances in MLB (usually due to low BABIP or being used as a sub instead of a regular). Voit, Tauchman, and Urshela all fit this mold to varying degrees.
But according to most Yankee fans, Brian Cashman and his band of nerds (yes this is still an insult when referring to baseball analytics in 2019) need to be fired. God, I hate the majority of this fanbase
Just ignore them. I’m often embarrassed to be a Yankee fan, because of their “sign every big name free agent in an attempt to buy championships” attitude (and how well did that work in the 2000s?).
Right now, seeing their success (or at least relative, small-sample-size success) with this ragtag lineup is way more satisfying.
It’s 100 times more fun to see guys like Urshela and Tauchman (who were picked up for pennies on the dollar) succeed than it is for $30M+ Harpers and Machados “do what they’re supposed to.”
I think the sane fans look towards Rothschild and him being the de facto mentor to Boone, while seemingly unable to be proactive or reactive when needed.
Cahsman should have signed one of the young studs available, but that doesn’t mean he’s done a poor job by any stretch.
The 2019 New York Icari keep shocking us: how long can they cheat regression?
Pretty much every depth signing they’ve made has been important so far. They’ve had to use all of those players. In light of that, it’s very surprising that they would let Gio go. They would have to option someone to AAA, but based on recent history, too many players now will soon turn into just enough.
I think the bigger issue with Gio is not that they couldn’t fit him in somewhere, but the amount of money he’d be making and the fact that he’s unlikely to be any good in the AL (certainly, the odds of him being better than any of the Yankees current top 7 or 8 SP options are pretty slim).
I might be missing something here (and I havent looked at each projection individually), but I don’t see how in the world that lineup plus an injury-riddled pitching staff results in an 88 win projection.
I would really want a new pitching coach if I were a Yankees fan