Justin Verlander Is Dominating Despite All of the Dingers
It’s been a weird season thus far for Justin Verlander. On the one hand, the 36-year-old righty has enjoyed dominant stretches and generally pitched well enough to put himself in the conversation for another All-Star appearance (perhaps even a start) and that elusive second Cy Young Award, all while advancing his case for eventual election to the Hall of Fame. On the other hand, he’s struggling to keep the ball in the park like never before — but then, that describes most pitchers in a year of record-setting home run rates. The combination has created some very unusual, extreme statistics
On Sunday, Verlander threw seven strong innings against the Yankees in the Bronx, allowing just four hits, two walks, and three runs while striking out nine. The runs all came via a three-run homer by DJ LeMahieu, but the blast was of trivial importance, hit at a time when the Astros owned a commanding 9-0 lead. The trivia was shared by both teams. It was the 26th straight game in which the Yankees homered, a franchise record and one short of the major league record, held by the 2002 Rangers. It was also the first time since April 15, 2017 — back when he was still a Tiger — that Verlander had surrendered a three-run homer.
I’ll get back to the home runs momentarily. The Astros’ 9-4 win gave Verlander his 10th victory of the season and the 214th of his career; he’s second among active pitchers behind only CC Sabathia, who claimed his 250th win last week. His 142 strikeouts trail only teammate Gerrit Cole for the league lead, while his 2.67 ERA is good for fourth. However, because he’s served up 21 homers in 114.2 innings — a career-high 1.65 per nine — his FIP is a less-impressive 3.77, and his ERA-FIP differential of -1.10 ranks third in the AL. Depending upon one’s choice of pitching value metrics, he either looks like a Cy hopeful (second in bWAR at 3.8) or just a solid All-Star candidate (tied for ninth in fWAR at 2.5).
Verlander has become an increasingly fly-ball-oriented pitcher at a time when home run rates are at their highest sustained levels ever. He hasn’t had a ground-ball rate above 40%, or a ground-ball-to-fly-ball ratio of 1.0 or higher, since 2012; he’s been below 35% in the former category and below 0.8 in the latter in each of the past five seasons, with rates of 34.7% and 0.73 this year. Meanwhile, home runs per team per game are at an all-time high (1.36), and they’re certain to remain above 1.1 for an unprecedented fourth straight year, surpassing the 1999-2001 surge in that department.
Both Verlander’s raw home run rate and 16.9% HR/FB rate are well beyond his previous career highs (1.19 per nine and 11.5%, respectively); he owns the league’s eighth-highest mark in the former (again, 1.65 per nine) and is 11th in the latter. Yet even with those gaudy rankings, he’s the majors’ only ERA qualifier who is allowing at least 1.2 homers per nine while maintaining an ERA below 3.00 (the Rays’ Yonny Chirinos is right at 3.00 despite 1.45 HR/9). Verlander has been able to do that because he’s excelled at keeping runners off base. Some of that — his MLB-low .175 BABIP, 51 points ahead of the second-ranked Mike Fiers — is thanks in part to his defense, though his .262 xwOBA is in the 91st percentile. Some of it owes to a 5.1% walk rate, the second-lowest of his career, and some of it owes to sequencing. Seventeen of the 21 homers he’s allowed have been solo homers, with a trio of two-run shots accounting for the other ones besides LeMahieu’s big blast (in case you were wondering, he hasn’t served up a grand slam since April 11, 2010). He’s allowed a total of 35 runs all season, and 26 of them have come via dingers. His 74.3% rate is the highest in the majors:
| Pitcher | Team | IP | R | HR | RHR | RHR% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Verlander | Astros | 114.2 | 35 | 21 | 26 | 74.3% |
| J.A. Happ | Yankees | 84.1 | 49 | 20 | 34 | 69.4% |
| Masahiro Tanaka | Yankees | 98.0 | 39 | 13 | 24 | 61.5% |
| Clayton Kershaw | Dodgers | 79.0 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 61.5% |
| Jack Flaherty | Cardinals | 80.2 | 39 | 15 | 23 | 59.0% |
| Miles Mikolas | Cardinals | 89.1 | 44 | 14 | 25 | 56.8% |
| Mike Fiers | Athletics | 94.1 | 45 | 15 | 25 | 55.6% |
| Tyler Mahle | Reds | 77.2 | 38 | 13 | 21 | 55.3% |
| Mike Leake | Mariners | 101.0 | 59 | 22 | 32 | 54.2% |
| Charlie Morton | Rays | 93.2 | 26 | 7 | 14 | 53.8% |
| Shane Bieber | Indians | 91.0 | 41 | 16 | 22 | 53.7% |
| Zack Greinke | Diamondbacks | 102.0 | 34 | 12 | 18 | 52.9% |
| Wade Miley | Astros | 89.2 | 36 | 13 | 19 | 52.8% |
| Mike Minor | Rangers | 103.2 | 29 | 11 | 15 | 51.7% |
| Yonny Chirinos | Rays | 87.0 | 31 | 14 | 16 | 51.6% |
Coincidentally, Happ was Verlander’s opposite on Sunday. He allowed a leadoff homer to Jose Altuve, a grand slam to Tyler White, and a two-run homer to Yordan Alvarez to account for seven of his eight runs allowed in four innings, goosing his RHR% by a few points. He’s not having a particularly good season (5.23 ERA, 5.47 FIP), but by and large, the above group of pitchers is a good one, even if some of them aren’t having typically strong campaigns; seven of them have both their ERA and FIP below 4.00, and another four have both below the MLB average of 4.46. They generally do a solid job of limiting the damage when they’re giving up home runs.
Here’s the other end of the leaderboard:
| Pitcher | Team | IP | R | HR | RHR | RHR% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lance Lynn | Rangers | 100.0 | 48 | 9 | 9 | 18.8% |
| Sandy Alcantara | Marlins | 89.2 | 42 | 6 | 9 | 21.4% |
| Joe Musgrove | Pirates | 84.2 | 50 | 8 | 11 | 22.0% |
| Brad Keller | Royals | 97.0 | 49 | 6 | 11 | 22.4% |
| Tanner Roark | Reds | 80.1 | 34 | 6 | 8 | 23.5% |
| Marco Gonzales | Mariners | 96.2 | 60 | 10 | 15 | 25.0% |
| Frankie Montas | Athletics | 90.0 | 34 | 7 | 9 | 26.5% |
| Brett Anderson | Athletics | 88.2 | 44 | 9 | 12 | 27.3% |
| Marcus Stroman | Blue Jays | 100.2 | 43 | 9 | 12 | 27.9% |
| Noah Syndergaard | Mets | 95.0 | 52 | 11 | 15 | 28.8% |
| Max Scherzer | Nationals | 106.1 | 34 | 8 | 10 | 29.4% |
| Martin Perez | Twins | 82.0 | 46 | 7 | 14 | 30.4% |
| Luis Castillo | Reds | 91.1 | 30 | 8 | 10 | 33.3% |
| Jake Odorizzi | Twins | 80.1 | 24 | 6 | 8 | 33.3% |
| Robbie Ray | Diamondbacks | 88.1 | 49 | 12 | 17 | 34.7% |
That’s no group of slouches either. Seven of them have both an ERA and FIP below 4.00, and another six have both marks below 4.45. Lynn, the AL WAR leader (3.3), has yet to allow a home run with a runner on base.
While I wish I could place Verlander’s rate in historical perspective, it turns out that there’s no publicly available tool to do so with any reasonable efficiency. Baseball-Reference, Baseball Prospectus, FanGraphs, MLB — none of those sites offers breakdowns of home runs hit with zero, one, two, or three men on base in a way that can be used to compare pitchers across multiple seasons; as it was, it took me an hour to figure out how to use my limited VLOOKUP skillz to cobble together 2019 data from B-Ref’s Event Finder and Play Index. That said, we can get a vague sense of just how unusual Verlander’s season is simply by using home runs per run allowed, even if assuming that every home run allowed is a solo homer does seem a stretch. Here’s a leaderboard (h/t Craig Edwards) that ostensibly covers all seasons back to 1871, though not a single pre-integration performance comes close to cracking the upper reaches:
| Name | Team | Year | R | HR | HR/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Verlander | Astros | 2019 | 35 | 21 | 0.600 |
| Clayton Kershaw | Dodgers | 2017 | 49 | 23 | 0.469 |
| John Candelaria | Pirates | 1977 | 64 | 29 | 0.453 |
| Yonny Chirinos | Rays | 2019 | 31 | 14 | 0.452 |
| Mike Fiers | Tigers/A’s | 2018 | 71 | 32 | 0.451 |
| Justin Verlander | Astros | 2018 | 63 | 28 | 0.444 |
| Curt Schilling | Diamondbacks | 2001 | 86 | 37 | 0.430 |
| Ramon Ortiz | Angels | 2002 | 97 | 40 | 0.412 |
| Sid Fernandez | Orioles | 1994 | 66 | 27 | 0.409 |
| J.A. Happ | Yankees | 2019 | 49 | 20 | 0.408 |
| Jose Lima | Dodgers | 2004 | 81 | 33 | 0.407 |
| Ian Kennedy | Royals | 2016 | 81 | 33 | 0.407 |
| Robbie Ray | Diamondbacks | 2017 | 57 | 23 | 0.404 |
| Max Scherzer | Nationals | 2016 | 77 | 31 | 0.403 |
| Billy Pierce | White Sox | 1958 | 83 | 33 | 0.398 |
| Lee Stange | Twins | 1963 | 53 | 21 | 0.396 |
| A.J. Griffin | Athletics | 2013 | 91 | 36 | 0.396 |
| Dan Haren | Marlins/Cubs | 2015 | 79 | 31 | 0.392 |
| Pedro Ramos | Indians | 1963 | 74 | 29 | 0.392 |
| Eric Milton | Phillies | 2004 | 110 | 43 | 0.391 |
| Blake Snell | Rays | 2018 | 41 | 16 | 0.390 |
| Shane Bieber | Indians | 2019 | 41 | 16 | 0.390 |
| Chris Young | Padres | 2006 | 72 | 28 | 0.389 |
| Hyun-Jin Ryu | Dodgers | 2019 | 18 | 7 | 0.389 |
| Dan Straily | Reds | 2016 | 80 | 31 | 0.388 |
Just five of the top 25 seasons occurred before the turn of the millennium, while five of them are from this year, with three from last year and another six from 2015-17. This period, with a combination of high home run rates and low batting averages, has made for favorable conditions in this department. For what it’s worth, among the other seasons that crack the top 10 in the above table, the highest in terms of RHR% is Fiers at 61.9%, followed by Kershaw (61.2%), Fernandez (57.6%), 2018-model Verlander (55.6%), Ortiz (53.6%), Schilling (53.5%), and Candelaria (53.1%). All of which is to say that it seems pretty rare to post an RHR% above 60%, though I’ll await the day when I have greater processing power at my disposal to confirm that.
In addition to putting a pin in that search, there’s one other ratio to keep an eye on with respect to Verlander’s season. He entered Sunday with 20 walks and homers allowed apiece, but in walking two and serving up just one gopher ball, he fell off a comparatively short list of ERA qualifiers with at least as many home runs allowed as walks:
| Player | Team | Year | HR | BB | HR/BB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Silva | Twins | 2005 | 25 | 9 | 2.78 |
| Tommy Bond | Atlantics | 1874 | 15 | 8 | 1.88 |
| Josh Tomlin | Indians | 2016 | 36 | 20 | 1.80 |
| Brian Anderson | Diamondbacks | 1998 | 39 | 24 | 1.63 |
| Brad Radke | Twins | 2005 | 33 | 23 | 1.43 |
| Mike Leake | Mariners | 2019 | 22 | 16 | 1.38 |
| Rick Reed | Twins | 2002 | 32 | 26 | 1.23 |
| David Wells | Yankees | 2003 | 24 | 20 | 1.20 |
| Carlos Silva | Twins | 2006 | 38 | 32 | 1.19 |
| Hyun-Jin Ryu | Dodgers | 2019 | 7 | 6 | 1.17 |
| Robin Roberts | Phillies | 1956 | 46 | 40 | 1.15 |
| David Wells | Padres | 2004 | 23 | 20 | 1.15 |
| Brad Radke | Twins | 2003 | 32 | 28 | 1.14 |
| Josh Tomlin | Indians | 2011 | 24 | 21 | 1.14 |
| Jon Lieber | Phillies | 2006 | 27 | 24 | 1.13 |
| Jon Lieber | Yankees | 2004 | 20 | 18 | 1.11 |
| Jose Lima | Astros | 1998 | 34 | 32 | 1.06 |
| Greg Maddux | Cubs | 2004 | 35 | 33 | 1.06 |
| Bartolo Colon | Mets | 2015 | 25 | 24 | 1.04 |
| Gary Nolan | Reds | 1976 | 28 | 27 | 1.04 |
| Rick Reed | Mets | 1998 | 30 | 29 | 1.03 |
| Bronson Arroyo | Reds | 2011 | 46 | 45 | 1.02 |
| Cherokee Fisher | Reds | 1876 | 6 | 6 | 1.00 |
| Lew Burdette | Braves | 1959 | 38 | 38 | 1.00 |
| La Marr Hoyt | Padres | 1985 | 20 | 20 | 1.00 |
| Bret Saberhagen | Mets | 1994 | 13 | 13 | 1.00 |
| David Wells | Yankees | 1998 | 29 | 29 | 1.00 |
| David Wells | Red Sox | 2005 | 21 | 21 | 1.00 |
| Curt Schilling | Red Sox | 2006 | 28 | 28 | 1.00 |
| Phil Hughes | Twins | 2014 | 16 | 16 | 1.00 |
Those are some guys who could pound the ol’ strike zone, which generally kept them out of trouble even if they couldn’t always keep the ball in the yard. The list goes all the way back to the 19th century (Bond with the 1874 Brooklyn Atlantics of the National Association, Fisher with the 1876 Reds in the National League’s inaugural season) but also includes two other pitchers from this season who may pull through even if Verlander doesn’t. It’s lousy with Twins (six of them, including the great Radke and the not-so-great Silva), and features Wells four times in three different uniforms.
Verlander’s season has been strange but largely effective, continuing the momentum that he’s built since being dealt to Houston in late 2017. With 200 wins further in the rear-view mirror, 3,000 strikeouts approaching (he’s at 2,848), and his JAWS at 56.5 — 6.5 points higher than last year, and now just 6.0 shy of the starting pitcher standard — he may have already cemented his berth in Cooperstown, particularly given that he’s signed for another 2 1/2 seasons. Still, it’s been a weird year, and it will be very interesting to see where the numbers I’ve highlighted here finally land.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
When you refer to him being 11th in the league, you must be referring to the American League, right? And not Major League Baseball? To get Yonny Chirinos on the list we have to drop the minimum IP to 60 (which I agree is reasonable at this point in the season) but that puts him 30th in MLB.
I was referring to AL, yes, but I can see where there’s some confusion. Chirinos has 87 total innings, enough to qualify for the ERA title, so the sentence is more precise if I change to, “Yet even with those gaudy rankings, he’s the majors’ only ERA qualifier who is allowing at least 1.2 homers per nine while maintaining an ERA below 3.00 (the Rays’ Yonny Chirino is right at 3.00 despite 1.45 HR/9).”
On the one hand his HR/FB is way higher than his career average and much higher than any inidividual season however he is also giving up an elevated % of hard and pulled contact….. it would be interesting to know now much his HR/FB rate “should” jump given those higher rates…
I have no data to support this, other than I watch/listen every Astros game, but I strongly believe that they have two different strategies to attack hitters based on runners being on base or not.
Bases empty, attacking the zone up and looking for strikeouts. Comfortable with the risk/reward of giving up homers.
Runners on, looking for weak contact or strikeouts down in the zone. Risk tolerance is much smaller.
Again, I don’t have the data, but a large portion of their homers surrendered by all starters seem to be of the solo variety over multiple years now to the point where it can’t just be random luck.
Per the spits tool on this site, HOU starters:
Bases empty – 30.4% K rate, 1.8 HR/9, 41.3% GB rate
Men on – 25.3% K rate, 1.2 HR/9, 44.4% GB rate.
You may be right, but might need to look at location/pitch type to confirm your hypothesis.
Will be interesting to see which caves first- the low BA & BABIP or the high HR% & HR/FB #’s. If the BA craters, while the HR’s stay the same, he will have an ugly 2nd half. If it’s the reverse, he’ll get his 2nd Cy Young. If they both correct, does he stay near where he is, but, with more normal metrics?
If he stays strong for another few years, I’m thinking he could be the last man to record 250 wins and 3000 K.
I was looking in to Verlander the other day since based on LOB% he seems to be getting extremely lucky. This was before his most recent start, when he led MLB at 93%.
As you calculated above, it has felt all season that every run he gives up is on homers (and I can identify with the runners on base for homer data issues). This felt un-lucky to me, so seeing another popular metric scream that he was being very lucky led me to dig in to LOB%.
LOB% has an adjustment in the formula to remove the effect of runs scored from home runs, where it assumes the average runners-on-base for home runs is 0.4 (1.4 Runs per HR). This adjustment is absolutely killing Verlander.
To quantify how badly this adjustment is hurting him, I pulled all qualified pitcher seasons from 2008-2019, and calculated LOB%, LOB+ (just as you’d think), nLOB% (new LOB without the HR adjustment), and nLOB+. Justin Verlander this season has the largest difference compared to league average (98 nLOB+ vs 126 LOB+ = -28) in the period by nearly double the 2nd highest pitcher (-14, 2011 Bronson Arroyo).
For comparison, here’s how the second place LOB% pitcher for 2019 compares across with Verlander for these metrics:
Verlander: LOB% = 93%, LOB+ = 126; nLOB% = 62%, nLOB+ = 98
Ryu: LOB% = 92%, LOB+ = 125; nLOB% = 81%, nLOB+ = 127
I’d argue Ryu has been quite a bit “luckier” in the LOB% sense than Verlander, despite very similar LOB%’s, because I assume Verlander’s Runs per HR is much lower then Ryu’s.
I haven’t been able to dig into things further due to the difficulties pulling runners-on data for homers, but it would be interesting to understand more about whether a pitcher like Verlander’s Runs per HR is a skill, and invalidates the broad 1.4 Runs per HR assumption in LOB%.
Ahh, 2005 Carlos Silva. 3.39 K/9, 0.43 BB/9. Willians Astudillo is the Carlos Silva of hitting.