Kelvin Herrera’s New Twist

There’s something that would bother me about Kelvin Herrera. To be clear, it had nothing to do with his personality. And it had nothing to do with the fact that he was successful. Herrera should be successful. Have you watched him? The last two years, he’s run a 2.06 ERA. He’s allowed a .570 OPS, and while maybe that doesn’t mean a lot to you without context, how about this as context — Kenley Jansen has allowed a .569 OPS. David Robertson, .581. The numbers have been there for Herrera. He’s been a reliever with a triple-digit fastball and some statistics to match. Nothing about that is weird.

What would bother me was that, just from watching Herrera for a few minutes, you’d think he’d be a high-strikeout pitcher. Just from being aware of his velocity, you’d think he’d be a high-strikeout pitcher. I know we might make too much of strikeouts around here. I know I shouldn’t have been too bothered when Herrera was still finding ways to succeed. But the last two years, he’s been a flamethrower with the same strikeout rate as Chad Qualls. Compared to the league, Herrera actually ran a strikeout rate that was slightly below average for a reliever. It’s a small thing, maybe a petty thing, but it’s a thing my brain struggled to understand. Whenever I looked at Herrera’s numbers, I’d expect them to be something different.

Something like, say, what Herrera’s done in these playoffs. Since really emerging as a shutdown reliever for the Royals, Herrera’s struck out a little more than a fifth of the hitters he’s faced. Against the Astros and Blue Jays, however, he’s struck out about half of the hitters he’s faced. Herrera in this postseason: 33 batters, 16 strikeouts, .438 OPS. The heat, as you know, has been there. But it’s been accompanied by something different, something new. Kelvin Herrera tinkered with a slider, and he learned to harness it just in time.

When Herrera was younger, his breaking ball was a curve. As he moved into and got used to the bullpen, the curve almost went away, with Herrera settling on his big fastball and a quality changeup. Every so often a curve would get mixed in, but it wasn’t really recognized as one of his pitches. Even this year, in the first half, Herrera spun a curve from time to time. But it wasn’t a reliable pitch. Herrera was in the market for a third pitch — not because it was necessary, but because he thought it could make him better. Herrera started trying to develop a slider. You don’t just get confidence in a new pitch right away, but the usage clearly shows that Herrera is feeling good in the right month.

  • 1st Half: 4% breaking balls
  • 2nd Half: 7%
  • Playoffs: 25%

It’s like he’s a different pitcher. Really, first and foremost, he’s the same pitcher — he’s the guy with a harder fastball than almost anyone else. But now Herrera’s mixing in a breaking ball with great frequency, and this month his changeup has just about been put away in storage. Part of that is because, this month, Herrera has mostly faced righties, but now he’s even better equipped to put them away. And you’ve already seen his strikeout count. Righties in particular now need to respect something other than 100 at the belt. The fastball is difficult enough when it’s almost all that you know about.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Here’s Herrera putting Jose Bautista away in an at-bat that earlier featured heat inside:

It’s not a clean full swing and miss, but it shows up the same as one. And, it was a complete blowout, but it’s not like Bautista is one to take a plate appearance off. Herrera got Bautista to commit to a pair of sliders in that at-bat. Now, here’s Herrera surprising Chris Colabello on the first pitch:

Colabello looked unprepared. The same goes here for Russell Martin:

Think about what it took to throw those pitches. Those last two were both first pitches from Game 6, when the Royals led by one with the World Series calling. Both Colabello and Martin are plenty powerful, but Herrera still believed in the slider enough to go for the element of relative surprise. In the season’s second half, when Herrera’s slider was new, it was almost always limited to two-strike counts. Mediocre breaking balls can be effective two-strike breaking balls. In the playoffs, only about a third of Herrera’s sliders have come with two strikes. His overall usage of the pitch shows his heightened confidence in it. And his more specific usage patterns show his heightened confidence in it. Herrera didn’t need a breaking ball, but now that he has one, the results are what you’d expect.

His fastball breaks a good deal arm-side. His changeup breaks a good deal arm-side. His slider breaks a good deal glove-side, with more than seven inches of run. Based on movement, it’s actually a fair comparison for Jose Fernandez’s breaking ball. And Herrera has figured out his delivery and control. As a consequence, the majority of Herrera’s postseason sliders have been strikes, and the majority of the swings at the slider have missed. I don’t even think the Royals planned on this, but a neat way to not miss Greg Holland is to have one of your other relievers take his numbers to the moon. Herrera was already effective, but now he’s pitching like another closer. The guy blessed with the fastball suddenly has two other things.

I don’t know if it’s fair to say Herrera’s going to shock the Mets. They’ve certainly picked up on what he’s doing, and Yoenis Cespedes is the only Met to have faced Herrera more than once. (He has faced him twice.) So there’s not a big rich history. The Mets will try to prepare their hitters for the Royals bullpen, using the most up-to-date information. But preparation can do only so much. When it comes right down to it, Kelvin Herrera has a slider now, and he’s not even the most terrifying guy in the group. The goal: score early. They’re probably going to have to if they don’t want this to suck.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Borigh
10 years ago

Am a Mets fan, keep hearing how amazing the Royals bullpen is, know this to be true.

My question is: how amazing are they, quantifiably? Like, if you z-score AL playoff/AL Pennant winning bullpens over the past 10 years by -FIP, how many standard deviations is this KC Penn. Are they one standard deviation better than the average World Series bullpen? That’s scary. 1.5, 2? Terrifying.

Dave
10 years ago
Reply to  Borigh

They’re really good.

bb
10 years ago

The Royals pen features 2 spectacular relievers. Then Ryan madson who is pretty good. Hoch is fine, etc. Kind of overrated though when looking at the pen as a whole

Bryz
10 years ago
Reply to  bb

The Royals relievers finished 1st in ERA-, 6th in FIP-, 1st in LOB%, and 1st in batting average allowed. Yes, I cherry-picked those statistics, but I hardly think they were “overrated… as a whole.”

Paul H.
10 years ago

I was at Game 6, by far the most intense and nerve wracking sporting event I have ever experienced in person, and it was interesting to see how Herrera attacked hitters.

He came in to face Colabello in a 2-1 game with Encarnacion on second and one out. Everyone in the park knew what was coming – heat. Perez / Herrera proceeded to go with the slider on pitch 1, 2 & 3 of the at bat. Down 2-1 in the count he then came with two 100MPH fast balls. He started Tulo off the same way – slider for ball 1, slider for a fly ball out in pitch 2.

Bottom of the 7th he starts out Martin the same way. At that point I don’t think Martin was surprised to see the slider but was probably surprised to see it go for a strike as he had only thrown it in the zone once. After called strike one on the slider he goes FB, FB before getting Martin to fly out on the slider. After that he only threw it once in the 10 pitches seen by Pillar and Goins.

It was pretty clear the Royals had a game plan for Herrera in that situation, they had identified the slider as a weapon and put it to good use.

One of the underrated factors in the entire ALCS was how the Royal’s pitching staff approached hitters. Volquez’s approach in Game 1 was completely different than what the Blue Jay’s were likely expecting and led to a three hit shutout. Herrera in Game 6 is another example. I am sure there are more. I would never have expected the Royals to hit the same amount of HR’s, 6, in a series with the Blue Jays – that they did is a tremendous credit to the approach and execution of a game plan by the coaches, pitching staff and Perez.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
10 years ago

Herrera also struggles putting guys away too it seems via strikeout

Whiff rate on non-2 strike count: 8.1%
Whiff rate on 2 strike count: 4.3%

His overall swinging strike rate this year is 12.5%. Similar whiff rates:

Betances – 13.4% (14.04 K/9)
Giles – 12.9% (11.19 K/9)
Sipp – 12.7% (10.27 K/9)
Herrera – 12.5% (8.27 K/9)
Street – 12.4% (8.23 K/9)

Park Chan ho's Beard
10 years ago

That Bautista gif also showed a disturbing trend I’ve noticed this postseason: home plate umps taking it into their own hands to call whether a hitter went around, instead of leaving it to the 1st/3rd base umps (where they’re better positioned and equipped to make that call) and focusing on getting the strike/ball calls correct. I hate that probably more than I hate inconsistent strike zones.