Kyle Schwarber Needs to Be Himself

Consider, for a moment, Kyle Schwarber. If you saw him in street clothes and were told that he’s a professional athlete, you would assume that he’s a football player. A linebacker, perhaps. Some sort of bruiser with the job of clobbering other players.

Schwarber’s job is not to clobber other players, however, but rather to clobber baseballs. He’s quite good at that. This year, however, has been something of a struggle for the goateed one. Last night’s 0-for-4 showing sent Schwarber under the Mendoza line and dropped his batting line to an unsightly 79 wRC+. It’s early yet, and Schwarber has just 115 plate appearances to his name so far this season, but this is decidedly not what the Cubs want from their leadoff hitter and one of their biggest (literally and figuratively) sluggers.

Joe Maddon’s usage of Schwarber in the leadoff spot is predicated upon Schwarber’s theoretical ability to get on base. To be fair, he’s done an admirable job in that. Rocking a .322 OBP with a .196 average isn’t easy at all. Getting some more hits will make that OBP go up even more, though, and Schwarber (or any hitter, for that matter) is at his best when he’s crushing the ball into the next time zone.

We know Schwarber can still do that. Exhibit A:

Schwarber hasn’t had a real chance for prolonged big-league time just yet. He played in 69 games when he first came up, and then lost nearly all of last season to his devastating knee injury. Despite his talents and his exploits in the postseason, we don’t yet have an idea of what a full season’s worth of Schwarber really looks like. We’ve got 393 regular-season plate appearances with which to work, though. So let’s poke around a bit.

Rian Watt wrote an excellent piece for The Athletic* about Schwarber’s approach this year. Schwarber is making much more contact than in the past, but the results of that contact are worse. Indeed, consider: Schwarber is has produced a contact rate of 76.9% so far this season, far higher than the mark he recorded in 2015 (67.6%). He’s hitting the ball on the ground more, which means fewer balls in the air. If you’ve read FanGraphs at all over the last few months — or been involved in baseball discourse at all, for that matter — you know that hitting the ball in the air is generally a more favorable approach. It’s impossible to get yourself a 6-3 putout if you’re banging the ball off the wall or off the seats.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

*It’s worth reading, as is much of the work at The Athletic.

What’s perhaps even more troubling is that Schwarber is pulling the ball far less. When he first surfaced in 2015, Schwarber sent the ball to the right side of the field just under 47% of the time. This year he’s done that with just 35.5% of his batted balls. While Schwarber is strong enough to effectively drive the ball to whichever part of the park he pleases, he’s still likely to do the most damage to the pull side. His spray charts from 2015 show that he can hit home runs to all fields, but that hits largely came from the right side of the field.

So, does this mean that Schwarber should attempt to make less contact? That certainly seems counterintuitive. Contact isn’t generally regarded as a bad thing. It’s quite often a good thing. And perhaps this will all even out with time, and Schwarber will start driving the ball more as he gets more used to his new approach. But Schwarber is a slugger, a big bruising power hitter.

Perhaps Schwarber’s new approach is a reaction to infield shifts, but Schwarber was elevating more (i.e. hitting fewer grounders overall) when he was pulling the ball with authority. If he can find a way to accomplish both contact and elevation at the same time, then the NL Central is in deep trouble. But somehow, Schwarber must find a way to drive again. The Cubs are likely going to be fine no matter what he does. They’re still a fantastically talented club, with plenty of offense to go around.

Schwarber, however, figured to be a major cog in the machine. The Cubs are one game over .500 in what’s been a mess of a division. One would imagine that they’ll break away from the pack regardless of whether or not Schwarber is hitting. Some more loud contact from him would go a long way in that endeavor.

He will always have his greatest advantage, and that is his body. He’s still a large bear of a man who looks like he should be wrestling bulls or something. He’s still got his natural power. He just needs to figure out how to use it as often as he once did.





Nick is a columnist at FanGraphs, and has written previously for Baseball Prospectus and Beyond the Box Score. Yes, he hates your favorite team, just like Joe Buck. You can follow him on Twitter at @StelliniTweets, and can contact him at stellinin1 at gmail.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dtpollittMember since 2016
9 years ago

A thing: If you check out Schwarber’s rolling averages (which is regular season only, I think, so it ignores his outstanding 2015/2016 playoff performances), you’ll see that his late 2015 and early 2017 numbers are somewhat similar in lowered productivity (re: wOBA, OPS).

That said, he doesn’t appear to be the same player as late 2015: He seems to be a more selective hitter (Contact% up and SwStr% down), but like you said, Pull% and HardHit% way down.

Honestly as a Cubs fan, I can’t put my finger on why he’s struggling so much.

robhuff
9 years ago
Reply to  dtpollitt

I’m going to go out on a limb and assume that you haven’t factored in his late-late 2015 numbers. That .333/.419/.889 playoff line over 31 PAs doesn’t jive well with the notion that Schwarber’s production has dipped, especially not when you consider that he homered off of (1) Gerrit Cole, (2) Michael Wacha, (3) Kevin Siegrist, (4) Matt Harvey, and (5) Jacob deGrom over those nine games.

That’s not a struggling player; that’s peak Barry Bonds.

dtpollittMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  robhuff

I don’t think you read what I wrote: “which is regular season only, I think, so it ignores his outstanding 2015/2016 playoff performances”

Spartacus
9 years ago
Reply to  dtpollitt

“he doesn’t appear to be the same player as late 2015”

Here’s the thing. He has 393 career plate appearances; 273 in ’15, 5 in ’16, 115 this year. He’s only played 2/3s of a full season and too many fans (at least in Chicago) act like he’s an experienced slugger.

He hasn’t played enough both before the injury and after the injury to come to any kind of conclusions over what type of hitter he will be.

He clearly needs more experience, which most hitters with less than 400 career plate appearances need.

bunslow
9 years ago
Reply to  Spartacus

As I said on reddit several days ago, merely playing one full complete season this year would literally triple his all time PA count (in the majors)

southie
9 years ago

Like Sean Parker told Mark Zuckerberg in the Social Network (great movie btw) we don’t even know what he is yet. He’s cool, that’s all we know.

Look at his batted ball and contact rates. Good luck finding a pattern or baseline. He has been all over the place.

He should be fine but what level of confidence can anyone have with such limited data? If anything he’s probably a touch overrated at this stage.

Spartacus
9 years ago
Reply to  southie

I didn’t read this when I posted above… well said!

Chris KMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  southie

This. All day. He looked impossibly good with no prep in the postseason, but in his regular season sample he–not to put too fine a point on it–sucks, for a guy who can’t play the field at all. That’s not to say that he might not be a wonderful hitter underneath, but it seems like everyone made grand proclamations about Schwarber (and Baez, for that matter) like 500 PA too early.

Can we just wait a while to see what happens? I think it’s clear at this point that he’s a DH, but let’s just find out whether he’s AAAA or–as he flashes from time to time–an elite hitter with light tower power. Not nearly enough PA to get an idea, yet.

SucramRenrutMember since 2017
9 years ago

It is possible that the lead-off spot is in his head and he needs to get back to being more aggressive and taking his walks otherwise. But from a SSS perspective, his timing is probably just off. There is such a minute difference between pulling the ball with authority and rolling over to the second baseman, that he could snap out of it at any time.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago

I think he will be fine, maybe the leadoff thing has messed with his mind a little.

I’m more worried about his defense. He currently is on pace for minus 30 runs which is kemp/hanley bad. I don’t think he is that bad but if he is a minus 15 guy he might still only be a 1.5 war player despite a 120 wRC+ or so. That wouldn’t kill the cubs but it would limit his upside a little unless he becomes an ortiz kind of hitter which I dont think he is (I think he is a 30 hr guy with a good walk rate but he doesn’t have ortiz contact skill and probably is more of a 250 hitter with good obp and power).

I think in his prime he will be a 125 to 130 wrc+ guy and you have to consider were that produces the most value considering his defensive limitations.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago

Nobody knows what Schwarber is. His breakout rookie season included a sub .250 BA, and that includes the fluky hot-streak to begin his half-season. He was really bad at times during his call-up. As of this moment, this is a career .228 hitter in about 100 games. He is still riding that magical little run when he was called up, but so is Carlos Correa so I guess he is in good company there. I don’t think that Schwarber is a bust or anything, but I certainly don’t know what he is. I always thought he was Billy Butler 2.0, but I don’t know anything that anyone else doesn’t. Butler was a really good hitter, but he didn’t age well, so that is not a slight. Butler probably didn’t have the power of Schwarber, but Butler was probably the better hitter. I think Kyle’s struggles are mostly unreal expectations for an unknown quantity as opposed to some radical shift in approach.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

I remember we all had a heated discussion about Schwarber as leadoff guy over the winter. I think there’s pros and cons of having him hit leadoff, but I just don’t think it’s good for a very young player to try and be a “leadoff” hitter if they’re new to the role. I know that officially it shouldn’t matter, but it does seem to matter, and that’s why Zobrist isn’t batting leadoff every game (he has done worse in the leadoff role than elsewhere in the order over the course of his career). And if that’s the case, then it may be bad for his development. Put him in a spot where he’s comfortable and let someone else play leadoff…
…also, he has already piled up -1.3 baserunning. What is up with that? Aside from the leg injuries from last year.

Pwn Shop
9 years ago

That double right in front of home plate tho

phoenix2042Member since 2016
9 years ago

He’s on pace for historically bad defense and baserunning. Even with a 120 wRC+ that’s probably a 1 WAR package or so. With poor hitting… that’s unplayable. He does not belong in the outfield, but Rizzo doesn’t either probably. It seems sort of like a Mark Trumbo situation where he is forced to play a position that he can barely even fake, and he doesn’t hit well enough to make up for it. He would need to hit a new level of performance (like his postseason #s hint at being able to?) to be a valuable overall package. He needs to be David Ortiz (amazing enough hitter to counter massive losses from defense and baserunning), but he is no David Ortiz, at least not yet.

Also he doesn’t even have a full year of playing time yet, so it’s way too early to claim that this who Schwarber is. He needs to play consistently and adjust to the majors like any young/new player. He feels like old news because he debuted back in 2015, but he’s got so little experience in the majors. I wish it were possible to combine his postseason and regular season numbers into one combined stat line to get a sense of his total performance against MLB pitching. Postseason is a disproportionately large part of his sample right now.

kbukie
9 years ago
Reply to  phoenix2042

“He’s on pace for historically bad defense and baserunning.”

…based on what, exactly? He’s a below average fielder and baserunner, sure, but this assessment is based purely on “He doesn’t look like a baseball player.”

Art Fay
9 years ago

While his splits vs LHP this year are better(I’m guessing we’re too sample-sized at this point), he was beyond atrocious against LHP during his callup year. Fortunately most didn’t notice because the balls he hit vs righties were still on their way back from orbiting Saturn. But he was useless against LHP. I feel bad for him because he was crowned as Babe Ruth 2.0 way too prematurely. And i feel worse for him that he’s going to have to be Babe Ruth 2.0 to offset the -3 or -4 dWAR he’s going to post this year. His minor league numbers say otherwise, but there’s a chance he might not be very good. It’s going to be tough for him to be a valuable NL player. Fortunately he plays in the NL Central where the only good pitching is on his team. There’s AAAA everywhere to feast on. He’s pretty entertaining so I’m rooting for him.