Jordan Hicks Is the Hardest-Throwing Pitcher in Baseball
Before we begin in earnest, here is a table showing the hardest thrown pitches of this young baseball season through Sunday’s games.
| Player | Pitch Velocity (mph) | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Jordan Hicks | 101.6 | 3/29 |
| Jordan Hicks | 101.0 | 4/1 |
| Jordan Hicks | 100.9 | 4/1 |
| Jordan Hicks | 100.9 | 3/29 |
| Jordan Hicks | 100.8 | 3/29 |
| Aroldis Chapman | 100.8 | 3/30 |
| Aroldis Chapman | 100.5 | 3/30 |
| Tayron Guerrero | 100.3 | 4/1 |
| Jordan Hicks | 100.3 | 3/29 |
| Aroldis Chapman | 100.3 | 3/30 |
| Aroldis Chapman | 100.2 | 3/30 |
| Tayron Guerrero | 100.2 | 4/1 |
| Aroldis Chapman | 100.2 | 3/29 |
| Luis Severino | 100.2 | 3/29 |
| Luis Severino | 100.1 | 3/29 |
Right now, St. Louis right-hander Jordan Hicks is throwing harder than Aroldis Chapman. When he did it the first time, it drew some attention, but he repeated that performance on Sunday.
His hold on the title might not last, of course: Chapman could begin throwing harder, and Hicks might not be able to maintain this level of velocity all season. For example, the 21-year-old righty averaged only 98 mph on his fastball in his performance yesterday, getting four outs in what was the first appearance of his professional career without a day of rest.
Hicks was a starter throughout the minors, during which he recorded only 165.1 innings and never worked above High-A. There were indications during spring training that he might have the talent to deal with major-league hitters, but the team sent him to the minors after some issues with tardiness. Despite that, he made his way back to major-league camp and was added to the Opening Day roster even though it required the Cardinals to place Josh Lucas on waivers. Jeff Zimmerman discussed Hicks’ talent and scouting reports after Hicks made the team. We are beginning to see why the Cardinals believed he could impact the club at the highest level in potentially important spots.
In Hicks’ first game on Opening Day, he witnessed Noah Syndegaard’s throw his sinker in the high 90s and, in doing so, might have watched the single pitch most similar to his own two-seam fastball. Witness Syndergaard strike out Tommy Pham with a 97 mph fastball.
That’s a good, hard, sinking fastball. Now let’s see Hicks do the same thing to Todd Frazier on a 99 mph two-seamer.
While high velocities might be more prevalent in today’s game, Hicks’ ability to throw a sinking fastball that hard still qualifies as a rarity. The list below shows Jordan Hicks this year and the pitchers with at least 100 twoseamers or sinkers last year with the highest average pitch velocity, per Baseball Savant.
| Player | Year | Pitches | Pitch Velocity (mph) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Kelly | 2017 | 619 | 99.0 |
| Jordan Hicks | 2018 | 26 | 98.9 |
| Noah Syndergaard | 2017 | 153 | 98.0 |
| Arodys Vizcaino | 2017 | 370 | 97.7 |
| Kelvin Herrera | 2017 | 322 | 97.4 |
| Edwin Diaz | 2017 | 769 | 97.4 |
| Nate Jones | 2017 | 106 | 97.2 |
| Brandon Morrow | 2017 | 111 | 97.2 |
| Blake Treinen | 2017 | 633 | 97.1 |
| Luis Garcia | 2017 | 309 | 97.0 |
| Luis Castillo | 2017 | 339 | 96.9 |
| Frankie Montas | 2017 | 154 | 96.8 |
| Pedro Baez | 2017 | 215 | 96.7 |
| Michael Lorenzen | 2017 | 379 | 96.3 |
| Tommy Hunter | 2017 | 207 | 96.2 |
| Wily Peralta | 2017 | 302 | 96.2 |
| Pedro Strop | 2017 | 379 | 96.2 |
| Blake Wood | 2017 | 426 | 96.1 |
| Zach Britton | 2017 | 516 | 96.0 |
| Raisel Iglesias | 2017 | 278 | 96.0 |
If Hicks’ velocity from the first two games holds up, he can match Aroldis Chapman. If he also throws in some games where his velocity is off a couple ticks, he’ll still be among the tops in baseball this season.
I mentioned earlier that Hicks’ fastball most resembles Noah Syndergaard. Here’s some support below with the same velocity list from above sorted by average spin rate.
| Player | Year | Results | Avg. Spin Rate (rpm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Hunter | 2017 | 207 | 2461 |
| Nate Jones | 2017 | 106 | 2438 |
| Raisel Iglesias | 2017 | 278 | 2405 |
| Brandon Morrow | 2017 | 111 | 2357 |
| Arodys Vizcaino | 2017 | 368 | 2340 |
| Pedro Strop | 2017 | 378 | 2338 |
| Frankie Montas | 2017 | 154 | 2331 |
| Blake Treinen | 2017 | 632 | 2296 |
| Edwin Diaz | 2017 | 768 | 2289 |
| Pedro Baez | 2017 | 215 | 2225 |
| Joe Kelly | 2017 | 616 | 2225 |
| Kelvin Herrera | 2017 | 322 | 2218 |
| Luis Castillo | 2017 | 339 | 2196 |
| Blake Wood | 2017 | 426 | 2192 |
| Michael Lorenzen | 2017 | 377 | 2191 |
| Noah Syndergaard | 2017 | 153 | 2134 |
| Jordan Hicks | 2018 | 26 | 2096 |
| Zach Britton | 2017 | 514 | 2095 |
| Luis Garcia | 2017 | 309 | 2046 |
| Wily Peralta | 2017 | 301 | 1838 |
By spin rate, Hicks is closest to Britton; however, Britton is left-handed — the only left-hander on the list — and perhaps not the best comparison.
Having a fastball like Noah Syndergaard is a very good start for Hicks. He understands that his low-spin fastball helps induce ground balls. Teaching spin rates is an organizational philosophy in St. Louis. There is a problem for Hicks, however — namely, that two-seam fastballs are not swing-and-miss pitches. Syndergaard gets good results from his two-seam fastball because he throws it for strikes and generates a decent amount of swings and a lot of ground balls. Over the course of his career, though, he has gotten whiffs on the pitch just 8% of the time. Those results are in line with Hicks’ minor-league profile, where he generated a lot of ground balls though did not strike out nearly as many batters as one would think given his fastball. Through 26 MLB fastballs, Hicks has gotten just two swings and misses.
Hicks’ signature pitch is a good one, but he’s not going to survive on incredible velocity alone. His primary secondary pitch so far this season has been his slider. He threw just one in his debut but tossed three in each of his last two appearances, getting two whiffs and a called third strike. I asked Hicks about his slider this past offseason, and he mentioned it as the pitch he uses to try and miss bats. This is what the pitch looked like against Jay Bruce.
The pitch worked well against the left-handed Bruce, but it probably has more potential against righties. This is what it looked like yesterday against Manny Pina, when Hicks entered the game with a runner on and two outs.
Hicks doesn’t have a 90 mph slider like Syndergaard. His is a bit softer, not unlike the one typically thrown by Carlos Martinez, but Hicks gets more horizontal movement. Increased usage of the slider is going to be very important for Hicks when it comes to getting strikeouts, and there has been some development in this area: starting around last year’s All-Star break, Hicks eliminated a hitch in his windup and started to get more whiffs. In his first 24 minor-league starts, Hicks struck out 16% of batters and walked 11% of the same. In his final 10 appearances last season, however, Hicks struck out 30% of batters and walked just 7% of hitters.
So far, Hicks’ success has translated to the big leagues despite the lack of experience. He’s generated seven of his 10 outs via the double play or strikeout, with just a single batted ball leaving the infield. He’s also thrown one four-seam fastball, which he had never thrown before the Arizona Fall League. It went well.
If Hicks hadn’t been brought up to the majors, he might be in Double-A Springfield trying to mix in that four-seam fastball and working on a changeup to match with his sinker, a pitch mix not unlike Cardinals’ ace Carlos Martinez. As it stands, Hicks will likely have to put the change on a shelf. That four-seam fastball looks like it could be a weapon, but Hicks should be able to get outs with just the two-seamer and the slider. The latter isn’t as consistent as might be ideal, but if he can throw strikes and get batters to chase the slider, he could be one of the best relievers on the Cardinals from the get-go.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
Can this guy every be a starter, or does his ceiling top out at elite reliever?
I know nothing about this guy, but Eric says that both the slider and changeup had a chance to become average but that he was likely to have below-average command (Eric projected him to 40 command). Eric thought his likely home was going to be destroying batters for one late inning that it seems the Cardinals agreed. In fact, Eric’s whole writeup is pretty similar to Craig’s article here, except that somehow he wound up pitching in 2018 instead of 2020.
https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/top-23-prospects-st-louis-cardinals/
Reminds me of Carlos Martinez, who started his MLB career in the bullpen then converted back to starting, and Trevor Rosenthal, who stayed in the bullpen. I think the Cardinals made a mistake with Rosenthal.
It’s obviously an unknowable hypothetical how Rosenthal would have fared if he’d been allowed to develop more as a starter, but I tend to be pessimistic that he would have provided more value for the Cardinals than he did as a reliever.
He suffered through periodic issues with high walk rates as a reliever, which I think were tied to difficulties repeating his mechanics. Probably not too surprising since he started pitching only shortly before he was drafted in 2009.
You have to wonder if that was the cause or the effect of him pitching out of the bullpen, though. Perhaps it was the sporadic nature of relief pitching that caused him to have difficulty with mechanics.
For my part, I remember him as the crown jewel of the Cardinals’ highly regarded crop of pitching prospects. His minor league walk numbers as a starter were not outstanding, but neither were they terrible.
I don’t think that Rosenthal was ever widely-regarded as the Cardinals’ crown jewel pitching prospect.
Looking at Baseball Reference, he made the major top 100 prospect rankings once (before 2013) at around #40 to #45 on the prospect lists. Shelby Miller was the crown jewel at that point, and Carlos Martinez was also ranked somewhat higher. Both Miller and Martinez had also been ranked highly prior to 2012, while Rosenthal was something of a late climber who hadn’t been in the top 100 before 2013.
Yes. Dave T is correct on both points… Rosie always had trouble w/ his mechanics, and that may have led to his control problems.
The Cards made the correct decision w/ him regarding his relief vs starting role, IMO.
do you think it was a smart decision by the cards to bring him up right away as a reliever as opposed to letting him develop as a starter in the minors?
Looks like organizations differ on this philosophy. There is nothing wrong with him getting reps out of the bullpen at the highest level now. It’s the only way he will learn how work those pitches. They can rest and stretch him out at any point in the season, at the expense of a couple bullpen innings and possibly some innings/pitch/timing restrictions.
Running through his mechanics… they are actually surprisingly good. Not perfect, but the ball is up at impact (Kenny Chesney gif, 0.88), arm follows through cleanly, no unnecessary counter motions.
Where they are on the win curve seems like an important factor in this decision.
was dumb to move him up and skip aa and aaa. cards management has fallen so fast since the scandal. all the front office left to the stros.
It worked for Albert Pujols.
wrong. even he went to AAA before mlb.
sad how far the cards mgmnt has fallen
Do you think it is sad how the management has fallen?
i love the cardinals, theyre my team. but its not a secret that they are trending the wrong direction since all the front office left for the stros.
What is a secret is, apparently, that “all the front office left for the stros”…because no one knows that happened….probably because it didn’t. But parsing the nature of secrets is always difficult.
I’m surprised that Ohtani isn’t on any of the above lists. Coverage of his start, including here, says that he was hitting triple digits, but these charts suggest otherwise.
Otani can hit 102, but he sat high nineties and “only” flashed 98 in his first start. Velo tends to go up after the first few weeks of the season.
Lists look like they were pulled from 2017 with Hicks’ limited 2018 sample thrown in manually. I’m sure Ohtani will be up there soon.
The top list is pitches from 2018. You’re right about the other lists, though.
He hit 100 and AVERAGED 98 (according to Jeff’s article on Monday).
I hate to sound like a jabroni, but here it goes anyway:
1. So will his stuff actually strike people out? If so, at elite levels?
2. It sounds like he will be sent back down to work on his pitch mix, no?
3. Should I own him in a ten teamer (saves and holds), or use the roster spot for someone with a more defined role and higher k rates, like Peacock, Kela, or Yates?
He has SP eligibility in ESPN so I think absolutely worth owning there. What makes it sound like he’ll get sent down to work on his pitch mix?
1. At the moment, his K rate is not elite but good. It could approach elite if he unlocks the potential of his other offerings besides the sinker that is discussed in this article.
3. I am in a 10 teamer with saves and holds and I am rostering him because he has SP eligibility. I probably would not roster him if he did not have that as you state, there are other relievers with Elite K rates and get more consistent hold situations.
1- For most Pitchers velocity drops with age, peaking in the early 20’s.
2- In the old days, “a young pitcher’s place is the bullpen”.
3- A lot of young pitchers spend their early 20’s in the minors building stamina (getting stretched out) mastering third and fourth pitches.
There might a competitive advantage for a team to sort young pitchers early and see if projected mid -rotation and backend starters might not be better off mastering their secondary pitches in the bullpen while they can still bring the heat. There is such a thing as “effectively wild”, especially for relievers.
Hicks isn’t the first such case we’ve seen recently.
Edwin Diaz comes to mind.
For quite a while relievers have been seen as “failed starters”but maybe a better model as starters in finishing school. Work to command the top two pitches, then move to the complementary pitches and then build the stamina to start.
Old school revisited.
Maybe?
Just wondering…
The Cardinals aren’t unique in having young starting pitchers get their first MLB experience via a partial year to full year in the bullpen, but it is a strategy that they’ve used frequently.
Alex Reyes, Carlos Martinez, Shelby Miller, Lance Lynn, and (going way back) Adam Wainwright all had healthy doses of relieving in their first use in the majors, and then transitioned into full-time starters (that process is somewhat ongoing with Reyes, but I think that he almost certainly would have been in the rotation in 2017 if he hadn’t needed TJ surgery). I think that it also ties with a front office philosophy of being very reluctant to give up the high prospect value required to trade for top-tier rental relievers in-season.
The major difference for Hicks versus those prior examples is that he jumped so far (from high A ball, while the other prior examples had progressed to the high minors as starters).
And that is what has me wondering.
Would jumping a High A pitcher to the bullpen provide more overall value to the team than sending him to AA to hone pitches he won’t use very often early in his career? If ever. Strong armed relievers mostly work off two pitches anyway.
Um… I guess I’m gonna say it if nobody else will…
Yet another Craig Edwards Cardinals Puff Piece!
But for reals, Hicks is exciting . I wonder how long Holland keeps his new job…
It is a bad idea to get excited over 3+ IP. How much of this is sustainable? I guess we will see. The race to be first to jump on the bandwagon is just something that I don’t really get. Maybe it is because I have been a fan of baseball for decades.
You kids, get off of my lawn!
Touting prospects in the first month of the season based on insanely low sample sizes is my favorite time of year.
Ah, bring back Jeremy Hazelbaker’s moment of glory!