Scouting Rusney Castillo

The Red Sox continued their recent run of asset collection, signing Cuban OF Rusney Castillo to a 7-year, $72.5 million deal yesterday.  You can Google around the internet and find a reasonably accurate scouting report, or a grainy, old video from his days playing in Cuba and Dave did a good job breaking down what the value/expectations are for what we understand Castillo to be as a player.   I didn’t want to collect all this existing information and give you a long post to skim, so I’ll share scouting grades I got from a number of scouts that have seen him, and some explanation of what that means for Castillo’s projection.

Hit:  40/50, Game Power:  45/50, Raw Power: 55/55, Speed: 70/70, Field: 50/60, Throw: 50/50

(See the primer for the org rankings if you aren’t familiar with the 20-80 scouting scale, though I explain some of it below)

The most important thing for Castillo are the hit and game power grades, but there’s a lot of uncertainty amongst scouts on those grades.  Castillo hasn’t played in an organized game for awhile, can take wild cuts in batting practice to show his raw power and, like some Cuban defectors before him, changed his body composition a good bit with a new training regimen leading up to his big payday.

Traditionally, scouts would be bearish on Cuban prospects like this and some team desperate for good PR or any kind of talent would overpay.  In the last decade or so, Cuban hitters have been on a great run and scouts are adjusting the potential outcomes accordingly.  Most think Castillo has big league ability now, but will need a minor league period to adjust to game speed.  The expectations are something around average hit/power tools (.260 to .270 and 15-20 homers) but this is a volatile enough situation that both tools could be below average or above average in the short term (and the long-term, too).

The surprising thing from Castillo’s recent workouts was that his added muscle didn’t cost him any speed.  He’s not polished in the outfield, but should be able to stick in center with some work.  He’s even rougher in the infield, but some teams were interested in trying him at second base.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

For those wondering who the next Cuban bat is to watch, I wrote up outfielder Yasmani Tomas for my old employers two months ago when he defected.  If he has the same positive body change after defecting that we’ve seen from Castillo and Yasiel Puig, he has the ability to draw a big contract, but he’s still months away from getting the necessary paperwork far enough along to hold open workouts.





Kiley McDaniel has worked as an executive and scout, most recently for the Atlanta Braves, also for the New York Yankees, Baltimore Orioles and Pittsburgh Pirates. He's written for ESPN, Fox Sports and Baseball Prospectus. Follow him on twitter.

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Daniel
11 years ago

Seems like Castillo could be a Josh Harrison-type with less BA and more speed.

Tomas is a guy I hope the Mets go after. We sorely need an affordable RF with high potential.

Alpha Male
11 years ago

bro!

Matthew TobinMember since 2025
11 years ago

What are your thoughts on a Desmond Jennings comp? A realistic 10-15 HR with 30 SB speed.

Iron
11 years ago

I still haven’t seen any kind of scouting report on the Cuban the Reds signed for $27 Million a couple months ago. Or even seen his name spelled the same twice. Rasiel/Raciel/Raisel Iglesias, mystery man.

Iron
11 years ago
Reply to  Kiley McDaniel

Thanks.

Tom
11 years ago

I hate average to slightly above average hit tools with less than average fielding tools (to me, you have to be able to play defense to stay in a mlb lineup consistently). OTOH, Puig makes up for his cluelessness in the OF with serious athleticism (I am guessing his hit tool assessment before mlb was way better than Castillo), and seems to be learning the position. Does Castillo have that kind of athelticism?

The flying squirrel
11 years ago

Sounds like we just got jacoby ellsbury for half the price. Some would say Castillo might be more risky since he’s unproven, but considering ellsbury’s injury history Castillo could prove to be more valuable as a more reliable and cheaper alternative to jacoby.

DeQuarium Lumpkin
11 years ago

I’ve been digging through the Hall of Fame’s scouting report database for position players and translating tool grades to WAR based on Carson Cistulli’s article. What I’ve been finding is that future projection of tools and Overall Future Potential grades are forecasts of a player’s peak season WAR.

Your forecast for Castillo suggests the following range of outcomes: 1) no change from present grades, 2) achieves future grades, 3) achieves future grades and taps into his raw power potential. Here’s what his WAR per 600 PA looks like under each scenario:

1) 1.3 WAR
2) 3.4 WAR
3) 3.9 WAR

This lines up with Dave Cameron’s comparison of Castillo to Shane Victorino, but it also highlights just how much his success hinges on his hit and power tools developing from where they’re at now.

DeQuarium Lumpkin
11 years ago
Sinnycal
11 years ago

Am I the only person who just doesn’t buy into this guy at all? I know it’s dangerous to scout the stats, but at some point it’s difficult to be inspired by a player who put up a 128 OPS+ in his mid-20’s in a league populated by teenagers and considered roughly equivalent to A+ ball. I just have a hard time believing we’d be talking about the scouting grades slapped onto an American player’s tools after a choreographed workout if that player had most recently put up a .677 OPS at 25 in his fifth season in the California league.

Ryan Sullivan Kelley
11 years ago

First, Castillo turned 27 back in June and has played pro baseball for six years. Given that, you still believe he has a full grade of projection left in his hit and field tool?

Also, why even both with the 45/50+ game power thing? Using the 10’s scouting scale feigns precision when there’s clearly not a lot to base these reports on.

Putting it all together, would you say that Castillo profiles to be Marlon Byrd or at best, Shane Victorino?