Kershaw Avoids Arbitration With Two Year Deal

According to Dylan Hernandez, the Dodgers have avoided arbitration with Clayton Kershaw by signing him to a two year contract worth a total of $19 million. Jon Heyman notes that it will break down as $8 million in 2012 and $11 million in 2013.

Kershaw was eligible for arbitration for the first time, and had filed a request for $10 million while the Dodgers countered with an offer of $6.5 million. The two parties settled just south of the midpoint between those two figures for 2012, and then guaranteed Kershaw a 38% raise for 2013. That’s a bit of a discount over what he likely would have earned through arbitration had he followed up with another successful season, but he also disposes of some injury risk by taking the guaranteed money now. For context, both Tim Lincecum (2/23) and Cole Hamels (3/20) signed deals that paid them similar amounts when they were first-time arbitration eligible, though both were Super-Twos and were a year further away from free agency when they agreed to sell a few of their arb years.

Essentially, Kershaw offered the Dodgers the potential to save a couple of million on his 2013 salary – and avoid the never-fun arbitration hearings – in exchange for giving him a little more security in case he blows his arm out at some point this year. The Dodgers weren’t able to delay his free agency, or even buy out his final arbitration year, but they get a little bit of cost certainty for the next couple of years. If Kershaw stays healthy, he’s set himself up to get a massive extension in two years or hit free agency in three, all while getting rid of enough risk that he shouldn’t have to worry about his finances for the rest of his life.

While teams have been proactive in trying to get their young stars locked up sooner, this is probably a better path for elite young arms – establish yourself as a star, then sell off a bit of your arbitration earnings to get rid of some risk, and still set yourself up for the monster payday that comes with free agent eligibility. Don’t be surprised if more agents start pushing their young players to follow the Lincecum/Hamels/Kershaw path instead of the Matt Moore career path.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Oliver
12 years ago

Geez, is Kershaw going to hit the market at 26, 27? Good extension all around. Kershaw could be better than Timmy. Is better?

jim
12 years ago
Reply to  Oliver

it looks like he took the step last year, that’s for sure

DavidCEisen
12 years ago
Reply to  Oliver

For what it is worth, during the previous two seasons Kershaw accumulated 11.5 WAR and Lincecum 9.3.

cal
12 years ago
Reply to  DavidCEisen

two cy youngs and a WS ring in one of those years you mentioned. Lincecum is better than Kershaw when you add the years both have been in MLB.

and the price tag shows it. he didnt get what Lincecum got

DavidCEisen
12 years ago
Reply to  DavidCEisen

Lincecum won his Cy Young Awards three and four seasons ago; Kershaw won it last season. World Series wins go to teams not individuals–Lincecum was an important piece to winning, but so was Cody Ross. The question is which one is better moving forward. Kershaw is coming off his best season; Lincecum is coming off his second straight year of decline. Further Kershaw just completed his age 23 season and Lincecum just completed his age 27 season. In other words Kershaw won the Cy Young at the same age Lincecum was a rookie.