Jacob deGrom’s Remarkable Run
Wednesday evening in Flushing, Jacob deGrom put a bow on another superlative season. For seven innings, he flummoxed the Marlins, striking out seven while only allowing two hits. It wasn’t surprising, exactly — deGrom is one of the best few pitchers in baseball and the Marlins are, well, the Marlins. For once, the Mets provided deGrom with copious run support — the three they scored in the first would have been enough, but they added six more runs over the next two innings.
With 32 starts in the books, deGrom looks to have handily lapped the field in the Cy Young race. If FIP-based WAR is your preferred metric, he ranks second in the majors, behind only Gerrit Cole and half a win clear of Max Scherzer. By RA9-WAR, he’s also second in the majors, this time behind Justin Verlander, and miles ahead of NL runner up Jack Flaherty.
Craig Edwards published a Cy Young tracker last week if you’d prefer to dig even deeper into the minutiae, but deGrom was already in the lead, and his two most recent starts (14 innings, 16 strikeouts, one walk, and no runs) only widened the gap. There probably won’t be much surprise come awards season.
But while there isn’t much suspense when it comes to ranking deGrom’s preeminence in the National League this year, his two-year run has vaulted him into select historical territory. His ERA-, which controls for scoring environment, works out to 51 over the last two years, which means he allows about half as many runs as a league average pitcher.
That 51 ERA-, ludicrous as it is, can’t compete with the best seasons of all time — Pedro Martinez’s preposterous 2000 worked out to a 35 ERA- (1.74 ERA in Fenway in the heart of the steroids era, goodness gracious), and there have been 42 qualifying seasons with an ERA- of 50 or lower since 1901. Even if we limit ourselves to 1949 and beyond, there have been 24 of those seasons. There are plenty of Hall of Famers on the list, but also Kevin Brown, Dean Chance, and Trevor Bauer.
But looking at that list obscures what’s been so great about deGrom’s recent run. He didn’t just happen into one tremendous season. He did it twice, and twice in a row, which increases the degree of difficulty exponentially. I’m not saying it’s easy to post an ERA- of 50 — after all, almost no one has done it — but it’s a lot easier to do for one season than for two. ERA itself is prone to extreme results, which is a huge help.
For example, the average ERA- of the 24 pitcher-seasons that we’re looking at is 45. That’s not surprising — it’s good to be good! Their peripheral stats, however, aren’t quite as overwhelming. Their FIP-, for example, averages 58, and FIP is a more regressed, more stable statistic. For what it’s worth, deGrom’s two-year FIP- is 55, more or less in line with these great seasons.
But even looking at more stable indicators undersells deGrom’s run. What’s really impressive isn’t that his underlying metrics have been better than you’d think; it’s that he’s done it for two years in a row. And this recent stretch isn’t just two good seasons in a row; it’s quite literally one of the best two-season runs of all time.
Here are the 10 best two-season ERA- marks since 1949:
| Season | Name | ERA- | Cy Young Awards |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994-1995 | Greg Maddux | 38 | 2 |
| 1999-2000 | Pedro Martinez | 38 | 2 |
| 1993-1994 | Greg Maddux | 48 | 2 |
| 2002-2003 | Pedro Martinez | 49 | 0 |
| 1968-1969 | Bob Gibson | 50 | 1 |
| 1997-1998 | Roger Clemens | 51 | 2 |
| 2013-2014 | Clayton Kershaw | 51 | 2 |
| 2018-2019 | Jacob deGrom | 51 | 1* |
| 1998-1999 | Pedro Martinez | 52 | 1 |
| 1995-1996 | Greg Maddux | 52 | 1 |
Right away, that’s remarkable company. Leaving deGrom out of it, everyone else is in the Hall of Fame, a future Hall of Famer, or Roger Clemens. You’d have to go all the way down to number 19, Kevin Brown’s 1996-1997 seasons, to find someone whose career wasn’t Hall of Fame caliber (and it’s a near thing — Kevin Brown is better than you think). Pitchers can’t be this good by accident.
The list doesn’t get any less impressive if you prefer FIP as your indicator of excellence:
| Season | Name | FIP- | Cy Young Awards |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999-2000 | Pedro Martinez | 40 | 2 |
| 2000-2001 | Randy Johnson | 50 | 2 |
| 2014-2015 | Clayton Kershaw | 51 | 1 |
| 2002-2003 | Pedro Martinez | 53 | 0 |
| 1994-1995 | Greg Maddux | 53 | 2 |
| 1984-1985 | Dwight Gooden | 54 | 1 |
| 2001-2002 | Randy Johnson | 54 | 2 |
| 1997-1998 | Roger Clemens | 54 | 2 |
| 1994-1995 | Randy Johnson | 55 | 1 |
| 2018-2019 | Jacob deGrom | 55 | 1* |
Aside from the fact that Pedro’s 2002-2003 seasons were tremendous despite a lack of award recognition, these lists basically say the same thing. When you think of modern pitching legends, Jacob deGrom belongs.
One thing that this list made me wonder is whether deGrom’s recent form could lead to a Hall of Fame push. He’s already 31, which sounds shocking offhand, but it makes more sense when you realize that he didn’t debut in the majors until his age 26 season. That’s a problem — deGrom’s 31.5 fWAR by age 31 is only 97th in the post-integration era, and you don’t have to look any further than number 96, Erik Hanson, to see that his pace is nothing special.
That doesn’t mean he has no shot, though. The easiest way to look at Hall of Fame standards is to look at our own Jay Jaffe’s JAWS score, and though that shows deGrom far behind, it gives a realistic idea of what he’d have to do to reach Hall status. The average seven-year peak for starting pitchers is 49.9 bWAR, and deGrom is at 34.9 despite only pitching in the majors for six seasons. He also has room to improve on some of his early seasons — if he can average 6 bWAR for the next three years, no easy feat, that would get him to a 46.3 bWAR peak.
Of course, a 31 year old pitcher who has already had Tommy John surgery once being one of the best pitchers in baseball for the next three years is far from a given. ZiPS projected him to be worth 4.9 and 4.4 seasons in 2020 and 2021, respectively, before the start of the season, and though it has surely bumped him up slightly in the wake of another superlative campaign, 6 WAR projections don’t exactly grow on trees.
That doesn’t even cover the career WAR portion of JAWS, which deGrom has absolutely no shot at matching. His late start is too hard to overcome; he’d need to average more than 6 WAR a season for the next six years to hit that benchmark, and projecting more future WAR than he has accrued in his entire career go date is a bridge too far even for me. Starting pitching standards are changing, but deGrom looks like a long shot for the Hall either way.
Still, even if the last two years aren’t the start of deGrom’s Hall campaign, they’re a remarkable feat of latter-day pitching. When people talk about the absolute best runs by starters, they talk about peak Gibson, or peak Kershaw, or the absurd 1990’s heroics of Martinez, Clemens, Maddux, and Johnson. They talk about Sandy Koufax, who didn’t quite have the ERA- of the leaders but also frequently threw 300 innings in a season.
Those seasons, those pitchers, are all great. In 2018 and 2019, Jacob deGrom has joined that pantheon. A 2.05 ERA, 2.32 FIP, and 26.5% K-BB sound like video game numbers, and he’s doing that in a two-year stretch that will be remembered for its extreme offense. Maybe the Hall of Fame isn’t in deGrom’s future, but the present is absolutely legendary. We’ve been watching history these past two years, even if the Mets haven’t taken full advantage of it.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
Hi, great read, but just a heads-up: in the “Best 2-Season ERA- Marks” table, Maddux’s 94-95 run is listed twice with two different ERA- numbers (38 and 48).
Sorry, transcription error, the second should be 93-94. I’ve edited to reflect that.
what I think is remarkable about deGrom this season. He had 3 bad starts where he gave up 17 runs in 13 innings- all 3 of them by May 17. From May 18 on, he had a 8-3 record with a 1.89 ERA. His season was very similar to Corey Kluber’s 2 years ago in that regard(with no injury).
I’d be more interested to learn how he steadily increases his velocity every year.
It may be slowly ticking up since the ulnar transposition surgery in 2016. Also, they changed the way pitch speed is measured in the past couple of years, resulting in slightly higher readings across the board. Also, he cut his hair, saying he had research showing that it would add 2mph to his fastball. Also, he is very possibly throwing harder just to spite you.
Or it’s PEDs.
OK. I was curious whether you would actually come out and say that, as opposed to just suggesting it. Now I know how much attention to pay to anything that I ever see from you in the future.
Oh great another naive fan who thinks the league is clean.
Was it the 180 lbs filling out his 6’4″ frame that gave it away?
If you accept the aerodynamic differences of the new baseballs as an explanation for uptick in home runs, then surely you can see that it would make 4-seam fastballs a touch faster, yeah?
No I wouldn’t accept that 4 seam fastballs would be faster because of the ball, that’s actually terrible logic. The aerodynamics of the new ball only affect flight distance, not exit velocity. They carry farther because of the more perfect core, but aren’t released any faster. Velocity is measured straight from a pitcher’s hand or right off the bat. A more aerodynamic ball with a more perfect core wouldn’t affect release speed of a pitch.
Your notion of naivety is not believing conjectural assertions made with zero evidence. Where I come from, that’s called reason.
I didn’t make any assertion. It was a proposition. Where you come from do they teach you the difference between the two?
I don’t understand fans who can’t enjoy any good player performances without just assuming that they’re taking PEDs. Like, even if he fails a test at some point in the future, who cares?? There’s NOTHING linking him to PEDs right now, just enjoy this historic performance that’s happening in front of our eyes.
Have you heard of the kinetic chain?
Baseball with PEDs is fun. Don’t be the no fun police.
If deGrom stacked more CY Young awards, that would elevate his Hall case (obviously). 3 or 4 Cy Young awards (where he was the best pitcher in the league) may stand out to voters who are grappling with new SP standards 10-15 years from now.
any hope for him is going to be tied in avoiding seasons like what Corey Kluber had this season with only 7 starts. They are kind of similar cases.. de Grom is 2 years younger than Kluber- but has 32 fewer wins(98 to 66). They both will have 2 Cy Youngs.
Long-term, I wonder if the injury this year is a positive for Kluber. He pitched a lot of innings between 2014-2018 and at times seemed worn out. Basically taking the whole season off for an injury to his non-pitching arm might rejuvenate him.
yeah we’ll see about what you’re saying- very reasonable. However for the purpose of getting into the HOF, this year was probably a killer- even if he got another Cy Young. When you enter the party as late as Kluber and deGrom have- Kluber 1st full season at 27, de Grom at 26- you are always on an uphill battle.
Absolutely agree. The best “comp” would probably be Randy Johnson, who had his first really big season at age 29 and then missed most of his age 32 season. There’s also Curt Schilling who got 60+ WAR from age 30 onwards. But those are the exceptions. And of course they also had advantages in terms of IP and counting stats.
true. Wow RJ’s career was something else. 86-40 from 36-40 with a 2.69 ERA- 173 ERA+. 1468 K’s.
I tend to think the Koufax peak is kind of the demarcation line, as it were. From 1961-66 he threw 1,632 innings with an 63 ERA-/66 FIP- accumulating 46.4 of his 53.1 career bWAR with three Cy Youngs, two rings & an MVP.
Of course, deGrom isn’t going to rack up any 300 IP seasons, but so far, through six seasons he is at 1,101 IP with a 68 ERA-/69 FIP-, good for 32.8 bWAR.
Scherzer, from age 32-34 has put up 593 IP of 61 ERA-/62 FIP-, good for 21.7 bWAR.
Verlander, from age 32-36 has put up 998 IP of 69 ERA-/78 FIP-, good for 29.8 bWAR.
Halladay, from age 32-34 threw 723 IP of 61 ERA-/67 FIP-, good for 24.3 bWAR.
Another guy that got a later start to being elite, Cliff Lee, went 666 IP of 73 ERA-/73 FIP-, good for 19.6 bWAR from age 32-34.
Obviously it’s incredibly rare for pitchers to maintain elite status through their early to mid 30s & beyond, but if anyone can do it deGrom seems like a pretty good candidate.
At the very least, for a more recent peak comparison guy, deGrom will probably need to surpass the 1,779 innings of 69 ERA-/78 FIP- that Johan put up during his peak from 2002-10, which came in at 50.4 bWAR & hasn’t gotten him much traction to this point.
If he can pull off an incredible run from age 32 on like any of the guys above or even something like Greinke, 777 innings of 77 ERA-/84 FIP- good for 17.9 bWAR from age 32-35, he should be at least within shouting distance.
I actually disagree on the HOF point. It’s a big if, but I expect deGrom to be very successful over the next two or three seasons. If he winds up winning three Cy Youngs in a four or five year span, I think it will become very difficult to keep him out if he gets to around 50 career WAR, especially given the fact that we will likely be looking at starting pitchers through a different career WAR prism by the time he’s up for election.
I don’t see how two Cy Youngs isn’t HOF. Anyone can fluke into one (I guess) but two should be automatic.
Should tim lincecum be HOF then?
Making it to the hall based on JAWS looks like an extreme uphill climb, but not all Hall voters base their decisions on it, and, for better or for worse, deGrom may have a better shot on “traditional” metrics, namely those shiny Cy Youngs. With the exception of Clemens for obvious reasons, no pitcher who has won three Cy Youngs has missed the Hall, and especially with it looking like he has it locked down this year, a third is not out of the question at his age.
Santana would probably be the counter-argument against those being weighted that heavily, his early fall off of the ballot was rather absurd, but going back-to-back certainly punctuates one’s peak (seven years for JAWS is just a number chosen for the metric and not an objective gold standard), and if he can take a third without completely flaming out after, I think he could be Cooperstown-bound.
Kevin Brown is a HOFer in my book (based purely on stats). His peak was incredible.
Brown is one of those dudes who is eminently qualified by the numbers, but just gets crushed on narrative. It’s too bad, because he was an absolutely fantastic pitcher.
He is a PED guy I think.
I love that Pedro and Maddux are on the era- list 3 times each. I get FIP but think the faults of it are shown in that Maddux never had elite FIPs but results do count. FIP is a better predictor than a review of the events that actually happened. Love the article though and deGrom is pretty great and in good company.
As incredible as a 2.07 ERA in 2000 would have been, Pedro’s ERA in 2000 was actually 1.74… 2.07 was from 1999.
Oof my bad. Fixed. That 1999 line is maybe even more ridiculous!
Seems like the article should have been about Maddux’s 3-year run…
It could have been about Max Scherzer too. The greatest pitcher of the past X years goes unappreciated. Personally, I think Max deserved the Cy last year and I think you could give it to him this year… then there are the years that he actually won it.
Scherzer led DeGrom coming into September in WAR. Can a player on a non-playoff team really lap a player preparing for a playoff run in September? Does Scherzer’s post-injury pre-playoff run really set him back that far, because it was way ahead when they were both healthy. You should think about what WAR is – it feeds off of IP and Scherzer missed a month. This really isn’t as clear-cut as you would like it to be. Scherzer leads in FIP and xFIP – why get carried away with the arbitrary metrics? Scherzer even leads in ERA- this year. I’m not saying that DeGrom isn’t on a HOF trajectory but there really is no historic dominance to what he is doing. I’ll take Scherzer over the past two years as I think K-BB is better than whatever feeds the other metrics. IMO we are celebrating the faults of some pretty flawed metrics as opposed to the underlying players. What gets lost in this aggregate analysis is context. Scherzer had an amazing (far superior to DeGrom) season up until he got injured – its a shame that we are not talking about that. I get that reality happened and it cost Max the Cy Young but man is he getting sold short for what he did the majority of this season. Go ahead – look at those splits. That would be an insightful article and a service to the baseball community to celebrate the greatness that is right in front of us. The value of in depth analysis is not in pointing out the obvious but the less obvious, such as Max Scherzer’s season up until injury. I worry that his best days may finally be behind him and most of us missed it.
being out there though means something…. Scherzer had only 172.1 innings this year. OK he gets a lot of the Cy Youngs of the half season. But that’s kind of like the September Heisman trophies. You have to take into account the entire season…. Yes, Scherzer was increcible the 1st half. But that’s not what the award is for. It’s for the entire season. And you can’t look at the final numbers and say that Scherzer was better than deGrom this year. You can say that he should have been with things like FIP. But that’s not reality. Awards aren’t a what if proposition. They are what actually did happen for the ENTIRE season.
Also, Scherzer does not lead deGrom in ERA-. 59 to 65 for deGrom.
Scherzer frankly will be lucky to finish in the top 3 of the voting this year. I think we’re going to find a lot of ballots as
1- deGrom 11-8 2.43 ERA 204 IP
2- Ryu 14-5 2.32 ERA 182.2 IP
3- Flaherty 11-8 2.75 ERA 196.1 IP
Scherzer 11-8 2.92 ERA 172.1 IP