Jason Heyward’s Surprising New Strategy for Success Will Shock You
Jason Heyward was a very good baseball player for a very long time. From 2010-2015, his 25 WAR was one of the top 20 marks in the game and in his final two seasons before free agency, his 10 wins was 10th in all of baseball. In his one season in St. Louis, Jason Heyward was worth 5.6 WAR. In three-plus seasons for Chicago, Heyward has been worth 4.6 WAR as he approaches the midway point of his $184 million contract. To say the contract hasn’t worked out ignores that the Cubs won a World Series in his first season with the club and have won 90+ games in the two subsequent seasons. Heyward hasn’t been a good value early on, but he trended upward slightly last season, hitting at an average level and producing at a above-average level overall when factoring in baserunning and defense. This season, Heyward has been one of the better hitters in baseball in the early going thanks to an a absurd 10 walks compared to just six strikeouts as well as new secret trick: hitting the ball hard.
We probably don’t need to go through all of Heyward’s history, but the table below shows that in his final year before joining the Cubs, Heyward hit the ball relatively hard and often on the ground while with the Cubs, Heyward got the ball in the air more, but hit the ball with less authority.
| Team | Average Exit Velocity | % Rank (min. 200 BB) | Average Launch Angle | wRC+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Cardinals | 89.2 | 66.2% | 4.6 | 121 |
| 2016 | Cubs | 86.7 | 25.5% | 10.6 | 72 |
| 2017 | Cubs | 86.4 | 30.3% | 10.9 | 88 |
| 2018 | Cubs | 88.1 | 47.0% | 9.4 | 99 |
This season, Heyward is off to a great start with a 165 wRC+; his average launch angle is 18 degrees and his exit velocity thus far is 90.5 mph, per Baseball Savant. When we talked about the launch angle revolution and trying to get players who hit the ball hard on the ground to put the ball in the air more, Jason Heyward was a prime example of a player who might benefit. Heyward hit the ball pretty hard with the Cardinals, and most of the time it went on the ground. His ISO wasn’t anything superlative, but he hit the ball hard enough to make himself an above-average offensive player. Heyward did have the one year in 2012 when he hit 27 homers, but that has become an anomaly as his career has progressed. In the first 15 games this season, Heyward has a .255 ISO. Look at this 15-game rolling ISO chart and try to spot the places where Heyward has ever hit with this much power, even in a small sample.

There’s literally no 15-game period with the Cubs in which he’s hit for this much power. He had one, maybe two brief stretches with the Cardinals, he closed the 2013 season well, and had a handful of hot periods during the first three seasons of his career. Since the end of the 2013 season, a period now encompassing more than five seasons, Heyward has had a short stretch like this just a couple of times. His career ISO is .149; the league has averaged an ISO of .151 over that span. Heyward has been, at best, an average power hitter, and over the last few years, he’s been well below. That makes what he has done unusual so far. Of his five extra base hits this season, four have been homers; if a couple of those homers had been doubles, we’d be looking at something more reasonable, though Heyward’s .367 xwOBA indicates he’s still been hitting the ball well, regardless of how many balls have gone over the fence.
What’s even more striking than Heyward’s power output is his discipline. Heyward has walked in 10 of his 63 plate appearances and struck out just six times. He has long been a player who has walked a lot while striking out at a rate better than league average, but this walk rate is one unseen since before his 2015 in St. Louis.

Heyward’s changes in walks and strikeouts are fueled, perhaps unsurprisingly, by swinging at fewer pitches outside the zone and more pitches in the zone.

As he has swung at more pitches in the zone, he’s making contact on more of those pitches as well. One notable part of the graph above is the contact percentage out of the zone. While Heyward has swung at considerably fewer pitches outside the strike zone, he’s missed on those swings at a higher rate. This might suggest that those pitches outside the zone aren’t pitches that are close resulting in weak contact, but rather are pitches where he is actually fooled. Given that his contact rate in the zone has gone up, it’s possible Heyward is simply swinging a bit harder, or more comfortably, at pitches he feels he can drive. That brings us back to launch angle.
Looking purely at average launch angle can be a bit deceiving at times. As the table at the beginning of the post indicates, Heyward did a better job of getting the ball in the air, but he was a much worse hitter. Launch angle charts can help provide some insight into why. First, look at this chart from Heyward’s year in St. Louis, from Baseball Savant.

That huge needle at -25 degrees represents a ton of ground balls that resulted in basically no hits. Then we see a bunch more batted balls from negative 20 degrees though positive 25 degrees with a decent number of hits. Then we see a tiny blip at 40 degrees and another small one at around 60 degrees, basically representing infield fly balls. Heyward was successful above because he hit the ball hard. The graphs below show the Cubs years when Heyward got the ball in the air a little more, but didn’t hit it hard and got poor results.

From 2016 through 2018, there is a massive spike at negative 25 degrees and a lot more negative numbers. There are a few more balls between zero and 20 degrees compared to what we saw in 2015, but not measurably so. We then see an uptick at the higher levels when Heyward was popping balls up; his infield fly percentage was over 18% in each of the past two years, the worst in the majors among the 165 batters with at least 900 plate appearances. Exchanging a few ground balls for infield flies might be a good way to see your average launch angle rise, but it doesn’t make for a better hitter.
It is very early, but Heyward isn’t hitting as many ground balls or infield flies, instead hitting balls much more likely to land for hits or home runs. It’s possible what we are seeing is just a blip and Heyward will revert back to the average hitter he was last year, or regress further. It’s also possible that among all of Heyward’s hitting tweaks over the last decade and improved health, he’s finally found something that can turn his hard-hitting ground ball tendencies into a launch angle converted power hitter. The Cubs tried to tap into Heyward’s power when he first arrived by changing his swing, but a swing designed to turn on inside pitches plus a wrist injury just made Heyward a poor hitter. He has slowly improved the last few seasons, and he’s off to a great start this year. He’s finally hitting the ball hard, again, and if he can keep putting the ball in the air on strikes in the zone, he just might hit well enough to make opting out of his four years and $86 million a consideration instead of a complete non-starter.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
This is a nice bit of analysis, but what about it is supposed to “shock” me? He’s swinging at fewer bad pitches and improving his launch angle. It’s basically Becoming A Better Hitter 101. I kept waiting for the revelation that his improvement involves, like, wearing a bedazzled thong or becoming a raw-food vegan or converting to Islam.
That’s the joke
Pretty sure it’s just a play on the stupid internet ads that go by the same theme
So a click-baity title in other words.
One that assumes that people who click on it will understand what it is, and not be tricked.
I’m sorry, but what in God’s name is this title? These kinds of ckickbait titles degrade excellent articles.
You’ll Never Guess What Jason Heyward Did at the Plate Last Night
Jason Heyward changed his life with one weird trick! You won’t believe what happened next!
You won’t believe what Jason Heyward looks like now!
Sure, Jason Heyward is a good hitter, but have you seen that pole vaulter yet? Click me.
Hitting coaches HATE him!
Five foods Jason Heyward says you should NEVER eat (picture of banana)
Now you’re just trying to bait shirtless bartolo colon.
Does it really degrade it? It’s a joke…
Is it a joke? It’s honestly so hard to tell nowadays.
Yes. It’s a joke. You’ve been told now (twice).
I want few things more in life than Jason Heyward to revert back to 4-5 win Heyward, and not just because I’m a Cubs fan.
Heyward is the kind of ballplayer who’s the most fun to watch. He has a cannon for an arm, goes balls out on every defensive play or weak groundout to 2B (know that too well), rarely strikes out and gets on base at a high clip, and is a clubhouse leader and says and does all the right things. I know we’re paying him like $184M, but damn he is a likable dude.
1- Agree with your points that he feels like the kind of player who “deserves” to be successful, but sadly that’s not how the sport works.
2- As one cubs fan to another, I’d just like to point out that his whole contract is worth it because of the rain delay rally speech in 2016.
He has had a 326 OBP with the Cubs. Not sure I would call that getting on base ‘at a high clip’.
Pitchers Hate Him!!!
I understand why this is exciting, but the idea that Jason Heyward is a success story is kind of strange. He’s a cautionary tale of how changing your swing is really hard, and as likely to backfire as it is to succeed. He just got back to being an average outfielder last year. The only reason he was able to get to this adjustment is because he’d be an enormously expensive 4th outfielder, so the Cubs felt they had no choice but to let him play his way out of it, and got a very long leash. Most players don’t get that luxury.
The good news for Heyward is that with these adjustments, you could see him getting back to the overall production levels he enjoyed in 2012. The batted ball stats we see here on FG from this year actually look similar to the ones from 2012, and that year Heyward put up a 120 wRC+. And you could argue his results from 2013 and 2015 weren’t sustainable, because he wasn’t hitting the ball that hard either year and in 2015 he hit a lot of balls on the ground. So in that way, it’s good. But if you’re going to give someone a contract in excess of $100M, it’s awfully risky if you think your investment depends on changing the swing.
At the time of the investment, though, Heyward was coming off a 5.6 fWAR season with a 121 wRC+ and nearly every season of his career he was 10-20% better than league average. So I do not agree that the Cubs thought the swing had to be changed circa 2016.
And yet…
Perhaps Heyward did this all on his own, but even then, it’s still a cautionary tale.
There are only two constants in life: Khris Davis hitting .247 and Jason Heyward changing his swing.
There are only three constants in life: Khris Davis hitting .247, Jason Heyward changing his swing, and Troy Tulowitzki being placed on the DL.
Fixed it.
Nope. It’s the IL now.
I’m not sure that they “expected” him to change the swing as much as they, and probably he, thought he’d even better if he went with the launch angle trend. They probably didn’t expect that he’d get screwed up for three years by doing so.
For the entirety of Heyward’s career his swing has been changing on what is pretty much a yearly basis. No reason to expect that to change.
He is going to turn 30 this year. Why should we expect him to get back to the level he was at 7 years ago? Who else ever does that?
Wisconsin pitchers are FUMING over this new change!
I feel like every April we get an article about how Jason Heyward has a new approach or old approach or something. I still think he regresses back to the league average type he was last year.
Which would be good if he were still an elite defender but alas he’s approaching average there as well.
“Don’t click on this link unless you want some baseball porn!”
“Bet you can’t name anyone badder than Jason Heyward! 😉 ”
These were also acceptable click bait, bot inspired article titles
Jokes aside though, this is interesting. Heyward has seemed like a colossal bust to me his whole career – the hype was too big, and the defense was the only thing that really made him a star player, it seems. It’s easy to forget he’s only 29. He *could* have another gear in him, surely?
So he’d be able to get more than 4/86 if he does well this year? I’m dubious. He’ll be 30 and I don’t think the trend is to give players in their 30s 4/100 or more.
It’s an interesting article by Craig, but the conclusion that Heyward may seriously consider opting out of the remaining 4 / $86 million on his contract goes way too far, in my opinion.
Even if Heyward ends up hitting well over the whole of the 2019 season, teams won’t simply forget that the 2016-2018 seasons happened. His 2017 and 2018 UZR and DRS also suggest that his corner OF defense has already declined from “elite” to “good”. Add it all up – including that he’s not young by baseball standards anymore, as noted by jcutiger – and I think that teams would have a justifiable view that the risk of an immediate drop-off back to a 1 to 1.5 WAR player is far too great to guarantee him $100+ million on a new contract.
He might opt out if he literally keeps this up and posts a 165 wRC+, but that’s not going to happen.
Agree here on this point. Even when he signed with the Cubs, his history suggested he was a good player not great and the contract was going to be at best at his actual value based on the valuations at that time. Now based on trends for free agents and front offices adjusting their valuations I don’t think there are many teams that sign him at his remaining Cub contract numbers. He could likely get the Josh Reddick contact as a good baseline. It will be interesting to see how he does. As a Braves fan I pull for him but also have tempered my expectations for him.
I am not sure he even can opt out at this point; I thought he already opted into the rest of the contract. If he didn’t and still has an opt out left, I agree with Dave T. Nobody would give him a contract that beats the one he’s getting from the Cubs. No. Way.
He passed on his first opt-out, but he can exercise the other one if he gets 550 PA this year. Will he reach that?
If he keeps hitting like an above-average players then I would guess he will. I still think he’d be crazy to opt-out, though.
“To say the contract hasn’t worked out ignores that the Cubs won a World Series in his first season with the club and have won 90+ games in the two subsequent seasons.”
Please tell me this is tongue-in-cheek.
Many players pointed to his speech during the rain delay in game 7 as being what urged them onto victory. Would someone else have stepped up? Would they have been in a better position to win with another playing RF? Can’t say. FFF though, and he was part of the team that brought a title to the Cubs, so he has to get SOME credit.
By that logic paying any player any price who happened to be on a title winner gives them some credit.
Exceedingly more likely to be an example of the “post hoc ergo propter hoc” fallacy than anything that made a real difference.
Why should we assume that someone on the Indians didn’t equally “urge them onto victory” during the rain delay? If the Cubs had lost, would the public even know about Heyward’s speech? I don’t see how and why any Cubs players would talk about it in interviews if they’d lost.
What’s the proposed mechanism by which this speech made a difference? Are we supposed to think that, but for the grand motivating words of Jason Heyward, professional baseball players would otherwise lack focus and effort playing extra innings in Game 7 of the World Series?
Actually I read that Corey Kluber said “Holy Shit, We’re fucked” so…y’know.
And nobody says Edwuardo Nunez contract is reason for the Red Sox world series win so why is Heyward getting the kid gloves treatment. It’s been a bad contract, leave World Series win out of it.
> professional baseball players would otherwise lack focus and effort playing extra innings in Game 7 of the World Series?
Even professional athletes succumb to pressure and negative emotion at times. That it’s hard to measure that sort of thing doesn’t mean you should dismiss it out of hand.
Jason Heyward was my favorite player on the braves when he was on the team. He is the reason I got into analytics(seeing people argue over his value since it was largely driven by his premium defense). I am very happy he finally figured out that hitting hard groundballs at 2B was not a path to success at the plate. If he goes on to be an above avg hitter (115-125 wRC+) the next couple seasons, he could still make the contract worth it.
It was great to see Heyward wearing 42 on Jackie Robinson Day instead of his usual 4-3.
Was his wrist hurt for 400 games with the Cubs? I hope he has made improvements and plays well, but no, he wasn’t a bad hitter because of injury, he was a bad hitter because he played poorly. It seems some players have a never ending list of excuses but others don’t get that benefit. If he opts out he will be throwing away money.
It would be nice to note that the “hits/batted balls” scales differ in the launch angle charts.
As a long time reader of FG, I have to say that this piece is a good example of how things have deteriorated at this site. If Jeff Sullivan was writing this piece he would have looked at how Heyward’s swing and approach have actually changed with GIFs and pics. Just WATCH. This piece has nothing in it.
It’s not Hayward’s fault that somebody got talked into giving him a better contract than he deserved. I enjoy watching him play and hope he finishes this contract with above average years. Meanwhile, I hope the cubs stay out of the postseason cause other teams deserve time.
Good analysis craig. I don’t believe it’ll last, but it’s interesting to see that it’s happening.
With the cubs Heyward’s hardest hit balls end up in the stands down the first base line. This is due to his ridiculous 2016-2018 swing in which his front elbow collapsed and his bat path rolled over pull side.
Looking good so far but I’m a bit sceptical. Heyward is a tinkerer. A swing change isn’t bad but heyward like buxton essentially has “a new swing” every off season. As soon he is in a slump he will tinker with his swing.
I think we are currently seeing a real skill change but will it stick?
Strategy … or luck?
— He’s 9 for 23 on groundballs, which is lucky no matter how hard you hit the ball.
— His HR/FB is over 18%, at the 80th percentile among qualifiers. He’s never topped 13% in a season.
— His IF/FB is a very high 21%, above the 90th percentile. That’s not a good neighborhood, generally.
There’s still plenty to like in the profile, but there’s likely a good bit of air to come out. No matter what tangible changes support his line to date, 17 games is not much. After all, he ran an .873 OPS in June of last year, to reach .789 for the year — better than his pre-Cubs career total — but sagged to .669 in his last 62 games.