Let’s Sign Some Contracts! 2025 Edition

Kamil Krzaczynski and Jeff Hanisch-Imagn Images

Spending your own money is fun, but spending someone else’s money is even better! When it comes to extending major league contracts, unless you’re a billionaire, or a millionaire with a lot of millionaire business partners, you pretty much have to live vicariously through those other parties. Keeping talent wearing your uniform, of course, has more utility than a simple splendiferous shopping spree, since the players you want to retain are unlikely to get less expensive when they hit free agency. The Toronto Blue Jays did their own impressive feat of cash-splashing last month, when they gave Vladimir Guerrero Jr. half a billion bucks or about $700 million puckaroos, maplebacks, or whatever it is that Canadians call their money. Yes, comments section, I’m aware they’re dollars.

For this year’s edition, I’ve chosen seven players to sign to long-term deals with their current clubs, and in all seven cases, I believe an extension would be mutually beneficial for both the player and his respective team. I’ve included the up-to-date ZiPS projections for each player, as well as the contract that ZiPS thinks each player should get, though that doesn’t necessarily mean that I think the player will end up with that figure or even sign an extension.

Tarik Skubal, Detroit Tigers – Seven years, $240 million

ZiPS Projection – Tarik Skubal
Year W L ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
2026 13 7 2.79 29 29 174.0 141 54 14 33 193 149 4.7
2027 13 7 2.88 29 29 172.0 144 55 15 33 186 144 4.5
2028 12 7 2.99 28 28 165.3 143 55 15 31 174 139 4.1
2029 11 7 3.12 28 28 158.7 140 55 15 30 161 133 3.7
2030 10 8 3.26 28 28 154.7 141 56 16 29 153 127 3.4
2031 10 7 3.50 27 27 149.3 142 58 16 29 143 119 2.9
2032 9 8 3.56 26 26 144.0 139 57 16 29 135 117 2.7

After his unanimous selection as the AL Cy Young winner last season, Tarik Skubal isn’t doing anything in 2025 that would make him less expensive on a long-term deal. When I ran ZiPS late last summer, Skubal just barely beat out Logan Webb for the most rest-of-career projected WAR among active starting pitchers, and he has maintained a very slight edge since. The AL Central is just ripe for some team to dominate the rest, and even if the Tigers don’t spend like they did during the Mike Ilitch years, they don’t need to dish out $300 million a year to be the big dog in this division. Skubal gives Detroit a weapon that no other AL Central team can match, and at this point, he’s probably no more of an injury risk than is any other pitcher. Outside of Javier Báez, the Tigers have very little guaranteed money on the books (Colt Keith’s deal wouldn’t even hamstring the Pirates or A’s), and if they’re looking going to spend to keep one player on the team long term, who else could it be?

Wyatt Langford, Texas Rangers – Nine years, $239 million

ZiPS Projection – Wyatt Langford
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ WAR
2026 .272 .349 .488 522 84 142 28 5 25 89 57 112 19 134 4.1
2027 .270 .348 .488 541 89 146 29 4 27 93 60 113 19 133 4.2
2028 .269 .349 .489 555 92 149 30 4 28 96 64 112 18 134 4.3
2029 .270 .352 .490 560 93 151 31 4 28 97 66 111 17 135 4.4
2030 .268 .351 .485 557 92 149 31 3 28 96 67 109 15 134 4.3
2031 .266 .351 .479 549 91 146 30 3 27 93 67 107 14 132 4.1
2032 .265 .350 .477 535 87 142 29 3 26 90 65 105 13 131 3.9
2033 .265 .350 .477 516 84 137 28 3 25 86 62 102 11 131 3.7
2034 .265 .350 .471 516 82 137 28 3 24 85 62 103 10 130 3.5

ZiPS was famously in love with Wyatt Langford coming into 2024, projecting him for 2.6 WAR just a few months after he was drafted out of Florida. The projection looked cringe early on as Langford struggled, but after returning from the hamstring injury that cost him most of May, he went on a tear, hitting .261/.334/.452 for a 122 wRC+ and 3.0 WAR the rest of the way. He finished the year off with a flourish, hitting eight homers and putting up nearly a 1.000 OPS in September. Langford has a 145 wRC+ this season and is already at the 1.0-WAR mark, and with nearly two years until he hits even salary arbitration, this is the best time for he and the Rangers to come to a deal that buys out some of his free agent years. He is projected to be the Rangers’ most valuable player in the long term, and they have demonstrated a willingness to spend top dollar on their best guys.

Kyle Tucker, Chicago Cubs – Eight years, $203 million

ZiPS Projection – Kyle Tucker
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ WAR
2026 .260 .354 .474 546 89 142 27 3 28 92 79 92 22 128 4.4
2027 .260 .353 .471 535 86 139 26 3 27 88 77 90 20 127 4.2
2028 .252 .346 .447 519 80 131 25 2 24 82 74 88 17 119 3.4
2029 .249 .343 .436 497 76 124 23 2 22 75 71 85 15 116 3.0
2030 .245 .339 .423 468 68 115 22 2 19 67 66 82 12 111 2.4
2031 .240 .333 .401 434 61 104 20 1 16 59 60 78 10 104 1.7
2032 .238 .331 .397 391 54 93 18 1 14 52 54 71 8 102 1.4
2033 .235 .327 .389 345 46 81 15 1 12 44 47 63 6 99 1.0

ZiPS was notoriously grumpy about Kyle Tucker back in March, but it’s coming around on him fast, and the gap between ZiPS and Steamer from the preseason has narrowed by two-thirds. No, the Cubs aren’t going to be able to sign him for $203 million; if he were willing to sign for that amount of money, I suspect the congratulatory press conference announcing his signing would have been months ago. But there is a dollar amount that will do the trick, and while that figure almost certainly won’t be as high as what Guerrero Jr. signed for, the fact that so few impact bats will hit free agency over the next few years gives Tucker a great deal of leverage. Now that Guerrero’s off the market, ZiPS projects Tucker to have the best 2026-2028 wRC+ of any player who is set to enter free agency after either this season or next. The second-best outfielder is Cubs teammate Seiya Suzuki, who has a 10-point shortfall compared to Tucker, not to mention that Suzuki is a much worse defender.

MacKenzie Gore, Washington Nationals – Six years, $123 million

ZiPS Projection – MacKenzie Gore
Year W L ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
2026 11 9 3.70 30 30 165.3 147 68 19 56 193 110 3.1
2027 10 10 3.77 29 29 160.0 146 67 19 52 184 108 2.9
2028 10 9 3.82 28 28 157.7 146 67 19 50 176 107 2.7
2029 9 10 3.90 28 28 152.3 144 66 19 48 165 104 2.5
2030 9 10 4.01 28 28 150.3 145 67 19 48 158 102 2.2
2031 8 9 4.16 26 26 138.3 137 64 18 44 141 98 1.9

The Nationals aren’t contenders yet, but when you look at their offensive core, you see the fuzzy edges of a lineup that will get Washington back to playing October baseball. While the rotation has actually been surprisingly solid so far this season, pitchers like Jake Irvin and Mitchell Parker are overperforming their peripheral numbers, and we can’t bank on either of them to be a true ace. MacKenzie Gore, on the other hand, has peripherals that are even better than his excellent early-season stats — and he currently leads the league in strikeouts. That’s no fluke, either, as hitters simply aren’t making much contact against the former first-rounder. Gore’s 66.3% contact rate, if maintained, would be the 11th-best number among ERA qualifiers over the last decade, just behind former teammate Patrick Cor… OK, let’s stop that sentence before it gets dark. That Gore has two more years of cost control remaining gives the Nats an opportunity to absorb some risk on the injury front in order to get a better deal for a pitcher who looks like he’ll get rather expensive in a couple of years.

Logan Gilbert, Seattle Mariners – Six years, $121 million

ZiPS Projection – Logan Gilbert
Year W L ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
2026 10 7 3.41 31 31 184.7 155 70 24 43 193 114 3.6
2027 9 7 3.49 29 29 173.0 148 67 23 40 176 111 3.2
2028 8 7 3.56 27 27 162.0 143 64 22 38 159 109 2.8
2029 8 6 3.64 26 26 148.3 133 60 20 35 142 107 2.4
2030 7 7 3.80 26 26 144.3 135 61 21 34 134 102 2.1
2031 6 6 3.95 22 22 127.7 123 56 19 31 115 98 1.6

To paraphrase Saint Augustine of Hippo: Jerry Dipoto, give me a Logan Gilbert contract extension, but not yet. You should probably never sign a pitcher who is currently on the IL with a flexor strain to big deal, so unlike the other extensions here, I wouldn’t suggest that the Mariners do this tomorrow. But if Gilbert comes back without problems or red flags, Seattle should sign him long term, especially with pitchers like George Kirby and Bryan Woo farther away for free agency and Luis Castillo not the talent he was as few years ago. ZiPS projects Gilbert to rank 10th among pitchers in five-year WAR, and of the others in the top 10, only Gilbert, Skubal, and Webb are eligible for free agency within the next three years. ZiPS prices Gilbert a bit lower than Gore, simply because the former is older and comes with a little less upside.

Steven Kwan, Cleveland Guardians – Six years, $111 million

ZiPS Projection – Steven Kwan
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ WAR
2026 .297 .371 .413 560 86 166 24 4 11 65 61 60 15 124 3.8
2027 .292 .367 .404 552 83 161 24 4 10 63 60 58 13 120 3.4
2028 .286 .361 .396 536 79 153 23 3 10 60 58 56 12 116 3.0
2029 .282 .359 .389 514 75 145 22 3 9 56 56 54 10 114 2.7
2030 .276 .353 .379 485 69 134 20 3 8 51 53 51 9 109 2.2
2031 .272 .350 .370 449 62 122 19 2 7 46 49 49 8 106 1.8

Steven Kwan is not a traditional corner outfielder, but even with his lack of power, he’s blossomed into an All-Star left fielder. Kwan is one of the most valuable contact hitters in baseball, and he makes the most of his elite contact ability by not falling into what I call the David Fletcher trap: Being so good at making contact that you hit a lot of pitches that you shouldn’t swing at. On the contrary, Kwan is a rather disciplined hitter for someone with his bat-to-ball skills; his career walk and chase rates are better than the league average. He plays solid defense in left field and gets as much out of his middling speed as is possible. The Guardians don’t like signing big deals, but José Ramírez isn’t impervious to the effects of aging, and the Guardians will have serious issues if they have to replace the production of both J-Ram and Kwan at the same time.

Hunter Brown, Houston Astros – Six years, $105 million

ZiPS Projection – Hunter Brown
Year W L ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
2026 11 7 3.35 28 25 153.0 133 57 15 50 153 123 3.2
2027 11 7 3.35 27 24 150.3 132 56 15 48 148 123 3.1
2028 10 7 3.44 26 23 149.3 133 57 16 47 143 120 2.9
2029 10 7 3.55 26 22 144.3 130 57 16 45 135 116 2.7
2030 10 7 3.66 26 22 142.7 131 58 16 45 131 113 2.5
2031 9 7 3.76 23 20 131.7 124 55 16 41 117 110 2.2

Is Hunter Brown an ace now? I get asked that question in my chats three or four times a week now, and for the most part, I’ve avoided answering it because I knew that this piece was coming. So the answer is: Yes, yes he is. We have yet to see him carry a workload of 180-200 innings in a season, but at the moment, he’s on track to get there this year. And besides, volume is becoming less and less a part of an ace’s job description. Over the last calendar year, Brown ranks sixth in baseball with 5.1 WAR. During that span, he’s totaled 185 2/3 innings in 30 starts and posted a 16-6 record with a 2.28 ERA and a 2.89 FIP. Brown makes less than a million this year, and he’s still a long way away from fabulous riches. Buying out a few of his free agency years could be a good idea for both Brown and the Astros.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Guru
4 hours ago

his system needs reworking big time..everyone knows its antiquated. Don’t have enough time to write about why…but 80% of the teams are way past these marcel models these days. If you use a marcel based model to make decisions you are likely in the bottom 5 in MLB standings.

The fact that wyatt langford is higher than kyle tucker is borderline comical.

edges64Member since 2024
3 hours ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

LOL

DarwinA
3 hours ago
Reply to  The Guru

Jerry dipoto called ZiPS sophisticated. Kevin Goldstein said ZiPS was as good or better than stuff made by teams he’s work with.

Some dude who doesn’t even know how ZiPS works apparently knows more though.

drdoctorMember since 2020
2 hours ago
Reply to  The Guru

If that’s true, someone tell the Rockies and White Sox to use a Marcel based model rather than whatever the fuk they do use.

scaiMember since 2024
1 hour ago
Reply to  drdoctor

They probably use an OOTP Baseball or MLB The Show simulator to make decisions

PhilMember since 2016
1 hour ago
Reply to  scai

As advanced as that? I had assumed it was the original R.B.I. Baseball which had been running non-stop since 1987 on a NES in Dick Monfort’s office.

David KleinMember since 2024
24 minutes ago
Reply to  Phil

Speaking of rbi baseball, r.i.p Chet Lemon that game was the first time I had heard of him he was a heck of a player