The 2023 Draftees Are Now on The Board

Paul Skenes
Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports

Members of the 2023 draft class are now on the pro side of The Board. You can see where freshly drafted and signed players stack up in their new organization’s farm system here. Graduates have also been pulled from The Board; their evaluations are now preserved on the 2023 Graduates tab. Players who exceed rookie playing time requirements between now and the end of the season will be moved from the 2023 Updated section of The Board to the Graduates section in real time, and those who graduate get a scouting update on their player page contrasting their evaluation with their performance at time of graduation. Note that the farm system rankings from prior to the graduates removal still exist here; live farm system rankings (for which the grads no longer count) exist here. These will shift and change as prospects move between now and the trade deadline.

Because the Top 100 grew and changed throughout the Prospect List cycle, readers should consider it live and up to date. I made some updates to Reds prospects (more on that in a second) and slid Diamondbacks outfielder Druw Jones, who succumbed to yet another injury between when the D-backs list published and now, but otherwise just pulled off the grads. There are only 89 players in the minors with a 50 FV grade or better right now because of the graduates being pulled off of the list. This is not unusual for this time of year; similar to the way the 50 FV cross section moved from 107 players to about 130 players during the last cycle, prospects who improve and advance will climb into that group.

Reds Update

Between now and the deadline, I’ll be reviewing the farm systems of a few key clubs likely to buy, something I’ve already done for the tippy top of the Reds system.

Lyon Richardson’s pitch grades have been altered to reflect that his changeup has become his best pitch. His innings count has been kept pretty conservative, and I’d really like to see him hold the 95–97 mph fastball he’s currently showing deeper into games before moving him into the 50 FV tier, but he looks really good. His command isn’t precise, but he has a mid-rotation starter’s mix and has been throwing hard since his return from TJ, just not while working a true starter’s innings load.

Cam Collier is struggling statistically, but the pro scouting reports from source clubs are still generally positive, and he is still very young for a full-season hitter. His swing is still pretty weird, but there’s just too much lefty power here to slide him so soon.

Noelvi Marte is not playing good defense right now. He’s hitting well enough that he’ll probably still be a quality big leaguer even if he has to move off of third base, but now that he is on the 40-man, he only has so long to find a position before he’s out of option years. Lurking on the horizon here is a scenario where he ends up with one or no options left and basically no position. It’s not his likeliest outcome, but because he’s looked pretty bad on defense for the last sixth months or so, this is now a conceivable outcome. I still think he will be a good big leaguer over time (he remains a 50 FV prospect on The Board), but were I a GM, I’d be apprehensive about making him the centerpiece of a trade return.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Christian Encarnacion-Strand moves up into the 45 FV tier as a power-hitting role player who’ll be a dangerous (but likely flawed) piece of this ascending Reds team. His Triple-A contact rate (72%) would be near the bottom of the MLB 1B position group (70%), and his chase rates (an eyebrow-raising 39%) were about 20% worse than big league average (32%) at the time he was called up. League-wide adjustment to his tendency to chase will make him streaky, but ultimately Encarnacion-Strand’s power is going to play in a big way because he’s incredibly strong, and his swing is geared to do big damage. There are warning signs here similar to what Elehuris Montero exhibited in the minors, even amid his awesome surface-level statistical performance, but CES is at a different level, physically.

Edwin Arroyo also slides from the 50 FV tier to the 45 FV tier. Again, he still projects to be a good big leaguer, just not a true everyday, omni-situational player in my eyes. He continues to have throwing issues that will likely funnel him to second base, which I suppose was already likely given the Elly/McLain combo ahead of him. He’s going to get to his power by virtue of his swing’s lift, but his bat-to-ball performance has regressed enough to reevaluate him in light of the new defensive projection and consider him more of a just-shy-of-average second baseman. Look at the kind of hit tool it takes to profile as an everyday second baseman. Arroyo’s performance has been fine, but not quite on that level.

You can see how punishing the De La Cruz, McLain, etc. graduations are to the Reds’ farm system ranking, but even if you consider that group to be untouchable, they have a ton of depth (nearly 50 ranked prospects) to leverage in trade discussions.





Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.

66 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

Interesting to see Skenes as a 60 on the board since he was a 55 before the draft.

I would tend to agree with the 60, despite all of the critiques I’ve heard about his fastball shape lately. Someone comped his fastball to Nathan Eovaldi’s, but Eovaldi is on pace for a 4.5 win season and has a 5+ win season in recent memory so I’m not sure that bothers me so much. And Eric cares a lot about fastball shape, so if Eric is hanging a 70 grade on it I would say it’s not something to be concerned about right now.

It also looks like Arjun Nimmala and Brice Matthews got bumped up, which I also agree with (IMO I’d bump them up to 45+ but there’s huge hit tool risk on both, so I get it).

The GuruMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

My take on it ,was the guys in the Futures game made Skenes look like a 3rd rounder. Watch Misiorowski then go watch Skenes. Every team has more than half a dozen players in their org throw 100. This issue with skenes is not just his fb shape, thats a large part, but he averages 98mph this year according to his coach on tv. He didn’t avg 101.

So you take his 98mph on 7 days rest, turn it into 5 days rest. Then you take his 3 month season and turn it into an 8 month season. Then teams are going to want run on his fb so they’ll change his grib/mechancics and now all of sudden you have another typical sec over hyped arm we see every year that turns into a bp piece that you just drafted #1 overall. He’ll be cruising 94-95 at the next level

His 94-95 won’t play up, so he’ll get moved back to the BP where he will sit 96-98 throwing 1 inning and you just drafted a bp piece at 1-1.

Last edited 2 years ago by The Guru
wokegraphs
2 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

Dude, in his last start of the year he hit 102 on his 120th pitch. If his arm stays healthy—a thing you’d caveat every pitching prospect on the planet with—he is not going to be averaging 94-95. Are you a Nats fan just hoping Crews doesn’t hit too many grounders?

68FCMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

Not sure I follow why Skenes not averaging 101 means he’s going to move to the bullpen. Averaging 94 on his fastball would put him 29th of 61 qualified MLB starters per the statcast. Most of the guys with crazy stuff in the minors like Misiorowski have command questions and high relief risk.

The GuruMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

No doubt! 94-96 is just average though. We see this every year with college rankers, Casey Mize, Jack Leiter, etc. They all win the college world series, they all have a 0 ERA, the espn SEC media hype machine gets behind them, then the sheep follow….then they get drafted 1-1….. then they dont do good.

Say Skenes does stay at 97-98 mph, his FB is too straight for that right now. Go watch Chapmans movement. Taking a look at Skenes shapes and tunnels on his secondary pitches. I’d honestly grade those below avg right now. They can obviously get better but he has work to do. I’m sure if someone does nothing but watch college they look amazing to them.

Thats whats tough about the rule 4 draft, its all based on projections

Last edited 2 years ago by The Guru
sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  68FC

I’ve more or less lost the story element that moves him from a 98-MPH guy to a 94 MPH guy, but I think it partly has to do with changing his fastball shape. If they do successfully change his fastball shape to something that is less hittable, then it will play up from 94 MPH instead of down from 98 MPH. The 98-MPH-but-plays-down guy is someone like Sandy Alcantara or Hunter Greene; the 94-MPH-but-plays-up is someone like the most recent iteration of Jordan Montgomery or Zac Gallen.

Me, I’d mostly be worried about a guy averaging 98 MPH having his arm fall off. That seems to be a thing that happens (see: Syndergaard, Severino, May…although Alcantara seems to be holding up okay). Normal pitcher attrition is going to be way more of a concern than anything specific to Skenes.

Dmjn53
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I feel like whoever used the Eovaldi comp meant it in a pessimistic way, but Nathan Eovaldi is good? He’s probably going to reach 30 WAR in his career

rickdugo3000
2 years ago

Roman Anthony still a 45+?

grandbranyanMember since 2017
2 years ago

Knoth (who hasn’t thrown a pro pitch yet) ranked over Misiorowski (who has dominated his way up the ladder to AA already this year) would be pretty awesome as a Brewers fan.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

They’re all 45s, I doubt there’s a real difference there. Anyway, Misiorowski has awesome stuff but (1) the walks are way too high and (2) he’s only pitching 3 innings at a time. I suppose there is still time, and he’s probably a major leaguer of some kind if he stays healthy, but I think he’s way more likely to wind up like Dellin Betances than Tyler Glasnow.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Dellin Betances is a pretty awesome outcome for a late 2nd round pick, in fairness!

11+ WAR during his controllable years – and all high-leverage, to boot!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

I think Misiorowski has that sort of ability, as well as lacking several abilities needed to start. Assuming he doesn’t get hurt, of course.

SteveMcAnderson
2 years ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

Kind of crazy how different Eric is on Brewers prospects than the rest of the public raters. Between Chourio being 4th, Black being 13th in org, Quero being so low and Misiorowski and Gasser being no where near the top 100, Logenhaegn sees the Brewers’ farm as much weaker than Callis, Law and BA

JovinsMember since 2025
2 years ago

Has Eric updated Brewers’ prospects since January?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

This is mostly just because it hasn’t been updated in season. Quero and Black have improved a lot since he wrote that list in November of 2022. Misiorowski and Gasser have improved too, but probably not to the top 100. Chourio as a top 5 prospect is totally fine. I would take Holliday or Caminero over him for sure, and you could make an argument for Wood too.

CWess
2 years ago

I’m getting a “404 Page Not Found” when clicking the link to the farm system rankings prior to the removal of the 2023 graduates

Meg RowleyFanGraphs Staff
2 years ago
Reply to  CWess

Yeah, we’re having an issue there (not quite sure why). You can still navigate there through the Farm System section of The Board – you want 2023 Report as the time frame.

Meg RowleyFanGraphs Staff
2 years ago
Reply to  Meg Rowley

Should be resolved now.

PC1970Member since 2024
2 years ago

Looks like being named Jackson is a key to being a top 5 prospect.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

Don’t tell Jackson Cox that, he just had Tommy John surgery

diamonddores
2 years ago

Baltimore picking Holliday over the constantly injured Jones is looking like one of the smartest draft moves in a while

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  diamonddores

The funny thing is it’s almost certain they picked him because Jones wanted full slot or more, and I highly doubt the Orioles had him flagged as a health risk or anything like that.

That said, Holliday looks like the best player in that draft. And by a lot. The Orioles clearly have a knack for this. The exact same thing happened with Heston Kjerstad at #2–everyone said it was a reach at the time. But who was taken in the first round in 2020 that you’d pick over him now? Torkelson, Lacy, Gonzales, and Martin look like busts, Hancock and Veen are stuck in neutral, and Max Meyer is recovering from TJ. You have to go down to Patrick Bailey, Mick Abel, and Pete Crow-Armstrong in the teens to find someone outperforming him from that draft right now.

Domingo AyalaMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Any idea why Kjerstad projects so poorly by ZiPs? He’s raking with a 15% K rate. He’s not young, which could be a factor.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Domingo Ayala

He was old *and* very bad in A+ last year.

Not sure how often Dan updates ZiPS for minor leaguers.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Domingo Ayala

He missed several years due to illness and post-illness complications. That will throw the projections for a loop, especially since he has no other track record to speak of.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Pretty bold take to call some of these guys busts already while pumping the tires of a guy who hasn’t even had one entire good season in (checks page) the minors.

For the record, I think a lot of those guys are probably on the road to bustyland. But it’s way too premature to call Kjerstad a success story.

Last edited 2 years ago by gettwobrute79
sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

Bold is my middle name. Also, those other guys are busts, and he is destroying the minors.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

You know who else destroyed the minors? Tork, Kieboom, Kelenic, Hiura and a bunch of guys who found the ultimate transition to the majors pretty difficult.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

Hiura’s hit tool had red flags all over it. Kieboom was never hitting this well at the upper levels. Torkelson and Kelenic–you got me there; they might still turn around, but it’s not great right now.

But wouldn’t you rather have someone destroying the upper minors than someone who is either physically or metaphorically broken? Behold, the list of players taken after Kjerstad in 2020:
Meyer: Recovering from TJ
Lacy: Walking more than a better per inning in AA.
Martin: Rocking a 29 wRC+ in AAA after rocking an 89 in AA last year
Hancock: Finally striking out more than a batter an inning in his third (!!!) year in AA.
Gonzales: Outperforming his .275 xwOBA
Hassell: 79 wRC+ in AA
Veen: 71 wRC+ in AA
Detmers: Okay, Detmers has been pretty good, although his xERA isn’t as good as his FIP
Crochet: Only 10 innings since 2021, and those 10 innings have not been good
Hendrick: K’ing 34% of the time in A+

Those are the 10 guys taken after Kjerstad. You’re saying, well, Kjerstad could still be a bust. Of course, because the base rate for busts is enormous. But I’m pretty sure the O’s would take him today over any of those guys except maybe Detmers.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

We had this conversation before and again you’re using the benefit of hindsight with those busts, specifically Kieboom and Hiura. Look at their numbers in the minors; no alarming K rates, they raked, good power, etc. We know more now than we knew about prospects five years ago when some of those guys were coming up. And even so, it’s still difficult as hell to figure out who will hit and who won’t.

Of course I’d rather have a guy destroying the minors like Kjerstad is doing. But a year ago he wasn’t destroying anything in the minors. The situation for so many prospects and early graduates is fluid that it sounds like Hot Take Central to call them busts and Kjerstad a stud.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

I was definitely worried about Hiura at the time. He was destroying AA but he was striking out way too much at that level; I know it’s trendy to just write off strikeouts if someone hits for enough power but it’s a huge red flag. I didn’t have any opinion on Kieboom at the time, but his stats in AA and AAA don’t scream “star,” mostly due to lack of power.

I’m not saying that Kjerstad is going to be a star but seriously, who would you have picked in that spot? Everyone panned that pick. And it looks like the Orioles were right. That’s two times they’ve gone against the grain near the top of the draft and both times they were clearly right. It’s uncanny.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Brother, Hiura’s K rate in AA was less than 20%. In fact, only three percentage points higher than Kjesrtad’s. I’m assuming you meant triple A where he was around 26%? Which…ok, but there have been other prospects who have raked at AAA and turned out to be fine as big leaguers.

It’s not uncanny, because you’re trumpeting Kjerstad as a success when he isn’t! Not yet! It’s too early for those kind of proclamations.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

I don’t think I trumpeted him as a success. But I do think he was the best pick in the top 12 of that draft, and the Orioles deserve a ton of credit.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Saying they were clearly right to take him in light of others players struggles when this guy has less than one good season in the minors is pretty much that. Again, too soon for that. Just like it’s a bit too soon to say Holliday is the best player in that draft.

diamonddores
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Austin Martin’s career makes me sad as someone who grew up a Vandy fan. Whether it’s a lack of power, lack of position or lack of health just doesn’t seem to be anything close to “the best hitter in the draft” as I believe Keith Law hyped him to be

wokegraphs
2 years ago
Reply to  diamonddores

Law called Kevin Newman the best hit tool in the draft, too.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
2 years ago
Reply to  wokegraphs

Like Eric said once, Newman has 80 bat control. But 80 bat control and a .301 xWOBACON doesn’t get you much.

Dmjn53
2 years ago

80 bat control is almost a red flag for me, because I immediately stereotype that as a Nick Madrigal/Kevin Newman type

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  diamonddores

There was no 2020 college season to speak of so that whole draft was basically a big dartboard.

There also wasn’t a lot of data available. And I think we are learning to evaluate hit tools a lot better now, with much better data. It was only in 2021 that I started realizing how much information we had about things like contact rate and exit velocity.

Petey BienelMember since 2019
2 years ago

may be a glitch, but #5 on the prospect list (Crews) doesn’t appear, at least on my computer.

Meg RowleyFanGraphs Staff
2 years ago
Reply to  Petey Bienel

As in, you don’t see him on The Board?

theflusher
2 years ago

Soderstrom at 21 and Anthony off the list entirely is wiiiild

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  theflusher

He probably just hasn’t updated those teams yet. That said, there is no way Soderstrom should have been in the Top 100 this offseason. There are some major hit tool problems here and if he has to move to first base he’s in a lot of trouble.

theflusher
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

He said readers should consider this top 100 live and up to date

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’m shocked that a guy who last cracked a 0.3 BB/K in Low-A is getting murked by big-league pitching.

SHOCKED, I say!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

The most charitable interpretation is that he wasn’t ready.

But remember, this guy was scuffling the upper minors already. And didn’t have to be put on the 40-man for something like another 2 years. And the A’s have 0.27 winning percentage so it’s not like they needed him up now. Which makes me wonder what the hell the A’s were thinking. Who is calling the shots there?

The GuruMember since 2026
2 years ago

Skenes will be just a Garret Crochet/just another reliever. Crews will be just another India. Langford swing looks great but he will be positionless in 3 yrs, and the 2 stars of the draft look to be Max Clark and Jenkins the 2 hs guys.

The GuruMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

For my money, based on swing mechanics etc i would have taken Clark 1-1, Jenkins 1-2, Langford 1-3. Wouldn’t have touched the LSU guys that high. The issue with Langford is he will be positionless in 3 years so do you really want to draft a 1B profile in the top 3? I’d say 25 mlb teams would say no, but 5 would say yes. But hey what do i know lol, just watch 200 + games a yr for my entire life.

Last edited 2 years ago by The Guru
JV19
2 years ago

Steve Hajjar is with Cleveland now – Will Benson trade

theflusher
2 years ago

This widespread obsession with Pfaadt is one of the most baffling prospect stories in recent history

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  theflusher

If he’s such a good pitcher…why don’t he pitch good?

darrenasuMember since 2025
2 years ago
Reply to  theflusher

Yeah, good pitchers NEVER struggle their first year in the majors. What a joke! 🤣

theflusher
2 years ago
Reply to  darrenasu

Sits 93. No plus secondaries. Old.

*yawn*

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  darrenasu

Good pitchers tend to have been good above A-Ball.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  theflusher

Good pitch data, and it played in the upper minors. Seems totally reasonable to think he would succeed. He still might, although the early returns are not promising.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

He had a 4.42 FIP in the upper minors, haha!

darrenasuMember since 2025
2 years ago

I’m an insane park/offensive environment. Compared to his peers that year he was in the top 5%. So some research man.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

You know better than to take PCL and Texas League results at face value. And both of those stadiums the D-Backs have in those leagues are offense-friendly even in the context of the league.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

As opposed to notoriously pitcher-friendly Arizona!

But, uh, hey! I’ll take your word for it that the fact that every single stop above A-Ball has kicked the fucking shit out of him has been down to bad luck.

Who am I to bet against a 5th round talent???

wokegraphs
2 years ago

Looks like the Bucs have the highest ranked system until Endy and Davis graduate.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  wokegraphs

They’re gonna lose a lot of their list. Those two plus Priester, Triolo, Hernandez, Gonzales. They’re going to drop out of the top 5, maybe the top 10 with the graduates. Of course, what really matters is if they transition into good big leaguers.

wokegraphs
2 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

For sure, lots of grads but that’s what you want, I guess. Termarr and Skenes and Solometo, Jones, Harrington, Chandler and Shim will keep their system interesting for at least another year. If they’re somehow able to get Daniel Cuvet signed for their remaining $1.2M or whatever, I really like him as a future top 100.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  wokegraphs

I think they’ll certainly have an interesting group next year. Oddly enough, their system strength is depth, and they’re lacking the stars. They may have them in Skenes and T (who has been lighting up low A with a dozen homers since June).

ganggreen23
2 years ago

Which writer completed the Oakland A’s updated top 28 Prospects list ?

They left off RHP Jack Perkins and OF Colby Thomas, whom have both performed well and been promoted recently. They deserve to be on the list, especially over some of the non-performers who are still on the List ( Clark Elliott and Brayan Buelvas ).

Also, I think Kyle Muller has exhausted his Rookie eligibility ( he is still being Listed as a Prospect on this List ).

https://www.fangraphs.com/prospects/the-board?sortcol=1&sortdir=asc&org=oak

Last edited 2 years ago by ganggreen23
synco
2 years ago
Reply to  ganggreen23

Some of the ETAs on that list seem screwy. Luis Morales isn’t going to debut until 2029?

Last edited 2 years ago by synco
3cardmontyMember since 2025
2 years ago

Luis Castillo trade looking pretty good for Seattle about now…