Jaime Garcia Pitching to Contact with Ace Stuff

Pitching to contact is a much-maligned, sometimes misunderstood philosophy. Inducing contact results in a hit 30% of the time while a runner can reach base on a strikeout only on the rare wild pitch or passed ball. The strikeout is a considerably better outcome, but attacking hitters and getting strike one, the philosophy espoused by Dave Duncan, can combine strikeouts, weak contact, and quick outs to form an incredibly effective pitcher. A half-decade after Duncan’s retirement, one of his former pupils, Jaime Garcia, is throwing strikes, getting ground balls, and keeping hitters off balance, potentially resurrecting a career that appeared doomed by injuries.

Garcia, a 22nd-round draft pick of the Cardinals in 2005, made a brief appearance in the majors in 2008 before Tommy John surgery ended that season and cost him 2009 as well. Garcia came back strong in 2010, and in July 2011, he signed a four-year contract extension that included two team options. At the time, he had pitched nearly 300 innings with a 3.06 ERA and 3.46 FIP, but a year later he would suffer another injury, this time in his shoulder. Rehabilitation failed and in early 2013, he underwent surgery, missing the rest of the season and putting his career in doubt. He was not a part of the Cardinals’ plan to pitch in 2014, but he recovered and appeared briefly in 2014 before injuries again took over. This time, Garcia suffered from thoracic outlet syndrome, the same condition ended the career of teammate Chris Carpenter. Again, he had surgery, and again, he was not a part of the Cardinals’ plans.

Garcia almost made the starting rotation out of spring training, but injury setbacks sent Garcia to the disabled list to start the season. Adam Wainwright’s injury cleared the way for a rotation slot should Garcia recover, and he made his season debut on May 21. He pitched well, making seven starts with a 1.69 ERA and 3.06 FIP before making yet another appearance on the disabled list due to a groin injury. Garcia, missed a month and then picked up right where he left off. For the season, Garcia has made 13 starts, pitched 86.2 innings with an average 19% strikeout rate, a good 6.1% walk rate, a fortunate .235 BABIP that has helped lead to a 1.77 ERA, but good enough peripherals for a 3.03 FIP, 19th out of the 136 MLB pitchers with at least 80 innings. He has been remarkably consistent, having a single-game FIP above four in just two starts, pitching a quality start in all but one, and giving up one or zero earned runs in eight of his last eleven starts.

A look at Garcia’s innings totals and his stints on the disabled list will tell you that Garcia is not to be counted on for an extended period. The Cardinals and Garcia have been given a gift with his relative good health this year, and Garcia has taken advantage using five above-average pitches in the strike zone: four-seam fastball, two-seam fastball, slider, change, and curve. From Brooks Baseball:

Jaime Garcia Pitch Mix in 2015
Frequency Whiff GB/BIP
Four-Seam 24% 4% 63%
Two-Seam 36% 4% 66%
Slider 19% 17% 69%
Change 14% 17% 64%
Curve 7% 11% 67%
SOURCE: Brooks Baseball

Eno Sarris recently spoke with Taylor Jungmann about the diminishing marginal utility of pitches, and their usage affecting effectiveness, especially as it relates to using Jungmann’s sinker.

“What makes the sinker better is that I don’t throw it as much,” Jungmann told me before a game against San Francisco. “It makes it that much more effective because they aren’t looking for it. If I threw it every single pitch, my four-seamer would be better.”

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

Garcia relies on the sinking, two-seam fastball, but mixes in three other pitches with regularity as well as the occasional curve. Any one pitch of Garcia might not be a world-beater, the excellent sinker not withstanding, but Garcia has five pitches that he throws well, keeping a hitter off balance and increasing their effectiveness. If a hitter comes up three times against Garcia and sees an average of four pitches in each plate appearance, Garcia’s pitch mix indicates the hitter will see four two-seamers, three four-seamers, two sliders, two changes, and one curve. The four-seamer and two-seamer are slightly below-average for whiffs with the curve average and the slider and change both above-average. Combining the whiff rates with Garcia’s elite ground-ball tendencies, gives Garcia one of the very best arsenals in baseball, even before this season.

In his last home start against the Giants, Kelby Tomlinson led off the game. Garcia threw a low four-seam fastball, just off the plate on the inside that was called a ball. Garcia followed with a called strike on a four-seamer on the lower half of the outside corner. Then Garcia went with the a two-seamer on the inside corner in the upper half of the zone for another strike. Garcia then froze Tomlinson with this slider on the outside corner.

Matt Duffy watched the Tomlinson at-bat from the on-deck circle. Garcia started Duffy with a four-seamer right down the middle. Then he introduced the change, throwing one in the dirt and one high and away. Then a sinker high and away followed by another four-seamer down the middle to make the count full. Up to this point, Garcia had used four different types of pitches among his nine to the Giants — five for strikes without inducing a single swing. On the 3-2 count, Garcia went back to the change, this time right in the heart of the plate.

Garcia would end the first inning on a first-pitch groundout from Brandon Belt on a sinker right down the middle. Garcia finished that inning on just 11 pitches, a theme for him on the season. Garcia is averaging 6.2 innings pitched per start, 13th among pitchers with at least 80 innings pitched. Of the 12 pitchers ahead of Garcia, every one of them averages more than 100 pitches per start, while Garcia is averaging just 92 pitches to get through nearly seven innings. Only 19 pitchers average less than 15 pitches per innings with most players on that list among the best in baseball, and just two are under 14 pitches per inning. Garcia’s 13.8 pitches per inning is first in the majors, just ahead of Mark Buehrle.

Garcia is pitching aggressively in the zone, but he is not on the extremes. His zone percentage is 51%, in the top fifth of pitchers but not among the extremes of Bartolo Colon or Max Scherzer. His 83% contact percentage is in the top third, but he’s not Mark Buerhle or Phil Hughes. Where Garcia is elite is in getting ground balls. His 65% ground ball rate is second among pitchers with at least 80 innings, just behind Brett Anderson and ahead of Dallas Keuchel and Tyson Ross, the only other pitchers above 60% on the season. As a result of these tendencies, as well as his ability to field his position, Garcia has more assists per nine innings (2.3) than any other pitcher in baseball. Garcia’s profile does not exactly match that of the other extreme ground-ball pitchers, who pitch predominately low in the strike zone, extending their pitches off the outside corner to right-handers.

Compare the following heat maps from Baseball Savant.

First, Brett Anderson:

Anderson_heatmap

Tyson Ross:

Ross_heatmap

Dallas Keuchel:

Keuchel_heatmap

All three have a big swatch of pitches low and off the zone, where hitters are more likely to hit a ground ball. Keuchel pounds the lower the half of the zone. Compare the above heat maps with Garcia’s:

Garcia_heatmap

Garcia uses the entirety of the strike zone with very little outside of it. He can use his four-seam and two-seam fastball in the middle of the zone because hitters are not ready for the four-seam and the two-seam generates so much movement it is difficult to square up. On the first pitch of a plate appearance, Garcia splits his two fastballs pretty evenly 75% of the time, but the two-seam differs in horizontal movement by more than four inches, per Brooks Baseball. With two strikes, he goes to his slider 40% of the time, but uses his other four pitches at least 9% each, keeping hitters off balance.

Taken together, Garcia’s pitches have been extremely effective this season. Using the FanGraphs pitch values alone to determine the effectiveness of a pitch can be misleading, as different pitches interact with each other, potentially helping or hurting their value. For example: a pitcher could have a great slider, but with a poor fastball could cause hitters to lay off the slider and give it a low value. Conversely, a pitcher could have a great change and the fastball could appear to be better than it is due to hitters worried about the change. For Garcia, we can examine all of Garcia’s pitches, not to show how great each one is individually, but to show how good the collection of pitches has been this season.

The chart below shows the raw pitch value and Garcia’s MLB rank among the 140 pitchers with at least 80 innings pitched. The next two columns turn the value into a rate stat, per 100 pitches, and show Garcia’s rank among pitchers who throw each pitch at least 10% of the time (5% for the curve).

Jaime Garcia Pitch Values in 2015
RAA Rank RAA/100 Pitches Rank
Four-Seam 7.0 20th 2.86 1st
Two-Seam 7.4 11th 1.92 3rd
Slider 3.5 27th 1.64 15th
Change 3.6 25th 2.10 6th
Curve 2.0 27th 2.48 6th

Despite the innings gap with most of the pitchers, Garcia ranks in the top 20% for all five pitches. Turning the pitch into a rate stat, Garcia ranks first for the four-seam fastball, third for the two-seam fastball behind only Sonny Gray and Johnny Cueto, sixth for the curve and change and 15th for the slider. Of the 14 pitchers who rank ahead of Garcia on the slider, only Zack Greinke also has a good (greater than 1.0/100) four-seam fastball and only Sonny Gray and Dallas Keuchel also have a good two-seamer. None of the 14 pitchers are well above average with all three pitches. Adding in the good change and curve and it is easy to see how Garcia has gotten good results.

Clearly, Garcia’s 1.77 ERA is not likely to remain so low. His .235 BABIP and 83% left-on-base percentage are due for some regression. Garcia, like the rest of the Cardinals’ pitchers this season, has increased his strikeout rate and lowered his BABIP with runners on base. While the increased strikeout rate might provide some indication that the Cardinals pitch differently with runners on as the league as a whole gets worse in those situations, and the Cardinals’ solid defense might be more likely to get outs in general and turn a double play (Garcia has faced 114 batters with runners on base, and turned those plate appearances into an astonishing 107 outs), the BABIP is still unsustainable and double plays are far from guaranteed. As more hits fall, the ERA is due for a rise, but the FIP, the quality and depth of his pitches, and the ground-ball rate indicate Garcia should still be a very good pitcher moving forward if he can stay healthy, the always present disclaimer for the 29-year-old lefty.

The two team options the Cardinals hold on Garcia looked once like an afterthought, but if Garcia is healthy at the end of the season, the $11.5 million option for next season looks like a no-brainer. That is a big if given his track record, but Garcia embodies the Dave Duncan aggressive, strike-zone oriented philosophy that continues in St. Louis even after Dave Duncan passed the torch to current Cardinals pitching coach Derek Lilliquist. Given three major surgeries and multiple seasons lost to the disabled list, Garcia should not be pitching this well, but for as long as his body will allow, he has a good shot at shutting down opposing hitters every time out.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
First
11 years ago

Another Craig Edwards Cardinal puff piece.

BigDaddyCool
11 years ago
Reply to  First

yep

bdhudson
11 years ago
Reply to  First

Boy has this joke gotten old.

Wrigley Ready
11 years ago

“Garcia, like the rest of the Cardinals’ pitchers this season, has increased his strikeout rate and lowered his BABIP with runners on base”

But what you really meant to say was

“Garcia, like the rest of the Cardinals’ pitchers this season, has increased his strikeout rate and has gotten historically lucky with runners on base”

Cmart's cups
11 years ago
Reply to  Wrigley Ready

Hey Wrigley Ready – in case you’re interested (I’m sure you aren’t), the Cardinals are still outplaying the Pirates and Cubs by BaseRuns, or by any other measure you’d like to go by.

Just thought you’d like to know.

Only Glove, No Love
11 years ago
Reply to  Cmart's cups

Cardinals = years and years and years of CLUSTER LUCK.

Just like the DBacks will win despite of the utter insanity and consistently laughable bad process of TLR and Company.

I mean Billy Beane doesn’t do it that way after all.

Cmart's cups
11 years ago

Unfortunately, people think that way. Yes, the Cardinals have gotten lucky some times like a lot of other teams do from time to time, but they have had consistently good to great teams since 2000. That is a sustained run of success.

I do understand why a lot of people hate the Cardinals, especially with the whole hacking thing. It’s also just a natural thing to hate teams that keep winning.

But that doesn’t mean people should be acting like they are now. There’s some idiot running around threads saying how the Cardinals should be disbanded and everything they’ve ever done is luck and cheating. The rhetoric has just gotten out of control.

Spencer
11 years ago
Reply to  Cmart's cups

Pretty funny to see the hate the cards get for being “cheaters” the players didn’t cheat, the organization didn’t cheat. One person did. This isn’t the New England Patriots. This is a respectful well ran organization, that wins. Maybe chokes sometimes in the playoffs, but hey Cubs and Pirates how many division, World Series and overall years have you done better than the cards in the past 50 years? Not many. Winning brings hate, being near top to on top of the game every year, bring hate and stupidity and ignorance, people try to knock you down, it’s part of it. But it’s sad. Nice article Craig!

%
11 years ago
Reply to  Wrigley Ready

They don’t call it Cardinals Devil Magic for no reason!

CircleChange11
11 years ago
Reply to  Wrigley Ready

Yeah, remember that year the cardinals offense led the majors in BA w/ RISP and then couldn’t drive anyone in during the world series. I always knew that offense was a sham.

Like most things we just chalk up to “luck” to simplify … the truth is somewhere in between. Garcia has experienced some luck with BA RISP, but also likely doing some things to positively influence that.

I still can’t believe StL has the best record in baseball despite losing their ace. Heyward leads the team in WAR. Just another typical “How the hell are they doing this?” season.

Jake
11 years ago
Reply to  Wrigley Ready

Talk to me when your in first place. Better yet talk to me when you guys win a championship. Go cards.

Only Glove, No Love
11 years ago

It always infuriated me what a bad rap Jaime got from the Cardinals. It seemed like he couldn’t do anything right: pitch on the road, stay healthy or be mentally tough. And then before this year there seemed to be rumors that he was a goldbrick or neurotic or psychosomatic…

I hope all that nonsense has been put to rest. For a pitcher to come back from what he has is impossible without mental toughness and commitment.

PS. I am a Cards fan so…

Jason Bourne
11 years ago

I don’t ever recall hearing things like this, I just wanted the guy to stay healthy and felt sorry him with all the injuries.

Jim
11 years ago

Wainwright, Lynn, Wacha and Martinez will all start in the rotation. Gonzalez, Cooney and Lyons will start in amemphis and are decent short turn fill ins. Reyes, Weaver and Flaherty are all moving quickly through their system. Given this I think the Cardinals have a choice between Garcia or Lackey and not both after this year. Rumor has it Lackey is looking for a two year deal. Given his age of 38 if that’s the case I’d let him walk and pick up Garcia’s option even given his health history. I think he’s a better pitcher, younger and I like the upside of two years of options while only having to commit to one year at a time. If they want to get creative and prefer Lackey they could also sign him and trade Garcia after picking up his option. Either way picking up his option if he finishes the year healthy is a no brainier which would have been considered crazy just a couple months ago.

Lanidrac
11 years ago
Reply to  Jim

Marco Gonzalez is their top prospect (even ahead of Reyes, in my opinion) and should be ready to jump into the rotation next season. I’d rather bank on him than bring back either Lackey or Garcia. While picking up Garcia’s option is now a possibility, it’s still far from certain even if he finishes the season healthy, as you never know when he’s going to go down next.

Jim
11 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

I’m not sure I’m comfortable penciling Gonzalez in the starting rotation next year. He had a hard time staying healthy earlier this year and has struggled mightily in Memphis the second half of the year.

Jason Bourne
11 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

Gonzalez is NOT their top prospect, but the closest to being ready for a MLB starting spot. Reyes is another year away from competing for a spot.

Lanidrac
11 years ago
Reply to  Jason Bourne

Well, being closer to the Majors is part of what makes a top prospect. Gonzales and Reyes are both projected to be future studs, but since Gonzales is almost here (and already has some MLB experience) with Reyes at least a year away, Marco gets the top spot in my book (now that Piscotty is here to stay). I wouldn’t be surprised if Gonzales makes a run at Rookie of the Year next year.

Greg
11 years ago

Great article. A lot of info on the player in a nice concise manner, I learned a lot, thank you.

Brian
11 years ago

Thank you for saying this: “Using the FanGraphs pitch values alone to determine the effectiveness of a pitch can be misleading, as different pitches interact with each other, potentially helping or hurting their value.” FiveThirtyEight.com ran an article a couple weeks back by Neil Payne (“Game Theory Says R.A. Dickey Should Throw More Knuckleballs”) that somehow completely missed this point, rendering it utterly meaningless.

Jon
11 years ago

People talking about Garcia’s options need to be a little careful about their logic. There’s really two separate issues:

1. Would a Garcia at those prices represent a positive net value player.
2. Would the Cardinals maximize their long-term surplus value by including Garcia at that price on their roster.

If 1=YES, then the Cards exercise the option. I think this is a no-brainer if his arm doesn’t blow up before the end of this season. Heck, right now he looks like the game 1 starter, and not just against the Cubs who have a nasty platoon split against lefties.

Many confuse 2=NO with 1=NO. If 2=NO and 1=YES, they exercise his option and then trade him for prospects. There are teams that obviously should accept his injury risk because they have below replacement value options for SP numbers 4, 5, 6, 7 etc., as opposed to the Cards who even without Garcia and Lackey probably have positive value options for all those slots next year with the other three current starters, Waino, Cooney, Gonzalez, and Reyes.

Lanidrac
11 years ago
Reply to  Jon

I see your point, although the question then becomes does 1 truly = YES when the odds of him staying healthy are so low even in comparison to other starting pitchers? Although, admittedly even if the answer is NO for the Cardinals, it may be YES for other teams. Then again, other teams may prefer to take a flyer on an injury-prone free agent starter to whom they could offer an incentive-laden contract instead of a guaranteed $9M plus the cost in prospects traded.

Nathaniel Dawson
11 years ago

Inducing contact results in a hit 30% of the time

Actually, inducing contact results in a hit about 32% of the time. That may seem like a quibble, but this is a website that deals in percentage points as a way of parsing information to elaborate a point.

Lanidrac
11 years ago

Then again, there’s also some minor skill involved in consistently limiting BABIP (as well as SLG% on balls in play when you get so many grounders).

spudchukar
11 years ago

I don’t believe enough is made of the “strike-one” philosophy, and its effect on BABIP. Once a pitcher gains the count advantage, his pitch selection, pitch location, and velocity and/or break on the ball can be more maximized. A hitters BA slides nearly 100 points after strike one is recorded. Shouldn’t that also translate into evidence that balls leaving one’s bat won’t be as effective?

Hitters too become less confident once they are in the 0-1 hole. Rather than looking for the get ahead fastball, now their mental approach becomes more conservative, again making solid contact less likely.

Strike-one supporters also know two things. First off, strike one is not a get-over pitch. It means quality stuff, outside of the middle of the plate. Secondly, if teams begin to attack the first pitch effectively, then adjustments can be made. It isn’t carved in stone, just allows the team to be one step ahead in the thought process. Plus it puts pressure on teams, who approach the plate with the notion that I cannot let the Cards (or whomever) get ahead, forcing hitters to adjust from patient hitters into attack guys who then put themselves outside of their comfort zone.

Strike One philosophy is a multi-leveled approach and deserves more attention than it gets.

jorgesca
11 years ago

Doesn’t salary get paid by insurance companies when players are in the DL? If that’s the case I wouldn’t hesitate to pick up the options on his contract.