Is Nick Swisher Done?

Nick Swisher is, in a word, divisive. His larger-than-Brohio personality tends to overshadow his abilities on the field. Put another way: almost everybody has an opinion on Swisher, few of which are based solely on his playing ability.

After you post a .208/.278/.331 line with 8 home runs in just over 400 plate appearances, perhaps you want more folks focused on your broisterous off-field brosona than an injury-plagued disappointment.

If the rumors drifting out of the GM meetings are to believed, Cleveland isn’t swayed by their popular player’s personality, instead focusing on what it might take to be rid of the remaining two years and $30 million (plus a $14 million vesting option for 2017) left on the contract he signed in ahead of the 2013 season. Ken Rosenthal intimates that Cleveland would like to free themselves of Swisher’s deal, perhaps taking a different bad contract coming back the other way.

Is there any daring or deep-pocketed team out there willing to roll the dice with Swisher’s age-34 and 35 seasons? Is $30 million of their precious payroll worth the gamble that Swisher returns to his previous levels of production?

The single biggest hurdle between Swisher and productivity in 2015 is health. His season ended in August as both his knees gave him trouble all season long, a problem he first observed towards the end of Spring Training. In the end, he required “debridements” in both his knees, cleaning up all manner of mess and scar tissue. How much did Swisher’s physical issues contribute to the worst season of his career?

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

It’s easy to dismiss everything as a product of a weakened lower half, but a rough 2014 together with his 2013 season suggests a player in decline. just not as steep as he fell off last year. The uptick in strikeouts — and subsequent drop in walk rate — is the ledge upon which his entire bounce-back teeters.

Swisher’s increasing whiff rate as the year went on, coupled with the increase in breaking balls thrown his way, is a matter of perspective. A sympathetic soul might chalk all his struggles up to injury. A weakened base slowed his bat, causing him to cheat on the fastball and leaving him exposed to the larger doses of breaking balls. If he’s healthy and able to produce more rotation with his lower half, suddenly he has a quicker bat and voila! Swisher’s fixed! He did chase more in 2014, a fact the optimists among us happily brush under the injury rug.

On top of more strikeouts, fewer walks, and more chases, Swisher managed to hit more pop-ups and generally made worse contact as the year wore on and his knees wore down. Suddenly there is a mounting pile of evidence suggesting this hitter just isn’t that great anymore. Any expected regression gets held down by the weight of rapidly deteriorating skills.

A rising strikeout rate for a player in his thirties isn’t a death sentence on its own. Strong hitters like Josh Willingham and Carlo Beltran started striking out more in their mid-thirties while still producing at similar levels to their prime. Beltran makes for a noteworthy comparison because he, like Swisher, is a switch-hitter. Beltran and Swisher posted surprisingly similar numbers through their respective peaks (126 wRC+ for Beltran compared to 121 wRC+ for Swisher over 5000 PAs between their age-25 and 32 seasons.)

After Beltran’s 2011 strikeout rate increased by the same magnitude as Swisher’s year-over-year (between five and six percent), it slipped back to its previous levels, though his walk rate plummeted and is yet to fully recover. Like Swisher, his whiff rate increased as did his willingness to chase out of the zone. Beltran reversed the trend slightly the following season but he’s clearly a different, and significantly worse, hitter now.

The inability to separate injury from decline is the greatest roadblock to any Swisher trade. Even if Cleveland kicks in some money to lubricate the proceedings, there are only so many medical reports one can pore over before acknowledging the risk of such a gamble. An expensive gamble on a player who isn’t likely to offer much in the way of defensive value. Barring a return to the outfield, that is. Another largely health dependant factor, like everything so far.

As Mike Petriello noted earlier this month, no team needs an upgrade at DH more than the one that already employs Swisher: the Cleveland Indians. No team can better assess his health,  working closely with the training staff to build a rehab plan as he did. No team is better positioned to make an informed decision as to his ability to contribute in 2015 and beyond.

The reality of Major League baseball is such that Cleveland might choose to part ways with Swisher for economic reasons that supersede the baseball forces at play. If Swisher can put together two seasons similar to Beltran’s 2012/13 seasons (5 WAR), $30 million is more than a fair price. The vesting option — requiring 550 plate appearances in 2016 and a passed physical — complicates matters further if you believe his struggles are all health related. If he’s healthy and good, suddenly the math changes and it’s $44 million you inherit.

The odds are stacked against him and Steamer seems him as barely above-average at the plate (105 wRC+) but he remains a decent bounce-back candidate for any opportunistic team. There’s a good hitter and good teammate lurking in there somewhere, two healthy knees are all it should take to break him free.





Drew used to write about baseball and other things at theScore but now he writes here. Follow him on twitter @DrewGROF

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter
11 years ago

I think “broisterous” might just be my new favorite word

Middaughsome
11 years ago

Just when you think Swisher is done…Puke and Rally!

southie
11 years ago

The better question. Who cares?

Matt
11 years ago
Reply to  southie

Why’d you read the article then?

Smurf
11 years ago
Reply to  southie

That’s not really a better question, just lazier.

Plucky
11 years ago
Reply to  southie

Indians cannot be written off next year as a contender for the central. What contenders do with their starters is more or less inherently newsworthy, especially when it’s November and there’s nothing else to talk about

Nate
11 years ago

Swisher to Phillies for Marlon Byrd, Ryan Howard, and $40 milllion.

Ruben Amaro
11 years ago
Reply to  Nate

You expect me to trade 48 HR, 180 RBI, and $40 million for 8 HR and 42 RBI? Yeah, right. I’m not that dumb. Maybe take out Ryan Howard and then have the Indians add in that young, unproven pitcher Corey Kluber. Then we might have a deal.

Eric
11 years ago

Beltran and Swisher were never comparable, regardless of wRC. I am sorry but that is a very bad comparison. Beltran was and always will be better than Nick Swisher by a landslide. Every offensive category Beltran is better than Swisher between the ages of 25-32.

Tom Ivy
11 years ago
Reply to  Eric
Eric
11 years ago
Reply to  Tom Ivy

Beltran, better in doubles, HRs, Runs, RBI, batting average, OBP, SLG, OPS, stolen bases, hits, total bases. 8 years for Beltran from ages 25 to 32, 100 runs and RBI each as a average!!, Swisher not even close during that time frame. Beltran has less strikeouts, more walks for a way better contact rate and K/BB rate. Nothing that Beltran did or does could EVER be eclipsed by Nick Swisher, nothing. We are talking Beltran has a few gold gloves and all start teams, and Swisher has never had a gold glove and was only 1 time an all star. Beltran will be up for serious consideration as a HOFer when all is said and done, Nick Swisher won’t even get a vote or a thought. Not even close! one stat…wOBA and you actually think its the end all be all value? yuck compare on baseball reference, don’t take my word for it.

TMWISH
11 years ago
Reply to  Eric

You are using a whole lot of context dependent stats. wOBA trys to take the contact out of it

bookbook
11 years ago

Beltran is clearly, and always has been, a better player than Swisher. That doesn’t mean they haven’t been comparable offensive performers. For some reason, in my mind John Kruk is the comparison. He substantially outperformed Swisher over the last two comparable-age seasons, but retired anyway…

Phantom Stranger
11 years ago

The Braves will take him for BJ Upton. Cleveland, call John Hart.

stonepie
11 years ago

swisher for ubaldo if cruz leaves baltimore

Eric
11 years ago
Reply to  stonepie

You’d be lucky to get a box of rocks for Ubaldo. Why the Orioles signed him I have no idea. He has no clue where the ball goes once it leaves his hand. That arm slot, those mechanics, and follow through are all terrible, it needs to be completely overhauled, no consistency from him.

Johnny Ringo
11 years ago

Would love to see Edwin Jackson for Swisher, because I think Swisher would do far less damage on the Cubs bench, or being injured, than Jackson does while on the mound. But, I doubt the Indians will be a taker for this unless the Cubs throw something in.

Hindsight 20/20
11 years ago

And before the 2013 season Dave wanted the Mariners to sign him for 7/100… I’m sure Jack Z is glad he’s not sitting on the last 5 years of that one.

Sabean Wannabe
11 years ago

As a Giants fan I’ve been wondering if a Lincecum for Swisher swap makes sense. Lincecum has 1yr/$18M for 2015. Giants fill left field and save $3M for 2015 (if no $$ is involved in deal). It leaves them on the hook for 2016 but with Hudson and Scutaro off the books after 2015 maybe they could swing it.

Both teams would be hoping for bounce back seasons of course. Giants would have to make sure Swisher’s option doesn’t vest. It would also remove temptation for Giants to put Lincecum in the rotation in 2015.

Even if its on the Giants radar they would have to wait until Sandoval/Tomas situation plays out as Tomas might play LF.

Joshua
11 years ago

Feel sorry for him. It is amazing in baseball:if you hurt your hands, wrist or your base you’re done for that year. Love swishalicious. Hope he can bounce back.