José Ramírez Is in a Quarter-Season Long Slump

In my short time so far at FanGraphs, there have been a couple of underlying similarities between the player profile-style pieces that I have written. All three of them have been about under-the-radar pitchers, whether it be about Chase Anderson or Dan Straily or Jimmy Yacabonis, and all three articles have focused on their individual pitches or repertoires.

Today, I will take a different tact. First, it’s about a hitter, and second, this hitter is not, by any means, “under-the-radar.” José Ramírez slashed .270/.387/.552 in 698 plate appearances last year, producing a total of 8.0 WAR, a figure that ranked third in all of baseball. Ramírez even had a solid case at the American League MVP award, finishing third behind Mookie Betts and Mike Trout. That’s really good! That’s better than really good; it’s elite. Ramírez has truly been one of the best players in baseball over the last three years now, and we should all appreciate that.

The problem is, though, José Ramírez actually hasn’t been good lately. And I’m not just talking about his slow start to the 2019 season (11 wRC+ in his first 20 PA); Ramírez’s slump has actually been quite long. Over his last 40 games, dating back to August 21 of last season, Ramírez has slashed .170/.298/.279 across 178 plate appearances. His 60 wRC+ during this stretch was the 17th-lowest in the major leagues, among 228 players with at least 100 plate appearances. That puts him in the undoubtedly-not-elite 7th percentile. Just to add insult to injury, this excludes the 2018 postseason, in which Ramírez did not record a single hit and managed just one walk across 12 plate appearances, good for a .000/.083/.000 line.

First, let’s break down the good of this slump. And, yes, there is actually some good to be analyzed.

Over these 40 games, Ramírez’s plate discipline has still been elite. He’s walked just as many times (25) as he struck out, which actually ranks tied for the 10th-best BB/K rate in that stretch. Both his swinging-strike rate (5.2% vs. 5.0% career) and his outside-the-zone swing rate (23.0% vs. 25.3%) in these 40 games are also just about as good, or better, than his career averages. At a minimum, this is very good to see. A slumping hitter who still manages to post good plate discipline numbers could mean a reversal of luck is soon possible. Ramírez has dealt with an absolutely horrid .187 BABIP during this stretch, something that will surely increase in due time.

So, are we able to conclude that this slump is purely as a result of poor luck? I’d say not so fast. There are indeed some concerning numbers in here, including a 27.2% hard-hit rate, an 11.5-point drop from his 38.7% hard-hit rate from Opening Day until the slump started. Also interesting is the fact that he’s seen a fastball just 48.7% of the time, a 1.4-point drop from 50.1% mark in those first 540 plate appearances. To fill the void, he has seen slight increases in both the frequency of curveballs and changeups.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

These two factors seem to go hand-in-hand, until they don’t. Ramírez is indeed a phenomenal fastball hitter, having put up a .292/.375/.538 (153 wRC+) slash line against them in his career. He’s still pretty solid against changeups (152 wRC+), but he’s significantly worse against both curveballs (99 wRC+) and sliders (91 wRC+). But even with this noted, Ramírez hasn’t seen a huge jump in curveball-slider frequency (28.5% before the slump versus 29.2% during). And there haven’t been noticeable differences in where pitchers are pitching him, either.

One thing that is interesting from Ramírez’s pre- versus during-slump numbers is his pull-rate. Prior to his slump, Ramírez pulled 52.7% of his batted balls. During it, he’s pulled just 37.6%. (The MLB-average pull-rate was 40.3% in 2018.) And, pulling the ball is where Ramírez gets the majority of his power. When he pulled the ball last season, his hard-hit rate was 45.6%, posting a .530 wOBA and a 241 wRC+. But, when Ramírez went the other way, he posted a .188 wOBA and a 7 wRC+.

Why would Ramírez start trying to hit the ball the other way, especially if that’s not what works for him? One answer could be that he began trying too hard to beat the shift. Ramírez is a switch-hitter, and he was shifted at a drastically different rate when he batted right-handed (6.3% of the time) versus left-handed (53.0% of the time). If Ramírez was truly getting in his head and trying too hard to beat the shift, then we’d expect to see his pull percentage drop even further for when he hit lefty versus when he hit righty. And that’s exactly what happened. While Ramírez did see his pull-rate drop by not-insignificant 9.2 points as a right-handed hitter from prior to the slump to during it, his pull-rate dropped by 19.2 points (!) as a lefty.

What’s weird about this whole thing, however, are the resulting numbers. During the slump, Ramírez has posted a .355 wOBA on balls hit to the opposite field compared to just a .179 wOBA on balls hit to the pull side. But, numbers can be deceiving, especially if Ramírez is getting a lot of poorly-hit base hits to the opposite field. That’s why xwOBA would be a better metric to break this down, and, indeed, Ramírez’s pull-side xwOBA (.255) is still 95 points above his xwOBA to the opposite field (.160).

Here’s an example of a left-handed hitting Ramírez getting jammed on a pitch that’s middle-in, and still trying to take it to the opposite field. The exit velocity here is just 73.0 mph:

And now here’s an example of Ramírez again taking an inside pitch to the opposite field, but this time it results in a weakly-hit single. Across all of baseball in 2018, the average exit velocity on a single was 89.8 mph. This single was hit at just 82.6 mph:

Maybe he could have done more with those pitches if he pulled them, but maybe not. Still, the data is the data, and Ramírez is certainly trying to go to the opposite field a lot more often during this stretch of poor results than he was trying to beforehand. Whether that’s him consciously trying to avoid the shift or not, I don’t know.

Luckily for him, though, he’s actually faced a 40-game slump nearly as bad as the one he is currently in:

From July 14, 2017 to August 27, 2017, Ramírez had a 40 game stretch in which he posted a .264 wOBA and a 56 wRC+, the latter of which marks is actually worse than the wRC+ he is currently posting. Here’s a quick comparison of Ramírez’s selected stats during both of his slumps, along with his career averages:

Comparing José Ramírez’s Slumps
Slump wOBA BB% K% SwStr% GB/FB Pull% Hard% BABIP
2017 .264 5.9% 11.8% 4.7% 1.02 51.8% 25.9% .254
Current .264 14.0% 14.0% 5.2% 0.79 37.6% 27.2% .187
Career Average .357 9.6% 11.1% 5.0% 1.03 44.0% 30.1% .291

As you can see, the slumps were similar, but different. In the 2017 slump, Ramírez still pulled the ball at an extraordinarily high rate; during this current slump, as I’ve already discussed, he has not. In his current slump, though, he’s still posting a higher hard-hit rate than he did in his first slump. A hot bat came back from that slump, so there’s no reason to think a hot bat won’t come back from this one. And as we’ve discussed, Ramírez’s plate discipline is also encouraging. Seeing that he’s still walking as much as he’s striking out suggests that he’s not pressing; he’s not trying to overcompensate for his recent poor performance. He’s still finding his pitches to hit, but for now, they’re just not falling (or going in the correct direction).

With all of this said, I don’t think there’s much to worry about here. I’m sure that the Indians, with one of the worst lineups in baseball, would like Ramírez to rebound sooner rather than later, but I’d be willing to bet that he does eventually turn it around. You can’t be one of the best hitters in baseball for a two-year span without being able to come back from a slump of this magnitude, and as it turns out, Ramírez has already done this once before.





Devan Fink is a Contributor at FanGraphs. You can follow him on Twitter @DevanFink.

25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DustyColorado
7 years ago

Wander Javier is a slump free bat and coming to the AL Central soon. Save this tweet.

SirCharlesKMember since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  DustyColorado

You’re going to have a hell of a time gaining traction with memes here.

Andrew Luptak
7 years ago

Great piece.. a lot of the things you mentioned I’ve picked up on over the course of watching him almost everyday for the slump but it was nice seeing numbers backing it.. but I especially enjoyed the comparison to his previous slump.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago

Trying to beat that shift is dumb. Yeah the shift will cost you 10 points of on base percentage but what do those 10 points help you if you lose 40 points of slugging?

People talk about gallo and the shift but gallo is not a .200 hitter due to the shift but because he Ks almost 40% of the time.

I would recommend any pull power hitter to just accept that .275 babip and get your bombs, bautista did fine with this approach. Maybe drop an occasional bunt to keep the defense honest but don’t go against your natural swing. I mean if you have natural center-oppo power like trout or Khris davis that is ideal but pure pull power hitters will just spin off the ball and flare it weakly if the go oppo because they don’t have a centered swing direction like trout.

carterMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

To be fair, if you watch Gallo in 2019 he is not a 200 hitter. I’d venture closer to . 250

SirCharlesKMember since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  carter

Let’s pump the brakes on that. We have over 1000 ABs that say he’s a 200 hitter and 22 ABs in 19 that say he’s north of that. We should check back in on him in May.

carterMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  SirCharlesK

Closer to 250 means 225. Steamer has him at 226..not sure about the downvotes. He made significant changes late last year, significantly underperformed (10%ish) expected batting average, and changed batted ball quality late in the year. Is that better?

BradleyZimmernsBizarreHitsMember since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  carter

Steamer says .227 which yes is marginally closer to the Mendoza line but the average of the 4 projections is .222.

Let’s not use a SSS and cherry pick one projection to pretend he’s actually changing. Even if we are to take his improved discipline (17% O Swing is ridiculous and likely unsustainable the) and decrease in Swinging Strike % as legit changes, his K rate is way too low for his swinging strike rate.

He’s got a higher average than BABIP in part because he’s also hitting home runs at a ridiculous rate.

So yeah, he could be close to .250 if he hits 50 home runs, only has 14% Swinging strikes, and an under 30% K rate but none of these scenarios are particularly likely to continue, let alone all three happening

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  carter

200 was a slight hyperbole, he has been s .210 hitter in his career so far:)

guster9285
7 years ago

This kind of surprised me, on broadcasts this year there has actually be discussion of him trying to pull too much. There’ve been some breaking balls he’s been caught reaching way out in front of. Did you look at breakout of pull rates between different pitch types? I’m wondering if it might be more of a timing / recognition issue than an attempt to pull less.

Zenslinger
7 years ago

Fantastic piece.

“Tack”, not “tact”. Sailing term.

John Autin
7 years ago

Fwiw, using Jeff Sullivan’s signature “That’s really good!” only makes me miss him more.

Shalesh
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Really? I love Jeff Sullivan’s work, but the new Fangraphs is cranking out a lot of great content. Stuff we read Monday is off the front page by Wednesday. I haven’t missed Jeff yet, but that may be because “I don’t know what I’m missing.” Jeff had/has the ability to surprise us all the time.

And I’ll admit to being skeptical of Devan Fink’s ability as a recent high school grad. But this is article is fantastic. Great job, Devan! I’m a fan of yours! And great selection by Meg and Dave Appelman!

SirCharlesKMember since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  Shalesh

It’s probably more “These guys are great but I still miss Jeff”

John Autin
7 years ago
Reply to  SirCharlesK

Actually, it’s “100% turnover within the past 3 years, coupled with the accelerating focus on technocentric analytics, leaves me just a bit cold.”

And if that boils down to Grandpa yelling at clouds, so be it.

Dan_F_30
7 years ago

I watched his at bat last night that he eventually fouled a ball off his foot on. He looked lost at the plate and swung wildly at sliders at his feet. It was ugly. I was cringing. Thanks for putting into perspective.

shaned23Member since 2018
7 years ago

Great article. Just one thing I wanted to mention was that he might just be a guy that doesn’t perform well, for whatever reason, in the first week or so and the last month or so of the season. Looking at the wOBA curves, you see a pretty familiar pattern at the beginning of each year and the end of each year. He had 2 hits in his first 9 games last season. He’s already doing better than that this year (3 hits in 6 games).

The fouls off his legs certainly aren’t helping him this season either.

BradleyZimmernsBizarreHitsMember since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  shaned23

As a Cleveland fan and someone who’s had him in fantasy, there also has been the trend where he isn’t good at the beginning of the end of the year. But, in this case there’s definitely a trend in approach that we can see

szakylMember since 2024
7 years ago

I can’t recall if it was just opening day or if he’s attempted since, but multiple PAs that day he tried bunting for a single against the shift. They were some of the most cringe-worthy attempts I’ve seen in a while, but it does support the idea of Ramirez going against his strengths in order to beat the shift.

TomahawkChopperMember since 2020
7 years ago

Is exit velocity on a jammed pop up or weak grounder indicative of anything besides weak contact? I’m much more interested in his average exit velocity over the last 40 games than I am two cherry-picked plate appearances.

eMetsMember since 2018
7 years ago

Indeed, and saying that he’s “trying to take it to the opposite field” on the Glasnow 96-mph heater upstairs is subjective at best ….. sure looked late to me while going gap-right or up the middle at worst. Still, I appreciate the pattern recognition in this article, and hope Jose doesn’t try to compensate for his lineup-mates all year.

WARrior
7 years ago

Trout had a very similar type of slump, also extending from the end of one season to the beginning of the next. Beginning in early September 2017, and continuing through the first two weeks of 2018, he had a stretch of 33 games that wasn’t quite as bad as Ramirez’s–.193/.326/.454, wRC+ 108—but was also marked by a horrendous BABIP, .167. Also like Ramirez, while his balls were not dropping for hits, his BB/K rate was about dead even, which at that time was a first for him.

The portion of that slump in September 2017 cost him whatever shot he had of the MVP he had after missing nearly 50 games with an injury (certainly cost him making top 3, finishing behind Ramirez himself that year), this despite the fact that his plate discipline was better than ever.

He had a much worse slump in August 2015–wRC+ 83–but that was marked by a decent if low BABIP, and a high K-rate, and probably was due to a llngering injury.

LHPSU
7 years ago

On August 13 this happened:
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/a-taxonomy-of-striking-out-against-a-position-player-pitching/

Ramirez was hitting .301/.412/.631 going into that game. He has hit .186/.308/.333 since.

Coincidence? I THINK NOT.

emh1969
7 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Hmmm….your link goes to an article from a few days ago.

And I can’t seem to find a Jose Ramirez article that came out on August 13th. There was one that came out a week earlier called “José Ramírez Is About to Crush History”.

Is that the one you’re referring to or is it it another one?

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/jose-ramirez-is-about-to-crush-history/

coldbagel12Member since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

He’s referring to an article that talked about José Ramirez striking out against a position player on August 13th. Read the linked article.